正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

USPS Moves Forward With Major Mail-In Voting Change The U.S. Postal Service is proceeding with a significant new rule for mail-in ballots following a federal appeals court decision on Friday. The change requires states to provide voter lists and serialized ballot barcodes before federal ballots are mailed — a... show more

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

387,880 subscribers

71,212 次观看 • 12 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨#BREAKING: Federal authorities have arrested a U.S. Postal worker for discarding thousands of pieces of mail, including political mailings and some election ballots. 📌#Orlando | #Florida Federal authorities have arrested U.S. mail carrier Ottis McCoy, accused of dumping over 1,000 pieces of mail, including 400 political mailings and an election ballot, in a wooded area instead of delivering them on his Orlando, Florida, route. According to court documents, a co-worker reported to McCoy’s manager that he returned unusually early despite leaving with a large amount of mail. GPS data showed McCoy had diverted to a wooded area, where the co-worker later found scattered mail.

🚨#BREAKING: Federal authorities have arrested a U.S. Postal worker for discarding thousands of pieces of mail, including political mailings and some election ballots. 📌#Orlando | #Florida Federal authorities have arrested U.S. mail carrier Ottis McCoy, accused of dumping over 1,000 pieces of mail, including 400 political mailings and an election ballot, in a wooded area instead of delivering them on his Orlando, Florida, route. According to court documents, a co-worker reported to McCoy’s manager that he returned unusually early despite leaving with a large amount of mail. GPS data showed McCoy had diverted to a wooded area, where the co-worker later found scattered mail.

R A W S A L E R T S

1,903,867 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Big news for election integrity: A key Supreme Court case (Watson v. RNC) — challenging state laws allowing mail-in ballots received after Election Day (even if postmarked on time) — could finally END delayed vote counts in California and ~14 other states. No more waiting days/weeks for those ballots — like the ongoing drama in the LA Mayor race where Spencer Pratt’s lead evaporated amid late surges. Decision expected this month before the justices’ summer recess. Americans deserve results we can trust on Election Night. Timely, transparent counts build confidence. This could be a game-changer for fair elections nationwide. Should every state close the ballot box on Election Day? (Video: AI)

🚨 Big news for election integrity: A key Supreme Court case (Watson v. RNC) — challenging state laws allowing mail-in ballots received after Election Day (even if postmarked on time) — could finally END delayed vote counts in California and ~14 other states. No more waiting days/weeks for those ballots — like the ongoing drama in the LA Mayor race where Spencer Pratt’s lead evaporated amid late surges. Decision expected this month before the justices’ summer recess. Americans deserve results we can trust on Election Night. Timely, transparent counts build confidence. This could be a game-changer for fair elections nationwide. Should every state close the ballot box on Election Day? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

142,308 次观看 • 1 个月前

TRUMP JUST ENDED THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Is Trump finally ending mail-in voter fraud? He fired the three remaining commissioners this week, leaving the board with zero members. The EAC is the obscure little agency that sets voting machine standards and controls the federal mail voter registration form. Here is the real story behind it. For over a year Trump has pushed two basic reforms through that commission: proof of citizenship to register, and rules requiring USPS to stop blindly mailing ballots to anyone without verifying they are eligible for mail voting. The old board slow walked both. So he cleared it out. Replacements need Senate confirmation, this is not a hostile takeover, it is the president using the power the Supreme Court just confirmed he has! Now the post office piece. Trump's executive order directs USPS to track ballots and only deliver them to voters on an approved list. Courts have already blocked several parts of it, ruling the president cannot unilaterally rewrite election rules, that power sits with states and Congress. What this really means is Trump keeps applying pressure on citizenship verification and mail ballot accountability heading into the midterms. Democrats are calling it interference because tighter verification makes it harder to run up numbers through a system nobody can fully audit. This is a developing story. Nothing is more important for November than voter integrity.

TRUMP JUST ENDED THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Is Trump finally ending mail-in voter fraud? He fired the three remaining commissioners this week, leaving the board with zero members. The EAC is the obscure little agency that sets voting machine standards and controls the federal mail voter registration form. Here is the real story behind it. For over a year Trump has pushed two basic reforms through that commission: proof of citizenship to register, and rules requiring USPS to stop blindly mailing ballots to anyone without verifying they are eligible for mail voting. The old board slow walked both. So he cleared it out. Replacements need Senate confirmation, this is not a hostile takeover, it is the president using the power the Supreme Court just confirmed he has! Now the post office piece. Trump's executive order directs USPS to track ballots and only deliver them to voters on an approved list. Courts have already blocked several parts of it, ruling the president cannot unilaterally rewrite election rules, that power sits with states and Congress. What this really means is Trump keeps applying pressure on citizenship verification and mail ballot accountability heading into the midterms. Democrats are calling it interference because tighter verification makes it harder to run up numbers through a system nobody can fully audit. This is a developing story. Nothing is more important for November than voter integrity.

Bill Mitchell

90,829 次观看 • 20 天前

🚨 Bay Area thieves swiped a batch of mail-in ballots during California’s June 2 primary — another glaring example of why mail-in voting remains vulnerable. About 29 ballots were stolen from collection boxes or mail, later recovered from stolen mail bins at a Grocery Outlet. Officials verified and counted them this time… but what about the ones that aren’t recovered? California’s painfully slow vote counts are already under scrutiny (with LA mayor and governor races still unresolved). Mail theft happens repeatedly in the state — this isn’t an isolated incident. In-person voting with ID is the gold standard for security and trust. We need reforms to protect every vote. Is it time to tighten up the mail-in processes or remove them completely? (Video: AI)

🚨 Bay Area thieves swiped a batch of mail-in ballots during California’s June 2 primary — another glaring example of why mail-in voting remains vulnerable. About 29 ballots were stolen from collection boxes or mail, later recovered from stolen mail bins at a Grocery Outlet. Officials verified and counted them this time… but what about the ones that aren’t recovered? California’s painfully slow vote counts are already under scrutiny (with LA mayor and governor races still unresolved). Mail theft happens repeatedly in the state — this isn’t an isolated incident. In-person voting with ID is the gold standard for security and trust. We need reforms to protect every vote. Is it time to tighten up the mail-in processes or remove them completely? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

26,914 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Late-night votes just flipped the 2026 CA Governor race. As of June 5, with only 60% of ballots counted days after the election, DDHQ has called it for Becerra — projecting mail-in ballots will push him past Hilton for the top spot. Current snapshot: • Hilton: 27.18% (1,535,566 votes) • Becerra: 26.04% (1,470,970 votes) ✅ • Steyer: 20.19% Top 2 advance to November. California’s mail-in ballot system is a mess — slow counts, massive delays, and lingering doubt. This is exactly why the SAVE America Act is critical for securing our federal elections. Clean, fair, and timely voting matters. 🇺🇸 Should the federal government pass requirements for state elections such as for governor and mayor that mandate a certain time turnaround? (Video: AI)

🚨 Late-night votes just flipped the 2026 CA Governor race. As of June 5, with only 60% of ballots counted days after the election, DDHQ has called it for Becerra — projecting mail-in ballots will push him past Hilton for the top spot. Current snapshot: • Hilton: 27.18% (1,535,566 votes) • Becerra: 26.04% (1,470,970 votes) ✅ • Steyer: 20.19% Top 2 advance to November. California’s mail-in ballot system is a mess — slow counts, massive delays, and lingering doubt. This is exactly why the SAVE America Act is critical for securing our federal elections. Clean, fair, and timely voting matters. 🇺🇸 Should the federal government pass requirements for state elections such as for governor and mayor that mandate a certain time turnaround? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

137,870 次观看 • 1 个月前

And here is, the Arizona Senate Audit of the 2020 election, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT Katie Hobbs and her co-conspirator Adrian Fontes utilizing their single greatest crime of 2020 and 2022 for the 2024 presidential elections, 25% of all 2020 mail-in-ballots equaling 420,987 ballots out of 1.9 million, CONFIRMED to have NO signature match whatsoever. And this is just in Maricopa County alone. Meaning, Rigged voter rolls + Mail in ballots + Illegal Aliens = criminal conspiracy to overthrow the United States government,

And here is, the Arizona Senate Audit of the 2020 election, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT Katie Hobbs and her co-conspirator Adrian Fontes utilizing their single greatest crime of 2020 and 2022 for the 2024 presidential elections, 25% of all 2020 mail-in-ballots equaling 420,987 ballots out of 1.9 million, CONFIRMED to have NO signature match whatsoever. And this is just in Maricopa County alone. Meaning, Rigged voter rolls + Mail in ballots + Illegal Aliens = criminal conspiracy to overthrow the United States government,

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

51,893 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Allows Late Ballots in 30+ States — (Video: AI) How ridiculous is it that ballots arriving after Election Day can still be counted in Mississippi and roughly 30 other states? The Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling (written by Justice Barrett) lets states keep counting absentee ballots mailed by Election Day but received days later. This creates uncertainty and opens the door to questions about election integrity. Shame on SCOTUS for failing to enforce a clear, uniform Election Day deadline. Do you think ballots arriving after Election Day should be counted, or does this undermine trust in our elections?

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Allows Late Ballots in 30+ States — (Video: AI) How ridiculous is it that ballots arriving after Election Day can still be counted in Mississippi and roughly 30 other states? The Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling (written by Justice Barrett) lets states keep counting absentee ballots mailed by Election Day but received days later. This creates uncertainty and opens the door to questions about election integrity. Shame on SCOTUS for failing to enforce a clear, uniform Election Day deadline. Do you think ballots arriving after Election Day should be counted, or does this undermine trust in our elections?

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

25,070 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸 THE COURTS SCREW US AGAIN! - Why can't we just get the courts to go along with preventing mail-in ballot fraud? Let me paint the picture for you. Back in March, Trump signed an executive order on mail voting. Homeland Security would build a list of confirmed citizens eligible to vote in each state, pulled from citizenship and naturalization records. The Postal Service would then deliver ballots only to people on that list. Simple. Verify the citizen, then mail the ballot. And the courts are actually blocking this! A judge in Boston froze it on June 25 after 23 states and DC sued. Saturday the First Circuit backed her two to one, three months out from the midterms! Frustration! But let's look closer at that ruling: The appeals court never decided whether the order is actually legal. Justice argued the suit "came too early" since no agency had finalized any rules, and the panel simply said the states can sue now instead of waiting. That's a fight over timing, not the merits. A damned technicality! And a judge in Washington already went the other way on a similar challenge. This is a split heading for the Supreme Court, not a settled verdict! Once again everyone is punting! France banned mail voting back in 1975 after ballots in Corsica were cast for dead men. Why can't America just get this right? So what now? The judge said Congress never gave the President this power, and she has a point. There's already a bill for that. It's called the SAVE America Act. Once again the courts have failed us on election integrity. Am I looking at this wrong? ⬇️

🇺🇸 THE COURTS SCREW US AGAIN! - Why can't we just get the courts to go along with preventing mail-in ballot fraud? Let me paint the picture for you. Back in March, Trump signed an executive order on mail voting. Homeland Security would build a list of confirmed citizens eligible to vote in each state, pulled from citizenship and naturalization records. The Postal Service would then deliver ballots only to people on that list. Simple. Verify the citizen, then mail the ballot. And the courts are actually blocking this! A judge in Boston froze it on June 25 after 23 states and DC sued. Saturday the First Circuit backed her two to one, three months out from the midterms! Frustration! But let's look closer at that ruling: The appeals court never decided whether the order is actually legal. Justice argued the suit "came too early" since no agency had finalized any rules, and the panel simply said the states can sue now instead of waiting. That's a fight over timing, not the merits. A damned technicality! And a judge in Washington already went the other way on a similar challenge. This is a split heading for the Supreme Court, not a settled verdict! Once again everyone is punting! France banned mail voting back in 1975 after ballots in Corsica were cast for dead men. Why can't America just get this right? So what now? The judge said Congress never gave the President this power, and she has a point. There's already a bill for that. It's called the SAVE America Act. Once again the courts have failed us on election integrity. Am I looking at this wrong? ⬇️

Bill Mitchell

15,450 次观看 • 4 天前

BREAKING: An individual was caught on tape in the Crown Heights neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York, in the act of stealing a bag containing mail. It is possible that the bag contained election ballots. Crown Heights has a large Jewish population, and many are voting for Trump.

BREAKING: An individual was caught on tape in the Crown Heights neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York, in the act of stealing a bag containing mail. It is possible that the bag contained election ballots. Crown Heights has a large Jewish population, and many are voting for Trump.

BREAKING NEWS

914,226 次观看 • 1 年前

South Korea's election commission finally addressed transparency concerns. Their solution: make the ballot box stand clear. Not the box. The stand. For years, South Korea's National Election Commission has faced mounting questions about election integrity: ･ Ballots stored in plastic shopping bags (2022) ･ 30-40 ballots removed from a Seoul polling station during early voting (May 2025) ･ Old 2024 general election ballots found inside 2025 presidential election boxes ･ A poll worker arrested for voting with her spouse's ID ･ The NEC's own cybersecurity was breached in a 2023 test by the National Intelligence Service ･ The NEC refused to meet with a U.S. election monitoring delegation that traveled to Korea specifically to observe ･ The NEC proposed making it a crime — punishable by up to 10 years in prison — to publicly question election results. It backed down only after a public outcry. Citizens demanded structural reform. Independent oversight. The NEC's answer for the June 3 local elections: a see-through plastic stand. The ballots themselves still go into thin bags inside. Koreans are fed up. "Is this a joke?" they're asking. Sources: Korea Herald — "Ballots and Blunders" editorial Asia Times — "Mismanaged early voting stirs voter distrust"

South Korea's election commission finally addressed transparency concerns. Their solution: make the ballot box stand clear. Not the box. The stand. For years, South Korea's National Election Commission has faced mounting questions about election integrity: ･ Ballots stored in plastic shopping bags (2022) ･ 30-40 ballots removed from a Seoul polling station during early voting (May 2025) ･ Old 2024 general election ballots found inside 2025 presidential election boxes ･ A poll worker arrested for voting with her spouse's ID ･ The NEC's own cybersecurity was breached in a 2023 test by the National Intelligence Service ･ The NEC refused to meet with a U.S. election monitoring delegation that traveled to Korea specifically to observe ･ The NEC proposed making it a crime — punishable by up to 10 years in prison — to publicly question election results. It backed down only after a public outcry. Citizens demanded structural reform. Independent oversight. The NEC's answer for the June 3 local elections: a see-through plastic stand. The ballots themselves still go into thin bags inside. Koreans are fed up. "Is this a joke?" they're asking. Sources: Korea Herald — "Ballots and Blunders" editorial Asia Times — "Mismanaged early voting stirs voter distrust"

The Monarch Report

16,176 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 DeWine Vetoes Photo ID for Mail-In Voting: Traitor to Election Integrity! Why is a Republican governor blocking basic voter ID protections? Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine just vetoed legislation that would have required photo ID to cast mail-in ballots — calling it too much “burden” despite the obvious need for security. DeWine is a traitor to commonsense election reform. Every state should require voter ID to protect our votes! Shame on him for siding with open-door policies over secure elections. America demands real integrity at the ballot box — no more excuses. Do you think it’s time to hold RINOs like DeWine accountable and push voter ID nationwide? (Video: AI)

🚨 DeWine Vetoes Photo ID for Mail-In Voting: Traitor to Election Integrity! Why is a Republican governor blocking basic voter ID protections? Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine just vetoed legislation that would have required photo ID to cast mail-in ballots — calling it too much “burden” despite the obvious need for security. DeWine is a traitor to commonsense election reform. Every state should require voter ID to protect our votes! Shame on him for siding with open-door policies over secure elections. America demands real integrity at the ballot box — no more excuses. Do you think it’s time to hold RINOs like DeWine accountable and push voter ID nationwide? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

28,022 次观看 • 1 个月前

Abbott: We are following the voting rights act. All we are doing is, in the aftermath of a legal decision last year by the federal court of appeals, we are no longer required to have what are called coalition districts. We are able to draw lines consistent with voter preferences

Abbott: We are following the voting rights act. All we are doing is, in the aftermath of a legal decision last year by the federal court of appeals, we are no longer required to have what are called coalition districts. We are able to draw lines consistent with voter preferences

Acyn

52,621 次观看 • 11 个月前

President Trump is calling it out loud and clear. There’s BIG cheating happening in California right now. Votes are tied up, counting is deliberately slow, and massive numbers of late mail-in ballots are flooding in — all while the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles is already investigating. Democrats are trying to steal both the Governor primary and the LA Mayor primary from two strong Republican candidates. This is the same broken system we’ve seen for years: endless delays, zero transparency, and mail-in ballots that arrive days after Election Day. Why does California keep doing this? Why are the results still not finalized days later? What’s Gavin Newsom up to? (Video: AI)

President Trump is calling it out loud and clear. There’s BIG cheating happening in California right now. Votes are tied up, counting is deliberately slow, and massive numbers of late mail-in ballots are flooding in — all while the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles is already investigating. Democrats are trying to steal both the Governor primary and the LA Mayor primary from two strong Republican candidates. This is the same broken system we’ve seen for years: endless delays, zero transparency, and mail-in ballots that arrive days after Election Day. Why does California keep doing this? Why are the results still not finalized days later? What’s Gavin Newsom up to? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

64,523 次观看 • 1 个月前

Big voter fraud: 17% of mail-in voters admitted to voting in a state where they don’t live 21% admitted to filling out someone else’s ballot 8% revealed they were bribed to vote Voter fraud is happening on a huge scale. Nuke the filibuster and pass the SAVE Act!

Big voter fraud: 17% of mail-in voters admitted to voting in a state where they don’t live 21% admitted to filling out someone else’s ballot 8% revealed they were bribed to vote Voter fraud is happening on a huge scale. Nuke the filibuster and pass the SAVE Act!

Taya

37,994 次观看 • 6 个月前

💔 ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.

💔 ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.

Bill Mitchell

290,077 次观看 • 1 个月前

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity. Read these words carefully. Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory. He went further. Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it. On fraud, Alito was surgical. He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider. Then Alito did something remarkable. He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020. He also torched the majority's logic directly. Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives. He also raised something nobody else is talking about. What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings. Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it. And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against. History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today. The question is what we do with it.

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity. Read these words carefully. Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory. He went further. Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it. On fraud, Alito was surgical. He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider. Then Alito did something remarkable. He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020. He also torched the majority's logic directly. Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives. He also raised something nobody else is talking about. What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings. Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it. And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against. History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today. The question is what we do with it.

Bill Mitchell

248,725 次观看 • 1 个月前

New vote totals just dropped in the 2026 California Governor race — and Steve Hilton is still leading with 27.57% (1.42M votes) as of this morning. Xavier Becerra trails closely at 25.57%, with nearly 42% of ballots still uncounted. It’s been two full days since the June 2 election and California has only counted about 5.15 million votes. Why does it take this long every cycle with mail-in ballots, processing delays, and bureaucracy? Voters deserve faster, more transparent results. How long will this race actually take to call — and how long should it reasonably take in a modern election? (Video: AI)

New vote totals just dropped in the 2026 California Governor race — and Steve Hilton is still leading with 27.57% (1.42M votes) as of this morning. Xavier Becerra trails closely at 25.57%, with nearly 42% of ballots still uncounted. It’s been two full days since the June 2 election and California has only counted about 5.15 million votes. Why does it take this long every cycle with mail-in ballots, processing delays, and bureaucracy? Voters deserve faster, more transparent results. How long will this race actually take to call — and how long should it reasonably take in a modern election? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

209,734 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨#BREAKING: California officials have announced that a 62-year-old woman has been charged with six felonies after registering her dog to vote and casting multiple mail-in ballots in the animal’s name. While the fraudulent ballot was accepted during the 2021 recall election of Governor Gavin Newsom, it was flagged and rejected in 2022.

🚨#BREAKING: California officials have announced that a 62-year-old woman has been charged with six felonies after registering her dog to vote and casting multiple mail-in ballots in the animal’s name. While the fraudulent ballot was accepted during the 2021 recall election of Governor Gavin Newsom, it was flagged and rejected in 2022.

R A W S A L E R T S

524,515 次观看 • 10 个月前

Someone explain how this is legal No seriously, how do ballot drop boxes make any sense. They are out here unattended, anyone can come here at any time and drop as many ballots in as they want This is San Diego, California but they’re all over America Ballot drop boxes have legitimate security vulnerabilities: - Drop boxes, including in San Diego, sit in public places like parks, libraries, or sidewalks with no human monitoring. A motivated actor could insert pre-filled fraudulent ballots, especially if ballot harvesting or third-party collection is involved - Vandalism Incidents occur nationwide every election with drop boxes - There are ‘Chain of Custody Gaps.’ Ballots sit inside until scheduled pickups, delays and improper seals create windows for interference There is real evidence for this, reports from San Diego in the Chula Vista area highlighted improperly affixed seals on Election Day In states like California with universal mail-in ballots, drop boxes amplify concerns about signature verification failures and harvesting coercion and of course non-citizen and duplicate voting You want to know how you they are being used to rig elections? Because California mandated them LIn California law requires counties to provide drop boxes at least one per 30,000 voters or minimums Democrats rig elections

Someone explain how this is legal No seriously, how do ballot drop boxes make any sense. They are out here unattended, anyone can come here at any time and drop as many ballots in as they want This is San Diego, California but they’re all over America Ballot drop boxes have legitimate security vulnerabilities: - Drop boxes, including in San Diego, sit in public places like parks, libraries, or sidewalks with no human monitoring. A motivated actor could insert pre-filled fraudulent ballots, especially if ballot harvesting or third-party collection is involved - Vandalism Incidents occur nationwide every election with drop boxes - There are ‘Chain of Custody Gaps.’ Ballots sit inside until scheduled pickups, delays and improper seals create windows for interference There is real evidence for this, reports from San Diego in the Chula Vista area highlighted improperly affixed seals on Election Day In states like California with universal mail-in ballots, drop boxes amplify concerns about signature verification failures and harvesting coercion and of course non-citizen and duplicate voting You want to know how you they are being used to rig elections? Because California mandated them LIn California law requires counties to provide drop boxes at least one per 30,000 voters or minimums Democrats rig elections

Wall Street Apes

100,208 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gavin Newsom has rigged California elections in every possible way. Requiring ID to vote is illegal. Universal mail in ballots are the easiest way to commit fraud. The DMV automatically registers people to vote. Ballot harvesting is legal. They made it illegal to hand count ballots. There’s no set time limit for how long pulling stations have to count the votes. Now he stands in front of the camera, with all the worst California Democrats standing behind him, and tells you that democracy depends on him rigging California elections even further.

Gavin Newsom has rigged California elections in every possible way. Requiring ID to vote is illegal. Universal mail in ballots are the easiest way to commit fraud. The DMV automatically registers people to vote. Ballot harvesting is legal. They made it illegal to hand count ballots. There’s no set time limit for how long pulling stations have to count the votes. Now he stands in front of the camera, with all the worst California Democrats standing behind him, and tells you that democracy depends on him rigging California elections even further.

Michael Oxford - AKA The Santa Cruz Mountain Goat

568,051 次观看 • 11 个月前