Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

UPDATE 🚨 Remember the surgeon who was PULLED OUT OF SURGERY to speak with UnitedHealthcare so they could try and cancel her cancer patients inpatient stay after surgery? UnitedHealthcare DID CANCEL THE HOSPITAL STAY and now they’re THREATENING HER, she’s showing the proof “Despite my efforts, they denied her...

8,436,013 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Cash Loren
Cash Lorenvor 1 Jahr

This is truly evil

Profilbild von WeShare
WeSharevor 1 Jahr

Say goodbye to outdated healthcare plans, find a health solution that fits your future.

Profilbild von aka
akavor 1 Jahr

Absolutely insane

Profilbild von A.G. (human)
A.G. (human)vor 1 Jahr

Horrible. Remember the insurance companies only care about $$$.

Profilbild von Cloud
Cloudvor 1 Jahr

Let’s spread the word. F these tyrannical fcks.

Profilbild von Tiffany Virili
Tiffany Virilivor 1 Jahr

We, the People, demand RETRIBUTION

Profilbild von Burning Bunny
Burning Bunnyvor 1 Jahr

This should make the lawsuit juicy! Hang in there Doc! You will come out on top. Have faith. NEVER DOUBT!

Profilbild von Priyanshu Jha | System Guy
Priyanshu Jha | System Guyvor 1 Jahr

This is outrageous. Insurance companies shouldn't interfere with patient care like this.

Profilbild von CaptMeticuli
CaptMeticulivor 1 Jahr

This is ridiculously unconscionable.

Profilbild von Lori Heyer-Bednar
Lori Heyer-Bednarvor 1 Jahr

The healthcare in the US needs to be dismantled and replaced!

Profilbild von 🅱️
🅱️vor 1 Jahr

Next do dental bills

Ähnliche Videos

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Update on the viral Dr. Elisabeth Potter / UnitedHealthcare story (Jan 2025 → April 2026) Remember this? Austin breast reconstruction surgeon Dr. Elisabeth Potter (@drelisabethpotter) was pulled mid-surgery from a DIEP flap procedure on an anesthetized breast cancer patient to take a UnitedHealthcare call. They demanded she personally justify an overnight hospital stay for a surgery that was already pre-approved. 2/5 The video went mega-viral and sparked nationwide outrage about insurance companies interfering with cancer care. New prior-auth rules were forcing surgeons themselves to handle these calls or risk denial. 3/5 What happened next: Dr. Potter says UnitedHealthcare retaliated by refusing to add her outpatient RedBud Surgery Center to their in-network list. This has caused major financial strain, delayed/canceled cases, and nearly threatened her practice. 4/5 She received a threatening lawyer letter from UHC but refused to stay silent. A U.S. Congressman even wrote to them. She launched a GoFundMe (backed by Bill Ackman & thousands of others) that raised hundreds of thousands to keep RedBud open. 5/5 April 2026 update (as of this week): The dispute is still ongoing. Just days ago she posted that multiple cancer cases had to be canceled again because UHC still won’t approve her surgery center — even when the OR was available and safe. She’s contracted with other insurers and continues operating + speaking out.

Victor Bigham 🇺🇸

188,018 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

INSANE 🚨 This surgeon has a patient who needs a “deep flap” surgery. Insurance denied it To appeal she had to speak to her patients insurance. “I actually asked, do you know what a deep flap is? THE DOCTOR SAID NO.” The insurance companies deciding if Americans get their procedures DONT EVEN KNOW what the procedures are. How is this okay?! THIS is the state of American healthcare… “You may remember I had a patient who needs a deep flap, and the insurance company denied an inpatient stay for her. So I had to schedule a peer to peer call and schedule time out of my day to ask for a conversation directly with someone who is my peer to discuss deep flap surgery and why that patient needed to be overnight. That call was scheduled for 11AM, and eleven came around 11: 30, 11: 45 and no call still. And then we emailed the insurance company because, of course, they don't give me the call number. They only let me receive the call. So finally at 12: 15, I received the call that was initially scheduled for 11. And the doctor who called me was not a surgeon. And I actually asked the doctor, do you know what a deep flap is? And the doctor said no. So that's where we are. My patient has insurance. She's seeing someone who's fellowship trained in microsurgery, me, to do her breast reconstruction, and I'm having to teach another doctor what a deep flap is in order to justify her overnight stay to navigate her insurance. This is completely ridiculous.”

Wall Street Apes

1,292,535 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

My last case of 2025 and my first case of 2026 tell you everything you need to know about our healthcare system. Last week, I was scheduled to do a DIEP flap for a patient who had been waiting a long time. We had asked her insurance company if we could do the surgery in network at @Redbudsurgerycenter, where we have everything needed to safely and efficiently take care of her. They hadn’t approved that, so the surgery had to be scheduled at an older hospital in town. When we arrived, the hospital was having HVAC issues. The humidity levels were not safe for surgery. We waited for hours, and ultimately the case had to be canceled. It wasn’t just her surgery. Multiple surgeries were canceled that day because operating under those conditions would have been a fire risk. We weren’t able to reschedule her surgery before the end of the year, which means her deductible resets. I could have safely done her surgery at Redbud that day but insurance rules wouldn’t allow it. This is what closed networks and rigid systems look like in real life. Now here’s the contrast. The first case I’m doing in 2026 is also a woman who needs breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. This time, instead of traditional insurance, her employer uses a third party administrator. They came to me directly and asked what I would charge if they paid fairly and transparently. On Monday, we’re doing her bilateral DIEP flap at @Redbudsurgerycenter. I can control the environment, the costs, and the care. It’s better for the patient and significantly less expensive for the employer. This is called Direct Specialty Care. It’s not direct primary care. It’s specialty care delivered without unnecessary barriers. It’s happening. We’re starting the year this way. And I’m going to keep pushing the boundaries and keeping you informed.

Elisabeth Potter MD

136,464 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten