Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Versuchsträger Scheitellafette VT-S1 during testing, WTS-Koblenz, 1978. The vehicle is not in its full intended configuration, which is perfectly normal for a running mock-up based on the MARDER chassis. As early as 1977, Thyssen-Henschel began developing a concept with externally mounted armament (Scheitellafette) on the MARDER chassis. The MARDER...

AndreiBtvt's profile picture

Andrei_bt

20,287 subscribers

51,409 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологииАвто и транспорт
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The video shows the trials of the VT-1-1, a turretless tank with 2 x 105 mm guns, firing on the move at the Putlos training ground in 1976. The casemate (turretless) tank, designed for combat while moving, was introduced in Germany in the mid-1970s as a twin-gun casemate tank (the Soviet term for a "turretless tank"). For practical firing tests in the "target pass" mode, two prototypes were built in the mid-1970s. The first prototype, VT 1-1, was armed with two 105 mm guns, while the second, VT 1-2, was equipped with two 120 mm smoothbore guns. Additionally, the VT 1-2 featured a functioning autoloader behind one of the guns, with a firing rate of 10 rounds per minute. The vehicles were developed as part of the KPz 3 or Leopard 3 project. In both prototypes, the main guns were semi-fixed (with aiming and stabilization only in elevation). The chassis solutions were derived from the KPz 70 (MBT 70) program, with the running gear shortened by one road wheel (five road wheels per side). The vehicles weighed 36.8 and 43.5 tons, respectively, with a chassis rotation speed of 60 degrees per second. To achieve high maneuverability on rough terrain, 12-cylinder diesel engines from the MB 873 series with enhanced power were used, equipped with four turbochargers: 2000 hp for VT 1-1 and 2200 hp for VT 1-2. This provided an impressive power-to-weight ratio of 54 and 50 hp/ton, respectively, with acceleration to 55 km/h in 11 seconds, though only in a temporary "turbo" mode, as the standard power was 1600 hp. The accuracy of firing with two guns was unmatched by single-gun tanks, as confirmed by the tests. However, due to the novel combat approach, this revolutionary tank concept was rejected by the customer after trials in favor of the conventionally designed Leopard 2. In essence, although the project was developed as the Leopard 3, a tank for the future, it was, in reality, a parallel project and a potential competitor to the Leopard 2. Achieving the firepower, protection, and mobility of the Leopard 3 within reasonable weight limits was impossible with a conventional layout. At the same time, a significant tactical drawback of the casemate concept (including twin-gun casemate vehicles) is the linkage between the direction of fire and the direction of movement, which in many cases could complicate unit and formation control (according to German experts in the 1970s). Moreover, the VT 1-1 and VT 1-2 can hardly be considered balanced vehicles—they could have been simpler. The vehicles' mobility was exaggerated, with the main engine, transmission, auxiliary engine, batteries, and other systems occupying two-thirds of the vehicle's length. Pros and Cons of VT 1-1 and VT 1-2: Considering the key challenges, the twin-gun casemate concept can be evaluated as follows: Pros: Compact design due to a small internal volume. Two guns provide high firepower and hit probability. Cons: The weight advantage of the casemate design is largely offset by the integration of a second gun. Fire control alone results in high complexity, leading to increased maintenance costs and overall expenses. In 1975/76, five Gefechtsfeldversuchträger (GVT, combat test platforms) were developed and built for further mobility and concept trials. These were smaller than the VT 1-1 and VT 1-2, weighing 30 tons. The GVT 01-05 were equipped only with mock-up guns and laser firing simulators (TALLISSI) and telemetry systems, built using chassis components from the Leopard 1. The GVTs were used at the IABG facility in Lichtenau and the tank training school in Munster to test the twin-gun turretless tank concept in realistic exercise conditions, which is why five vehicles were built. However, the Leopard 2 was already in production, and tank crews showed little enthusiasm for this unconventional vehicle requiring a new approach.
0:20

The video shows the trials of the VT-1-1, a turretless tank with 2 x 105 mm guns, firing on the move at the Putlos training ground in 1976. The casemate (turretless) tank, designed for combat while moving, was introduced in Germany in the mid-1970s as a twin-gun casemate tank (the Soviet term for a "turretless tank"). For practical firing tests in the "target pass" mode, two prototypes were built in the mid-1970s. The first prototype, VT 1-1, was armed with two 105 mm guns, while the second, VT 1-2, was equipped with two 120 mm smoothbore guns. Additionally, the VT 1-2 featured a functioning autoloader behind one of the guns, with a firing rate of 10 rounds per minute. The vehicles were developed as part of the KPz 3 or Leopard 3 project. In both prototypes, the main guns were semi-fixed (with aiming and stabilization only in elevation). The chassis solutions were derived from the KPz 70 (MBT 70) program, with the running gear shortened by one road wheel (five road wheels per side). The vehicles weighed 36.8 and 43.5 tons, respectively, with a chassis rotation speed of 60 degrees per second. To achieve high maneuverability on rough terrain, 12-cylinder diesel engines from the MB 873 series with enhanced power were used, equipped with four turbochargers: 2000 hp for VT 1-1 and 2200 hp for VT 1-2. This provided an impressive power-to-weight ratio of 54 and 50 hp/ton, respectively, with acceleration to 55 km/h in 11 seconds, though only in a temporary "turbo" mode, as the standard power was 1600 hp. The accuracy of firing with two guns was unmatched by single-gun tanks, as confirmed by the tests. However, due to the novel combat approach, this revolutionary tank concept was rejected by the customer after trials in favor of the conventionally designed Leopard 2. In essence, although the project was developed as the Leopard 3, a tank for the future, it was, in reality, a parallel project and a potential competitor to the Leopard 2. Achieving the firepower, protection, and mobility of the Leopard 3 within reasonable weight limits was impossible with a conventional layout. At the same time, a significant tactical drawback of the casemate concept (including twin-gun casemate vehicles) is the linkage between the direction of fire and the direction of movement, which in many cases could complicate unit and formation control (according to German experts in the 1970s). Moreover, the VT 1-1 and VT 1-2 can hardly be considered balanced vehicles—they could have been simpler. The vehicles' mobility was exaggerated, with the main engine, transmission, auxiliary engine, batteries, and other systems occupying two-thirds of the vehicle's length. Pros and Cons of VT 1-1 and VT 1-2: Considering the key challenges, the twin-gun casemate concept can be evaluated as follows: Pros: Compact design due to a small internal volume. Two guns provide high firepower and hit probability. Cons: The weight advantage of the casemate design is largely offset by the integration of a second gun. Fire control alone results in high complexity, leading to increased maintenance costs and overall expenses. In 1975/76, five Gefechtsfeldversuchträger (GVT, combat test platforms) were developed and built for further mobility and concept trials. These were smaller than the VT 1-1 and VT 1-2, weighing 30 tons. The GVT 01-05 were equipped only with mock-up guns and laser firing simulators (TALLISSI) and telemetry systems, built using chassis components from the Leopard 1. The GVTs were used at the IABG facility in Lichtenau and the tank training school in Munster to test the twin-gun turretless tank concept in realistic exercise conditions, which is why five vehicles were built. However, the Leopard 2 was already in production, and tank crews showed little enthusiasm for this unconventional vehicle requiring a new approach.

Andrei_bt

81,636 просмотров • 1 год назад

‼️BREAKING: Prosecution Shows Rifle Photos In Tyler Robinson Hearing — But There’s A Major Problem 👀 In Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, prosecutors just showed photos of the rifle they claim was used to assassinate Charlie Kirk. They displayed: The exact location where the gun was allegedly found The rifle wrapped in a towel (how they say it was discovered) The same rifle out of the towel and in a box Here’s the critical issue: This is a sporterized Mauser .30-06 with a low-mounted scope. If the rifle still has its original military-style wing safety, it would be nearly impossible to operate with that scope mounted. The safety wing would have to flip up and over the bolt — directly into the scope. For this rifle to actually fire with the current scope setup, it would need an aftermarket low-profile safety that clears the optic. So the question is simple: Looking at these photos the prosecution just presented… does this rifle still have the original military wing safety, or has it been modified with a low-profile aftermarket safety? If it still has the original safety, this gun — as configured — could not have been fired with that scope in place. This is a major problem for the prosecution’s case. Watch the clip and look closely at the safety on the rifle. What do you see? More on this coming. Follow for the technical breakdowns they’re not addressing in court. CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman
2:16

‼️BREAKING: Prosecution Shows Rifle Photos In Tyler Robinson Hearing — But There’s A Major Problem 👀 In Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, prosecutors just showed photos of the rifle they claim was used to assassinate Charlie Kirk. They displayed: The exact location where the gun was allegedly found The rifle wrapped in a towel (how they say it was discovered) The same rifle out of the towel and in a box Here’s the critical issue: This is a sporterized Mauser .30-06 with a low-mounted scope. If the rifle still has its original military-style wing safety, it would be nearly impossible to operate with that scope mounted. The safety wing would have to flip up and over the bolt — directly into the scope. For this rifle to actually fire with the current scope setup, it would need an aftermarket low-profile safety that clears the optic. So the question is simple: Looking at these photos the prosecution just presented… does this rifle still have the original military wing safety, or has it been modified with a low-profile aftermarket safety? If it still has the original safety, this gun — as configured — could not have been fired with that scope in place. This is a major problem for the prosecution’s case. Watch the clip and look closely at the safety on the rifle. What do you see? More on this coming. Follow for the technical breakdowns they’re not addressing in court. CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

730,569 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Opposed by conservative horse-artillery advocates, the Holt 2½-ton Artillery Tractor Model 1918 was an experimental light tracked vehicle built by Holt Manufacturing (Caterpillar’s predecessor) to mechanize US Army field artillery and replace horses. the Ordnance Department turned one into a self-propelled gun by extending the chassis side plates to mount the 3-inch M1916 field gun on trunnions and adding rear outriggers for firing stability on its short, tall frame. The concept never entered production—the M1916 gun was itself discarded in favor of the French 75 mm M1897, and post-Armistice budget cuts killed the project.
0:26

Opposed by conservative horse-artillery advocates, the Holt 2½-ton Artillery Tractor Model 1918 was an experimental light tracked vehicle built by Holt Manufacturing (Caterpillar’s predecessor) to mechanize US Army field artillery and replace horses. the Ordnance Department turned one into a self-propelled gun by extending the chassis side plates to mount the 3-inch M1916 field gun on trunnions and adding rear outriggers for firing stability on its short, tall frame. The concept never entered production—the M1916 gun was itself discarded in favor of the French 75 mm M1897, and post-Armistice budget cuts killed the project.

Aviation Archive - Tim Farmer

29,822 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Both Joe Rogan and Ian Carroll believe there were 2 JFK shooters and neither was the driver. JFK's head famously goes 'back and to the left' with the top of his head exploding upwards. How could the driver have been the shooter if the driver was also on the left? Even if the driver is holding a gun, he was a secret service agent whose job it was to pull his gun if shots are fired. The driver is misdirection. The truth is right in front of us, but it will be very difficult for people to accept. The first shot came from a mechanism built into the car fired from the passenger seat which struck JFK in the neck. The second shot came from Jackie who fired from below with a small custom gun she carried in her purse. She wasn't trying to collect JFK's brains but trying to hand off the gun to the agent running behind the car. Watch it carefully. She leans in as she pulls the trigger. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
3:12

Both Joe Rogan and Ian Carroll believe there were 2 JFK shooters and neither was the driver. JFK's head famously goes 'back and to the left' with the top of his head exploding upwards. How could the driver have been the shooter if the driver was also on the left? Even if the driver is holding a gun, he was a secret service agent whose job it was to pull his gun if shots are fired. The driver is misdirection. The truth is right in front of us, but it will be very difficult for people to accept. The first shot came from a mechanism built into the car fired from the passenger seat which struck JFK in the neck. The second shot came from Jackie who fired from below with a small custom gun she carried in her purse. She wasn't trying to collect JFK's brains but trying to hand off the gun to the agent running behind the car. Watch it carefully. She leans in as she pulls the trigger. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.

Kab

76,649 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇬🇧 Lotus 102C Isuzu V12 Test In 1991, Team Lotus secretly tested an experimental V12 Formula One engine developed by Isuzu. This project, which remains a fascinating "what-if" in motorsport history, centered on the Isuzu P799WE engine. The Engine (P799WE): A 75-degree, naturally aspirated 3.5-liter V12 designed by a small, four-person team at Isuzu. It was impressively powerful, producing between 640 and 765 bhp depending on the stage of development, which was competitive with the top engines of the era. The Chassis (Lotus 102C): To test the engine, Lotus modified its 102B chassis to accommodate the V12, renaming the resulting car the Lotus 102C. The Test: The car underwent system checks at the Hethel test track in late July and early August 1991. The primary on-track evaluation took place at Silverstone in early August 1991, with drivers Johnny Herbert and Mika Häkkinen conducting the tests. Performance: During the Silverstone test, the car was reportedly around six seconds off the pace of Ayrton Senna’s McLaren-Honda. Several factors contributed to this: the engine lacked an alternator (requiring heavy onboard batteries), the chassis was not optimized for the new V12, and the car was not running on specialized racing fuel or tires. Reliability: Despite the gap in lap times, the engine proved remarkably reliable during testing and was considered easy to work with by the Lotus mechanics. Economic Collapse: The project coincided with the collapse of the Japanese asset price bubble. This economic instability, combined with Isuzu witnessing the struggles of other Japanese manufacturers (like Yamaha and Subaru) in F1, led them to cancel their entry into the sport. Isuzu eventually displayed the P799WE engine in a concept vehicle called the Isuzu Como F1, a radical mid-engine pickup truck unveiled at the 1991 Tokyo Motor Show. While the F1 program never materialized, the P799WE remains a symbol of Isuzu's ambitious engineering capabilities during that era. Today, one of the few surviving examples of the engine is kept at the Tamiya headquarters and the Isuzu Plaza museum. 🎥 Formula 1 #cars #japan #Isuzu #lotus
0:50

🇬🇧 Lotus 102C Isuzu V12 Test In 1991, Team Lotus secretly tested an experimental V12 Formula One engine developed by Isuzu. This project, which remains a fascinating "what-if" in motorsport history, centered on the Isuzu P799WE engine. The Engine (P799WE): A 75-degree, naturally aspirated 3.5-liter V12 designed by a small, four-person team at Isuzu. It was impressively powerful, producing between 640 and 765 bhp depending on the stage of development, which was competitive with the top engines of the era. The Chassis (Lotus 102C): To test the engine, Lotus modified its 102B chassis to accommodate the V12, renaming the resulting car the Lotus 102C. The Test: The car underwent system checks at the Hethel test track in late July and early August 1991. The primary on-track evaluation took place at Silverstone in early August 1991, with drivers Johnny Herbert and Mika Häkkinen conducting the tests. Performance: During the Silverstone test, the car was reportedly around six seconds off the pace of Ayrton Senna’s McLaren-Honda. Several factors contributed to this: the engine lacked an alternator (requiring heavy onboard batteries), the chassis was not optimized for the new V12, and the car was not running on specialized racing fuel or tires. Reliability: Despite the gap in lap times, the engine proved remarkably reliable during testing and was considered easy to work with by the Lotus mechanics. Economic Collapse: The project coincided with the collapse of the Japanese asset price bubble. This economic instability, combined with Isuzu witnessing the struggles of other Japanese manufacturers (like Yamaha and Subaru) in F1, led them to cancel their entry into the sport. Isuzu eventually displayed the P799WE engine in a concept vehicle called the Isuzu Como F1, a radical mid-engine pickup truck unveiled at the 1991 Tokyo Motor Show. While the F1 program never materialized, the P799WE remains a symbol of Isuzu's ambitious engineering capabilities during that era. Today, one of the few surviving examples of the engine is kept at the Tamiya headquarters and the Isuzu Plaza museum. 🎥 Formula 1 #cars #japan #Isuzu #lotus

WRCPAST

675,844 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I had never seen the Soviet Krechet spacesuit, developed for the Soviet Moon expedition, this close up and in such detail. Holy shit, the dieselpunk level is unreal. I mean, if the Americans flew and landed their spacecraft with a full-fledged computer on board, the Soviets were supposed to fly basically on mechanics and automation. In other words, straight-up Newtonian: everything as lever-and-vacuum-tube as possible — and the spacesuit is from exactly the same universe. And yes, in theory, they could have landed the spacecraft, but there was a high chance it would have been a “landing” with no return. Since the Soviet rocket was weaker, only one person was supposed to land on the Moon, not two as in the U.S. program. That’s why, in the tests, you can see them practicing ways for a cosmonaut to get back on his feet if he fell. Because there would be no one there to help you. It really does break your brain when you imagine a person in this “canvas-pump-and-dial” suit — alone, on the Moon. But it has to be admitted: yes, there is a certain charm to this kind of extreme engineering minimalism turned up to full dieselpunk.
1:30

I had never seen the Soviet Krechet spacesuit, developed for the Soviet Moon expedition, this close up and in such detail. Holy shit, the dieselpunk level is unreal. I mean, if the Americans flew and landed their spacecraft with a full-fledged computer on board, the Soviets were supposed to fly basically on mechanics and automation. In other words, straight-up Newtonian: everything as lever-and-vacuum-tube as possible — and the spacesuit is from exactly the same universe. And yes, in theory, they could have landed the spacecraft, but there was a high chance it would have been a “landing” with no return. Since the Soviet rocket was weaker, only one person was supposed to land on the Moon, not two as in the U.S. program. That’s why, in the tests, you can see them practicing ways for a cosmonaut to get back on his feet if he fell. Because there would be no one there to help you. It really does break your brain when you imagine a person in this “canvas-pump-and-dial” suit — alone, on the Moon. But it has to be admitted: yes, there is a certain charm to this kind of extreme engineering minimalism turned up to full dieselpunk.

Yigal Levin

198,837 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

David Simon on the barriers "The Wire" (2002-2008) faced: "Interviewer: Do you think the fact you're telling stories in different ways than is traditional, and it has this darkness to it, was that the big barrier to the show becoming more popular than it was? Would you say it was the racial makeup of the cast? Simon: There were a lot of barriers. The racial makeup of the cast was problematic and we knew that going in. The complexity of the serial itself -- the fact that you couldn't miss a couple of episodes and feel comfortable watching it. Though I think that HBO was a wonderful vehicle for that with the multiple viewings, the DVDs and ultimately with On Demand. It was less of a problem as the show went on. It was also less of a problem as people who watched the show got used to its rhythms. The first season was on some level training the audience to watch television a little bit differently, and reducing the expectations in terms of pacing, in terms of cliffhangers, in terms of the requirement to absorb detail or even to look for symbolism. Those were problems. The other problem is, no easy gratifications, other than some real effort at careful characterization and humor. That was it. Without the humor, it would have been unbearable. Without an acknowledgement of the humanity of the characters, despite all their flaws, their vanities, their absurdities -- if on some level, you can't make people care about the characters, you've got a problem no matter what you're doing. We had some obligations to people if they wanted to watch, but a happy ending was not among the list of obligations." (David Simon's interview with Alan Sepinwall, 2008) P.S: On this day, 24 years ago, the first episode of "The Wire" was aired worldwide.
2:34

David Simon on the barriers "The Wire" (2002-2008) faced: "Interviewer: Do you think the fact you're telling stories in different ways than is traditional, and it has this darkness to it, was that the big barrier to the show becoming more popular than it was? Would you say it was the racial makeup of the cast? Simon: There were a lot of barriers. The racial makeup of the cast was problematic and we knew that going in. The complexity of the serial itself -- the fact that you couldn't miss a couple of episodes and feel comfortable watching it. Though I think that HBO was a wonderful vehicle for that with the multiple viewings, the DVDs and ultimately with On Demand. It was less of a problem as the show went on. It was also less of a problem as people who watched the show got used to its rhythms. The first season was on some level training the audience to watch television a little bit differently, and reducing the expectations in terms of pacing, in terms of cliffhangers, in terms of the requirement to absorb detail or even to look for symbolism. Those were problems. The other problem is, no easy gratifications, other than some real effort at careful characterization and humor. That was it. Without the humor, it would have been unbearable. Without an acknowledgement of the humanity of the characters, despite all their flaws, their vanities, their absurdities -- if on some level, you can't make people care about the characters, you've got a problem no matter what you're doing. We had some obligations to people if they wanted to watch, but a happy ending was not among the list of obligations." (David Simon's interview with Alan Sepinwall, 2008) P.S: On this day, 24 years ago, the first episode of "The Wire" was aired worldwide.

DepressedBergman

33,114 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

In 1948, 76 beavers were parachuted into the Idaho wilderness as part of a relocation program by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. The program was initiated to address the growing conflict between humans and beavers in areas where people were building homes, such as Payette Lake. The beavers' natural activities, like dam building and tree cutting, were causing problems for the new residents. The relocation site, Chamberlain Basin, was chosen because it was a remote and suitable location for the beavers to thrive. However, the area was difficult to access due to the lack of roads. The solution was to use surplus parachutes from World War II to drop the beavers into their new home. A specially designed crate was created to ensure the safety of the beavers during the drop. After several test drops with a beaver named Geronimo, the project was deemed successful and continued until 1948. As a result, the beavers transformed the landscape into a lush wetland, creating a haven against fire and drought. Their descendants now live in what is part of the largest protected roadless forest in the continental United States.
1:19

In 1948, 76 beavers were parachuted into the Idaho wilderness as part of a relocation program by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. The program was initiated to address the growing conflict between humans and beavers in areas where people were building homes, such as Payette Lake. The beavers' natural activities, like dam building and tree cutting, were causing problems for the new residents. The relocation site, Chamberlain Basin, was chosen because it was a remote and suitable location for the beavers to thrive. However, the area was difficult to access due to the lack of roads. The solution was to use surplus parachutes from World War II to drop the beavers into their new home. A specially designed crate was created to ensure the safety of the beavers during the drop. After several test drops with a beaver named Geronimo, the project was deemed successful and continued until 1948. As a result, the beavers transformed the landscape into a lush wetland, creating a haven against fire and drought. Their descendants now live in what is part of the largest protected roadless forest in the continental United States.

Massimo

10,280,711 просмотров • 2 лет назад

In #Gujarat's #Ahmedabad, a woman driving her vehicle was stopped by the police for a driving licence check. While she was searching for her licence, it took some time. During this time, the woman asked the police officer to show his identification card. While returning the ID card to the officer, it accidentally slipped from her hand and fell on the ground. Following this, the police officer slapped the woman. As seen in the video, the officer later attempted to hit her with a baton but was stopped by other police personnel present at the scene. The woman later went to the police station to file a complaint; however, no FIR was registered based on her complaint. Instead, an FIR was registered against the woman for allegedly driving without a licence.
0:45

In #Gujarat's #Ahmedabad, a woman driving her vehicle was stopped by the police for a driving licence check. While she was searching for her licence, it took some time. During this time, the woman asked the police officer to show his identification card. While returning the ID card to the officer, it accidentally slipped from her hand and fell on the ground. Following this, the police officer slapped the woman. As seen in the video, the officer later attempted to hit her with a baton but was stopped by other police personnel present at the scene. The woman later went to the police station to file a complaint; however, no FIR was registered based on her complaint. Instead, an FIR was registered against the woman for allegedly driving without a licence.

Hate Detector 🔍

421,574 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Absolute bullshit yet again. There was NO THREAT to anyone at the event. A group was flying a drone over the event seeing as its banned in many other countries. Also several of the arrests were in connection with a shooting last week in Bradford, they were thought to be hiding at the event, believe it or not the main suspect is still on the run.... his name is Luqman Khan and he's a muslim 🤬. Disgusting that ur spreading misinformation as usual
3:00

Absolute bullshit yet again. There was NO THREAT to anyone at the event. A group was flying a drone over the event seeing as its banned in many other countries. Also several of the arrests were in connection with a shooting last week in Bradford, they were thought to be hiding at the event, believe it or not the main suspect is still on the run.... his name is Luqman Khan and he's a muslim 🤬. Disgusting that ur spreading misinformation as usual

🤍𝕁𝕆🤍

10,799 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"Washington is in shock": how the launch of the first Soviet satellite left the US behind in the space race, said the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova "For Moscow, this launch is proof that a country destroyed by war was able not only to recover but also to become a technological leader in a decade. Washington is in shock, which Western historians will call the 'satellite crisis'. The very idea of the West's technological superiority was called into question. If a Soviet satellite is flying over the US, it means that Soviet missiles could also reach American territory." A special project by Radio Sputnik and the ON Media holding company, "First Among the Stars", can be viewed on VK and RuTube 📌Subscribe to Radio Sputnik
1:26

"Washington is in shock": how the launch of the first Soviet satellite left the US behind in the space race, said the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova "For Moscow, this launch is proof that a country destroyed by war was able not only to recover but also to become a technological leader in a decade. Washington is in shock, which Western historians will call the 'satellite crisis'. The very idea of the West's technological superiority was called into question. If a Soviet satellite is flying over the US, it means that Soviet missiles could also reach American territory." A special project by Radio Sputnik and the ON Media holding company, "First Among the Stars", can be viewed on VK and RuTube 📌Subscribe to Radio Sputnik

Zlatti71

28,078 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A gentle reminder from Bruce Pardy that it was the Stephen Harper government in 2012 that repealed the sections of the Criminal Code that allowed residents to use "whatever force is necessary" against trespassers. AKA Castle Doctrine. Maxime Bernier, who was part of the government at that time, clarifies that in an effort to strengthen gun ownership rights, the law was changed as a compromise to the left as a political solution. In hindsight, this was a compromise that should not have happened, and we would be better off with the old laws that we had.
2:46

A gentle reminder from Bruce Pardy that it was the Stephen Harper government in 2012 that repealed the sections of the Criminal Code that allowed residents to use "whatever force is necessary" against trespassers. AKA Castle Doctrine. Maxime Bernier, who was part of the government at that time, clarifies that in an effort to strengthen gun ownership rights, the law was changed as a compromise to the left as a political solution. In hindsight, this was a compromise that should not have happened, and we would be better off with the old laws that we had.

Jason Lavigne

34,572 просмотров • 1 год назад

Today I was disqualified for the first time in my cycling career (14 years), for wearing glasses that record video. Unfortunately I was not aware of a new rule that was implemented in April that prohibited this. A warning, fine or yellow card could have also been enough. But what I struggle to understand is why In the Tour de France can you quite literally vlog with a camera in your hand which is perfectly legal...but because the camera is in the glasses you get an automatic Disqualification?! Yes, If I knew about the rule I would have also never posted it on social media. Anyways, I'll take it on the chin. Here is the video that got me disqualified & the other video is just to show what is completely allowed it seems. And lastly, my glasses have absolutely no AI capabilities unless used with a phone. So on the bike it can do nothing but record video!
0:17

Today I was disqualified for the first time in my cycling career (14 years), for wearing glasses that record video. Unfortunately I was not aware of a new rule that was implemented in April that prohibited this. A warning, fine or yellow card could have also been enough. But what I struggle to understand is why In the Tour de France can you quite literally vlog with a camera in your hand which is perfectly legal...but because the camera is in the glasses you get an automatic Disqualification?! Yes, If I knew about the rule I would have also never posted it on social media. Anyways, I'll take it on the chin. Here is the video that got me disqualified & the other video is just to show what is completely allowed it seems. And lastly, my glasses have absolutely no AI capabilities unless used with a phone. So on the bike it can do nothing but record video!

Willie Smit

895,787 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

'Larijani was killed after he lost his status as the main candidate for the leadership of the transition period,' — CNN host Amanpour. 'What's even worse for the US and Israel, even analysts on their side are now actually saying that it is Iran that is currently driving the situation. And we don't see any end to it. At least from the American side, it is believed that there is no way out of this situation, because everything is in the hands of the IRGC. Larijani was the Speaker of Parliament for many years, he is very close to the IRGC, was close to the former Supreme Leader. He was considered a preferred figure for the transition period. If they were looking for someone with whom they could agree, then in September last year, that is, about six months ago, he was the main candidate. But then in February this year, that is, about a month ago, he lost this status and became a target, as he took, as expected, a tough stance in response to the actions of the US and Israel after the start of the war. And this again raises the question: what is the plan of Israel and Trump, except to continue the bombings and, as the targets are exhausted, to increasingly approach strikes on civilian objects? And the number of civilian victims continues to grow.' - SK
2:03

'Larijani was killed after he lost his status as the main candidate for the leadership of the transition period,' — CNN host Amanpour. 'What's even worse for the US and Israel, even analysts on their side are now actually saying that it is Iran that is currently driving the situation. And we don't see any end to it. At least from the American side, it is believed that there is no way out of this situation, because everything is in the hands of the IRGC. Larijani was the Speaker of Parliament for many years, he is very close to the IRGC, was close to the former Supreme Leader. He was considered a preferred figure for the transition period. If they were looking for someone with whom they could agree, then in September last year, that is, about six months ago, he was the main candidate. But then in February this year, that is, about a month ago, he lost this status and became a target, as he took, as expected, a tough stance in response to the actions of the US and Israel after the start of the war. And this again raises the question: what is the plan of Israel and Trump, except to continue the bombings and, as the targets are exhausted, to increasingly approach strikes on civilian objects? And the number of civilian victims continues to grow.' - SK

Zlatti71

15,270 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 "We don't have a new understanding. The ceasefire understanding is the same thing that was announced on April 2nd. One of the rightful demands of our people was that this ceasefire must include Lebanon as well." Iranian FM spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei on Araghchi's announcement: From day one, the other side evaded regarding the inclusion of Lebanon in the ceasefire. After the ceasefire was announced in Lebanon last night, Iran reciprocally announced passage in the Strait of Hormuz based on the same coordinates previously announced. "The other side did not properly implement the ceasefire understanding. We also, reciprocally, took the necessary actions. They were complaining that passage in the Strait of Hormuz was not being done as it was supposed to be. What was the reason? The other side was not adhering to its commitments. Therefore, the other side decided to fulfill its commitments regarding stopping fire in Lebanon. We reciprocally ensure safe passage."
4:21

🇮🇷🇺🇸 "We don't have a new understanding. The ceasefire understanding is the same thing that was announced on April 2nd. One of the rightful demands of our people was that this ceasefire must include Lebanon as well." Iranian FM spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei on Araghchi's announcement: From day one, the other side evaded regarding the inclusion of Lebanon in the ceasefire. After the ceasefire was announced in Lebanon last night, Iran reciprocally announced passage in the Strait of Hormuz based on the same coordinates previously announced. "The other side did not properly implement the ceasefire understanding. We also, reciprocally, took the necessary actions. They were complaining that passage in the Strait of Hormuz was not being done as it was supposed to be. What was the reason? The other side was not adhering to its commitments. Therefore, the other side decided to fulfill its commitments regarding stopping fire in Lebanon. We reciprocally ensure safe passage."

DD Geopolitics

17,095 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад