Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Vals AI CEO Rayan Krishnan on why sovereign AI makes Cold War-style verification necessary: "From my very idealistic perspective, I'm surprised to see so much investment in sovereign AI." "You could probably consolidate a lot of these efforts. But it seems like that's not the world we're in or...

34,808 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

8 Yorum

Shinra profil fotoğrafı
Shinra2 gün önce

comparing ai verification to nuclear weapons inspections sounds smart until you realize you can't actually fly over and inspect an AI model. with nukes you count warheads and verify storage. with ai you can run a benchmark and the company just... shows you whatever they want you to see. shared evaluation language is fine but it doesn't solve the fundamental problem: you can't verify a black box model's true capabilities without the model owner letting you see them. this is just "please trust us we're aligned" dressed up as geopolitical necessity

Don · fireply.ai profil fotoğrafı
Don · fireply.ai2 gün önce

trading side has the same issue, everyone wants shared benchmarks until their own model is the one getting graded down

tinku profil fotoğrafı
tinku2 gün önce

One lesson I kept was to make the extra uncertainty visible. Writing the trade-off behind an earlier entry helped.

AI Mastery Guide profil fotoğrafı
AI Mastery Guide2 gün önce

sovereign AI is the new arms race fr

Gabriel Hernández profil fotoğrafı
Gabriel Hernández2 gün önce

I try to make the notification useful when it arrived. For me, recording why an alert was set at a level helps.

icefrog.◎ profil fotoğrafı
icefrog.◎2 gün önce

good luck auditing weights in a cold war mindset lol

Rosetina Degen 🚢🎒 profil fotoğrafı
Rosetina Degen 🚢🎒2 gün önce

Sovereign AI demands careful evaluation

Sridhar A profil fotoğrafı
Sridhar A2 gün önce

ai needs verification, not just trust. sovereign ai makes that impossible to ignore.

Benzer Videolar

David from USD.AI on the institutional shift happening behind CHIP, why every borrower they have is institutional, and why the AI super cycle has had no real on-chain exposure until now: "We have personally beat out other investment banks in running deals that we've signed. They're starting to view us as a threat. One call we had, she ended it early: 'I think you're a competitor, I can't talk anymore.' We're just cheaper financing, even for the bigger deals. People think we only do small deals, but we're starting to get bigger and bigger. As we attract more capital, we have to deploy in bigger deals to keep up. All of our customers are institutional. There's not a single retail borrower. These chips are expensive: The minimum we lend against is H200s, clusters of eight, that's like 300k. We're working with many of the brand names in San Francisco that are actually in the AI sector. People appreciate the positioning of Chip; it's actually engaging with the AI economy. A lot of people claim to be AI. They're in their own version of AI that they think is AI. But then there's the OpenAIs of the world. There's the Cursors of the world. Real customers, with real backing, that have cash flows. That is what people in our space want exposure to. We just haven't had a good way to do it. There's a reason you can get a loan against an airplane or a Honda Civic, but not a GPU. And GPUs are going to be worth a lot more than cars or airplanes in the future." Clip from the Modern Market interview with David | www.usd.ai

The Modern Market Show

10,397 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Sam Altman says AI leaders have done a terrible job at communicating to the public: “The, ‘Dear peasants, we will bequeath upon you these gifts of a cure for cancer and material wealth and great entertainment, and you stop complaining, and we'll make all the decisions about the future and just trust us, we'll be benevolent dictators.’ That’s not good. Not good.” “A lot of the people building AI have been saying, ‘There's a 25% chance we're going to destroy the world, and yet we're going to race ahead to do it because otherwise those bad guys will do it first.’” “Or, ‘Man, this thing is going to be really terrible, and 50% of the jobs are going to go away in the next year, and we hope you all are okay, but it seems really scary.’” “We have not, as a field, done a very good job of explaining to people what the benefits are and how the downsides can be mitigated—and we certainly have not done a good job even if people have had answers like saying, ‘There's going to be UBI, or work will be optional.’” “There's been very little discussion from people about how and why it's important that people have more power and personal freedom in the world, not less. And that matters a lot to most people.” “The ability of people to influence their own future and collectively design where society is going to go, and the autonomy that comes with that, is very important. I don't think a lot of people in the AI field… they feel it for themselves, but they don't spend much time thinking about it, reflecting on or acknowledging how important that is to other people.”

David Senra

32,300 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce