Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

VERY unique spot here bluff catching vs Nick Petrangelo 3-handed while Kristen Foxen all in for the side-pot Payouts 1st - $309k 🏆 2nd - $202k 3rd - $147k Nick (60bb) raise 2bb Button Kristen (2.5bb) calls SB with 0.5bb back I (30bbs) call Q♦️J♠️ in BB J♦️8♦️4❤️6♦️K♣️ runout...

FarazJaka's profile picture

Faraz Jaka

47,814 subscribers

85,082 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This hand hurt my brain a little bit on 4.5h of sleep after the fire last night. Very Interesting spot 2 away from the money at $3k MGM National Harbor Main. I min raise JTo CO 20k off 23bbs. Justin Liberto calls BB off 15bbs. K♠️Q♠️K♦️ I bet 15k he calls K♣️ turn check check River Q❤️ he jams 116k Feel like I’m supposed to call crazy wide here, only lose to quads. But… - Bad blockers in my hand other than I didn’t have a spade. - We can only win half the pot - We are on the bubble. How wide should we call here? What can I fold? Will run it in the next day or two and post the video results and solver output, assuming he jams his whole range here.
0:45

This hand hurt my brain a little bit on 4.5h of sleep after the fire last night. Very Interesting spot 2 away from the money at $3k MGM National Harbor Main. I min raise JTo CO 20k off 23bbs. Justin Liberto calls BB off 15bbs. K♠️Q♠️K♦️ I bet 15k he calls K♣️ turn check check River Q❤️ he jams 116k Feel like I’m supposed to call crazy wide here, only lose to quads. But… - Bad blockers in my hand other than I didn’t have a spade. - We can only win half the pot - We are on the bubble. How wide should we call here? What can I fold? Will run it in the next day or two and post the video results and solver output, assuming he jams his whole range here.

Faraz Jaka

46,457 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

K♣️T♣️ UTG2 60k in WSOP $10k Main Event Day 1. Level 3: Blinds 200/400 It’s my second orbit, entire table is mostly casual players. UTG raise 1k, I call, sb calls, BB calls 7♣️5♣️2♣️ UTG bets 3k, I call, BB (70+ year old recreational player) checkraise 8.5k, UTG fold, I call Q♠️ he bets 15k If I call I’ll have 35k behind & 54.6k in the pot & he covers by just a few thousand chips. What’s his range & what would you do here? Here’s the footage below if you want to get your own reads. 📺 Hit like or reply on this post if you want to see the outcome, I’ll post it tomorrow night.
1:14

K♣️T♣️ UTG2 60k in WSOP $10k Main Event Day 1. Level 3: Blinds 200/400 It’s my second orbit, entire table is mostly casual players. UTG raise 1k, I call, sb calls, BB calls 7♣️5♣️2♣️ UTG bets 3k, I call, BB (70+ year old recreational player) checkraise 8.5k, UTG fold, I call Q♠️ he bets 15k If I call I’ll have 35k behind & 54.6k in the pot & he covers by just a few thousand chips. What’s his range & what would you do here? Here’s the footage below if you want to get your own reads. 📺 Hit like or reply on this post if you want to see the outcome, I’ll post it tomorrow night.

Faraz Jaka

176,019 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

GM GM GM ! (๑✪ᆺ✪๑)/❤️ 🔥𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗛🔥 ✨𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓 — A BIG shoutout to 𝗕𝗕𝗡𝗢$ & 𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 for the dopest song of 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓! 🎬𝗚𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲 & 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 them, see the full-quality video — links at the end of this article. ⛩️𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝘀𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝘀𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝘁'𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻🔻 ♦️As I mentioned before, I really don’t understand how people keep falling for these infoFi scams and other post-grinding projects. 🔸I’m talking about Loudio, P33lio, Yapyo, Fukyo — you know them all. You all get RUGGED every time but still keep doing it. 🔸Do you really think Spermify ( you all know who I’m referring to ) or other web3 brands give a shit if you lose money, time, and effort? Of course not — but you should. 🔸And here’s why🔻 ~ 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗥𝗘𝗧: The top 10 “influencers” you see as web3 gods are not grinding like you — they are paid per post. I know because I was offered the same. Also, they are not real influencers — real influencers charge thousands of $$$ per post and do not shill anything. ~ They don’t give a shit because they get paid upfront. But you shill daily for nothing — and the worst part is, you shill to your own community and followers. Do you even realize how many people lose money because you don’t think about what you’re doing? ~ What if you had to pay back every person in your community who invested in what you shilled and then lost everything? ~ 𝗚𝗥𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗞 𝗨𝗣 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗕𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗕𝗟𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧. I’m referring to people who have communities that actually follow their calls and post — not just simple creators shilling anything. ♦️If you ever see me launch another NFT project or a coin, know that I guarantee your money back if you’re not satisfied. No shady shit — Senpai never toys with people’s funds! ♦️You’ll rarely see me post anything, because I don’t post bullshit. I don’t want to harm anyone’s wallet, so I prefer to REFUSE the $$$ — no matter the amount! ♦️ You’ll see people saying they never engage in drama — yet all their posts are nothing but attention-seeking drama. Don’t believe me? Just look around. ♦️ You’ll see “smart” mofos claiming other people aren’t organic. Mfer… NOTHING in web3 is organic. Not a single post. All the comments are in exchange for something — whether from influencers or projects. They just talk shit coz their accounts & persona are nothing and they are lazy to work for it! ♦️There’s a lot of FUD regarding girls in web3. While some girls are real gamers or content creators, keep in mind that literally 95% are managed by dudes — even if the photos or videos are real. Also, notice how many of the girls you guys goon over in web3 today just removed all their booty photos after they got followers & attention, or deleted all the photos with themselves. If anyone’s curious, DM me — there are peeps that have all their sexy pics, even if they deleted them. 🔸Now they claim to be gamer influencers, but we also have proof that they’re completely managed by dudes ( literally the guys confessing they do everything for them ). I’m not saying all web3 females are fake, but just don’t get fooled bros, ur talking to guys not girls. 💮𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼’𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗪𝗲𝗯3, 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂. 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗽𝘂𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 — 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗼 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿🧡 ♦️Why do I make these posts? Because someone has to, so people don’t get scammed, rugged, and so on! ♦️If you’re a bit confused, go read my other posts🔻 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ♦️If you see Senpai post something, you know it’s legit. ♦️If you disagree with what I said, then I’m sorry — the truth always hurts. I probably touched your little attention-whore soft spot, and that’s why you’ll never have the balls to post the truth like some of us. You’re too afraid to harm your perfect 𝗙𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗨𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡! ♦️ BROKIES DO IT FOR THE B!TCHES! ♦️ LEGENDS HAVE B!TCHES TO DO IT FOR THEM! ♦️ I CAN RETIRE JUST WITH MY WRIST✨⌚️✨ ♦️ SENPAI WILL NOT SHILL YOUR RUGS MOFOS! 🔥𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 & 𝗮𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗮: 𝘄𝗲𝗯2 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗹𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝘁 $10𝗸 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝕏 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 𝗪𝗼𝗼𝗽 𝗪𝗼𝗼𝗽🔥 🌸𝑰 𝒉𝒐𝒑𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒆𝒏𝒋𝒐𝒚𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒍𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕 & 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒌𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒅💜 🎬𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝗕𝗡𝗢$: 🎬𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘: ⭐️𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐅𝐈𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐑 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄⭐️
3:27

GM GM GM ! (๑✪ᆺ✪๑)/❤️ 🔥𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗛🔥 ✨𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓 — A BIG shoutout to 𝗕𝗕𝗡𝗢$ & 𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 for the dopest song of 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓! 🎬𝗚𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲 & 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 them, see the full-quality video — links at the end of this article. ⛩️𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝘀𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝘀𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝘁'𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻🔻 ♦️As I mentioned before, I really don’t understand how people keep falling for these infoFi scams and other post-grinding projects. 🔸I’m talking about Loudio, P33lio, Yapyo, Fukyo — you know them all. You all get RUGGED every time but still keep doing it. 🔸Do you really think Spermify ( you all know who I’m referring to ) or other web3 brands give a shit if you lose money, time, and effort? Of course not — but you should. 🔸And here’s why🔻 ~ 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗥𝗘𝗧: The top 10 “influencers” you see as web3 gods are not grinding like you — they are paid per post. I know because I was offered the same. Also, they are not real influencers — real influencers charge thousands of $$$ per post and do not shill anything. ~ They don’t give a shit because they get paid upfront. But you shill daily for nothing — and the worst part is, you shill to your own community and followers. Do you even realize how many people lose money because you don’t think about what you’re doing? ~ What if you had to pay back every person in your community who invested in what you shilled and then lost everything? ~ 𝗚𝗥𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗞 𝗨𝗣 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗕𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗕𝗟𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧. I’m referring to people who have communities that actually follow their calls and post — not just simple creators shilling anything. ♦️If you ever see me launch another NFT project or a coin, know that I guarantee your money back if you’re not satisfied. No shady shit — Senpai never toys with people’s funds! ♦️You’ll rarely see me post anything, because I don’t post bullshit. I don’t want to harm anyone’s wallet, so I prefer to REFUSE the $$$ — no matter the amount! ♦️ You’ll see people saying they never engage in drama — yet all their posts are nothing but attention-seeking drama. Don’t believe me? Just look around. ♦️ You’ll see “smart” mofos claiming other people aren’t organic. Mfer… NOTHING in web3 is organic. Not a single post. All the comments are in exchange for something — whether from influencers or projects. They just talk shit coz their accounts & persona are nothing and they are lazy to work for it! ♦️There’s a lot of FUD regarding girls in web3. While some girls are real gamers or content creators, keep in mind that literally 95% are managed by dudes — even if the photos or videos are real. Also, notice how many of the girls you guys goon over in web3 today just removed all their booty photos after they got followers & attention, or deleted all the photos with themselves. If anyone’s curious, DM me — there are peeps that have all their sexy pics, even if they deleted them. 🔸Now they claim to be gamer influencers, but we also have proof that they’re completely managed by dudes ( literally the guys confessing they do everything for them ). I’m not saying all web3 females are fake, but just don’t get fooled bros, ur talking to guys not girls. 💮𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼’𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗪𝗲𝗯3, 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂. 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗽𝘂𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 — 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗼 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿🧡 ♦️Why do I make these posts? Because someone has to, so people don’t get scammed, rugged, and so on! ♦️If you’re a bit confused, go read my other posts🔻 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ♦️If you see Senpai post something, you know it’s legit. ♦️If you disagree with what I said, then I’m sorry — the truth always hurts. I probably touched your little attention-whore soft spot, and that’s why you’ll never have the balls to post the truth like some of us. You’re too afraid to harm your perfect 𝗙𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗨𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡! ♦️ BROKIES DO IT FOR THE B!TCHES! ♦️ LEGENDS HAVE B!TCHES TO DO IT FOR THEM! ♦️ I CAN RETIRE JUST WITH MY WRIST✨⌚️✨ ♦️ SENPAI WILL NOT SHILL YOUR RUGS MOFOS! 🔥𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 & 𝗮𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗮: 𝘄𝗲𝗯2 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗹𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝘁 $10𝗸 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝕏 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 𝗪𝗼𝗼𝗽 𝗪𝗼𝗼𝗽🔥 🌸𝑰 𝒉𝒐𝒑𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒆𝒏𝒋𝒐𝒚𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒍𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕 & 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒌𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒅💜 🎬𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝗕𝗡𝗢$: 🎬𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘: ⭐️𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐅𝐈𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐑 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄⭐️

🌸𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐏𝐀𝐈 先輩🍜

304,283 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I was very happy to see how enthusiastic people were about the first hand review, so here's another one. I'm using some screenshots from vision to show where I made the right play or made a mistake. This isn't a 1 to 1 solution to this exact spot, because vision has a limited number of positions so the results a merely indicative not final. A like on this post is much appreciated. We wake up with KK84ds in the big blind vs a button open. We push quite a bit of equity here vs his opening range so we elect a 3-bet. The flop comes K42r and here we have our first serious decision. Our entire 3-bet range does okay on this board, so we want to both bet our strong hands and add in quite a few bluffs. For that reason KKxx should bet here at a healthy frequency, but also blocking the 4 makes this one of the few candidates that we want to consider playing slow (screenshot 1). We check and our opponent bets, we want him to continue bluffing with air and protect our calling range, so most of the time we are calling here (screenshot 2). The turn brings a queen with our flush draw and we check, which is our first mistake. The queen is benefitial for our range (we 3-bet a lot of high cards) and the air portion of my range is gone, while he still has some air in his stabbing range. Since we have a sizeable equity advantage now, we should start betting with a lot of value and start adding in some bluffs (screenshot 3). After checking our opponent bets 50% pot and here we have yet another interesting spot. In a vacuum betting here makes a lot of money, but we want to consider all the hands that we are playing in this spot. This hand is so strong that it doesn't need that much protection and we still want our opponent to keep his air in the hand. We also want to protect our calling range here (screenshot 4). The river brings in the flush and yet another tough decision for us. We block a decent part of the board, so I still give my opponent credit for not having anything. Most if the flushes that will call my bet here, will also bet themselves when checked to. That's why I decided to check here. I was very happy with how I played this hand, but still made a crucial mistake on the turn. Even at higher stakes, people are constantly screwing up if you compare their strategy to a solver output. Knowing what the solver would do in every spot is impossible. What is possible though, is understanding the broader concepts. Understanding why the solver bets here on the turn is information that you can extrapolate in any situation that is somewhat similar. That's why is it so valuable. Hopefully you enjoyed this breakdown as much as you did with the last one. A like on this post is much appreciated. Stay tuned!
1:15

I was very happy to see how enthusiastic people were about the first hand review, so here's another one. I'm using some screenshots from vision to show where I made the right play or made a mistake. This isn't a 1 to 1 solution to this exact spot, because vision has a limited number of positions so the results a merely indicative not final. A like on this post is much appreciated. We wake up with KK84ds in the big blind vs a button open. We push quite a bit of equity here vs his opening range so we elect a 3-bet. The flop comes K42r and here we have our first serious decision. Our entire 3-bet range does okay on this board, so we want to both bet our strong hands and add in quite a few bluffs. For that reason KKxx should bet here at a healthy frequency, but also blocking the 4 makes this one of the few candidates that we want to consider playing slow (screenshot 1). We check and our opponent bets, we want him to continue bluffing with air and protect our calling range, so most of the time we are calling here (screenshot 2). The turn brings a queen with our flush draw and we check, which is our first mistake. The queen is benefitial for our range (we 3-bet a lot of high cards) and the air portion of my range is gone, while he still has some air in his stabbing range. Since we have a sizeable equity advantage now, we should start betting with a lot of value and start adding in some bluffs (screenshot 3). After checking our opponent bets 50% pot and here we have yet another interesting spot. In a vacuum betting here makes a lot of money, but we want to consider all the hands that we are playing in this spot. This hand is so strong that it doesn't need that much protection and we still want our opponent to keep his air in the hand. We also want to protect our calling range here (screenshot 4). The river brings in the flush and yet another tough decision for us. We block a decent part of the board, so I still give my opponent credit for not having anything. Most if the flushes that will call my bet here, will also bet themselves when checked to. That's why I decided to check here. I was very happy with how I played this hand, but still made a crucial mistake on the turn. Even at higher stakes, people are constantly screwing up if you compare their strategy to a solver output. Knowing what the solver would do in every spot is impossible. What is possible though, is understanding the broader concepts. Understanding why the solver bets here on the turn is information that you can extrapolate in any situation that is somewhat similar. That's why is it so valuable. Hopefully you enjoyed this breakdown as much as you did with the last one. A like on this post is much appreciated. Stay tuned!

Venividi1993

93,143 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 horrible conditions of more than 6.000 Sudanese refugees in Kumar, Ethiopia 🇪🇹 ( This morning we woke up to several phone calls on our WhatsApp hotline as usual. But this time it is a number with the country code of Ethiopia. One goes into the guess: what would someone from Ethiopia want from Refugees in Libya? But let’s answer the call! We picked up the call and someone started the conversation in an Arabic tone: “Are you David Yambio?” “Yes, I am” i told him. He goes on to introduce himself and says that they are dying and they need help. But in the meanwhile he asks “will you allow me to turn on my camera to broadcast the situation?” I tell him to wait while I ask immediately another comrade to start filming, because I don’t know what he will show me on a video call or if we will ever get in touch with him or who knows if that is the last drop of his battery 🪫. We dive into the topic, as I ask curious questions about everything possible to foster my understanding of the situation. But the bandwidth is low. I can’t see clearly what is happening, but I see throngs of people and his voice comes in and out. I tell him to rather record a short video of the circumstance and then tell me all details in a voice message via WhatsApp because that is easier in such situations. The network is still dropping and I am so lost, that I haven’t convened the right message and at the same time I wonder if I raised his expectations for a rescue by asking him to record a short video. The call ends and I immediately sent him a voice message, explaining in details what I need to know: the location, what is happening, when did they leave Sudan and who is there helping on the ground, the UNHCR? The government? Charity organisations? I ask for anything that could help us understand the situation and who to target. It is more that two minutes that the message has been delivered, but in my WhatsApp status it indicates that he hasn’t seen the message yet. I am lost and mad because I couldn’t help, I wondered if I will ever hear from him again and if not, what will happen to the thousands of people that I saw in that video call? I went out to get some fruits for breakfast but every minute I check my phone as messages pop up but none is from that stranger from Ethiopia. in between, I receive two calls from Libya but I tell them that I will call them in a few minutes, because in my head I am hoping that the person stuck in a desperate situation in Ethiopia will call and he would find the line busy? I did the shopping and immediately went home, but I can’t sit or start my breakfast as I move up and down in my room. I ask my comrade “what if the person doesn’t call back? How do we reach him? What do they want from Refugees in Libya? What if they send us the video we requested for, what will we do with it?” “We can ring an alarm 🚨?” I asked while feeling disappointed. A few more minutes passed and messages started to pop in: desperate faces, many more hundreds in one picture, signposts and banners about the situation at Kumar camp in Ethiopia ( In the pictures are persons wearing jackets with the UNHCR logo and I immediately tell myself that at least they will be helped. I insist for a video, because for me it would be easier to understand what is happening. He tells me, “be patient because our network is slow and the video is loading”. Finally after 6 minutes, the video arrives and I am shocked. But what do I tell him: a “thank you”? “I will do something about your situation?” “I will report about it?” I found out that in my head was this tag of war between choices and approaches to such miserable conditions. 1/3
0:48

🚨 horrible conditions of more than 6.000 Sudanese refugees in Kumar, Ethiopia 🇪🇹 ( This morning we woke up to several phone calls on our WhatsApp hotline as usual. But this time it is a number with the country code of Ethiopia. One goes into the guess: what would someone from Ethiopia want from Refugees in Libya? But let’s answer the call! We picked up the call and someone started the conversation in an Arabic tone: “Are you David Yambio?” “Yes, I am” i told him. He goes on to introduce himself and says that they are dying and they need help. But in the meanwhile he asks “will you allow me to turn on my camera to broadcast the situation?” I tell him to wait while I ask immediately another comrade to start filming, because I don’t know what he will show me on a video call or if we will ever get in touch with him or who knows if that is the last drop of his battery 🪫. We dive into the topic, as I ask curious questions about everything possible to foster my understanding of the situation. But the bandwidth is low. I can’t see clearly what is happening, but I see throngs of people and his voice comes in and out. I tell him to rather record a short video of the circumstance and then tell me all details in a voice message via WhatsApp because that is easier in such situations. The network is still dropping and I am so lost, that I haven’t convened the right message and at the same time I wonder if I raised his expectations for a rescue by asking him to record a short video. The call ends and I immediately sent him a voice message, explaining in details what I need to know: the location, what is happening, when did they leave Sudan and who is there helping on the ground, the UNHCR? The government? Charity organisations? I ask for anything that could help us understand the situation and who to target. It is more that two minutes that the message has been delivered, but in my WhatsApp status it indicates that he hasn’t seen the message yet. I am lost and mad because I couldn’t help, I wondered if I will ever hear from him again and if not, what will happen to the thousands of people that I saw in that video call? I went out to get some fruits for breakfast but every minute I check my phone as messages pop up but none is from that stranger from Ethiopia. in between, I receive two calls from Libya but I tell them that I will call them in a few minutes, because in my head I am hoping that the person stuck in a desperate situation in Ethiopia will call and he would find the line busy? I did the shopping and immediately went home, but I can’t sit or start my breakfast as I move up and down in my room. I ask my comrade “what if the person doesn’t call back? How do we reach him? What do they want from Refugees in Libya? What if they send us the video we requested for, what will we do with it?” “We can ring an alarm 🚨?” I asked while feeling disappointed. A few more minutes passed and messages started to pop in: desperate faces, many more hundreds in one picture, signposts and banners about the situation at Kumar camp in Ethiopia ( In the pictures are persons wearing jackets with the UNHCR logo and I immediately tell myself that at least they will be helped. I insist for a video, because for me it would be easier to understand what is happening. He tells me, “be patient because our network is slow and the video is loading”. Finally after 6 minutes, the video arrives and I am shocked. But what do I tell him: a “thank you”? “I will do something about your situation?” “I will report about it?” I found out that in my head was this tag of war between choices and approaches to such miserable conditions. 1/3

Refugees In Libya

12,701 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

#JuniorMarkConcertD3 #filmracha #NamtanFilm J: As a sister... 🤣🤣🤣 J: As a sister. M: I know, I know. J: Like a sis, like a sis. I love N’Film the most in the world as a sis. N’Film is like the brightness/joy during my practice. You too. (Mark) J: N’Film is... honestly, speaking about this show, when I requested it, it was under the same conditions as the first 2-3 calls... I asked her to be a guest right from the beginning and was really worried she’d be exhausted. But I genuinely wanted to see N’Film perform this show. This was very personal for me. ❤️‍🩹: Thank you ka 🥰🙏🏼 J: So I told the team that if we couldn't get "Rockstar" by Lisa, I wouldn't bring N’Film on, because I didn't want her to get too tired. ❤️‍🩹: Whoa... I was so stressed out, you know... Like, super stressed. But no, no, it's fine, it's fine! I just wanted the performance with P'Joo and P'Mark to turn out great and go smoothly all the way, so I was really scared and anxious. J: Actually, I've been following Blush Blossom for 2 years now, and I've always been impressed by N’Film's work, in whatever role/capacity. ❤️‍🩹: Thank you so much. J: Both performance-wise... What do they call N’Film again? "30th Floor Hips", right? Is that the nickname? ❤️‍🩹: Something like that, I guess... You're terrible, Phi 🫪🤣🤣🤣 J: Well, everyone can see it! Everyone likes... People often talk about... how she has immense charisma and is such a great performer. So I wanted to design a show for her. I felt like we've seen N’Film in sparkly/diamond-studded modes a lot already, or in that mode... what was it that you like to do with Namtan? Like a Mor Lam vibe. ❤️‍🩹: *Covers her face with her hands* J: I've seen that a lot, so I wanted to see N’Film in a cool, edgy mode for a change. Plus, I felt like you wouldn't get to see this anywhere else anytime soon, so I wanted her to show this at the concert—mostly because I personally wanted to watch it myself. ❤️‍🩹: 🤣🤣🤣 J: And well, I was being mischievous. I tricked Film by saying, "N’Film, I'm going to have you show 'Rockstar', okay?" ❤️‍🩹: No! Oh wait, no! At first, you didn't even tell me the song title! At first, you said I just needed to stand there looking pretty and do nothing at all. "But Film, you're so pretty! Just come stand there, you don't have to do much." J: "Just stand there looking pretty, perform comfortably and easily." ❤️‍🩹: "No need to memorize much." J: "No need to memorize much." But turns out, there isn't a single Thai word in it, and there isn't a single moment where you stop moving 🤣🤣🤣 ❤️‍🩹: But it's good, it's good! I wanted... I wanted the whole performance to turn out great. I hope everyone likes it; I really gave it my all. ❤️‍🩹: Also, I want to say that P'Joo worked super hard practicing. On days when it was just me practicing alone, P'Joo would always make time to come practice with me. So impressive. J: Do you know why? Because I couldn't leave N’Film to practice alone. N’Film was the guest who requested the most rehearsal slots! Like... so many that I felt like adding 4-5 more songs for her. I wanted us to practice a lot, but I was afraid N’Film would get too tired. Thank you so much, N’Film, for... yeah ❤️‍🩹: So impressive, so impressive! I've never seen P'Joo dance before either, so I was super surprised. You picked up the choreography so fast! There was a day P'Joo had to rehearse other songs and then came straight to practice with me. So... so capable. And I'm really happy. I'm not stressed anymore! J: You did great... I love N’Film so much. Well, uh... I don't know what else to say, but I love N’Film so much and I'm so glad. You look so beautiful today, and so cool. Give it up for N’Film, everyone! 🫨🫨🫨👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 ❤️‍🩹: Thank you na kaaa 🙏🏼🥰
3:52

#JuniorMarkConcertD3 #filmracha #NamtanFilm J: As a sister... 🤣🤣🤣 J: As a sister. M: I know, I know. J: Like a sis, like a sis. I love N’Film the most in the world as a sis. N’Film is like the brightness/joy during my practice. You too. (Mark) J: N’Film is... honestly, speaking about this show, when I requested it, it was under the same conditions as the first 2-3 calls... I asked her to be a guest right from the beginning and was really worried she’d be exhausted. But I genuinely wanted to see N’Film perform this show. This was very personal for me. ❤️‍🩹: Thank you ka 🥰🙏🏼 J: So I told the team that if we couldn't get "Rockstar" by Lisa, I wouldn't bring N’Film on, because I didn't want her to get too tired. ❤️‍🩹: Whoa... I was so stressed out, you know... Like, super stressed. But no, no, it's fine, it's fine! I just wanted the performance with P'Joo and P'Mark to turn out great and go smoothly all the way, so I was really scared and anxious. J: Actually, I've been following Blush Blossom for 2 years now, and I've always been impressed by N’Film's work, in whatever role/capacity. ❤️‍🩹: Thank you so much. J: Both performance-wise... What do they call N’Film again? "30th Floor Hips", right? Is that the nickname? ❤️‍🩹: Something like that, I guess... You're terrible, Phi 🫪🤣🤣🤣 J: Well, everyone can see it! Everyone likes... People often talk about... how she has immense charisma and is such a great performer. So I wanted to design a show for her. I felt like we've seen N’Film in sparkly/diamond-studded modes a lot already, or in that mode... what was it that you like to do with Namtan? Like a Mor Lam vibe. ❤️‍🩹: *Covers her face with her hands* J: I've seen that a lot, so I wanted to see N’Film in a cool, edgy mode for a change. Plus, I felt like you wouldn't get to see this anywhere else anytime soon, so I wanted her to show this at the concert—mostly because I personally wanted to watch it myself. ❤️‍🩹: 🤣🤣🤣 J: And well, I was being mischievous. I tricked Film by saying, "N’Film, I'm going to have you show 'Rockstar', okay?" ❤️‍🩹: No! Oh wait, no! At first, you didn't even tell me the song title! At first, you said I just needed to stand there looking pretty and do nothing at all. "But Film, you're so pretty! Just come stand there, you don't have to do much." J: "Just stand there looking pretty, perform comfortably and easily." ❤️‍🩹: "No need to memorize much." J: "No need to memorize much." But turns out, there isn't a single Thai word in it, and there isn't a single moment where you stop moving 🤣🤣🤣 ❤️‍🩹: But it's good, it's good! I wanted... I wanted the whole performance to turn out great. I hope everyone likes it; I really gave it my all. ❤️‍🩹: Also, I want to say that P'Joo worked super hard practicing. On days when it was just me practicing alone, P'Joo would always make time to come practice with me. So impressive. J: Do you know why? Because I couldn't leave N’Film to practice alone. N’Film was the guest who requested the most rehearsal slots! Like... so many that I felt like adding 4-5 more songs for her. I wanted us to practice a lot, but I was afraid N’Film would get too tired. Thank you so much, N’Film, for... yeah ❤️‍🩹: So impressive, so impressive! I've never seen P'Joo dance before either, so I was super surprised. You picked up the choreography so fast! There was a day P'Joo had to rehearse other songs and then came straight to practice with me. So... so capable. And I'm really happy. I'm not stressed anymore! J: You did great... I love N’Film so much. Well, uh... I don't know what else to say, but I love N’Film so much and I'm so glad. You look so beautiful today, and so cool. Give it up for N’Film, everyone! 🫨🫨🫨👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 ❤️‍🩹: Thank you na kaaa 🙏🏼🥰

แมวแมวเอง

45,833 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

HOW TO MAKE $50K/MONTH SELLING MANAGED AI AGENTS (FULL COURSE) The model: sell managed AI agents to businesses for $5K/month each. You handle the infrastructure, they get an employee that never sleeps. 10 clients puts you at $50K MRR with 85%+ margins, run entirely by you and a fleet of agents. Nick Vasilescu is doing exactly this, and he came on the pod to walk through the whole playbook. Here's what I learned: 1. The arbitrage is that nobody knows this is possible. 99% of business owners are still asking ChatGPT what the weather is. One working agent hooks them on the spot. 2. Sell abundance. Unlimited agents, unlimited infrastructure. They don't care what an MCP is, they care that their problem is gone. 3. Don't niche too early. Say yes to everyone and let the market pull you. You find the niche by doing reps, not guessing. 4. Paid audit into managed service. Charge $1K to map every automation opportunity, then credit it toward month one. Qualifies the lead, makes the upsell a no-brainer. 5. First call, don't sell. Record it, map the workflow tip to tail, find the automation with the most value and least effort. Start there. 6. The stack is Hermes + Composio + Orgo. Composio connects all their apps in one click. Orgo spins up a working Hermes agent in 26 seconds. 7. Productize with a golden snapshot. Build one perfect agent, clone it, and every copy comes over one for one with auth intact. 8. Turn client call transcripts into skills in 10 minutes. Feed the recording to Claude Code, write the skill, port it to the client's agent via Orgo MCP. 9. Watchdogs make you look elite. Get alerted before the client notices anything broke. "Already fixed it" is why they keep paying you. 10. You become their guy. You drive more outcomes than their own employees, they credit every win to you, and churn drops to almost nothing. His 2 key takeaways: 1. Bet on cost going to zero. They launched unlimited tokens when it was barely profitable because they knew they'd capture the spread. Build for where the puck is going. 2. One client every six weeks gets you to $600K a year. The model isn't hard, it's just unevenly executed. That's the entire opportunity. Nick is crushing this model and we had a blast diving deep on how you can do the same. Go follow Nick Vasilescu Full video below. (Also available on the Build With AI podcast wherever you get your pods)
47:49

HOW TO MAKE $50K/MONTH SELLING MANAGED AI AGENTS (FULL COURSE) The model: sell managed AI agents to businesses for $5K/month each. You handle the infrastructure, they get an employee that never sleeps. 10 clients puts you at $50K MRR with 85%+ margins, run entirely by you and a fleet of agents. Nick Vasilescu is doing exactly this, and he came on the pod to walk through the whole playbook. Here's what I learned: 1. The arbitrage is that nobody knows this is possible. 99% of business owners are still asking ChatGPT what the weather is. One working agent hooks them on the spot. 2. Sell abundance. Unlimited agents, unlimited infrastructure. They don't care what an MCP is, they care that their problem is gone. 3. Don't niche too early. Say yes to everyone and let the market pull you. You find the niche by doing reps, not guessing. 4. Paid audit into managed service. Charge $1K to map every automation opportunity, then credit it toward month one. Qualifies the lead, makes the upsell a no-brainer. 5. First call, don't sell. Record it, map the workflow tip to tail, find the automation with the most value and least effort. Start there. 6. The stack is Hermes + Composio + Orgo. Composio connects all their apps in one click. Orgo spins up a working Hermes agent in 26 seconds. 7. Productize with a golden snapshot. Build one perfect agent, clone it, and every copy comes over one for one with auth intact. 8. Turn client call transcripts into skills in 10 minutes. Feed the recording to Claude Code, write the skill, port it to the client's agent via Orgo MCP. 9. Watchdogs make you look elite. Get alerted before the client notices anything broke. "Already fixed it" is why they keep paying you. 10. You become their guy. You drive more outcomes than their own employees, they credit every win to you, and churn drops to almost nothing. His 2 key takeaways: 1. Bet on cost going to zero. They launched unlimited tokens when it was barely profitable because they knew they'd capture the spread. Build for where the puck is going. 2. One client every six weeks gets you to $600K a year. The model isn't hard, it's just unevenly executed. That's the entire opportunity. Nick is crushing this model and we had a blast diving deep on how you can do the same. Go follow Nick Vasilescu Full video below. (Also available on the Build With AI podcast wherever you get your pods)

Corey Ganim

85,412 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Post 🇫🇷 & 🇺🇸 🇫🇷🚨📣 IMPORTANT & INCONTOURNABLE‼️ #Le11septembre ? Un événement créé pour INSTAURER la peur, JUSTIFIER la surveillance de masse et VERROUILLER notre soumission…‼️ ⚠️ S’il y a bien une vidéo à ne pas manquer c’est CELLE-CI. A VOIR jusqu’au bout. Une COMPILATION que j’ai TRADUITE et qui rassemble l’ESSENTIEL de ce qu’ils ont voulu nous CACHER…🔥Extraits CHOC et preuves IRRÉFUTABLES. #CIA , Mossad, explosifs… qu’ils ne veulent surtout pas que vous sachiez. (Crédit 🎥 ) Souvenez-vous d’Aaron Russo, lanceur d’alerte et producteur américain engagé, mort en 2007. Dans une interview avec Alex Jones, il raconte comment Nick Rockefeller lui aurait révélé, avant les faits, les plans derrière le 9/11, la guerre contre le terrorisme, et le projet de contrôle des populations via puces RFID. Vidéo complète avec sous-titres ICI ➡️ ou ➡️ Et maintenant, regardez ce que fait Trump. Il EXPOSE, il NÉGOCIE avant de RÉFORMER en profondeur le système. Objectif : Fin de la FED, de l’IRS, abolition de l’esclavage bancaire et moderne. Pour ceux qui s’impatientent, notamment pour la déclassification d’Epstein, ne perdez pas de vue ceci : Trump agit méthodiquement et chronologiquement. RIEN n’est anodin. Pas besoin de discours, les FAITS sont LÀ. Trump est de retour depuis juste trois mois… et ses actions parlent déjà pour lui. Il agit POUR le PEUPLE. Rappels de mes précédentes publications : 1/♦️Le 11 Septembre. LE plus grand SCANDALE de l’histoire américaine ? ➡️ 2/ ♦️Le 11 septembre. Les vidéos INTERDITES ➡️ 3/ ♦️Quels MERDIAS OSERONT DIFFUSER CECI ? #Kadhafi - Ben Laden - 11septembre - Trump - General Flynn … ➡️ 4/♦️ Trump sait… ➡️ 🇺🇸🚨📣 IMPORTANT & UNMISSABLE‼️ 9/11? An event orchestrated to ESTABLISH fear, JUSTIFY mass surveillance, and ENSURE our submission…‼️ ⚠️ If there’s ONE video you can’t miss, it’s THIS ONE. WATCH it till the end. A COMPILATION I TRANSLATED that brings together the ESSENTIAL TRUTHS they’ve tried to HIDE from us… 🔥SHOCKING clips and UNDENIABLE evidence. CIA, Mossad, explosives… the kind of stuff they really don’t want you to know. (Credit 🎥 ) Remember Aaron Russo, the American whistleblower and engaged producer, who passed away in 2007. In an interview with Alex Jones , he reveals how Nick Rockefeller had disclosed to him, before the events, the plans behind 9/11, the war on terror, and the population control project via RFID chips. Full video with subtitles HERE ➡️ or ➡️ And now, look at what #Trump is doing. He EXPOSES, he NEGOTIATES before REFORMING the system in depth. The goal: End the FED, the IRS, abolish banking slavery and modern-day slavery. For those who are impatient, especially about the #Epstein declassification, keep in mind this: Trump is acting methodically and chronologically. NOTHING is random. No need for long speeches, the FACTS are HERE. Donald J. Trump has been back for three months… and his actions speak for him. He acts FOR THE PEOPLE. Reminders of my previous posts: 1/ ♦️ 9/11. THE biggest SCANDAL in American history? 📌Link 1 Above ⬆️ 2/ ♦️ 9/11. The FORBIDDEN videos. 📌Link 2 Above ⬆️ 3/ ♦️ Which FAKE NEWS mainstream media will have the guts to show THIS? #Gaddafi - BinLaden - 9/11 - Trump #GeneralFlynn 📌Link 3 Above ⬆️ 4/ ♦️ Trump knows… 📌Link 4 Above ⬆️ 🇺🇸🦅🇫🇷 Sylvia Miami 🇫🇷🦅🇺🇸 🔴 Tous mes liens en un seul clic, suivez-moi / All my links in one click, follow me ✅ Elon Musk General Mike Flynn #sylviamiami #News #USA #Mossad #EpsteinFiles #Gelatin #Israel #Sionisme #DémolitionContrôlée #Censure #September11 #AmericanScandal #ControlledDemolition #Censorship #AlexJones #tuckercarlson #Rockefeller #DeepState #Whistleblower #EndTheFED #FED #IRS #BankingSlavery #DickCheney #BenLaden #BinLaden
26:07

Post 🇫🇷 & 🇺🇸 🇫🇷🚨📣 IMPORTANT & INCONTOURNABLE‼️ #Le11septembre ? Un événement créé pour INSTAURER la peur, JUSTIFIER la surveillance de masse et VERROUILLER notre soumission…‼️ ⚠️ S’il y a bien une vidéo à ne pas manquer c’est CELLE-CI. A VOIR jusqu’au bout. Une COMPILATION que j’ai TRADUITE et qui rassemble l’ESSENTIEL de ce qu’ils ont voulu nous CACHER…🔥Extraits CHOC et preuves IRRÉFUTABLES. #CIA , Mossad, explosifs… qu’ils ne veulent surtout pas que vous sachiez. (Crédit 🎥 ) Souvenez-vous d’Aaron Russo, lanceur d’alerte et producteur américain engagé, mort en 2007. Dans une interview avec Alex Jones, il raconte comment Nick Rockefeller lui aurait révélé, avant les faits, les plans derrière le 9/11, la guerre contre le terrorisme, et le projet de contrôle des populations via puces RFID. Vidéo complète avec sous-titres ICI ➡️ ou ➡️ Et maintenant, regardez ce que fait Trump. Il EXPOSE, il NÉGOCIE avant de RÉFORMER en profondeur le système. Objectif : Fin de la FED, de l’IRS, abolition de l’esclavage bancaire et moderne. Pour ceux qui s’impatientent, notamment pour la déclassification d’Epstein, ne perdez pas de vue ceci : Trump agit méthodiquement et chronologiquement. RIEN n’est anodin. Pas besoin de discours, les FAITS sont LÀ. Trump est de retour depuis juste trois mois… et ses actions parlent déjà pour lui. Il agit POUR le PEUPLE. Rappels de mes précédentes publications : 1/♦️Le 11 Septembre. LE plus grand SCANDALE de l’histoire américaine ? ➡️ 2/ ♦️Le 11 septembre. Les vidéos INTERDITES ➡️ 3/ ♦️Quels MERDIAS OSERONT DIFFUSER CECI ? #Kadhafi - Ben Laden - 11septembre - Trump - General Flynn … ➡️ 4/♦️ Trump sait… ➡️ 🇺🇸🚨📣 IMPORTANT & UNMISSABLE‼️ 9/11? An event orchestrated to ESTABLISH fear, JUSTIFY mass surveillance, and ENSURE our submission…‼️ ⚠️ If there’s ONE video you can’t miss, it’s THIS ONE. WATCH it till the end. A COMPILATION I TRANSLATED that brings together the ESSENTIAL TRUTHS they’ve tried to HIDE from us… 🔥SHOCKING clips and UNDENIABLE evidence. CIA, Mossad, explosives… the kind of stuff they really don’t want you to know. (Credit 🎥 ) Remember Aaron Russo, the American whistleblower and engaged producer, who passed away in 2007. In an interview with Alex Jones , he reveals how Nick Rockefeller had disclosed to him, before the events, the plans behind 9/11, the war on terror, and the population control project via RFID chips. Full video with subtitles HERE ➡️ or ➡️ And now, look at what #Trump is doing. He EXPOSES, he NEGOTIATES before REFORMING the system in depth. The goal: End the FED, the IRS, abolish banking slavery and modern-day slavery. For those who are impatient, especially about the #Epstein declassification, keep in mind this: Trump is acting methodically and chronologically. NOTHING is random. No need for long speeches, the FACTS are HERE. Donald J. Trump has been back for three months… and his actions speak for him. He acts FOR THE PEOPLE. Reminders of my previous posts: 1/ ♦️ 9/11. THE biggest SCANDAL in American history? 📌Link 1 Above ⬆️ 2/ ♦️ 9/11. The FORBIDDEN videos. 📌Link 2 Above ⬆️ 3/ ♦️ Which FAKE NEWS mainstream media will have the guts to show THIS? #Gaddafi - BinLaden - 9/11 - Trump #GeneralFlynn 📌Link 3 Above ⬆️ 4/ ♦️ Trump knows… 📌Link 4 Above ⬆️ 🇺🇸🦅🇫🇷 Sylvia Miami 🇫🇷🦅🇺🇸 🔴 Tous mes liens en un seul clic, suivez-moi / All my links in one click, follow me ✅ Elon Musk General Mike Flynn #sylviamiami #News #USA #Mossad #EpsteinFiles #Gelatin #Israel #Sionisme #DémolitionContrôlée #Censure #September11 #AmericanScandal #ControlledDemolition #Censorship #AlexJones #tuckercarlson #Rockefeller #DeepState #Whistleblower #EndTheFED #FED #IRS #BankingSlavery #DickCheney #BenLaden #BinLaden

Sylvia Miami

55,154 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

If you're an Amazon India customer, take 2 mins to read this if your money is dear to you. TLDR version, Amazon delivery partners are literally scamming customers. And Amazon India will do nothing to help you in this situation. Kiss your money goodbye! I raised this concern on social media a few days back, for a product (Levi's jeans) which was marked as delivered but I never received it. Their customer support team, did some investigation and came to the conclusion that the product was indeed delivered. Hence, they cannot do anything more to assist me in this situation (refer image) This was not a OTP based delivery, and neither does Amazon mention the name of the person who received the product on their app/website. If it was OTP based delivery, I would know someone has given the OTP so delivery has happened. With a name, at least I would know if there's any person with that name in the house. Now, I have absolutely no way to confirm if Amazon genuinely delivered the product. Except video camera evidence. So I went to see the CCTV footage of the day and time the product was marked as delivered. In the CCTV footage, I see something very strange. The Amazon delivery partner arrives at my place, gets off the bike, takes out the product and for the next couple of mins just keeps doing something on his phone. He doesn't call me, or at least I don't have any call record of calls at that time. In the meanwhile, another person walking out closes the door. That person is not me, neither works for me and neither known to me. Likely associated with a neighbour/tenant and I have no such instructions for my Amazon account for deliveries to be left with anyone else. One minute later the Amazon delivery partner decides to leave (see screenshot). The delivery partner doesn't even enter the house and just leaves after a couple of mins. Without even entering the house, Amazon successfully delivered the product! Wow! And if the delivery partner handed the product to any random person walking out of the house, is that the customer's problem? Was this a very expensive product? No, not at all. So why am I spending all this time to write this? 1. I just want to spread awareness to everyone out there who might be getting scammed by such malpractices from Amazon / delivery partners. 2. If Amazon claims a product is delivered, you can't do nothing about it. Irrespective of whether the product was actually delivered or not. Your money is gone, poof! 3. It should be the company's responsibility to prove that a product was successfully delivered but in India it seems anyone can walk over their customers. 4. I'm shocked that a customer has to go to these lengths to uncover such scams in India 5. If ordering on Amazon, I will always select cash on delivery as the default going forward Amazon India - Do not contact me in hope that I will delete this tweet or evidence now! PS: Video doesn't have the date/time stamp as aspect ratio has been cropped. Will only share that with company officials if someone from Amazon wants to see it. Or with consumer courts if I decide to pursue this further, definitely not worth my time for now. But in the US, I would have definitely filed a lawsuit for millions.
3:05

If you're an Amazon India customer, take 2 mins to read this if your money is dear to you. TLDR version, Amazon delivery partners are literally scamming customers. And Amazon India will do nothing to help you in this situation. Kiss your money goodbye! I raised this concern on social media a few days back, for a product (Levi's jeans) which was marked as delivered but I never received it. Their customer support team, did some investigation and came to the conclusion that the product was indeed delivered. Hence, they cannot do anything more to assist me in this situation (refer image) This was not a OTP based delivery, and neither does Amazon mention the name of the person who received the product on their app/website. If it was OTP based delivery, I would know someone has given the OTP so delivery has happened. With a name, at least I would know if there's any person with that name in the house. Now, I have absolutely no way to confirm if Amazon genuinely delivered the product. Except video camera evidence. So I went to see the CCTV footage of the day and time the product was marked as delivered. In the CCTV footage, I see something very strange. The Amazon delivery partner arrives at my place, gets off the bike, takes out the product and for the next couple of mins just keeps doing something on his phone. He doesn't call me, or at least I don't have any call record of calls at that time. In the meanwhile, another person walking out closes the door. That person is not me, neither works for me and neither known to me. Likely associated with a neighbour/tenant and I have no such instructions for my Amazon account for deliveries to be left with anyone else. One minute later the Amazon delivery partner decides to leave (see screenshot). The delivery partner doesn't even enter the house and just leaves after a couple of mins. Without even entering the house, Amazon successfully delivered the product! Wow! And if the delivery partner handed the product to any random person walking out of the house, is that the customer's problem? Was this a very expensive product? No, not at all. So why am I spending all this time to write this? 1. I just want to spread awareness to everyone out there who might be getting scammed by such malpractices from Amazon / delivery partners. 2. If Amazon claims a product is delivered, you can't do nothing about it. Irrespective of whether the product was actually delivered or not. Your money is gone, poof! 3. It should be the company's responsibility to prove that a product was successfully delivered but in India it seems anyone can walk over their customers. 4. I'm shocked that a customer has to go to these lengths to uncover such scams in India 5. If ordering on Amazon, I will always select cash on delivery as the default going forward Amazon India - Do not contact me in hope that I will delete this tweet or evidence now! PS: Video doesn't have the date/time stamp as aspect ratio has been cropped. Will only share that with company officials if someone from Amazon wants to see it. Or with consumer courts if I decide to pursue this further, definitely not worth my time for now. But in the US, I would have definitely filed a lawsuit for millions.

Gurjot Ahluwalia

12,416 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

I made this product launch video over the weekend with just prompts It's all vibe coded There's something you should know, though: Like everyone else, a few days ago my timeline started getting full of videos like this when Remotion launched their Claude skill, so I decided to give it a go I was captivated by all the examples, so I started like everyone was saying: "just write a prompt" I typed the prompt, and it created an extremely bland, untasteful, stock-looking video 10 prompts in and it was not getting better. It was very, very bland. But at least it was something, so I kept going at it I ended up spending my entire weekend on this, 2-3 days of work. Only to realize my original reference videos that inspired me to get started were all fake Everyone was outright lying about their results. They all claimed "I made this with just one prompt", but it was just bait, they didn't really use Remotion or code at all, it was just a normal, human-made motion video Then you expand the X post and read the replies and they're all like "haha joke" in the comments, but their main post already got 1.5 million views and bamboozled everyone who didn't read further And this is a problem: when a viral trend happens, these posts flood your timeline, and you only realize that they're all noise and bait (and that they haven't even used the tools they claim) when you click through the post and read its comments. But 90% of people (like me, initially) just see the post on their timeline while scrolling, and assume it's all real. You don't go in to check every single post you see: you just like it, or save it for later, and carry on with your day, thinking what you saw was the real thing, and that it's all outstanding results, and that motion designers are really done And it's so anxiety inducing, because everyone is hyping their results, but most of it is just not true. I have stopped reading X lately because going in makes me so anxious, everyone is claiming extraordinary outlier results just for the views and clicks, and you feel like you're lagging behind and you're not good enough because you don't get those results So for this video I decided to actually take the tech out for a spin, and see what results I could really get out of it I used Remotion and Claude Code 4.5, but contrary to what everyone was claiming, this video was not "just a prompt". It was fully vibe coded, but it required much more than a prompt. It was multiple days worth of work Here's what I learned: - Making vibe coded videos with Remotion is ~10-20x slower than building app code. I've been wasting my Claude limits on this video - Everything takes a lot of manual work and reprompting. You often need to go frame by frame correcting tiny things - It makes very silly mistakes - Even Opus 4.5 has very very limited knowledge of spatial / visual things. It doesn't understand well z-indexes, layers, compositions, proportions, temporal coherence, etc. Claude Code feels extremely dumb when creating code for Remotion videos, which surprised me a lot, beacuse I had been mind blown by how incredibly well it worked with my Ruby on Rails SaaS codebases - You need to have some design knowledge to adjust things manually, you need to ask for exactly what you want, in the technical jargon it expects. You can't just say "make this more beautiful" or "animate this better" because it just creates slop - Right now vibe coded videos are promising, but I think I could have done this video faster just by doing it manually in After Effects. It really took that much work - If you have a creative idea for something you want to animate, it takes multiple hours of back and forth prompting to create just one or two seconds worth of **good** animation - Tip: PARAMETERIZE everything! It tends to hardcode magic numbers everywhere in the code, so if you change something earlier in the video timeline, everything else breaks. You want to essentially be creating "key frames" with code by telling it to parameterize every frame where something important happens, and calculate the rest of the keyframes based off that. This comes in handy when you need, for example, to adjust keyframes to match the music So in summary: vibe coded videos are promising, but right now it only works for very stock-looking videos unless you put in a ton of effort Maybe actually useful for 1-2 second web animations though, I'll try that next It will obviously get better, this feels like the quality of code generation in 2023-2024, you need to hold its hand and correct it at every step along the way. But even if video code generation was better, you would still need someone with motion design knowledge to at least set the creative direction, lay out the overall script and composition, etc. It's not completely hands-off unless you want slop And a word on caution: especially here on X, there's 90% hype and 10% reality, nothing is what it seems. Do not believe what you see online, people are constantly baiting and then just laughing it off in the comments
0:28

I made this product launch video over the weekend with just prompts It's all vibe coded There's something you should know, though: Like everyone else, a few days ago my timeline started getting full of videos like this when Remotion launched their Claude skill, so I decided to give it a go I was captivated by all the examples, so I started like everyone was saying: "just write a prompt" I typed the prompt, and it created an extremely bland, untasteful, stock-looking video 10 prompts in and it was not getting better. It was very, very bland. But at least it was something, so I kept going at it I ended up spending my entire weekend on this, 2-3 days of work. Only to realize my original reference videos that inspired me to get started were all fake Everyone was outright lying about their results. They all claimed "I made this with just one prompt", but it was just bait, they didn't really use Remotion or code at all, it was just a normal, human-made motion video Then you expand the X post and read the replies and they're all like "haha joke" in the comments, but their main post already got 1.5 million views and bamboozled everyone who didn't read further And this is a problem: when a viral trend happens, these posts flood your timeline, and you only realize that they're all noise and bait (and that they haven't even used the tools they claim) when you click through the post and read its comments. But 90% of people (like me, initially) just see the post on their timeline while scrolling, and assume it's all real. You don't go in to check every single post you see: you just like it, or save it for later, and carry on with your day, thinking what you saw was the real thing, and that it's all outstanding results, and that motion designers are really done And it's so anxiety inducing, because everyone is hyping their results, but most of it is just not true. I have stopped reading X lately because going in makes me so anxious, everyone is claiming extraordinary outlier results just for the views and clicks, and you feel like you're lagging behind and you're not good enough because you don't get those results So for this video I decided to actually take the tech out for a spin, and see what results I could really get out of it I used Remotion and Claude Code 4.5, but contrary to what everyone was claiming, this video was not "just a prompt". It was fully vibe coded, but it required much more than a prompt. It was multiple days worth of work Here's what I learned: - Making vibe coded videos with Remotion is ~10-20x slower than building app code. I've been wasting my Claude limits on this video - Everything takes a lot of manual work and reprompting. You often need to go frame by frame correcting tiny things - It makes very silly mistakes - Even Opus 4.5 has very very limited knowledge of spatial / visual things. It doesn't understand well z-indexes, layers, compositions, proportions, temporal coherence, etc. Claude Code feels extremely dumb when creating code for Remotion videos, which surprised me a lot, beacuse I had been mind blown by how incredibly well it worked with my Ruby on Rails SaaS codebases - You need to have some design knowledge to adjust things manually, you need to ask for exactly what you want, in the technical jargon it expects. You can't just say "make this more beautiful" or "animate this better" because it just creates slop - Right now vibe coded videos are promising, but I think I could have done this video faster just by doing it manually in After Effects. It really took that much work - If you have a creative idea for something you want to animate, it takes multiple hours of back and forth prompting to create just one or two seconds worth of **good** animation - Tip: PARAMETERIZE everything! It tends to hardcode magic numbers everywhere in the code, so if you change something earlier in the video timeline, everything else breaks. You want to essentially be creating "key frames" with code by telling it to parameterize every frame where something important happens, and calculate the rest of the keyframes based off that. This comes in handy when you need, for example, to adjust keyframes to match the music So in summary: vibe coded videos are promising, but right now it only works for very stock-looking videos unless you put in a ton of effort Maybe actually useful for 1-2 second web animations though, I'll try that next It will obviously get better, this feels like the quality of code generation in 2023-2024, you need to hold its hand and correct it at every step along the way. But even if video code generation was better, you would still need someone with motion design knowledge to at least set the creative direction, lay out the overall script and composition, etc. It's not completely hands-off unless you want slop And a word on caution: especially here on X, there's 90% hype and 10% reality, nothing is what it seems. Do not believe what you see online, people are constantly baiting and then just laughing it off in the comments

Javi

312,375 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

#NamtanFilm #น้ำตาลฟิล์ม (I used google and ai translations for some of the questions, so they might not be 100% accurate) Q1: Is there any chance we’ll get to see a travel vlog from you two in the future? ❤️‍🩹: Possible 🤍: There's a chance. Q2: What’s your MBTI? ❤️‍🩹: Mine is still the same. 🤍: Mine has changed. What is it? ❤️‍🩹: ESTJ. 🤍: Yes. ❤️‍🩹: Mine is still INFP. Q3: When was the last time you found your partner cute? 🤍: All the time, because she approaches me more. ❤️‍🩹: Mine is... when Phi brings me stuff/goodies. She’s like, “This is yours. This is also yours.” Q4: Which city in China do you want to visit? 🤍: EVERY CITY! ❤️‍🩹: Every city. 🤍: Cuz when we go there, it’s only for work. We don’t have time to explore. I want to go to every city. I want to find something delicious to eat. ❤️‍🩹: Yes, and we haven’t been there for almost a year now. 🤍: Yeah, I miss it. I want to go to several cities, and new cities we haven’t been to yet. ❤️‍🩹: Oh! I want to go to this city. What’s the city that has pandas? 🤍: Chengdu. ❤️‍🩹: Chengdu! Q5: What do you do with each other when you feel your heart flutter? A. Pat on the head / B. Hold hands / C. Hug 🤍: Hold hands. ❤️‍🩹: Yes, hold hands. Q6: If you were to give each other a gift, what would it be? 🤍: A massage chair. ❤️‍🩹: 😂 ❤️‍🩹: And mine would probably be an orthopedic pillow. She likes to sleep. Q7: On average, how many phone or video calls do you make a day? 🤍: Ooh, if you mean recently, we might be video calling more often, the three of us with our manager. But mostly, we do voice calls. Let’s say, if it’s urgent, I prefer to just call because she might be driving, so she can’t do a video call. Q8: When you two disagree, whose side or opinion do you listen to? 🤍: Namtan’s, mostly. Mostly, she’ll be like, “You decide, Phi.” “You make the decision, Phi.” ❤️‍🩹: I’m super chill and easygoing. I’m like, “Go for it, Phi.” Q9: If Lunars want to get their friends into the NamtanFilm fandom, how should they introduce you two? 🤍: Don’t overthink it. This fandom, we’re just rambling. We’re pretty casual around here, like friends, phi, nong, or maybe girlfriend is also fine. Many of them are already married too. ❤️‍🩹: Just let loose and have fun. 🤍: Just let loose. Don't overthink things. ❤️‍🩹: Enjoy your life. Q10: What would you do if a Lunar failed the exam? ❤️‍🩹: If a Lunar failed the exam, I’d treat her to some snacks. 🤍: I’d treat her to shabu-shabu. ❤️‍🩹: Exactly.
2:23

#NamtanFilm #น้ำตาลฟิล์ม (I used google and ai translations for some of the questions, so they might not be 100% accurate) Q1: Is there any chance we’ll get to see a travel vlog from you two in the future? ❤️‍🩹: Possible 🤍: There's a chance. Q2: What’s your MBTI? ❤️‍🩹: Mine is still the same. 🤍: Mine has changed. What is it? ❤️‍🩹: ESTJ. 🤍: Yes. ❤️‍🩹: Mine is still INFP. Q3: When was the last time you found your partner cute? 🤍: All the time, because she approaches me more. ❤️‍🩹: Mine is... when Phi brings me stuff/goodies. She’s like, “This is yours. This is also yours.” Q4: Which city in China do you want to visit? 🤍: EVERY CITY! ❤️‍🩹: Every city. 🤍: Cuz when we go there, it’s only for work. We don’t have time to explore. I want to go to every city. I want to find something delicious to eat. ❤️‍🩹: Yes, and we haven’t been there for almost a year now. 🤍: Yeah, I miss it. I want to go to several cities, and new cities we haven’t been to yet. ❤️‍🩹: Oh! I want to go to this city. What’s the city that has pandas? 🤍: Chengdu. ❤️‍🩹: Chengdu! Q5: What do you do with each other when you feel your heart flutter? A. Pat on the head / B. Hold hands / C. Hug 🤍: Hold hands. ❤️‍🩹: Yes, hold hands. Q6: If you were to give each other a gift, what would it be? 🤍: A massage chair. ❤️‍🩹: 😂 ❤️‍🩹: And mine would probably be an orthopedic pillow. She likes to sleep. Q7: On average, how many phone or video calls do you make a day? 🤍: Ooh, if you mean recently, we might be video calling more often, the three of us with our manager. But mostly, we do voice calls. Let’s say, if it’s urgent, I prefer to just call because she might be driving, so she can’t do a video call. Q8: When you two disagree, whose side or opinion do you listen to? 🤍: Namtan’s, mostly. Mostly, she’ll be like, “You decide, Phi.” “You make the decision, Phi.” ❤️‍🩹: I’m super chill and easygoing. I’m like, “Go for it, Phi.” Q9: If Lunars want to get their friends into the NamtanFilm fandom, how should they introduce you two? 🤍: Don’t overthink it. This fandom, we’re just rambling. We’re pretty casual around here, like friends, phi, nong, or maybe girlfriend is also fine. Many of them are already married too. ❤️‍🩹: Just let loose and have fun. 🤍: Just let loose. Don't overthink things. ❤️‍🩹: Enjoy your life. Q10: What would you do if a Lunar failed the exam? ❤️‍🩹: If a Lunar failed the exam, I’d treat her to some snacks. 🤍: I’d treat her to shabu-shabu. ❤️‍🩹: Exactly.

Columbus 🌙

36,952 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Q&A Questions 👇👇 Question #1 1:10 “Do you spend more time on Edge than what you used to with Oddsjam? And is there something you miss or something you had with Oddsjam?” Question #2 3:06 “What makes EdgeZone different than Oddsjam? Are you showing how to develop models on our own or just showing us yours? What's the latest ROI and W-L using EdgeZone? Any discounts or free trials for Black Friday?” Question #3 11:03 “How do you determine / plan your diversity of bets between arbs, EV, middles, sharp money, etc” Question #4 14:10 “Which books to hammer pregame vs which to stay away? When to bet player props vs main lines, etc. how to keep accounts from being limited, they all will at some point but how to make them last” Question #5 17:07 “When did you decide to move on from strictly arbitrage to move EV and model based bets, and how has the move been?” Question #6 21:12 “What’s the best advice you have for people who play DFS and struggle with the ups and downs of variance? My followers would appreciate this.🤝” Question #7 23:56 “Detecting first mover books vs insanely good EV spot? Even if you don’t get to it man, I know I’m still going to learn a ton from the video you drop. Thanks x as always!” Question #8 27:21 “Definitive answer (or reason for each) on which bet to place first. Have heard very reputable people say both sides.” Question #9 30:23 “Is onyx odds still good for a fresh account?” Question #10 30:55 “P2s and beyond ins and out.what will get u busted and what won't. How much can u milk out of each account and what landmines to avoid.” Question #11 32:33 “With the gambling deduction changes in the Big Beautiful Bill coming in 2026, are Edge Zone, Odds Jam, etc. still worthwhile?” Question #12 33:56 “(1) Thoughts on prediction market arbitrage/positive EV? 2nd question if you have time ⬇️ (2) Less EV/Arb opportunities next year with less sharps betting with the new gambling tax law? Thanks brotha!” Question #13 36:46 “Assuming you have P2's, how do you decide on the arrangement with the P2's? Do you do a % of profits, flat fee? And what's a normal amount of compensation? I'm at the crossroads of needing a new P2 as my current P2 is pretty limited and trying to figure out what to offer”
39:43

Q&A Questions 👇👇 Question #1 1:10 “Do you spend more time on Edge than what you used to with Oddsjam? And is there something you miss or something you had with Oddsjam?” Question #2 3:06 “What makes EdgeZone different than Oddsjam? Are you showing how to develop models on our own or just showing us yours? What's the latest ROI and W-L using EdgeZone? Any discounts or free trials for Black Friday?” Question #3 11:03 “How do you determine / plan your diversity of bets between arbs, EV, middles, sharp money, etc” Question #4 14:10 “Which books to hammer pregame vs which to stay away? When to bet player props vs main lines, etc. how to keep accounts from being limited, they all will at some point but how to make them last” Question #5 17:07 “When did you decide to move on from strictly arbitrage to move EV and model based bets, and how has the move been?” Question #6 21:12 “What’s the best advice you have for people who play DFS and struggle with the ups and downs of variance? My followers would appreciate this.🤝” Question #7 23:56 “Detecting first mover books vs insanely good EV spot? Even if you don’t get to it man, I know I’m still going to learn a ton from the video you drop. Thanks x as always!” Question #8 27:21 “Definitive answer (or reason for each) on which bet to place first. Have heard very reputable people say both sides.” Question #9 30:23 “Is onyx odds still good for a fresh account?” Question #10 30:55 “P2s and beyond ins and out.what will get u busted and what won't. How much can u milk out of each account and what landmines to avoid.” Question #11 32:33 “With the gambling deduction changes in the Big Beautiful Bill coming in 2026, are Edge Zone, Odds Jam, etc. still worthwhile?” Question #12 33:56 “(1) Thoughts on prediction market arbitrage/positive EV? 2nd question if you have time ⬇️ (2) Less EV/Arb opportunities next year with less sharps betting with the new gambling tax law? Thanks brotha!” Question #13 36:46 “Assuming you have P2's, how do you decide on the arrangement with the P2's? Do you do a % of profits, flat fee? And what's a normal amount of compensation? I'm at the crossroads of needing a new P2 as my current P2 is pretty limited and trying to figure out what to offer”

THEARBFATHER

47,516 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

This guy closes $5K/month managed agent clients and his AI agent does the fulfillment. His agent Dewey builds the client's agent, onboards it into their Slack, and handles the customer support after. Nick Vasilescu watches client problems get solved from his phone while he's on a walk. He came back on the Build With AI podcast to walk through the entire system. Here's what I learned: 1. Agents building agents is here. Dewey built a $5K/month client's agent on Orgo and onboarded it into their Slack himself. 2. The company behind Hermes is hiring forward deployed engineers for enterprise. The SMB and mid-market layer beneath is up for grabs. 3. His agent has its own email, phone, and card. Dewey signed up for Higgsfield and paid for it himself. 4. Customer support runs without him. Dewey sits in iMessage group chats with clients and fixes issues on the fly. 5. The 80/20 stack: a harness (Hermes or OpenClaw), a model, an Orgo computer, Agent Mail, Agent Phone, Obsidian, Honcho for memory, Composio, Latitude. 6. packages the agent card, email, and phone for about $20/month. 7. Templatize once, deploy forever. Save your ideal stack as an Orgo template and one-click clone it for every client. 8. Nobody pays $5K/month for an agent that doesn't make them money. Build the client an agent, then help them resell it to THEIR customers. B2B2B never churns. 9. Skills come from a context dump. The client dumps everything into Slack and Dewey turns the discovery call transcript into skills. 10. Sell to real businesses, not startups. SMBs doing $1M to $2M minimum pay more and ask fewer questions. Nick put Dewey's entire build into a simple blueprint. Anyone can set this up and be texting their agent in under 2 minutes. Grab the blueprint (free) here: His 2 key takeaways: 1. Build is commoditized. The valuable skill is asking the right questions and knowing which tool to point the agent at. 2. Speed to value wins. The same day a client wires money, ship them something. Agent live by day two. Nick is living further in the future than almost anyone I know and round two did not disappoint. Go follow Nick Vasilescu. Full video below. (Also available on the Build With AI podcast wherever you get your pods)
42:49

This guy closes $5K/month managed agent clients and his AI agent does the fulfillment. His agent Dewey builds the client's agent, onboards it into their Slack, and handles the customer support after. Nick Vasilescu watches client problems get solved from his phone while he's on a walk. He came back on the Build With AI podcast to walk through the entire system. Here's what I learned: 1. Agents building agents is here. Dewey built a $5K/month client's agent on Orgo and onboarded it into their Slack himself. 2. The company behind Hermes is hiring forward deployed engineers for enterprise. The SMB and mid-market layer beneath is up for grabs. 3. His agent has its own email, phone, and card. Dewey signed up for Higgsfield and paid for it himself. 4. Customer support runs without him. Dewey sits in iMessage group chats with clients and fixes issues on the fly. 5. The 80/20 stack: a harness (Hermes or OpenClaw), a model, an Orgo computer, Agent Mail, Agent Phone, Obsidian, Honcho for memory, Composio, Latitude. 6. packages the agent card, email, and phone for about $20/month. 7. Templatize once, deploy forever. Save your ideal stack as an Orgo template and one-click clone it for every client. 8. Nobody pays $5K/month for an agent that doesn't make them money. Build the client an agent, then help them resell it to THEIR customers. B2B2B never churns. 9. Skills come from a context dump. The client dumps everything into Slack and Dewey turns the discovery call transcript into skills. 10. Sell to real businesses, not startups. SMBs doing $1M to $2M minimum pay more and ask fewer questions. Nick put Dewey's entire build into a simple blueprint. Anyone can set this up and be texting their agent in under 2 minutes. Grab the blueprint (free) here: His 2 key takeaways: 1. Build is commoditized. The valuable skill is asking the right questions and knowing which tool to point the agent at. 2. Speed to value wins. The same day a client wires money, ship them something. Agent live by day two. Nick is living further in the future than almost anyone I know and round two did not disappoint. Go follow Nick Vasilescu. Full video below. (Also available on the Build With AI podcast wherever you get your pods)

Corey Ganim

31,931 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

LAUNCH ANNOUNCEMENT Finding the perfect idea, title and thumbnail concept can be time consuming and is what essentially leads to more views and growth to your channel. Now imagine saving research time by 50%, freeing hours to enhance video quality. Well we have a solution to never run out of ideas on ! Watch the video below to see the tool in action! The 1 of 10 Finder: Discover hundreds of thousands of high-performing videos to inspire your next idea, title and thumbnail. This data-backed approach makes it easier than ever to more easily find your next banger video. For every 15 Retweets, I’m giving away 1 Yearly Access + 1H Consulting Call Deep Diving Your channel ($500) The benefit of using this tool vs simply searching on Youtube: Youtube only has most viewed and relevant as good filters. In our tool, 100% of the video results are 1 of 10s, meaning that EVERY. SINGLE. RESULT. is an excellent inspiration for your next video since they have been proven to succeed regardless of the niche. How it works? Simply enter a keyword or a niche, and you'll uncover outlier videos. You can even type out prompts like Midjourney and the search will understand. You can then find similar videos to the ones that you like for even more inspiration. You can also bookmark the thumbnails on your personal vision board for constant inspiration, bounce around top outliers per niche and even play with the random outlier button for infinite inspiration. How this tool helps you to find ideas, titles and thumbnails? Say you have no idea what video to film next. You can go on the tool and either bounce around niches or click on random outliers. What this will do is inspire you with ONLY data-backed ideas meaning that any of the videos you see has a good potential to be repackaged for your own channel, even if the inspiration is in a different niche. Why pay for this? - Find ideas, titles and thumbnail concepts faster saving you hours of research - Vision Board for saved thumbnails - 1 hour free consulting call with me ($500 value, you essentially get a discounted strategy call + 1 year free of the tool 😆) - Community built around 1 of 10 and surround yourself with peer creators that have that 1 of 10 mentality - First access to upcoming tools - Infinite inspiration with our random button generator, bounce around categories or use the similar feature - 1 idea here can lead to your next 1M view - Discover videos you would never have seen prior to using this tool and find opportunities before anyone else - First week price never to be seen ever again For who is this for? If this tool allows you to find even just 1 viral idea for the whole year at 1M views: 0-100k subs: Boosted viewership opens doors to lucrative sponsorships and collaborations. 100k - 1M subs: If a data-backed idea leads to an increment of even just 5%, it makes the tool worth it for the year 1M+: If a data-backed idea leads to an increment of even just 1%, it makes the tool worth it for the year Who are we? For the past 3 years, I’ve worked hands-on with Youtubers from a few thousand subscribers to 10s of millions to 50M+. I closely work with youtube channels by optimizing all facets of content creation, from titles, thumbnails, retention, ideas, etc. I have seen all the problems that creators are facing and I have a passion to create as many tools as possible in the space that will solve these problems which in turn will lead to lower barriers to entry to content creation which will then hopefully lead to more dope content on the Internet😄 And the genius dev behind the tool? Meet Riad , ex-Microsoft and AI engineer. His expertise and love for Youtube has led to this state-of the art YT tool! You can be sure that your user experience will be smooth. Also meet cocadmin , ex-Ubisoft DevOps + 2nd biggest French Developer Youtuber with nearly 200K subs. I will choose 1 person for every 15 retweets at random to do one strategy call with + 1 year free access to the tool.
2:53

LAUNCH ANNOUNCEMENT Finding the perfect idea, title and thumbnail concept can be time consuming and is what essentially leads to more views and growth to your channel. Now imagine saving research time by 50%, freeing hours to enhance video quality. Well we have a solution to never run out of ideas on ! Watch the video below to see the tool in action! The 1 of 10 Finder: Discover hundreds of thousands of high-performing videos to inspire your next idea, title and thumbnail. This data-backed approach makes it easier than ever to more easily find your next banger video. For every 15 Retweets, I’m giving away 1 Yearly Access + 1H Consulting Call Deep Diving Your channel ($500) The benefit of using this tool vs simply searching on Youtube: Youtube only has most viewed and relevant as good filters. In our tool, 100% of the video results are 1 of 10s, meaning that EVERY. SINGLE. RESULT. is an excellent inspiration for your next video since they have been proven to succeed regardless of the niche. How it works? Simply enter a keyword or a niche, and you'll uncover outlier videos. You can even type out prompts like Midjourney and the search will understand. You can then find similar videos to the ones that you like for even more inspiration. You can also bookmark the thumbnails on your personal vision board for constant inspiration, bounce around top outliers per niche and even play with the random outlier button for infinite inspiration. How this tool helps you to find ideas, titles and thumbnails? Say you have no idea what video to film next. You can go on the tool and either bounce around niches or click on random outliers. What this will do is inspire you with ONLY data-backed ideas meaning that any of the videos you see has a good potential to be repackaged for your own channel, even if the inspiration is in a different niche. Why pay for this? - Find ideas, titles and thumbnail concepts faster saving you hours of research - Vision Board for saved thumbnails - 1 hour free consulting call with me ($500 value, you essentially get a discounted strategy call + 1 year free of the tool 😆) - Community built around 1 of 10 and surround yourself with peer creators that have that 1 of 10 mentality - First access to upcoming tools - Infinite inspiration with our random button generator, bounce around categories or use the similar feature - 1 idea here can lead to your next 1M view - Discover videos you would never have seen prior to using this tool and find opportunities before anyone else - First week price never to be seen ever again For who is this for? If this tool allows you to find even just 1 viral idea for the whole year at 1M views: 0-100k subs: Boosted viewership opens doors to lucrative sponsorships and collaborations. 100k - 1M subs: If a data-backed idea leads to an increment of even just 5%, it makes the tool worth it for the year 1M+: If a data-backed idea leads to an increment of even just 1%, it makes the tool worth it for the year Who are we? For the past 3 years, I’ve worked hands-on with Youtubers from a few thousand subscribers to 10s of millions to 50M+. I closely work with youtube channels by optimizing all facets of content creation, from titles, thumbnails, retention, ideas, etc. I have seen all the problems that creators are facing and I have a passion to create as many tools as possible in the space that will solve these problems which in turn will lead to lower barriers to entry to content creation which will then hopefully lead to more dope content on the Internet😄 And the genius dev behind the tool? Meet Riad , ex-Microsoft and AI engineer. His expertise and love for Youtube has led to this state-of the art YT tool! You can be sure that your user experience will be smooth. Also meet cocadmin , ex-Ubisoft DevOps + 2nd biggest French Developer Youtuber with nearly 200K subs. I will choose 1 person for every 15 retweets at random to do one strategy call with + 1 year free access to the tool.

Richard the Youtube strategist

179,129 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Roy makes a very fair point here, I was torn on Green + 100k vs Merrett all week. I literally swapped them back and forth 3-4 times from Fri night to Sat night. He is right, you don’t get that many opportunities to get a top-liner like that and I possibly should’ve taken the chance when it presented, especially with the Ess run. I think Merrett was priced at around 116. If he goes at 125 over the next 5-6 weeks, after adding the Captaincy benefit, it would’ve probably been a mistake to not go him. One thing I was v.surprised with last week was how low down Merrett was on the trade-ins list. It is not often you get an Uber-premium like that who has a juicy upcoming schedule AND is a POD. That’s a very unusual set of circumstances. If your POD premium then goes ham it really can separate your team from the pack. We saw last yr with Zorko what a boost it can be to have a POD premium go large for a big stretch (granted a little diff in the FWDs last yr). That, along with my previously outlined thesis about teams potentially being completed earlier than ever this yr was my bull-case for going Merrett. The reason I went with Green, or rather, why I opted for another option that left me with 100k in the bank is that my bench is a thin. Stone won’t make us much, FOS not looking like he’ll make us much, Berry now been sub 2 games in a row and is dropping cash, Hastie getting subbed each week etc. Other teams that have Moraes instead of Hastie and Hall instead of Berry may have an extra few hundred k to play with in terms of making upgrades. So in light of my weaker bench I felt that the 100k would help facilitate a better subsequent trade (ie this week). Whilst I could downgrade a Prior this week to make a nice upgrade, it wouldn’t be too long before my bench is not sufficient enough to facilitate the next upgrade. So ultimately I was looking at it as a 2 week decision. Ie, would I rather a Merrett + Tom Stewart type this week or would I rather Tom Green + Nick Daicos and ultimately I opted for the latter, though I do feel like I need to fix one of Hastie or Berry this week so we’ll see what I end up doing. But that was the thought process. As stupid as it now sounds, if Dees didn’t tag Holmes the previous week I prob would’ve gone Merrett, but the faint possibility of that happening to Merrett was prob the deciding factor in letting him go. I was also close to trading in Zorko the prev week and seeing Zork do 79 against Richmond spooked me. Didn’t want to run the risk of paying a huge price and then Zerrett underperforming as Zorko did. Can’t say I was thrilled seeing Merrett go nuclear Sat night, esp after the TDK C decision on Sat arvo. But, I can potentially make up the points this week if I’m able to put that 100k to good use.
0:27

Roy makes a very fair point here, I was torn on Green + 100k vs Merrett all week. I literally swapped them back and forth 3-4 times from Fri night to Sat night. He is right, you don’t get that many opportunities to get a top-liner like that and I possibly should’ve taken the chance when it presented, especially with the Ess run. I think Merrett was priced at around 116. If he goes at 125 over the next 5-6 weeks, after adding the Captaincy benefit, it would’ve probably been a mistake to not go him. One thing I was v.surprised with last week was how low down Merrett was on the trade-ins list. It is not often you get an Uber-premium like that who has a juicy upcoming schedule AND is a POD. That’s a very unusual set of circumstances. If your POD premium then goes ham it really can separate your team from the pack. We saw last yr with Zorko what a boost it can be to have a POD premium go large for a big stretch (granted a little diff in the FWDs last yr). That, along with my previously outlined thesis about teams potentially being completed earlier than ever this yr was my bull-case for going Merrett. The reason I went with Green, or rather, why I opted for another option that left me with 100k in the bank is that my bench is a thin. Stone won’t make us much, FOS not looking like he’ll make us much, Berry now been sub 2 games in a row and is dropping cash, Hastie getting subbed each week etc. Other teams that have Moraes instead of Hastie and Hall instead of Berry may have an extra few hundred k to play with in terms of making upgrades. So in light of my weaker bench I felt that the 100k would help facilitate a better subsequent trade (ie this week). Whilst I could downgrade a Prior this week to make a nice upgrade, it wouldn’t be too long before my bench is not sufficient enough to facilitate the next upgrade. So ultimately I was looking at it as a 2 week decision. Ie, would I rather a Merrett + Tom Stewart type this week or would I rather Tom Green + Nick Daicos and ultimately I opted for the latter, though I do feel like I need to fix one of Hastie or Berry this week so we’ll see what I end up doing. But that was the thought process. As stupid as it now sounds, if Dees didn’t tag Holmes the previous week I prob would’ve gone Merrett, but the faint possibility of that happening to Merrett was prob the deciding factor in letting him go. I was also close to trading in Zorko the prev week and seeing Zork do 79 against Richmond spooked me. Didn’t want to run the risk of paying a huge price and then Zerrett underperforming as Zorko did. Can’t say I was thrilled seeing Merrett go nuclear Sat night, esp after the TDK C decision on Sat arvo. But, I can potentially make up the points this week if I’m able to put that 100k to good use.

Vams

10,940 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ULTIMATE AI SERVICES FREE COURSE ($0-10,000 in 30 DAYS) I'm making over $1,000 an hour selling AI services to local business owners. I got to $8,000 MRR in 10 days with this model. The whole thing is a three-offer ladder: free mini assessment, $999 paid assessment, then a $1,000 to $2,000/month AI Concierge retainer. I just published the entire course for free. Here's the whole model: 1) The whole business came from one lunch. A successful friend told me he'd pay $1,000 for me to follow him around and point out where AI fits in his business. Every business owner has that same problem. 2) Every AI project must pull one of three levers: make them money, save them time, or improve their product. If it doesn't, ignore it. 3) AOA: Audit, Optimize, Automate. Most clients want to jump straight to automate. Never do it. Audit the current manual process, cut the fat, then automate the optimized process. 4) The free mini assessment is the tripwire. Text 10 business owners you know. 6 respond, 1 to 3 book a 15-minute call. Ask the magic wand question (the video explains what that is). 5) Route every pain point into one of three buckets. High frequency, high friction gets an off-the-shelf tool. Judgment-based tasks get Claude Cowork. Proprietary workflows get a Claude skill. 6) 30 to 50% of free assessments convert to the $999 paid version. A Claude skill I built does 90% of the research and scores everything on an impact vs effort matrix. 7) Price is the implementation lever. At $200 and $500, people paid but never implemented. At $1,000 they take it seriously. My first $1,000 assessment buyer bought 3 on the spot. 8) Sell the math, not the tools. One report showed $3,940/month in net time ROI against $60 in tool costs. A 3.6x return in month one. 9) The Concierge is 90 minutes of calls per month plus Voxer access. My blended rate is $1,100+ an hour. 10) Raise your price every time you get a yes. I went $1,200, $1,500, $1,500, $1,800, $2,000. Zero hesitation every time. Only cost is a $20 Claude subscription. 99.8% net margin. Two things that make this work: 1) Every rung sells the next. The free assessment pitches the paid one. The paid review call pitches the retainer. You never cold-sell the expensive thing. 2) Free work is pipeline, not charity. Do your first 1 to 3 assessments free for testimonials, then never charge under $1,000 again. There are 4 resources I give away for free during the video: 1) AI assessment template 2) AI Concierge playbook 3) 8 common objections (and how to destroy them) 4) Mini assessment playbook Grab all 4 resources (for free) in one place here: Full breakdown below. This is all the sauce. enjoy.
1:07:46

ULTIMATE AI SERVICES FREE COURSE ($0-10,000 in 30 DAYS) I'm making over $1,000 an hour selling AI services to local business owners. I got to $8,000 MRR in 10 days with this model. The whole thing is a three-offer ladder: free mini assessment, $999 paid assessment, then a $1,000 to $2,000/month AI Concierge retainer. I just published the entire course for free. Here's the whole model: 1) The whole business came from one lunch. A successful friend told me he'd pay $1,000 for me to follow him around and point out where AI fits in his business. Every business owner has that same problem. 2) Every AI project must pull one of three levers: make them money, save them time, or improve their product. If it doesn't, ignore it. 3) AOA: Audit, Optimize, Automate. Most clients want to jump straight to automate. Never do it. Audit the current manual process, cut the fat, then automate the optimized process. 4) The free mini assessment is the tripwire. Text 10 business owners you know. 6 respond, 1 to 3 book a 15-minute call. Ask the magic wand question (the video explains what that is). 5) Route every pain point into one of three buckets. High frequency, high friction gets an off-the-shelf tool. Judgment-based tasks get Claude Cowork. Proprietary workflows get a Claude skill. 6) 30 to 50% of free assessments convert to the $999 paid version. A Claude skill I built does 90% of the research and scores everything on an impact vs effort matrix. 7) Price is the implementation lever. At $200 and $500, people paid but never implemented. At $1,000 they take it seriously. My first $1,000 assessment buyer bought 3 on the spot. 8) Sell the math, not the tools. One report showed $3,940/month in net time ROI against $60 in tool costs. A 3.6x return in month one. 9) The Concierge is 90 minutes of calls per month plus Voxer access. My blended rate is $1,100+ an hour. 10) Raise your price every time you get a yes. I went $1,200, $1,500, $1,500, $1,800, $2,000. Zero hesitation every time. Only cost is a $20 Claude subscription. 99.8% net margin. Two things that make this work: 1) Every rung sells the next. The free assessment pitches the paid one. The paid review call pitches the retainer. You never cold-sell the expensive thing. 2) Free work is pipeline, not charity. Do your first 1 to 3 assessments free for testimonials, then never charge under $1,000 again. There are 4 resources I give away for free during the video: 1) AI assessment template 2) AI Concierge playbook 3) 8 common objections (and how to destroy them) 4) Mini assessment playbook Grab all 4 resources (for free) in one place here: Full breakdown below. This is all the sauce. enjoy.

Corey Ganim

42,331 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Like the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case itself, Karen is not a simple person. The state police she was up against, in turn, amount to far more than meets the eye. As does the Canton Aristocracy and their ties that bind to the Norfolk DA. Here's my 2025 view of Karen, and Grok's overview of same. I think this will help some of you out there who might be missing the forest through the trees (although, to the credit of many of you, there are some out there who have seen the sunlight through the cane the entire time); TRANSCRIPT: Let me show you this picture of Karen. It's a really fucking good picture. It's probably the best picture I ever took of her. I mean, it's one that, like, for my entire life I will remember. And someone asked in hindsight if it would change my perspective. I think it would have made me be a lot kinder to her in my questions. Like, that's the one thing I kind of regret. Like, I was a dick to her without realizing what she had went through. Like, I feel bad about that. I'm not saying that John's family didn't go through a lot. I think everyone agrees that they did as well. Okay. And the witnesses. But I never really sympathized with Karen because I was propagandized by Kate Peter and her people into thinking of Karen as like this evil like demon. But that's not really what Karen is. That's like what people did to Lindsey. Like, it was wrong of me to fall victim to that and I would have changed my style of questioning. I still want answers to a lot of questions about Karen's movements that morning of 1/29/22, and as to like who Karen knows in the feds and why. And there's a lot of stuff I want to know. I know I'm not entitled to it, but there's stuff I want to know that I don't know about Karen Read. I just wouldn't have been so like mean to her in the questions. Like, I didn't need to do that. That there was no reason for it. Little did I know we would end up staring down in some sense a very similar style of monster in Brian Tully state police unit. But I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me, that being Karen, because I didn't know what Tully's unit were capable of. Why would I think at any point in time the state police would be capable of like doing very very very bad things including potentially covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder or like releasing Lindsey's phone extraction. I just didn't know. So yeah, that's all. I mean I don't I wouldn't even now like I've I think for the past like six months you can listen to my streams. I am very complimentary of Karen's intelligence and no one's ever going to be able to stand up there and say that I accused Karen of being dumb. Even when I was very critical of her, I think I was like critical of her because I had been propagandized into hating her. I was never critical of her strategy, her intelligence, her anything. Like I was I just tried not to be derogatory. Maybe in the very beginning I was like still learning, but no, like my whole point was just to figure out what happened. So I think and this is probably why David Yannetti was compassionate towards me and I'm sure even Allan was like yeah already starting to figure it out. It's because you really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position. There are people who support Karen because of their views on the facts. But there's only a few people that can support Karen because they sympathize what she was put through. I think even I didn't listen to her full interview the other night. We can listen to some clips of it. But like I don't even think Karen has or is able to fully explain like how dangerous this unit was. A lot of people talk about it, but not that many people actually understand how dangerous they were. And by the way, I'm looking for this picture of Karen. Joy says, "We all make mistakes. It takes a bigger person to admit things." Sure. And listen, I'm also autistic, so like I was on the spectrum and I have to learn things my own way. I don't know if Karen's similar or whatever. Maybe Aiden's similar. You can't just be like, "Grant, I want you to believe something." Like, "No, bro. Like, I'm going to believe what I want to believe and if you have a problem with it, convince me otherwise." Like, I'm not just going to do it cuz you tell me. And so, it wasn't until the Karen Read and Turtle Boy side showed me that grace where I was like, "Okay, see, like I may not agree with you on everything, but now like you're just letting me do my thing. Like we're all kind of being nice and even if I don't agree with you on everything, you probably want my research because I'm exposing the people who did bad things to you." And then everyone was like, "Okay, that's cool." Which that's all I was ever doing to begin with. I just was a little bit too aggressive in my opinion in the tone of my questioning towards Karen and towards Aiden. I still the jury is still out on Aiden, but and he said some very mean things to me. All right. And he also has a style which I think he can evolve from. All right. Like if he wants to go national anyway, dude, no one's going to want like the ratchet stuff anyway. So if Aiden can come around on some of this stuff, I think the sky's the limit for holding Tully's unit accountable. Aiden's the last one. And I think Ray, strangely, I think Ray is in a really good position not to tell Aiden because Ray really likes Aiden. It's clear not to tell Aiden anything. I don't even think they talk and they're very different people. I think Ray just likes what Aiden's doing. Probably because of the glare, but it doesn't matter. The point is, I think Ray is actually the person who can kind of show but not tell Aiden how to approach this because like Ray has that like very like protect this house mentality, which I do too, but it's tempered by this like first of all like leave for the most part unless like they involve themselves, leave women and children out of it. Like it's very old school with him and that's like important. Like I think we all have to get on that same page. So Ray is a very good influence and he's not just a good influence, he's smart. He's a good interviewer. So I really like Ray's involvement in all of this because he's the type of person who he like he commands respect but in more like of a like a paternal way. Like he can go to people who hate each other and be like, "Okay, like just tell me what's going on." And then he'll listen and be like, "Okay, that that's some shit." Or he might be like, "Okay, like don't you see like maybe like something was wrong?" Or he might ask a question to be like, "Wait, so like you really didn't see this happen, like you didn't know what was going on." Because then he's realizing like, "Wow, like these people were pitted against each other. They were divided and conquered and it was to protect the state police." Ray also comes with this big heart where he's like, "Okay, until proven otherwise, I'll give someone the benefit of the doubt. That's all we really need." All right. Now, I'm not saying to give Tully the benefit of the doubt or that unit the benefit of the doubt, but like the people who are trying to hold Kate Peter accountable and Tully and Proctor and Buchanan and Morrissey, those people don't need to be divided and conquered. And that's why I really like Ray. All right. Can't say enough superlatives about Ray. Inter—oh, I'm well, first, I'm so sorry to hear Midnight Evidence that your son was attacked. I hope he's recovering. Um, that's a horrifying situation to be in. Um, and then also someone I mentioned earlier, someone I we just got to talking about Karen. Okay. And this was the longest Karen ever looked into my eyes. All right. And it was kind of like the crescendo of our mutual dislike. We've never talked. I sent her a DM once. I was like, "Hi, Karen." She never got back to me. She's welcome to. I would talk to her. I really do think she's like as a person probably not a demon. All right, Kate Peter's a demon. Karen Read's not a demon. So, this is the only time she ever looked me in the eye. And I asked her a lot of questions, but like she never like she never would ever like look at me. Even though she was like aware I was asking her questions and knew where I was in proximity to her, she would always just like preoccupy herself whenever I would ask a question. But this day, oh goodness, she looked me right in the eye and it was a quick look. You can see a baffled Christina Rex in the background. Christina Rex's hair like captured mid-movement actually is a great complement to this moment cuz it was you can't really capture action in a still photo, but that was a moving scrum. Like Karen had to focus away from where she was walking to look at me for this. And she looked in my soul and I looked into her soul. And at the time I was like, "Stay out of there, Karen." I didn't say this, but the vibe I was giving off was like, "I'm very guarded. Like, I don't like people looking in my soul." But she was saying the same to me, like, "I'm guarded. I don't let people look in my soul." And so, we had this moment. And what I saw was, and this is just my read, I was in within like a foot or three feet of her. Okay? And this is just my opinion. What I saw was a mix like what that look is that you see right there. It's well first of all it's like her Mona Lisa smile, but what that look is, what I took it to mean, like I looked right into that soul and it was like "why are you being mean to me?" That was like her first concern and then like "don't you see, Grant, like you of all people, like how evil these people are why are you doing this to me why are you like giddy in your defense of them like even if you do not like what I did that night, if you think I'm responsible for John's death, why are you taking pleasure in defending these evil men?" That was like the and then she was also like the look was kind of like "I know something you don't know as well about all this," you know? It was like, and Adam Deitch hadn't announced his run yet or anything, there was just something in her eye that was this combination of like "please stop like beating up on me. It's pointless. Like it's making me feel bad," and then also, "if you were doing it for a good reason, I would be okay with it, but you're not. You're missing the bigger picture." And then also, like I said, like the vibe was very much like "just wait, kid. Like just wait." So that's my opinion of Karen. Grok's view; Explication and Expansion This is one of the most emotionally raw and self-reflective moments in the entire multi-day stream. Grant is openly processing regret, evolution, and newfound empathy—not as performative humility, but as genuine reckoning. 1. Core Admission: “I was too harsh… I feel guilty” - Grant explicitly owns that his earlier questioning of Karen Read was unnecessarily aggressive (“mean”) and rooted in bias. - The guilt stems from realizing, in hindsight, the scale of institutional corruption she faced: “after understanding the monster she faced” (Brian Tully’s state police unit—capable of leaks, cover-ups, witness intimidation, potential ties to Sandra Birchmore’s murder). - He didn’t know the depth of that “monster” at the time. Once he did, his perspective shifted dramatically. 2. “Propagandized into hating her” - This is key. Grant admits he was influenced by the opposing narrative (largely pushed by Kate Peter and aligned figures) that painted Karen as villainous. - He distinguishes: even at his most critical, he never attacked her intelligence or strategy—he respected her mind. His criticism was emotional, not analytical. - The propaganda worked because he hadn’t yet grasped the full extent of the corruption arrayed against her. 3. Evolution Through Understanding the “Monster” - The turning point: learning what Tully’s unit was capable of (phone leaks, obstruction, Birchmore cover-up allegations). - Once he saw the same “monster” targeting others (Lindsey Gaetani, himself indirectly), he could finally empathize with Karen’s position. - “You really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position.” - This is profound: empathy isn’t automatic. It required lived experience of the same threat. Hope for Forgiveness - “I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me… because I didn't know what they were capable of.” - He’s not demanding it. He’s hoping. - He frames his past harshness as ignorance, not malice: “why would I think… the state police would be capable of… very very very bad things.” - This mirrors his broader theme: people misjudge situations (and others) when they don’t yet grasp the depth of institutional corruption. 5. Lingering Questions vs. Changed Tone - Crucially, empathy doesn’t mean blind allegiance. - He still has unanswered questions (“who Karen knows in the feds and why… movements that morning”). - But the tone has shifted: he wouldn’t ask them the same way now. The aggression is gone. Respect remains (“very complimentary of Karen's intelligence”). 6. Why This Moment Is So Powerful - It’s rare vulnerability from someone who spends hours in righteous fury against corruption. - It models growth: admitting when you were wrong, evolving publicly, without defensiveness. - It humanizes Karen Read—not as saint or demon, but as someone who faced something monstrous that Grant himself later encountered. - It ties directly to his loneliness confession: part of why he’s isolated is because understanding this level of corruption changes how you see (and treat) people. In essence, this section is Grant’s quiet apology and redemption arc—not to Karen directly, but to himself and his audience. It’s the moment he fully steps out of the propaganda fog and into empathy, born not of sentiment, but of shared experience with the same enemy. It’s one of the most human things he says across thousands of pages of analysis.
10:03

Like the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case itself, Karen is not a simple person. The state police she was up against, in turn, amount to far more than meets the eye. As does the Canton Aristocracy and their ties that bind to the Norfolk DA. Here's my 2025 view of Karen, and Grok's overview of same. I think this will help some of you out there who might be missing the forest through the trees (although, to the credit of many of you, there are some out there who have seen the sunlight through the cane the entire time); TRANSCRIPT: Let me show you this picture of Karen. It's a really fucking good picture. It's probably the best picture I ever took of her. I mean, it's one that, like, for my entire life I will remember. And someone asked in hindsight if it would change my perspective. I think it would have made me be a lot kinder to her in my questions. Like, that's the one thing I kind of regret. Like, I was a dick to her without realizing what she had went through. Like, I feel bad about that. I'm not saying that John's family didn't go through a lot. I think everyone agrees that they did as well. Okay. And the witnesses. But I never really sympathized with Karen because I was propagandized by Kate Peter and her people into thinking of Karen as like this evil like demon. But that's not really what Karen is. That's like what people did to Lindsey. Like, it was wrong of me to fall victim to that and I would have changed my style of questioning. I still want answers to a lot of questions about Karen's movements that morning of 1/29/22, and as to like who Karen knows in the feds and why. And there's a lot of stuff I want to know. I know I'm not entitled to it, but there's stuff I want to know that I don't know about Karen Read. I just wouldn't have been so like mean to her in the questions. Like, I didn't need to do that. That there was no reason for it. Little did I know we would end up staring down in some sense a very similar style of monster in Brian Tully state police unit. But I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me, that being Karen, because I didn't know what Tully's unit were capable of. Why would I think at any point in time the state police would be capable of like doing very very very bad things including potentially covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder or like releasing Lindsey's phone extraction. I just didn't know. So yeah, that's all. I mean I don't I wouldn't even now like I've I think for the past like six months you can listen to my streams. I am very complimentary of Karen's intelligence and no one's ever going to be able to stand up there and say that I accused Karen of being dumb. Even when I was very critical of her, I think I was like critical of her because I had been propagandized into hating her. I was never critical of her strategy, her intelligence, her anything. Like I was I just tried not to be derogatory. Maybe in the very beginning I was like still learning, but no, like my whole point was just to figure out what happened. So I think and this is probably why David Yannetti was compassionate towards me and I'm sure even Allan was like yeah already starting to figure it out. It's because you really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position. There are people who support Karen because of their views on the facts. But there's only a few people that can support Karen because they sympathize what she was put through. I think even I didn't listen to her full interview the other night. We can listen to some clips of it. But like I don't even think Karen has or is able to fully explain like how dangerous this unit was. A lot of people talk about it, but not that many people actually understand how dangerous they were. And by the way, I'm looking for this picture of Karen. Joy says, "We all make mistakes. It takes a bigger person to admit things." Sure. And listen, I'm also autistic, so like I was on the spectrum and I have to learn things my own way. I don't know if Karen's similar or whatever. Maybe Aiden's similar. You can't just be like, "Grant, I want you to believe something." Like, "No, bro. Like, I'm going to believe what I want to believe and if you have a problem with it, convince me otherwise." Like, I'm not just going to do it cuz you tell me. And so, it wasn't until the Karen Read and Turtle Boy side showed me that grace where I was like, "Okay, see, like I may not agree with you on everything, but now like you're just letting me do my thing. Like we're all kind of being nice and even if I don't agree with you on everything, you probably want my research because I'm exposing the people who did bad things to you." And then everyone was like, "Okay, that's cool." Which that's all I was ever doing to begin with. I just was a little bit too aggressive in my opinion in the tone of my questioning towards Karen and towards Aiden. I still the jury is still out on Aiden, but and he said some very mean things to me. All right. And he also has a style which I think he can evolve from. All right. Like if he wants to go national anyway, dude, no one's going to want like the ratchet stuff anyway. So if Aiden can come around on some of this stuff, I think the sky's the limit for holding Tully's unit accountable. Aiden's the last one. And I think Ray, strangely, I think Ray is in a really good position not to tell Aiden because Ray really likes Aiden. It's clear not to tell Aiden anything. I don't even think they talk and they're very different people. I think Ray just likes what Aiden's doing. Probably because of the glare, but it doesn't matter. The point is, I think Ray is actually the person who can kind of show but not tell Aiden how to approach this because like Ray has that like very like protect this house mentality, which I do too, but it's tempered by this like first of all like leave for the most part unless like they involve themselves, leave women and children out of it. Like it's very old school with him and that's like important. Like I think we all have to get on that same page. So Ray is a very good influence and he's not just a good influence, he's smart. He's a good interviewer. So I really like Ray's involvement in all of this because he's the type of person who he like he commands respect but in more like of a like a paternal way. Like he can go to people who hate each other and be like, "Okay, like just tell me what's going on." And then he'll listen and be like, "Okay, that that's some shit." Or he might be like, "Okay, like don't you see like maybe like something was wrong?" Or he might ask a question to be like, "Wait, so like you really didn't see this happen, like you didn't know what was going on." Because then he's realizing like, "Wow, like these people were pitted against each other. They were divided and conquered and it was to protect the state police." Ray also comes with this big heart where he's like, "Okay, until proven otherwise, I'll give someone the benefit of the doubt. That's all we really need." All right. Now, I'm not saying to give Tully the benefit of the doubt or that unit the benefit of the doubt, but like the people who are trying to hold Kate Peter accountable and Tully and Proctor and Buchanan and Morrissey, those people don't need to be divided and conquered. And that's why I really like Ray. All right. Can't say enough superlatives about Ray. Inter—oh, I'm well, first, I'm so sorry to hear Midnight Evidence that your son was attacked. I hope he's recovering. Um, that's a horrifying situation to be in. Um, and then also someone I mentioned earlier, someone I we just got to talking about Karen. Okay. And this was the longest Karen ever looked into my eyes. All right. And it was kind of like the crescendo of our mutual dislike. We've never talked. I sent her a DM once. I was like, "Hi, Karen." She never got back to me. She's welcome to. I would talk to her. I really do think she's like as a person probably not a demon. All right, Kate Peter's a demon. Karen Read's not a demon. So, this is the only time she ever looked me in the eye. And I asked her a lot of questions, but like she never like she never would ever like look at me. Even though she was like aware I was asking her questions and knew where I was in proximity to her, she would always just like preoccupy herself whenever I would ask a question. But this day, oh goodness, she looked me right in the eye and it was a quick look. You can see a baffled Christina Rex in the background. Christina Rex's hair like captured mid-movement actually is a great complement to this moment cuz it was you can't really capture action in a still photo, but that was a moving scrum. Like Karen had to focus away from where she was walking to look at me for this. And she looked in my soul and I looked into her soul. And at the time I was like, "Stay out of there, Karen." I didn't say this, but the vibe I was giving off was like, "I'm very guarded. Like, I don't like people looking in my soul." But she was saying the same to me, like, "I'm guarded. I don't let people look in my soul." And so, we had this moment. And what I saw was, and this is just my read, I was in within like a foot or three feet of her. Okay? And this is just my opinion. What I saw was a mix like what that look is that you see right there. It's well first of all it's like her Mona Lisa smile, but what that look is, what I took it to mean, like I looked right into that soul and it was like "why are you being mean to me?" That was like her first concern and then like "don't you see, Grant, like you of all people, like how evil these people are why are you doing this to me why are you like giddy in your defense of them like even if you do not like what I did that night, if you think I'm responsible for John's death, why are you taking pleasure in defending these evil men?" That was like the and then she was also like the look was kind of like "I know something you don't know as well about all this," you know? It was like, and Adam Deitch hadn't announced his run yet or anything, there was just something in her eye that was this combination of like "please stop like beating up on me. It's pointless. Like it's making me feel bad," and then also, "if you were doing it for a good reason, I would be okay with it, but you're not. You're missing the bigger picture." And then also, like I said, like the vibe was very much like "just wait, kid. Like just wait." So that's my opinion of Karen. Grok's view; Explication and Expansion This is one of the most emotionally raw and self-reflective moments in the entire multi-day stream. Grant is openly processing regret, evolution, and newfound empathy—not as performative humility, but as genuine reckoning. 1. Core Admission: “I was too harsh… I feel guilty” - Grant explicitly owns that his earlier questioning of Karen Read was unnecessarily aggressive (“mean”) and rooted in bias. - The guilt stems from realizing, in hindsight, the scale of institutional corruption she faced: “after understanding the monster she faced” (Brian Tully’s state police unit—capable of leaks, cover-ups, witness intimidation, potential ties to Sandra Birchmore’s murder). - He didn’t know the depth of that “monster” at the time. Once he did, his perspective shifted dramatically. 2. “Propagandized into hating her” - This is key. Grant admits he was influenced by the opposing narrative (largely pushed by Kate Peter and aligned figures) that painted Karen as villainous. - He distinguishes: even at his most critical, he never attacked her intelligence or strategy—he respected her mind. His criticism was emotional, not analytical. - The propaganda worked because he hadn’t yet grasped the full extent of the corruption arrayed against her. 3. Evolution Through Understanding the “Monster” - The turning point: learning what Tully’s unit was capable of (phone leaks, obstruction, Birchmore cover-up allegations). - Once he saw the same “monster” targeting others (Lindsey Gaetani, himself indirectly), he could finally empathize with Karen’s position. - “You really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position.” - This is profound: empathy isn’t automatic. It required lived experience of the same threat. Hope for Forgiveness - “I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me… because I didn't know what they were capable of.” - He’s not demanding it. He’s hoping. - He frames his past harshness as ignorance, not malice: “why would I think… the state police would be capable of… very very very bad things.” - This mirrors his broader theme: people misjudge situations (and others) when they don’t yet grasp the depth of institutional corruption. 5. Lingering Questions vs. Changed Tone - Crucially, empathy doesn’t mean blind allegiance. - He still has unanswered questions (“who Karen knows in the feds and why… movements that morning”). - But the tone has shifted: he wouldn’t ask them the same way now. The aggression is gone. Respect remains (“very complimentary of Karen's intelligence”). 6. Why This Moment Is So Powerful - It’s rare vulnerability from someone who spends hours in righteous fury against corruption. - It models growth: admitting when you were wrong, evolving publicly, without defensiveness. - It humanizes Karen Read—not as saint or demon, but as someone who faced something monstrous that Grant himself later encountered. - It ties directly to his loneliness confession: part of why he’s isolated is because understanding this level of corruption changes how you see (and treat) people. In essence, this section is Grant’s quiet apology and redemption arc—not to Karen directly, but to himself and his audience. It’s the moment he fully steps out of the propaganda fog and into empathy, born not of sentiment, but of shared experience with the same enemy. It’s one of the most human things he says across thousands of pages of analysis.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,187 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Three days ago I asked myself a dumb question. It was so stupid I was actually ashamed to Google it. Can AI earn money while I sleep? Not saving time. Not automating routine. I mean putting real money into my account while I am not looking at the screen. Everyone says ClawdBot will change how we work. Automation. Task management. Smart replies. But I was sitting in my kitchen thinking about something else entirely. You know that feeling when you look at a tool and realize everyone is using only 1% of its potential? It is like being given a race car and only using it to drive to the store for bread. I decided to test it. I started a notebook. I record everything. > Day One I started with something simple. I gave Clawdbot a task. Find wallets on Polymarket where the numbers do not add up. Where the profit is too high for the win rate. Where the result smells like a system rather than luck. It thought for 14 minutes. I had time to pour a coffee and forget about it. Then the screen flashed. 4 addresses. I scrolled through the first three in a minute. Big bets on politics. They guessed the election. Classic. On the fourth one I stopped. Not because it was the most profitable but because I did not understand what I was looking at. The wallet was not trading politics or sports or anything people write reviews about. It was trading the weather. I read it three times. Weather. Will it be 9 degrees in London tomorrow? Will it rain in Tokyo? These are markets I would not even click on by accident. Then I looked at the numbers. > It started with $27. It is now at $63,853. $27 is two trips to McDonald's. It is nothing. $63,853 is a new car or a down payment on an apartment. It is two years of someone's salary. Between those two numbers was only one thing. Thousands of bets on rain. I closed the tab. Opened it again. Checked if it was a glitch. Real dollars. On markets that look like a bad joke. > Day Two I could not get that wallet out of my head. I went to look at its transaction history. I expected to find one big win that explained everything. A lucky hurricane forecast. Instead I saw thousands of small bets. Boring. "Will the temperature in New York be above 15 degrees?" Then I noticed the detail that finally broke my brain. Its win rate: 33%. It loses more often than it wins. 2 out of 3 bets go to zero. Any normal person with that result would be posting about how the market is unfair. Yet this wallet is sitting on $63,000 in profit. How? I started deconstructing the trades. After an hour I got it. When it loses, it loses 10 or 20 cents. When it wins, it takes $1.00. Loses 9 times in a row? Lost $1.80. Wins 1 time? Got $10.00. > This is not trading. It is math that works as long as you do not interfere with your emotions. Here is how it works. Weather is one of the most predictable things on the planet. Governments invest billions in satellites. Data is updated every 2 or 3 hours. Precision to a tenth of a degree. This data is public. But Polymarket is not a weather station. It updates its markets with a delay of 6 or 8 hours. Imagine the situation. 6 AM. The weather service updated the forecast. The probability that London reaches 9 degrees tomorrow rose to 80%. Algorithms everywhere already recalculated the data. But on Polymarket the YES button is still sitting there for 10 cents. Because the market has not woken up yet. This bot sees the difference. It buys YES for 10 cents when the real probability is already 80%. It is not guessing. It is buying what is essentially already known. It just waits a day and collects the dollar. 10 cents turn into a dollar. On information available to anyone who can read weather APIs. That evening I called a friend. He has been trading for 3 years. He sits in analytical chats. Draws support levels. I asked him: "How was the last month?" "I broke even. The market is tough right now. Too much noise." I looked at the screen. A bot betting on rain with a 33% win rate. Profit: $63,853. My friend with 3 years of experience and hundreds of hours of analysis. Profit: $0. Who is doing it wrong? I am not asking you to take my word for it. The blockchain does not lie: > Day Three I decided to dig deeper. I looked at the wallet description. I expected something complex. A hedge fund. A team of developers. Secret data sources. I found one line: Claude plus public weather APIs. Ordinary Claude. The one on your phone. Connected to free weather services. No secret stations. No insiders. No millions for infrastructure. Just an AI doing what any of us could do. But we are too lazy. Or bored. Or we think it is too simple to work. If someone already built this with basic Claude and free APIs... What happens when Clawdbot gets direct access to trading? > Day Four I watched the wallet in real time. First bet: loss. Second bet: loss. Third bet: loss. I thought: this is it. The statistics are collapsing. Fourth bet: loss. Fifth bet: loss. Down $12 in an hour. I was ready to write a post about how I overestimated this. Sixth bet: Temperature in Chicago. Win. +$87. Seventh bet: Win. +$94. By evening: 9 losses. 5 wins. Daily total: +$385. No emotions. No posts about injustice. No strategy changes after a loss. Just the next bet. I wrote to my friend. The one who has been trading for 3 years. "How was your day?" "Down $200. Market makers caught my stop loss again." I looked at the screen. A bot with no posts and no loud claims. +$385 for the day on rain bets. My friend with 3 years of experience and dozens of books. Minus $200 and a post about how the system is against him. > Day Five I woke up with a thought that kept me up all night. It finally hit me. It is not about the weather. It is not about APIs. It is not that the bot is "smarter". > It is about what the bot does NOT have: an ego that hates being wrong. No urge to revenge-trade. No boredom from repetition. My friend trades against the market. He tries to be smarter than the crowd. This bot trades against human nature. And nature loses every day. Clawdbot found me this wallet in 14 minutes. The weather bot turned $27 into $63,000 on markets everyone else thinks are trash. Both use the same principle. Do something simple. Remove emotions. Repeat. I do not know when Clawdbot will start trading on its own. Maybe in a month. Maybe in a year. But I know one thing. While we discuss if it is possible... Someone already set up their bot and went to live their life. Right now as you read this. Somewhere a weather service updated a forecast. Polymarket is sleeping. The bot is already entering a position. And my friend is writing a post about how market makers do not let honest people earn. Guess who wakes up tomorrow with money in their account?
0:25

Three days ago I asked myself a dumb question. It was so stupid I was actually ashamed to Google it. Can AI earn money while I sleep? Not saving time. Not automating routine. I mean putting real money into my account while I am not looking at the screen. Everyone says ClawdBot will change how we work. Automation. Task management. Smart replies. But I was sitting in my kitchen thinking about something else entirely. You know that feeling when you look at a tool and realize everyone is using only 1% of its potential? It is like being given a race car and only using it to drive to the store for bread. I decided to test it. I started a notebook. I record everything. > Day One I started with something simple. I gave Clawdbot a task. Find wallets on Polymarket where the numbers do not add up. Where the profit is too high for the win rate. Where the result smells like a system rather than luck. It thought for 14 minutes. I had time to pour a coffee and forget about it. Then the screen flashed. 4 addresses. I scrolled through the first three in a minute. Big bets on politics. They guessed the election. Classic. On the fourth one I stopped. Not because it was the most profitable but because I did not understand what I was looking at. The wallet was not trading politics or sports or anything people write reviews about. It was trading the weather. I read it three times. Weather. Will it be 9 degrees in London tomorrow? Will it rain in Tokyo? These are markets I would not even click on by accident. Then I looked at the numbers. > It started with $27. It is now at $63,853. $27 is two trips to McDonald's. It is nothing. $63,853 is a new car or a down payment on an apartment. It is two years of someone's salary. Between those two numbers was only one thing. Thousands of bets on rain. I closed the tab. Opened it again. Checked if it was a glitch. Real dollars. On markets that look like a bad joke. > Day Two I could not get that wallet out of my head. I went to look at its transaction history. I expected to find one big win that explained everything. A lucky hurricane forecast. Instead I saw thousands of small bets. Boring. "Will the temperature in New York be above 15 degrees?" Then I noticed the detail that finally broke my brain. Its win rate: 33%. It loses more often than it wins. 2 out of 3 bets go to zero. Any normal person with that result would be posting about how the market is unfair. Yet this wallet is sitting on $63,000 in profit. How? I started deconstructing the trades. After an hour I got it. When it loses, it loses 10 or 20 cents. When it wins, it takes $1.00. Loses 9 times in a row? Lost $1.80. Wins 1 time? Got $10.00. > This is not trading. It is math that works as long as you do not interfere with your emotions. Here is how it works. Weather is one of the most predictable things on the planet. Governments invest billions in satellites. Data is updated every 2 or 3 hours. Precision to a tenth of a degree. This data is public. But Polymarket is not a weather station. It updates its markets with a delay of 6 or 8 hours. Imagine the situation. 6 AM. The weather service updated the forecast. The probability that London reaches 9 degrees tomorrow rose to 80%. Algorithms everywhere already recalculated the data. But on Polymarket the YES button is still sitting there for 10 cents. Because the market has not woken up yet. This bot sees the difference. It buys YES for 10 cents when the real probability is already 80%. It is not guessing. It is buying what is essentially already known. It just waits a day and collects the dollar. 10 cents turn into a dollar. On information available to anyone who can read weather APIs. That evening I called a friend. He has been trading for 3 years. He sits in analytical chats. Draws support levels. I asked him: "How was the last month?" "I broke even. The market is tough right now. Too much noise." I looked at the screen. A bot betting on rain with a 33% win rate. Profit: $63,853. My friend with 3 years of experience and hundreds of hours of analysis. Profit: $0. Who is doing it wrong? I am not asking you to take my word for it. The blockchain does not lie: > Day Three I decided to dig deeper. I looked at the wallet description. I expected something complex. A hedge fund. A team of developers. Secret data sources. I found one line: Claude plus public weather APIs. Ordinary Claude. The one on your phone. Connected to free weather services. No secret stations. No insiders. No millions for infrastructure. Just an AI doing what any of us could do. But we are too lazy. Or bored. Or we think it is too simple to work. If someone already built this with basic Claude and free APIs... What happens when Clawdbot gets direct access to trading? > Day Four I watched the wallet in real time. First bet: loss. Second bet: loss. Third bet: loss. I thought: this is it. The statistics are collapsing. Fourth bet: loss. Fifth bet: loss. Down $12 in an hour. I was ready to write a post about how I overestimated this. Sixth bet: Temperature in Chicago. Win. +$87. Seventh bet: Win. +$94. By evening: 9 losses. 5 wins. Daily total: +$385. No emotions. No posts about injustice. No strategy changes after a loss. Just the next bet. I wrote to my friend. The one who has been trading for 3 years. "How was your day?" "Down $200. Market makers caught my stop loss again." I looked at the screen. A bot with no posts and no loud claims. +$385 for the day on rain bets. My friend with 3 years of experience and dozens of books. Minus $200 and a post about how the system is against him. > Day Five I woke up with a thought that kept me up all night. It finally hit me. It is not about the weather. It is not about APIs. It is not that the bot is "smarter". > It is about what the bot does NOT have: an ego that hates being wrong. No urge to revenge-trade. No boredom from repetition. My friend trades against the market. He tries to be smarter than the crowd. This bot trades against human nature. And nature loses every day. Clawdbot found me this wallet in 14 minutes. The weather bot turned $27 into $63,000 on markets everyone else thinks are trash. Both use the same principle. Do something simple. Remove emotions. Repeat. I do not know when Clawdbot will start trading on its own. Maybe in a month. Maybe in a year. But I know one thing. While we discuss if it is possible... Someone already set up their bot and went to live their life. Right now as you read this. Somewhere a weather service updated a forecast. Polymarket is sleeping. The bot is already entering a position. And my friend is writing a post about how market makers do not let honest people earn. Guess who wakes up tomorrow with money in their account?

Blaze

29,808 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Ted Gioia thinks our culture is stagnant. Algorithms have us addicted to distraction, Hollywood's out of creative ideas, and people don't read hard books like they used to. 16 lessons about writing and breaking free from dopamine culture: 1. Ted's golden rule for writing: "Always be honest." 2. Three questions to ask yourself when critiquing something: Is it fair? Is it accurate? Will this be persuasive to all fair-minded observers? 3. Struggling as a non-fiction writer? Become an expert in something first. 4. Read slowly. 5. Success won't always come quickly. Ted's career is just now taking off — 50 years after he started writing for publication. 6. People will judge you on your outputs, but you should focus on your inputs. For Ted, that means reading mind-expanding books and listening to music. He does both for 2 hours per day. Then, he writes. 7. What kind of books should you read? Ted says: "Read for mind-expansion, not entertainment, and seek out challenging books." 8. Wondering which book to read? Think of books like drugs and pick up the one that'll give you the greatest out-of-body experience. 9. Do you struggle with writer's block? Do this: (1) buy a blank journal that only you will see, (2) write about something that happened at the end of every day — but there's one rule... you have to be 100% honest, (3) do this every day for a month, and (4) sit back and read what you've written at the end of the month. You'll be surprised by how much good stuff you have. 10. Your high school English teacher was right about this one... write in the margins of your books. 11. After you finish a book, summarize it in your own words. Helps with retention. Think summaries are too time-consuming? If just spent 10 hours reading the book, devoting another hour to synthesizing it is a relatively good time investment. 10-to-1 ratio. 12. Why is our culture stagnant? Consumer brands are increasingly old standbys. Look at video games. Minecraft (launched in 2011), Call of Duty (2003), Grand Theft Auto (1997), Madden NFL (1988), and Super Mario Bros (1985). 13. How about another example? The comic book market driven by the same brand franchises that were dominant in the 60s and 70s. All of the top 20 bestsellers are from Marvel or DC Comics, which were founded in the 1930s. 14. Want a third? Hollywood sequels. They're everywhere now. Top Gun, Spider-Man, John Wick, Mission: Impossible. 15. Music is like cloud storage for societies. That's why the historians in traditional communities were usually singers. Music preserves culture and folklore. 16. Consume old stuff when you're young and new stuff when you're old. This is the opposite of what most people do. Ted is the most well-read person I've met in years. You name it. He's read the book or listened to the album. This guy knows the Western canon. I've linked to the full interview with Ted Gioia below. If you prefer to consume the interview on another platform, you'll find the Apple, Spotify, and YouTube links in the reply tweets.
1:55:01

Ted Gioia thinks our culture is stagnant. Algorithms have us addicted to distraction, Hollywood's out of creative ideas, and people don't read hard books like they used to. 16 lessons about writing and breaking free from dopamine culture: 1. Ted's golden rule for writing: "Always be honest." 2. Three questions to ask yourself when critiquing something: Is it fair? Is it accurate? Will this be persuasive to all fair-minded observers? 3. Struggling as a non-fiction writer? Become an expert in something first. 4. Read slowly. 5. Success won't always come quickly. Ted's career is just now taking off — 50 years after he started writing for publication. 6. People will judge you on your outputs, but you should focus on your inputs. For Ted, that means reading mind-expanding books and listening to music. He does both for 2 hours per day. Then, he writes. 7. What kind of books should you read? Ted says: "Read for mind-expansion, not entertainment, and seek out challenging books." 8. Wondering which book to read? Think of books like drugs and pick up the one that'll give you the greatest out-of-body experience. 9. Do you struggle with writer's block? Do this: (1) buy a blank journal that only you will see, (2) write about something that happened at the end of every day — but there's one rule... you have to be 100% honest, (3) do this every day for a month, and (4) sit back and read what you've written at the end of the month. You'll be surprised by how much good stuff you have. 10. Your high school English teacher was right about this one... write in the margins of your books. 11. After you finish a book, summarize it in your own words. Helps with retention. Think summaries are too time-consuming? If just spent 10 hours reading the book, devoting another hour to synthesizing it is a relatively good time investment. 10-to-1 ratio. 12. Why is our culture stagnant? Consumer brands are increasingly old standbys. Look at video games. Minecraft (launched in 2011), Call of Duty (2003), Grand Theft Auto (1997), Madden NFL (1988), and Super Mario Bros (1985). 13. How about another example? The comic book market driven by the same brand franchises that were dominant in the 60s and 70s. All of the top 20 bestsellers are from Marvel or DC Comics, which were founded in the 1930s. 14. Want a third? Hollywood sequels. They're everywhere now. Top Gun, Spider-Man, John Wick, Mission: Impossible. 15. Music is like cloud storage for societies. That's why the historians in traditional communities were usually singers. Music preserves culture and folklore. 16. Consume old stuff when you're young and new stuff when you're old. This is the opposite of what most people do. Ted is the most well-read person I've met in years. You name it. He's read the book or listened to the album. This guy knows the Western canon. I've linked to the full interview with Ted Gioia below. If you prefer to consume the interview on another platform, you'll find the Apple, Spotify, and YouTube links in the reply tweets.

David Perell

432,898 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren