Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Various intelligence agencies concluded that COVID likely originated from a Chinese lab based on science AND high-level intel. Kristian G. Andersen’s argument that a lab-leak is "improbable" — based on inaccurate assumptions — doesn’t hold water. John Joyce, M.D. lays out the facts⬇️

118,900 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Roland Pease
Roland Peasevor 3 Jahren

@K_G_Andersen @RepJohnJoyce If you already knew, what on Earth was the point of bringing Dr Andersen over from Scripps to the hearing?

Profilbild von Robin Ricket
Robin Ricketvor 3 Jahren

@K_G_Andersen @RepJohnJoyce "If you look at the scientific literature". There was no scientific literature to look at b4 PO was published, and subsequent literature, (save for opposing Chinese papers) was authored by nearly the same people. At least Andy has decided we are no longer conspiracy theorists.

Profilbild von racheltheone 🍊
racheltheone 🍊vor 3 Jahren

@K_G_Andersen @RepJohnJoyce Can’t believe they are still going with the bat/wet market fantasy

Profilbild von Laurence (Larry) Boorstein
Laurence (Larry) Boorsteinvor 3 Jahren

"[W]e do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible" wrote Kristian G. Andersen, Andrew Rambaut, W. Ian Lipkin, Edward C. Holmes and Robert F. Garry, Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 Nature Medicine Mar 17 2020. The conclusion of this paper was unfounded, unscientific and fraudulent. The certainty expressed in the words "any" and "plausible" is not based on science. The words are clearly intended to remove all doubt that there could have been a lab leak. The clear purpose of this effort, taking into account the authors' Feb 1 2020 meeting with Dr Fauci and Dr Collins, was to shield them, NIH and NIAID from culpability which might attach to them since they funded bat coronavirus gain of function research at Wuhan Institute of Virology and lifted the ban for EcoHealth Alliance to conduct such work Jul 11, 2016, while President Obama, who put a moratorium in place in 2014, was still in office. Contrary to insinuated denials otherwise, Andersen sent the paper before publication for vetting by Dr Fauci. The paper was published Mar 17 2020. Andersen Lab received an $8.9 million NIAID grant on May 21 2020. Kristian Andersen and Robert Garry are both PIs. Ian Lipkin has continued to received NIH grants. Edward Holmes has collaborated with WIV. Rambaut was involved with the others in discussions of a nonscientific political nature. All falsely declared no competing interests in Nature Medicine. The paper was fraudulent and did grave harm to discourse on lab leak. We have now learned that some of these same SMEs influenced the CIA and IC studies, according to reports since DNI has yet to disclose what experts were called. "Proximal Origin" is a largely successful effort to deceive the American people and the global scientific community and should be retracted. Its authors should apologize for their role in this despicable fraud.

Profilbild von dong1
dong1vor 3 Jahren

@K_G_Andersen @RepJohnJoyce Covid-19 made by CCP’s PLA 💯

Profilbild von 維生素K
維生素Kvor 3 Jahren

@K_G_Andersen @RepJohnJoyce Free Miles Guo and let him testify in the Congress Guo Has The Goods

Profilbild von NoTaxForTracksP--MAGA 🍊
NoTaxForTracksP--MAGA 🍊vor 3 Jahren

@RepJohnJoyce Anderson is a complete POS should be in jail with Fauci

Profilbild von Mia笑咪咪🍁
Mia笑咪咪🍁vor 3 Jahren

@K_G_Andersen @RepJohnJoyce Men made diseases!

Profilbild von Samson
Samsonvor 3 Jahren

@K_G_Andersen @RepJohnJoyce anyway what ever happened too that declassification that was supposed to occur? been long enough, now it should be a declassification of all labs and exactly what they have and have had. no more surprise outbreaks in the area of infectious diseases! They should openly work now.

Profilbild von CRYPTO TRUTH ~ $KAS $SOL $PEPE $TURBO $SPX $BRETT
CRYPTO TRUTH ~ $KAS $SOL $PEPE $TURBO $SPX $BRETTvor 3 Jahren

@K_G_Andersen @RepJohnJoyce I wish Trump would have taken it seriously.

Ähnliche Videos

Reposting because the AEC requires authorisation. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• The Intelligence agencies need to be held accountable for the Covid lab leak. So it turns out that Intelligence agencies knew all along that Covid was a lab leak. I’ve been the only politician in Canberra saying this and the only politician who has called for the role of Edward Holmes, a professor from the University of Sydney to be explained. People First will continue to pursue the Intelligence Agencies for their deceit. He was the one who wrote and co-authored the Lancet paper that ridiculed the idea that the virus was a lab leak. It is was my view he is an intelligence asset and an enemy of the state for covering up the role of the intelligence agencies in funding and creating the Covid virus and the government induced pandemic. And I quote from the link below: “Within hours, Vallance spoke with intelligence officials in the United Kingdom and Holmes spoke with intelligence officials in Australia.” Why would Australian intelligence officials speak with Holmes? Why was he so special? Is it because he was the deputy director of the Chinese CDC. An odd role for an Australian to have. It is incumbent upon the ASIO to ask why he lied about the origins of Covid. I have actually asked ASIO why they aren’t pursuing Holmes, and they claim it’s not their responsibility. This proves that ASIO and ASIS are in on the cover up and are now in fact accessories to the deaths of thousands of Australians. The involvement of intelligence officials regarding Covid should be bigger news than the assassination of JFK or September 11, given the number of deaths. Quote from:

Gerard Rennick

29,339 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr