Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Users of most AI coding products are still stuck in the vibe-coding loop: Prompt → Test → Debug → Adjust → Fix Errors → Repeat Bubble Code users take a different path. State the product goal. If the result needs improvement, submit a Bubble Up. Then Bubble Engine takes... show more

DAPPOS

162,970 subscribers

25,349 просмотров • 10 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

No setup. No coding workflow. Users state the goal. Bubble Code runs the right Coding SOP. Just switch to Code mode, upload an image, and tell Bubble Code what business you want to build. Enjoy software created from one voice prompt. 🫧

No setup. No coding workflow. Users state the goal. Bubble Code runs the right Coding SOP. Just switch to Code mode, upload an image, and tell Bubble Code what business you want to build. Enjoy software created from one voice prompt. 🫧

DAPPOS

26,291 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Users state the goal: build a site that tracks Iran-related Polymarket markets and breaking movements. Bubble Code routes it to a Polymarket Agent SOP, connects live market data, sets monitoring keywords, and builds Iran Pulse: a working dashboard for probabilities, volume, liquidity, abnormal changes, and breaking signals. This is not a normal AI demo or static page. It is a ready-to-use market-monitoring product that can refresh, run, deploy, and be used directly.

Users state the goal: build a site that tracks Iran-related Polymarket markets and breaking movements. Bubble Code routes it to a Polymarket Agent SOP, connects live market data, sets monitoring keywords, and builds Iran Pulse: a working dashboard for probabilities, volume, liquidity, abnormal changes, and breaking signals. This is not a normal AI demo or static page. It is a ready-to-use market-monitoring product that can refresh, run, deploy, and be used directly.

DAPPOS

120,611 просмотров • 14 дней назад

UltraCode is running over 100 Opus 4.8 agents right now. This is the future of software development. Not 5 agents. Not 10. Over 100 working simultaneously across the entire BridgeMind ecosystem. This is what vibe coding looks like at scale. One person orchestrating a swarm of AI agents building, debugging, and shipping in parallel. We are so early.

UltraCode is running over 100 Opus 4.8 agents right now. This is the future of software development. Not 5 agents. Not 10. Over 100 working simultaneously across the entire BridgeMind ecosystem. This is what vibe coding looks like at scale. One person orchestrating a swarm of AI agents building, debugging, and shipping in parallel. We are so early.

BridgeMind

108,267 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

DAPPOS is bringing Onchain OS Skills from X Layer OKX Wallet into the xBubble ecosystem, making OKX Wallet’s agent-ready wallet, trading, market data, and agentic payments protocol capabilities accessible across xBubble agents. Built on top of Onchain OS Skills, xBubble’s crypto-task SOPs help turn fragmented on-chain flows into a more seamless chat-native experience inside the xBubble app across mobile, desktop, and web. Users can monitor markets, prepare trades, manage wallet activity, and coordinate payment flows through a single conversation. Bubble Engine will continue to use Onchain OS Skills as the baseline for every future SOP iteration and upgrade. With Onchain OS Skills, DAPPOS is making agentic on-chain tasks more conversational, practical, and accessible.

DAPPOS is bringing Onchain OS Skills from X Layer OKX Wallet into the xBubble ecosystem, making OKX Wallet’s agent-ready wallet, trading, market data, and agentic payments protocol capabilities accessible across xBubble agents. Built on top of Onchain OS Skills, xBubble’s crypto-task SOPs help turn fragmented on-chain flows into a more seamless chat-native experience inside the xBubble app across mobile, desktop, and web. Users can monitor markets, prepare trades, manage wallet activity, and coordinate payment flows through a single conversation. Bubble Engine will continue to use Onchain OS Skills as the baseline for every future SOP iteration and upgrade. With Onchain OS Skills, DAPPOS is making agentic on-chain tasks more conversational, practical, and accessible.

DAPPOS

14,289 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Simplicity is at the heart of great software. This is one of the reasons why Claude Code has been sticky for me. As a builder, I love planning and brainstorming, and this is now a key focus of Claude Code. I use Shift + Tab a lot to cycle between brainstorming, planning, and execution. This functionality provides the appropriate interface for me to either be very involved or less involved as I please. This works particularly well when building out new and complex features or entire new projects. This saves a huge amount of time. It allows me to tune Claude Code to execute and build more effectively. It also builds a loop of trust, and I often (surprisingly) find Claude Code asking for clarifications when it's confused. Coding agents don't normally do that. I have shared before on the power of brainstorming with AI for longer times. Try it and you will not be disappointed. Vibe coding is fun, but pair it with intentional development cycles, and you watch how far you can take a project with coding agents today.

Simplicity is at the heart of great software. This is one of the reasons why Claude Code has been sticky for me. As a builder, I love planning and brainstorming, and this is now a key focus of Claude Code. I use Shift + Tab a lot to cycle between brainstorming, planning, and execution. This functionality provides the appropriate interface for me to either be very involved or less involved as I please. This works particularly well when building out new and complex features or entire new projects. This saves a huge amount of time. It allows me to tune Claude Code to execute and build more effectively. It also builds a loop of trust, and I often (surprisingly) find Claude Code asking for clarifications when it's confused. Coding agents don't normally do that. I have shared before on the power of brainstorming with AI for longer times. Try it and you will not be disappointed. Vibe coding is fun, but pair it with intentional development cycles, and you watch how far you can take a project with coding agents today.

elvis

81,765 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Building is only the beginning. Managing what you build matters too. With xBubble, every AI website created through Bubble Code is managed in one project workspace. View all deployments, track running or paused status, pause, resume, restart, or decommission projects, and jump back into chat anytime to refine your website through conversation. From creation to deployment to continuous iteration, xBubble gives users a complete lifecycle workspace for AI products.

Building is only the beginning. Managing what you build matters too. With xBubble, every AI website created through Bubble Code is managed in one project workspace. View all deployments, track running or paused status, pause, resume, restart, or decommission projects, and jump back into chat anytime to refine your website through conversation. From creation to deployment to continuous iteration, xBubble gives users a complete lifecycle workspace for AI products.

DAPPOS

29,788 просмотров • 8 дней назад

THIS STUDENT WAS VIBE CODING AN APP, THEN GOT A $55,444.78 BILL FROM GOOGLE CLOUD All because they accidentally pushed their Gemini API key to GitHub They thought the repository was private It was just a small side project, and they still had $220 in free credits left By the time they checked their email, it was already too late This video shows exactly how things like this happen and why more and more developers are running into the same problem: > One commit turned into a $55k nightmare > API keys were exposed in frontend code and even inside app binaries > People hardcoded secrets into scripts and ended up with hundreds of dollars in charges within hours > One OpenAI key was abused nearly a million times before anyone noticed Never hardcode API keys Never commit them to GitHub, even if the repository is private Never expose them in your frontend Always use environment variables and set up spending alerts Even in the era of vibe coding, security still matters Knowing a few basic best practices can save you from some very expensive mistakes If you’re a vibe coder, make sure to read the article I attached, you’ll find plenty of practical tips that could save you a lot of trouble Save this post so you don’t lose it

THIS STUDENT WAS VIBE CODING AN APP, THEN GOT A $55,444.78 BILL FROM GOOGLE CLOUD All because they accidentally pushed their Gemini API key to GitHub They thought the repository was private It was just a small side project, and they still had $220 in free credits left By the time they checked their email, it was already too late This video shows exactly how things like this happen and why more and more developers are running into the same problem: > One commit turned into a $55k nightmare > API keys were exposed in frontend code and even inside app binaries > People hardcoded secrets into scripts and ended up with hundreds of dollars in charges within hours > One OpenAI key was abused nearly a million times before anyone noticed Never hardcode API keys Never commit them to GitHub, even if the repository is private Never expose them in your frontend Always use environment variables and set up spending alerts Even in the era of vibe coding, security still matters Knowing a few basic best practices can save you from some very expensive mistakes If you’re a vibe coder, make sure to read the article I attached, you’ll find plenty of practical tips that could save you a lot of trouble Save this post so you don’t lose it

Bonsai 🌳

110,437 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

India should host the biggest vibe coding conference the world has seen 🚀 Everything about Vibe coding(talks, panels, AI product building, hackathon, including the biggest names in the world) come here for an ultimate showdown(think 10k+ people in a Vibecoding conference) 🔥 And I have a plan Why? Because the number of learners, founders and professionals who are building via vibe coding in India and powering the global platforms is testament to the fact that if it should happen anywhere, it is here For the last 4+ years, I have enabled 3000+ people to build and continue to do so in a new avatar(announcement soon) and I believe if the entire ecosystem is willing to come together we can create a real spectacle We have the skills, the access and the experience to pull this off. The only thing it needs is for everyone seeing this to reach out and join hands(partners, sponsors & more) to make this as big as possible I am so hyped about it that the website is set, the name is set(Vibecon) and we can make an incredible run to make it happen. Reply to this post if you think we should do this, if we have >500 responses we will get to work 🥳 Reach out if you have ideas to partner to make the biggest Vibecoding conference a reality ♥️

Prashant Sharma

11,003 просмотров • 1 год назад

there are four types of agent loops. most people only know one. loop engineering is a choice between four structures, each handing off one more job than the last. every one answers two questions: what starts a run, and what ends it. hand-run, you answer both yourself, every time. 1) turn-based → you prompt, it acts, you review, you prompt again. both jobs stay with you. use when requirements are still forming. 2) goal-based → "/goal hit Lighthouse 90, stop after 5 tries." an evaluator checks, a no sends it back. use when the outcome is measurable but the path isn't. 3) time-based → a clock fires, it runs "check the PR, fix CI," then waits. /loop local, /schedule survives a closed laptop. use for recurring work. 4) proactive → no human present. it watches a channel, spawns triage, fix, and a reviewer, closes the task itself. use for standing duties you can't predict. not which one is most advanced. whether your task is exploratory, measurable, recurring, or standing. the more you hand off, the less you babysit. full breakdown in the article below.

there are four types of agent loops. most people only know one. loop engineering is a choice between four structures, each handing off one more job than the last. every one answers two questions: what starts a run, and what ends it. hand-run, you answer both yourself, every time. 1) turn-based → you prompt, it acts, you review, you prompt again. both jobs stay with you. use when requirements are still forming. 2) goal-based → "/goal hit Lighthouse 90, stop after 5 tries." an evaluator checks, a no sends it back. use when the outcome is measurable but the path isn't. 3) time-based → a clock fires, it runs "check the PR, fix CI," then waits. /loop local, /schedule survives a closed laptop. use for recurring work. 4) proactive → no human present. it watches a channel, spawns triage, fix, and a reviewer, closes the task itself. use for standing duties you can't predict. not which one is most advanced. whether your task is exploratory, measurable, recurring, or standing. the more you hand off, the less you babysit. full breakdown in the article below.

Hanako

408,328 просмотров • 1 день назад

Fable 5 comes back！It can now build playable game prototypes. I think it is actually a signal for where AI coding is going. Making a game is not just “write some code.” Even a small browser game needs: game loop；character movement；collision logic；scoring system；UI states；physics tuning；visual feedback；bug fixing；playtesting This is why game prototyping is a great test for AI models. A model cannot fake it with a pretty answer. Either the game runs, or it does not. What impressed me about Fable 5 is that it is useful for the messy middle: turning an idea into mechanics, turning mechanics into code, debugging broken interactions, and iterating until the prototype feels playable. But here is the practical part: I would not use the strongest model for every step. For game building, I would split the workflow: 1. Fable 5 for game design + architecture 2. a fast coding model for routine implementation 3. a vision-capable model for screenshot/UI feedback 4. a cheaper model for docs, test cases, and small fixes 5. fallback when latency, cost, or output quality becomes a problem That is the real AI coding stack. Not “one magic model does everything.” More like: the right model, for the right task, at the right cost, with fallback when things break. This is why I’ve been looking at ZenMux ZenMux. ZenMux gives developers one gateway to access multiple leading AI models, with OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Vertex compatible APIs, cost tracking, quality benchmarks, auto-routing, and compensation when output quality, latency, or throughput falls short. If AI can now make games, the next question is not just “which model is strongest?” It is:how do we manage the whole model workflow Fable 5 shows the creative ceiling. ZenMux is closer to the infrastructure layer you need when AI coding becomes a real production habit.

Fable 5 comes back！It can now build playable game prototypes. I think it is actually a signal for where AI coding is going. Making a game is not just “write some code.” Even a small browser game needs: game loop；character movement；collision logic；scoring system；UI states；physics tuning；visual feedback；bug fixing；playtesting This is why game prototyping is a great test for AI models. A model cannot fake it with a pretty answer. Either the game runs, or it does not. What impressed me about Fable 5 is that it is useful for the messy middle: turning an idea into mechanics, turning mechanics into code, debugging broken interactions, and iterating until the prototype feels playable. But here is the practical part: I would not use the strongest model for every step. For game building, I would split the workflow: 1. Fable 5 for game design + architecture 2. a fast coding model for routine implementation 3. a vision-capable model for screenshot/UI feedback 4. a cheaper model for docs, test cases, and small fixes 5. fallback when latency, cost, or output quality becomes a problem That is the real AI coding stack. Not “one magic model does everything.” More like: the right model, for the right task, at the right cost, with fallback when things break. This is why I’ve been looking at ZenMux ZenMux. ZenMux gives developers one gateway to access multiple leading AI models, with OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Vertex compatible APIs, cost tracking, quality benchmarks, auto-routing, and compensation when output quality, latency, or throughput falls short. If AI can now make games, the next question is not just “which model is strongest?” It is:how do we manage the whole model workflow Fable 5 shows the creative ceiling. ZenMux is closer to the infrastructure layer you need when AI coding becomes a real production habit.

Rachel🥥

57,766 просмотров • 15 дней назад

At Uber a big problem for design teams and engineering teams was design source of truth. No one knew what the app truly looked like, so weekly a bunch of designers would get into a meeting room and check that the engineers correctly implemented the figma designs that they made Now with coding agents throughput of changes has increased an order of magnitude and it has become impossible to manually keep up. Here we used the Revyl CLI to create a flow of every state in the Uber design, by navigating our mobile use agent on an cloud iOS simulator. This is something that would have taken a team of designers tens of hours to recreate manually; All done in less than an hour asynchronously with a simple prompt. Enable your team to know what your users are actually seeing and empower coding agents to give your users a delightful experience without any blindspots Get started with our new free trial and create a map for your own app 🗺️

At Uber a big problem for design teams and engineering teams was design source of truth. No one knew what the app truly looked like, so weekly a bunch of designers would get into a meeting room and check that the engineers correctly implemented the figma designs that they made Now with coding agents throughput of changes has increased an order of magnitude and it has become impossible to manually keep up. Here we used the Revyl CLI to create a flow of every state in the Uber design, by navigating our mobile use agent on an cloud iOS simulator. This is something that would have taken a team of designers tens of hours to recreate manually; All done in less than an hour asynchronously with a simple prompt. Enable your team to know what your users are actually seeing and empower coding agents to give your users a delightful experience without any blindspots Get started with our new free trial and create a map for your own app 🗺️

Anam Hira

96,160 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

do you understand what Anthropic just admitted? their engineers haven’t written most of their own code since early 2026. 80% of the code merged into Anthropic’s codebase last month was written by Claude. let that sink in. the company building the most powerful AI in the world is already being built by that AI. and the numbers keep getting wilder: → engineers are shipping 8x more code than in 2024. not because they’re working harder. because Claude is doing most of it. → Claude’s success rate on open-ended coding problems hit 76% in May 2026. up 50 points in just 6 months. → one Anthropic employee said “it’s been 5 months since I last wrote any code myself.” → Claude Mythos Preview achieved 52x speedup on research optimization. a skilled human gets 4x in 4-8 hours. → the length of tasks AI can reliably complete is doubling every 4 months. and here’s the part that keeps me up at night: in April 2026, Claude-powered agents were given an open AI safety problem and left alone to solve it. two human researchers recovered 23% of the performance gap in a week. the agents recovered 97% in 800 hours. Anthropic calls this recursive self-improvement. AI building AI. getting better. building a better version. repeat. they say we’re not there yet. but they also say it could come sooner than most institutions are prepared for.

do you understand what Anthropic just admitted? their engineers haven’t written most of their own code since early 2026. 80% of the code merged into Anthropic’s codebase last month was written by Claude. let that sink in. the company building the most powerful AI in the world is already being built by that AI. and the numbers keep getting wilder: → engineers are shipping 8x more code than in 2024. not because they’re working harder. because Claude is doing most of it. → Claude’s success rate on open-ended coding problems hit 76% in May 2026. up 50 points in just 6 months. → one Anthropic employee said “it’s been 5 months since I last wrote any code myself.” → Claude Mythos Preview achieved 52x speedup on research optimization. a skilled human gets 4x in 4-8 hours. → the length of tasks AI can reliably complete is doubling every 4 months. and here’s the part that keeps me up at night: in April 2026, Claude-powered agents were given an open AI safety problem and left alone to solve it. two human researchers recovered 23% of the performance gap in a week. the agents recovered 97% in 800 hours. Anthropic calls this recursive self-improvement. AI building AI. getting better. building a better version. repeat. they say we’re not there yet. but they also say it could come sooner than most institutions are prepared for.

Poonam Soni

54,496 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

$80k+/month ad accounts are quietly testing animated object ads not influencers not classic ugc just tiny characters turning everyday problems into visuals you instantly get an aloe cooling down a clam boiling under pressure an avocado stressing on the counter you understand the idea in seconds no long explanations no expert talking the animation does all the selling ai creates the characters ai builds the scenes ai generates dozens of hooks one concept, multiple videos, endless variations to test rt + comment “creatures” and i’ll send the framework (follow for dm)

$80k+/month ad accounts are quietly testing animated object ads not influencers not classic ugc just tiny characters turning everyday problems into visuals you instantly get an aloe cooling down a clam boiling under pressure an avocado stressing on the counter you understand the idea in seconds no long explanations no expert talking the animation does all the selling ai creates the characters ai builds the scenes ai generates dozens of hooks one concept, multiple videos, endless variations to test rt + comment “creatures” and i’ll send the framework (follow for dm)

Alessandro

11,214 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

GITHUB JUST KILLED THE WORST PART OF VIBE CODING they shipped a free tool called Spec Kit and it already crossed 120,000 stars the fix is stupidly simple instead of tossing vague prompts at an agent and praying it doesn't wreck your project Spec Kit makes the AI write a full structured spec before it touches a single line of code it works through the problem first figures out what you want to build asks about the gaps lays out the project then it starts coding you get fewer insane bugs, cleaner output and results you can predict the flow looks like this: /constitution for your rules and standards /specify for what you want to build /clarify for the open questions before you start /plan for architecture and stack /tasks for the ordered work /implement to run it it plugs into Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Gemini CLI and 25+ other agents 120,000 stars, 10,000 forks, open source, shipped by GitHub itself learning to drive agents like this is most of what separates people getting hired as AI engineers from everyone still fighting their prompts

GITHUB JUST KILLED THE WORST PART OF VIBE CODING they shipped a free tool called Spec Kit and it already crossed 120,000 stars the fix is stupidly simple instead of tossing vague prompts at an agent and praying it doesn't wreck your project Spec Kit makes the AI write a full structured spec before it touches a single line of code it works through the problem first figures out what you want to build asks about the gaps lays out the project then it starts coding you get fewer insane bugs, cleaner output and results you can predict the flow looks like this: /constitution for your rules and standards /specify for what you want to build /clarify for the open questions before you start /plan for architecture and stack /tasks for the ordered work /implement to run it it plugs into Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Gemini CLI and 25+ other agents 120,000 stars, 10,000 forks, open source, shipped by GitHub itself learning to drive agents like this is most of what separates people getting hired as AI engineers from everyone still fighting their prompts

Atlas

483,811 просмотров • 3 дней назад

At Uber, design source of truth was a big problem for design and engineering teams. No one knew what the app truly looked like. So every week, a group of designers would sit in a meeting room and check that engineers had correctly implemented the Figma designs. Now coding agents have increased the throughput of changes by an order of magnitude. Keeping up manually has become impossible. Here we used the Revyl to map every state in Ubert (demo uber), navigating our mobile use agent on a cloud iOS simulator. This would have taken a team of designers tens of hours to recreate by hand. We did it in under an hour, asynchronously, with a simple prompt. Let your team see what your users actually see. Empower coding agents to ship a delightful experience with no blindspots. Get started with our free trial and create a map for your own app.

At Uber, design source of truth was a big problem for design and engineering teams. No one knew what the app truly looked like. So every week, a group of designers would sit in a meeting room and check that engineers had correctly implemented the Figma designs. Now coding agents have increased the throughput of changes by an order of magnitude. Keeping up manually has become impossible. Here we used the Revyl to map every state in Ubert (demo uber), navigating our mobile use agent on a cloud iOS simulator. This would have taken a team of designers tens of hours to recreate by hand. We did it in under an hour, asynchronously, with a simple prompt. Let your team see what your users actually see. Empower coding agents to ship a delightful experience with no blindspots. Get started with our free trial and create a map for your own app.

Anam Hira

201,586 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Samsung India, this isn’t how you treat your flagship customers. An S24 Ultra user installs the first One UI 8.5 beta… and suddenly a white dot appears on the display. He contacts support, they assume it’s a green/pink line issue and mention replacement (valid up to S23 series). But this case? Completely different. He goes to the service center… and gets blamed instead. A minor dent from one year ago is now suddenly the cause? So what are we saying here, the customer is lying?🤔 Yes, beta comes with risk. Users understand that. But these are also the same users helping you test, improve, and refine your software. This kind of handling? Not acceptable. Samsung India management needs to look into this and ensure proper assistance is provided, along with better guidance on how customer service should respond. Flagship users deserve better support not assumptions.

Samsung India, this isn’t how you treat your flagship customers. An S24 Ultra user installs the first One UI 8.5 beta… and suddenly a white dot appears on the display. He contacts support, they assume it’s a green/pink line issue and mention replacement (valid up to S23 series). But this case? Completely different. He goes to the service center… and gets blamed instead. A minor dent from one year ago is now suddenly the cause? So what are we saying here, the customer is lying?🤔 Yes, beta comes with risk. Users understand that. But these are also the same users helping you test, improve, and refine your software. This kind of handling? Not acceptable. Samsung India management needs to look into this and ensure proper assistance is provided, along with better guidance on how customer service should respond. Flagship users deserve better support not assumptions.

W

84,600 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$I built a content engine that runs on telegram. Two commands... /discover: sends out to 9 sources across HackerNews, Reddit communities covering AI automation, prompt engineering, vibe coding, and specialist newsletters. Pulls everything published in the last 24 hours, runs each item through an AI extraction layer that scores it against 100+ niche keywords, deduplicates, and drops the relevant ideas into a Notion database. Takes about 90 seconds. Costs fractions of a cent. /ideas: this command pulls the top scored ideas from that database, randomizes the selection so you're not seeing the same ones every time, and sends them to you in a clean numbered list. You reply with /write 3 or whatever you choose, and the system researches the topic using Perplexity's live web search, generates three distinct outline options with different angles and hooks, saves them to a Google Doc, and sends you a message telling you they're ready. You read the outlines, and you pick one. You then reply with the command /outline 2. The system writes the full piece in your voice, following your brand guidelines, with specific examples and concrete claims. It can be done in under two minutes of your time. The whole thing runs on n8n, with no subscriptions beyond what you already use. If content takes too long or you don't have ideas, this solves that. I built this for myself; I can do it for you. If you're tired of knowing you should be posting and still not doing it, let's talk.$

I built a content engine that runs on telegram. Two commands... /discover: sends out to 9 sources across HackerNews, Reddit communities covering AI automation, prompt engineering, vibe coding, and specialist newsletters. Pulls everything published in the last 24 hours, runs each item through an AI extraction layer that scores it against 100+ niche keywords, deduplicates, and drops the relevant ideas into a Notion database. Takes about 90 seconds. Costs fractions of a cent. /ideas: this command pulls the top scored ideas from that database, randomizes the selection so you're not seeing the same ones every time, and sends them to you in a clean numbered list. You reply with /write 3 or whatever you choose, and the system researches the topic using Perplexity's live web search, generates three distinct outline options with different angles and hooks, saves them to a Google Doc, and sends you a message telling you they're ready. You read the outlines, and you pick one. You then reply with the command /outline 2. The system writes the full piece in your voice, following your brand guidelines, with specific examples and concrete claims. It can be done in under two minutes of your time. The whole thing runs on n8n, with no subscriptions beyond what you already use. If content takes too long or you don't have ideas, this solves that. I built this for myself; I can do it for you. If you're tired of knowing you should be posting and still not doing it, let's talk.

Savvy | Ai & Automation

14,879 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Introducing the Buy-Side Equity Research SOP on xBubble. State a ticker. Get a research memo built to the standard of an internal buy-side note. Thesis first, every number sourced to the original filing. One request in. A full equity deep dive out. What comes back isn't a news recap. It's the structure a real analyst writes: ✅ Where the company sits in its value chain ✅ Competitive map, edge, and key risks ✅ Filing-level financials + management read ✅ SOTP valuation, Bull / Base / Bear per share ✅ The catalysts to watch over the next 3 to 6 months Every claim is traceable. Each data point carries its original source and access date: SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K), official IR decks, earnings call transcripts. You can check the work. That's the point. Here's what makes this more than one good report. The SOP isn't fixed. Bubble Engine builds it, tests it, and keeps generating stronger ones. Need a version tuned to a sector, a market, or your own thesis style? It generates that too. You don't get a template. You get a research engine. Buy-side research used to take 15 to 20 hours per company. Now it's one request. The edge was never about access. It was about depth. xBubble puts the depth on your side. Work mode → Buy-Side Equity Research SOP.

Introducing the Buy-Side Equity Research SOP on xBubble. State a ticker. Get a research memo built to the standard of an internal buy-side note. Thesis first, every number sourced to the original filing. One request in. A full equity deep dive out. What comes back isn't a news recap. It's the structure a real analyst writes: ✅ Where the company sits in its value chain ✅ Competitive map, edge, and key risks ✅ Filing-level financials + management read ✅ SOTP valuation, Bull / Base / Bear per share ✅ The catalysts to watch over the next 3 to 6 months Every claim is traceable. Each data point carries its original source and access date: SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K), official IR decks, earnings call transcripts. You can check the work. That's the point. Here's what makes this more than one good report. The SOP isn't fixed. Bubble Engine builds it, tests it, and keeps generating stronger ones. Need a version tuned to a sector, a market, or your own thesis style? It generates that too. You don't get a template. You get a research engine. Buy-side research used to take 15 to 20 hours per company. Now it's one request. The edge was never about access. It was about depth. xBubble puts the depth on your side. Work mode → Buy-Side Equity Research SOP.

DAPPOS

427,279 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Our first test flight is just the beginning! Behind the scenes, we are focused on up-scaling and improving our technology. We are excited to announce that we have successfully tested the central subsystem of our Helix 2.0 oxygen-rich staged-combustion engine: the powerpack. We have performed two successful hot-fire tests in which we have shown steady-state operation and cavitation limits. The powerpack incorporates the turbopump and pre-burner(s). It is the most complex as well as the most mechanically and thermally stressed subsystem of a staged-combustion engine. This milestone validated key technological challenges, such as the simultaneous ignition of multiple pre-burners and turbopump cavitation performance. The results are in-line with the predictions from our design models. The closed-cycle architecture of Helix allows us to push the performance envelope further: Helix 2.0 is designed to deliver double the thrust (200kN), while mass, production technology and costs remain comparable to Helix 1.0. The result for our customers: more payload for a lower budget! Excited about this news? Check out our career portal for employment opportunities and help us to elevate our Helix staged-combustion engine technology to the next level! ➡️

Our first test flight is just the beginning! Behind the scenes, we are focused on up-scaling and improving our technology. We are excited to announce that we have successfully tested the central subsystem of our Helix 2.0 oxygen-rich staged-combustion engine: the powerpack. We have performed two successful hot-fire tests in which we have shown steady-state operation and cavitation limits. The powerpack incorporates the turbopump and pre-burner(s). It is the most complex as well as the most mechanically and thermally stressed subsystem of a staged-combustion engine. This milestone validated key technological challenges, such as the simultaneous ignition of multiple pre-burners and turbopump cavitation performance. The results are in-line with the predictions from our design models. The closed-cycle architecture of Helix allows us to push the performance envelope further: Helix 2.0 is designed to deliver double the thrust (200kN), while mass, production technology and costs remain comparable to Helix 1.0. The result for our customers: more payload for a lower budget! Excited about this news? Check out our career portal for employment opportunities and help us to elevate our Helix staged-combustion engine technology to the next level! ➡️

Rocket Factory Augsburg

32,896 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Karpathy's Agentic Engineering finally has proper tooling! (built by Google) Karpathy defined agentic engineering as the discipline that separates production agent work from vibe coding. The core skills he listed were spec design, eval loops, and security oversight. The problem has been that practicing this still requires a different tool for every phase: - editor for code - a terminal for scaffolding - a browser for testing - a cloud console for deployment - and a separate framework for evals. Every transition is a context switch. The solution to production-grade Agentic Engineering is now actually implemented in Google’s Agents CLI. It covers the entire workflow in one place for scaffolding, evaluating, and deploying ADK agents. One setup command injects 7 ADK-specific skills into a coding agent's context, which lets it handle scaffolding, evals, deployment, and enterprise registration through natural language. I tested this end-to-end by building a RAG agent from scratch using Claude Code. It scaffolded the full project from the ADK agentic_rag template, generated 20 eval scenarios with LLM-as-judge scoring, and returned a quantitative scorecard. Finally, it also deployed everything to Agent Runtime and registered the agent to Gemini Enterprise, so the entire org can discover and use it. The video below shows this in action, and I worked with the Google Cloud team to put this together. Agents CLI GitHub repo → (don't forget to star it ⭐ ) I wrote up the full build covering all six steps from install to enterprise registration. It includes the eval scorecard, the instruction loophole the eval caught before deployment, and what the deployment process actually looks like end-to-end. Read it below.

Karpathy's Agentic Engineering finally has proper tooling! (built by Google) Karpathy defined agentic engineering as the discipline that separates production agent work from vibe coding. The core skills he listed were spec design, eval loops, and security oversight. The problem has been that practicing this still requires a different tool for every phase: - editor for code - a terminal for scaffolding - a browser for testing - a cloud console for deployment - and a separate framework for evals. Every transition is a context switch. The solution to production-grade Agentic Engineering is now actually implemented in Google’s Agents CLI. It covers the entire workflow in one place for scaffolding, evaluating, and deploying ADK agents. One setup command injects 7 ADK-specific skills into a coding agent's context, which lets it handle scaffolding, evals, deployment, and enterprise registration through natural language. I tested this end-to-end by building a RAG agent from scratch using Claude Code. It scaffolded the full project from the ADK agentic_rag template, generated 20 eval scenarios with LLM-as-judge scoring, and returned a quantitative scorecard. Finally, it also deployed everything to Agent Runtime and registered the agent to Gemini Enterprise, so the entire org can discover and use it. The video below shows this in action, and I worked with the Google Cloud team to put this together. Agents CLI GitHub repo → (don't forget to star it ⭐ ) I wrote up the full build covering all six steps from install to enterprise registration. It includes the eval scorecard, the instruction loophole the eval caught before deployment, and what the deployment process actually looks like end-to-end. Read it below.

Akshay 🚀

255,129 просмотров • 18 дней назад