Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 UPDATE: Rep. Nancy Mace says Lindsay Clancy needs a PUBLIC EXECUTION "She mrdered her kids. Lindsay Clancy doesn't deserve to live." 💯 Why is this controversial? Why is capital punishment for a kller MORE CONTROVERSIAL than the woman who did the k*lling?! Reconvene the jury and convict on... show more

Eric Daugherty

1,188,149 subscribers

48,108 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

More than 25,000 people have donated over $835,000 to a GoFundMe for Lindsay Clancy, who admitted to killing her three young children The fundraiser has also been flooded with messages from supporters who believe Clancy is a victim and are defending her actions

More than 25,000 people have donated over $835,000 to a GoFundMe for Lindsay Clancy, who admitted to killing her three young children The fundraiser has also been flooded with messages from supporters who believe Clancy is a victim and are defending her actions

Unlimited L's

11,773 views • 1 month ago

JUST IN: Kevin Reddington gives a blunt response when asked how Lindsay Clancy is holding up as the jury continues deliberating her fate. REPORTER: "What's been the hardest part about this for you?" REDDINGTON: "Worrying about Lindsay." REPORTER: "And how is she?" REDDINGTON: "She's not good."

JUST IN: Kevin Reddington gives a blunt response when asked how Lindsay Clancy is holding up as the jury continues deliberating her fate. REPORTER: "What's been the hardest part about this for you?" REDDINGTON: "Worrying about Lindsay." REPORTER: "And how is she?" REDDINGTON: "She's not good."

Fox News

363,011 views • 19 days ago

Meet Jennifer Lucas, a Maryland healthcare professional who says anyone who believes Lindsay Clancy is guilty is the one who needs psychiatric help. She also claims that people who call Patrick Clancy innocent are the same people who wore masks while driving alone in 2020. It’s scary to think that people like this are working in healthcare.

Meet Jennifer Lucas, a Maryland healthcare professional who says anyone who believes Lindsay Clancy is guilty is the one who needs psychiatric help. She also claims that people who call Patrick Clancy innocent are the same people who wore masks while driving alone in 2020. It’s scary to think that people like this are working in healthcare.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

398,336 views • 16 days ago

🚨 UPDATE: Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) says the lone male juror who held out and forced a Lindsay Clancy mistrial will need SECURITY "Holdout juror’s going to need security." 💯 I REALLY hope the radical jurors and the defense attorney don't try to destroy that man's life. The Clancy Cartel will NOT be happy with that patriot. Pray for him 🙏🏻

🚨 UPDATE: Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) says the lone male juror who held out and forced a Lindsay Clancy mistrial will need SECURITY "Holdout juror’s going to need security." 💯 I REALLY hope the radical jurors and the defense attorney don't try to destroy that man's life. The Clancy Cartel will NOT be happy with that patriot. Pray for him 🙏🏻

Eric Daugherty

50,730 views • 16 days ago

🚨 BREAKING: Kevin Reddington asks President Trump to consider pardoning Lindsay Clancy. “Mr. President, I would hope that you would consider this young lady and the person she is, what she’s been through, and consider a pardon.” Just days ago, Trump said Clancy “did a horrible, horrible thing.”

🚨 BREAKING: Kevin Reddington asks President Trump to consider pardoning Lindsay Clancy. “Mr. President, I would hope that you would consider this young lady and the person she is, what she’s been through, and consider a pardon.” Just days ago, Trump said Clancy “did a horrible, horrible thing.”

Lindsay 🇺🇸

16,676 views • 13 days ago

This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, had LITERALLY just been board certified on September 12, 2022 (just 3 days before her first visit with Lindsay Clancy). This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, had NEVER met Lindsay Clancy in person before August 7, 2026 (ALMOST 4 YEARS LATER) This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts was falsely advertising her “interests” as areas of expertise This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts has never used the “Edinburgh Scale” (which is a scale that rates levels of depressing and the severity of the symptoms) This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts picked and chose what to document in detail in her notes, other wise a good ol’ check of the box is a-okay for her This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts prescribes medicines and controlled substances to the mentally unwell in our society This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts claimed under oath that she “didn’t know why Lindsay came in to see her” This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts did her job, sure, TO THE BARE MINIMUM.. and for that she absolutely IS NEGLIGENT HERE! (even if she doesn’t believe so) aaaand it is OF MY OPINION, that she has some culpability in this case. SURE every medical professional has to start out somewhere, OBVIOUSLY, but maybe JUST MAYBE.. someone who did their schooling/residency through the covid era should have consulted with someone who was used to SEEING actual patients IN PERSON, when she decided to take Lindsay on as a client. Given she was so new, no ethical peer of hers would have turned down an opportunity to help and offer a consult atleast. The fact she has NEVER met Lindsay in person before last Friday is beyond scary to me.. Telehealth in general is scary to me! You absolutely cannot (I WILL DIE ON THIS HILL) properly diagnose or treat someone PRIMARILY or ENTIRELY over a screen visit, I am sorry, you just can’t! And if “telehealth” “through the television” (as KShred would say) is the future of Mental Healthcare, we are fucked!! WE WILL SEE MORE OF THIS IN THE FUTURE! “May God Save The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts” #LindsayClancyTrial ⚖️🇺🇸 #KShred #KevinShreddington

This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, had LITERALLY just been board certified on September 12, 2022 (just 3 days before her first visit with Lindsay Clancy). This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, had NEVER met Lindsay Clancy in person before August 7, 2026 (ALMOST 4 YEARS LATER) This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts was falsely advertising her “interests” as areas of expertise This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts has never used the “Edinburgh Scale” (which is a scale that rates levels of depressing and the severity of the symptoms) This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts picked and chose what to document in detail in her notes, other wise a good ol’ check of the box is a-okay for her This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts prescribes medicines and controlled substances to the mentally unwell in our society This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts claimed under oath that she “didn’t know why Lindsay came in to see her” This woman, Dr. Jennifer Tufts did her job, sure, TO THE BARE MINIMUM.. and for that she absolutely IS NEGLIGENT HERE! (even if she doesn’t believe so) aaaand it is OF MY OPINION, that she has some culpability in this case. SURE every medical professional has to start out somewhere, OBVIOUSLY, but maybe JUST MAYBE.. someone who did their schooling/residency through the covid era should have consulted with someone who was used to SEEING actual patients IN PERSON, when she decided to take Lindsay on as a client. Given she was so new, no ethical peer of hers would have turned down an opportunity to help and offer a consult atleast. The fact she has NEVER met Lindsay in person before last Friday is beyond scary to me.. Telehealth in general is scary to me! You absolutely cannot (I WILL DIE ON THIS HILL) properly diagnose or treat someone PRIMARILY or ENTIRELY over a screen visit, I am sorry, you just can’t! And if “telehealth” “through the television” (as KShred would say) is the future of Mental Healthcare, we are fucked!! WE WILL SEE MORE OF THIS IN THE FUTURE! “May God Save The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts” #LindsayClancyTrial ⚖️🇺🇸 #KShred #KevinShreddington

Jennnnie “The Soothsayer” Cochran*

27,677 views • 1 month ago

CNN’s Van Jones lies about the m*rder of Iryna Zarutska and says the word “white” was never mentioned by anyone except Charlie Kirk. The k*ller said twice, “I got that white girl.” Jones must apologize. This was a racially charged crime. Black-on-white crime is an epidemic.

CNN’s Van Jones lies about the mrder of Iryna Zarutska and says the word “white” was never mentioned by anyone except Charlie Kirk. The kller said twice, “I got that white girl.” Jones must apologize. This was a racially charged crime. Black-on-white crime is an epidemic.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

4,214,155 views • 1 year ago

🚨#BREAKING: The Black male in Detroit who was caught on camera sh00ting at and k*lling a woman outside of a liquor store and injuring 1 other has been arrested. He is a 15 year old boy, Isaiah Gordon. Police say the Aug. 21 sh00ting on East Warren Avenue k*lled 65-year-old Faith Williams and injured a 29-year-old woman. Gordon faces first-degree m*rder, three counts of assault with intent to m*rder and four felony-firearm charges. Prosecutors allege he ALSO sh0t at a PASSING VEHICLE before fleeing. Gordon was arraigned Saturday and remanded to the Juvenile Detention Facility. His case will proceed in adult court.

🚨#BREAKING: The Black male in Detroit who was caught on camera sh00ting at and klling a woman outside of a liquor store and injuring 1 other has been arrested. He is a 15 year old boy, Isaiah Gordon. Police say the Aug. 21 sh00ting on East Warren Avenue klled 65-year-old Faith Williams and injured a 29-year-old woman. Gordon faces first-degree mrder, three counts of assault with intent to mrder and four felony-firearm charges. Prosecutors allege he ALSO sh0t at a PASSING VEHICLE before fleeing. Gordon was arraigned Saturday and remanded to the Juvenile Detention Facility. His case will proceed in adult court.

Matt Van Swol

1,303,513 views • 21 days ago

Falsely accusing a grieving father of murdering his own children is absolutely disgusting. Shame on Lisa Rinna for her ignorant and defamatory words. Unbelievable that she still hasn’t apologized and issued a full and sincere retraction. Patrick Clancy should sue her. Rinna didn’t just levy an opinion. She made a reckless and defamatory statement. Lindsay Clancy has already admitted she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. The jury is deciding responsibility, not who did it. Yet Rinna still looked into a phone in her car and said Patrick did it, because “women typically don’t strangle,” and because a therapist supposedly nodded along. Then the blowback came and she hid behind free speech instead of an apology. Her page. Her opinions. Tough luck. Free speech is the right to say something stupid. It is not a shield from being wrong, and it is not a license to smear a man who came home to three dead children. Patrick Clancy lost Cora, Dawson, and Callan. He does not owe Rinna a debate. She owes him a retraction. A celebrity does not get to turn a father’s name into content because the real killer is a mother and that is less convenient for the story she wanted. Rinna needs to name the children. Tell the truth about who killed them. And stop inventing a villain because the real one is a mother.

Falsely accusing a grieving father of murdering his own children is absolutely disgusting. Shame on Lisa Rinna for her ignorant and defamatory words. Unbelievable that she still hasn’t apologized and issued a full and sincere retraction. Patrick Clancy should sue her. Rinna didn’t just levy an opinion. She made a reckless and defamatory statement. Lindsay Clancy has already admitted she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. The jury is deciding responsibility, not who did it. Yet Rinna still looked into a phone in her car and said Patrick did it, because “women typically don’t strangle,” and because a therapist supposedly nodded along. Then the blowback came and she hid behind free speech instead of an apology. Her page. Her opinions. Tough luck. Free speech is the right to say something stupid. It is not a shield from being wrong, and it is not a license to smear a man who came home to three dead children. Patrick Clancy lost Cora, Dawson, and Callan. He does not owe Rinna a debate. She owes him a retraction. A celebrity does not get to turn a father’s name into content because the real killer is a mother and that is less convenient for the story she wanted. Rinna needs to name the children. Tell the truth about who killed them. And stop inventing a villain because the real one is a mother.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

13,367 views • 18 days ago

HAPPENING NOW: A bizarre cult of feminist, Lindsay Clancy supporters dressed in pink gathered outside Court Thursday in support of the woman who strangled her three small children to death. This is the satanic death cult of Moloch in action! Deranged leftist white women are a cancer destroying the West..

HAPPENING NOW: A bizarre cult of feminist, Lindsay Clancy supporters dressed in pink gathered outside Court Thursday in support of the woman who strangled her three small children to death. This is the satanic death cult of Moloch in action! Deranged leftist white women are a cancer destroying the West..

Alex Jones

169,899 views • 1 month ago

Lindsay Clancy I was so disappointed in Dr. Resnick's testimony. This is why. 1 - His age. He is 88 and while he seemed lucid of course, he seemed confused about where he conducted the interview. He said Duxbury and the defense attorney had to lead him that is was conducted in Tewksbury. He wasn't even well enough to travel to testify. 2 - He didn't interview Lindsay until 4 months after the murders. How in the World could he evaluate her mental state from January when he talked to her in May and for only 3 hours. 3 - Lindsay was medicated when he interviewed her. ** You can't interview someone who is medicated and rely on the results...Ever. a court won't even take a plea from a medicated person. The balance of justice for Callan, Dawson, and Cora can't be in relying on statements from a medicated woman who killed her kids months an interview. Plus, the voices assertion came up after the crime, not before. 4 - He Never spoke with her husband, only her parents and for less than 2 hours. She didn't live with her parents. Her husband would have been the best one to know her statement of mind leading up to the occurrence. ** I wonder why he didn't interview Patrick. Red flag! 5 - I don't agree with Dr. Resnick's conclusions not because he isn't knowledgeable about psychiatry, but because he isn't knowledgeable about Lindsay! #LindsayClancy

Lindsay Clancy I was so disappointed in Dr. Resnick's testimony. This is why. 1 - His age. He is 88 and while he seemed lucid of course, he seemed confused about where he conducted the interview. He said Duxbury and the defense attorney had to lead him that is was conducted in Tewksbury. He wasn't even well enough to travel to testify. 2 - He didn't interview Lindsay until 4 months after the murders. How in the World could he evaluate her mental state from January when he talked to her in May and for only 3 hours. 3 - Lindsay was medicated when he interviewed her. You can't interview someone who is medicated and rely on the results...Ever. a court won't even take a plea from a medicated person. The balance of justice for Callan, Dawson, and Cora can't be in relying on statements from a medicated woman who killed her kids months an interview. Plus, the voices assertion came up after the crime, not before. 4 - He Never spoke with her husband, only her parents and for less than 2 hours. She didn't live with her parents. Her husband would have been the best one to know her statement of mind leading up to the occurrence. I wonder why he didn't interview Patrick. Red flag! 5 - I don't agree with Dr. Resnick's conclusions not because he isn't knowledgeable about psychiatry, but because he isn't knowledgeable about Lindsay! #LindsayClancy

Jennifer Coffindaffer

105,164 views • 1 month ago

JUST IN: Rep. Cory Mills reacts after fellow GOP Rep. Nancy Mace moves to expel him from the House. "This is a woman who continues to try and go after and attack people because she thinks it's good for clickbait on social media, and for the simple concept of sensationalizing something that she can fundraise off of."

JUST IN: Rep. Cory Mills reacts after fellow GOP Rep. Nancy Mace moves to expel him from the House. "This is a woman who continues to try and go after and attack people because she thinks it's good for clickbait on social media, and for the simple concept of sensationalizing something that she can fundraise off of."

Fox News

170,326 views • 5 months ago

Dr. Jennifer Tufts testified that during her appointment with Lindsay Clancy on 1/23, she found her insight to be poor. Dr. Tufts explained that "it had to do with her over attribution" of her symptoms to medications, like believing Seroquel (quetiapine) made her depressed - when "in reality, she was just depressed." However, just a month earlier (12/21), when Lindsay tried to enter the Rhode Island Women & Infants Partial Hospitalization Program, she was told she was "not suitable" because her depression was "more pharmacologically induced than purely depressive." What’s wild is that the jury hasn't even heard this. The prosecution brought up the program during Lindsay’s arraignment and questioned Patrick Clancy about it. But when defense attorney Kevin Reddington tried to ask Patrick about it on cross, the state objected - claiming they didn't even have a copy of the Rhode Island medical records. 🤔

Dr. Jennifer Tufts testified that during her appointment with Lindsay Clancy on 1/23, she found her insight to be poor. Dr. Tufts explained that "it had to do with her over attribution" of her symptoms to medications, like believing Seroquel (quetiapine) made her depressed - when "in reality, she was just depressed." However, just a month earlier (12/21), when Lindsay tried to enter the Rhode Island Women & Infants Partial Hospitalization Program, she was told she was "not suitable" because her depression was "more pharmacologically induced than purely depressive." What’s wild is that the jury hasn't even heard this. The prosecution brought up the program during Lindsay’s arraignment and questioned Patrick Clancy about it. But when defense attorney Kevin Reddington tried to ask Patrick about it on cross, the state objected - claiming they didn't even have a copy of the Rhode Island medical records. 🤔

Ivanka Gog

133,577 views • 1 month ago

📍 Tewksbury, MA Video someone sent me this morning, asking if this was a stand out for “Lindsay Clancy, the mom who killed her kids.” I wish I could say with certainty that it was to honor Cora, Dawson and Callan. But sadly, I think we all know the answer.

📍 Tewksbury, MA Video someone sent me this morning, asking if this was a stand out for “Lindsay Clancy, the mom who killed her kids.” I wish I could say with certainty that it was to honor Cora, Dawson and Callan. But sadly, I think we all know the answer.

jenna rocco

18,587 views • 1 month ago

This is your brain on TikTok. Defending a murderer because vibes. You don't know, but you know know. A TikTok account called theleahfiles is running a series claiming Patrick Clancy is a psychopath who's about to be exposed, telling people to follow the money. Patrick's wife, Lindsay Clancy, strangled their three kids in Duxbury back in January 2023, so there's now a chunk of TikTok trying to redirect blame onto him instead of her.

This is your brain on TikTok. Defending a murderer because vibes. You don't know, but you know know. A TikTok account called theleahfiles is running a series claiming Patrick Clancy is a psychopath who's about to be exposed, telling people to follow the money. Patrick's wife, Lindsay Clancy, strangled their three kids in Duxbury back in January 2023, so there's now a chunk of TikTok trying to redirect blame onto him instead of her.

Ian Miles

23,134 views • 1 month ago

Can someone tell me why the defense attorney and that murderer are laughing when the jury couldn’t come up with a verdict? Lindsay Clancy killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. That is not in dispute. The only fight left is whether the law will hold her criminally responsible. The jury has now deadlocked twice. The judge just gave them the Tuey-Rodriguez charge—the last-resort “keep trying” instruction. None of that changes what happened in that basement. Do not forget the dead.

Can someone tell me why the defense attorney and that murderer are laughing when the jury couldn’t come up with a verdict? Lindsay Clancy killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. That is not in dispute. The only fight left is whether the law will hold her criminally responsible. The jury has now deadlocked twice. The judge just gave them the Tuey-Rodriguez charge—the last-resort “keep trying” instruction. None of that changes what happened in that basement. Do not forget the dead.

Trump Girl

14,689 views • 18 days ago

🚨 Possible verdicts in the Lindsay Clancy trial The jury in the Lindsay Clancy case (Plymouth Superior Court) is now deliberating three counts of first-degree murder. Because she has admitted causing the deaths, the main question is whether she was criminally responsible and, if so, which level of homicide applies. Massachusetts has no death penalty. For each child the verdict slip gives these options: 🚨1. Guilty of first-degree murder Requires proof of either deliberate premeditation or extreme atrocity/cruelty (or both). This is a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole. 🚨2. Guilty of second-degree murder The jury finds she caused the deaths with malice (intent to kill, intent to cause grievous bodily harm, or an act a reasonable person would know created a plain and strong likelihood of death) but without the extra first-degree elements. Sentence is life with the possibility of parole. 🚨3. Guilty of manslaughter A lesser included offense the judge allowed the jury to consider. This would mean the deaths resulted from wanton or reckless conduct rather than murder. Maximum sentence is 20 years per count; the judge decides whether sentences run concurrently or consecutively. 🚨4. Not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility (NCR) The defense theory: she had a mental disease or defect (postpartum psychosis) that left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or to conform her conduct to the law. The prosecution must disprove this beyond a reasonable doubt. An NCR verdict is an acquittal on the criminal charges, but it triggers civil commitment to a secure psychiatric facility under Massachusetts law. She would not simply walk free. The 12 deliberating jurors must be unanimous on each count. A hung jury on any count would produce a mistrial on that charge and the possibility of a retrial.

🚨 Possible verdicts in the Lindsay Clancy trial The jury in the Lindsay Clancy case (Plymouth Superior Court) is now deliberating three counts of first-degree murder. Because she has admitted causing the deaths, the main question is whether she was criminally responsible and, if so, which level of homicide applies. Massachusetts has no death penalty. For each child the verdict slip gives these options: 🚨1. Guilty of first-degree murder Requires proof of either deliberate premeditation or extreme atrocity/cruelty (or both). This is a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole. 🚨2. Guilty of second-degree murder The jury finds she caused the deaths with malice (intent to kill, intent to cause grievous bodily harm, or an act a reasonable person would know created a plain and strong likelihood of death) but without the extra first-degree elements. Sentence is life with the possibility of parole. 🚨3. Guilty of manslaughter A lesser included offense the judge allowed the jury to consider. This would mean the deaths resulted from wanton or reckless conduct rather than murder. Maximum sentence is 20 years per count; the judge decides whether sentences run concurrently or consecutively. 🚨4. Not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility (NCR) The defense theory: she had a mental disease or defect (postpartum psychosis) that left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or to conform her conduct to the law. The prosecution must disprove this beyond a reasonable doubt. An NCR verdict is an acquittal on the criminal charges, but it triggers civil commitment to a secure psychiatric facility under Massachusetts law. She would not simply walk free. The 12 deliberating jurors must be unanimous on each count. A hung jury on any count would produce a mistrial on that charge and the possibility of a retrial.

Trump Girl

13,283 views • 24 days ago

🚨#BREAKING: A mother in Memphis TN has been charged with m*rder after she sh0t a 20-year-old man she found hiding under her CHILD'S BED at 1:45 a.m. When the mother was asked why she did it, she said: "I did what I had to do."

🚨#BREAKING: A mother in Memphis TN has been charged with m*rder after she sh0t a 20-year-old man she found hiding under her CHILD'S BED at 1:45 a.m. When the mother was asked why she did it, she said: "I did what I had to do."

Matt Van Swol

7,375,580 views • 2 months ago

Glamour contributor winks at the camera during the Lindsay Clancy trial. Clancy is on trial for murdering her three children by strangling them with exercise bands, and Brittany Romano thought it was a good time to give the camera a wink. Romano is now lashing out against people criticizing her. "You know what I love? A bunch of randos at home judging as if they know if a camera pans in or out and think we all care. I don’t," she said on Threads.

Glamour contributor winks at the camera during the Lindsay Clancy trial. Clancy is on trial for murdering her three children by strangling them with exercise bands, and Brittany Romano thought it was a good time to give the camera a wink. Romano is now lashing out against people criticizing her. "You know what I love? A bunch of randos at home judging as if they know if a camera pans in or out and think we all care. I don’t," she said on Threads.

Collin Rugg

436,503 views • 27 days ago

Vanity Fair drops journalist Brittany Romano after video of her smiling, posing and winking at a courtroom camera during the Lindsay Clancy murder trial explodes across social media. The magazine says Romano was credentialed to write a personal essay about growing up with Clancy, but it is now cutting ties after what it calls "clear conflicts with our editorial standards and processes." Romano defended her behavior amid the backlash, saying she smiles through anxiety and has "nothing to apologize for."

Vanity Fair drops journalist Brittany Romano after video of her smiling, posing and winking at a courtroom camera during the Lindsay Clancy murder trial explodes across social media. The magazine says Romano was credentialed to write a personal essay about growing up with Clancy, but it is now cutting ties after what it calls "clear conflicts with our editorial standards and processes." Romano defended her behavior amid the backlash, saying she smiles through anxiety and has "nothing to apologize for."

Fox News

1,338,573 views • 25 days ago