正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

VAERS Reports Do Not Imply "Correlation," They Indicate Causation by Proxy of Reporting Doctors report cases to VAERS after they have made the clinical determination that vaccination is cause of death. Courtesy Lila Rose Show OpenVAERS lilaroseshow McCullough Foundation

55,032 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“Dolly Parton was 80” is not a cause of death. She died after what her representatives described as a “brief battle with cancer.” What caused that cancer, when it began, and what—if anything—contributed to its progression have not been publicly established. What is established is that Dolly donated $1 million to Vanderbilt COVID-19 research that helped support development of Moderna’s vaccine, publicly received Moderna herself, sang “Vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, vaccine,” and told people reluctant to take it, “Don’t be such a chicken squat. Get out there and get your shot.” I can acknowledge all of that without claiming her vaccine caused her death. I don’t know that —and neither do you. But 80 years old does not scientifically establish that someone’s death was inevitable or that an exposure played no role. ✔️Those are questions answered by medical evidence, pathology and investigation—not a birthday. That distinction is exactly why asking questions still matters. And you, like I, should care that roughly 81% of Americans received at least one COVID-19 vaccine—and that COVID-19 vaccines generated an unprecedented number of death reports to VAERS following vaccination. VAERS reports do not, by themselves, prove causation. But a safety-surveillance signal of that magnitude should never be dismissed simply because causation has not yet been established. YET It should invite FORENSIC INVESTIGATION. That is what real science does.

Nurse Michele Talks

34,304 次观看 • 11 天前

Urgent Alert: 8,300% Spike in Colon Cancer Reports & Clinicians Report Cancers in Children - VAERS PRR 11.5 Demands Investigation A shocking analysis of the VAERS database by researcher Dr. Jessica Rose has uncovered a signal so significant it cannot be ignored. The focus: a dramatic surge in reports of colon cancer following the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. It is critical to understand this is an analysis of reported adverse events, not a confirmed diagnosis of causation. However, the signal itself is staggering: • An 8,300% increase in reports where colon cancer was listed as an adverse event in VAERS (2021-2023) compared to the previous three-year period (2018-2020). • The Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), a key pharmacovigilance metric used to detect safety signals, is 11.5. A PRR over 2 is considered a definitive signal warranting an immediate causality assessment. This is a five-alarm fire in our public health surveillance system. VAERS is designed precisely for this—to detect early warning signals that demand further investigation. This signal, combined with the recent, concerning case of a sequenced colon cancer tumor found to contain plasmid DNA, points to a potential crisis that must be proactively addressed. When leading clinicians report seeing 8, 9, and 10-year-olds with colon cancer—a previously unheard-of phenomenon—and a 13-year-old dies of metastatic pancreatic cancer, we must listen. The system is flashing red. The call to action is clear and urgent: 1. Immediately launch large-scale sequencing of tumors in individuals with sudden-onset cancers post-vaccination. 2. Formally investigate the potential causal link suggested by this overwhelming VAERS signal. The purpose of pharmacovigilance is to ask these difficult questions. Ignoring a signal of this magnitude is not an option.

Camus

59,373 次观看 • 10 个月前