Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Vijay Kedia Sir explains entry & exit strategy using Vibhishan’s lesson from #Ramayan He exited Ravana & entered Rama at the right time. Same rule applies in #StockMarkets. #EntryExit 🩷 & 🔂to share learnings with all ... #Trading #Investing #StockMarketIndia

10,969 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

As crazy as it may sound, what if the Modi–Amit Shah duo used Joseph Vijay as a stone to kill two birds (the Dravidian parties) at the same time? You may think I am crazy, and you may hurl abuses through quotes and comments, but I don’t care. I am just sharing my perspective with reasoning. Please analyze every question of mine logically and with an analytical bent of mind! Did you notice that, after Vijay went to Delhi for the CBI interrogation, he was more confident than ever? Did you notice the whistle symbol being given to Vijay, which every layman can relate to? Did you know Vijay’s poll candidates were from diverse backgrounds representing all walks of society, and even until February 2026, his 234-candidate list was not finalized? How did everything happen after his visit to Delhi? Did you notice that all party movements, like candidate selection based on social engineering, happened silently? Who else is more experienced in social engineering than the BJP? Did you notice that Vijay never targeted the BJP in 2026? Did you know that leading IT companies in Chennai held town halls and decided, as organizations, to vote for Vijay? Did these companies receive instructions from Delhi? Did you know Vijay never stepped into Hindu temples before, even during campaigns? It happened only right before the election results. Can it be seen as a collaboration between Vijay and the BJP? Did you know ADMK and many second-rung BJP leaders wanted an alliance with Vijay, but PM Modi and Amit Shah were particular that Vijay contest alone? Why? Do you know market expansion strategy? If you don’t have the time, resources, and credible manpower, you outsource the task. Could Vijay be Delhi’s face in TN? TVK Vijay You may ask me, “but how did Vijay accept Congress’s support”? Didn’t he break the Congress–DMK alliance that PM Modi has long wanted to disrupt? Ask yourself, why should Vijay empower EPS and his declining ADMK, which came third in this election? If Vijay accepts support from one of the ADMK factions, it will further weaken ADMK and the faction will merge with TVK. ADMK will be demolish for good. If DMK and ADMK join hands to take on TVK, as rumoured, Vijay may join hands with the BJP to take on both Dravidian parties, and it will be a fight to the finish. Now ask this question to yourself - Didn’t Vijay weaken both the DMK and ADMK? TN is heavily influenced by Dravidianism. The only weapon against it is cinema popularity. Check out this speech from Vijay. He sounds so confident even before polling that he is going to sweep the polls. Why was he so confident? Whose backing did he have? What if the Modi–Amit Shah duo used someone with immense cinema popularity, Vijay as a stone to kill both Dravidian parties at the same time? Only a diamond can cut another diamond! Some battles are won differently — NEVER EVER underestimate PM Modi and HM Amit Shah! Narendra Modi Amit Shah

Praveen

99,751 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A 22-year-old woman, an IIT graduate and the daughter of a senior bureaucrat, was found dead at her home in southeast Delhi's East of Kailash area. Police said she was raped before being strangled to death with a phone charger. She was alone at home at the time of the incident. There were no signs of forced entry. Police have arrested a 19-year-old domestic help, Rahul, who had worked at the house and was dismissed over a month ago. "Investigations revealed that he used to play online games and would borrow money from other servants in the vicinity, or from domestic staff working in nearby households, without ever repaying them. This is why he was fired," Joint Commissioner of Police Vijay Kumar said. He was arrested from a hotel in the Dwarka area, where he had been hiding. He is being charged with rape, murder and robbery, police said. Rahul was seen in CCTV footage leaving the victim's residence at 6:28 am, police said. According to police, the woman was found by her family members inside the house under suspicious circumstances, after which the authorities were alerted. The victim had completed her schooling at DPS RK Puram and later graduated from IIT Delhi. She was preparing for the UPSC examination. She was also a dancer and had won several awards in dance competitions. Her elder brother holds a senior position in a multinational company, and her mother is a doctor. When police reached Rahul's residence in Alwar, they found that he had previously been involved in a sexual harassment case. Police said the accused arrived in Delhi from Alwar the previous night and is suspected to have entered the house using a spare key. Police said Rahul had been hired with a reference from a superintendent posted at the IRS officer's office.

Hate Detector 🔍

314,734 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Payout denied by FunderPro sharing my experience Owen Morton FunderPro MyForexFirms Prop Firm Match Prop Firm Eye I had a $100K 2-Step Classic account with FunderPro. I requested my 2nd payout of $952 on 6 Dec 2025. After 5+ days with no update, I contacted Discord support. They said the payout team was informed and they would check. On 12 Dec, I received an email stating: My payout was rejected My account was closed Reason: “Suspicious trading activity & inconsistent with terms” I am attaching a video of my dashboard which i recorded before requesting the payout There you will se one failed acc I have never failed any master acc , They had a server migration so they closed that acc and gave me new acc with same bal So you ll find trades in 2 acc My dashboard access was deleted, I was removed from Discord, and I’ve been unable to log in since. At the time of trading, only 2 rules existed: 20% margin rule News trading rule I never violated either. My trading details: Risked 1–1.2% per trade One trade per day One pair only Same strategy throughout I have screen recordings of all trades I emailed support asking for clarification and access. They gave me a ticket ID, then went silent for 5–6 days. Later, they said they don’t have access to my ticket ID. They asked me to create a ticket via the dashboard — I explained I cannot log in. They said it might be a glitch and asked me to reset my password. I tried. No success. I contacted a FunderPro affiliate. He said he’d look into it , asked me to create another ticket , after some days there was no response from him or FunderPro. In January, I emailed again. I received the same generic reply: > “Suspicious and inconsistent trading behaviour” I asked them to clearly explain: Which rule I violated Which trade was inconsistent How my trading breached their terms I still haven’t received a clear explanation. I’m posting this for transparency. If my trading was inconsistent, I’m open to facts — but I deserve a specific, rule-based explanation. I request Owen Morton FunderPro To look into this and honour my Payout

TRADERMONK

14,953 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

UgandaVsMollyKatanga Senior Forensic Pathologist calls the possibility that Mr Henry Katanga was shot and killed by his wife Molly Katanga, “extremely slim and highly unlikely”. He said the case before Justice Rosette Comfort Kania is not a homicide but a homicide-suicide where Mr Henry Katanga beat his wife, thought she was dead then sat or stood on the bed and shot himself. He lambasted the postmortem report presented by the state to back up their case as a “very dangerous postmortem report that couldn’t have passed peer review” in a serious entity. Dr Sylvester Onzivua was the first defense witness in this trial. He holds a Degree in Medicine and Surgery, from Makerere University (1993), a Masters of Medicine in Pathology (2003), a Post Graduate Diploma in Forensic medicine from the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa (2005). He’s also trained in Forensic Anthropology from Durban. He worked with Mulago Hospital, attached to the Department of Pathology of Makerere University and part of his deployment was in the City Mortuary where he was the Head of City Mortuary. He worked there from 2005 up to 2013. He said he has testified in numerous cases, mostly for the prosecution, including in the military courts. In a session whose start was marked by early heated exchanges between defense attorney Elison Karuhanga and Chief State Attorney Jonathan Muwaganya, Dr Onzivua took on the mantle of courtroom forensic pathology Prof, basically reliving a teaching role he continues to play in real life at Makerere University, even after his retirement. Early court proceedings were anything but smooth, with the Judge calling both sets of lawyers to her chambers for more than 2 hours because the state was adamant that Dr Onzivua shouldn’t use the postmortem report on court file but should instead use copies availed to him by the defense. On resumption and with a 50 slide PowerPoint presentation, Dr Onzivua took Justice Kania through the science of bullets and bullet injuries. He told her how to tell a bullet entry wound from an exit wound. He then used images of the late Henry Katanga, taken during postmortem, to show that the pathologists who conducted that postmortem wrote an erroneous report that misled the court to think the bullet that killed Mr Katanga went from left to right as opposed to what he said was a scientifically incontrovertible conclusion that the bullet direction was right to left. This point is very key because when Justice Kania put Mrs Katanga to her defense, she relied in part on prosecution evidence that claimed that Mr Katanga was shot on the left side of his head and since he was right handed, this would be very difficult. Dr Onzivua scoffed at that and using a combination of human props and postmortem images, he showed that indeed the state had it wrong; that it was scientifically wrong to conclude as they did. He pointed to the absence of tattooing, lacerations on the hole on the left side of Mr Katanga’s head and wondered why the state pathologists concluded that it was an entry hole despite showing all characteristics of an exit hole. He said there’s “no tattooing, no blackening, no muzzle imprint on a close contact bullet entry wound? So how, how, hoooow would they have called this an entry wound in the absence of blackening, tattooing or muzzle imprint? There’s no scientific basis of calling the wound on the left an entry wound.” “The wound on the right was stated to be 5cm by 3cm and this was described as an exit wound. The entire dimensions of the ear were taken and then stated to be the dimensions of the exit wound. This, scientifically is not correct. The true dimensions of the skull defect on the right side were not taken and there is therefore no scientific basis to call it an exit wound. A comparison of the right and left ear shows blackening on the right and none on the left. On the contrary, the external features of the wound on the right side are those of an entry hole” Cont’d…

Anthony Natif

40,323 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Persi Diaconis walked into a lecture at the University of Washington, held up a coin, and told a room of physicists that Richard Feynman was fooled by it his entire life. He was right. In 2007, Diaconis proved a coin flip is not 50/50. It lands on the side it started on about 51 percent of the time. The bias comes from the physics of rotation under gravity. Every physicist since Newton had assumed 50/50 without ever testing it. Every trading model built on that assumption is running on the same lie. The lecture was on Feynman's book "The Meaning of it All." Diaconis quoted the most famous line in it: "the first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool." Then he pointed out that Feynman himself was fooled by every coin he ever flipped. Feynman's own rule would have killed the 50/50 assumption on day one. The market is the same setup at scale. Every model that assumes independent 50/50 outcomes at the base layer is built on a physical impossibility. Order flow, positioning, forced flows, expiries all leave biases larger than 1 percent. Your gut cannot see them. The math already knows they are there. Diaconis's rule: before you trust a random process, check it. Actually check it. Not with a simulation. With a proof or an experiment. The coin is where you start. The chart is where the same rule pays. The only random thing about markets is how thoroughly you refuse to check them.

veles

18,798 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I'm sure most of us have, at least once in our lives, woken up terrified from a dream where we missed an exam because we were late. We all know that sinking feeling in the pit of the stomach, the panic, helplessness, and regret. That's why this video is so painful to watch. These students missed their NEET after getting stuck in a political rally in Bengaluru. Many would argue that since it wasn't their fault, they should have been allowed to enter. After all, they wouldn't have gained any advantage, they would simply have had less time to write the exam. I understand that sentiment. It comes from a place of empathy, and that's a good thing. But large public exams cannot be run purely on emotions. They require clear, objective, and uniformly enforced rules. The purpose of a reporting-time cutoff isn't to punish late candidates; it's to ensure that every candidate is treated according to the same standard. Once exceptions begin, the rule itself loses meaning. Why allow someone 5 minutes late but not 15? Why make an exception for one reason and not another? Imagine the chaos at thousands of exam centre if you leave entry time to discretion! In exams involving lakhs of candidates, fairness lies not in evaluating individual circumstances but in applying the same rule to everyone without discretion. To add, centers are designed to complete security checks, identity verification, seating, and other protocols before the process begins; late admissions create operational and security complications and undermine confidence in the integrity of the exam. It's heartbreaking for the students. One can sympathize with them and still accept that the authorities were right to enforce the cutoff. Sometimes a decision can be both unfortunate and correct at the same time.

THE SKIN DOCTOR

195,598 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад