Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

*Update‼️ In a resurfaced video from 2018 Lex P🪬 admits that she doesn’t mind playing the side to men in relationships 😵‍💫 Now this is why Toya said what about the women that willingly participates in cheating ‼️ Yall was defending her for something she clearly stands on🙂‍↔️

692,534 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

If you dont know what happened ⁉️ I gat you‼️ Mo'Nique (the Oscar-winning comedian/actress) and Charlamagne tha God clashed in 2018 over her Netflix boycott and his "Donkey of the Day" segment‼️. In late 2017/early 2018, Netflix offered Mo'Nique around $500,000 for a comedy special‼️. She viewed this as far below what they paid other comedians (Dave Chappelle, Chris Rock, Amy Schumer) and accused the company of racial and gender bias‼️. She publicly called for a boycott‼️. Charlamagne named her Donkey of the Day, arguing she was using real issues of inequality as cover for a personal/business dispute and questioning why she felt she deserved the much higher payouts others received‼️. She came on *The Breakfast Club* in February 2018 specifically to confront him‼️. The interview was tense from the start‼️. She called him by his government name (Lenard), accused him of not doing his homework, not knowing the history of Black entertainers (especially Black women), and sending a message that Black women who demand equality get devalued‼️. She asked pointed questions like whether his own mother or grandmother would be “donkeys” for facing inequality. Charlamagne pushed back that this was more an individual situation than a systemic one and that she was mixing issues‼️. As she was leaving, she delivered the most pointed remarks (captured in behind-the-scenes footage): she said people would have to “explain brothers like you,” compared him to the slave in *The Birth of a Nation* who walks his wife into the master’s house, and later described him as playing a big part in “destruction” in the Black community or even “the worst thing to happen to Black people.”‼️ The two sides stayed at odds for years‼️. In 2022 she settled her lawsuit with Netflix and later released a special‼️. In 2024, after she brought the old “Donkey of the Day” moment up again on *Club Shay Shay*, Charlamagne publicly apologized on air, saying she was right, he should have stayed out of her business, there *is* a pay gap for Black women, and he had disturbed her peace‼️. She and her husband accepted it‼️. The core disagreement was Charlamagne treating her Netflix stance as an overreach or personal grievance while she saw it as part of a larger pattern of undervaluing Black women in entertainment‼️and viewed his public dunking on her as betrayal from within the community‼️.

(st_ides)

44,678 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Watch Candace contradict herself from one month to the next. 👇👇👇 In January, Candace confirmed that a TPUSA donor who’s a “very good person” and was at the Aspen retreat said that Charlie did actually say he’d want Erika to take over in the event of something happening. Candace said the story “checked out” and that she had her answer. Now, she’s telling us that another donor has said actually no Charlie said nothing of the sort. Obviously two separate donors can say two separate things; it happens. The problem is that Candace is pretending she never said what she said in January. She seems to have forgotten all about this very good person donor from January who’s story checked out. She doesn’t seem at all concerned that this donor apparently lied to her, and she doesn’t explain to her audience—an audience she claims to be working with to “crowdsource” an “investigation”—why she believes one donor over the other. Both (or all) donors remain unnamed, so we can’t check for ourselves why we’re getting conflicting stories from them and from Candace. Another problem? Candace is now saying that Charlie saying this in Aspen never passed the sniff test for her—but if that’s the case, why did she hide that from us in January? Why didn’t she clue her audience into that? The audience she again claims to be working alongside? Why did she lead us to believe the story checked out if it “didn’t pass the sniff test”? Candace is making it up as she goes along. Her story shifts from month to month—not in the typical way for a fluid investigation but rather in ways wherein she all-out contradicts herself from one month to the next and never actually explains why. It’s as if previous months are simply forgotten by her—and she’s hoping you’ll forget too.

Natalie Jean Beisner

82,026 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten