Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
🚨🇺🇸 U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie is on fire 🔥 Jess Staley Leon Black Les Wexner David Copperfield Lapo Elkann Tom Pritzker Glenn Dubin Frederick Vekhay Eduardo Teodorani Jean-Luc Brunel Daniel Humm Ramsey Al-Khouri Prince Andrew Leslie Groff He named them as Epstein co-conspirators who should be investigated & prosecuted.... show more
11,795 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 0
Нет доступных комментариев
Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста
Похожие видео
![🔥 Thomas Massie calls for investigation into Leslie Wexner as an Epstein "co-conspirator" in "an underage sex-trafficking case" "Leslie Wexner was listed on the FBI's own documents as a co-conspirator in an underage sex-trafficking case" "How did you go from deciding that Leslie Wexner was a co-conspirator to not even talking to him?" "What was the evidence that you found that exonerated him from any suspicion? They haven't given us those documents" "Until I challenged them online in a social media post, they have redacted the fact that Leslie Wexner's name was on that list of co-conspirator's of Jeffrey Epstein" "I believe there's enough evidence in there [the Epstein Files], even among the unredacted files, to start investigations on Leon Black, Jes Staley, and Leslie Wexner" This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie), a U.S. representative for Kentucky's 4th congressional district, is taken from a conversation with Alex Newman (@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU_) of The New American (The New American) posted to YouTube on April 20, 2026.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2048877476252955120/amplify_video_thumb/2048874772164136960/img/aq_J9C2ZQLuhyt94.jpg)
1:19
Sensitive content
🔥 Thomas Massie calls for investigation into Leslie Wexner as an Epstein "co-conspirator" in "an underage sex-trafficking case" "Leslie Wexner was listed on the FBI's own documents as a co-conspirator in an underage sex-trafficking case" "How did you go from deciding that Leslie Wexner was a co-conspirator to not even talking to him?" "What was the evidence that you found that exonerated him from any suspicion? They haven't given us those documents" "Until I challenged them online in a social media post, they have redacted the fact that Leslie Wexner's name was on that list of co-conspirator's of Jeffrey Epstein" "I believe there's enough evidence in there [the Epstein Files], even among the unredacted files, to start investigations on Leon Black, Jes Staley, and Leslie Wexner" This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie), a U.S. representative for Kentucky's 4th congressional district, is taken from a conversation with Alex Newman (@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU_) of The New American (The New American) posted to YouTube on April 20, 2026.
Sense Receptor
23,327 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад
![.Thomas Massie on Epstein: "[Trump] has been trying to protect his friends like Howard Lutnick, who ... was a bald faced liar just weeks before we got the files released ... But more importantly, there are enough names in there — you know, Leslie Wexner, Leon Black, Jes Staley — these are people who are mentioned in there. You’re innocent until proven guilty in this country. But there’s enough information there that there need to be investigations like there have been across the world. "I mean, there’s the prince of England is no longer a prince. The ambassador from Britain to the United States is now gone. The former prime minister of Norway is being investigated. It’s happening everywhere except for the United States."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2077724356596088908/amplify_video_thumb/2077724132565782528/img/WOaSIrRM7DR1KLRP.jpg)
![Failure To Release Epstein Files “Could Cost Us The Majority,” Worry Republicans “The people telling the president he could stop this [legislation] gave him awful advice,” says member of Congress Many in the MAGA movement responded with outrage and upset last July, following President Trump’s declaration in a cabinet meeting, and in subsequent social media posts, that there was nothing of importance in the large number of Jeffrey Epstein files that the FBI and Department of Justice are still holding. Those files allegedly include the names of individuals who participated in or were trapped in a sex blackmail operation tied to the US Intelligence Community, the CIA, and Israeli intelligence. Now, Rep. Thomas Massie’s (R-Ky.) is close to gathering a final needed 218th signature on a “discharge petition,” which would require a vote on the H.R.4405 - Epstein Files Transparency Act. That Act would mandate the FBI and Justice Department release the Epstein files as early as next month. The legislation explicitly states that personal embarrassment is not a reason for the FBI or DOJ to withhold documents from the public. “This vote is coming,” a Republican member of Congress told Public, “and it will pass the House with flying colors. This is inevitable. The people telling the president he could stop this gave him awful advice.” All of the individuals who spoke to Public were Republicans, and several suggested they feared the impact of the White House’s strategy on their party. “This is sucking the air out of the room and taking attention away from the other great things the administration is doing,” one member of the Republican conference said. Said another, “This is the behavior that could cost us the majority.” These comments were made to Public before the release of an interview with a former Justice Department investigator who claimed, to an undercover reporter working with James O’Keefe, that former President Bill Clinton was on Epstein’s plane when girls were being raped, and that Epstein worked for both the CIA and the Israeli government. In response to a query from Public, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said, “Democrats and the media knew about Epstein and his victims for years and did nothing to help them while President Trump was calling for transparency, and is now delivering on it with thousands of pages of documents as part of the ongoing Oversight investigation.” It is possible that the Files do not contain any significant new information. FBI Director Kash Patel last week told the Senate that he had no evidence that Epstein was trafficking women for anyone other than himself. And some journalists have pointed out inconsistencies in claims made by alleged Epstein victims. But if there is nothing of significance in the Epstein Files, then it is not clear why the Trump administration has sought to prevent their release. The explanation from the Trump administration for why the files can’t be released has shifted. Patel told Congress that the Epstein files were constrained by limited search warrants from 2006 to 2007, and that non-prosecution agreements hindered future investigations. However, those constraints only apply to the Southern District of Florida, not to the Southern District of New York. Epstein had homes in both states. In the hearing, Rep. Massie said he had evidence that the FBI had documents naming at least 20 men, including Jess Staley, CEO of Barclay’s Bank, and a “Hollywood producer worth a few hundred million dollars, one royal prince, one high profile individual in the music industry, one very prominent banker, one high profile government official, one high profile former politician, one owner of a car company in Italy, one rock star, one magician, at least six billionaires.” In August, the New York Times published photographs showing two hidden surveillance cameras in Epstein’s New York apartment. One of them pointed at a bed in a bedroom. Republicans and Democrats alike panned FBI Director Kash Patel’s testimony relating to Epstein last week. “Patel either doesn’t have operational control over this or he does and is using terms of art like ‘credible evidence’ to get around it,” said a House member. Earlier this month, Republicans on the House Rules Committee rejected an effort to put the Epstein Files Transparency Act to a floor vote. And, notes Axios, House Speaker Mike Johnson has, in the past, “tucked language in party-line procedural measures to kill” past petitions, and could try to do so again. But Johnson “faced blowback when he employed the tactic” last spring, said Axios, and the House Rules Committee Chair told reporters that her panel would not block a floor vote on the petition. According to another Republican member of Congress, “The members who voted against [allowing a vote on the Epstein Files bill] got hammered back home and were pissed. They don’t want to take a ‘no’ vote again.” In response, “West Wing staffers” at the White House have been aggressively demanding and threatening the handful of Republican Congressmembers who have joined Massie in signing the discharge opinion.... Please subscribe now to support Public's independent investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1970987084233179208/amplify_video_thumb/1970986265664430080/img/RdUcozf-_pkLmHjm.jpg)