正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Van Hollen: And it's also important that people understand this case is not just about one man. It's about protecting the constitutional rights of everybody who resides in the United States of America. If you deny the constitutional rights of one man, you threaten the constitutional rights and due... show more
9 条评论

The case is about due process. nothing else.

Government officials have violated our most basic freedoms, from the freedom of speech to the right to life. Feeling unheard? You're not alone. Many agree: we need to protect these freedoms. Share your thoughts in the Defense of Freedoms in America survey. Stand for truth!

Every assault on civil rights starts the same way targeting someone “different,” while the majority stays quiet.

Van Hollen's right about the domino effect—when government strips one American's rights, it sets a precedent to dismantle everyone's. The Free Speech Protection Act (S.188) directly confronts this by barring federal overreach into online speech, ensuring bureaucrats can't strong-arm platforms to censor citizens. But let's cut deeper: every time D.C. weaponizes agencies to silence dissent or bypass due process, they're not just targeting individuals—they're eroding the structural safeguards protecting all Americans. Real accountability means dismantling the administrative state's power to pick and choose whose rights get respected. The Constitution isn't a buffet for federal overlords; it's the bedrock every citizen stands on.

The Constitutional rights of citizens are fine. Foreign gang members don’t have the same rights as citizens.

Illegals don’t have the same constitutional rights as Americans.

💙💙💙

@meggn06 It’s about a terrorist. You are pandering for a terrorist.

@ChrisVanHollen CORRECTION: "If you deny the constitutional rights of one ILLEGAL ALIEN GANG BANGER, you threaten the constitutional rights and due process for EVERY OTHER ILLEGAL ALIEN GANG BANGER else in America."
