Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Victor Davis Hanson: The Atomic Bombs Stopped a Far Bloodier War The planned invasion of Japan could have cost hundreds of thousands—or potentially a million—American casualties, following the staggering losses at Okinawa. Good men made a bad weapon to stop far worse men from killing innocents, and that's the...

62,949 views • 24 days ago •via X (Twitter)

33 Comments

Leslie Jenkins's profile picture
Leslie Jenkins23 days ago

Victor is one of the oldest shekel whores in the hasbara business.

Pete LaPlace's profile picture
Pete LaPlace23 days ago

If Japan had developed the atomic bomb first and dropped it on Philadelphia, Boston, Los Angeles etc until the United States surrendered, would douchebags like this say, "well, at least it saved lives because Japan didn't have to invade American territory." ?

eg042680's profile picture
eg04268023 days ago

This is an old bullshit narrative.

Ali from Cali 🦹‍♀️'s profile picture
Ali from Cali 🦹‍♀️23 days ago

Hard no. It was wrong. We need to learn from our mistakes. Nothing justifies the torturous and slow death we gave hundreds of thousands of innocent children, women and Japanese Catholic communities.

Losers' History's profile picture
Losers' History23 days ago

This is, of course, a lie. Japan agreed to surrender, with the condition that the emperor stay in power. Truman rejected this and hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki. After the Japanese surrendered, unconditionally, the US allowed the Emperor to stay in power. There are far more lies in the official story, but this one, alone, destroys the narrative.

Nathan Roberts's profile picture
Nathan Roberts23 days ago

You contradict yourself. You make the case that innocents were saved. But I guess their innocents didnt matter.

Masterpiece Retouched's profile picture
Masterpiece Retouched23 days ago

Japan had already sued for peace BEFORE the nuclear weapons were deployed The narrative of a costly ground invasion as the only alternative is pure propaganda

iang's profile picture
iang23 days ago

The War was already over when the bombs were dropped -all the Generals knew this because they were already negotiating the surrender and dealing with the last sensitive issue of the Emperor. After Truman dropped the bombs, they invented the narrative you say above. Because.

B Miller's profile picture
B Miller23 days ago

No fucking way are nuclear bombs okay.

MG's profile picture
MG23 days ago

"The Fog of War" is a great documentary. Even though Robert McNamara is often regarded as one of the architects of the Vietnam war, he completely redeemed himself in his later years.

Emperor's profile picture
Emperor23 days ago

I hope this man has children. Cause I know damn well that the cascade of events that will follow the nuking of Iran will end his entire bloodline. Nuke Iran, Russia will nuke Ukraine to solve their own problems. And North Korea will suddenly get a bright idea.

Cookie2moi's profile picture
Cookie2moi23 days ago

dumb fuck old fart.

Sylvanistan's profile picture
Sylvanistan23 days ago

Stupid old fool.

Kim 🦋's profile picture
Kim 🦋23 days ago

He needs to be put in a psych ward

Little Mac 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 🇵🇸's profile picture
Little Mac 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 🇵🇸23 days ago

Actually, modern historians now agree it was the Russian invasion of Manchuria that REALLY did it.

Libuse: FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA 🇵🇸🌍🧹♀️'s profile picture
Libuse: FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA 🇵🇸🌍🧹♀️23 days ago

Pure rubbish. It was to show US superior weapons to the USSR. "A 1946 U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey concluded that Japan would have surrendered before the end of the year anyway, even without the atomic bombs or a land invasion."

lowiqchud's profile picture
lowiqchud23 days ago

Japan was ready to make peace. But the US wanted more. They needed unconditional surrender, so they could occupy the country and infect it with liberalism. That's why they used the nukes.

Kim 🦋's profile picture
Kim 🦋23 days ago

American soldiers shouldn’t have been in Japan. American soldiers shouldn’t be anywhere but on American soil

𝕳𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖞 🏴's profile picture
𝕳𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖞 🏴23 days ago

Hanson doesn’t give a fuck about the younger generations which would have to deal with the literal and political fallout America would suffer should we make such a grave mistake.

SurfaceTech06's profile picture
SurfaceTech0623 days ago

Someone arrest this guy

Nic's profile picture
Nic23 days ago

Iran can survive a nuke and you be damn sure they will retaliate in same magnitude if not worse. Can israel survive a nuke?

Monarda B. Allen's profile picture
Monarda B. Allen23 days ago

President Eisenhower didn't agree.

Greg's profile picture
Greg23 days ago

Even 50 nukes would not defeat Iran. This guy is an imbecile, NOT an intellectual. Opening the door for every country on earth to use nukes willy nilly? Insanity.

Carlos Euler's profile picture
Carlos Euler23 days ago

Disgusting war crimes apologia, more disturbingly still is the fact that it’s being deployed to justify nuclear strikes against a non-nuclear country that didn’t start the war. If Trump is foolish enough to do this, Russia, China and others will change first strike policy

carol's profile picture
carol23 days ago

Japan started the war. What did Iran do to justify using a nuclear weapon on them. We started the war with Iran for another country. Instead of thinking about nuclear weapons against Iran, President Trump should realize that the best move for the American people would be for him to withdraw from the war in Iran walk away before more innocent people get murdered

Šāpur III | Shapur III | 𐭱𐭧𐭯𐭥𐭧𐭥𐭩's profile picture
Šāpur III | Shapur III | 𐭱𐭧𐭯𐭥𐭧𐭥𐭩23 days ago

Old man forgot to take his meds I guess.

I Am Who I Am's profile picture
I Am Who I Am23 days ago

How many innocent's and civilians were killed by the bombs? How many women and children? K thanks

Stephan Chadwick's profile picture
Stephan Chadwick23 days ago

I'm staggered by who still uses this narrative as an example. Total deaths from the bombings approximately 200k. 80-90% were civilians. You bombed cities and killed random people you sick fark.

Diabeetus's profile picture
Diabeetus23 days ago

Revisionist history. It’s well documented that there were only two reason we dropped the weapons on Japan, one to learn the effects on a “live target”, two, to send a message to Russia. U.S. firebombing alone had already destroyed 40% of urban centers and killed 400,000 Japanese.

Shagrath: "The freest of men fly no colors at all"'s profile picture
Shagrath: "The freest of men fly no colors at all"22 days ago

Using complete bullshit about a Japanese land invasion to justify complete bullshit now is fucking vile. Fuck off you ghoul.

Darsco's profile picture
Darsco23 days ago

Around 200K civilians killed how much bloodier do you want?

nama saya Schumacher's profile picture
nama saya Schumacher23 days ago

So the bomber who kills millions are the good man now?

Roy's profile picture
Roy22 days ago

Before 🇺🇸holocausted against 300,000 civilians with the A-bombs dropped on Hiroshima Nagasaki, it attacked densely populated residential areas in Tokyo Osaka Nagoya Kobe Yokohama, holocausted over 1 million civilians with incendiary bombs. Holocaust=Burning alive to death.

Related Videos