Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 Veer or Maafi-Veer? CHITRA: Gandhi–Nehru–Savarkar, complementary or contradictory? ASHOK PANDEY 🔥: In religious polarization, Savarkar stood closer to Jinnah. SANGEET 🤡: Jail conditions were different… ASHOK 🎯: Many chose the gallows, not mercy petitions.

45,996 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚩 Why Savarkar was called veer - why leftists hate him: And you’ll get to know why our education system doesn’t teach much about him. Let’s see the leftist questions: 1) Why did Savarkar write 5 mercy petitions to 🇬🇧 British? Truth ☠: He spent almost 11yrs in Jail, tortured daily. Petitions were strategic, so he could continue fight outside. Britishers 🥊👊: “He didn’t surrender - He’s just outsmarted the empire” 2) Why Savarkar didn’t join freedom fight after his release in 1924? Truth ☠: Because he rejected useless non-violence. Since he believed in armed resistance like Shivaji & Subhash chandra Bose. 🚩 He wanted Hindus to be military strong 💪 🔥 3) Why did he excludes Muslims & Christians with hindutva definition? ( he wanted it belongs to who see India as bith fatherland & holy land) Truth ☠: He said -> “ A Hindu may be atheist - but still a Hindu” He actually promoted inter caste unity & rational thinking. 4) Wasn’t he linked to Gandhi assassination since Godse followed him. Truth ☠: Court aquitted him due to lack of evidence. His ideologies - 100yrs ahead of his time: -> 🚩He opposed caste discrimination & blind religious rituals -> 🚩He opposed appeasing minorities (against to Muslim league) -> 🚩Every Hindu must see bharat as fatherland and holy land. -> 🚩Against to Two nation theory & wanted akhand Bharat 🇮🇳 -> 🚩He urged Indians to learn true history -> Hindu resistance (shivaji, prithviraj, rana sanga, maharana pratap) Spread this, Every Indian must know about this unsung hero & greatest freedom fighter. 🫡

Dharmic-Wave 🚩

14,450 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Hatred Dressed as Mythology RSS Exposed Again 🎯 This chilling 1945 cartoon from the magazine Agrani (edited by Nathuram Godse) speaks volumes. Mahatma Gandhi is depicted as the ten-headed Ravana — with the other heads representing towering freedom fighters like Nehru, Patel, Subhash Chandra Bose, Maulana Azad, and more. Aiming the arrows? V.D. Savarkar and Shyama Prasad Mookerjee. The magazine itself was launched with financial help from Savarkar, who reportedly gave Godse a significant sum (around ₹15,000 at the time — a huge amount then, could mean upto 15Crore worth as on date) to start it. How could a school teacher amass so much money? This wasn’t subtle satire. It was a public display of deep animosity towards Gandhi and the inclusive idea of India he represented — years before the tragic assassination. The other 9 faces of the Ravana in this illustration are all our Nation’s revered Freedom Fighters, Pandit Nehru, Subash Chandra Bose, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar, Sardar Patel, Maulana Azad … This goes to show that Savarkar, Golwarkar, Godse, SP Mukherji were all allies with the British and resisted the collective Indian Fight For Freedom against the British. They never stood up with India to throw out the Feudal Brits. The RSS, BJP, VHP, all hate Mahatma Gandhi and they bowing their head today to him is nothing but a facade. Otherwise M@di wouldn’t have renamed MNREGA, NITI AYOG and so many other progressive initiatives begun by our former leaders. History has judged who stood for unity and who sowed division. The cartoon may be old, but the ideology it reflects still echoes today. Do listen to Rakhkumar Bhati (Samajwadi Party) who has explained the RSS-BJP deceit, treachery and treason in detail. This also shows why Modi hates English and why he is meticulously trying to eliminate the Macaulay Education policy. India shall live to regret trusting RSS and BJP and letting BJP remain in power. It has and shall mean doom for India. @rajumarnhatisp #Gandhi #Savarkar #AgraniMagazine #IndianHistory #FreedomStruggle

Pragnya Gupta

21,087 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

CRITICISM IS A CRIME! And Telangana Is A Different Country?? Bairi Ashok is a normal RTC Bus driver. He was passing by a dharna by the Congress leaders near Jagityal-Dharmapuri, Telangana. Ashok enquired about the traffic. They told it was a dharna about petrol & diesel prices hike. Ashok then advised that these leaders should first take care of the paddy procurement. Because farmers who toil day & night for six months are dropping dead sitting in sweltering hot sun in front of their produce for days together. He requested the government to start the procurement process immediately. Due to extreme weather conditions and sudden rains, these food grains are also getting washed away. Ashok, as a normal human being expressed his opinion. He was grief stricken looking at the plight of poor farmers everyday. So! How does the government reward him?? He was told today to “go back home and he doesn’t have a job anymore”..!! Bairi Ashok is shocked. He didn’t commit a crime, he didn’t abuse anyone, he didn’t resort to corruption, he just felt bad for the farmers and shared his thoughts. When Chief Minister Revanth Reddy came to power, he promised seventh guarantee that is not in their election schemes- seventh guarantee of liberty, the freedom of speech and expression! Telangana CMO Revanth Reddy under which rule was Ashok suspended? The suspension letter clearly says the action was taken for “criticising the Congress government “!!! Is there a special constitution in Telangana? Is Article 19, Freedom of Speech and Expression a defunct fundamental right in Telangana? Is Telangana part of India? Or is this another nation? Rahul Gandhi Priyanka Gandhi Vadra ప్రజాపాలన అని దండోరా వేశారు? ప్రగతి భవన్ కంచెలు కూల్చేశామని ప్రగల్భాలు పలికారు??

Revathi

47,865 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Deep gratitude to three people who chose humanity first 🤍 🔥 Felix (GoliathFan1952) · ✨ William Menaker (Will 🦥 Menaker) · 🤍 Eyup Lovely (Eyup Lovely) When many looked away, you refused to be silent. When destruction covered everything, you chose life. Because of you, clean drinking water was delivered to children and families in the heart of destruction — in neighborhoods shattered by missiles, among rubble, smoke, and homes turned to dust. This was not aid delivered to safe places. This was water carried into zones of death. Children drank where rockets fell. Mothers filled bottles where walls once stood. Hands trembled — not from fear alone, but from thirst finally eased 💧 Your voices broke through the siege. Your actions crossed ruins and fire. What you did was not charity — it was rescue under fire. 🚨 WATER DISTRIBUTED IN GAZA 🚨 In Gaza today, water is not flowing from taps. It is hand-carried through destruction. We distributed drinking water in areas devastated by airstrikes and missiles — where streets are broken, where homes are gone, where children sleep beside ruins. A child stood for hours under the sun — not asking for food, not asking for toys — only asking for water 💧 And today… the water reached them. This is not a story of tomorrow. This is not a promise. This is happening now. Small bodies. Dry throats. Cracked lips. And finally — a sip of life. In Gaza, water is no longer a basic right 💧 It is the thin line between survival and death. Between a mother holding her child alive — or holding their memory in silence. 🚨 THE NEED IS STILL URGENT 🚨 Destruction is everywhere. Thirst is everywhere. 👉 Donate now. Do not stop. 💧 Because delivering water in Gaza = delivering life If water reaches them today, a child survives the night. If it doesn’t — the rubble will witness another goodbye.

Muhmmed Project𓂆 🇵🇸

116,190 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

What is ailing secularist leftist polluted young generation of the Bharat? Part 1 1. Going to the Mandir daily for seeking the blessings is a choice not a way of life. 🌄 Our ancestors wrote a great deal about the Nitya karma and the philosophy of the life in Darshan Shastra in way more better terms than so called westernized motivational writers and speakers. Have you ever hear of Bhagvat Gita? 2. Wearing dhoti kurta like traditional dresses or putting up a Tilak on the forehead is a choice not way of life. 🌄 Did you see how a particular religion makes it a street war if you question their tent like head to toe dresses.? That's radical right but then that speaks for their belief. Can you show such belief for your own religion and its values? 3. Reading and speaking Sanskrit is way too hard compared to English speaking or speaking any other dialect we are born with. 🌄 When you go to the UK they speak English, you go to Rusdia they speak Russian, you go to South Korea they speak Korean, you go to Japan they speak Japanese, you go France they speak French. You happily learn French or German or English to be at home in those countries..!! What about your own home..?? The Land of Bharat..!! What you do when you see a foreigner in India? You go to that person and say..Hello, Welcome to India. 4. Our constitution is secular and we shall not believe in Sanatan or hindutva. It is radical. Caste is a hindu concept brought of Manu smriti. 🌄 Have you seen the original script of the Constitution.? Have ever heard about the person who coined the term SECULAR? Do you know the level of appropriation heaped on the Hindus by using Article 28 and article 29 of the Constitution? You might have read Marx and Angels. You might be fascinated by the Sigmund Frued. But did you ever took pain yo understand Manu smriti? Who coined the term "caste".? Did you ever try to find how many sects/castes are those religions who always hide behind the rancor of the "Minority Card". 5. As an grown up person I can choose my life partner irrespective of religion and I don't believe in this ultra hyper concept of Love Jihad. 🌄 Did you ever see halala in your Hindu family? Did you ever heard of a hindu boy marrying his first cousin sister and vice versa.? Did you ever see your dad convincing your mom that he can have 3 more wives and its OK? 6. As a Hindu we must let other religions exercise their rights and way of religion practices. 🌄 Have you ever seen any hindu pooja/ yajna in the middle of the road? Have you ever seen any hindu priest going to the neighbourhood of other religion and start telling them "Let's convert to the Hinduism"? Have you ever seen any hindu neighborhood pelting stones on any religious procession? 7. Gandhi is the father of nation and Chacha Nehru is a maker of India. 🌄 History we read in our school textbooks is an appropriated version heaped on us by the Nehru promised leftist academics. Have you ever heard of anyone in you family sleeping naked with his own daughter in law or grand daughter for full proofing his brahmacharya? Never, right? Did you explored on it? Did you ever check how AIIMS Delhi was created? How ISRO was created? How we lost 1962 war against China? How atomic programme of India was delayed by decades? 8. Bhagat Singh, Chandra Shekhar Azad, Neta Ji and so many other revolutionaries were just a part of a long struggle for the independence which was possible because of Indian national Congress and Gandhi's Ahinsa Stayagraha. 🌄 Have you ever seen Gandhi or Nehru beaten black and blue by britishers? Have you ever explored what happened to the mother of Chandrashekhar Azad? What happened to the family of Netaji? What happened to the family of Bhagat Singh? What happened to the families of countless revolutionaries who were hanged by the britishers? Now tell me What happened to the families of Nehru and Gandhi? .

The Story Teller

96,459 просмотров • 2 лет назад

UPDATE from Calcutta Club - The speakers for the motion, particularly Mani Shankar Iyer and Mahua Moitra, stayed true to form. A heady cocktail of arrogance, selective history and personal diatribes, ensuring their time was spent more on sermonising than substantiating. Ms Moitra, in a moment of intellectual self goal, attempted to paint Hinduism as comfortably non vegetarian and Hindutva as rigidly vegetarian. A theory that collapsed under its own weight when she invoked Gandhi’s Hinduism (Gandhi being a staunch vegetarian), while conveniently forgetting that Savarkar, the most vocal proponent of Hindutva, was an atheist and a meat eater. The House, rather sportingly, even recalled the delightful anecdote of Savarkar cooking prawns when Gandhi visited him in London. Reality, as usual, proved inconvenient. ashutosh, sadly, seemed to be debating a motion that only existed in his head. A complete disconnect from both subject and audience, marred by weak articulation and arguments that struggled to locate either logic or coherence. Dr. Ruchika Sharma started with promise but quickly wandered into an entirely different TED Talk on ancient Hindu history and Sanatan Dharma. The actual motion was left abandoned at the altar, while we were treated to an oddly abrasive, patronising monologue delivered with the self certainty of the only “real historian” in the room. Fortunately, KunalSARKAR played the role of the reality check, puncturing the self importance with humour and restoring some order. His intervention was a reminder that good moderation is not just about keeping time, but about keeping egos in check. From the against the motion camp, Swapan Dasgupta was in sublime form. Witty, precise, historically grounded and linguistically commanding. His ten minutes were a masterclass in how control over language shapes narratives, and how Anglophile discomfort with the word Hindutva is often rooted more in prejudice than principle. Agnimitra Paul BJP, from whom much was expected, unfortunately and prematurely, converted her slot into a miniature election rally to the wrong audience. The motion was nowhere to be found, and even the ever patient moderator KunalSARKAR had to humorously rein her in, a moment that drew more applause than her argument. Then entered Sai Deepak J, the speaker many were waiting for. Unapologetic, unburdened by political correctness and razor-sharp. He dismantled the proponents arguments with clinical ease, to thunderous approval from the “guspetias” in the audience (a term Ms Moitra used rather generously for the alleged Hindutvawadis who had infiltrated Calcutta’s elite circle, and one that earned her a solid round of boos). His arguments were crisp, historically honest, and refreshingly free from cherry picking. Finally, Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi arrived to loud cheers, only to leave many disappointed. Instead of engaging the motion, he drifted into grievance-listing and rhetorical digressions, turning what should have been a strong finish into a missed opportunity. Though the judges declared the debate a draw (perhaps in the fear and the pressures mounted by the elite administrators), the overwhelming show of hands against the motion was a rude awakening for Calcutta’s pseudo-liberal elite. It signalled that the tide is turning, and that their once-comfortable narratives are now being dismantled with ease by voices they never thought belonged to the “intelligentsia”

Adit

110,770 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Rahul Gandhi's high-handed attitude toward working journalists is deeply troubling and warrants serious concern. At an election rally in Amaravati, Maharashtra, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, made sweeping remarks about working journalists, accusing them of being beholden to the ruling regime and labelling them as "slaves of their owners." While cloaked in concern for the plight of journalists, his comments carried a tone of condescension that warrants closer scrutiny. Has Mr Gandhi ever reflected on the root causes of the challenges faced by working journalists in India and the state of journalism as a whole? The precarious conditions of journalists today stem largely from rampant contractualisation, driven in part by the neoliberal policies introduced by the Congress-led government in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Until then, journalists had fought for and secured significant rights, including unionization and better working conditions. Contractualisation, however, allowed monopoly media houses to sack journalists at will, weakening unions and leaving journalists vulnerable. If Mr. Gandhi truly wishes to address the plight of journalists, perhaps he should redirect his critique toward the media owners and the structural issues within the industry. The ever-present threat of dismissal, combined with an oversupply of unemployed and underemployed journalists, makes it unrealistic to expect working journalists to rebel against the system at great personal risk. While we acknowledge the immense challenges posed by the current government’s authoritarian tendencies toward the media, it is equally concerning to witness Mr Gandhi’s repeated targeting of journalists. His rhetoric raises legitimate concerns about how his party might approach the press if it were to return to power. If Prime Minister Narendra Modi is rightly criticised for avoiding open press conferences, Mr Gandhi’s recurrent mockery and derision of journalists also deserve rebuke. The Mumbai Press Club has consistently stood against the violation of journalists’ rights, whether by ruling parties, media owners, or other forces. We, therefore, view the high-handed approach of the Leader of the Opposition toward working journalists as a matter of serious concern. Constructive dialogue and accountability, not dismissive remarks, are what the media—and democracy—deserve.

Mumbai Press Club

84,078 просмотров • 1 год назад