正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Very clear proof Candace Owens lied about the Macron administration attempting to lower the age of consent in France. Equality Minister Marlène Schiappa explained on French TV in 2017 (video below) how the Macron administration was behind efforts to introduce a law classifying any sex with a minor under... a certain age as statutory r@pe. At the time, France didn’t have such a law—adult men were avoiding rape convictions for sex with children as young as 11 by claiming it was consensual. While experts debated whether the threshold should be 13 or 15, the Macron administration ultimately legislated a fixed age of 15 in 2021. Owens’ claim that the Macron government “attempted to lower the age of consent" to 13 is a blatant lie—the law strengthened protections, it didn’t weaken them. *Video has been translated with AI. Original in French is posted below.show more

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

84,570 subscribers

30,767 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Candace Owens just BLATANTLY LIES about Macron trying to lower the age of consent in France! Candace claims that Emmanuelle Macron in his first term attempted to lower the age of consent in France from 15 to 13. This is not only a lie it's actually the OPPOSITE of the truth. France established an age of consent at 15 in 1945. HOWEVER France had no statutory r@pe law - consent could still be claimed in court, even for sex with children under 15, when Macron came into office. After several high profile cases of grown men getting off with lighter sentences for having sex with 11 year olds (they argued were consensual). Macron in his first term fought for & eventually implemented in 2021 a law for it to be considered a statutory r@pe offence for adults to have sex with someone under the age of 15. There were senators that argued the age should be 13. However they were NOT a part of Macron's government. It’s a blatant disgusting lie she appears to be using to both push a conspiracy and undermine Macron amid his lawsuit.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

503,176 次观看 • 11 个月前

🇫🇷🇮🇹Recently, there was a bit of a clash between Macron and Meloni. It started after Meloni referenced the murder of Quentin, a young French activist killed in what authorities described as a politically motivated attack. Macron pushed back, saying French affairs should stay in France. Macron, referencing Meloni, says it’s ironic that self-described nationalists are often the first to tell other countries to mind their own business. Meloni, responding to Macron: "I was very impressed by this statement. I didn't expect it. France gave political asylum to Red Brigadists (terrorists) for decades. I think interference is something else." The criticism of Macron is about double standards. French leaders often comment on rule of law issues in other EU countries, including Italy.

🇫🇷🇮🇹Recently, there was a bit of a clash between Macron and Meloni. It started after Meloni referenced the murder of Quentin, a young French activist killed in what authorities described as a politically motivated attack. Macron pushed back, saying French affairs should stay in France. Macron, referencing Meloni, says it’s ironic that self-described nationalists are often the first to tell other countries to mind their own business. Meloni, responding to Macron: "I was very impressed by this statement. I didn't expect it. France gave political asylum to Red Brigadists (terrorists) for decades. I think interference is something else." The criticism of Macron is about double standards. French leaders often comment on rule of law issues in other EU countries, including Italy.

Mario Nawfal

106,006 次观看 • 5 个月前

Recently, there was a bit of a clash between Macron and Meloni. It started after Meloni referenced the murder of Quentin, a young French activist killed in what authorities described as a politically motivated attack. Macron pushed back, saying French affairs should stay in France. Macron, referencing Meloni, says it’s ironic that self-described nationalists are often the first to tell other countries to mind their own business. Meloni, responding to Macron: "I was very impressed by this statement. I didn't expect it. France gave political asylum to Red Brigadists (terrorists) for decades. I think interference is something else." The criticism of Macron is about double standards. French leaders often comment on rule of law issues in other EU countries, including Italy. - Mario Nawfal

Recently, there was a bit of a clash between Macron and Meloni. It started after Meloni referenced the murder of Quentin, a young French activist killed in what authorities described as a politically motivated attack. Macron pushed back, saying French affairs should stay in France. Macron, referencing Meloni, says it’s ironic that self-described nationalists are often the first to tell other countries to mind their own business. Meloni, responding to Macron: "I was very impressed by this statement. I didn't expect it. France gave political asylum to Red Brigadists (terrorists) for decades. I think interference is something else." The criticism of Macron is about double standards. French leaders often comment on rule of law issues in other EU countries, including Italy. - Mario Nawfal

Imtiaz Mahmood

13,886 次观看 • 5 个月前

Candace Owens contradicts herself talking about Brigitte Macron evidence with Piers Morgan. She claimed the only evidence Brigitte Macron submitted in her defamation case was an “expired voting ID.” Yet just last week, Owens herself reported that both Macron and her brother Jean‑Michel Trogneux had submitted separate voter registration cards, proving they were registered & voted in different cities. Owens also showed that both submitted photo IDs. She claimed Trogneux’s ID had expired in April 2022 — but if, as she reported, it was issued in April 2012, then French law grants it a 15-year validity, meaning it would still be valid until 2027. Appears Candace can't keep track of what's supposed to be true. Meanwhile Candace continues to push the narrative that the recent court case in France was about whether Brigitte Macron is a man — and that the fact Brigitte “lost” is proof that she is one. This is patently false. The case was a defamation trial, not a gender trial. That’s why only a limited amount of evidence was presented to establish that Brigitte Macron is who she says she is — and not her brother. The French court ultimately ruled that the journalists’ statements were made in good faith (meaning they believed them), were not intended to cause harm, and were therefore protected under French free speech laws.

Candace Owens contradicts herself talking about Brigitte Macron evidence with Piers Morgan. She claimed the only evidence Brigitte Macron submitted in her defamation case was an “expired voting ID.” Yet just last week, Owens herself reported that both Macron and her brother Jean‑Michel Trogneux had submitted separate voter registration cards, proving they were registered & voted in different cities. Owens also showed that both submitted photo IDs. She claimed Trogneux’s ID had expired in April 2022 — but if, as she reported, it was issued in April 2012, then French law grants it a 15-year validity, meaning it would still be valid until 2027. Appears Candace can't keep track of what's supposed to be true. Meanwhile Candace continues to push the narrative that the recent court case in France was about whether Brigitte Macron is a man — and that the fact Brigitte “lost” is proof that she is one. This is patently false. The case was a defamation trial, not a gender trial. That’s why only a limited amount of evidence was presented to establish that Brigitte Macron is who she says she is — and not her brother. The French court ultimately ruled that the journalists’ statements were made in good faith (meaning they believed them), were not intended to cause harm, and were therefore protected under French free speech laws.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

12,309 次观看 • 11 个月前

NEW: French President Macron has enlisted an American "Crisis PR Firm" to lobby TikTok to take down any videos talking about his "wife," Brigitte Macron, being a biological male. "In one day, all four of the becoming Brigitte clips that we cut on TikTok were hit with strikes, and my account is now facing a ban." - Candace Owens. Keep in mind that the Macrons refused to answer whether Brigitte was born male in legal correspondence with Candace Owens's lawyer. Candace's videos have made huge waves in France, and it appears that Mr. Macron and Mr. Macron are in panic mode.

NEW: French President Macron has enlisted an American "Crisis PR Firm" to lobby TikTok to take down any videos talking about his "wife," Brigitte Macron, being a biological male. "In one day, all four of the becoming Brigitte clips that we cut on TikTok were hit with strikes, and my account is now facing a ban." - Candace Owens. Keep in mind that the Macrons refused to answer whether Brigitte was born male in legal correspondence with Candace Owens's lawyer. Candace's videos have made huge waves in France, and it appears that Mr. Macron and Mr. Macron are in panic mode.

George

1,563,871 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Candace Owens just claimed that the French presidential Macron family have paid to have her assassinated and went on to claim an Israeli agent is in the conspiracy. Candace also announced that she was allegedly told by a high ranking official in the French government that Charlie Kirk’s assassin trained with the French Legion’s 13th Brigade and that multiple governments were involved.

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Candace Owens just claimed that the French presidential Macron family have paid to have her assassinated and went on to claim an Israeli agent is in the conspiracy. Candace also announced that she was allegedly told by a high ranking official in the French government that Charlie Kirk’s assassin trained with the French Legion’s 13th Brigade and that multiple governments were involved.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

1,163,240 次观看 • 8 个月前

This is problematic, and it’s also one of the reasons some people still believe Marital Rǎpę is a myth. Rãpę isn’t always violent or forceful. The defining factor in every case is CONSENT. In this situation, even if it looks like the kid agreed, the law is clear, at 16, he is below the age of consent and legally cannot give valid consent. That automatically classifies this as Statutory Rǎpė.

Sensitive content

This is problematic, and it’s also one of the reasons some people still believe Marital Rǎpę is a myth. Rãpę isn’t always violent or forceful. The defining factor in every case is CONSENT. In this situation, even if it looks like the kid agreed, the law is clear, at 16, he is below the age of consent and legally cannot give valid consent. That automatically classifies this as Statutory Rǎpė.

GIDI

87,293 次观看 • 7 个月前

🇫🇷 MACRON’S WIFE IS A MAN IN THE TAX REGISTRY Brigitte Macron, the wife of the President of France Emmanuel Macron, is registered as a man in the tax registry. This was reported by the BFM TV channel, citing a representative of the First Lady of France, Tristan Bromet. According to BFM, Brigitte recently discovered that on the French tax website her gender is listed as male, and the name is recorded as Jean-Michel. The First Lady has already filed a complaint.

🇫🇷 MACRON’S WIFE IS A MAN IN THE TAX REGISTRY Brigitte Macron, the wife of the President of France Emmanuel Macron, is registered as a man in the tax registry. This was reported by the BFM TV channel, citing a representative of the First Lady of France, Tristan Bromet. According to BFM, Brigitte recently discovered that on the French tax website her gender is listed as male, and the name is recorded as Jean-Michel. The First Lady has already filed a complaint.

Lord Bebo

257,851 次观看 • 8 个月前

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: French President Emmanuel Macron announced that ‘Freemasonry is leading a vital struggle for the benefit of humanity.’ Addressing the Grande Loge de France in Paris, President Macron noted that the Freemasons' insignia has frequently been the subject of conspiracy theories. President Macron urged Freemasons to take pride in their endorsement of the euthanasia legislation, describing it as "a matter of utmost importance."

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: French President Emmanuel Macron announced that ‘Freemasonry is leading a vital struggle for the benefit of humanity.’ Addressing the Grande Loge de France in Paris, President Macron noted that the Freemasons' insignia has frequently been the subject of conspiracy theories. President Macron urged Freemasons to take pride in their endorsement of the euthanasia legislation, describing it as "a matter of utmost importance."

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

403,604 次观看 • 1 年前

Brigitte Macron had attacked the 2 journalists that claimed she was a man. French justice clearly stated that journalists had not breached French laws. Brigitte Macron NEVER attacked the journalists on their claim that she was a man but rather, attacked them on "violation of private life" Zoé Sagan Candace Owens The whole story is coming out. And Macron wants to go to war as a diversion and maybe because the globalist elites are blackmailing him. Keep in mind also that the FBI had raided Trump's residence because he had some explosive files on Macron's private life. Candace Owens is exposing the story, and remember....she is close to Trump who himself has secret info on Macron.

Brigitte Macron had attacked the 2 journalists that claimed she was a man. French justice clearly stated that journalists had not breached French laws. Brigitte Macron NEVER attacked the journalists on their claim that she was a man but rather, attacked them on "violation of private life" Zoé Sagan Candace Owens The whole story is coming out. And Macron wants to go to war as a diversion and maybe because the globalist elites are blackmailing him. Keep in mind also that the FBI had raided Trump's residence because he had some explosive files on Macron's private life. Candace Owens is exposing the story, and remember....she is close to Trump who himself has secret info on Macron.

Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹

2,094,426 次观看 • 2 年前

Private school teacher charged with r*ping two former students after Massachusetts changed its law on teacher-student relations. Matthew Rutledge, now 64, also known as 'Mr. Wonderful,' taught at Miss Hall’s School for over 30 years. Melissa Fares and Hilary Simon, both now in their 30s, are accusing Rutledge of abusing them. "He began grooming me at 15 years old … and his abuse of me continued for years after I left that campus. After more than two decades, this case is finally in the hands of the criminal justice system," Simon said. Prosecutors initially turned down the charges because the girls were 16 or older, and it was not illegal for teachers to have s*x with students above the age of consent. The age of consent in Massachusetts is 16. "Massachusetts law defines the age of consent as 16. While the alleged behavior is profoundly troubling, it is not illegal," said Berkshire District Attorney Timothy Shugrue in 2024. It wasn't until a state bill was passed that made it a crime for a teacher to have s*x with a student that Rutledge was charged. Rutledge has entered not-guilty pleas to three counts of r*pe.

Sensitive content

Private school teacher charged with rping two former students after Massachusetts changed its law on teacher-student relations. Matthew Rutledge, now 64, also known as 'Mr. Wonderful,' taught at Miss Hall’s School for over 30 years. Melissa Fares and Hilary Simon, both now in their 30s, are accusing Rutledge of abusing them. "He began grooming me at 15 years old … and his abuse of me continued for years after I left that campus. After more than two decades, this case is finally in the hands of the criminal justice system," Simon said. Prosecutors initially turned down the charges because the girls were 16 or older, and it was not illegal for teachers to have sx with students above the age of consent. The age of consent in Massachusetts is 16. "Massachusetts law defines the age of consent as 16. While the alleged behavior is profoundly troubling, it is not illegal," said Berkshire District Attorney Timothy Shugrue in 2024. It wasn't until a state bill was passed that made it a crime for a teacher to have sx with a student that Rutledge was charged. Rutledge has entered not-guilty pleas to three counts of rpe.

Collin Rugg

1,804,101 次观看 • 2 个月前

The arguments put forth by some lawyers for reducing the age of sexual consent to 16 are shockingly unscientific and illogical, and it would be criminally tragic if the Supreme court was swayed by them. My views, on why this is as much a matter of science as it is of law:

The arguments put forth by some lawyers for reducing the age of sexual consent to 16 are shockingly unscientific and illogical, and it would be criminally tragic if the Supreme court was swayed by them. My views, on why this is as much a matter of science as it is of law:

Anand Ranganathan

139,014 次观看 • 5 天前

As a journalist and broadcaster, I have spent many years on TV discussing one subject or another. It’s only with the benefit of hindsight that some of those conversations take on a new meaning. Here I am on ITV’s This Morning in 2013, we are debating reducing the age of consent in the UK. I am opposed to it. I believe it will make children even more vulnerable to predators and I can’t work out why adults continually want to rush children into sexual relationships. One of the TV hosts challenges me claiming that children: “…don’t give a damn about the law. They're not bothering about the law. They don’t care whether the age of consent is 13 or 16,” he says. Years later that same man – Phillip Schofield – was found to have been conducting an inappropriate relationship with a junior male member of staff. Schofield and his co-host, Holly Willoughby, faked a ‘he’s gay’ coming out scenario. The rumour in newsrooms was Schofield’s ‘affair’ with the lad was about to be exposed. Schofield says it was ‘legal’ but there remain question marks over what age the lad was when they met. Later, Schofield’s brother, Timothy, would be convicted of 11 counts of sexually abusing a child. Like I said, this conversation now hits differently.

As a journalist and broadcaster, I have spent many years on TV discussing one subject or another. It’s only with the benefit of hindsight that some of those conversations take on a new meaning. Here I am on ITV’s This Morning in 2013, we are debating reducing the age of consent in the UK. I am opposed to it. I believe it will make children even more vulnerable to predators and I can’t work out why adults continually want to rush children into sexual relationships. One of the TV hosts challenges me claiming that children: “…don’t give a damn about the law. They're not bothering about the law. They don’t care whether the age of consent is 13 or 16,” he says. Years later that same man – Phillip Schofield – was found to have been conducting an inappropriate relationship with a junior male member of staff. Schofield and his co-host, Holly Willoughby, faked a ‘he’s gay’ coming out scenario. The rumour in newsrooms was Schofield’s ‘affair’ with the lad was about to be exposed. Schofield says it was ‘legal’ but there remain question marks over what age the lad was when they met. Later, Schofield’s brother, Timothy, would be convicted of 11 counts of sexually abusing a child. Like I said, this conversation now hits differently.

Sonia Poulton

28,757 次观看 • 4 个月前

The arguments put forth by lawyers advocating for reducing the age of sexual consent to 16 are shockingly unscientific and illogical, and it would be tragic if the Supreme court was swayed by them. My views, on why this is as much a matter of science as it is of law:

The arguments put forth by lawyers advocating for reducing the age of sexual consent to 16 are shockingly unscientific and illogical, and it would be tragic if the Supreme court was swayed by them. My views, on why this is as much a matter of science as it is of law:

Anand Ranganathan

531,298 次观看 • 8 个月前

This is quite extraordinary: George Simion, who won the first round of Romania's elections, went on French TV to call Macron a "dictator" and to denounce France's "huge" interference in Romania's elections. Here's what he said: "I love France. I like French culture. I love the French people, but I don't like the dictatorship of Emmanuel Macron. France interfered in the Romanian elections and the French Ambassador, under orders of Emmanuel Macron, discussed with the President of the Constitutional Court, the one who cancelled the elections in Romania. The French Ambassador was on tour these last weeks in all regions in Romania to persuade Romanian businessmen and institutions to support the opposite candidate. The mayor of Bucharest... [So you're saying there is interference by Emmanuel Macron in the Romanian election?] Yes, a huge one! [...] It is very serious. We are not Iran. We are not a country where there are ayatollahs who say who can be a candidate and who cannot."

This is quite extraordinary: George Simion, who won the first round of Romania's elections, went on French TV to call Macron a "dictator" and to denounce France's "huge" interference in Romania's elections. Here's what he said: "I love France. I like French culture. I love the French people, but I don't like the dictatorship of Emmanuel Macron. France interfered in the Romanian elections and the French Ambassador, under orders of Emmanuel Macron, discussed with the President of the Constitutional Court, the one who cancelled the elections in Romania. The French Ambassador was on tour these last weeks in all regions in Romania to persuade Romanian businessmen and institutions to support the opposite candidate. The mayor of Bucharest... [So you're saying there is interference by Emmanuel Macron in the Romanian election?] Yes, a huge one! [...] It is very serious. We are not Iran. We are not a country where there are ayatollahs who say who can be a candidate and who cannot."

Arnaud Bertrand

268,335 次观看 • 1 年前

Watch Candace Owens put her tinfoil hat on and hilariously continue to push Brigitte Macron is her own brother - despite the overwhelming evidence proving otherwise! Candace Owens continues to push the narrative that the recent court case in France was about whether Brigitte Macron is a man — and that the fact Brigitte “lost” is proof that she is one. This is patently false. The case was a defamation trial, not a gender trial. That’s why only a limited amount of evidence was presented to establish that Brigitte Macron is who she says she is — and not her brother. The French court ultimately ruled that the journalists’ statements were made in good faith (meaning they believed them), were not intended to cause harm, and were therefore protected under French free speech laws. What’s the difference between defamation law in the U.S. and France? The U.S. requires more proof than France in defamation cases because American law strongly protects free speech — especially when it concerns public figures. To win, the plaintiff must not only prove the statement is false, but also that the speaker acted with “actual malice” — meaning they knew it was false or showed reckless disregard for the truth. This is where Candace Owens is in a far worse position than the two French journalists: the Macrons argue she had ample evidence refuting the claim and chose to repeat it anyway — making malice much easier to prove. Evidence the Macrons have presented in the U.S. case to prove Brigitte Macron is Brigitte Macron: -Birth Certificate & Birth Announcement The complaint includes Brigitte Macron’s official birth certificate, showing she was born Brigitte Trogneux in Amiens, France. It also refers to a media birth announcement contemporaneous with her birth, further confirming the record -Childhood & Family Photographs Multiple family photos were included, illustrating Brigitte’s life trajectory and clearly distinguishing her from her brother Jean‑Michel. Some show her with her mother, father, and children, underscoring a continuous identity separate from the conspiracy narrative. -Marriage, Divorce & Children Records Records confirming she had three children with her former husband, demonstrating the timeline of her life as a woman, are cited as part of the evidence to refute claims of identity fraud -Genealogical & Maternal Background The filings detail her family lineage—the Trogneux family history, her parents' identities, and her brother Jean‑Michel's documented existence—to emphasize that she and Jean‑Michel are two distinct individuals -Legal Correspondence & Retraction Requests The Macrons sent multiple formal retraction notices to Candace Owens, including full disclosure of the documentary evidence listed above. Owens ignored these and continued promoting the false claims, which forms part of their “actual malice” defamation argument under U.S. law

Watch Candace Owens put her tinfoil hat on and hilariously continue to push Brigitte Macron is her own brother - despite the overwhelming evidence proving otherwise! Candace Owens continues to push the narrative that the recent court case in France was about whether Brigitte Macron is a man — and that the fact Brigitte “lost” is proof that she is one. This is patently false. The case was a defamation trial, not a gender trial. That’s why only a limited amount of evidence was presented to establish that Brigitte Macron is who she says she is — and not her brother. The French court ultimately ruled that the journalists’ statements were made in good faith (meaning they believed them), were not intended to cause harm, and were therefore protected under French free speech laws. What’s the difference between defamation law in the U.S. and France? The U.S. requires more proof than France in defamation cases because American law strongly protects free speech — especially when it concerns public figures. To win, the plaintiff must not only prove the statement is false, but also that the speaker acted with “actual malice” — meaning they knew it was false or showed reckless disregard for the truth. This is where Candace Owens is in a far worse position than the two French journalists: the Macrons argue she had ample evidence refuting the claim and chose to repeat it anyway — making malice much easier to prove. Evidence the Macrons have presented in the U.S. case to prove Brigitte Macron is Brigitte Macron: -Birth Certificate & Birth Announcement The complaint includes Brigitte Macron’s official birth certificate, showing she was born Brigitte Trogneux in Amiens, France. It also refers to a media birth announcement contemporaneous with her birth, further confirming the record -Childhood & Family Photographs Multiple family photos were included, illustrating Brigitte’s life trajectory and clearly distinguishing her from her brother Jean‑Michel. Some show her with her mother, father, and children, underscoring a continuous identity separate from the conspiracy narrative. -Marriage, Divorce & Children Records Records confirming she had three children with her former husband, demonstrating the timeline of her life as a woman, are cited as part of the evidence to refute claims of identity fraud -Genealogical & Maternal Background The filings detail her family lineage—the Trogneux family history, her parents' identities, and her brother Jean‑Michel's documented existence—to emphasize that she and Jean‑Michel are two distinct individuals -Legal Correspondence & Retraction Requests The Macrons sent multiple formal retraction notices to Candace Owens, including full disclosure of the documentary evidence listed above. Owens ignored these and continued promoting the false claims, which forms part of their “actual malice” defamation argument under U.S. law

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

133,477 次观看 • 11 个月前