Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇺🇸🇷🇺U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham has announced a major legislative breakthrough, confirming that Congress and the White House have finalized an aggressive, veto-proof sanctions package designed to economically strangle the Russian Federation. Speaking directly from Capitol Hill, the veteran Republican senator revealed that high-level negotiations with the White House successfully...

NSTRIKE1231's profile picture

NSTRIKE

84,775 subscribers

22,307 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

‼️🇺🇸🇺🇦 The war in Ukraine could be ended in the coming months under certain conditions, – Senator Lindsey Graham. ▪️U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham stated that the White House supports a coordinated version of the bill on new sanctions against Russia. ▪️According to the senator, the agreement reached makes it possible to expect the document to be passed as law. ▪️Graham noted that the bill provides the President of the United States with the authority to impose additional tariffs and restrictions on countries that continue to purchase Russian oil and gas. ▪️In addition, the document proposes the possibility of applying restrictive measures against foreign states and companies that, according to Washington, contribute to circumventing existing sanctions against Russia.
2:04

‼️🇺🇸🇺🇦 The war in Ukraine could be ended in the coming months under certain conditions, – Senator Lindsey Graham. ▪️U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham stated that the White House supports a coordinated version of the bill on new sanctions against Russia. ▪️According to the senator, the agreement reached makes it possible to expect the document to be passed as law. ▪️Graham noted that the bill provides the President of the United States with the authority to impose additional tariffs and restrictions on countries that continue to purchase Russian oil and gas. ▪️In addition, the document proposes the possibility of applying restrictive measures against foreign states and companies that, according to Washington, contribute to circumventing existing sanctions against Russia.

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

15,974 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Lindsey Graham demands aggressive economic sanctions to dismantle Putin’s war machine, saying it’s time to hit the Russian regime where it hurts. He declares that Congress won’t wait any longer—lawmakers will now take charge and pressure Moscow into a peace agreement. Believing Putin has abandoned any pursuit of peace, Graham says the only option left is to flip the script and challenge Russia’s game plan head-on.
1:11

Lindsey Graham demands aggressive economic sanctions to dismantle Putin’s war machine, saying it’s time to hit the Russian regime where it hurts. He declares that Congress won’t wait any longer—lawmakers will now take charge and pressure Moscow into a peace agreement. Believing Putin has abandoned any pursuit of peace, Graham says the only option left is to flip the script and challenge Russia’s game plan head-on.

Shadow of Ezra

149,218 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸✖️🇷🇺 Trump Endorses New Sanctions Against Russia During a Round of Golf 📝 Senator-extremist Lindsey Graham* revealed that he received personal approval from Donald Trump to push forward a new anti-Russia bill — right on the golf course. The bill proposes 500% tariffs on goods from countries that buy oil from Russia but don’t support Ukraine — primarily targeting India and China. According to Graham, the bill already has backing from 84 senators. ⚡️The core idea of the initiative is to pressure countries continuing economic cooperation with Moscow in order to “force Putin to the negotiating table.” The bill, Graham clarified, gives the U.S. president the authority to decide whether or not to impose the tariffs. “Yes, we were playing golf with Trump, and he said, ‘It’s time to push your bill forward,’” — Graham stated. He added that a vote on the legislation is expected right after the July recess. The Washington Post has previously written about the potential consequences of this bill — including major risks for the U.S. economy itself. * Lindsey Graham is listed as a terrorist and extremist in the Russian Federation. - Ostashko
1:04

🇺🇸✖️🇷🇺 Trump Endorses New Sanctions Against Russia During a Round of Golf 📝 Senator-extremist Lindsey Graham* revealed that he received personal approval from Donald Trump to push forward a new anti-Russia bill — right on the golf course. The bill proposes 500% tariffs on goods from countries that buy oil from Russia but don’t support Ukraine — primarily targeting India and China. According to Graham, the bill already has backing from 84 senators. ⚡️The core idea of the initiative is to pressure countries continuing economic cooperation with Moscow in order to “force Putin to the negotiating table.” The bill, Graham clarified, gives the U.S. president the authority to decide whether or not to impose the tariffs. “Yes, we were playing golf with Trump, and he said, ‘It’s time to push your bill forward,’” — Graham stated. He added that a vote on the legislation is expected right after the July recess. The Washington Post has previously written about the potential consequences of this bill — including major risks for the U.S. economy itself. * Lindsey Graham is listed as a terrorist and extremist in the Russian Federation. - Ostashko

Zlatti71

25,525 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

White House: President Trump wants to personally make decisions on sanctions against Russia. U.S. President intends to take full control over the future course of sanctions policy against Russia, White House Press-Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated. "President Trump has been in very close communication with his friends in the Senate, particularly Senator Lindsey Graham, on this issue. He has always maintained he's the Commander-in-Chief and the President for a reason, and he has been deeply involved in this conflict since the beginning. And so any decisions that are made with respect to sanctions, the President wants to reserve that authority and that right to himself," she said.
0:37

White House: President Trump wants to personally make decisions on sanctions against Russia. U.S. President intends to take full control over the future course of sanctions policy against Russia, White House Press-Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated. "President Trump has been in very close communication with his friends in the Senate, particularly Senator Lindsey Graham, on this issue. He has always maintained he's the Commander-in-Chief and the President for a reason, and he has been deeply involved in this conflict since the beginning. And so any decisions that are made with respect to sanctions, the President wants to reserve that authority and that right to himself," she said.

Anton Gerashchenko

83,722 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇳🇮🇷 The White House is facing a high-stakes test that could turn the Middle East into Trump's version of the Vietnam War. According to renowned professor Robert Pape, an Iranian surface-to-air missile allegedly downing a U.S. Apache helicopter signals that a major regional confrontation is locking into place. If Tehran launches a surprise tactical offensive in the fall to completely shatter Washington's narrative, Pape warns the administration will be left completely blind-sided while markets continue to sleepwalk through the crisis. Robert A. Pape
10:42

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇳🇮🇷 The White House is facing a high-stakes test that could turn the Middle East into Trump's version of the Vietnam War. According to renowned professor Robert Pape, an Iranian surface-to-air missile allegedly downing a U.S. Apache helicopter signals that a major regional confrontation is locking into place. If Tehran launches a surprise tactical offensive in the fall to completely shatter Washington's narrative, Pape warns the administration will be left completely blind-sided while markets continue to sleepwalk through the crisis. Robert A. Pape

Mario Nawfal

66,964 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"Trump says he won't sign the major housing bill until Congress passes the SAVE Act. The CBDC ban until 2030 was included in that bill" "Remember when I told you the housing act that had the CBDC ban built into it had passed with flying colors, bipartisan, and was going to Trump's desk to be signed? Trump now says he won't sign it until Congress passes the SAVE Act" "The SAVE Act is voter registration and voter ID. So he is holding hostage a bill that was extremely important for housing, with bipartisan support on a level we've rarely seen in the House or the Senate" "The CBDC ban until 2030 was included in that. As an update, right now that is not being signed into law. We'll see what happens there"
0:46

"Trump says he won't sign the major housing bill until Congress passes the SAVE Act. The CBDC ban until 2030 was included in that bill" "Remember when I told you the housing act that had the CBDC ban built into it had passed with flying colors, bipartisan, and was going to Trump's desk to be signed? Trump now says he won't sign it until Congress passes the SAVE Act" "The SAVE Act is voter registration and voter ID. So he is holding hostage a bill that was extremely important for housing, with bipartisan support on a level we've rarely seen in the House or the Senate" "The CBDC ban until 2030 was included in that. As an update, right now that is not being signed into law. We'll see what happens there"

The Wolf Of All Streets

44,672 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Good meeting with U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham Lindsey Graham in Kyiv. This is already his 10th visit to our country, and we appreciate this support. I'm grateful to Lindsey for recognizing our warriors. The stronger Ukraine is on the battlefield, the greater the chances that diplomacy will ultimately succeed. And right now, it is important that our long-range sanctions pressure on Russia be reinforced through new sanctions steps by our partners. Lindsey briefed me on the work underway in Congress on the relevant bill. We also discussed our urgent air defense needs to protect our people. During the NATO Summit in Ankara, President Trump and I reached political agreements on licensing the production of Patriots in Ukraine. It is now crucial to implement all of this at the team level. I thank the United States, the President, and Congress for bipartisan and consistent support from both chambers.
0:37

Good meeting with U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham Lindsey Graham in Kyiv. This is already his 10th visit to our country, and we appreciate this support. I'm grateful to Lindsey for recognizing our warriors. The stronger Ukraine is on the battlefield, the greater the chances that diplomacy will ultimately succeed. And right now, it is important that our long-range sanctions pressure on Russia be reinforced through new sanctions steps by our partners. Lindsey briefed me on the work underway in Congress on the relevant bill. We also discussed our urgent air defense needs to protect our people. During the NATO Summit in Ankara, President Trump and I reached political agreements on licensing the production of Patriots in Ukraine. It is now crucial to implement all of this at the team level. I thank the United States, the President, and Congress for bipartisan and consistent support from both chambers.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

2,844,590 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

At today’s Ways and Means Committee hearing, I spoke with Treasury Secretary Bessent about my Sanctioning Russia Act—bipartisan legislation I introduced with Lindsey Graham to impose the most aggressive sanctions yet on Putin’s regime. This bill targets the banks, industries, and enablers fueling Russia’s war machine—and strikes at the heart of the Kremlin’s economy. I asked him directly: ➡️ Is Treasury ready to act if this bill becomes law? ➡️ Does OFAC have the tools in place to implement it swiftly and effectively? Secretary Bessent was clear: Yes. Treasury is ready, and OFAC has what it needs. With 84 Senators and 70 House Members already signed on, it’s time to finish the job. Congress must pass this bill. Peace through strength means action. It means using every tool at our disposal to turn economic pressure into strategic power—until Putin’s war machine is dismantled and Ukraine is free. This is more than a regional conflict. It’s a global fight for democracy, sovereignty, and the rule of law.
5:12

At today’s Ways and Means Committee hearing, I spoke with Treasury Secretary Bessent about my Sanctioning Russia Act—bipartisan legislation I introduced with Lindsey Graham to impose the most aggressive sanctions yet on Putin’s regime. This bill targets the banks, industries, and enablers fueling Russia’s war machine—and strikes at the heart of the Kremlin’s economy. I asked him directly: ➡️ Is Treasury ready to act if this bill becomes law? ➡️ Does OFAC have the tools in place to implement it swiftly and effectively? Secretary Bessent was clear: Yes. Treasury is ready, and OFAC has what it needs. With 84 Senators and 70 House Members already signed on, it’s time to finish the job. Congress must pass this bill. Peace through strength means action. It means using every tool at our disposal to turn economic pressure into strategic power—until Putin’s war machine is dismantled and Ukraine is free. This is more than a regional conflict. It’s a global fight for democracy, sovereignty, and the rule of law.

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick 🇺🇸

21,799 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

During the apartheid era (1948–1994), the United States government maintained a complex and often contradictory relationship with the South African regime. Initially, U.S. foreign policy prioritized Cold War strategy over human rights, viewing apartheid South Africa as a reliable anti-communist ally in Africa. From the Truman to the Reagan administrations, American leaders emphasized "constructive engagement," favoring quiet diplomacy over economic sanctions. This approach allowed major U.S. corporations to continue operating in South Africa, providing vital economic support to the apartheid state. Despite growing domestic and international pressure, the U.S. resisted stringent sanctions until the 1980s. Grassroots movements, student activism, and congressional lobbying eventually led to the passage of the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, which was signed into law despite President Ronald Reagan's veto. This legislation marked a significant shift in U.S. policy and imposed sweeping economic sanctions on South Africa, including bans on new investment and imports of certain goods. While the U.S. government had long avoided direct confrontation with the apartheid regime, the 1986 sanctions played a pivotal role in isolating it economically and politically. The international community increasingly condemned apartheid as a crime against humanity, and the U.S. ultimately aligned itself with this global consensus. The pressure contributed to the dismantling of apartheid and the peaceful transition to democracy in 1994.
2:10

During the apartheid era (1948–1994), the United States government maintained a complex and often contradictory relationship with the South African regime. Initially, U.S. foreign policy prioritized Cold War strategy over human rights, viewing apartheid South Africa as a reliable anti-communist ally in Africa. From the Truman to the Reagan administrations, American leaders emphasized "constructive engagement," favoring quiet diplomacy over economic sanctions. This approach allowed major U.S. corporations to continue operating in South Africa, providing vital economic support to the apartheid state. Despite growing domestic and international pressure, the U.S. resisted stringent sanctions until the 1980s. Grassroots movements, student activism, and congressional lobbying eventually led to the passage of the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, which was signed into law despite President Ronald Reagan's veto. This legislation marked a significant shift in U.S. policy and imposed sweeping economic sanctions on South Africa, including bans on new investment and imports of certain goods. While the U.S. government had long avoided direct confrontation with the apartheid regime, the 1986 sanctions played a pivotal role in isolating it economically and politically. The international community increasingly condemned apartheid as a crime against humanity, and the U.S. ultimately aligned itself with this global consensus. The pressure contributed to the dismantling of apartheid and the peaceful transition to democracy in 1994.

LambChip

27,504 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

US Senator Lindsey Graham in Kyiv: "I would expect next week that the Senate will start moving the sanctions bill. There are House members that are ready to move in the House, and you'll see congressional action. President Trump said that this next two-week period will be outcome-determinative. I see nothing about the meeting on Monday in Istanbul to give me any hope at all that Russia is interested in peace. So when this two-week period is over, I think it'll be pretty clear to everybody: Russia is playing a game at the expense of the world, not just the United States. We're going to change that game for Russia. The game that Putin's been playing is about to change. He's going to be hit and hit hard by the United States when it comes to sanctions. China, the game you're playing with Russia, is about to change. If you keep buying cheap Russian oil to fuel Putin's war machine, there will be a 500% tariff on all of your products coming into the United States," Lindsey Graham said.
1:11

US Senator Lindsey Graham in Kyiv: "I would expect next week that the Senate will start moving the sanctions bill. There are House members that are ready to move in the House, and you'll see congressional action. President Trump said that this next two-week period will be outcome-determinative. I see nothing about the meeting on Monday in Istanbul to give me any hope at all that Russia is interested in peace. So when this two-week period is over, I think it'll be pretty clear to everybody: Russia is playing a game at the expense of the world, not just the United States. We're going to change that game for Russia. The game that Putin's been playing is about to change. He's going to be hit and hit hard by the United States when it comes to sanctions. China, the game you're playing with Russia, is about to change. If you keep buying cheap Russian oil to fuel Putin's war machine, there will be a 500% tariff on all of your products coming into the United States," Lindsey Graham said.

Anton Gerashchenko

165,165 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE U.S. ALSO WANTS TO ELIMINATE THE INFLUENCE OF RUSSIA, CHINA, AND IRAN IN VENEZUELA" Former CIA Intel Analyst Larry Johnson says it’s not just about oil deals or Maduro cutting a bargain with Washington. He argues the bigger U.S. goal is to push Russia, China, and Iran out of Venezuela’s orbit, and to stop Caracas from drifting into BRICS and away from a U.S.-dollar-led system. In his view, if Venezuela moves into a different economic lane, the U.S. loses one of its main power tools: sanctions and financial pressure. "The U.S. also wants to eliminate the presence, the influence of Russia, China, and Iran. They have had good relations, cordial relations with Maduro. Maduro has been making sounds of wanting to join BRICS, and I think the U.S. definitely wants to curtail that. Because that’ll just be another important country in this hemisphere that is moving away from the U.S. dollar-controlled economy into something that the U.S. can no longer use economic sanctions and coercion to try to enforce certain behaviors on countries." Larry Johnson
0:56

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE U.S. ALSO WANTS TO ELIMINATE THE INFLUENCE OF RUSSIA, CHINA, AND IRAN IN VENEZUELA" Former CIA Intel Analyst Larry Johnson says it’s not just about oil deals or Maduro cutting a bargain with Washington. He argues the bigger U.S. goal is to push Russia, China, and Iran out of Venezuela’s orbit, and to stop Caracas from drifting into BRICS and away from a U.S.-dollar-led system. In his view, if Venezuela moves into a different economic lane, the U.S. loses one of its main power tools: sanctions and financial pressure. "The U.S. also wants to eliminate the presence, the influence of Russia, China, and Iran. They have had good relations, cordial relations with Maduro. Maduro has been making sounds of wanting to join BRICS, and I think the U.S. definitely wants to curtail that. Because that’ll just be another important country in this hemisphere that is moving away from the U.S. dollar-controlled economy into something that the U.S. can no longer use economic sanctions and coercion to try to enforce certain behaviors on countries." Larry Johnson

Mario Nawfal

27,045 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

LINDSEY GRAHAM THINKS HE IS PRESIDENT! WANTS TO DESTROY RUSSIA and put 500% TARIFFS on CHINA or anyone doing business with RUSSIA! How does this help USA citizens? It just destroys 135M Russians. HE SHOULD BE ARRESTED VIOLATION OF HATCH ACT! Lindsey Graham demands aggressive economic sanctions to dismantle Putin’s war machine, saying it’s time to hit the Russian regime where it hurts. He declares that Congress won’t wait any longer—lawmakers will now take charge and pressure Moscow into a peace agreement. Believing Putin has abandoned any pursuit of peace, Graham says the only option left is to flip the script and challenge Russia’s game plan head-on. Shadow of Ezra
1:11

LINDSEY GRAHAM THINKS HE IS PRESIDENT! WANTS TO DESTROY RUSSIA and put 500% TARIFFS on CHINA or anyone doing business with RUSSIA! How does this help USA citizens? It just destroys 135M Russians. HE SHOULD BE ARRESTED VIOLATION OF HATCH ACT! Lindsey Graham demands aggressive economic sanctions to dismantle Putin’s war machine, saying it’s time to hit the Russian regime where it hurts. He declares that Congress won’t wait any longer—lawmakers will now take charge and pressure Moscow into a peace agreement. Believing Putin has abandoned any pursuit of peace, Graham says the only option left is to flip the script and challenge Russia’s game plan head-on. Shadow of Ezra

TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺

105,310 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Most have no idea what’s really going on in the U.S., so I’ll break it down. Donald Trump is using executive orders in 2025 to exercise expansive emergency powers that were originally granted by Congress through a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. This law allows a president to declare a national emergency in response to any “unusual and extraordinary threat” that comes from outside the United States, and once that emergency is declared, the president can then control trade, freeze assets, block transactions, restrict exports, and impose tariffs all without needing Congress to approve each action individually. While Congress technically authorizes this power, once it’s granted, the president can renew it every year, and in practice these emergencies often remain in effect for decades unless Congress actively revokes them, which it rarely does. According to Jim Rickards, and as the legal record confirms, the authority starts with Congress but becomes essentially a long leash for the executive branch. What we’re seeing now is Trump using these powers not just for national security or sanctions, but to reshape economic and financial policy by executive order. He’s imposing tariffs on countries like Canada, Mexico, China, and Venezuela by framing them as threats to U.S. energy and economic security. This allows him to bypass Congress on tariff policy, even though trade powers are constitutionally supposed to reside with the legislature. In another example, Trump’s January 23, 2025 executive order directly bans CBDCs in the U.S., stating they pose a threat to individual privacy and the financial sovereignty of the country. That same order encourages the use of USD backed stablecoins, giving the Treasury and private sector blockchain issuers the green light to develop digital dollar alternatives. Although this isn’t framed as an IEEPA action, it follows the same logic. Define a problem as an emergency, then use executive power to impose a solution. Trump is also using these powers to regulate technology and supply chains, placing restrictions on exports of sensitive tools like semiconductors and artificial intelligence chips. He’s invoking national security again to justify these moves. We’re seeing similar actions around rare earth minerals, energy infrastructure, and anything that touches critical systems, including digital platforms and cloud computing. All of this ties into digital adoption because it clears the legal pathway for the executive branch to push the United States toward a new digital financial infrastructure without needing to wait for Congress. When Trump bans CBDCs and promotes dollar-backed stablecoins, he’s not just taking a stance on currency he’s choosing which version of the digital financial future the U.S. should adopt. By rejecting government issued programmable money and favoring blockchain based, private sector innovation tied to the U.S. dollar, he’s reshaping how digital money will function, who controls it, and how it connects to the broader trade and regulatory environment. This approach fits perfectly into the broader timeline I’ve been building. As other countries move forward with multi-CBDC’s (mCBDCs) and crossborder payment systems, the U.S. is carving out a distinct path. One that uses emergency powers to protect national sovereignty while fostering digital adoption through stablecoins, smart contract platforms, and alternative rails like RippleNet and Stellar. Executive orders are becoming the backbone of this shift, sidestepping the delays of legislative negotiation and allowing the White House to set the pace for how digital systems, identity, money, and compliance infrastructure are rolled out. RLUSD right in plain right from the treasury. Those with eyes to see will see it. 👀🫱🏾‍🫲🏻 Emergency declaration:
1:58

Most have no idea what’s really going on in the U.S., so I’ll break it down. Donald Trump is using executive orders in 2025 to exercise expansive emergency powers that were originally granted by Congress through a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. This law allows a president to declare a national emergency in response to any “unusual and extraordinary threat” that comes from outside the United States, and once that emergency is declared, the president can then control trade, freeze assets, block transactions, restrict exports, and impose tariffs all without needing Congress to approve each action individually. While Congress technically authorizes this power, once it’s granted, the president can renew it every year, and in practice these emergencies often remain in effect for decades unless Congress actively revokes them, which it rarely does. According to Jim Rickards, and as the legal record confirms, the authority starts with Congress but becomes essentially a long leash for the executive branch. What we’re seeing now is Trump using these powers not just for national security or sanctions, but to reshape economic and financial policy by executive order. He’s imposing tariffs on countries like Canada, Mexico, China, and Venezuela by framing them as threats to U.S. energy and economic security. This allows him to bypass Congress on tariff policy, even though trade powers are constitutionally supposed to reside with the legislature. In another example, Trump’s January 23, 2025 executive order directly bans CBDCs in the U.S., stating they pose a threat to individual privacy and the financial sovereignty of the country. That same order encourages the use of USD backed stablecoins, giving the Treasury and private sector blockchain issuers the green light to develop digital dollar alternatives. Although this isn’t framed as an IEEPA action, it follows the same logic. Define a problem as an emergency, then use executive power to impose a solution. Trump is also using these powers to regulate technology and supply chains, placing restrictions on exports of sensitive tools like semiconductors and artificial intelligence chips. He’s invoking national security again to justify these moves. We’re seeing similar actions around rare earth minerals, energy infrastructure, and anything that touches critical systems, including digital platforms and cloud computing. All of this ties into digital adoption because it clears the legal pathway for the executive branch to push the United States toward a new digital financial infrastructure without needing to wait for Congress. When Trump bans CBDCs and promotes dollar-backed stablecoins, he’s not just taking a stance on currency he’s choosing which version of the digital financial future the U.S. should adopt. By rejecting government issued programmable money and favoring blockchain based, private sector innovation tied to the U.S. dollar, he’s reshaping how digital money will function, who controls it, and how it connects to the broader trade and regulatory environment. This approach fits perfectly into the broader timeline I’ve been building. As other countries move forward with multi-CBDC’s (mCBDCs) and crossborder payment systems, the U.S. is carving out a distinct path. One that uses emergency powers to protect national sovereignty while fostering digital adoption through stablecoins, smart contract platforms, and alternative rails like RippleNet and Stellar. Executive orders are becoming the backbone of this shift, sidestepping the delays of legislative negotiation and allowing the White House to set the pace for how digital systems, identity, money, and compliance infrastructure are rolled out. RLUSD right in plain right from the treasury. Those with eyes to see will see it. 👀🫱🏾‍🫲🏻 Emergency declaration:

Mr. Man

58,764 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In 2014, Senator Chris Murphy bragged about the United States successfully overthrowing Ukraine's government: "I think it was our role, including sanctions and threats of sanctions, that forced, in part, Yanukovych from office." "We have not sat on the sidelines. We have been very much involved. Members of the Senate have been there. Members of the State Department have been on the Square." "The Obama administration passed sanctions. The Senate was prepared to pass its own set of sanctions, and as I've said, I think that the clear position of the United States has, in part, been what has helped lead to this change in regime." "If, ultimately, this is a peaceful transition to a new government in Ukraine, it will be the U.S. on the streets of Ukraine who will be seen as a great friend in helping make that transition happen." "There is a U.S. interest here. We are in the middle of negotiating a new trade agreement with Europe. To my state, it's enormously important. We do 40% of our trade in Connecticut with Europe." "If Ukraine is part of the EU and thus is part of this new trade agreement with the United States, that could result in billions of dollars in new economic opportunities for the U.S." "So, we do have an economic interest in Ukraine being a part of the EU, and we shouldn't be shy about making that interest clear."
5:04

In 2014, Senator Chris Murphy bragged about the United States successfully overthrowing Ukraine's government: "I think it was our role, including sanctions and threats of sanctions, that forced, in part, Yanukovych from office." "We have not sat on the sidelines. We have been very much involved. Members of the Senate have been there. Members of the State Department have been on the Square." "The Obama administration passed sanctions. The Senate was prepared to pass its own set of sanctions, and as I've said, I think that the clear position of the United States has, in part, been what has helped lead to this change in regime." "If, ultimately, this is a peaceful transition to a new government in Ukraine, it will be the U.S. on the streets of Ukraine who will be seen as a great friend in helping make that transition happen." "There is a U.S. interest here. We are in the middle of negotiating a new trade agreement with Europe. To my state, it's enormously important. We do 40% of our trade in Connecticut with Europe." "If Ukraine is part of the EU and thus is part of this new trade agreement with the United States, that could result in billions of dollars in new economic opportunities for the U.S." "So, we do have an economic interest in Ukraine being a part of the EU, and we shouldn't be shy about making that interest clear."

KanekoaTheGreat

18,645,674 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

❗️❗️❗️🇺🇦🇷🇺Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has made a historic geopolitical announcement, officially establishing a highly specialized Long-Range Strike Command within the Armed Forces of Ukraine to systematically orchestrate and execute devastating precision attacks deep inside Russian territory. The newly formed functional structure is engineered to consolidate and focus 100% of Ukraine's long-range kinetic and technical resources into a unified offensive force. Zelensky emphasized that this command will operate with a mandate of "global influence" over the aggressor state, aggressively systematically stripping the Kremlin of its industrial and military capabilities day by day. In a powerful rhetorical message, Zelensky noted that Ukraine’s relentless deep-strike campaign has already broken through into multiple Russian oblasts and Russian-occupied hubs. He firmly underscored that the paralyzing fuel and energy crisis currently gripping the Russian Federation is a completely justified, direct consequence of Putin’s refusal to end the war, proving that Ukraine’s asymmetric pressure has created an inescapable reality that even those within the Russian dictator's inner circle are beginning to realize has no alternative but a diplomatic exit.
0:23

❗️❗️❗️🇺🇦🇷🇺Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has made a historic geopolitical announcement, officially establishing a highly specialized Long-Range Strike Command within the Armed Forces of Ukraine to systematically orchestrate and execute devastating precision attacks deep inside Russian territory. The newly formed functional structure is engineered to consolidate and focus 100% of Ukraine's long-range kinetic and technical resources into a unified offensive force. Zelensky emphasized that this command will operate with a mandate of "global influence" over the aggressor state, aggressively systematically stripping the Kremlin of its industrial and military capabilities day by day. In a powerful rhetorical message, Zelensky noted that Ukraine’s relentless deep-strike campaign has already broken through into multiple Russian oblasts and Russian-occupied hubs. He firmly underscored that the paralyzing fuel and energy crisis currently gripping the Russian Federation is a completely justified, direct consequence of Putin’s refusal to end the war, proving that Ukraine’s asymmetric pressure has created an inescapable reality that even those within the Russian dictator's inner circle are beginning to realize has no alternative but a diplomatic exit.

NSTRIKE

36,114 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

“Trump’s team wants to scrap it [Putin’s war against Ukraine ] from the agenda.” Lavrov. Lavrov is confirming what many have long feared: that the Trump presidency would serve Russian interests. “This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team, that does not reflect the philosophy of the incumbent US administration. I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda so as to eliminate obstacles for normal economic, technological and other relations. This will not be easy because the United States has a peculiar approach towards addressing and resolving economic issues.” Lavrov said. "This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team..." This statement is a complete inversion of reality. A blatant and self-serving lie, repeated daily by Trump. Russia feels it can openly lie about the origins of the war because the U.S. President is not a reliable bulwark against Russian disinformation. Putin’s war is not "artificial" or a creation of the Biden administration. It is a full-scale, unprovoked invasion, killing thousands of Ukranians. Russia's actions are driven by its own imperial ambitions and its long-standing desire to subjugate Ukraine and undermine its sovereignty. Lavrov is essentially saying "the war is artificial because we want it to be over on our terms, and now we have a fool who agrees.” The war is a reflection of putin’s “philosophy”, not Biden's. This is the most revealing and chilling part of the statement. Lavrov is essentially giving a back-handed compliment to Trump, confirming that the "philosophy" of the current U.S. administration is to abandon Ukraine. Lavrov is celebrating the fact that the U.S. is no longer committed to the principles of a sovereign, independent Ukraine and is instead more aligned with Russia's view on Ukraine and Europe. Trump's "philosophy" is not about peace, but about appeasement and capitulation, driven by a personal disdain for previous U.S. policy and a fascination with authoritarian strongmen like putin, Xi and Kim Jong Un. "I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda..." This is a direct admission of collusion. Lavrov openly stating that Russia and the U.S. are working together to end the war, but on Russia’s terms. "Scrapping it from the agenda" is a euphemism for forcing Ukraine to surrender territory, a position that would be an outrageous betrayal by Trump. Trump is not seeking a just peace, but rather a quick resolution that allows Russia to claim victory. It confirms that the primary obstacle to Russia's goals has been removed, and the path to a Russian-dictated peace is now open. It is not just propaganda; it is an open admission of a new strategic reality. It confirms that Russia has successfully exploited U.S. political divisions to find a partner in the White House, and that it now feels confident enough to publicly celebrate the unraveling of the West's collective front against Russian aggression.
0:31

“Trump’s team wants to scrap it [Putin’s war against Ukraine ] from the agenda.” Lavrov. Lavrov is confirming what many have long feared: that the Trump presidency would serve Russian interests. “This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team, that does not reflect the philosophy of the incumbent US administration. I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda so as to eliminate obstacles for normal economic, technological and other relations. This will not be easy because the United States has a peculiar approach towards addressing and resolving economic issues.” Lavrov said. "This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team..." This statement is a complete inversion of reality. A blatant and self-serving lie, repeated daily by Trump. Russia feels it can openly lie about the origins of the war because the U.S. President is not a reliable bulwark against Russian disinformation. Putin’s war is not "artificial" or a creation of the Biden administration. It is a full-scale, unprovoked invasion, killing thousands of Ukranians. Russia's actions are driven by its own imperial ambitions and its long-standing desire to subjugate Ukraine and undermine its sovereignty. Lavrov is essentially saying "the war is artificial because we want it to be over on our terms, and now we have a fool who agrees.” The war is a reflection of putin’s “philosophy”, not Biden's. This is the most revealing and chilling part of the statement. Lavrov is essentially giving a back-handed compliment to Trump, confirming that the "philosophy" of the current U.S. administration is to abandon Ukraine. Lavrov is celebrating the fact that the U.S. is no longer committed to the principles of a sovereign, independent Ukraine and is instead more aligned with Russia's view on Ukraine and Europe. Trump's "philosophy" is not about peace, but about appeasement and capitulation, driven by a personal disdain for previous U.S. policy and a fascination with authoritarian strongmen like putin, Xi and Kim Jong Un. "I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda..." This is a direct admission of collusion. Lavrov openly stating that Russia and the U.S. are working together to end the war, but on Russia’s terms. "Scrapping it from the agenda" is a euphemism for forcing Ukraine to surrender territory, a position that would be an outrageous betrayal by Trump. Trump is not seeking a just peace, but rather a quick resolution that allows Russia to claim victory. It confirms that the primary obstacle to Russia's goals has been removed, and the path to a Russian-dictated peace is now open. It is not just propaganda; it is an open admission of a new strategic reality. It confirms that Russia has successfully exploited U.S. political divisions to find a partner in the White House, and that it now feels confident enough to publicly celebrate the unraveling of the West's collective front against Russian aggression.

Yasmina

228,695 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Remember what The Federal Reserve Act of 1913(Centralized Banking) took from us as American Citizens. The ability to have Economic veto power from bonds a direct will of the people without bureaucracy oversight. Now the government get to subvert the will of the people through central banking cartels, like the federal reserve. That's a misnomer, they're no more federal than the federal express. The concept of "economic veto power" from bonds, as discussed in the context of pre-1913 U.S. financial systems, refers to the ability of citizens to influence government spending decisions through their participation in the bond market. "So in 1913, a convenient new arrangement was made. The Federal Reserve Act created an unlimited credit line for the federal United States government to borrow directly from the Federal Reserve Bank and obligated the American people to pay it back, completely bypassing our veto power. They no longer had to come to us directly to ask permission to fund something. They went directly to the bank. Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power over the spending policies of the federal government because, in order for the federal government to borrow any money, it had to go to the people. There was no central bank it could go to. It had to sell bonds. If you didn't want to go to war, you didn't buy the bonds. If you didn't want the pork project that the government had in mind, you didn't buy the bonds. It was a very simple system, a republican system whereby you had veto power, economic veto power, and it worked very well until 1913. That's how the government managed to stay small because it didn't have an unlimited credit line to go on a shopping spree for 80 years and make you pay for it."
1:09

Remember what The Federal Reserve Act of 1913(Centralized Banking) took from us as American Citizens. The ability to have Economic veto power from bonds a direct will of the people without bureaucracy oversight. Now the government get to subvert the will of the people through central banking cartels, like the federal reserve. That's a misnomer, they're no more federal than the federal express. The concept of "economic veto power" from bonds, as discussed in the context of pre-1913 U.S. financial systems, refers to the ability of citizens to influence government spending decisions through their participation in the bond market. "So in 1913, a convenient new arrangement was made. The Federal Reserve Act created an unlimited credit line for the federal United States government to borrow directly from the Federal Reserve Bank and obligated the American people to pay it back, completely bypassing our veto power. They no longer had to come to us directly to ask permission to fund something. They went directly to the bank. Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power over the spending policies of the federal government because, in order for the federal government to borrow any money, it had to go to the people. There was no central bank it could go to. It had to sell bonds. If you didn't want to go to war, you didn't buy the bonds. If you didn't want the pork project that the government had in mind, you didn't buy the bonds. It was a very simple system, a republican system whereby you had veto power, economic veto power, and it worked very well until 1913. That's how the government managed to stay small because it didn't have an unlimited credit line to go on a shopping spree for 80 years and make you pay for it."

Ꭷʀɨօռ

16,599 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

👻Remember the “Spirit of Anchorage” that Putin and Lavrov spoke about so warmly? Well, it seems to have evaporated in Washington The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a new Ukraine aid package and fresh sanctions on Russia. The bill passed 226–204, with 18 Republicans joining Democrats — meaning part of Trump’s own party broke ranks with its leadership. The package includes more than $1 billion in security assistance for Ukraine, up to $8 billion in defense loans, and tariffs of up to 500% on Russian goods. In practical terms, selling Russian products in the U.S. would become nearly pointless. But don’t pop the champagne just yet. The bill still has to pass the Senate, which is controlled by Republicans. As the Associated Press notes, without Trump’s personal approval, the legislation is likely to stall there. Even the bill’s authors barely hide the fact that the vote was meant as a signal: support for Ukraine in Congress is still very much alive. Whether that signal reaches its intended recipient is now up to one notoriously unpredictable man in the White House.
1:26

👻Remember the “Spirit of Anchorage” that Putin and Lavrov spoke about so warmly? Well, it seems to have evaporated in Washington The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a new Ukraine aid package and fresh sanctions on Russia. The bill passed 226–204, with 18 Republicans joining Democrats — meaning part of Trump’s own party broke ranks with its leadership. The package includes more than $1 billion in security assistance for Ukraine, up to $8 billion in defense loans, and tariffs of up to 500% on Russian goods. In practical terms, selling Russian products in the U.S. would become nearly pointless. But don’t pop the champagne just yet. The bill still has to pass the Senate, which is controlled by Republicans. As the Associated Press notes, without Trump’s personal approval, the legislation is likely to stall there. Even the bill’s authors barely hide the fact that the vote was meant as a signal: support for Ukraine in Congress is still very much alive. Whether that signal reaches its intended recipient is now up to one notoriously unpredictable man in the White House.

NEXTA

46,145 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: 🚨 Russian state media called for Senator Lindsey Graham’s assassination in 2023 after his meeting with Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський. Now, 3 years later, just one day after meeting with Zelensky in Ukraine, Senator Graham is dead. RT, Russian state media that is controlled by the Kremlin and Putin is mocking me for suggesting Russia or Iran may have poisoned Senator Lindsey Graham, who just returned from Ukraine yesterday and is now dead. 5 days ago at Khamenei’s funeral in Iran, the IRGC called for Senator Graham to be assassinated. Russia sent a delegation to Khamenei’s funeral. Here’s a video of Margarita Simonyan, the editor-in-chief of RT, saying she wants to send a Russian assassination squad to take out Senator Lindsey Graham. RT is nothing more than Russian propaganda. While in Ukraine, Lindsey Graham called for more support for Ukraine to combat Russian ballistic missiles, and he said the White House supported his proposal for increased sanctions on Russia. Now, one day later, Senator Graham has died very unexpectedly. There needs to be an investigation into his death and a toxicology report and autopsy. I think Senator Graham may have been poisoned during his travels abroad. The Russians love gaslighting people to pretend like they never said the things they are on the record saying. Russia doesn’t want their war to end, and neither does Iran. U.S. Secret Service Marco Rubio Watch the video below 👇🏻
3:20

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: 🚨 Russian state media called for Senator Lindsey Graham’s assassination in 2023 after his meeting with Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський. Now, 3 years later, just one day after meeting with Zelensky in Ukraine, Senator Graham is dead. RT, Russian state media that is controlled by the Kremlin and Putin is mocking me for suggesting Russia or Iran may have poisoned Senator Lindsey Graham, who just returned from Ukraine yesterday and is now dead. 5 days ago at Khamenei’s funeral in Iran, the IRGC called for Senator Graham to be assassinated. Russia sent a delegation to Khamenei’s funeral. Here’s a video of Margarita Simonyan, the editor-in-chief of RT, saying she wants to send a Russian assassination squad to take out Senator Lindsey Graham. RT is nothing more than Russian propaganda. While in Ukraine, Lindsey Graham called for more support for Ukraine to combat Russian ballistic missiles, and he said the White House supported his proposal for increased sanctions on Russia. Now, one day later, Senator Graham has died very unexpectedly. There needs to be an investigation into his death and a toxicology report and autopsy. I think Senator Graham may have been poisoned during his travels abroad. The Russians love gaslighting people to pretend like they never said the things they are on the record saying. Russia doesn’t want their war to end, and neither does Iran. U.S. Secret Service Marco Rubio Watch the video below 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

538,756 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

'Iran proved it through action: until the last minute, before the start of hostilities, until the moment of the first strike on the country, Tehran remained open to the continuation of mediations.’ -Kremlin🇷🇺 Spokseperson Dmitri Peskov Oman’s Foreign Minister put it on the record before the war started; that there had been a breakthrough in negotiations and Iran was willing to give unprecedented concessions. This was always a war of choice unleashed by Donald Trump, which has led to unprecedented destruction in the region. It was also a choice to allow the Israelis to dictate the choice between war and peace. One phone call from an American President to Israel with the threat of cutting off support could have stopped this disaster from taking place.
0:39

'Iran proved it through action: until the last minute, before the start of hostilities, until the moment of the first strike on the country, Tehran remained open to the continuation of mediations.’ -Kremlin🇷🇺 Spokseperson Dmitri Peskov Oman’s Foreign Minister put it on the record before the war started; that there had been a breakthrough in negotiations and Iran was willing to give unprecedented concessions. This was always a war of choice unleashed by Donald Trump, which has led to unprecedented destruction in the region. It was also a choice to allow the Israelis to dictate the choice between war and peace. One phone call from an American President to Israel with the threat of cutting off support could have stopped this disaster from taking place.

Afshin Rattansi

23,339 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten