正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🔸Video Model Comparison: Image to video 6 Models included: • Pika 2.1 • Adobe Firefly • Runway Gen-3 • Kling 1.6 • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo T2V-01 This time I used an image generated with Magnific's new Fluid model ( Google DeepMind's Imagen + Mystic 2.5 ), and the...

HBCoop_'s profile picture

Heather Cooper

54,722 subscribers

28,375 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术艺术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Salty___Monkey 的头像
Salty___Monkey1 年前

Runway by far

Heather Cooper 的头像
Heather Cooper1 年前

It looks good

Skytech Gaming 的头像
Skytech Gaming2 年前

The @gamdias Neso P1 available now as the Skytech Prism 3 🤝

Pierrick Chevallier | IA 的头像
Pierrick Chevallier | IA1 年前

Excellent post Heather

VΞLΛ ⚡️✍️ 的头像
VΞLΛ ⚡️✍️1 年前

This helped me decide which to use for my next artwork. 😎 🙏 🌊

Heather Cooper 的头像
Heather Cooper1 年前

That's great! I'm so glad it's helpful☺️

Hưng Ai 的头像
Hưng Ai1 年前

Who is a fan of Luma Ray2 and Hailuo, please check in 😁

KingDankKush 的头像
KingDankKush1 年前

Runway and Kling looked the best in my opinion for a completed scene.

Heather Cooper 的头像
Heather Cooper1 年前

Runway was surprisingly good! Kling usually gets it

BaldSasquatch1🇺🇸🇺🇸 的头像
BaldSasquatch1🇺🇸🇺🇸1 年前

These are what I got with your prompt. Thanks for sharing 😎

Heather Cooper 的头像
Heather Cooper1 年前

These are very cool! I'm glad you tried the prompt!

相关视频

Video Model Comparison: Image to video I updated an older comparison with a new image and prompt to test in several models: • Pika 2.2 • PixVerse 4 • Runway Gen-4 • Google Veo 3 • OpenAI Sora • Kling 2.1 Pro • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo I2V I used the same prompt and Midjourney image in each model 2-3 times and chose my favorite results below:
1:12

Video Model Comparison: Image to video I updated an older comparison with a new image and prompt to test in several models: • Pika 2.2 • PixVerse 4 • Runway Gen-4 • Google Veo 3 • OpenAI Sora • Kling 2.1 Pro • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo I2V I used the same prompt and Midjourney image in each model 2-3 times and chose my favorite results below:

Heather Cooper

98,406 次观看 • 1 年前

⚡AI Video Model Comparison: Text to Video 9 Models included: • Google Veo 2 • Adobe Firefly Video • Hunyuan Video • Pika 2.1 Turbo • Genmo Mochi 1 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling 1.6 • Luma Ray2 •.Hailuo T2V-01 Director I used the same prompt on each model x 2 generations and chose my favorite results. Prompt: [Tilt up, Left circling] From the base of an ancient pyramid as storm clouds gather, lightning illuminating hieroglyphics. [Zoom out] Sand swirls in the wind. Epic scale, dramatic lighting. Overall, the results are interesting and dramatic. I don't have a favorite, but you might!
1:11

⚡AI Video Model Comparison: Text to Video 9 Models included: • Google Veo 2 • Adobe Firefly Video • Hunyuan Video • Pika 2.1 Turbo • Genmo Mochi 1 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling 1.6 • Luma Ray2 •.Hailuo T2V-01 Director I used the same prompt on each model x 2 generations and chose my favorite results. Prompt: [Tilt up, Left circling] From the base of an ancient pyramid as storm clouds gather, lightning illuminating hieroglyphics. [Zoom out] Sand swirls in the wind. Epic scale, dramatic lighting. Overall, the results are interesting and dramatic. I don't have a favorite, but you might!

Heather Cooper

80,297 次观看 • 1 年前

🎇 Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Same input image + text prompt on each model: • Pika 2.0 • PixVerse 3.5 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Dream Machine • Hailuo MiniMax I used the same Midjourney image and text prompt in each model and chose my favorite results.
1:00

🎇 Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Same input image + text prompt on each model: • Pika 2.0 • PixVerse 3.5 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Dream Machine • Hailuo MiniMax I used the same Midjourney image and text prompt in each model and chose my favorite results.

Heather Cooper

36,110 次观看 • 1 年前

🎬 Video Model Comparison: Text to video • Google Veo 2 • OpenAI Sora • Hunyuan Video • Pika 2.1 • Alibaba Wanx 2.1 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling 1.6 • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo T2V-01 I used the same prompt on each model for 2 generations and chose the best results below. Prompt: A majestic white tiger prowling silently through a dense jungle, sunlight piercing through the foliage to illuminate its fur; shot with a telephoto lens for depth, using soft natural lighting and creating a mysterious yet tranquil atmosphere. Prompt credit: LudovicCreator Overall, the results are impressive for each one. We have many choices for AI video! I could have tested more models, but this visual is crowded enough. Drop your results in the comments 👇
1:02

🎬 Video Model Comparison: Text to video • Google Veo 2 • OpenAI Sora • Hunyuan Video • Pika 2.1 • Alibaba Wanx 2.1 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling 1.6 • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo T2V-01 I used the same prompt on each model for 2 generations and chose the best results below. Prompt: A majestic white tiger prowling silently through a dense jungle, sunlight piercing through the foliage to illuminate its fur; shot with a telephoto lens for depth, using soft natural lighting and creating a mysterious yet tranquil atmosphere. Prompt credit: LudovicCreator Overall, the results are impressive for each one. We have many choices for AI video! I could have tested more models, but this visual is crowded enough. Drop your results in the comments 👇

Heather Cooper

255,567 次观看 • 1 年前

🌊 Video Model Comparison: Image to Video → Google Veo 3 → Moonvalley Marey → Hailuo MiniMax 02 → Kling 2.1 → Midjourney V1 → Seedance Pro Image: Midjourney I ran the same prompt on each model 2-4 times and chose my favorite results below:
0:50

🌊 Video Model Comparison: Image to Video → Google Veo 3 → Moonvalley Marey → Hailuo MiniMax 02 → Kling 2.1 → Midjourney V1 → Seedance Pro Image: Midjourney I ran the same prompt on each model 2-4 times and chose my favorite results below:

Heather Cooper

67,548 次观看 • 1 年前

✨AI Video Model Comparison: Image to Video • Pika 2.0 • Sora • Gen-3 • Kling 1.6 • Luma • Hailuo Image: Mystic 2.5 on Magnific.ai I used the same prompt on each model for 2-4 generations and picked my favorite results. Take a moment to watch the individual videos following the comparison grid - don't dismiss a result because of the lack of movement, without looking at the details, such as: Consistent color Quality of stone pathway Wind blowing grass & flowers Waves moving realistically below Lighthouse light flickering / moving Full workflow below:
1:01

✨AI Video Model Comparison: Image to Video • Pika 2.0 • Sora • Gen-3 • Kling 1.6 • Luma • Hailuo Image: Mystic 2.5 on Magnific.ai I used the same prompt on each model for 2-4 generations and picked my favorite results. Take a moment to watch the individual videos following the comparison grid - don't dismiss a result because of the lack of movement, without looking at the details, such as: Consistent color Quality of stone pathway Wind blowing grass & flowers Waves moving realistically below Lighthouse light flickering / moving Full workflow below:

Heather Cooper

69,701 次观看 • 1 年前

💄AI Video Model Comparison: Text to Video 10 Models included: • Google Veo2 • Adobe Firefly Video • Hunyuan Video • Pika 2.1 • Wan-2.1 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo MiniMax • Sora (not on grid, but in the full video) I used the same prompt on each model x 4 generations and chose my favorite results below. ⭕ Prompt: A person stands in a bright, airy room, bathed in soft natural light streaming through a large window adorned with sheer white curtains. As they gaze into a shimmering mirror, their hand, elegantly manicured with a deep crimson polish, lifts a glossy lip applicator towards their lips. Their outfit, a flowing pastel blouse paired with chic high-waisted trousers, exudes effortless style, complemented by delicate gold jewelry that sparkles subtly in the light. Applying lipstick, lip gloss, or any makeup seems to be extremely difficult for AI video models. It was hard to get a usable result for many of these. This prompt was generated on Nim with the Video Describe feature, and it worked better than my original prompt. Let me know what you think of the results!
1:10

💄AI Video Model Comparison: Text to Video 10 Models included: • Google Veo2 • Adobe Firefly Video • Hunyuan Video • Pika 2.1 • Wan-2.1 • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Ray2 • Hailuo MiniMax • Sora (not on grid, but in the full video) I used the same prompt on each model x 4 generations and chose my favorite results below. ⭕ Prompt: A person stands in a bright, airy room, bathed in soft natural light streaming through a large window adorned with sheer white curtains. As they gaze into a shimmering mirror, their hand, elegantly manicured with a deep crimson polish, lifts a glossy lip applicator towards their lips. Their outfit, a flowing pastel blouse paired with chic high-waisted trousers, exudes effortless style, complemented by delicate gold jewelry that sparkles subtly in the light. Applying lipstick, lip gloss, or any makeup seems to be extremely difficult for AI video models. It was hard to get a usable result for many of these. This prompt was generated on Nim with the Video Describe feature, and it worked better than my original prompt. Let me know what you think of the results!

Heather Cooper

61,177 次观看 • 1 年前

🎇 Video Model Comparison: Text to Video → Veo 3 → Kling 2.1 Master → Hailuo 02 → Runway Gen-4 → Seedance 1 Pro → Pika 2.2 I compared the same prompt on each model x 2-4 generations and chose my favorites below: First-person perspective, 24mm lens simulation with motion blur and subtle head bob, bursting through a smashed window of a burning high-rise in hyperspeed as AI drones scan the area below; glass shards glint mid-air in bullet-time slow motion, sparks and rebar catching fire; wind howls past the camera with debris streaking across frame; gritty and kinetic, immersive audio and POV-style distortion, cinematic style. If you try it on a different video model, share your result below 👇
0:42

🎇 Video Model Comparison: Text to Video → Veo 3 → Kling 2.1 Master → Hailuo 02 → Runway Gen-4 → Seedance 1 Pro → Pika 2.2 I compared the same prompt on each model x 2-4 generations and chose my favorites below: First-person perspective, 24mm lens simulation with motion blur and subtle head bob, bursting through a smashed window of a burning high-rise in hyperspeed as AI drones scan the area below; glass shards glint mid-air in bullet-time slow motion, sparks and rebar catching fire; wind howls past the camera with debris streaking across frame; gritty and kinetic, immersive audio and POV-style distortion, cinematic style. If you try it on a different video model, share your result below 👇

Heather Cooper

64,523 次观看 • 1 年前

⚔️Video Model Comparison: Img2Vid I tested the same prompt on several models, but I was only able to get decent results from these: • Veo 2 • Ray2 • Kling 1.6 • Hailuo 01-Live Prompt: As the fierce warrior turns to rally his troops, sunlight gleams off his chiseled arms. In the foreground, he stands resolute, a harbinger of strength, while a dolly zoom reveals his warriors behind, poised with spears. Dust swirls around them under a vivid blue sky, capturing the impending surge of battle. Of course, I would tweak the prompt several times to get the motion I need, but I like to test multiple models to understand how they interpret prompts and images and the quality of the results. Image: Midjourney
0:47

⚔️Video Model Comparison: Img2Vid I tested the same prompt on several models, but I was only able to get decent results from these: • Veo 2 • Ray2 • Kling 1.6 • Hailuo 01-Live Prompt: As the fierce warrior turns to rally his troops, sunlight gleams off his chiseled arms. In the foreground, he stands resolute, a harbinger of strength, while a dolly zoom reveals his warriors behind, poised with spears. Dust swirls around them under a vivid blue sky, capturing the impending surge of battle. Of course, I would tweak the prompt several times to get the motion I need, but I like to test multiple models to understand how they interpret prompts and images and the quality of the results. Image: Midjourney

Heather Cooper

34,407 次观看 • 1 年前

Video Model Comparison: Text to Video → Veo 3.1 → Sora 2 Pro → Kling 2.6 → Luma Ray3 → Wan 2.5 → Hailuo 2.3 → LTX-2 Pro → Seedance Pro Many of the new models automatically generate sound with video results including Veo 3.1, Sora 2 Pro, Kling 2.6, Wan 2.5, and LTX-2 Pro. I used Mirelo AI SFX and ElevenLabs to add sound to the others. I used the same prompt on each model 4x and chose the best result: Meteor Shower Panic Subject: [Father holding daughter's hand, looking up] Action: [Running through a suburban street, looking up as meteors streak across the sky, a small impact occurs nearby blowing wind and dust at them] Scene: [Suburban street, night, streetlights, burning trails in sky] Style: [Cinematic disaster, low angle tracking shot, high contrast, lens flares from meteors] Audio: Audio: sonic booms, wind rushing, car alarms triggered, shouting. Technical: [daytime, calm, sunny, happy] Which one is your favorite?
1:33

Video Model Comparison: Text to Video → Veo 3.1 → Sora 2 Pro → Kling 2.6 → Luma Ray3 → Wan 2.5 → Hailuo 2.3 → LTX-2 Pro → Seedance Pro Many of the new models automatically generate sound with video results including Veo 3.1, Sora 2 Pro, Kling 2.6, Wan 2.5, and LTX-2 Pro. I used Mirelo AI SFX and ElevenLabs to add sound to the others. I used the same prompt on each model 4x and chose the best result: Meteor Shower Panic Subject: [Father holding daughter's hand, looking up] Action: [Running through a suburban street, looking up as meteors streak across the sky, a small impact occurs nearby blowing wind and dust at them] Scene: [Suburban street, night, streetlights, burning trails in sky] Style: [Cinematic disaster, low angle tracking shot, high contrast, lens flares from meteors] Audio: Audio: sonic booms, wind rushing, car alarms triggered, shouting. Technical: [daytime, calm, sunny, happy] Which one is your favorite?

Heather Cooper

20,422 次观看 • 8 个月前

Here's a look behind the scenes of how I used a 3d model, generated from an image, as a "driver" for ai animation. In the near future we'll see more 3d tools that support these types of workflows, with much more emphasis on enhancing user input instead of just letting the ai do everything. I used the 3d model to generate keyframes that I then animated in Luma Dream. By using a 3d model with a diffusion "layer" done with Krea, I got quite high quality frames with a relatively high consistency as well since the AI didn't have to "hallucinate" that much. I upscaled and detailed the frames using Magnific. Using semi-detailed 3d models as drivers for gen ai is very powerful, and it allows us to use models that are sculpted in a more free-flowing type of workflow that doesn't rely so much on high surface detailing or very time-consuming finish, but instead relies more on gestural 3d sculpting. #art #ai
0:24

Here's a look behind the scenes of how I used a 3d model, generated from an image, as a "driver" for ai animation. In the near future we'll see more 3d tools that support these types of workflows, with much more emphasis on enhancing user input instead of just letting the ai do everything. I used the 3d model to generate keyframes that I then animated in Luma Dream. By using a 3d model with a diffusion "layer" done with Krea, I got quite high quality frames with a relatively high consistency as well since the AI didn't have to "hallucinate" that much. I upscaled and detailed the frames using Magnific. Using semi-detailed 3d models as drivers for gen ai is very powerful, and it allows us to use models that are sculpted in a more free-flowing type of workflow that doesn't rely so much on high surface detailing or very time-consuming finish, but instead relies more on gestural 3d sculpting. #art #ai

Martin Nebelong

48,280 次观看 • 2 年前

🧵1/3 I partnered with Kling to make a promo for their new 3.0 model. I came up with the concept, created it and delivered it all on my own in 3 days of early access, I wanted to make something that showed how Kling could be used to tell a diverse range of stories in a diverse range of styles. I've honestly been blown away be how incredible the model is and I haven't even scratched the surface of features like the new 3.0 OMNI model. For me Kling 2.6 was already best in class for most things but 3.0 sees massive improvements to video quality and detail (no need to add grain to mask imperfections) and prompt adherence. Also you can time your generations to be as long as 15 seconds and as short as 3, this is fantastic for pacing your scenes. Read on to find out more about the new Performance and Multi shot features!👇
1:26

🧵1/3 I partnered with Kling to make a promo for their new 3.0 model. I came up with the concept, created it and delivered it all on my own in 3 days of early access, I wanted to make something that showed how Kling could be used to tell a diverse range of stories in a diverse range of styles. I've honestly been blown away be how incredible the model is and I haven't even scratched the surface of features like the new 3.0 OMNI model. For me Kling 2.6 was already best in class for most things but 3.0 sees massive improvements to video quality and detail (no need to add grain to mask imperfections) and prompt adherence. Also you can time your generations to be as long as 15 seconds and as short as 3, this is fantastic for pacing your scenes. Read on to find out more about the new Performance and Multi shot features!👇

Uncanny Harry AI

29,194 次观看 • 6 个月前

I trained Adobe Firefly on my images and it changed how I work. Custom Models learns your visual style. Your light, your tones, your grain. Not from a reference image, not from a prompt but from your actual work. The result? Consistent, on-brand outputs that feel like yours. Every time. Here's how it works 👇 🔹 Upload 10–30 of your images 🔹 Firefly analyzes and trains your model 🔹 Generate new work that stays true to your style And it's not just photography. Custom Models works across creative disciplines: 🎨 Illustration to maintain stroke weight, color palette, and shape consistency across icons and graphics ✏️ Character design to recreate your illustrated character across poses, expressions, and scenes without redrawing from scratch 📷 Photography to expand a photo set with matching light, color grade, and composition No complex workflows. No technical expertise. Just your creative vision, at scale. If you've ever spent hours trying to maintain visual consistency across a project, this is the solution. Adobe Firefly Custom Models: your style, your model, your work. Faster. This post is sponsored by Adobe through a paid partnership as an Adobe Firefly Ambassador. #AdobeFireflyAmbassadors #Ad #FireflyCustomModels
3:24

I trained Adobe Firefly on my images and it changed how I work. Custom Models learns your visual style. Your light, your tones, your grain. Not from a reference image, not from a prompt but from your actual work. The result? Consistent, on-brand outputs that feel like yours. Every time. Here's how it works 👇 🔹 Upload 10–30 of your images 🔹 Firefly analyzes and trains your model 🔹 Generate new work that stays true to your style And it's not just photography. Custom Models works across creative disciplines: 🎨 Illustration to maintain stroke weight, color palette, and shape consistency across icons and graphics ✏️ Character design to recreate your illustrated character across poses, expressions, and scenes without redrawing from scratch 📷 Photography to expand a photo set with matching light, color grade, and composition No complex workflows. No technical expertise. Just your creative vision, at scale. If you've ever spent hours trying to maintain visual consistency across a project, this is the solution. Adobe Firefly Custom Models: your style, your model, your work. Faster. This post is sponsored by Adobe through a paid partnership as an Adobe Firefly Ambassador. #AdobeFireflyAmbassadors #Ad #FireflyCustomModels

Alexandra Aisling

13,359 次观看 • 5 个月前

Google I/O. Some thoughts: the model seems to be multimodal in, but not multimodal out. Imagen-3 and music gen models are still detached from Gemini as standalone components. Merging all modality I/O natively is the inevitable future: - enables tasks like "use a more robotic voice", "speak 2x faster", "edit this image iteratively", and "generate consistent comic strips". - does not lose information across modal boundaries, e.g. emotion and background sound. - opens up new in-context capabilities. You can teach the model to combine different senses in novel ways with few-shot examples. GPT-4o doesn't do it perfectly, but it gets the form factor correct. In words of Andrej's LLM-as-OS analogy: we need the model to natively support as many file extensions as possible. One thing Google is doing right: they are finally making serious efforts to integrate AI into the search box. I sense the agent flow: planning, real-time browsing, and multimodal input, all from the landing page. Google's strongest moat is distribution. Gemini doesn't have to be the best model to be the most used one in the world.
2:16

Google I/O. Some thoughts: the model seems to be multimodal in, but not multimodal out. Imagen-3 and music gen models are still detached from Gemini as standalone components. Merging all modality I/O natively is the inevitable future: - enables tasks like "use a more robotic voice", "speak 2x faster", "edit this image iteratively", and "generate consistent comic strips". - does not lose information across modal boundaries, e.g. emotion and background sound. - opens up new in-context capabilities. You can teach the model to combine different senses in novel ways with few-shot examples. GPT-4o doesn't do it perfectly, but it gets the form factor correct. In words of Andrej's LLM-as-OS analogy: we need the model to natively support as many file extensions as possible. One thing Google is doing right: they are finally making serious efforts to integrate AI into the search box. I sense the agent flow: planning, real-time browsing, and multimodal input, all from the landing page. Google's strongest moat is distribution. Gemini doesn't have to be the best model to be the most used one in the world.

Jim Fan

209,643 次观看 • 2 年前

i probably shouldn't be giving this away but f*ck it i built an agent that turns your ad script into model-specific prompts for AI video generation, based on skills for each model i use day-to-day here's how it works: > pick your mode - first frame or full video generation > pick your model - gpt-image-2, omni, kling, seedance 2.0 or 2.5 > paste your script - it splits it into scenes > get a prompt per scene, tuned for the exact model you picked most people think the model is what makes the ad... and it's true, but the prompt is what gets you a good generation on the first try instead of wasting money on rerolls - seedance wants timestamps. - omni wants references tagged. - gpt-image wants art direction and reference feed them all the same generic prompt and they all hand you slop these skills took me months of daily reps to get right, now i'm sharing it with you RT + reply "SCENES" and i'll send you the full thing so you can run in on your PC (must follow so i can dm)
0:31

i probably shouldn't be giving this away but f*ck it i built an agent that turns your ad script into model-specific prompts for AI video generation, based on skills for each model i use day-to-day here's how it works: > pick your mode - first frame or full video generation > pick your model - gpt-image-2, omni, kling, seedance 2.0 or 2.5 > paste your script - it splits it into scenes > get a prompt per scene, tuned for the exact model you picked most people think the model is what makes the ad... and it's true, but the prompt is what gets you a good generation on the first try instead of wasting money on rerolls - seedance wants timestamps. - omni wants references tagged. - gpt-image wants art direction and reference feed them all the same generic prompt and they all hand you slop these skills took me months of daily reps to get right, now i'm sharing it with you RT + reply "SCENES" and i'll send you the full thing so you can run in on your PC (must follow so i can dm)

MAX

17,004 次观看 • 18 天前

Seedance 2.0 is allowing us to enter a new era of music video creation. Here is how I created HONEY. It was a quick test to see how well this workflow holds up. 🐝 1 - Write your song and generate the music with Suno 5.5. 2 - Use an image generator of your choice. For HONEY I combined both Grok Imagine for aesthetics and Nano Banana Pro for refined editing. 3 - In Capcut I import my audio and just save out a blank video video containing the audio. This step is important because this video file containing audio will now be used with Seedance 2.0 as a video reference with Omni. This allows the AI to apply automatic and realistic lipsync and movement to the music, it's extremely powerful! 4 - Once I have a both my image and video with audio as reference, I use Seedance 2.0 Omni and upload my starting image and then the video reference with the audio. 5 - From here I'm simply prompting like normal, specifying what's happening in my scene with detailed instructions, mentioning multi shots and camera angle changes and then specifying that the person is singing along to the song. I type out the lyrics that are present to have better lipsync accuracy. 6 - Once I have generated a video and like the result, I do video to video, so i upload that video that just got generated and type "The scene continues" and prompt new actions to take place. This allows you to expand on a narrative. These new shots can be used as B-ROLL and since I uploaded my video as reference I have full consistency of everything it saw in the video. This is also extremely powerful. 7 - This is actually the most difficult part. Edit in Capcut. This is where you need to understand pacing and shot selection from all the scenes you generated to bring it all together. You must be strategic with the editing. Goodluck! I'll probably record a video tutorial at some point as it's easier to see what is being done.
0:46

Seedance 2.0 is allowing us to enter a new era of music video creation. Here is how I created HONEY. It was a quick test to see how well this workflow holds up. 🐝 1 - Write your song and generate the music with Suno 5.5. 2 - Use an image generator of your choice. For HONEY I combined both Grok Imagine for aesthetics and Nano Banana Pro for refined editing. 3 - In Capcut I import my audio and just save out a blank video video containing the audio. This step is important because this video file containing audio will now be used with Seedance 2.0 as a video reference with Omni. This allows the AI to apply automatic and realistic lipsync and movement to the music, it's extremely powerful! 4 - Once I have a both my image and video with audio as reference, I use Seedance 2.0 Omni and upload my starting image and then the video reference with the audio. 5 - From here I'm simply prompting like normal, specifying what's happening in my scene with detailed instructions, mentioning multi shots and camera angle changes and then specifying that the person is singing along to the song. I type out the lyrics that are present to have better lipsync accuracy. 6 - Once I have generated a video and like the result, I do video to video, so i upload that video that just got generated and type "The scene continues" and prompt new actions to take place. This allows you to expand on a narrative. These new shots can be used as B-ROLL and since I uploaded my video as reference I have full consistency of everything it saw in the video. This is also extremely powerful. 7 - This is actually the most difficult part. Edit in Capcut. This is where you need to understand pacing and shot selection from all the scenes you generated to bring it all together. You must be strategic with the editing. Goodluck! I'll probably record a video tutorial at some point as it's easier to see what is being done.

Travis Davids

19,236 次观看 • 4 个月前

Mini tutorial for Google DeepMind 's VEO 2 Prompt Buddy. (Works well with other AI video tools as well). I’ve created my VEO 2 Prompt Buddy Custom GPT to help me go beyond my own brain and prompts. It can describe your images, enhance your prompts, be creative and more. It will provide you 4 different sections to choose from. I’ve also added a camera combinations section inspired by the Hailuo I2V-01-Director model for testing purposes. It’s currently in BETA mode in my GPT because, sometimes, multiple camera movements don’t work optimally in VEO 2 right now. Output sections: 1. PRO – Provides detailed, professional, and cinematically accurate results. 2. OUT OF THE BOX – Creates something more creative and unexpected from your idea. 3. ULTRA DETAILED – Expands your idea with extreme precision and even more detail. 4. CAMERA COMBINATIONS – Generates a version with cinematic camera transitions. This hot sauce is FREE for a limited time! Hope you have fun with this one. Link down below: --- All results are text-to-video
1:21

Mini tutorial for Google DeepMind 's VEO 2 Prompt Buddy. (Works well with other AI video tools as well). I’ve created my VEO 2 Prompt Buddy Custom GPT to help me go beyond my own brain and prompts. It can describe your images, enhance your prompts, be creative and more. It will provide you 4 different sections to choose from. I’ve also added a camera combinations section inspired by the Hailuo I2V-01-Director model for testing purposes. It’s currently in BETA mode in my GPT because, sometimes, multiple camera movements don’t work optimally in VEO 2 right now. Output sections: 1. PRO – Provides detailed, professional, and cinematically accurate results. 2. OUT OF THE BOX – Creates something more creative and unexpected from your idea. 3. ULTRA DETAILED – Expands your idea with extreme precision and even more detail. 4. CAMERA COMBINATIONS – Generates a version with cinematic camera transitions. This hot sauce is FREE for a limited time! Hope you have fun with this one. Link down below: --- All results are text-to-video

Allar Haltsonen

58,509 次观看 • 1 年前

Let's go! I'm excited to present my entry for the Grok Imagine Creator contest for the Super Bowl! This was made 100% exclusively with Imagine via grok on web, I edited it in a simple editing program and then added my own music. Imagine is an incredibly powerful image and video model, not to mention it's phenomenally fast to generate. I used Imagine's powerful image capabilities to create brand mockups for these insert shots, and was able to get some really incredible shots of the football players in action as well that I leveraged heavily. Key prompt terms were: anamorphic lensing, volumetric lighting, lens distortion, and chromatic aberration for those of you curious! This is the future! xAI has cooked so intensely and I'm so thankful to be here with all of you as well to them for putting on such a great contest. Truly appreciated! Comment below with "grok is this true" and I'll split the prize money with the first 50 of you to do so, should I be so lucky, haha. I know so many of you are not in the states so please link your work below too if you do comment as well!
0:30

Let's go! I'm excited to present my entry for the Grok Imagine Creator contest for the Super Bowl! This was made 100% exclusively with Imagine via grok on web, I edited it in a simple editing program and then added my own music. Imagine is an incredibly powerful image and video model, not to mention it's phenomenally fast to generate. I used Imagine's powerful image capabilities to create brand mockups for these insert shots, and was able to get some really incredible shots of the football players in action as well that I leveraged heavily. Key prompt terms were: anamorphic lensing, volumetric lighting, lens distortion, and chromatic aberration for those of you curious! This is the future! xAI has cooked so intensely and I'm so thankful to be here with all of you as well to them for putting on such a great contest. Truly appreciated! Comment below with "grok is this true" and I'll split the prize money with the first 50 of you to do so, should I be so lucky, haha. I know so many of you are not in the states so please link your work below too if you do comment as well!

Kiri

18,713 次观看 • 6 个月前

Okay, this one is the Grok Imagine version. But here’s something you need to note: I uploaded the character sheet I made with Nano Banana Pro as the base image. So it feels like this fake “Omni reference” kind of style, but it works 😄 Somehow, it’s much more consistent than uploading a still image of your scene with your character, because there’s a chance your character will morph a bit. By using your character sheet as the base model, it helps maintain consistency. The only problem is that when you do the img2vid prompt, you need to retell the setting, the action, the vibe and so on. But for me, I kind of like that approach, LOL 😆 Like I said, I’m getting lazy about animating images one by one. With this approach, I can just focus on dividing the shots, like shot 1: blabla, shot 2: bliblibli, shot 3: blublu, etc. Now for the comparison: In comparison with the Kling 3.0 Omni version, I feel that Grok Imagine is much more dynamic. But in terms of the character performance, it feels a bit over the top. It’s like the AI characters are acting it out 😁 Meanwhile, Kling 3.0 Omni feels much more realistic in terms of the acting and a bit more atmospheric. I honestly love both. If I want to fool around, I guess I’ll use Grok Imagine. But if I want more subtle realism and a candid feel, I’ll go with Kling 3.0.
0:51

Okay, this one is the Grok Imagine version. But here’s something you need to note: I uploaded the character sheet I made with Nano Banana Pro as the base image. So it feels like this fake “Omni reference” kind of style, but it works 😄 Somehow, it’s much more consistent than uploading a still image of your scene with your character, because there’s a chance your character will morph a bit. By using your character sheet as the base model, it helps maintain consistency. The only problem is that when you do the img2vid prompt, you need to retell the setting, the action, the vibe and so on. But for me, I kind of like that approach, LOL 😆 Like I said, I’m getting lazy about animating images one by one. With this approach, I can just focus on dividing the shots, like shot 1: blabla, shot 2: bliblibli, shot 3: blublu, etc. Now for the comparison: In comparison with the Kling 3.0 Omni version, I feel that Grok Imagine is much more dynamic. But in terms of the character performance, it feels a bit over the top. It’s like the AI characters are acting it out 😁 Meanwhile, Kling 3.0 Omni feels much more realistic in terms of the acting and a bit more atmospheric. I honestly love both. If I want to fool around, I guess I’ll use Grok Imagine. But if I want more subtle realism and a candid feel, I’ll go with Kling 3.0.

MXVDXN // DAN

16,961 次观看 • 6 个月前