Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

VaynerMedia CEO Gary Vaynerchuk says it’s a mistake to optimize everything so aggressively that you strip away the humanity of it all. He sees this in both marketing and sports. He says “one-dimensional performance marketers” lose because they get lost in metrics rather than the broader value of the... brand. He thinks sports face the same risk of becoming too sterile as AI takes over more analytical and officiating decisions: “If we get all the way to full AI robots and everything’s 100% black and white, I think the leagues are going to learn pretty quickly that we as humans need a little romance. We need a little gray.” Jordi Hays pointed to F1 drivers already wondering whether they lost because they were actually slower, or because the AI managing their car’s energy and power deployment was less dialed in.show more

TBPN

1,152,022 subscribers

27,463 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Spor

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Brad Gerstner: “AI is becoming deeply unpopular in America” “Silicon Valley is losing the battle around AI.” “Doomers are now scaring people about jobs. They think all these job cuts that are going on in America are the result of AI.” “And number two, they're seeing their electric bills go up and they think that's also the result of AI.” “I've talked with a lot of Republican Senators and House members who say they are afraid to mention the words AI because their popularity ratings go down.” “We need to get on the other side of that, because that is a losing proposition for America.” “I think both of those are false narratives, but we need to get on the other side.” “In China, they're not gonna slow down.” “So if we do an own goal here and slow down because we think somehow that this is the path to greater economic growth, it's gonna be a real problem, both national security as well as economic security.”

Brad Gerstner: “AI is becoming deeply unpopular in America” “Silicon Valley is losing the battle around AI.” “Doomers are now scaring people about jobs. They think all these job cuts that are going on in America are the result of AI.” “And number two, they're seeing their electric bills go up and they think that's also the result of AI.” “I've talked with a lot of Republican Senators and House members who say they are afraid to mention the words AI because their popularity ratings go down.” “We need to get on the other side of that, because that is a losing proposition for America.” “I think both of those are false narratives, but we need to get on the other side.” “In China, they're not gonna slow down.” “So if we do an own goal here and slow down because we think somehow that this is the path to greater economic growth, it's gonna be a real problem, both national security as well as economic security.”

The All-In Podcast

2,074,815 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Buttigieg: The founders didn’t set up a democracy because they just thought it was academically interesting. They did it because they saw that if one person has too much power, daily life gets worse. That’s why I’m a little allergic to this idea that we shouldn’t worry about our democracy because we need to talk about things that are a little more immediate. They go together. We should talk about all of them at once. The reason why you paid $1,000 more per household last year in tariffs is because we have a president who doesn’t think he’s accountable to the American people and didn’t think he had to follow the law. These things are connected.

Buttigieg: The founders didn’t set up a democracy because they just thought it was academically interesting. They did it because they saw that if one person has too much power, daily life gets worse. That’s why I’m a little allergic to this idea that we shouldn’t worry about our democracy because we need to talk about things that are a little more immediate. They go together. We should talk about all of them at once. The reason why you paid $1,000 more per household last year in tariffs is because we have a president who doesn’t think he’s accountable to the American people and didn’t think he had to follow the law. These things are connected.

Acyn

226,094 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

$WATCH: Joe Lonsdale on Elon, Trump & the future of DOGE: "I'm obviously supportive of everything Elon did there. I was a little frustrated with the comment he made earlier this week, which was that, oh, there’s a tidal wave of AI coming and therefore we don’t need to worry about cleaning [up] government. I think that’s actually the wrong conceptual model..." Andrew Ross Sorkin: We often talk about DOGE. I know you’re an old pal of Elon’s. What do you think about some of the comments that Elon has made about DOGE recently? And just the talk about fractured relationships, the fractured relationship with the Trump Administration right now? Joe Lonsdale: Listen, there’s been a lot of mess there the last couple of weeks. We still have a lot of our smartest friends working at DOGE. They’re still cutting billions of dollars of nonsense. I’m really glad they’re there. I don’t want them to give it up. I'm obviously supportive of everything Elon overall did there. I was a little frustrated with the comment he made earlier this week, which was that, oh, there’s a tidal wave of AI coming. And therefore we don’t need to worry about cleaning the beach of the government. I think that’s actually the wrong conceptual model. The correct conceptual model, Andrew, is that AI is coming to our society, and it’s really important that AI ends up lifting everyone up. And the way it’s going to do that is through western civilization... so we have this civilization that’s based on the Enlightenment, based on property rights. It’s Judeo-Christian values. It’s classical virtues, it’s a functional civilization. We don’t want to give that all up for AI. We want to go in, we want to make healthcare and education work better, but we have to do it through the way it works. Andrew: What did you think he was saying there? Because here he was for a very long time saying, we need to actually make government more efficient. And then there seemed to be a little bit of a switch to say, actually, maybe not. Was that a lesson that he learned? Just sort of suffering in Washington in the swamp, or do you think that was really a view that, you know, I really is going to change everything, and basically everyone was wasting their time? Joe: I think making government work better is really, really hard. It takes a lot of persistence. It takes a lot of time. On the margin, his time might be better spent building these amazing AI companies, and I think that’s completely legit. But I don’t think we should discount the importance of fixing government, especially because of AI, because if we want to have everyone do better in health care and education and government itself, these things need to be functional. They need to work with it. They need to block crony capitalism. That means functional government. So you need both.$

WATCH: Joe Lonsdale on Elon, Trump & the future of DOGE: "I'm obviously supportive of everything Elon did there. I was a little frustrated with the comment he made earlier this week, which was that, oh, there’s a tidal wave of AI coming and therefore we don’t need to worry about cleaning [up] government. I think that’s actually the wrong conceptual model..." Andrew Ross Sorkin: We often talk about DOGE. I know you’re an old pal of Elon’s. What do you think about some of the comments that Elon has made about DOGE recently? And just the talk about fractured relationships, the fractured relationship with the Trump Administration right now? Joe Lonsdale: Listen, there’s been a lot of mess there the last couple of weeks. We still have a lot of our smartest friends working at DOGE. They’re still cutting billions of dollars of nonsense. I’m really glad they’re there. I don’t want them to give it up. I'm obviously supportive of everything Elon overall did there. I was a little frustrated with the comment he made earlier this week, which was that, oh, there’s a tidal wave of AI coming. And therefore we don’t need to worry about cleaning the beach of the government. I think that’s actually the wrong conceptual model. The correct conceptual model, Andrew, is that AI is coming to our society, and it’s really important that AI ends up lifting everyone up. And the way it’s going to do that is through western civilization... so we have this civilization that’s based on the Enlightenment, based on property rights. It’s Judeo-Christian values. It’s classical virtues, it’s a functional civilization. We don’t want to give that all up for AI. We want to go in, we want to make healthcare and education work better, but we have to do it through the way it works. Andrew: What did you think he was saying there? Because here he was for a very long time saying, we need to actually make government more efficient. And then there seemed to be a little bit of a switch to say, actually, maybe not. Was that a lesson that he learned? Just sort of suffering in Washington in the swamp, or do you think that was really a view that, you know, I really is going to change everything, and basically everyone was wasting their time? Joe: I think making government work better is really, really hard. It takes a lot of persistence. It takes a lot of time. On the margin, his time might be better spent building these amazing AI companies, and I think that’s completely legit. But I don’t think we should discount the importance of fixing government, especially because of AI, because if we want to have everyone do better in health care and education and government itself, these things need to be functional. They need to work with it. They need to block crony capitalism. That means functional government. So you need both.

American Optimist

14,037 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Zendaya says Tom Holland was recognized as Spider-Man after they were stopped by the police while rushing to spin class “Tom and I were rushing to a spin class with my mother.” “I wasn’t going to do the spin class, he was going to do it, because I don’t do that.” “We were going a little fast because we were running late.” “They recognized that he was Spider-Man.” “We were fine, we got a warning, and everything was okay.”

Zendaya says Tom Holland was recognized as Spider-Man after they were stopped by the police while rushing to spin class “Tom and I were rushing to a spin class with my mother.” “I wasn’t going to do the spin class, he was going to do it, because I don’t do that.” “We were going a little fast because we were running late.” “They recognized that he was Spider-Man.” “We were fine, we got a warning, and everything was okay.”

Lin

415,191 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

Anthropic's Sholto Douglas describes the concept of a software-only singularity: "It's one where the models are far better at digital tasks than they are at physical ones. And so we see rapid change in the digital world with models, and relatively little change in the physical world. So information and software changes dramatically, and this ends up having some pretty weird effects." "It means that maybe like the drivers of what have been the last couple decades of progress in the economy turn around." "And I think we'll see that flow on into the physical world but at a delay. So you get much better at doing chip design. You get much better at training AI models. AI models get a lot faster. Chips get a lot better. The general economy gets a lot more efficient because the sort of information and message parsing that is much of the rest of the economy ends up becoming much more efficient." "But at the same time you don't yet have robots providing limitless physical abundance. Science probably progresses really fast up to the degree that you need interaction with labs or larger particle colliders or something like this. And then you go, 'Okay well I need to build the robots.'"

Anthropic's Sholto Douglas describes the concept of a software-only singularity: "It's one where the models are far better at digital tasks than they are at physical ones. And so we see rapid change in the digital world with models, and relatively little change in the physical world. So information and software changes dramatically, and this ends up having some pretty weird effects." "It means that maybe like the drivers of what have been the last couple decades of progress in the economy turn around." "And I think we'll see that flow on into the physical world but at a delay. So you get much better at doing chip design. You get much better at training AI models. AI models get a lot faster. Chips get a lot better. The general economy gets a lot more efficient because the sort of information and message parsing that is much of the rest of the economy ends up becoming much more efficient." "But at the same time you don't yet have robots providing limitless physical abundance. Science probably progresses really fast up to the degree that you need interaction with labs or larger particle colliders or something like this. And then you go, 'Okay well I need to build the robots.'"

TBPN

208,090 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

In this moment of great tragedy, we know that all Americans, and certainly the families who lost loved ones, deserve answers. As they conduct their investigation, I am certain the NTSB will get to the bottom of what happened. We need a transparent investigation, and we need as much as can be shared to be shared as quickly as possible.

In this moment of great tragedy, we know that all Americans, and certainly the families who lost loved ones, deserve answers. As they conduct their investigation, I am certain the NTSB will get to the bottom of what happened. We need a transparent investigation, and we need as much as can be shared to be shared as quickly as possible.

Mayor Muriel Bowser

12,586 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

In Ag…… let’s be honest we know so very little, we just hope to capture a bit of knowledge each opportunity we get. We should learn from one another not cry about someone’s ideas because they are different then what you learned or were taught. History teaches us a lot, but it doesn’t mean you can’t move forward, it’s a constant cycle of learning. And no one learns without others! It’s a team game that we are all in together. The guy that says I can’t trust that guy as he sells that seed or that fertilizer or that foliar is going to see rough times. As learning is opening your eyes and ears to ideas, and adding them to your library full of knowledge from your own experiences. That’s how something improves. It’s not the same thing every year and it’s not changing everything all at once. It’s bringing ideas and practices together to make it all work and bridge the gap.

In Ag…… let’s be honest we know so very little, we just hope to capture a bit of knowledge each opportunity we get. We should learn from one another not cry about someone’s ideas because they are different then what you learned or were taught. History teaches us a lot, but it doesn’t mean you can’t move forward, it’s a constant cycle of learning. And no one learns without others! It’s a team game that we are all in together. The guy that says I can’t trust that guy as he sells that seed or that fertilizer or that foliar is going to see rough times. As learning is opening your eyes and ears to ideas, and adding them to your library full of knowledge from your own experiences. That’s how something improves. It’s not the same thing every year and it’s not changing everything all at once. It’s bringing ideas and practices together to make it all work and bridge the gap.

Jason Schley

13,556 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

At the time of this speech, the main takeaway from Dan Campbell was “I don’t care if you have one ass cheek and three toes, I will beat your ass.” Looking back, there’s a much deeper meaning here. The coaches, the front office and the players all knew what he meant and they all bought in. The culture of this Lions team was built off speeches just like this. Possibly built off this exact one. “We’ll go a little longer. We’ll push a little harder. We’ll think a little deeper and little sharper.” “Normally I’m 100% but I only need 85% to beat you.” (Think of Ragnow on that Vea block) “…just gotta get a hold of them though. If you just get a hold of them and start dragging their ass out to the deep dark abyss…you can drown ‘em. And that’s what we have to be. That’s who we have to be. Because that’s our domain. Because we will tread water as long as it takes to fucking bury you. We’ll go as long as it takes because we can and we choose to.” Everything Campbell said in this speech is the team the Lions have become. #AllGrit

At the time of this speech, the main takeaway from Dan Campbell was “I don’t care if you have one ass cheek and three toes, I will beat your ass.” Looking back, there’s a much deeper meaning here. The coaches, the front office and the players all knew what he meant and they all bought in. The culture of this Lions team was built off speeches just like this. Possibly built off this exact one. “We’ll go a little longer. We’ll push a little harder. We’ll think a little deeper and little sharper.” “Normally I’m 100% but I only need 85% to beat you.” (Think of Ragnow on that Vea block) “…just gotta get a hold of them though. If you just get a hold of them and start dragging their ass out to the deep dark abyss…you can drown ‘em. And that’s what we have to be. That’s who we have to be. Because that’s our domain. Because we will tread water as long as it takes to fucking bury you. We’ll go as long as it takes because we can and we choose to.” Everything Campbell said in this speech is the team the Lions have become. #AllGrit

Russell Brown

1,029,851 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Rick Caruso (Rick J. Caruso) explains why he included curbs and gutters at The Grove as intentional design choices: "They're there because your eye picks it up." "If we had built The Grove as a flat plaza without curbs and gutters, you wouldn't read it in your mind as a street." "The rhythm of the trees, the rhythm of the streetlights. We study all of that stuff." "We actually had a landscape architect on The Grove who threatened to quit because he wasn't going to design curbs and gutters. He said, 'People are going to trip.' I said, 'People don't trip walking around cities. Why are they going to trip here?'"

Rick Caruso (Rick J. Caruso) explains why he included curbs and gutters at The Grove as intentional design choices: "They're there because your eye picks it up." "If we had built The Grove as a flat plaza without curbs and gutters, you wouldn't read it in your mind as a street." "The rhythm of the trees, the rhythm of the streetlights. We study all of that stuff." "We actually had a landscape architect on The Grove who threatened to quit because he wasn't going to design curbs and gutters. He said, 'People are going to trip.' I said, 'People don't trip walking around cities. Why are they going to trip here?'"

TBPN

74,771 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Buttigieg: And my word of warning to my own political party is that we would make a terrible mistake if we thought that our job was to just take power somehow and then put everything back the way it was. That’s not what we’re here to do. We’re not out to go around and just find all the little bits and pieces of everything that they smashed and tape it together and say, “Here you go, I give you the world as it looked in 2023.” That’s not going to work. It’s not what we need. So much has changed, and the truth is they are destroying things right and left. They’re destroying a lot of good, important things. They’re destroying some useless things too, because they’re destroying everything. So now we get a chance to put things together on different terms.

Buttigieg: And my word of warning to my own political party is that we would make a terrible mistake if we thought that our job was to just take power somehow and then put everything back the way it was. That’s not what we’re here to do. We’re not out to go around and just find all the little bits and pieces of everything that they smashed and tape it together and say, “Here you go, I give you the world as it looked in 2023.” That’s not going to work. It’s not what we need. So much has changed, and the truth is they are destroying things right and left. They’re destroying a lot of good, important things. They’re destroying some useless things too, because they’re destroying everything. So now we get a chance to put things together on different terms.

Acyn

631,023 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Author and investor Morgan Housel doesn’t think people are reading less because we have shorter attention spans. He just thinks we have way less tolerance for bad writing. “It’s easy to say that people don’t have attention spans these days. They want short-form video, and they just want to flip through it, and that’s it.” “And it’s like, no. The biggest podcasts in the world are three-hour conversations that people listen to all the way through.” “So I think it’s not that people don’t have attention spans. They don’t have a lot of tolerance for BS in the way that they used to.” "30 years ago, people would slog through a bad book because they had nothing else to do that day. Whereas now, if you start a book and it’s bad, you’re like, 'I’ve got 20 other things competing for my attention. I’m going to go there.'"

Author and investor Morgan Housel doesn’t think people are reading less because we have shorter attention spans. He just thinks we have way less tolerance for bad writing. “It’s easy to say that people don’t have attention spans these days. They want short-form video, and they just want to flip through it, and that’s it.” “And it’s like, no. The biggest podcasts in the world are three-hour conversations that people listen to all the way through.” “So I think it’s not that people don’t have attention spans. They don’t have a lot of tolerance for BS in the way that they used to.” "30 years ago, people would slog through a bad book because they had nothing else to do that day. Whereas now, if you start a book and it’s bad, you’re like, 'I’ve got 20 other things competing for my attention. I’m going to go there.'"

TBPN

33,706 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Jordi: I worry that we'll have a lost generation of people who have let it be ingrained in their heads that nothing is worth trying, because AI will eventually eat every opportunity. "There's this toxic idea that AGI is just going to do everything, and then we're all going to retire." "Because from everything we're seeing, it's going to be a group of talented people using AI tools to solve all the most pressing problems we have."

Jordi: I worry that we'll have a lost generation of people who have let it be ingrained in their heads that nothing is worth trying, because AI will eventually eat every opportunity. "There's this toxic idea that AGI is just going to do everything, and then we're all going to retire." "Because from everything we're seeing, it's going to be a group of talented people using AI tools to solve all the most pressing problems we have."

TBPN

26,977 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Ken Paxton reveals that he is already working hard to win the support of Republican Senators who supported John Cornyn in the primary. Paxton says he will be on Capitol Hill this week to meet with them in order to UNITE the Republican Party to win in Texas. PAXTON: “Look, I’m very optimistic about getting their support.” “I’ve already been in contact with Senator Thune, Senator Barrasso, Senator cotton, Senator Scott from south Carolina.” “So I think they’ve all pledged their support along with other U.S. Republican Senators, and I’m going to meet with several of them this week.” “I think they understand how important Texas is not just because of the majority, but also because we are Texas.” “We haven’t lost a statewide a race since 1994, and this isn’t the time to do it.” “We need to unite, and we need to fight together and I’m willing to do that, and I certainly think they are too.” Attorney General Ken Paxton

Ken Paxton reveals that he is already working hard to win the support of Republican Senators who supported John Cornyn in the primary. Paxton says he will be on Capitol Hill this week to meet with them in order to UNITE the Republican Party to win in Texas. PAXTON: “Look, I’m very optimistic about getting their support.” “I’ve already been in contact with Senator Thune, Senator Barrasso, Senator cotton, Senator Scott from south Carolina.” “So I think they’ve all pledged their support along with other U.S. Republican Senators, and I’m going to meet with several of them this week.” “I think they understand how important Texas is not just because of the majority, but also because we are Texas.” “We haven’t lost a statewide a race since 1994, and this isn’t the time to do it.” “We need to unite, and we need to fight together and I’m willing to do that, and I certainly think they are too.” Attorney General Ken Paxton

Overton

12,020 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says the reason they've become the global leader in AI is because they built full alignment with their customers instead of "masturbating and selling tokens" like other AI companies: "We actually want the customers to succeed." "We are the only company I know of, and definitely the only company at scale, that actually is paid as a derivative of value creation for the enterprises we work with and serve." "We do not have any other way of actually getting paid." "Every other company wants to outsource the risk of failure to the client because they know it's gonna fail." "Because to succeed, you would need a full stack from compute all the way up to model training, and you'd have to absorb the risk of that not working, which means having some kind of business intuition about what the value is to the customer, a willingness to say no, FDEs that aren't just masturbating and selling tokens." "They sell tokens. The FDEs, some of them are ex-Palantirians—they're just selling tokens. Just like some of you guys had a social life in high school that was virtual, except for you're ripping off the client."

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says the reason they've become the global leader in AI is because they built full alignment with their customers instead of "masturbating and selling tokens" like other AI companies: "We actually want the customers to succeed." "We are the only company I know of, and definitely the only company at scale, that actually is paid as a derivative of value creation for the enterprises we work with and serve." "We do not have any other way of actually getting paid." "Every other company wants to outsource the risk of failure to the client because they know it's gonna fail." "Because to succeed, you would need a full stack from compute all the way up to model training, and you'd have to absorb the risk of that not working, which means having some kind of business intuition about what the value is to the customer, a willingness to say no, FDEs that aren't just masturbating and selling tokens." "They sell tokens. The FDEs, some of them are ex-Palantirians—they're just selling tokens. Just like some of you guys had a social life in high school that was virtual, except for you're ripping off the client."

Jawwwn

18,484 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

Factory CEO Matan Grinberg says all companies go through three phases of AI adoption: "Phase Zero is reluctance to adopt because developers have had the same workflows for the last 20 years and they might not want to change it." "Phase One is throw the kitchen sink and use as much AI as possible. Whatever you do, just change your workflows." "Phase Two is that people are now adopting the tech, they're proving that they can change their behavior, and use these tools. But now we need to make sure we're actually doing it efficiently and effectively. Uber and Meta are examples of this." "Yes, you'll overspend in Phase One, but the point is to get to Phase Two where then you're actually really efficient on a per-token basis, moving the needle for the business and delivering software faster."

Factory CEO Matan Grinberg says all companies go through three phases of AI adoption: "Phase Zero is reluctance to adopt because developers have had the same workflows for the last 20 years and they might not want to change it." "Phase One is throw the kitchen sink and use as much AI as possible. Whatever you do, just change your workflows." "Phase Two is that people are now adopting the tech, they're proving that they can change their behavior, and use these tools. But now we need to make sure we're actually doing it efficiently and effectively. Uber and Meta are examples of this." "Yes, you'll overspend in Phase One, but the point is to get to Phase Two where then you're actually really efficient on a per-token basis, moving the needle for the business and delivering software faster."

TBPN

25,747 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Zapier CEO Wade Foster says individuals have become more productive with AI tools, but that it's not clear if companies as a whole are also becoming more productive: "Across Zapier, 100% of our employees are using AI daily. People are individually more productive. But if you were to ask me, 'Is the company more productive, institutionally are we more productive?' It's a lot harder to say yes to that." "This feels like the next thing that everybody's working on: How do we actually accelerate the institution? This gets harder because you actually have to rethink how the company works." "To give you an example, we've gone from a world where code was expensive to now code is cheap. In the world where code was expensive, you had all these processes upfront to talk to customers, to align on roadmaps, to figure out what the right thing to build was, because if you chose the wrong thing, that was a really expensive mistake." "But when code is cheap, you can get rid of all that stuff. And that takes redesigning jobs or rethinking the human where the human actually exists in the first place."

Zapier CEO Wade Foster says individuals have become more productive with AI tools, but that it's not clear if companies as a whole are also becoming more productive: "Across Zapier, 100% of our employees are using AI daily. People are individually more productive. But if you were to ask me, 'Is the company more productive, institutionally are we more productive?' It's a lot harder to say yes to that." "This feels like the next thing that everybody's working on: How do we actually accelerate the institution? This gets harder because you actually have to rethink how the company works." "To give you an example, we've gone from a world where code was expensive to now code is cheap. In the world where code was expensive, you had all these processes upfront to talk to customers, to align on roadmaps, to figure out what the right thing to build was, because if you chose the wrong thing, that was a really expensive mistake." "But when code is cheap, you can get rid of all that stuff. And that takes redesigning jobs or rethinking the human where the human actually exists in the first place."

TBPN

15,382 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

AOC: I imagine that Donald Trump is going to deny the results of any election that he loses because he can’t really bear the thought—the idea that he actually lost. And so I think we’ve already seen others since 2020, like Kari Lake in Arizona and many others, try to say, “Well, if I lost, it must be because it was made up.” And that’s just not the case. When you lose fair and square, you have to understand that that’s what happened, and we have to respect the will of voters. Just like when Democrats lose, you have to respect the will of voters as well.

AOC: I imagine that Donald Trump is going to deny the results of any election that he loses because he can’t really bear the thought—the idea that he actually lost. And so I think we’ve already seen others since 2020, like Kari Lake in Arizona and many others, try to say, “Well, if I lost, it must be because it was made up.” And that’s just not the case. When you lose fair and square, you have to understand that that’s what happened, and we have to respect the will of voters. Just like when Democrats lose, you have to respect the will of voters as well.

Acyn

510,187 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Jaylen Brown says he used the NBA Players Association instead of hiring an agent for the NBA Draft because they're paid to help players “When I entered the draft, I didn't have an agent. I'm probably the highest picked selected ever that didn't enter with an agent. When I was evaluating, I went through the whole process and sat with a bunch of people, and what they was offering I ain't really need. It was kind of already slotted, so I leaned on the union a lot more” “A lot of the agents came and was like, ‘Yeah, we'll move you to L.A. We'll get you a trainer, put some money in your pocket,’ and I was like, ‘For what? Do I gotta give the money back?’ They was like, ‘Nah, but standard agent fee is 4%.’ I'm starting to do the math, and a house, car, and all that, whatever he was offering, is a lot less than what 4% would have been” “Long story short, the math wasn't mathing for me. I ended up being the third pick. I think because I came in like that, a lot of people, I think it was the agents, they tried to slander my name a little bit, put it in the media that he's too this, he's too that. Ended up backfiring. It all worked out in the end” “With the union, we pay dues. All the players in the NBA pay dues. We all pay like $10,000 out of our salary that goes to hiring lawyers, hiring staff, CEO, everything that you need to lead a company that works for us. So all of that is our resources that we all pay for, that we agree to. Once I learned that, I just started using it” “I'm talking about you can get private investigations done. They give referrals for financial advisors. All type of stuff. Foundation wise, health insurance, whatever you need. They have a liaison that's paid to make sure that you get it done. So I put it on their desk like, ‘I need you to get this done.’ And they do because that's their job”

Jaylen Brown says he used the NBA Players Association instead of hiring an agent for the NBA Draft because they're paid to help players “When I entered the draft, I didn't have an agent. I'm probably the highest picked selected ever that didn't enter with an agent. When I was evaluating, I went through the whole process and sat with a bunch of people, and what they was offering I ain't really need. It was kind of already slotted, so I leaned on the union a lot more” “A lot of the agents came and was like, ‘Yeah, we'll move you to L.A. We'll get you a trainer, put some money in your pocket,’ and I was like, ‘For what? Do I gotta give the money back?’ They was like, ‘Nah, but standard agent fee is 4%.’ I'm starting to do the math, and a house, car, and all that, whatever he was offering, is a lot less than what 4% would have been” “Long story short, the math wasn't mathing for me. I ended up being the third pick. I think because I came in like that, a lot of people, I think it was the agents, they tried to slander my name a little bit, put it in the media that he's too this, he's too that. Ended up backfiring. It all worked out in the end” “With the union, we pay dues. All the players in the NBA pay dues. We all pay like $10,000 out of our salary that goes to hiring lawyers, hiring staff, CEO, everything that you need to lead a company that works for us. So all of that is our resources that we all pay for, that we agree to. Once I learned that, I just started using it” “I'm talking about you can get private investigations done. They give referrals for financial advisors. All type of stuff. Foundation wise, health insurance, whatever you need. They have a liaison that's paid to make sure that you get it done. So I put it on their desk like, ‘I need you to get this done.’ And they do because that's their job”

dank

8,191,171 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce