Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Vibrator USB 12/20 Frequency Single/Double Vibrating Eggs Multispeed G Spot Vibrator Sex Toys For Men Women Adult Products

SMOOCH PK

4,505 subscribers

26,306 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Clitoral Sucking Licking Vibrator Vibrating Dildo Clitoris Nipple Stimulator G point Clit Rose Vibrators Adult Sex Toys

Sensitive content

Clitoral Sucking Licking Vibrator Vibrating Dildo Clitoris Nipple Stimulator G point Clit Rose Vibrators Adult Sex Toys

Sex Toys Pk

28,392 views • 1 year ago

Womanizer Classic 2 Clitoral Sucking Toy - Clit Stimulator with 10 Suction Speeds - Waterproof Sucker Vibrator - Rechargeable Vibrating Adult Sex Toys for Women and Couples - Black

Womanizer Classic 2 Clitoral Sucking Toy - Clit Stimulator with 10 Suction Speeds - Waterproof Sucker Vibrator - Rechargeable Vibrating Adult Sex Toys for Women and Couples - Black

Sex Toys Pk

19,411 views • 1 year ago

Vibrator with 6 Vibrations, Adult Sex Toy, Vibrating Prostate Massager with Ring, Sex Toy for Men and Couple

Vibrator with 6 Vibrations, Adult Sex Toy, Vibrating Prostate Massager with Ring, Sex Toy for Men and Couple

Sex Toys Pk

18,124 views • 1 year ago

Remote Control Vibrator Dildo Panties for Women Wireless Vibrating Egg Wearable Panties Vibrators G Spot Stimulator Get Latest Price

Sensitive content

Remote Control Vibrator Dildo Panties for Women Wireless Vibrating Egg Wearable Panties Vibrators G Spot Stimulator Get Latest Price

Sex Toys Pk

18,739 views • 1 year ago

Rabbit Vibrator Sex Toy for Women Purple Dildo Clitoral Vibrators with 10 Vibrations & Warming Function Clitoris & G Spot Double Stimulation

Rabbit Vibrator Sex Toy for Women Purple Dildo Clitoral Vibrators with 10 Vibrations & Warming Function Clitoris & G Spot Double Stimulation

SexualBus

20,035 views • 3 years ago

Rabbit, double dildo, nipples, stimulator, and G spot vibrator comes with 10 thrusting and vibrating modes for clit mouth and nipples 😍 Sold by- Zhentongkeji Lotty_Luc133

Rabbit, double dildo, nipples, stimulator, and G spot vibrator comes with 10 thrusting and vibrating modes for clit mouth and nipples 😍 Sold by- Zhentongkeji Lotty_Luc133

TsKayana

11,004 views • 1 year ago

10 Speeds Prostate Massager Anal Vibrator Male Masturbator Butt Plug Vibrators Sex Toys Prostate Stimulator For Men Gays

Sensitive content

10 Speeds Prostate Massager Anal Vibrator Male Masturbator Butt Plug Vibrators Sex Toys Prostate Stimulator For Men Gays

SMOOCH PK

24,130 views • 1 year ago

Thanks, , for my cyber purple Enigma Double Sonic G-Spot vibrator! Friends, grab yours at or check out everything else they offer. And have fun! 😉

Thanks, , for my cyber purple Enigma Double Sonic G-Spot vibrator! Friends, grab yours at or check out everything else they offer. And have fun! 😉

Amy Taylor

12,187 views • 11 months ago

Male Penis Ring for Men Delay Ejaculation Stronger Erection Double Cocking Rings Masturbating Sex Toys for Man Gay Adult 18+

Sensitive content

Male Penis Ring for Men Delay Ejaculation Stronger Erection Double Cocking Rings Masturbating Sex Toys for Man Gay Adult 18+

SMOOCH PK

14,500 views • 2 years ago

Today marks the first anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling which clarified that the terms ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in the Equality Act refer to biological sex, biological woman and biological man. This landmark judgment vindicated countless men and women who were silenced or shut down for expressing the lawfully held, gender-critical view that women are adult human females. While the Government’s Women and Equalities Minister, Bridget Phillipson, claimed this week that the Government has always defended single-sex spaces, where was their support for women like Sandie Peggie, Jennifer Melle and the Darlington nurses? Gender-critical cases remain the single largest category of cases we deal with at the Free Speech Union. Following Maya Forstater’s victory in 2021, and now this Supreme Court ruling, there is no excuse for discriminating against people who express gender-critical views. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw 👇

Today marks the first anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling which clarified that the terms ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in the Equality Act refer to biological sex, biological woman and biological man. This landmark judgment vindicated countless men and women who were silenced or shut down for expressing the lawfully held, gender-critical view that women are adult human females. While the Government’s Women and Equalities Minister, Bridget Phillipson, claimed this week that the Government has always defended single-sex spaces, where was their support for women like Sandie Peggie, Jennifer Melle and the Darlington nurses? Gender-critical cases remain the single largest category of cases we deal with at the Free Speech Union. Following Maya Forstater’s victory in 2021, and now this Supreme Court ruling, there is no excuse for discriminating against people who express gender-critical views. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw 👇

The Free Speech Union

13,255 views • 2 months ago

In 2003, at 29 years old, I influenced Vince McMahon and team to change the WWE business model - embracing their classic roster in consumer products. That became Classic Superstars. It changed wrestling and toys. It was a mass toy brand primarily focused on the adult collector. Series 1 included Ultimate Warrior and Bret Hart - both were in active or recent lawsuits with the company. The strategy was to purposefully include superstar, main roster and mid-card talent so as to signal to the adult wrestling fan - this is going to be a deep dive, for you the fan. The Attitude Era had ended. Wrestling figures as toys were just no longer working. This strategy, over the next 7 years, would turn WWE into the #1 action figure brand by 2009… and forever cement the adult collector as a critical consumer in mass toy and collectible development. 20 years ago the adult collector was the #4 consumer segment behind pre-school, age 6-11 and age 11-14. Today, it’s the largest single segment in all of toys and collecting. In this rare media clip from Toy Fair 2005, I talk about “20 years from now.” 20 years from now is today. I’m proud of my contributions to this movement - toys as a serious form of collectibles, for adults, and for secondary market value. Thanks to Ringside Collectibles for the footage. And for Matt Cardona Brian Myers and The Major Wrestling Figure Podcast for keeping the history of collecting alive and well.

Jeremy Padawer

104,080 views • 1 year ago

** An open letter to Anthony Albanese ** Dear Prime Minister Albanese, Let’s get one thing clear: women are adult human females. You know it, I know it, you even said it in the lead up to the last election when asked “what is a woman” by Piers Morgan. But we have a big problem. I’m sure you have heard, last week, the Federal Court delivered its judgment in Giggle v Tickle, the “what is a woman” legal case that has been fighting in federal court for the past four years. To put it very simply, there are two sides to this case: women, adult human females, who want to ensure that woman is a single-sex category in law and women & girls have access to single sex spaces. The other side, which includes your human rights commission, insists that men who claim to be women are women in the eyes of the law. The full Federal Court sided with the man who claims to be a woman. Yes. A male won the “what is a woman” court case. Giggle v Tickle has turned Australia into an international laughing stock. This decision is seismic. It means women cannot run women-only businesses for women. It confirms that the ordinary meaning of sex has been twisted beyond recognition. It means men can be women in law. The Australian Human Rights Commission, captured by ideology, has weaponised the sex discrimination act against women, the very demographic it was enacted to protect. They’ve even argued in court that men who claim to be women need pregnancy protections. They’ve pushed the view that sex is a spectrum, changeable, and that anyone objecting is the bigot. Is this something you agree with? Do you, Mr Prime Minister, think men need pregnancy protections in the law? And there are real-world stakes here: Girls at school are holding their bladders all day, refusing to drink water, because boys who claim to be girls are in their bathrooms and they don’t want them there. Women prisoners are locked in cells with male sex offenders who simply “identify” as women. Female athletes are losing podiums, matches and safety. This isn’t inclusion - it’s the demise of women’s rights. Prime Minister, some of your ministers say, “we need to protect trans rights”. With all due respect, sir, your government can protect so called trans rights without stripping rights from women and girls. Every other citizen manages to exist without demanding access to the opposite sex’s protected spaces. Why not try to get “trans rights” without destroying the rights of women and girls? Have you ever even tried? The fact that Labor hasn’t even mentioned Giggle v Tickle and women’s rights - while Liberals, Nationals, and One Nation politicians speak out - tells us everything. This week has been silence from the Labor Party. No trans visibility day parades on this one. No pride posts. Why? What don’t you want Australians to know? You boast about your 50 per cent women in cabinet. Good for you - you can accurately recognise what a woman is when it suits you. But the rest of us aren’t allowed to without fear of punishment. And can I ask, if you filled that cabinet with 50 per cent trans women, would you still call it equality between men and women? Think about that. While the UK, the United States and even New Zealand are waking up, rolling back the nonsense and restoring sanity and realizing that gender ideology is a failed experiment, your government is turning Australia into the laughing stock of the world. “Giggle v Tickle” isn’t just a punchline overseas - it’s proof Australia is upside down. I want to tell you something really important: If you will lie about something as obvious as men being women, we can assume you will look us in the eye and lie about everything. Tell the truth. Fix the Sex Discrimination Act. Reinstate clear biological, accurate definitions of man and woman. Protect women, girls and single-sex spaces. Actually do something. Because, at the moment, Mister Prime Minister, I’m doing your job for you.

An open letter to Anthony Albanese Dear Prime Minister Albanese, Let’s get one thing clear: women are adult human females. You know it, I know it, you even said it in the lead up to the last election when asked “what is a woman” by Piers Morgan. But we have a big problem. I’m sure you have heard, last week, the Federal Court delivered its judgment in Giggle v Tickle, the “what is a woman” legal case that has been fighting in federal court for the past four years. To put it very simply, there are two sides to this case: women, adult human females, who want to ensure that woman is a single-sex category in law and women & girls have access to single sex spaces. The other side, which includes your human rights commission, insists that men who claim to be women are women in the eyes of the law. The full Federal Court sided with the man who claims to be a woman. Yes. A male won the “what is a woman” court case. Giggle v Tickle has turned Australia into an international laughing stock. This decision is seismic. It means women cannot run women-only businesses for women. It confirms that the ordinary meaning of sex has been twisted beyond recognition. It means men can be women in law. The Australian Human Rights Commission, captured by ideology, has weaponised the sex discrimination act against women, the very demographic it was enacted to protect. They’ve even argued in court that men who claim to be women need pregnancy protections. They’ve pushed the view that sex is a spectrum, changeable, and that anyone objecting is the bigot. Is this something you agree with? Do you, Mr Prime Minister, think men need pregnancy protections in the law? And there are real-world stakes here: Girls at school are holding their bladders all day, refusing to drink water, because boys who claim to be girls are in their bathrooms and they don’t want them there. Women prisoners are locked in cells with male sex offenders who simply “identify” as women. Female athletes are losing podiums, matches and safety. This isn’t inclusion - it’s the demise of women’s rights. Prime Minister, some of your ministers say, “we need to protect trans rights”. With all due respect, sir, your government can protect so called trans rights without stripping rights from women and girls. Every other citizen manages to exist without demanding access to the opposite sex’s protected spaces. Why not try to get “trans rights” without destroying the rights of women and girls? Have you ever even tried? The fact that Labor hasn’t even mentioned Giggle v Tickle and women’s rights - while Liberals, Nationals, and One Nation politicians speak out - tells us everything. This week has been silence from the Labor Party. No trans visibility day parades on this one. No pride posts. Why? What don’t you want Australians to know? You boast about your 50 per cent women in cabinet. Good for you - you can accurately recognise what a woman is when it suits you. But the rest of us aren’t allowed to without fear of punishment. And can I ask, if you filled that cabinet with 50 per cent trans women, would you still call it equality between men and women? Think about that. While the UK, the United States and even New Zealand are waking up, rolling back the nonsense and restoring sanity and realizing that gender ideology is a failed experiment, your government is turning Australia into the laughing stock of the world. “Giggle v Tickle” isn’t just a punchline overseas - it’s proof Australia is upside down. I want to tell you something really important: If you will lie about something as obvious as men being women, we can assume you will look us in the eye and lie about everything. Tell the truth. Fix the Sex Discrimination Act. Reinstate clear biological, accurate definitions of man and woman. Protect women, girls and single-sex spaces. Actually do something. Because, at the moment, Mister Prime Minister, I’m doing your job for you.

Sall Grover

95,713 views • 1 month ago

No one seemed to want to answer the important question regarding the M&S in Colchester. Are there any spaces just for men or just for women or are they all "gender neutral"/Mixed Sex? So I rang them. The woman in the recent video said they were "breaking the law". They aren't. Marks and Spencer told me that they have 6 changing spaces LOCATED within the Men's dept. 6 spaces LOCATED within the women's department. All 12 are mixed sex and available to everyone. They are not marked as single sex spaces because they aren't single sex. Audio recording below. I did not give Yvonne the customer services representative a hard time because I was not making a complaint, I was getting clarification and info about the store's changing provision and she is not responsible for producing Marks and Spencer policy. The company policy dictating this mixed sex changing arrangement throughout the store is legal. This is the entire problem. Women have been misled to think single-sex changing spaces have now been returned to them. That would be a lie. Marks and Spencer and others can continue to provide spaces unacceptable and unsafe to women. They can do it within the remit of the Equality Act. For women to be safe there needs to be a change to the law which insists on women having single sex space to change or go to the toilet. That has not been achieved by any court ruling or guidance around the Equality Act and GC groups who mostly applauded the recently released 'Code of Practice' know this because they are stuffed full of lawyers. The man in the video may have terrible customer service skills, he may even be prejudiced against women with GC views, but the policy is legal. Grassroots activism on behalf of women might eventually force a change from providers. It is probably all that could, because the Equality Act remains rigidly against us. Yet the grassroots have previously been frowned upon and sneered at for our shouty ways while the GC Suits "handle everything professionally". The woman in the store accused a man of "breaking the law" which he wasn't. Now we have one of the Sex Matters lawyers exposing that employee's details online. What a mess.

No one seemed to want to answer the important question regarding the M&S in Colchester. Are there any spaces just for men or just for women or are they all "gender neutral"/Mixed Sex? So I rang them. The woman in the recent video said they were "breaking the law". They aren't. Marks and Spencer told me that they have 6 changing spaces LOCATED within the Men's dept. 6 spaces LOCATED within the women's department. All 12 are mixed sex and available to everyone. They are not marked as single sex spaces because they aren't single sex. Audio recording below. I did not give Yvonne the customer services representative a hard time because I was not making a complaint, I was getting clarification and info about the store's changing provision and she is not responsible for producing Marks and Spencer policy. The company policy dictating this mixed sex changing arrangement throughout the store is legal. This is the entire problem. Women have been misled to think single-sex changing spaces have now been returned to them. That would be a lie. Marks and Spencer and others can continue to provide spaces unacceptable and unsafe to women. They can do it within the remit of the Equality Act. For women to be safe there needs to be a change to the law which insists on women having single sex space to change or go to the toilet. That has not been achieved by any court ruling or guidance around the Equality Act and GC groups who mostly applauded the recently released 'Code of Practice' know this because they are stuffed full of lawyers. The man in the video may have terrible customer service skills, he may even be prejudiced against women with GC views, but the policy is legal. Grassroots activism on behalf of women might eventually force a change from providers. It is probably all that could, because the Equality Act remains rigidly against us. Yet the grassroots have previously been frowned upon and sneered at for our shouty ways while the GC Suits "handle everything professionally". The woman in the store accused a man of "breaking the law" which he wasn't. Now we have one of the Sex Matters lawyers exposing that employee's details online. What a mess.

Jean Hatchet

93,498 views • 1 month ago

Check out this recent Resolving Reality podcast with the brilliant Youtuber and commentator Christine Grace Smith Christine Grace Smith We discuss the impacts of feminism on the modern female, on men, and society as a whole, and some of the crazy behaviour we've been seeing in recent times. And perhaps most importantly - Sydney Sweeney's boobs get a mention. What an excellent and sometimes hilarious discussion🔥 Reposts appreciated 👍 Youtube version is down below 👇 00:00 - Start 01:13 - Intro 02:00 - Christine joins us 02:33 - How she got started on Youtube 04:59 - A mostly male audience 05:52 - Why she didn't become feminist herself 09:12 - Did her opinions create conflicts 11:29 - The 'sisterhood' problem 15:10 - How widespread the lunacy is 18:55 - The affects of all this on society 21:25 - Relations have become more miserable 21:45 - Emmet is a misogynist 22:45 - Can women survive without men? 26:45 - Females becoming more masculine 32:40 - Double-standards in behaviour 35:45 - The "provider' thing and cherry-picking 39:40 - Females making excuses for bad behaviour 43:51 - Emmet's struggles 44:30 - Spoiled for choice and commodification 47:20 - Bonnie Blue's compassion 49:30 - Objectification 53:55 - Sydney "Massive Jugs" Sweeney 55:15 - Using attractiveness for positive reasons 57:20 - How entitled behaviour stunts personal evolution 58:55 - Struggle leading to fulfilment 1:02:35 - Feminism leading women astray 1:04:40 - Should men stop treating women well? 1:09:30 - Males shunning problematic females 1:12:00 - Men challenging this behaviour more 1:13:40 - The system is biased against males 1:16:05 - Discouraging young females away from feminism 1:19:30 - Christine's new channel and future plans 1:20:40 - Outro 1:21:15 - Closing spiel

Check out this recent Resolving Reality podcast with the brilliant Youtuber and commentator Christine Grace Smith Christine Grace Smith We discuss the impacts of feminism on the modern female, on men, and society as a whole, and some of the crazy behaviour we've been seeing in recent times. And perhaps most importantly - Sydney Sweeney's boobs get a mention. What an excellent and sometimes hilarious discussion🔥 Reposts appreciated 👍 Youtube version is down below 👇 00:00 - Start 01:13 - Intro 02:00 - Christine joins us 02:33 - How she got started on Youtube 04:59 - A mostly male audience 05:52 - Why she didn't become feminist herself 09:12 - Did her opinions create conflicts 11:29 - The 'sisterhood' problem 15:10 - How widespread the lunacy is 18:55 - The affects of all this on society 21:25 - Relations have become more miserable 21:45 - Emmet is a misogynist 22:45 - Can women survive without men? 26:45 - Females becoming more masculine 32:40 - Double-standards in behaviour 35:45 - The "provider' thing and cherry-picking 39:40 - Females making excuses for bad behaviour 43:51 - Emmet's struggles 44:30 - Spoiled for choice and commodification 47:20 - Bonnie Blue's compassion 49:30 - Objectification 53:55 - Sydney "Massive Jugs" Sweeney 55:15 - Using attractiveness for positive reasons 57:20 - How entitled behaviour stunts personal evolution 58:55 - Struggle leading to fulfilment 1:02:35 - Feminism leading women astray 1:04:40 - Should men stop treating women well? 1:09:30 - Males shunning problematic females 1:12:00 - Men challenging this behaviour more 1:13:40 - The system is biased against males 1:16:05 - Discouraging young females away from feminism 1:19:30 - Christine's new channel and future plans 1:20:40 - Outro 1:21:15 - Closing spiel

Emmet Connor

86,007 views • 2 months ago

“I can define a woman… I just take an inclusive approach.” This means she includes men in her definition of women. Ffs. There is a lot to unpack in this snide & immature clip. First of all, Amanda Camm MP is correct: you cannot protect women if you can’t define them. Otherwise, who are you protecting? How are you catering to specific needs? How are you helping a woman whose protection involves single-sex care? Words only purpose is that they have objective meaning. Next, an inclusive approach to the definition of women is… only including women. That’s what inclusivity actually is. Allowing men to be classed as women simply turns the category of woman into a mixed sexed category. It dismantles the category. It’s not inclusive, it’s destructive. Then, she calls defining a woman as importing Trumpian-style politics to Australia. This is laughably stupid. Trump didn’t decide what a woman is, he acknowledged that accurately defining women in law & society was a no brainer political win & ceased upon the opportunity. If you do want to talk about importing American ideologies, that conversation will be about gender ideology. You don’t have an issue with importing problems, only the solution. Not wanting to stop with the stupidity, she then says that it’s all a distraction from the actual issue: men’s violence against women. Who and what are you talking about? If those words aren’t defined, the statement makes no sense. I’ll prove it: in the event there is male violence against men who claim to be women, that is going to be for a very different reason than men’s violence against women, requiring different plans & solutions. See, even to defend your stupid ideology it’s important to have correct definitions so everyone gets the correct help. Finally, she mocks being told it’s tokenistic to wear purple to support the “queer community”. It’s so pathetic, I’m not even going to bother commenting on it. When she was the Minister for Women, Shannon Fentiman blocked me because I said that a woman is an adult human female. She ignored pleas from me and many Queensland-based women to meet with her to discuss our opposition to self ID laws. She says she is not ashamed of her stance but she should be. She is ignoring women in favor of men, proving in actions instead of words that she knows *exactly* what a woman is.

“I can define a woman… I just take an inclusive approach.” This means she includes men in her definition of women. Ffs. There is a lot to unpack in this snide & immature clip. First of all, Amanda Camm MP is correct: you cannot protect women if you can’t define them. Otherwise, who are you protecting? How are you catering to specific needs? How are you helping a woman whose protection involves single-sex care? Words only purpose is that they have objective meaning. Next, an inclusive approach to the definition of women is… only including women. That’s what inclusivity actually is. Allowing men to be classed as women simply turns the category of woman into a mixed sexed category. It dismantles the category. It’s not inclusive, it’s destructive. Then, she calls defining a woman as importing Trumpian-style politics to Australia. This is laughably stupid. Trump didn’t decide what a woman is, he acknowledged that accurately defining women in law & society was a no brainer political win & ceased upon the opportunity. If you do want to talk about importing American ideologies, that conversation will be about gender ideology. You don’t have an issue with importing problems, only the solution. Not wanting to stop with the stupidity, she then says that it’s all a distraction from the actual issue: men’s violence against women. Who and what are you talking about? If those words aren’t defined, the statement makes no sense. I’ll prove it: in the event there is male violence against men who claim to be women, that is going to be for a very different reason than men’s violence against women, requiring different plans & solutions. See, even to defend your stupid ideology it’s important to have correct definitions so everyone gets the correct help. Finally, she mocks being told it’s tokenistic to wear purple to support the “queer community”. It’s so pathetic, I’m not even going to bother commenting on it. When she was the Minister for Women, Shannon Fentiman blocked me because I said that a woman is an adult human female. She ignored pleas from me and many Queensland-based women to meet with her to discuss our opposition to self ID laws. She says she is not ashamed of her stance but she should be. She is ignoring women in favor of men, proving in actions instead of words that she knows exactly what a woman is.

Sall Grover

40,674 views • 10 months ago

The new Huberman Lab episode is out: Protect & Improve Your Hearing & Brain Health | Dr. Konstantina Stankovic 0:00 Konstantina Stankovic 3:27 Hearing Loss, How Hearing Works, Types of Hearing Loss 10:58 Sound Waves, High vs Low Frequency, Communication, Importance of Hearing 15:26 Sponsors: Wealthfront & Our Place 18:40 Sound Projection, Intensity, Speech; Moving Ears; Larger Ears 22:59 Sounds & Emotionality; Tinnitus 26:43 Painful Sounds, Hyperacusis, Phonophobia; Memory, Auditory Hallucinations 32:19 Concerts & Ringing in Ears, Hidden Hearing Loss; Tool: Safe Sound Threshold 39:15 Concerts & Protecting Hearing, Tools: Ear Plugs, Magnesium Threonate 43:44 Magnesium Food Sources & Supplements; Migraines & Tinnitus 47:30 Tinnitus; Hearing Loss, Genetic & Environmental Factors 53:19 Sponsors: AGZ by AG1 & David 56:04 Individualization; Tinnitus Examination & Treatment, Supplementation? 1:04:36 Headphones, Tough vs Tender Ears, Children, Tool: Safe Sound Levels 1:09:41 Compounded Damage, Concerts & Hearing Loss, Tool: Ear Plugs 1:12:59 Transitioning Environments, Hyperacusis; In-Utero Hearing 1:15:56 Dogs & Sea Animals, Sound Pollution 1:19:54 Hearing Loss, Dementia & Cognitive Decline; Tool: Slow Speech & Face Listener 1:26:26 Sponsor: Joovv 1:27:38 Lip Reading; AI-Enhanced Hearing Aids 1:30:12 Sleep, Tool: Earplugs; Hearing Yourself Speak, Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence 1:36:54 Hearing & Balance, Vibrations; Sound Therapy 1:42:05 Music, Dance, Hearing & Frequency Map; Cochlear Implants 1:48:20 Sponsor: LMNT 1:49:52 Hearing & Social-Cognitive Development, Mental Health; Cochlear Implants 1:56:07 Men vs Women, Estrogen; Hearing Loss, Environment, NSAIDs 2:01:52 Environmental Toxins, Heavy Metals, Plastics; Tool: Heating Plastic 2:06:39 Tool: Avoid Regular NSAIDs Use; Birds & Hair Cell Regeneration; Cancer 2:12:05 Head & Neck, Lymphatic System & Surgery 2:14:44 Adult Auditory Plasticity, Music & Language 2:17:37 Splitting of Senses, Podcasts, AI & Human Progress 2:22:20 Prevent Hearing Loss & Recap 2:25:09 Zero-Cost Support, YouTube, Spotify & Apple Follow, Reviews & Feedback, Sponsors, Protocols Book, Social Media, Neural Network Newsletter Includes paid partnerships.

The new Huberman Lab episode is out: Protect & Improve Your Hearing & Brain Health | Dr. Konstantina Stankovic 0:00 Konstantina Stankovic 3:27 Hearing Loss, How Hearing Works, Types of Hearing Loss 10:58 Sound Waves, High vs Low Frequency, Communication, Importance of Hearing 15:26 Sponsors: Wealthfront & Our Place 18:40 Sound Projection, Intensity, Speech; Moving Ears; Larger Ears 22:59 Sounds & Emotionality; Tinnitus 26:43 Painful Sounds, Hyperacusis, Phonophobia; Memory, Auditory Hallucinations 32:19 Concerts & Ringing in Ears, Hidden Hearing Loss; Tool: Safe Sound Threshold 39:15 Concerts & Protecting Hearing, Tools: Ear Plugs, Magnesium Threonate 43:44 Magnesium Food Sources & Supplements; Migraines & Tinnitus 47:30 Tinnitus; Hearing Loss, Genetic & Environmental Factors 53:19 Sponsors: AGZ by AG1 & David 56:04 Individualization; Tinnitus Examination & Treatment, Supplementation? 1:04:36 Headphones, Tough vs Tender Ears, Children, Tool: Safe Sound Levels 1:09:41 Compounded Damage, Concerts & Hearing Loss, Tool: Ear Plugs 1:12:59 Transitioning Environments, Hyperacusis; In-Utero Hearing 1:15:56 Dogs & Sea Animals, Sound Pollution 1:19:54 Hearing Loss, Dementia & Cognitive Decline; Tool: Slow Speech & Face Listener 1:26:26 Sponsor: Joovv 1:27:38 Lip Reading; AI-Enhanced Hearing Aids 1:30:12 Sleep, Tool: Earplugs; Hearing Yourself Speak, Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence 1:36:54 Hearing & Balance, Vibrations; Sound Therapy 1:42:05 Music, Dance, Hearing & Frequency Map; Cochlear Implants 1:48:20 Sponsor: LMNT 1:49:52 Hearing & Social-Cognitive Development, Mental Health; Cochlear Implants 1:56:07 Men vs Women, Estrogen; Hearing Loss, Environment, NSAIDs 2:01:52 Environmental Toxins, Heavy Metals, Plastics; Tool: Heating Plastic 2:06:39 Tool: Avoid Regular NSAIDs Use; Birds & Hair Cell Regeneration; Cancer 2:12:05 Head & Neck, Lymphatic System & Surgery 2:14:44 Adult Auditory Plasticity, Music & Language 2:17:37 Splitting of Senses, Podcasts, AI & Human Progress 2:22:20 Prevent Hearing Loss & Recap 2:25:09 Zero-Cost Support, YouTube, Spotify & Apple Follow, Reviews & Feedback, Sponsors, Protocols Book, Social Media, Neural Network Newsletter Includes paid partnerships.

Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

284,784 views • 9 months ago

US Taxpayers subsidize Coca Cola $10 BILLION dollars every year Congress has been cleverly hiding the funding in the annual “Farm bill” “Congress subsidizes Coca Cola to the tune of about $10,000,000,000 of taxpayer money every single year — We have this scam, otherwise known as the farm bill, which really should be known as the food stamp and big corporation bill passed by congress. The last one that we passed, the total amount was $428,000,000,000 with a b dollars and $328 billion of that $428 billion went directly to food stamp recipients to SNAP. — The government loads $328 billion of your tax care money on the EBT cards for SNAP recipients, and they go into the stores and they buy Coca Cola products, Frito Lay products, Pepsi products. This $10,000,000,000 is just to Coca Cola every year. Coca Cola gets between 5-20% of their annual revenue from the taxpayer dime. Ding ding ding. That right there is government waste. We could cut because if your products are so great and healthy for everybody. Why don't you stand on your own two feet, Coca Cola? Why don't you just operate without taxpayer money if you're so great? And the cherry on top is how our legislators have figured out they can play this little game and go back to their home voters and tell them how evil the farmers and ranchers are because of the farm bill and the subsidies. Meanwhile, 3/4 of it doesn't even go to the farmers, and it goes to all their buddies in big corporations. That's what your government has done. Congress, men, and women come back home and have the audacity to lie to the American people about what they have done to the American people's food supply.“

US Taxpayers subsidize Coca Cola $10 BILLION dollars every year Congress has been cleverly hiding the funding in the annual “Farm bill” “Congress subsidizes Coca Cola to the tune of about $10,000,000,000 of taxpayer money every single year — We have this scam, otherwise known as the farm bill, which really should be known as the food stamp and big corporation bill passed by congress. The last one that we passed, the total amount was $428,000,000,000 with a b dollars and $328 billion of that $428 billion went directly to food stamp recipients to SNAP. — The government loads $328 billion of your tax care money on the EBT cards for SNAP recipients, and they go into the stores and they buy Coca Cola products, Frito Lay products, Pepsi products. This $10,000,000,000 is just to Coca Cola every year. Coca Cola gets between 5-20% of their annual revenue from the taxpayer dime. Ding ding ding. That right there is government waste. We could cut because if your products are so great and healthy for everybody. Why don't you stand on your own two feet, Coca Cola? Why don't you just operate without taxpayer money if you're so great? And the cherry on top is how our legislators have figured out they can play this little game and go back to their home voters and tell them how evil the farmers and ranchers are because of the farm bill and the subsidies. Meanwhile, 3/4 of it doesn't even go to the farmers, and it goes to all their buddies in big corporations. That's what your government has done. Congress, men, and women come back home and have the audacity to lie to the American people about what they have done to the American people's food supply.“

Wall Street Apes

1,351,148 views • 1 year ago