Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Vincent van Gogh accidentally solved a complex physics problem while inside an asylum. In 2004, scientists analyzed The Starry Night, they found something magical. His swirling brushstrokes perfectly match Kolmogorov’s formula for fluid turbulence. This formula describes how energy flows through the universe. Physicists of his time could not... show more

Kekius Maximus

128,929 subscribers

375,159 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Arts Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🎶✨Vincent - Don McLean (1971) Starry, starry night… Don McLean’s tribute to Vincent van Gogh paints his life, his suffering, and his misunderstood brilliance through the lens of The Starry Night — a swirling sky born from observation, memory, and emotion during his time in the asylum.

🎶✨Vincent - Don McLean (1971) Starry, starry night… Don McLean’s tribute to Vincent van Gogh paints his life, his suffering, and his misunderstood brilliance through the lens of The Starry Night — a swirling sky born from observation, memory, and emotion during his time in the asylum.

𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗰 ✨🎵

30,385 views • 7 months ago

Nobody quite did media like Phil Taylor. This was Taylor after thrashing Michael van Gerwen in the quarter-final of his last ever World Matchplay before lifting it for the 16th time - Taylor was 4/1 to win this match. “He didn’t text Vincent van der Voort tonight did he? “It’s ridiculous. During Simon Whitlock’s match he’s 8-2 up and texts Vindent vance der Voort, ‘Simon Whitlock’s out’. “What’s he doing? He’s a professional, he’s World No.1, he’s World Champion. Grow up. “I’m not angry at him I think he’s just stupid for doing that. I’ll be honest with you, I’m going to tell him anyway.”

Nobody quite did media like Phil Taylor. This was Taylor after thrashing Michael van Gerwen in the quarter-final of his last ever World Matchplay before lifting it for the 16th time - Taylor was 4/1 to win this match. “He didn’t text Vincent van der Voort tonight did he? “It’s ridiculous. During Simon Whitlock’s match he’s 8-2 up and texts Vindent vance der Voort, ‘Simon Whitlock’s out’. “What’s he doing? He’s a professional, he’s World No.1, he’s World Champion. Grow up. “I’m not angry at him I think he’s just stupid for doing that. I’ll be honest with you, I’m going to tell him anyway.”

Connor Cain

486,987 views • 5 months ago

🇨🇦 SCIENTISTS SETTLE IT: THE UNIVERSE DEFINITELY ISN'T THE MATRIX Canadian researchers just definitively answered whether we're living in a computer simulation: we're not, and it's mathematically impossible. UBC professor Dr. Mir Faizal and his team proved that reality operates on "non-algorithmic understanding" that no computer could ever simulate. They used Gödel's incompleteness theorem to show some truths can only be grasped through understanding that doesn't follow logical steps. Computers follow recipes. Reality doesn't. The fundamental laws of physics exist beyond space and time in what physicists call a Platonic realm of pure information that can't be coded. They basically say the universe is too weird to be fake. Then again, wouldn't a really good simulation include scientists proving it's not a simulation? Source: UBC Okanagan

🇨🇦 SCIENTISTS SETTLE IT: THE UNIVERSE DEFINITELY ISN'T THE MATRIX Canadian researchers just definitively answered whether we're living in a computer simulation: we're not, and it's mathematically impossible. UBC professor Dr. Mir Faizal and his team proved that reality operates on "non-algorithmic understanding" that no computer could ever simulate. They used Gödel's incompleteness theorem to show some truths can only be grasped through understanding that doesn't follow logical steps. Computers follow recipes. Reality doesn't. The fundamental laws of physics exist beyond space and time in what physicists call a Platonic realm of pure information that can't be coded. They basically say the universe is too weird to be fake. Then again, wouldn't a really good simulation include scientists proving it's not a simulation? Source: UBC Okanagan

Mario Nawfal

76,024 views • 10 months ago

SHOCKING ⚡️ In 1960s, this man discovered the "God formula" that proved: • Past is "changeable" • Future is NOW • Reality is projection Then CIA seized it all. But a declassified document from 2003 reveals why they're terrified. His name was Itzhak Bentov. You may have never heard of him. But his research reshaped how NASA, the CIA, and quantum physicists understand the mind. Bentov said the universe was not “out there” It was *inside you* He called it the “holographic model of consciousness” You are not a *body* living in the universe You are the *universe* living through a body Watch this video carefully to understand it. In 1977, the CIA secretly studied his model. The document? “The Gateway Experience” It was classified for decades and described a shocking method to transcend time and space Page 25 was blacked out for years Why? Because Page 25 revealed this: > "Time is a construct of the conscious mind." > "There is no past or future, only NOW." This meant your past could be edited And your future could be *downloaded* Bentov also created a simple code for bending time: Step 1: Induce a theta brainwave state Step 2: Use coherent intention to “collapse” probability That’s it. A 2-step system to hack reality, before quantum science even caught up.

SHOCKING ⚡️ In 1960s, this man discovered the "God formula" that proved: • Past is "changeable" • Future is NOW • Reality is projection Then CIA seized it all. But a declassified document from 2003 reveals why they're terrified. His name was Itzhak Bentov. You may have never heard of him. But his research reshaped how NASA, the CIA, and quantum physicists understand the mind. Bentov said the universe was not “out there” It was inside you He called it the “holographic model of consciousness” You are not a body living in the universe You are the universe living through a body Watch this video carefully to understand it. In 1977, the CIA secretly studied his model. The document? “The Gateway Experience” It was classified for decades and described a shocking method to transcend time and space Page 25 was blacked out for years Why? Because Page 25 revealed this: > "Time is a construct of the conscious mind." > "There is no past or future, only NOW." This meant your past could be edited And your future could be downloaded Bentov also created a simple code for bending time: Step 1: Induce a theta brainwave state Step 2: Use coherent intention to “collapse” probability That’s it. A 2-step system to hack reality, before quantum science even caught up.

Darshak Rana ⚡️

18,698 views • 24 days ago

A Yale professor claims one law of physics decides everything that can and cannot happen in the universe. Drop an egg and it will never jump back into your hand, and nothing in Newton forbids it. Only this law does. His words. 2 million people started his course. Almost nobody made it to lecture 24, where he finally proves it. The man is Ramamurti Shankar, and the way he teaches this is what makes the video worth it. He opens with a 200 year old bet. An engineer named Carnot claimed no engine anyone ever builds can beat his. Two centuries later, no company in America, Japan or China has done it. Shankar shows why in ten minutes, by letting you build a better engine on the blackboard and then shooting it down. Then the move that stays with you. He proves the law of the universe is not a command but a coin toss. Nothing forbids all the air in your room from rushing into one corner while you suffocate in the other. He writes down the odds of it. The number is why you are safe. He ends with a formula so important it is carved on its author's tombstone in Vienna. Shankar says physicists visiting the city skip the concert halls and go read the stone. His point for why this matters: the universe does not forbid the impossible. It just prices it.

A Yale professor claims one law of physics decides everything that can and cannot happen in the universe. Drop an egg and it will never jump back into your hand, and nothing in Newton forbids it. Only this law does. His words. 2 million people started his course. Almost nobody made it to lecture 24, where he finally proves it. The man is Ramamurti Shankar, and the way he teaches this is what makes the video worth it. He opens with a 200 year old bet. An engineer named Carnot claimed no engine anyone ever builds can beat his. Two centuries later, no company in America, Japan or China has done it. Shankar shows why in ten minutes, by letting you build a better engine on the blackboard and then shooting it down. Then the move that stays with you. He proves the law of the universe is not a command but a coin toss. Nothing forbids all the air in your room from rushing into one corner while you suffocate in the other. He writes down the odds of it. The number is why you are safe. He ends with a formula so important it is carved on its author's tombstone in Vienna. Shankar says physicists visiting the city skip the concert halls and go read the stone. His point for why this matters: the universe does not forbid the impossible. It just prices it.

Silverhand

75,978 views • 1 month ago

Ever hear Albert Einstein’s voice? He’s him explaining his formula, E=mc² It is probably the most famous formula in the world, but what exactly does it mean? Let's start by defining each letter in the formula: E = Energy M = Mass C = Speed of light (a very large number) If we were to read the formula, we would say, "Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared." The formula itself is rather simple in that it essentially says that energy and mass are different forms of the same thing; they are interchangeable. So are you saying a beam of light and a banana are different forms of the same thing? Yes, in our head, this may not make sense, but it does in nature. This discovery was groundbreaking at the time because people had previously believed that energy could only be created by kinetic or potential energy. You can increase kinetic energy by accelerating your car. You can increase potential energy by stretching a rubber band. Einstein demonstrated that there was a third form, which is that things have energy because they simply exist. Ok, so why is mass multiplied by the speed of light? Whenever you are converting mass to pure energy, it is by nature moving at the speed of light. Pure energy is an electromagnetic radiation, which travels at 186,000 miles/sec (300,000 km/sec). Ok, cool, but why is the speed of light squared? This again has to do with the nature of energy. If an object is moving twice as fast as another object, it does not have twice as much energy. Rather, it has four times as much energy. Hence, the speed of light is squared, which comes out to a very big number. C^2 is the conversion factor from mass to energy. The bottom line is that even small objects have an immense amount of energy. Through the process of nuclear fusion/fission via nuclear power plants, we can harness some of this energy. In the atomic bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima, there was about 700 milligrams (equivalent to the weight of 1/3 of a dime) of uranium which was converted to energy that destroyed everything within a 1-mile (1.6 km) blast radius.

Ever hear Albert Einstein’s voice? He’s him explaining his formula, E=mc² It is probably the most famous formula in the world, but what exactly does it mean? Let's start by defining each letter in the formula: E = Energy M = Mass C = Speed of light (a very large number) If we were to read the formula, we would say, "Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared." The formula itself is rather simple in that it essentially says that energy and mass are different forms of the same thing; they are interchangeable. So are you saying a beam of light and a banana are different forms of the same thing? Yes, in our head, this may not make sense, but it does in nature. This discovery was groundbreaking at the time because people had previously believed that energy could only be created by kinetic or potential energy. You can increase kinetic energy by accelerating your car. You can increase potential energy by stretching a rubber band. Einstein demonstrated that there was a third form, which is that things have energy because they simply exist. Ok, so why is mass multiplied by the speed of light? Whenever you are converting mass to pure energy, it is by nature moving at the speed of light. Pure energy is an electromagnetic radiation, which travels at 186,000 miles/sec (300,000 km/sec). Ok, cool, but why is the speed of light squared? This again has to do with the nature of energy. If an object is moving twice as fast as another object, it does not have twice as much energy. Rather, it has four times as much energy. Hence, the speed of light is squared, which comes out to a very big number. C^2 is the conversion factor from mass to energy. The bottom line is that even small objects have an immense amount of energy. Through the process of nuclear fusion/fission via nuclear power plants, we can harness some of this energy. In the atomic bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima, there was about 700 milligrams (equivalent to the weight of 1/3 of a dime) of uranium which was converted to energy that destroyed everything within a 1-mile (1.6 km) blast radius.

Historic Vids

2,424,303 views • 3 years ago

If anyone would like to see a full five-minute video of perfect schadenfreude … here's Raise the Colours Flag Wanker™ Ryan Bridge being arrested last night. Several things stand out from the video but mainly his unbelievable levels of entitlement. He starts by trying to direct the police officers in their job and when it becomes clear that they are not having it, resorts to his usual slinging of insults — resulting in his arrest. The rest is a comedy of his lackies pointing the phone at their own faces while Bridge is being PERP-walked to the van. Bridge can be heard telling the guy to get his fingers off the lens and flip the camera. Never one to let an arrest get in the way of a publicity stunt. As he walks, he starts slagging off the lady protester, and it ends with a satisfying slamming of the police van door when one of the lackies shouts; “free Ryan”. LOL 😂 Enjoy — I have almost an hour more footage from last night to go through as well, but this is a perfect start.

If anyone would like to see a full five-minute video of perfect schadenfreude … here's Raise the Colours Flag Wanker™ Ryan Bridge being arrested last night. Several things stand out from the video but mainly his unbelievable levels of entitlement. He starts by trying to direct the police officers in their job and when it becomes clear that they are not having it, resorts to his usual slinging of insults — resulting in his arrest. The rest is a comedy of his lackies pointing the phone at their own faces while Bridge is being PERP-walked to the van. Bridge can be heard telling the guy to get his fingers off the lens and flip the camera. Never one to let an arrest get in the way of a publicity stunt. As he walks, he starts slagging off the lady protester, and it ends with a satisfying slamming of the police van door when one of the lackies shouts; “free Ryan”. LOL 😂 Enjoy — I have almost an hour more footage from last night to go through as well, but this is a perfect start.

Don McGowan

48,966 views • 5 months ago

This woman was at a light when she noticed a black Porsche honking and pointing at her while looking at a white U-Haul van directly behind her. She didn’t think anything of it at first but couldn’t help but notice she was being followed, the police stations were too far and she panicked. She immediately drove to a busy area which was her local Costco. She decided to waste time while walking around Costco for over half an hour. When she came out she still saw the van driving up and down the parking lot while looking for her car. She waited until she didn’t see the van anymore and hurried up and left while calling 9-1-1. While she can’t prove that they were up to something, it couldn’t have been a coincidence that the were following her. I also don’t understand the point of leaving her car while they were following her, I know she felt safe inside but she wouldn’t know if they put an AirTag on her car so they could find her later right? Did she do the right thing then by running into Costco?

This woman was at a light when she noticed a black Porsche honking and pointing at her while looking at a white U-Haul van directly behind her. She didn’t think anything of it at first but couldn’t help but notice she was being followed, the police stations were too far and she panicked. She immediately drove to a busy area which was her local Costco. She decided to waste time while walking around Costco for over half an hour. When she came out she still saw the van driving up and down the parking lot while looking for her car. She waited until she didn’t see the van anymore and hurried up and left while calling 9-1-1. While she can’t prove that they were up to something, it couldn’t have been a coincidence that the were following her. I also don’t understand the point of leaving her car while they were following her, I know she felt safe inside but she wouldn’t know if they put an AirTag on her car so they could find her later right? Did she do the right thing then by running into Costco?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

497,284 views • 6 months ago

NEW: ICE official debunks the media narrative being spun surrounding the enforcement operation involving a 5-year-old boy that's dominating headlines: "When officers approached Conejo Arias, he and his child were in a vehicle. Arias fled from law enforcement on foot, abandoning his child in the middle of winter in a vehicle. One of our officers stayed behind with that child while other officers apprehended his father." "After conducting the arrest, my officers stayed with the child. They cared for him, took him to get something to eat from a drive-through restaurant, and spent hours ensuring he was taken care of. Again, my officers did that, not his father." "My officers did everything they could to reunite him with his family. Tragically, when we approached the door of his residence, the people inside refused to take him in and open the door. Let me say it again: they saw the young boy, and they refused to open the door and take him back."

NEW: ICE official debunks the media narrative being spun surrounding the enforcement operation involving a 5-year-old boy that's dominating headlines: "When officers approached Conejo Arias, he and his child were in a vehicle. Arias fled from law enforcement on foot, abandoning his child in the middle of winter in a vehicle. One of our officers stayed behind with that child while other officers apprehended his father." "After conducting the arrest, my officers stayed with the child. They cared for him, took him to get something to eat from a drive-through restaurant, and spent hours ensuring he was taken care of. Again, my officers did that, not his father." "My officers did everything they could to reunite him with his family. Tragically, when we approached the door of his residence, the people inside refused to take him in and open the door. Let me say it again: they saw the young boy, and they refused to open the door and take him back."

Fox News

168,469 views • 7 months ago

One day, a man was driving his van through a village in southern Xinjiang. A man wearing a cap approached from the roadside with a smile on his face, though his eyes were searching the vehicle for something. Thinking the man might be hungry, the driver offered him some snacks—treats that were hard to come by in the village. However, the smile on the cap-wearer’s face dimmed, and he turned away in disappointment. Sensing something was amiss, the driver decided to follow him home to see if he needed help. Once inside, the man unwrapped layer upon layer of cloth to reveal an old radio. He twisted the dial with force, pointed to his ears, and made muffled sounds in his throat. In that moment, the driver finally understood: this man, who could not hear the world, was using all his strength to find batteries for his silent radio. His earlier gazing at the van had simply been a desperate attempt to find a vendor selling batteries. The driver, a kind soul, grasped his meaning immediately. He took him to the county town to buy fitting batteries, purchased shoes and other daily necessities for him, and promised to take him out again next time. On the way back, as the man sat in the passenger seat with his beloved radio clutched in his hands, his smile returned—bright as it was at the beginning. But this time, the joy came not from the radio waves, but from the love of a stranger. I do not wish to specifically mention their ethnicities, for some warmth needs no labels. It is just like sunlight falling on everyone's shoulders, never asking who you are.🌞

One day, a man was driving his van through a village in southern Xinjiang. A man wearing a cap approached from the roadside with a smile on his face, though his eyes were searching the vehicle for something. Thinking the man might be hungry, the driver offered him some snacks—treats that were hard to come by in the village. However, the smile on the cap-wearer’s face dimmed, and he turned away in disappointment. Sensing something was amiss, the driver decided to follow him home to see if he needed help. Once inside, the man unwrapped layer upon layer of cloth to reveal an old radio. He twisted the dial with force, pointed to his ears, and made muffled sounds in his throat. In that moment, the driver finally understood: this man, who could not hear the world, was using all his strength to find batteries for his silent radio. His earlier gazing at the van had simply been a desperate attempt to find a vendor selling batteries. The driver, a kind soul, grasped his meaning immediately. He took him to the county town to buy fitting batteries, purchased shoes and other daily necessities for him, and promised to take him out again next time. On the way back, as the man sat in the passenger seat with his beloved radio clutched in his hands, his smile returned—bright as it was at the beginning. But this time, the joy came not from the radio waves, but from the love of a stranger. I do not wish to specifically mention their ethnicities, for some warmth needs no labels. It is just like sunlight falling on everyone's shoulders, never asking who you are.🌞

AL-fira 🇨🇳

34,970 views • 4 months ago

Class of 1984 (1982) Class of 1984 was a commercial success relative to its modest $3.2–$4.3 million budget, earning over $6–$7 million at the box office. It achieved broader financial success through the home video and cable markets, estimated at $15–$20 million in total. The film is celebrated as a definitive cult classic of the early 1980s. Its "video nasty" reputation stemmed from extreme violence, including a graphic table saw death and a brutal rape scene, which nearly earned it an X rating. Modern audiences value it as a bleak, nihilistic time capsule of the early '80s punk aesthetic and urban decay. It is famous for featuring a young, pre-Family Ties Michael J. Fox in a supporting role. Its status is solidified by high-end boutique releases, such as the Shout! Factory Collector’s Edition. The film was directly influenced by A Clockwork Orange (1971) and Blackboard Jungle (1955). In turn, it influenced several "school violence" and vigilante films: It spawned two sci-fi-themed sequels: Class of 1999 (1990) and Class of 1999 II: The Substitute (1994). Films like The Principal (1987), The Substitute (1996), and Class of Nuke 'Em High (1986) are often cited as spiritual successors or parodies. Timothy Van Patten, who played the menacing gang leader Peter Stegman, is now better known as an Emmy-winning director of prestigious series like The Sopranos and Boardwalk Empire. Van Patten personally wrote and performed the piano concerto his character plays in the film, a scene often cited as a highlight that revealed Stegman's complex, "yuppie" background. While director Mark Lester expected Van Patten to become a major acting star following his "riveting" performance, Van Patten eventually found his greatest success behind the camera. His portrayal remains iconic for its use of low-angle shots to maximize his threatening presence despite his clean-cut appearance.

Class of 1984 (1982) Class of 1984 was a commercial success relative to its modest $3.2–$4.3 million budget, earning over $6–$7 million at the box office. It achieved broader financial success through the home video and cable markets, estimated at $15–$20 million in total. The film is celebrated as a definitive cult classic of the early 1980s. Its "video nasty" reputation stemmed from extreme violence, including a graphic table saw death and a brutal rape scene, which nearly earned it an X rating. Modern audiences value it as a bleak, nihilistic time capsule of the early '80s punk aesthetic and urban decay. It is famous for featuring a young, pre-Family Ties Michael J. Fox in a supporting role. Its status is solidified by high-end boutique releases, such as the Shout! Factory Collector’s Edition. The film was directly influenced by A Clockwork Orange (1971) and Blackboard Jungle (1955). In turn, it influenced several "school violence" and vigilante films: It spawned two sci-fi-themed sequels: Class of 1999 (1990) and Class of 1999 II: The Substitute (1994). Films like The Principal (1987), The Substitute (1996), and Class of Nuke 'Em High (1986) are often cited as spiritual successors or parodies. Timothy Van Patten, who played the menacing gang leader Peter Stegman, is now better known as an Emmy-winning director of prestigious series like The Sopranos and Boardwalk Empire. Van Patten personally wrote and performed the piano concerto his character plays in the film, a scene often cited as a highlight that revealed Stegman's complex, "yuppie" background. While director Mark Lester expected Van Patten to become a major acting star following his "riveting" performance, Van Patten eventually found his greatest success behind the camera. His portrayal remains iconic for its use of low-angle shots to maximize his threatening presence despite his clean-cut appearance.

Tom😈Loves❤️Horror😱

11,070 views • 8 months ago

Did you know it’s against “the rules” to even post a video humming inside this so called “antechamber?” Why wouldn’t they want people to hear the incredible acoustics that emanate from it? Could it be because we’re not supposed to know that this mini-chamber was an acoustical filter? As Christopher Dunn states in his book ‘The Giza Power Plant’ “After building the resonators and installing them inside the Grand Gallery, the ancient Egyptians would have wanted to focus a sound of specific frequency, that is, a pure or harmonic chord, into the King's Chamber. They would be assured of doing so if they installed an acoustic filter between the Grand Gallery and the King's Chamber. By installing baffles inside the Antechamber, sound waves traveling from the Grand Gallery through the passageway into the King's Chamber would be filtered as they passed through, allowing only a single frequency or harmonic of that frequency to enter the resonant chamber. Those sound waves with a wavelength that did not coincide with the dimensions between the baffles would be filtered out, thereby ensuring that no interference sound waves could enter the resonant King's Chamber to reduce the output of the system”

Did you know it’s against “the rules” to even post a video humming inside this so called “antechamber?” Why wouldn’t they want people to hear the incredible acoustics that emanate from it? Could it be because we’re not supposed to know that this mini-chamber was an acoustical filter? As Christopher Dunn states in his book ‘The Giza Power Plant’ “After building the resonators and installing them inside the Grand Gallery, the ancient Egyptians would have wanted to focus a sound of specific frequency, that is, a pure or harmonic chord, into the King's Chamber. They would be assured of doing so if they installed an acoustic filter between the Grand Gallery and the King's Chamber. By installing baffles inside the Antechamber, sound waves traveling from the Grand Gallery through the passageway into the King's Chamber would be filtered as they passed through, allowing only a single frequency or harmonic of that frequency to enter the resonant chamber. Those sound waves with a wavelength that did not coincide with the dimensions between the baffles would be filtered out, thereby ensuring that no interference sound waves could enter the resonant King's Chamber to reduce the output of the system”

Megalithic Marvels

310,208 views • 9 months ago

Elon Musk explained how he makes every decision in a single sentence. Musk: “Whatever the limiting factor is on speed, I’m gonna attack that.” Not manage it. Not commission a study on it. Not make peace with it. Attack it. Musk: “If capital is a limiting factor, then I’ll solve for capital. If it’s not a limiting factor, I’ll solve for something else.” Sounds simple. It’s the furthest thing from simple. The entire professional class is built on the opposite instinct. They identify the constraint. Then they build a career around managing it. They become the expert on why things can’t move faster. Why it’s too expensive. Too risky. Too early. They don’t solve for the limiting factor. They become the limiting factor. And they get promoted for it. The biggest bottleneck in most organizations isn’t capital. Isn’t technology. Isn’t regulation. It’s the person in the room whose entire identity depends on the problem staying unsolved. Because once the problem is solved, so is their job title. Musk doesn’t manage that loop. He breaks it. He asks the one question the room agreed to stop asking. Why is this the speed. Why is this the cost. Why is this the timeline. And when the only answer is “because that’s how we’ve always done it”… He knows he’s found the real constraint. The human one. This is why he operates across rockets, cars, AI, brain interfaces, tunnels, and social media at once. Not because he’s reckless. Because the method works everywhere. Find the bottleneck. Solve for it. Move to the next one. Repeat until physics stops you. Not politics. Not bureaucracy. Not consensus. Physics. Most people never get anywhere near the physics. They stop at the first human objection and treat it like a law of nature. Musk treats human objections as engineering problems. That’s what his competitors can’t solve for. Not his capital. Not his reach. He refuses to honor the constraints they’ve spent entire careers respecting. And once you watch someone walk straight through the wall you built your whole life around… You don’t just question the wall. You question everything you built against it.

Elon Musk explained how he makes every decision in a single sentence. Musk: “Whatever the limiting factor is on speed, I’m gonna attack that.” Not manage it. Not commission a study on it. Not make peace with it. Attack it. Musk: “If capital is a limiting factor, then I’ll solve for capital. If it’s not a limiting factor, I’ll solve for something else.” Sounds simple. It’s the furthest thing from simple. The entire professional class is built on the opposite instinct. They identify the constraint. Then they build a career around managing it. They become the expert on why things can’t move faster. Why it’s too expensive. Too risky. Too early. They don’t solve for the limiting factor. They become the limiting factor. And they get promoted for it. The biggest bottleneck in most organizations isn’t capital. Isn’t technology. Isn’t regulation. It’s the person in the room whose entire identity depends on the problem staying unsolved. Because once the problem is solved, so is their job title. Musk doesn’t manage that loop. He breaks it. He asks the one question the room agreed to stop asking. Why is this the speed. Why is this the cost. Why is this the timeline. And when the only answer is “because that’s how we’ve always done it”… He knows he’s found the real constraint. The human one. This is why he operates across rockets, cars, AI, brain interfaces, tunnels, and social media at once. Not because he’s reckless. Because the method works everywhere. Find the bottleneck. Solve for it. Move to the next one. Repeat until physics stops you. Not politics. Not bureaucracy. Not consensus. Physics. Most people never get anywhere near the physics. They stop at the first human objection and treat it like a law of nature. Musk treats human objections as engineering problems. That’s what his competitors can’t solve for. Not his capital. Not his reach. He refuses to honor the constraints they’ve spent entire careers respecting. And once you watch someone walk straight through the wall you built your whole life around… You don’t just question the wall. You question everything you built against it.

Dustin

71,640 views • 3 months ago

I got pretty emotional while editing this if I’m being honest. Touring is never an easy grind as it is, but leaving your 2 year old girl for an entire month during the most formative time of her life is a sacrifice that doesn’t go unnoticed. I could tell how much he missed his girls and how it was eating away at him, but it really went to show me how truly dedicated he is to his career and how much he believes in the future of Jack & Jack. Thank you to you guys for making it all worthwile and coming to the shows and bringing unbelievable energy night in and night out. As independent artists with no on the road security and traveling through 11 different countries over 28 days, all combined with how expensive tour life overseas can be at our current venue sizes, bringing the girls with felt like an impossible task. But him, Geneva, and Hayvie took it all on the chin purely out of belief in our future. Even typing this out now motivates me to do things bigger and better year after year so we can ensure he never has to leave his girls behind again… Gilinsky is truly the best dad I know and I’m proud of these 3 for managing to get through this past month without each other ❤️ -J

I got pretty emotional while editing this if I’m being honest. Touring is never an easy grind as it is, but leaving your 2 year old girl for an entire month during the most formative time of her life is a sacrifice that doesn’t go unnoticed. I could tell how much he missed his girls and how it was eating away at him, but it really went to show me how truly dedicated he is to his career and how much he believes in the future of Jack & Jack. Thank you to you guys for making it all worthwile and coming to the shows and bringing unbelievable energy night in and night out. As independent artists with no on the road security and traveling through 11 different countries over 28 days, all combined with how expensive tour life overseas can be at our current venue sizes, bringing the girls with felt like an impossible task. But him, Geneva, and Hayvie took it all on the chin purely out of belief in our future. Even typing this out now motivates me to do things bigger and better year after year so we can ensure he never has to leave his girls behind again… Gilinsky is truly the best dad I know and I’m proud of these 3 for managing to get through this past month without each other ❤️ -J

J

49,075 views • 1 year ago

Next in who after the Ramanujan Series? If Ramanujan was the Source Code, Mudumbai Seshachalu Narasimhan (1932-2021) was the Compiler. He took the raw energy of Indian mathematical intuition & turned it into a formal, global language that even the top physicists in the world now use to explain reality. M.S. Narasimhan (known as MSN) was born into a rural family in Thandarai, Tamil Nadu. MSN was not a fan of the repeat what you are told school system. He was obsessed with extra problems at the end of textbooks that required original thinking. There was no high school in his village. To get an education, he famously traveled several KMs every day on a bullock cart. He ended up at Loyola College, Madras, under Father Racine. Racine realized early MSN was a fearless thinker who could handle the latest French mathematics. In the 1960s, mathematics was split into silos: people who studied shapes (Geometry) did not talk much to people who studied eqns (Algebra). Narasimhan was the man who found a wormhole connecting them & the career defining moment was the "Narasimhan-Seshadri Theorem" (1965). This is the Kohinoor of his career. Working with his lifelong friend C.S. Seshadri, he proved a result so deep it is still taught at every major uni today. They linked Unitary Representations (a complex way of describing symmetries in topology) to Stable Vector Bundles (a way of describing shapes in algebraic geometry). Yrs later, physicists realized this math was exactly what they needed to describe Gauge Theory & Quantum Chromodynamics (the study of how sub-atomic particles stick together). If we ever hear a mathematician talk about the Harder-Narasimhan Filtration, they are referring to a sorting machine MSN co-invented. In complex geometry, some bundles are stable (smooth) & some are unstable (jagged). Narasimhan & Günter Harder proved that every jagged bundle can be perfectly sliced into a unique sequence of smooth ones. This filtration is now used in Number Theory to solve problems that Ramanujan himself might have found fascinating. MSN was famously absent-mindedly brilliant, his wife, Sakuntala (a renowned singer), once recalled that for their honeymoon, MSN packed a suitcase full of Tamil literature & advanced math books. He spent the trip solving eqns be/w sightseeing! A former student recalls playing tennis when MSN walked up & asked, "You have learned a lot of good mathematics, but do you have any mathematical problems to work on?". They spent the next 10 days working day & night to prove a major result in differential geometry. His philosophy was: "Solve the big problem 1st, then worry about the details." MSN is 1 of the most decorated Indian scientists in history: King Faisal International Prize (2006): Often called the Arab Nobel, he won this jointly with Sir Simon Donaldson for his work linking math & physics. FRS & Padma Bhushan: He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society (1989) & awarded the Padma Bhushan (1990). Chevalier de l'ordre National du Mérite: The French govt knighted him for his work in bridging the Indian & French schools of mathematics. He served as the 1st chair of the National Board for Higher Mathematics & headed the math division at the ICTP in Italy. He made sure that Indian students did not have to leave India to become world-class.

Next in who after the Ramanujan Series? If Ramanujan was the Source Code, Mudumbai Seshachalu Narasimhan (1932-2021) was the Compiler. He took the raw energy of Indian mathematical intuition & turned it into a formal, global language that even the top physicists in the world now use to explain reality. M.S. Narasimhan (known as MSN) was born into a rural family in Thandarai, Tamil Nadu. MSN was not a fan of the repeat what you are told school system. He was obsessed with extra problems at the end of textbooks that required original thinking. There was no high school in his village. To get an education, he famously traveled several KMs every day on a bullock cart. He ended up at Loyola College, Madras, under Father Racine. Racine realized early MSN was a fearless thinker who could handle the latest French mathematics. In the 1960s, mathematics was split into silos: people who studied shapes (Geometry) did not talk much to people who studied eqns (Algebra). Narasimhan was the man who found a wormhole connecting them & the career defining moment was the "Narasimhan-Seshadri Theorem" (1965). This is the Kohinoor of his career. Working with his lifelong friend C.S. Seshadri, he proved a result so deep it is still taught at every major uni today. They linked Unitary Representations (a complex way of describing symmetries in topology) to Stable Vector Bundles (a way of describing shapes in algebraic geometry). Yrs later, physicists realized this math was exactly what they needed to describe Gauge Theory & Quantum Chromodynamics (the study of how sub-atomic particles stick together). If we ever hear a mathematician talk about the Harder-Narasimhan Filtration, they are referring to a sorting machine MSN co-invented. In complex geometry, some bundles are stable (smooth) & some are unstable (jagged). Narasimhan & Günter Harder proved that every jagged bundle can be perfectly sliced into a unique sequence of smooth ones. This filtration is now used in Number Theory to solve problems that Ramanujan himself might have found fascinating. MSN was famously absent-mindedly brilliant, his wife, Sakuntala (a renowned singer), once recalled that for their honeymoon, MSN packed a suitcase full of Tamil literature & advanced math books. He spent the trip solving eqns be/w sightseeing! A former student recalls playing tennis when MSN walked up & asked, "You have learned a lot of good mathematics, but do you have any mathematical problems to work on?". They spent the next 10 days working day & night to prove a major result in differential geometry. His philosophy was: "Solve the big problem 1st, then worry about the details." MSN is 1 of the most decorated Indian scientists in history: King Faisal International Prize (2006): Often called the Arab Nobel, he won this jointly with Sir Simon Donaldson for his work linking math & physics. FRS & Padma Bhushan: He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society (1989) & awarded the Padma Bhushan (1990). Chevalier de l'ordre National du Mérite: The French govt knighted him for his work in bridging the Indian & French schools of mathematics. He served as the 1st chair of the National Board for Higher Mathematics & headed the math division at the ICTP in Italy. He made sure that Indian students did not have to leave India to become world-class.

Parimal

13,502 views • 4 months ago

I love how Joss & Gawin varied multiple emotions in a span of 2 minutes of Arnold & Tua at the hospital. Joss accurately depicted the guilt of not talking about an injury he tried to endure then switching to consoling his boyfriend on wanting to enjoy Swing night with him until he could use affection with total bliss on his face being off the hook. As for Gawin, I love the daggers he threw through his glares like he's about to drop an immense amount of nagging but it turned into worry & concern ending with spoiling his beloved with understanding & care. Arnold seems to be more worried about Tua knowing he sacrificed his sprained ankle for the sake of them enjoying Swing night rather than being afraid of the consequences of not giving it more time to heal. On the other hand, Tua is disappointed in Arnold for taking the risk of worsening his condition but he still gives in to helping him recover even while sulking #OnlyFriendsDreamOnEP11 #JossGawin #จอสกวิน

I love how Joss & Gawin varied multiple emotions in a span of 2 minutes of Arnold & Tua at the hospital. Joss accurately depicted the guilt of not talking about an injury he tried to endure then switching to consoling his boyfriend on wanting to enjoy Swing night with him until he could use affection with total bliss on his face being off the hook. As for Gawin, I love the daggers he threw through his glares like he's about to drop an immense amount of nagging but it turned into worry & concern ending with spoiling his beloved with understanding & care. Arnold seems to be more worried about Tua knowing he sacrificed his sprained ankle for the sake of them enjoying Swing night rather than being afraid of the consequences of not giving it more time to heal. On the other hand, Tua is disappointed in Arnold for taking the risk of worsening his condition but he still gives in to helping him recover even while sulking #OnlyFriendsDreamOnEP11 #JossGawin #จอสกวิน

alex 🐼💛

15,974 views • 4 months ago

BREAKING NEWS: CHINESE SCIENTISTS PROVED EINSTEIN WRONG by performing an “impossible” experiment, a top US science journal reported in its latest issue. Iconic scientist Albert Einstein outlined an experiment on paper a century ago to disprove claims by an up-and-coming Danish physicist named Nils Bohr. But Chinese scientist Pan Jianwei and his team actually managed to do the experiment in real life, said a report in a publication of the American Physical Review. This week, newspaper headlines are saying things like “Chinese physicists prove Einstein wrong and put century-old debate to an end”. But that’s actually not true. And I’ll explain why below. . LASER TWEEZERS But let’s start with what is true – and is pretty amazing, too. The Chinese team managed to measure the physical impact that light has when it hits a surface—and they did it by isolating a single photon of light and shooting it at a single atom, held in place using a pair of “tweezers” made out of tiny laser beams. Why and how did they do this and what were they trying to prove? Full details and diagrams can be found in the video. Why do I say the headline writer got it wrong? This one says the Chinese scientists “put century-old debate to an end”. . NOT ACTUALLY TRUE That’s not true. The debate ended more than half a century ago, by which time, the majority of the world’s physicists had decided that Bohr was right and Einstein was wrong. And this wasn’t just a measure of opinions – many experiments had been done to reinforce this fact. So what the Chinese scientists just did was to create an elegant and precise experimental set-up that reinforces what physicists had already agreed on—and which can be replicated around the world to make further discoveries. So it is a very impressive feat, for sure. Meanwhile, thanks to Einstein, Bohr and Pan for showing the world exactly how photons work. They are very important – and remember, this information is being sent to you right now by a large army of photons!

BREAKING NEWS: CHINESE SCIENTISTS PROVED EINSTEIN WRONG by performing an “impossible” experiment, a top US science journal reported in its latest issue. Iconic scientist Albert Einstein outlined an experiment on paper a century ago to disprove claims by an up-and-coming Danish physicist named Nils Bohr. But Chinese scientist Pan Jianwei and his team actually managed to do the experiment in real life, said a report in a publication of the American Physical Review. This week, newspaper headlines are saying things like “Chinese physicists prove Einstein wrong and put century-old debate to an end”. But that’s actually not true. And I’ll explain why below. . LASER TWEEZERS But let’s start with what is true – and is pretty amazing, too. The Chinese team managed to measure the physical impact that light has when it hits a surface—and they did it by isolating a single photon of light and shooting it at a single atom, held in place using a pair of “tweezers” made out of tiny laser beams. Why and how did they do this and what were they trying to prove? Full details and diagrams can be found in the video. Why do I say the headline writer got it wrong? This one says the Chinese scientists “put century-old debate to an end”. . NOT ACTUALLY TRUE That’s not true. The debate ended more than half a century ago, by which time, the majority of the world’s physicists had decided that Bohr was right and Einstein was wrong. And this wasn’t just a measure of opinions – many experiments had been done to reinforce this fact. So what the Chinese scientists just did was to create an elegant and precise experimental set-up that reinforces what physicists had already agreed on—and which can be replicated around the world to make further discoveries. So it is a very impressive feat, for sure. Meanwhile, thanks to Einstein, Bohr and Pan for showing the world exactly how photons work. They are very important – and remember, this information is being sent to you right now by a large army of photons!

Nury Vittachi

35,688 views • 9 months ago

"The Israelis robbed me of my childhood." Mohammed al-Jirjawi was ten years old when an Israeli occupation soldier struck him in the face with the butt of her rifle at a checkpoint in Gaza, splitting open his forehead and driving the blow into his eye until it bled. He had done nothing, he says, just a child waiting to pass through. Amid the shelling, with no cars on the road, his father Ibrahim carried him on foot to al-Shifa hospital, where doctors found the retina was destroyed and the eye could not be saved. Before the injury, Mohammed could see, go to school, run and play with his friends. Now he is left with one eye, and his father describes a boy who still wakes each morning saying his eye hurts, asking to be taken to a doctor, refusing to accept that it is gone. They fitted him with a glass eye, but it broke, and there was nowhere to replace it: the hospitals had been emptied and destroyed, the eye hospital occupied by the army, al-Shifa being demolished as the occupation tore through it. A bright third-grade student before the genocide, Mohammed now lives inside the nightmare of what was done to him, one of countless Gaza children maimed for life and left without the care to heal. Anadolu العربية

"The Israelis robbed me of my childhood." Mohammed al-Jirjawi was ten years old when an Israeli occupation soldier struck him in the face with the butt of her rifle at a checkpoint in Gaza, splitting open his forehead and driving the blow into his eye until it bled. He had done nothing, he says, just a child waiting to pass through. Amid the shelling, with no cars on the road, his father Ibrahim carried him on foot to al-Shifa hospital, where doctors found the retina was destroyed and the eye could not be saved. Before the injury, Mohammed could see, go to school, run and play with his friends. Now he is left with one eye, and his father describes a boy who still wakes each morning saying his eye hurts, asking to be taken to a doctor, refusing to accept that it is gone. They fitted him with a glass eye, but it broke, and there was nowhere to replace it: the hospitals had been emptied and destroyed, the eye hospital occupied by the army, al-Shifa being demolished as the occupation tore through it. A bright third-grade student before the genocide, Mohammed now lives inside the nightmare of what was done to him, one of countless Gaza children maimed for life and left without the care to heal. Anadolu العربية

Translating Falasteen (Palestine)

16,497 views • 2 months ago