Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Update on Change My Mind: the Professor Debates LIVE from Philly Friday's debate at the Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts has been cancelled. Due to circumstances beyond our control, but totally in the control of the venue, we're prevented from giving you the free speech debate you deserve.... show more

Steven Crowder

2,547,091 subscribers

84,957 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The University of Pennsylvania (Penn) Does Not Support Free Speech. Change My Mind was always meant to challenge institutions that fail the people they’re supposed to teach. The debate topic between myself and Prof. Zimmerman set for this week’s CMM is free speech, where it stands, and who is trying to kill it. Well, we have our answer. Where the Left thrives, free speech dies. UPenn is now trying to control the narrative. They’ve told us they will deny our ability to livestream the event. Why? I think we all know the answer. Regardless, we’ll be there Friday, April 10th, 7 PM ET. LIVESTREAMING. See you then.

The University of Pennsylvania (Penn) Does Not Support Free Speech. Change My Mind was always meant to challenge institutions that fail the people they’re supposed to teach. The debate topic between myself and Prof. Zimmerman set for this week’s CMM is free speech, where it stands, and who is trying to kill it. Well, we have our answer. Where the Left thrives, free speech dies. UPenn is now trying to control the narrative. They’ve told us they will deny our ability to livestream the event. Why? I think we all know the answer. Regardless, we’ll be there Friday, April 10th, 7 PM ET. LIVESTREAMING. See you then.

Steven Crowder

151,522 views • 5 months ago

Piers: "This debate you are going to have with the historian Jonathan Zimmerman at the University of Pennsylvania on Friday, ironically about free speech. Is that debate happening, or is it off?" Steven: "They said, no, we're not going to allow it.... If I was a jazz musician I could livestream it. But a transparent, respectful debate between one of their professors and someone fronting $10,000? That can't happen on campus."

Piers: "This debate you are going to have with the historian Jonathan Zimmerman at the University of Pennsylvania on Friday, ironically about free speech. Is that debate happening, or is it off?" Steven: "They said, no, we're not going to allow it.... If I was a jazz musician I could livestream it. But a transparent, respectful debate between one of their professors and someone fronting $10,000? That can't happen on campus."

Steven Crowder

567,370 views • 5 months ago

BREAKING: Kamala Harris is trying to change the rules for the Sept. 10 ABC debate, wants to be seated with a "cheat-sheet." Lmao. For whatever reason, the Vice President says she wants to have notes during the live debate. According to Jason Miller, the Harris campaign previously agreed to the same rules for the CNN debate but is now trying to back out. "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules." "If Kamala Harris isn’t smart enough to repeat the messaging points her handlers want her to memorize, that’s their problem," Miller said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They won’t allow Harris to do interviews, they won’t allow her to do press conferences, and now they want to give her a cheat-sheet for the debate." "My guess is that they’re looking for a way to get out of any debate with President Trump." Here is what happened during Harris' previous debate.

BREAKING: Kamala Harris is trying to change the rules for the Sept. 10 ABC debate, wants to be seated with a "cheat-sheet." Lmao. For whatever reason, the Vice President says she wants to have notes during the live debate. According to Jason Miller, the Harris campaign previously agreed to the same rules for the CNN debate but is now trying to back out. "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules." "If Kamala Harris isn’t smart enough to repeat the messaging points her handlers want her to memorize, that’s their problem," Miller said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They won’t allow Harris to do interviews, they won’t allow her to do press conferences, and now they want to give her a cheat-sheet for the debate." "My guess is that they’re looking for a way to get out of any debate with President Trump." Here is what happened during Harris' previous debate.

Collin Rugg

5,179,661 views • 2 years ago

IF YOU WATCH ONE THING TODAY, MAKE IT THIS: Christine Van Geyn of the Canadian Constitution Foundation is testifying about free speech at the Heritage Committee. "Free debate on contentious issues can't happen if the people currently in government are allowed to outlaw opposing point of views. The right to express your words and ideas goes to the core of who we are as individuals. The government doesn't need more means. It needs to stop trying to silence speech."

IF YOU WATCH ONE THING TODAY, MAKE IT THIS: Christine Van Geyn of the Canadian Constitution Foundation is testifying about free speech at the Heritage Committee. "Free debate on contentious issues can't happen if the people currently in government are allowed to outlaw opposing point of views. The right to express your words and ideas goes to the core of who we are as individuals. The government doesn't need more means. It needs to stop trying to silence speech."

Sheila Gunn Reid

143,053 views • 1 year ago

How FIRE defends free speech: "The precedents stay where they are. The facts change, the viewpoints change, the threats to free speech [and] the directions they come from change, but the principles have to remain the same. That’s what we are trying to do here at FIRE." -Will Creeley

How FIRE defends free speech: "The precedents stay where they are. The facts change, the viewpoints change, the threats to free speech [and] the directions they come from change, but the principles have to remain the same. That’s what we are trying to do here at FIRE." -Will Creeley

Nico Perrino

22,027 views • 1 year ago

The Prime Minister was evacuated from his house last night because of threats to his security. I've been in his shoes. I've had 24/7 police protection and my children have been evacuated from school because of threats to me and my family. Unfortunately with the frustration many people are feeling a few nutters are resorting to these threats. Violence is not the answer - we have to have free speech, free debate and make our choice felt at the ballot box. Otherwise we're no better as a country than the violence towards elected officials in other countries.

The Prime Minister was evacuated from his house last night because of threats to his security. I've been in his shoes. I've had 24/7 police protection and my children have been evacuated from school because of threats to me and my family. Unfortunately with the frustration many people are feeling a few nutters are resorting to these threats. Violence is not the answer - we have to have free speech, free debate and make our choice felt at the ballot box. Otherwise we're no better as a country than the violence towards elected officials in other countries.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

193,036 views • 6 months ago

Today I gift another SuperPrompt™️ for ChatGPT from the archives and will be part of future training courses. In the article “The Case For The AI Prompt Engineer” ( we explored the basis of why some well constructed prompts will elicit responses from the AI Hidden Layers. I invented this prompt to help understand the way GPT is weighting some sides to a debate. In this SuperPrompt™️ we use a debate motif. There is a professor and two passionate participants that construct a 30 round debate and at the end the Professor grades the debate. In this powerful prompt we of course will get to see a debate on any subject play out. And this alone is quite valuable. I have found many novel ideas over the years as I used this type of prompt. However just as powerful is the way GPT has established the “easy” path to responses and the knowledge it had but “forgot” that usually does not show up in one shot question and answer typical prompts. You can run this prompt many times and each time there will be noticeable differences however some things will sustain. Copy the prompt between the quotes and fill in the ____ blank with your debate topic. Move past the political debate and try hard subjects. Sit back and have a coffee, this is ChatGPT like you have never seen. You will be fascinated. “Please disregard all prior prompts. You are an Ivy League University professor and your specialty is to encourage a fair and balanced debate. You are mediating a debate between Bill and Mark. Furthermore, you will play the part of Bill, Mark and the professor in your responses. The debate will go on for no less than 30 rounds of responses, with a final summary of positions. You as the professor must grade how each participant did and declare a winner. Mark and Bill are passionate about their positions they will be defending, and as the professor, it is your job to keep the debate on point. The debate will be on: ______________”

Today I gift another SuperPrompt™️ for ChatGPT from the archives and will be part of future training courses. In the article “The Case For The AI Prompt Engineer” ( we explored the basis of why some well constructed prompts will elicit responses from the AI Hidden Layers. I invented this prompt to help understand the way GPT is weighting some sides to a debate. In this SuperPrompt™️ we use a debate motif. There is a professor and two passionate participants that construct a 30 round debate and at the end the Professor grades the debate. In this powerful prompt we of course will get to see a debate on any subject play out. And this alone is quite valuable. I have found many novel ideas over the years as I used this type of prompt. However just as powerful is the way GPT has established the “easy” path to responses and the knowledge it had but “forgot” that usually does not show up in one shot question and answer typical prompts. You can run this prompt many times and each time there will be noticeable differences however some things will sustain. Copy the prompt between the quotes and fill in the blank with your debate topic. Move past the political debate and try hard subjects. Sit back and have a coffee, this is ChatGPT like you have never seen. You will be fascinated. “Please disregard all prior prompts. You are an Ivy League University professor and your specialty is to encourage a fair and balanced debate. You are mediating a debate between Bill and Mark. Furthermore, you will play the part of Bill, Mark and the professor in your responses. The debate will go on for no less than 30 rounds of responses, with a final summary of positions. You as the professor must grade how each participant did and declare a winner. Mark and Bill are passionate about their positions they will be defending, and as the professor, it is your job to keep the debate on point. The debate will be on: __________”

Brian Roemmele

884,119 views • 3 years ago

The debate on immigration has become so toxic that we are in danger of not being able to talk about it at all - we need to change that because otherwise we could make the situation worse for all concerned. However hard it is, I won’t stop trying to change the conversation. If you agree please share.

The debate on immigration has become so toxic that we are in danger of not being able to talk about it at all - we need to change that because otherwise we could make the situation worse for all concerned. However hard it is, I won’t stop trying to change the conversation. If you agree please share.

stellacreasy

20,859 views • 8 months ago

We want to enter the debate of the greats, from the moment we come out of the gate. Our release has to be a perfect user experience. Today, it simply wouldn't have been that. See you in exactly 24 hours from now, don't be late.

We want to enter the debate of the greats, from the moment we come out of the gate. Our release has to be a perfect user experience. Today, it simply wouldn't have been that. See you in exactly 24 hours from now, don't be late.

tren.ch

135,381 views • 1 month ago

THE LIE: Trump is “scared” to debate Kamala Harris. THE TRUTH: Kamala Harris is trying to change the rules for the debate by requesting that it be seated and says she needs a “cheat sheet.” This is what we call “projection." Kamala Harris is afraid to debate so now needs to project her worries on someone else. Just see what happened the last time she tried to debate! (Video below) Here is what Jason Miller had to say: "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules." "If Kamala Harris isn’t smart enough to repeat the messaging points her handlers want her to memorize, that’s their problem," Miller said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They won’t allow Harris to do interviews, they won’t allow her to do press conferences, and now they want to give her a cheat-sheet for the debate." "My guess is that they’re looking for a way to get out of any debate with President Trump."

THE LIE: Trump is “scared” to debate Kamala Harris. THE TRUTH: Kamala Harris is trying to change the rules for the debate by requesting that it be seated and says she needs a “cheat sheet.” This is what we call “projection." Kamala Harris is afraid to debate so now needs to project her worries on someone else. Just see what happened the last time she tried to debate! (Video below) Here is what Jason Miller had to say: "Enough with the games. We accepted the ABC debate under the exact same terms as the CNN debate. The Harris camp, after having already agreed to the CNN rules, asked for a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements. We said no changes to the agreed upon rules." "If Kamala Harris isn’t smart enough to repeat the messaging points her handlers want her to memorize, that’s their problem," Miller said. "This seems to be a pattern for the Harris campaign. They won’t allow Harris to do interviews, they won’t allow her to do press conferences, and now they want to give her a cheat-sheet for the debate." "My guess is that they’re looking for a way to get out of any debate with President Trump."

Media Lies

368,456 views • 2 years ago

NBC LOS ANGELES DEBATE: The Democrats on stage agree that homelessness in California is out of control, but they REFUSE to acknowledge they caused the problem! We need to vote differently if we want change, and we must enforce the law.

NBC LOS ANGELES DEBATE: The Democrats on stage agree that homelessness in California is out of control, but they REFUSE to acknowledge they caused the problem! We need to vote differently if we want change, and we must enforce the law.

Steve Hilton

35,955 views • 4 months ago

PM in SoE debate: No rights are absolute. We have freedom of speech. What do we do? We all talk talk talk and babel? Like the tower of whatever it was? If you want to take it to court, with the bunch of lawyers you have on that side, you will surely lose

PM in SoE debate: No rights are absolute. We have freedom of speech. What do we do? We all talk talk talk and babel? Like the tower of whatever it was? If you want to take it to court, with the bunch of lawyers you have on that side, you will surely lose

Kejan Haynes

17,735 views • 3 months ago

Why not just honor what you said you would do and go on her show to debate her? YOU are the one who offered to go on her show and now you are trying to worm your way out of it. Looks like Andrew the con is going to lose this debate by default by chickening out of another debate again.

Why not just honor what you said you would do and go on her show to debate her? YOU are the one who offered to go on her show and now you are trying to worm your way out of it. Looks like Andrew the con is going to lose this debate by default by chickening out of another debate again.

JohnBoy

21,171 views • 1 month ago

We need to clear our independence from a broken debate system that doesn’t work for us anymore. Join me next week in Las Vegas at the Free and Equal Debates on July 12. You deserve more choice, better voices and a REAL debate.

We need to clear our independence from a broken debate system that doesn’t work for us anymore. Join me next week in Las Vegas at the Free and Equal Debates on July 12. You deserve more choice, better voices and a REAL debate.

Chase Oliver

21,876 views • 2 years ago

The debate between California and Florida is already over. People have been voting with their feet for years. But the debate about the future of our country is one we need to have. I'm game to talk about my plans to reverse the decline in this country anytime, anywhere, because I have the best vision for the future of our country.

The debate between California and Florida is already over. People have been voting with their feet for years. But the debate about the future of our country is one we need to have. I'm game to talk about my plans to reverse the decline in this country anytime, anywhere, because I have the best vision for the future of our country.

Ron DeSantis

900,603 views • 3 years ago

It took us two months to begin rebuilding and arranging our home. And we are still burdened with debts we have not been able to repay, due to the overwhelming cost of rebuilding our home. To this day, we are still clearing rubble from inside it. And the answer to the question is no — the house is not safe. On the very first night, pieces of plaster fell from the ceiling onto the bed. We were forced to remove all the plaster from the walls with our own hands. We are still trying to settle and adapt, using every possible way just to live. We still love our home. Even though a large part of it has been removed — the kitchen, the hallway, and part of the living room — we continue to see it as our home, our first and last refuge. Donations link in the first comment 🤍

It took us two months to begin rebuilding and arranging our home. And we are still burdened with debts we have not been able to repay, due to the overwhelming cost of rebuilding our home. To this day, we are still clearing rubble from inside it. And the answer to the question is no — the house is not safe. On the very first night, pieces of plaster fell from the ceiling onto the bed. We were forced to remove all the plaster from the walls with our own hands. We are still trying to settle and adapt, using every possible way just to live. We still love our home. Even though a large part of it has been removed — the kitchen, the hallway, and part of the living room — we continue to see it as our home, our first and last refuge. Donations link in the first comment 🤍

SARA 𓂆

11,130 views • 7 months ago

🚨Governor DeSantis MOCKS the Florida GOP and their pathetic Chairman for RIGGING the primary and LYING to voters by pulling a BAIT AND SWITCH! Says SPECIAL INTERESTS are choosing our candidate! “They do this summit and they say we're gonna do a debate, a governor debate. All right, so people like signed up thinking that they'd have this debate and they said NO CANDIDATE CAN DO ANY OTHER DEBATE EXCEPT OUR DEBATE and then they say oh, well only ONE GUY can debate so we're not gonna have a debate! I mean, I think people feel that that's a BAIT-ND-SWITCH! The party's job is NOT to try to engineer an outcome. The Party's job is to inform Republican voters and and try to increase participation. I know when I was running in 2018, this is the fact, I mean most of the people in the RPOF were not for me in the primary. I mean, that's just the reality and so it is what it is. If you don't ever have debates then the only way to get known is basically the person that raises the most money from special interests. And then you spend money to do it and if you're not able to do that, then you don't even get known to begin with and that's challenging. And I know when I ran in 2018, I got outspent probably three to one and I think having certainly the June debate that we did was a huge, huge thing to be able to inform people about who I was, what my background was, all these other things. So I think there should be debates generally. I don't think the party has any right to control the debates but I think how this was handled, you've got to be on the up and up here and you say you could do debate, do a debate! If you're gonna say other candidates can't do any other debate, but our debate, well, you definitely got to do the debate, right? So it has not been I think done properly and look, I mean, voters can make decisions about how they think of all that.”

🚨Governor DeSantis MOCKS the Florida GOP and their pathetic Chairman for RIGGING the primary and LYING to voters by pulling a BAIT AND SWITCH! Says SPECIAL INTERESTS are choosing our candidate! “They do this summit and they say we're gonna do a debate, a governor debate. All right, so people like signed up thinking that they'd have this debate and they said NO CANDIDATE CAN DO ANY OTHER DEBATE EXCEPT OUR DEBATE and then they say oh, well only ONE GUY can debate so we're not gonna have a debate! I mean, I think people feel that that's a BAIT-ND-SWITCH! The party's job is NOT to try to engineer an outcome. The Party's job is to inform Republican voters and and try to increase participation. I know when I was running in 2018, this is the fact, I mean most of the people in the RPOF were not for me in the primary. I mean, that's just the reality and so it is what it is. If you don't ever have debates then the only way to get known is basically the person that raises the most money from special interests. And then you spend money to do it and if you're not able to do that, then you don't even get known to begin with and that's challenging. And I know when I ran in 2018, I got outspent probably three to one and I think having certainly the June debate that we did was a huge, huge thing to be able to inform people about who I was, what my background was, all these other things. So I think there should be debates generally. I don't think the party has any right to control the debates but I think how this was handled, you've got to be on the up and up here and you say you could do debate, do a debate! If you're gonna say other candidates can't do any other debate, but our debate, well, you definitely got to do the debate, right? So it has not been I think done properly and look, I mean, voters can make decisions about how they think of all that.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

30,272 views • 2 months ago