Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

USPS Moves Forward With Major Mail-In Voting Change The U.S. Postal Service is proceeding with a significant new rule for mail-in ballots following a federal appeals court decision on Friday. The change requires states to provide voter lists and serialized ballot barcodes before federal ballots are mailed — a... show more

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

387,880 subscribers

71,212 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

VICTORY! The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to allow President Trump’s Executive Order on mail-in ballots for this November’s elections to continue. The EO directs the United States Postal Service to ONLY deliver mail-in ballots to eligible voters. How could anyone be against this? Opponents to only lawful voters receiving ballots are having a MELTDOWN over this victory.

VICTORY! The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to allow President Trump’s Executive Order on mail-in ballots for this November’s elections to continue. The EO directs the United States Postal Service to ONLY deliver mail-in ballots to eligible voters. How could anyone be against this? Opponents to only lawful voters receiving ballots are having a MELTDOWN over this victory.

ThePersistence

215,308 views • 26 days ago

🚨HUGE NEWS: A federal judge in Massachusetts has just BLOCKED the U.S. Postal Service from enforcing Trump’s new mail-voting restrictions, ruling the executive order unconstitutional. This is a major victory for ballot access and protects MILLIONS of voters!!!

🚨HUGE NEWS: A federal judge in Massachusetts has just BLOCKED the U.S. Postal Service from enforcing Trump’s new mail-voting restrictions, ruling the executive order unconstitutional. This is a major victory for ballot access and protects MILLIONS of voters!!!

CALL TO ACTIVISM

180,331 views • 15 days ago

🚨 JUST IN: Leftist Judge Indira Talwani is FURIOUS after President Trump's Postal Service filed mail-in ballot rules for the midterms — she just ordered Trump to give a response by Tuesday, or she will BLOCK publication of the rule This election integrity TRAITOR is on a POWER TRIP!! The USPS rules will simply ensure security and tracking of mail-in ballots + that lists are turned over to the federal government, or they won't have their ballots sent. This fight is not over. SCOTUS SHOULD STRIKE HER DOWN ASAP!

🚨 JUST IN: Leftist Judge Indira Talwani is FURIOUS after President Trump's Postal Service filed mail-in ballot rules for the midterms — she just ordered Trump to give a response by Tuesday, or she will BLOCK publication of the rule This election integrity TRAITOR is on a POWER TRIP!! The USPS rules will simply ensure security and tracking of mail-in ballots + that lists are turned over to the federal government, or they won't have their ballots sent. This fight is not over. SCOTUS SHOULD STRIKE HER DOWN ASAP!

Eric Daugherty

289,630 views • 27 days ago

This is raising the pressure on the Senate to pass the SAVE America Act Obama appointed judge in Boston has blocked President Trump from requiring proof of citizenship and mail-in ballot tracking for the November midterms across two dozen democrat states. The June 2026 Ruling: Judge Indira Talwani issued a preliminary injunction against a March executive order. The order directed the DHS and SSA to build "Confirmed Citizen Lists" and instructed the USPS to only deliver mail-in ballots to individuals on those approved lists. The Legal Reasoning: Judge Talwani ruled the provisions "legally void" for violating the separation of powers. She stated the Constitution does not grant the President specific power over elections, and Congress never authorized the USPS to regulate mail-in ballot delivery. The June 24 Ruling: This followed a decision by Chief Judge Denise Casper, who permanently blocked a separate 2025 order. That order attempted to require documentary proof of citizenship on federal voter registration forms and limit the counting of late mail-in ballots. What Happens Next? The injunctions currently apply to the 23 plaintiff states and Washington, D.C. (including swing states like Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin). Because the Senate has not passed the SAVE Act to codify these citizenship verification rules into federal law, the battle now shifts to the federal appeals courts and potentially the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is raising the pressure on the Senate to pass the SAVE America Act Obama appointed judge in Boston has blocked President Trump from requiring proof of citizenship and mail-in ballot tracking for the November midterms across two dozen democrat states. The June 2026 Ruling: Judge Indira Talwani issued a preliminary injunction against a March executive order. The order directed the DHS and SSA to build "Confirmed Citizen Lists" and instructed the USPS to only deliver mail-in ballots to individuals on those approved lists. The Legal Reasoning: Judge Talwani ruled the provisions "legally void" for violating the separation of powers. She stated the Constitution does not grant the President specific power over elections, and Congress never authorized the USPS to regulate mail-in ballot delivery. The June 24 Ruling: This followed a decision by Chief Judge Denise Casper, who permanently blocked a separate 2025 order. That order attempted to require documentary proof of citizenship on federal voter registration forms and limit the counting of late mail-in ballots. What Happens Next? The injunctions currently apply to the 23 plaintiff states and Washington, D.C. (including swing states like Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin). Because the Senate has not passed the SAVE Act to codify these citizenship verification rules into federal law, the battle now shifts to the federal appeals courts and potentially the U.S. Supreme Court.

Victor Bigham 🇺🇸

12,709 views • 1 month ago

🚨#BREAKING: Federal authorities have arrested a U.S. Postal worker for discarding thousands of pieces of mail, including political mailings and some election ballots. 📌#Orlando | #Florida Federal authorities have arrested U.S. mail carrier Ottis McCoy, accused of dumping over 1,000 pieces of mail, including 400 political mailings and an election ballot, in a wooded area instead of delivering them on his Orlando, Florida, route. According to court documents, a co-worker reported to McCoy’s manager that he returned unusually early despite leaving with a large amount of mail. GPS data showed McCoy had diverted to a wooded area, where the co-worker later found scattered mail.

🚨#BREAKING: Federal authorities have arrested a U.S. Postal worker for discarding thousands of pieces of mail, including political mailings and some election ballots. 📌#Orlando | #Florida Federal authorities have arrested U.S. mail carrier Ottis McCoy, accused of dumping over 1,000 pieces of mail, including 400 political mailings and an election ballot, in a wooded area instead of delivering them on his Orlando, Florida, route. According to court documents, a co-worker reported to McCoy’s manager that he returned unusually early despite leaving with a large amount of mail. GPS data showed McCoy had diverted to a wooded area, where the co-worker later found scattered mail.

R A W S A L E R T S

1,904,281 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Big news for election integrity: A key Supreme Court case (Watson v. RNC) — challenging state laws allowing mail-in ballots received after Election Day (even if postmarked on time) — could finally END delayed vote counts in California and ~14 other states. No more waiting days/weeks for those ballots — like the ongoing drama in the LA Mayor race where Spencer Pratt’s lead evaporated amid late surges. Decision expected this month before the justices’ summer recess. Americans deserve results we can trust on Election Night. Timely, transparent counts build confidence. This could be a game-changer for fair elections nationwide. Should every state close the ballot box on Election Day? (Video: AI)

🚨 Big news for election integrity: A key Supreme Court case (Watson v. RNC) — challenging state laws allowing mail-in ballots received after Election Day (even if postmarked on time) — could finally END delayed vote counts in California and ~14 other states. No more waiting days/weeks for those ballots — like the ongoing drama in the LA Mayor race where Spencer Pratt’s lead evaporated amid late surges. Decision expected this month before the justices’ summer recess. Americans deserve results we can trust on Election Night. Timely, transparent counts build confidence. This could be a game-changer for fair elections nationwide. Should every state close the ballot box on Election Day? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

142,508 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump Solicitor General Dean Sauer just RUSHED to the Supreme Court, urging SCOTUS immediately overturn activist Judge Talwani's egregious ruling against USPS' final rule to secure mail-in voting in the 2026 midterms Step in and DO THE RIGHT THING! "The Postal Service’s final rule imposes only modest requirements for preparation and envelope design for federal ballot mail—requirements that fall well within its traditional authorities to impose mailing standards for particularly sensitive types of mail." "In prejudging the merits of a hypothetical rule with provisions the district court could only speculate a final rule might contain, the district court seriously overstepped the bounds of longstanding Article III standing and ripeness principles." "A stay of the district court’s injunction would allow the district court to adjudicate any such challenges to the final rule’s application, and would permit any further appellate review as necessary."

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump Solicitor General Dean Sauer just RUSHED to the Supreme Court, urging SCOTUS immediately overturn activist Judge Talwani's egregious ruling against USPS' final rule to secure mail-in voting in the 2026 midterms Step in and DO THE RIGHT THING! "The Postal Service’s final rule imposes only modest requirements for preparation and envelope design for federal ballot mail—requirements that fall well within its traditional authorities to impose mailing standards for particularly sensitive types of mail." "In prejudging the merits of a hypothetical rule with provisions the district court could only speculate a final rule might contain, the district court seriously overstepped the bounds of longstanding Article III standing and ripeness principles." "A stay of the district court’s injunction would allow the district court to adjudicate any such challenges to the final rule’s application, and would permit any further appellate review as necessary."

Eric Daugherty

104,742 views • 26 days ago

TRUMP JUST ENDED THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Is Trump finally ending mail-in voter fraud? He fired the three remaining commissioners this week, leaving the board with zero members. The EAC is the obscure little agency that sets voting machine standards and controls the federal mail voter registration form. Here is the real story behind it. For over a year Trump has pushed two basic reforms through that commission: proof of citizenship to register, and rules requiring USPS to stop blindly mailing ballots to anyone without verifying they are eligible for mail voting. The old board slow walked both. So he cleared it out. Replacements need Senate confirmation, this is not a hostile takeover, it is the president using the power the Supreme Court just confirmed he has! Now the post office piece. Trump's executive order directs USPS to track ballots and only deliver them to voters on an approved list. Courts have already blocked several parts of it, ruling the president cannot unilaterally rewrite election rules, that power sits with states and Congress. What this really means is Trump keeps applying pressure on citizenship verification and mail ballot accountability heading into the midterms. Democrats are calling it interference because tighter verification makes it harder to run up numbers through a system nobody can fully audit. This is a developing story. Nothing is more important for November than voter integrity.

TRUMP JUST ENDED THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Is Trump finally ending mail-in voter fraud? He fired the three remaining commissioners this week, leaving the board with zero members. The EAC is the obscure little agency that sets voting machine standards and controls the federal mail voter registration form. Here is the real story behind it. For over a year Trump has pushed two basic reforms through that commission: proof of citizenship to register, and rules requiring USPS to stop blindly mailing ballots to anyone without verifying they are eligible for mail voting. The old board slow walked both. So he cleared it out. Replacements need Senate confirmation, this is not a hostile takeover, it is the president using the power the Supreme Court just confirmed he has! Now the post office piece. Trump's executive order directs USPS to track ballots and only deliver them to voters on an approved list. Courts have already blocked several parts of it, ruling the president cannot unilaterally rewrite election rules, that power sits with states and Congress. What this really means is Trump keeps applying pressure on citizenship verification and mail ballot accountability heading into the midterms. Democrats are calling it interference because tighter verification makes it harder to run up numbers through a system nobody can fully audit. This is a developing story. Nothing is more important for November than voter integrity.

Bill Mitchell

90,829 views • 2 months ago

🚨 Bay Area thieves swiped a batch of mail-in ballots during California’s June 2 primary — another glaring example of why mail-in voting remains vulnerable. About 29 ballots were stolen from collection boxes or mail, later recovered from stolen mail bins at a Grocery Outlet. Officials verified and counted them this time… but what about the ones that aren’t recovered? California’s painfully slow vote counts are already under scrutiny (with LA mayor and governor races still unresolved). Mail theft happens repeatedly in the state — this isn’t an isolated incident. In-person voting with ID is the gold standard for security and trust. We need reforms to protect every vote. Is it time to tighten up the mail-in processes or remove them completely? (Video: AI)

🚨 Bay Area thieves swiped a batch of mail-in ballots during California’s June 2 primary — another glaring example of why mail-in voting remains vulnerable. About 29 ballots were stolen from collection boxes or mail, later recovered from stolen mail bins at a Grocery Outlet. Officials verified and counted them this time… but what about the ones that aren’t recovered? California’s painfully slow vote counts are already under scrutiny (with LA mayor and governor races still unresolved). Mail theft happens repeatedly in the state — this isn’t an isolated incident. In-person voting with ID is the gold standard for security and trust. We need reforms to protect every vote. Is it time to tighten up the mail-in processes or remove them completely? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

26,914 views • 3 months ago

🚨 Late-night votes just flipped the 2026 CA Governor race. As of June 5, with only 60% of ballots counted days after the election, DDHQ has called it for Becerra — projecting mail-in ballots will push him past Hilton for the top spot. Current snapshot: • Hilton: 27.18% (1,535,566 votes) • Becerra: 26.04% (1,470,970 votes) ✅ • Steyer: 20.19% Top 2 advance to November. California’s mail-in ballot system is a mess — slow counts, massive delays, and lingering doubt. This is exactly why the SAVE America Act is critical for securing our federal elections. Clean, fair, and timely voting matters. 🇺🇸 Should the federal government pass requirements for state elections such as for governor and mayor that mandate a certain time turnaround? (Video: AI)

🚨 Late-night votes just flipped the 2026 CA Governor race. As of June 5, with only 60% of ballots counted days after the election, DDHQ has called it for Becerra — projecting mail-in ballots will push him past Hilton for the top spot. Current snapshot: • Hilton: 27.18% (1,535,566 votes) • Becerra: 26.04% (1,470,970 votes) ✅ • Steyer: 20.19% Top 2 advance to November. California’s mail-in ballot system is a mess — slow counts, massive delays, and lingering doubt. This is exactly why the SAVE America Act is critical for securing our federal elections. Clean, fair, and timely voting matters. 🇺🇸 Should the federal government pass requirements for state elections such as for governor and mayor that mandate a certain time turnaround? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

137,973 views • 3 months ago

And here is, the Arizona Senate Audit of the 2020 election, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT Katie Hobbs and her co-conspirator Adrian Fontes utilizing their single greatest crime of 2020 and 2022 for the 2024 presidential elections, 25% of all 2020 mail-in-ballots equaling 420,987 ballots out of 1.9 million, CONFIRMED to have NO signature match whatsoever. And this is just in Maricopa County alone. Meaning, Rigged voter rolls + Mail in ballots + Illegal Aliens = criminal conspiracy to overthrow the United States government,

And here is, the Arizona Senate Audit of the 2020 election, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT Katie Hobbs and her co-conspirator Adrian Fontes utilizing their single greatest crime of 2020 and 2022 for the 2024 presidential elections, 25% of all 2020 mail-in-ballots equaling 420,987 ballots out of 1.9 million, CONFIRMED to have NO signature match whatsoever. And this is just in Maricopa County alone. Meaning, Rigged voter rolls + Mail in ballots + Illegal Aliens = criminal conspiracy to overthrow the United States government,

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

51,893 views • 2 years ago

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Allows Late Ballots in 30+ States — (Video: AI) How ridiculous is it that ballots arriving after Election Day can still be counted in Mississippi and roughly 30 other states? The Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling (written by Justice Barrett) lets states keep counting absentee ballots mailed by Election Day but received days later. This creates uncertainty and opens the door to questions about election integrity. Shame on SCOTUS for failing to enforce a clear, uniform Election Day deadline. Do you think ballots arriving after Election Day should be counted, or does this undermine trust in our elections?

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Allows Late Ballots in 30+ States — (Video: AI) How ridiculous is it that ballots arriving after Election Day can still be counted in Mississippi and roughly 30 other states? The Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling (written by Justice Barrett) lets states keep counting absentee ballots mailed by Election Day but received days later. This creates uncertainty and opens the door to questions about election integrity. Shame on SCOTUS for failing to enforce a clear, uniform Election Day deadline. Do you think ballots arriving after Election Day should be counted, or does this undermine trust in our elections?

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

25,070 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸 THE COURTS SCREW US AGAIN! - Why can't we just get the courts to go along with preventing mail-in ballot fraud? Let me paint the picture for you. Back in March, Trump signed an executive order on mail voting. Homeland Security would build a list of confirmed citizens eligible to vote in each state, pulled from citizenship and naturalization records. The Postal Service would then deliver ballots only to people on that list. Simple. Verify the citizen, then mail the ballot. And the courts are actually blocking this! A judge in Boston froze it on June 25 after 23 states and DC sued. Saturday the First Circuit backed her two to one, three months out from the midterms! Frustration! But let's look closer at that ruling: The appeals court never decided whether the order is actually legal. Justice argued the suit "came too early" since no agency had finalized any rules, and the panel simply said the states can sue now instead of waiting. That's a fight over timing, not the merits. A damned technicality! And a judge in Washington already went the other way on a similar challenge. This is a split heading for the Supreme Court, not a settled verdict! Once again everyone is punting! France banned mail voting back in 1975 after ballots in Corsica were cast for dead men. Why can't America just get this right? So what now? The judge said Congress never gave the President this power, and she has a point. There's already a bill for that. It's called the SAVE America Act. Once again the courts have failed us on election integrity. Am I looking at this wrong? ⬇️

🇺🇸 THE COURTS SCREW US AGAIN! - Why can't we just get the courts to go along with preventing mail-in ballot fraud? Let me paint the picture for you. Back in March, Trump signed an executive order on mail voting. Homeland Security would build a list of confirmed citizens eligible to vote in each state, pulled from citizenship and naturalization records. The Postal Service would then deliver ballots only to people on that list. Simple. Verify the citizen, then mail the ballot. And the courts are actually blocking this! A judge in Boston froze it on June 25 after 23 states and DC sued. Saturday the First Circuit backed her two to one, three months out from the midterms! Frustration! But let's look closer at that ruling: The appeals court never decided whether the order is actually legal. Justice argued the suit "came too early" since no agency had finalized any rules, and the panel simply said the states can sue now instead of waiting. That's a fight over timing, not the merits. A damned technicality! And a judge in Washington already went the other way on a similar challenge. This is a split heading for the Supreme Court, not a settled verdict! Once again everyone is punting! France banned mail voting back in 1975 after ballots in Corsica were cast for dead men. Why can't America just get this right? So what now? The judge said Congress never gave the President this power, and she has a point. There's already a bill for that. It's called the SAVE America Act. Once again the courts have failed us on election integrity. Am I looking at this wrong? ⬇️

Bill Mitchell

15,567 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: An individual was caught on tape in the Crown Heights neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York, in the act of stealing a bag containing mail. It is possible that the bag contained election ballots. Crown Heights has a large Jewish population, and many are voting for Trump.

BREAKING: An individual was caught on tape in the Crown Heights neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York, in the act of stealing a bag containing mail. It is possible that the bag contained election ballots. Crown Heights has a large Jewish population, and many are voting for Trump.

BREAKING NEWS

914,340 views • 1 year ago

South Korea's election commission finally addressed transparency concerns. Their solution: make the ballot box stand clear. Not the box. The stand. For years, South Korea's National Election Commission has faced mounting questions about election integrity: ･ Ballots stored in plastic shopping bags (2022) ･ 30-40 ballots removed from a Seoul polling station during early voting (May 2025) ･ Old 2024 general election ballots found inside 2025 presidential election boxes ･ A poll worker arrested for voting with her spouse's ID ･ The NEC's own cybersecurity was breached in a 2023 test by the National Intelligence Service ･ The NEC refused to meet with a U.S. election monitoring delegation that traveled to Korea specifically to observe ･ The NEC proposed making it a crime — punishable by up to 10 years in prison — to publicly question election results. It backed down only after a public outcry. Citizens demanded structural reform. Independent oversight. The NEC's answer for the June 3 local elections: a see-through plastic stand. The ballots themselves still go into thin bags inside. Koreans are fed up. "Is this a joke?" they're asking. Sources: Korea Herald — "Ballots and Blunders" editorial Asia Times — "Mismanaged early voting stirs voter distrust"

South Korea's election commission finally addressed transparency concerns. Their solution: make the ballot box stand clear. Not the box. The stand. For years, South Korea's National Election Commission has faced mounting questions about election integrity: ･ Ballots stored in plastic shopping bags (2022) ･ 30-40 ballots removed from a Seoul polling station during early voting (May 2025) ･ Old 2024 general election ballots found inside 2025 presidential election boxes ･ A poll worker arrested for voting with her spouse's ID ･ The NEC's own cybersecurity was breached in a 2023 test by the National Intelligence Service ･ The NEC refused to meet with a U.S. election monitoring delegation that traveled to Korea specifically to observe ･ The NEC proposed making it a crime — punishable by up to 10 years in prison — to publicly question election results. It backed down only after a public outcry. Citizens demanded structural reform. Independent oversight. The NEC's answer for the June 3 local elections: a see-through plastic stand. The ballots themselves still go into thin bags inside. Koreans are fed up. "Is this a joke?" they're asking. Sources: Korea Herald — "Ballots and Blunders" editorial Asia Times — "Mismanaged early voting stirs voter distrust"

The Monarch Report

16,176 views • 6 months ago

🚨 DeWine Vetoes Photo ID for Mail-In Voting: Traitor to Election Integrity! Why is a Republican governor blocking basic voter ID protections? Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine just vetoed legislation that would have required photo ID to cast mail-in ballots — calling it too much “burden” despite the obvious need for security. DeWine is a traitor to commonsense election reform. Every state should require voter ID to protect our votes! Shame on him for siding with open-door policies over secure elections. America demands real integrity at the ballot box — no more excuses. Do you think it’s time to hold RINOs like DeWine accountable and push voter ID nationwide? (Video: AI)

🚨 DeWine Vetoes Photo ID for Mail-In Voting: Traitor to Election Integrity! Why is a Republican governor blocking basic voter ID protections? Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine just vetoed legislation that would have required photo ID to cast mail-in ballots — calling it too much “burden” despite the obvious need for security. DeWine is a traitor to commonsense election reform. Every state should require voter ID to protect our votes! Shame on him for siding with open-door policies over secure elections. America demands real integrity at the ballot box — no more excuses. Do you think it’s time to hold RINOs like DeWine accountable and push voter ID nationwide? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

28,031 views • 2 months ago

President Trump is calling it out loud and clear. There’s BIG cheating happening in California right now. Votes are tied up, counting is deliberately slow, and massive numbers of late mail-in ballots are flooding in — all while the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles is already investigating. Democrats are trying to steal both the Governor primary and the LA Mayor primary from two strong Republican candidates. This is the same broken system we’ve seen for years: endless delays, zero transparency, and mail-in ballots that arrive days after Election Day. Why does California keep doing this? Why are the results still not finalized days later? What’s Gavin Newsom up to? (Video: AI)

President Trump is calling it out loud and clear. There’s BIG cheating happening in California right now. Votes are tied up, counting is deliberately slow, and massive numbers of late mail-in ballots are flooding in — all while the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles is already investigating. Democrats are trying to steal both the Governor primary and the LA Mayor primary from two strong Republican candidates. This is the same broken system we’ve seen for years: endless delays, zero transparency, and mail-in ballots that arrive days after Election Day. Why does California keep doing this? Why are the results still not finalized days later? What’s Gavin Newsom up to? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

64,523 views • 3 months ago

Big voter fraud: 17% of mail-in voters admitted to voting in a state where they don’t live 21% admitted to filling out someone else’s ballot 8% revealed they were bribed to vote Voter fraud is happening on a huge scale. Nuke the filibuster and pass the SAVE Act!

Big voter fraud: 17% of mail-in voters admitted to voting in a state where they don’t live 21% admitted to filling out someone else’s ballot 8% revealed they were bribed to vote Voter fraud is happening on a huge scale. Nuke the filibuster and pass the SAVE Act!

Taya

37,994 views • 8 months ago

💔 ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.

💔 ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.

Bill Mitchell

290,315 views • 2 months ago