Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Vaccine Batch Russian Roulette! Pfizer vaccine from a ‘highly lethal batch’ likely caused a man’s death 555 days later. The 47-year-old had a good medical history and was not taking medication. A peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science called the finding significant...

DawnsMission's profile picture

Dr. Dawn Michael

220,492 subscribers

28,306 views • 9 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The TGA have been caught red handed covering up deaths from the vaccine. This time it isn’t about some hard to understand biochemistry. No this is very straight forward. An autopsy was conducted on a 52 year old man after he died 7 days after taking the Pfizer vaccine. He collapsed in his home and died in front of his wife and 16 year old son. They tried unsuccessfully to revive him. The TGA never reached out to the family nor were they ever compensated. The Pathologist concluded the cause of death was Myocarditis following the Pfizer injection. Given Myocarditis is a recognised side effect of the vaccine why did the TGA not report this to the public? The answer is simple. The TGA did not want to admit they approved a dangerous medical product. This death occurred early on in the rollout when middle aged and young people were being forced to get the vaccine. Thousands of young and middle aged people have suffered serious injuries from the vaccine, not just from myocarditis but other serious conditions as well. Yet the TGA said nothing about the serious risks of this vaccine. How many other autopsy reports have they ignored. How many people have needlessly been injured because of the TGA’s deception? There is no way out for the TGA here. They don’t have the authority to override a qualified pathologist who actually examined the body. The TGA didn’t even solicit the autopsy. They don’t do it as a matter of course. Why not? How is this not criminal negligence? If the Government has any sense of decency they need to charge John Skerritt and Professor Kelly with criminal negligence now. They also need to compensate all vaccine victims and apologise to everyone they traumatised throughout the rollout. #auspol
2:19

The TGA have been caught red handed covering up deaths from the vaccine. This time it isn’t about some hard to understand biochemistry. No this is very straight forward. An autopsy was conducted on a 52 year old man after he died 7 days after taking the Pfizer vaccine. He collapsed in his home and died in front of his wife and 16 year old son. They tried unsuccessfully to revive him. The TGA never reached out to the family nor were they ever compensated. The Pathologist concluded the cause of death was Myocarditis following the Pfizer injection. Given Myocarditis is a recognised side effect of the vaccine why did the TGA not report this to the public? The answer is simple. The TGA did not want to admit they approved a dangerous medical product. This death occurred early on in the rollout when middle aged and young people were being forced to get the vaccine. Thousands of young and middle aged people have suffered serious injuries from the vaccine, not just from myocarditis but other serious conditions as well. Yet the TGA said nothing about the serious risks of this vaccine. How many other autopsy reports have they ignored. How many people have needlessly been injured because of the TGA’s deception? There is no way out for the TGA here. They don’t have the authority to override a qualified pathologist who actually examined the body. The TGA didn’t even solicit the autopsy. They don’t do it as a matter of course. Why not? How is this not criminal negligence? If the Government has any sense of decency they need to charge John Skerritt and Professor Kelly with criminal negligence now. They also need to compensate all vaccine victims and apologise to everyone they traumatised throughout the rollout. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

93,257 views • 1 year ago

"A child died in Moderna's own clinical trial [and] the company hid the death" - Alex Berenson Here's where it get's even more disturbing. A younger person in Pfizer's mRNA clinical trial, in the PLACEBO arm, was given a Moderna mRNA vaccine because of vaccine mandates. That person died weeks later [and] Pfizer included them as a Placebo AKA "Unvaccinated" covid death. So the Moderna mRNA vaccine was received in both Moderna and Pfizer clinical trials prior to their deaths.
1:47

"A child died in Moderna's own clinical trial [and] the company hid the death" - Alex Berenson Here's where it get's even more disturbing. A younger person in Pfizer's mRNA clinical trial, in the PLACEBO arm, was given a Moderna mRNA vaccine because of vaccine mandates. That person died weeks later [and] Pfizer included them as a Placebo AKA "Unvaccinated" covid death. So the Moderna mRNA vaccine was received in both Moderna and Pfizer clinical trials prior to their deaths.

Humanspective

232,088 views • 8 months ago

The “Mother Lode” of Government Data Exposes the Deadly COVID-19 Shots It turns out that the Moderna shot is “30% MORE deadly than the Pfizer shot.” How can this happen with a “safe” vaccine? Simply put, it can't. But the younger you go, the worse it gets. The explosive government data from the Czech Republic shows that 46 to 69-year-olds who received two shots of Moderna faced over a 50% HIGHER risk of death compared to those who got two shots of Pfizer within a one-year period. “Vaccines are not supposed to increase your all-cause mortality; they're supposed to reduce it.” “So even if the Pfizer shot were perfectly safe, the Moderna shot is a complete disaster. It should never increase all-cause mortality, and it increases all-cause mortality by 30% [compared to Pfizer].” Steve Kirsch
4:55

The “Mother Lode” of Government Data Exposes the Deadly COVID-19 Shots It turns out that the Moderna shot is “30% MORE deadly than the Pfizer shot.” How can this happen with a “safe” vaccine? Simply put, it can't. But the younger you go, the worse it gets. The explosive government data from the Czech Republic shows that 46 to 69-year-olds who received two shots of Moderna faced over a 50% HIGHER risk of death compared to those who got two shots of Pfizer within a one-year period. “Vaccines are not supposed to increase your all-cause mortality; they're supposed to reduce it.” “So even if the Pfizer shot were perfectly safe, the Moderna shot is a complete disaster. It should never increase all-cause mortality, and it increases all-cause mortality by 30% [compared to Pfizer].” Steve Kirsch

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

254,306 views • 2 years ago

Dr. Peter McCullough testifies in U.S. Senate and the evidence is jaw dropping. The mRNA injections should have had a black box warning for "death", and he presents the largest peer reviewed autopsy series in the World. Dr. McCullough: "When a product definitely results in death [there must be a] black box warning on the product immediately [they] still don't have the word "death" on the package insert" . Sen. Ron Johnson: "Do you have any science to back up your opinion?". Dr. McCullough: "The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author ... of all the deaths we examined, and we re-reviewed them, we had an adjudication committee, we had ways of arbitration, deciding on did the vaccine cause death ... the answer is ... of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, 73.9% of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death".
2:08

Dr. Peter McCullough testifies in U.S. Senate and the evidence is jaw dropping. The mRNA injections should have had a black box warning for "death", and he presents the largest peer reviewed autopsy series in the World. Dr. McCullough: "When a product definitely results in death [there must be a] black box warning on the product immediately [they] still don't have the word "death" on the package insert" . Sen. Ron Johnson: "Do you have any science to back up your opinion?". Dr. McCullough: "The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author ... of all the deaths we examined, and we re-reviewed them, we had an adjudication committee, we had ways of arbitration, deciding on did the vaccine cause death ... the answer is ... of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, 73.9% of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death".

Humanspective

368,901 views • 8 months ago

What’s it going to take to stop the shots. Dr Peter McCullough says it’s hard for doctors to admit they made a health mistake and face the dark truth. Unprecedented rates of injury. Heart/ neurological damage, blood clots and cancer. There is even evidence of circulating mRNA from Pfizer and spike protein in the blood. 3.2years after the shot. The greatest medical crime in modern history.
1:22

What’s it going to take to stop the shots. Dr Peter McCullough says it’s hard for doctors to admit they made a health mistake and face the dark truth. Unprecedented rates of injury. Heart/ neurological damage, blood clots and cancer. There is even evidence of circulating mRNA from Pfizer and spike protein in the blood. 3.2years after the shot. The greatest medical crime in modern history.

Kat A 🌸

16,769 views • 9 months ago

RFK Jr: "In 1989... all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared." "The CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule... so they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at... kids who got it later or didn't get it at all, and they compared these two groups." "Among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was... a relative risk of 11.35 [for a subsequent autism diagnosis]. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed... The link between smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35." "So they knew what it was, and then they had an emergency meeting that they called... and they had all of the big panjandrums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry... from NIH, CDC, FDA, the WHO, the European Medicines Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study." "Somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me... The second day they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public, and I published these things... I took a lot of heat at that point."
3:25

RFK Jr: "In 1989... all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared." "The CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule... so they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at... kids who got it later or didn't get it at all, and they compared these two groups." "Among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was... a relative risk of 11.35 [for a subsequent autism diagnosis]. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed... The link between smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35." "So they knew what it was, and then they had an emergency meeting that they called... and they had all of the big panjandrums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry... from NIH, CDC, FDA, the WHO, the European Medicines Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study." "Somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me... The second day they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public, and I published these things... I took a lot of heat at that point."

Wide Awake Media

755,907 views • 1 year ago

RFK Jr. breaks down the numbers behind the rotavirus vaccine. “In this country, the death rate from rotavirus prior to the introduction of the vaccine was about three kids a year.” “Since the introduction of the vaccine, one of the studies shows that it’s dropped to two deaths a year.” “That means you’re giving three million vaccines a year to kids and you’re saving one life.” “If any of those vaccines are causing a death, that completely cancels any benefit out of all of those vaccines.” “The first rotavirus vaccine they approved caused intussusception at such high rates it was clearly much worse than the disease.” “Even the idea that we needed it in this country was kind of crazy.” “The European countries don’t require it.”
1:42

RFK Jr. breaks down the numbers behind the rotavirus vaccine. “In this country, the death rate from rotavirus prior to the introduction of the vaccine was about three kids a year.” “Since the introduction of the vaccine, one of the studies shows that it’s dropped to two deaths a year.” “That means you’re giving three million vaccines a year to kids and you’re saving one life.” “If any of those vaccines are causing a death, that completely cancels any benefit out of all of those vaccines.” “The first rotavirus vaccine they approved caused intussusception at such high rates it was clearly much worse than the disease.” “Even the idea that we needed it in this country was kind of crazy.” “The European countries don’t require it.”

MAHA Action

105,786 views • 7 months ago

Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells Joe Rogan that a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original clinical trial data shows that their COVID mRNA vaccines *INCREASE* your risks of serious adverse events, hospitalization, and death: "In my whole career, looking at all of the drugs and knowing about many different prescribed medications, I've never seen something that when you look at the data has such poor effectiveness and unprecedented harms. In the summer of last year, in the journal Vaccine, the highest-impact medical journal for vaccines, they published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double-blinded randomized controlled trial. This is the highest quality of scientific evidence. Joseph Fraiman is an ER doctor and clinical data scientist from Louisiana. Associate editor of the BMJ, Dr. Peter Doshi. Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford. Some real eminence of integrity published this reanalysis, and what they found was this. In the trials that led to the approval of regulators worldwide, you were more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, or life-changing event than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. This mRNA vaccine should likely have never been approved for a single human in the first place, and that rate of serious adverse events is at least 1 in 800... 1 in 800 is a very, very high figure. We've pulled other vaccines for much less. The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a debilitating neurological condition called Guillan-Barre syndrome in about 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine was suspended in 1999 because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in kids in 1 of 10,000. This is at least 1 in 800. It's a no-brainer. So the question is, why have we not paused it?" Study: Dr Aseem Malhotra Joe Rogan
6:17

Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells Joe Rogan that a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original clinical trial data shows that their COVID mRNA vaccines *INCREASE* your risks of serious adverse events, hospitalization, and death: "In my whole career, looking at all of the drugs and knowing about many different prescribed medications, I've never seen something that when you look at the data has such poor effectiveness and unprecedented harms. In the summer of last year, in the journal Vaccine, the highest-impact medical journal for vaccines, they published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double-blinded randomized controlled trial. This is the highest quality of scientific evidence. Joseph Fraiman is an ER doctor and clinical data scientist from Louisiana. Associate editor of the BMJ, Dr. Peter Doshi. Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford. Some real eminence of integrity published this reanalysis, and what they found was this. In the trials that led to the approval of regulators worldwide, you were more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, or life-changing event than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. This mRNA vaccine should likely have never been approved for a single human in the first place, and that rate of serious adverse events is at least 1 in 800... 1 in 800 is a very, very high figure. We've pulled other vaccines for much less. The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a debilitating neurological condition called Guillan-Barre syndrome in about 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine was suspended in 1999 because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in kids in 1 of 10,000. This is at least 1 in 800. It's a no-brainer. So the question is, why have we not paused it?" Study: Dr Aseem Malhotra Joe Rogan

KanekoaTheGreat

2,292,761 views • 3 years ago

Dr. Peter McCullough says he had only seen TWO cases of myocarditis in his entire career before COVID. After the shots rolled out, everything changed. He says he’s now “examined thousands of patients with this problem.” “There’s 1,065 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on COVID vaccine myocarditis,” McCullough said. And the data is deeply disturbing. He pointed to a 2021 case from Washington University published in the New England Journal of Medicine. A 42-year-old man arrived at the hospital with vaccine-induced myocarditis. “The infection is ruled out,” he said. “It’s the vaccine.” Three days after his Moderna shot, the man was dead. McCullough then cited a shocking report out of Korea: a young man collapsed days after Pfizer, died within eight hours, and showed signs of a heart that had been “fried with inflammation.” A paper from Connecticut documented two teenage boys, ages 16 and 17, who died suddenly in their sleep just days after Pfizer—found lifeless by their parents. “These cases… should have gotten everyone’s attention,” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® said. “We should never have someone die after taking a vaccine that’s directly caused to the vaccine.”
2:12

Dr. Peter McCullough says he had only seen TWO cases of myocarditis in his entire career before COVID. After the shots rolled out, everything changed. He says he’s now “examined thousands of patients with this problem.” “There’s 1,065 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on COVID vaccine myocarditis,” McCullough said. And the data is deeply disturbing. He pointed to a 2021 case from Washington University published in the New England Journal of Medicine. A 42-year-old man arrived at the hospital with vaccine-induced myocarditis. “The infection is ruled out,” he said. “It’s the vaccine.” Three days after his Moderna shot, the man was dead. McCullough then cited a shocking report out of Korea: a young man collapsed days after Pfizer, died within eight hours, and showed signs of a heart that had been “fried with inflammation.” A paper from Connecticut documented two teenage boys, ages 16 and 17, who died suddenly in their sleep just days after Pfizer—found lifeless by their parents. “These cases… should have gotten everyone’s attention,” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® said. “We should never have someone die after taking a vaccine that’s directly caused to the vaccine.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

320,724 views • 1 year ago

Media Blackout: 10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You This Week #10 - The “mother lode” of government data exposes the deadly COVID-19 shots. Explosive data from the Czech Republic shows that 46-69 year olds who received two shots of Moderna faced over a 50% HIGHER risk of death compared to those who got two shots of Pfizer within a one-year period. How can this happen with a “safe” vaccine? Simply put, it can't. “It shows the government k*lls people.” Watch as our guest, Steve Kirsch (Steve Kirsch), breaks down the eye-opening data. See more revealing stories in the thread 🧵 below.
22:33

Media Blackout: 10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You This Week #10 - The “mother lode” of government data exposes the deadly COVID-19 shots. Explosive data from the Czech Republic shows that 46-69 year olds who received two shots of Moderna faced over a 50% HIGHER risk of death compared to those who got two shots of Pfizer within a one-year period. How can this happen with a “safe” vaccine? Simply put, it can't. “It shows the government k*lls people.” Watch as our guest, Steve Kirsch (Steve Kirsch), breaks down the eye-opening data. See more revealing stories in the thread 🧵 below.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,505,316 views • 2 years ago

Genomics expert Kevin Mckernan discovered SIGNIFICANT amounts of Pfizer vaccine DNA sequences in colon cancer tissue from a patient who received 4 Pfizer shots. A person fully vaccinated with 4 Pfizer doses developed aggressive colon cancer just 1 year later and died within 30 days of the diagnosis. Three biopsies 2 pre-death and one post-mortem were analyzed specifically for the vaccine sequences. The results showed significant amounts of Pfizer-derived DNA present in the tumor samples, far more than anticipated and inconsistent with trace contamination alone!
0:31

Genomics expert Kevin Mckernan discovered SIGNIFICANT amounts of Pfizer vaccine DNA sequences in colon cancer tissue from a patient who received 4 Pfizer shots. A person fully vaccinated with 4 Pfizer doses developed aggressive colon cancer just 1 year later and died within 30 days of the diagnosis. Three biopsies 2 pre-death and one post-mortem were analyzed specifically for the vaccine sequences. The results showed significant amounts of Pfizer-derived DNA present in the tumor samples, far more than anticipated and inconsistent with trace contamination alone!

Bridgett Fertig

21,166 views • 5 months ago

Pfizer CEO, Albert Bourla stated: “You vaccinate not only for yourself, you vaccinate also to protect society.” It turns out neither is true. Bourla and Pfizer profited off the lies they pushed in the media and medical industry, while knowing as a fact that the vaccine was ineffective and unsafe. Pfizer clinical trials proved long before the Covid vaccine campaign rollout that the Pfizer shots were extremely dangerous and deadly. That’s why they tried to hide the data from you for 75 years. These people lie without conscience, and when we win, they will be held accountable.
1:21

Pfizer CEO, Albert Bourla stated: “You vaccinate not only for yourself, you vaccinate also to protect society.” It turns out neither is true. Bourla and Pfizer profited off the lies they pushed in the media and medical industry, while knowing as a fact that the vaccine was ineffective and unsafe. Pfizer clinical trials proved long before the Covid vaccine campaign rollout that the Pfizer shots were extremely dangerous and deadly. That’s why they tried to hide the data from you for 75 years. These people lie without conscience, and when we win, they will be held accountable.

Died Suddenly

835,107 views • 2 years ago

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."
3:14

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Sense Receptor

35,372 views • 9 months ago

Pfizer's Own Trials Showed a 24% GREATER Likelihood of Dying in the Vaccine Group After 6 Months "For every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." • In the Pfizer clinical trials, they gave 22,000 people two COVID injections and 22,000 people fake vaccines. • Of the 44,000 in total, one person died of COVID in the vaccine group, and two people died of COVID in the placebo group. So Pfizer, with the misleading measure of relative risk reduction, called their vaccine "100% effective" because two is 100% greater than one. But from the angle of absolute risk, it took 22,000 vaccines to save just one life from COVID. • And over a 6-month period, 21 of the vaccinated people died of all causes, whereas only 17 people died in the placebo group, a 24% difference. So what was killing those people in the vaccine group? "It was cardiac arrest," attested Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "There were five cardiac arrest deaths in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group. What that means is that if you take that vaccine, you're [five times] more likely to die from a fatal cardiac arrest over the next six months than if you don't. What it also means is that for every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." Full Interview:
4:26

Pfizer's Own Trials Showed a 24% GREATER Likelihood of Dying in the Vaccine Group After 6 Months "For every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." • In the Pfizer clinical trials, they gave 22,000 people two COVID injections and 22,000 people fake vaccines. • Of the 44,000 in total, one person died of COVID in the vaccine group, and two people died of COVID in the placebo group. So Pfizer, with the misleading measure of relative risk reduction, called their vaccine "100% effective" because two is 100% greater than one. But from the angle of absolute risk, it took 22,000 vaccines to save just one life from COVID. • And over a 6-month period, 21 of the vaccinated people died of all causes, whereas only 17 people died in the placebo group, a 24% difference. So what was killing those people in the vaccine group? "It was cardiac arrest," attested Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "There were five cardiac arrest deaths in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group. What that means is that if you take that vaccine, you're [five times] more likely to die from a fatal cardiac arrest over the next six months than if you don't. What it also means is that for every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." Full Interview:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,203,402 views • 3 years ago

DISTURBING: Pfizer is now being accused of hiding DEATHS in their COVID vaccine trials. These damning new allegations come from researchers at DailyClout who analyzed Pfizer’s clinical trial data. Anesthetist Dr. Jayanthi Kunadhasan and others claim Pfizer concealed the death of a Kansas trial participant who passed away 41 days after receiving her second dose of the vaccine. The participant’s death, along with other serious adverse events, was allegedly excluded from critical FDA discussions leading to the vaccine’s Emergency Use Authorization. Additionally, it was discovered that the death reporting rate in the placebo group was 80% (4 out of 5), while it was only 33% (2 out of 6) in the vaccinated group. This discrepancy raises a critical question: Was Pfizer deliberately HIDING deaths to make its vaccine appear safer than it actually is? In a scathing rebuke, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra reacted to the allegations against Pfizer, stating: “Pfizer covered up vaccine deaths, research team alleges. This is exactly why I coined the term ‘psychopathic determinants of health.’ Evidence points towards a crime against humanity by a psychopathic entity...” Watch the video for the full report.
6:14

DISTURBING: Pfizer is now being accused of hiding DEATHS in their COVID vaccine trials. These damning new allegations come from researchers at DailyClout who analyzed Pfizer’s clinical trial data. Anesthetist Dr. Jayanthi Kunadhasan and others claim Pfizer concealed the death of a Kansas trial participant who passed away 41 days after receiving her second dose of the vaccine. The participant’s death, along with other serious adverse events, was allegedly excluded from critical FDA discussions leading to the vaccine’s Emergency Use Authorization. Additionally, it was discovered that the death reporting rate in the placebo group was 80% (4 out of 5), while it was only 33% (2 out of 6) in the vaccinated group. This discrepancy raises a critical question: Was Pfizer deliberately HIDING deaths to make its vaccine appear safer than it actually is? In a scathing rebuke, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra reacted to the allegations against Pfizer, stating: “Pfizer covered up vaccine deaths, research team alleges. This is exactly why I coined the term ‘psychopathic determinants of health.’ Evidence points towards a crime against humanity by a psychopathic entity...” Watch the video for the full report.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

236,970 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Brian Hooker says AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine was known to be deadly long before it was pulled. “We’re trying to get a paper published right now that shows that the death rate of the AstraZeneca was much higher than the death rate of the Pfizer.” “Not saying that either one of them is good, but the thing that’s really frightening is they pulled the AstraZeneca off the market in 2024, but they knew about this effect in 2022.”
0:44

Dr. Brian Hooker says AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine was known to be deadly long before it was pulled. “We’re trying to get a paper published right now that shows that the death rate of the AstraZeneca was much higher than the death rate of the Pfizer.” “Not saying that either one of them is good, but the thing that’s really frightening is they pulled the AstraZeneca off the market in 2024, but they knew about this effect in 2022.”

Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

28,032 views • 7 months ago