Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Vennala Gaddar Probably Doesn’t Know! She didn’t see properly and must have spoken says Andhra Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan. Vennala Gaddar, daughter of balladeer Gaddar responded strongly to Pawan Kalyan’s comments on Telangana. “We fought for our state, we didn’t buy it. It is our state that... show more
19,219 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
![Doocy: “And are you guys just not — since February, testing President Biden for Parkinson's or for dementia because, if he gets a bad result, it's all over that day?” KJP: “Again, as I've said many times before, The President had a fulsome, comprehensive — uh — what we said — what we shared with you was comprehensive but he's had a full — uh — physical. We've — we've shown the results of those this past three years.We showed it just four months ago, and it is in line with what we have done, similar to President Obama, similar to George W. Bush. We are committed to continue to be transparent. We are committed to continue to show the results of those — of those physicals and look, it's the President's medical team that makes a decision. We are not — with all due respect, you're not a doctor. I'm not a doctor. It is the President's medical unit that makes a decision on what the President needs.” Doocy: “Not doctor —” KJP: “Yeah.” Doocy: “— just play one on TV. But I know that —” KJP: “That’s scary.” Doocy: “— that is scary, but I know that especially as adults get into their 80s, health conditions can pop up more than just once a year when he's getting his physical. I think if my wife saw me on TV misspeaking or saying the wrong thing or —” KJP: “Yeah.” Doocy: “— seeing a change in my appearance, she would probably say, let's go to a doctor just to make sure that you are okay. You have a family. You have an important job. Why doesn't anybody in the President's family urge him just to go to get checked out to say the coast is clear?” KJP: “Okay. So, just to step back just a little bit, because I think you weren’t in the briefing room last week. I don't want to go backwards, but just to share a little bit about that night. The president said it was a bad night. He talked about it. He had a cold, right? He talked about his schedule — right — of being abroad. And so, we’ve spoke [sic] what that night was like for him. And we understand what the American people saw, what you all saw, we've spoken to that. And I also would say and I think you know this, Peter, if — you’ve — you've covered a couple administration at this point — administrations at this point, that the President, every president has a White House medical that is with him 24/7 — that is available to him 24/7 — that is unlike any other American, right? That is not the norm. That is uncommon. Just down on the other side of the colonnade is where the medical unit and I did share — and — that the President checks in while he's exercising with his doctor on — a couple of times a week. And so, he has that — he has something that most majority of Americans — all Americans — I would probably argue — don't have, which is a full medical unit that is with him at all times and he gets a full, full, full physical, annual physical we share with all of you and that is very different — a very different than an everyday American who, sometimes, they're lucky if they can go get a physical. They have to get into a car. They have to take public transportation. The President has, again, a medical unit that's with here at the White House and travels with him.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1810776462804336782/ext_tw_video_thumb/1810776192078983168/pu/img/Dr50_J92xKvgMHUf.jpg)
![Question from journalist: “France says that they will support Palestinian statehood in the next short while. You’ve described that as a reward for Hamas here. Other countries like Australia are also walking down this path. Not quite there yet. How much of this is a reward for Hamas, and how much of it is actually countries like those who have repeatedly said Israel does have a right to defend itself, but are now struggling to stomach what they’re saying you and your military are doing in Gaza?” -- Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Response: “Well, first of all, those who say that Israel has a right to defend itself are also saying, but don’t exercise that right. When we do what any country would do, faced with this genocidal terrorist organization that has performed the worst attack on Jews since the Holocaust, I think we’re actually applying force judiciously. And they know it. They know what they would do if they’re right next to Melbourne or right next to Sydney. You had this horrific attacks. I think you would do it, at least what we’re doing, probably─ maybe not as efficiently and as precisely as we’re doing it. We’ve lost quite a few soldiers in that effort. But, that’s the first thing. I think that, the second thing you ask is a Palestinian state. Well, the assumption, the prevailing assumption, in this, is that the problem that we have with the Palestinians is the absence of a Palestinian state. And if they were given a Palestinian state, they would stop the efforts to destroy the Jewish state. But the Palestinians were offered a state many times, including in the partition resolution, and they turned it down. They were offered statehood by my predecessors with lavish, lavish concessions. They turned it down. Because the Palestinians are not about creating a state; they’re about destroying a state. That’s why they opposed the Jewish national movement to create a state. It’s called Zionism. They opposed it before the inception of the Jewish state, and they’ve opposed it since. They’ve opposed it when they had Judea and Samaria, the West Bank and Gaza in their whole. They didn’t say, let’s start, let’s create a state there. They didn’t say that, because, again, their goal is the destruction of a state. It defies imagination or understanding how intelligent people around the world, okay, including seasoned diplomats, government leaders and respected journalists, fall for this absurdity. It’s so easy to verify, you know. And look at the PA. Okay. Look at the Palestinian National movement today is divided between two forces: The Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria, and Hamas in Gaza. Okay. Hamas in Gaza had a de facto state. It had a state and it used it to launch a war of terror against Israel, because their doctrine, that is, that the destruction of Israel should proceed with forceful and direct military and terrorist moves. That’s what they did on October 7th. That’s what they’ll do again if we don’t destroy them. The Palestinian Authority, on the other hand, says, ‘No. First, Israel has to be reduced to indefensible boundaries. You’ve got to get them out. With the ICC, with the UN, with the Security Council resolutions: Drive them to indefensible boundaries and then deliver the blow, because Israel is too strong in its present configuration.’ These discussions are open. They’re held. Anybody─ you don’t need Israeli Intel for it, believe me. You can just scour the web, you’ll find it. Okay. So they have no difference about the goal. That’s why the Palestinian children in Judea and Samaria and the Palestinian children, that is, the Palestinian children under the PA, and the Palestinian children under Hamas are educated with exactly the same textbooks. That’s why the PA calls its public squares against mass killers of Jews. That’s why they have pay for slay: The more Jews you murder, the more you get paid. Or your family gets paid. I mean, so that that’s the crux of the problem. The real reason that this conflict persists is not because of the absence of a Palestinian state, but the persistent Palestinian refusal to recognize a Jewish state in any boundary. Now, when you give them a Palestinian state, when they haven’t abandoned the goal of destroying the Jewish state, all you’re doing is you’re making, you’re bringing the next war closer. Again, Hamas had a state. You just brought the war closer. And if you did the same thing in Judea and Samaria, right above Tel Aviv, enveloping Jerusalem, some say cutting Jerusalem into two, that’s all that’s gonna happen. You’re going to have the radicals again take it over, Iran, take it over, and start a state from improved boundaries, start a war with improved boundaries. That’s not going to happen. I think the solution to this problem is that the Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves in the places where they live, and none of the powers to threaten Israel. They should obviously reform their whole education system. They should reform their whole historical outlook and say, ‘All right, you know, we accept that Israel is here to stay,’ not as a fact, as a physical or geographic fact, but as a fact of historical equity. You know, if they want to live here, next to us, they have to stop seeking our destruction. And to give them an independent state, with all the trimmings, is to invite a future war and a certain war. And that’s something that, today the Israeli public forcefully opposes. Before the war, by the way, it was about, you know, a third [for a Palestinian state] / two thirds [against], in the overall population. Probably 60 [against a Palestinian state]/40 for a state. Or even more, against [a state] in the Jewish population. But now it’s changed more dramatically [to more against a state]. I mean, we had a vote in the Knesset, a few months ago, about the possibility, you know, of having a Palestinian state. And the result was 99 to 9. 99 to 9. And that covers a very broad spectrum. And today most of the Jewish public is committed – is against the Palestinian state for the simple reason that they know it won’t bring peace, but it’ll bring war. To have uh, European countries, and Australia, march into that rabbit hole – just like that, fall right into it ─ and buy this canard is disappointing. And I think it’s actually shameful. But it’s not going to change our position. Again, we will not commit national suicide to get a good op-ed for two minutes. We won’t do that. Thank you very much.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1957515064229106124/amplify_video_thumb/1957514974198214656/img/Zts-FU_PZPeKjrD0.jpg)
![🔥 Confirmation: UAPDA to be Reintroduced 🔥 Rounds: "I've been informed that Senator Schumer would like to partner once again, and that we would offer it again this year in the [NDAA]. I have no objections to submitting the legislation in its current form, but I would also work with my House counterparts to allay any concerns." Ross Coulthart: "Are we going to see a reintroduction of the UAP Disclosure Act? Are you going to try and get it through the Congress once again this year?" Senator Mike Rounds: "I've been informed that Senator Schumer would like to partner once again, and that we would offer it again this year in the National Defense Authorization Act, which we'll begin working on here in the next few weeks. So the answer is yes, we intend to move forward once again. "And we modeled this originally after the Kennedy assassination reports and the committee that was established to release the timely information that we had available. But to make a decision on when to release information based on its not only its need, but its appropriateness. We thought the same type of approach that successfully released a huge amount of information on the Kennedy assassination would be the appropriate way to look at any information that was available on the issue of what was at that time, UFOs." Ross: "Perhaps the most significant thing about that original legislation was that, as well as it being an incredible 64 pages of proposed UAP disclosure legislation, it was an incredibly powerful piece of legislation, if it had gone through in the form, in the original form that was proposed. It mentioned Non-Human Intelligence - NHI - 24 times. It's a very bold statement - isn't it - by the Senate and by the Congress, of intention. You seem to be suggesting there, that there is a there, there to be found." Rounds: "You know, our intent was to make sure that there wasn't an assumption by folks who were following it that we were trying to hide anything. And our goal was to say, look, if there is any of this, which, you know, a lot of folks out there have questioned whether or not, after all these years, there was contact that we had with entities, intelligence that was not of this Earth and so forth, we just thought, rather than beating around the bush, let's just say, 'Look, if there's any of that out there, then let's disclose it. Let's make that available, or at least collect it. And then at some point, based upon a commission's review of it, to determine any national security concerns, to be able to share that information at the appropriate time.' It was not put in there because of any evidence that I had, or that I believe Senator Schumer had, that would suggest that we had a smoking gun. But rather, let's have clarity. Let's lay this thing out and make sure that the American public would know, that if there was such information that existed, we were directing that it be preserved and then it be delivered for appropriate persons and for review by this select committee." Ross: "Senator, would you like to see the original legislation passed in its original, proposed form? Is that a possibility, or are you looking at changing that legislation in any way from what was originally proposed, I think in July 2023?" Rounds:"I have no objections to submitting the legislation in its current form, but I would also work with my House counterparts to allay any concerns that they may have. And once again, look, my background on this is working on the Senate Intel Committee, the Intelligence Committee, but also on the Armed Services Committee. And I can tell you that that we do a lot of research, and we've got advanced projects going on all the time,. And what we didn't want to have happen was a demand for exposure on weapon-systems capabilities and so forth, that that might otherwise be found or reported out or disclosed in an inappropriate way. "Many people have talked now about the development of stealth, and I think now there's more and more discussion on the fact that there were some plans out there that allowed some of these stealth weapons to be unidentified for an extended period of time, on purpose. And the reason for it was, is because for national-defense purposes. In those particular cases where we have items out there that might very well be ours, we may very well not wanna be able...we may not wanna disclose that information, and it's appropriate to keep it private. The same if we know of other weapon systems by other countries. We may not want to disclose it, but we wanted a place where it could at least be collected, and an independent organization could look at it and be able to disclose that which was not subject to. National Defense concerns." (We're not asking for OUR secret tech to be revealed and I'm tired of hearing that. However, what if there's a technological breakthrough that will make our lives better on this planet and be better for the environment? Then what?)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1939845495062733204/amplify_video_thumb/1939839912032776192/img/G_PKYQ9sHXu0AAfF.jpg)
