Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Violet Myers 🤝 Savannah Bond Taking anal while bouncing up & down on long cocks #VioletMyers #SavannahBond Violet Myers SAVANNAH BOND #PAWG #Latina #Cowgirlsex #Anal

Dark Panther X

15,395 subscribers

156,227 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #VioletMyers #SavannahBond #PAWG #Latina #Cowgirlsex #Anal

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dream team 💥👑✨💯 SlimThickVic Vicki Chase Nicole Doshi Savannah Bond Vanna Bardot Violet Myers 😍🔥❤️ BLACKED RAW

Dream team 💥👑✨💯 SlimThickVic Vicki Chase Nicole Doshi Savannah Bond Vanna Bardot Violet Myers 😍🔥❤️ BLACKED RAW

ADULT BOX🔞

43,462 views • 2 years ago

One Gotta Go: Violet Myers, Luna Star, Savannah Bond, or Angela White? 👀🔥🏀 Me and Vante got into a heated debate I said Savannah Bond gotta go, he said Luna Star washed 😭 The league might never be the same after this one… Who you dropping from the starting lineup⁉️ Reply with your pick ⬇️ #VioletMyers #LunaStar #SavannahBond #AngelaWhite #OneGottaGo #BasketballTalk #NSFWDebate #AdultStars #EngageWithThis #WhoYouCutting #TrendingTopics #FYP

Sensitive content

One Gotta Go: Violet Myers, Luna Star, Savannah Bond, or Angela White? 👀🔥🏀 Me and Vante got into a heated debate I said Savannah Bond gotta go, he said Luna Star washed 😭 The league might never be the same after this one… Who you dropping from the starting lineup⁉️ Reply with your pick ⬇️ #VioletMyers #LunaStar #SavannahBond #AngelaWhite #OneGottaGo #BasketballTalk #NSFWDebate #AdultStars #EngageWithThis #WhoYouCutting #TrendingTopics #FYP

Torreyoungin

177,283 views • 11 months ago

Savannah reacts to the fight between Rick & Joe on #Survivor50, revealing we got a "tamed down" version of what actually happened. She goes on to say, "I haven't seen a blow-up like that on Survivor in a while." Full interview with Savannah Louie:

Savannah reacts to the fight between Rick & Joe on #Survivor50, revealing we got a "tamed down" version of what actually happened. She goes on to say, "I haven't seen a blow-up like that on Survivor in a while." Full interview with Savannah Louie:

Mike Bloom

408,038 views • 4 months ago

Violet myers opened up about the stigma against the Advlt entertainment industry when other Hollywood actors have s3x on camera even though its softlaunched she named EUPHORIA as an example and says it's hypocritical because they are P6dophil6s and they allow that on HBO max but if it was on c0rn hub it would have been taken down. "We are sex therapists I don't understand the stigma"

Violet myers opened up about the stigma against the Advlt entertainment industry when other Hollywood actors have s3x on camera even though its softlaunched she named EUPHORIA as an example and says it's hypocritical because they are P6dophil6s and they allow that on HBO max but if it was on c0rn hub it would have been taken down. "We are sex therapists I don't understand the stigma"

𝙔𝙖gi

33,644 views • 11 days ago

Mike Myers on the genesis of 'Austin Powers' (1997): "After my dad died in 1991, I was taking stock of his influence on me as a person and his influence on me with comedy in general. So 'Austin Powers' (1997) was a tribute to my father, who [introduced me to] James Bond, Peter Sellers, The Beatles, The Goodies, Peter Cook and Dudley Moore. I wrote it in 1995, and the bones of the script came out in two weeks. It was one of those things where I didn’t know if anybody would get this movie who didn’t grow up in my house. But when I showed it to [director] Jay Roach — we had met at a party and become movie buddies — he gave me 10 pages of typewritten notes. Everything he said made it better." ("‘Austin Powers’ at 20: Mike Myers, Jay Roach, More Spill Secrets in Shagadelic Oral History", Ryan Parker, The Hollywood Reporter, 2017)

Mike Myers on the genesis of 'Austin Powers' (1997): "After my dad died in 1991, I was taking stock of his influence on me as a person and his influence on me with comedy in general. So 'Austin Powers' (1997) was a tribute to my father, who [introduced me to] James Bond, Peter Sellers, The Beatles, The Goodies, Peter Cook and Dudley Moore. I wrote it in 1995, and the bones of the script came out in two weeks. It was one of those things where I didn’t know if anybody would get this movie who didn’t grow up in my house. But when I showed it to [director] Jay Roach — we had met at a party and become movie buddies — he gave me 10 pages of typewritten notes. Everything he said made it better." ("‘Austin Powers’ at 20: Mike Myers, Jay Roach, More Spill Secrets in Shagadelic Oral History", Ryan Parker, The Hollywood Reporter, 2017)

DepressedBergman

640,656 views • 5 months ago

Violet Myers revealed her No Jumper interview went viral unexpectedly because she and Kiki were high and joking around, which made them very open and led to bold, unfiltered statements. She added that, as a new creator, she was also trying to stand out on her agent’s advice, and a half-joking fetish comment ended up taking off online and getting reshared widely, turning the moment into a recurring viral topic. “So when we said that, I really did not expect that to go viral. Cuz it was just some dumb sh1t we were saying. But we were like, Let's just say like what we talk about in our normal day”

Sensitive content

Violet Myers revealed her No Jumper interview went viral unexpectedly because she and Kiki were high and joking around, which made them very open and led to bold, unfiltered statements. She added that, as a new creator, she was also trying to stand out on her agent’s advice, and a half-joking fetish comment ended up taking off online and getting reshared widely, turning the moment into a recurring viral topic. “So when we said that, I really did not expect that to go viral. Cuz it was just some dumb sh1t we were saying. But we were like, Let's just say like what we talk about in our normal day”

CLPX

996,634 views • 23 days ago

Violet Myers revealed that a 5 to 6-inch d1ck is her perfect boyfriend size not too big, not too small. She said bigger d1cks work better on camera because the penetration is easier to see, but in her personal life she prefers an average sized d1ck. She also admitted she has a small cervix, making very big d1cks uncomfortable and sometimes forcing her to pause filming to give her vag1na a break. “I feel like four as long as it has some girth is good too because I don't know about other women but my vag1na is pretty I have a very small cervix so l can't really take d1ck like that when I'm taking it on camera I feel like I'm struggling sometimes I'll be like pause the camera like I need give my vag1na a break”

Sensitive content

Violet Myers revealed that a 5 to 6-inch d1ck is her perfect boyfriend size not too big, not too small. She said bigger d1cks work better on camera because the penetration is easier to see, but in her personal life she prefers an average sized d1ck. She also admitted she has a small cervix, making very big d1cks uncomfortable and sometimes forcing her to pause filming to give her vag1na a break. “I feel like four as long as it has some girth is good too because I don't know about other women but my vag1na is pretty I have a very small cervix so l can't really take d1ck like that when I'm taking it on camera I feel like I'm struggling sometimes I'll be like pause the camera like I need give my vag1na a break”

CLPX

128,278 views • 19 days ago

🚨 Ex-boyfriend stabs mother of two to death at Skyline Chili’s Restaurant while she worked because she ended their relationship Alyssa “Ally” Hill was working her regular shift when her ex, 37-year-old Rick Wright, walked in. She asked another server to handle him so she wouldn’t have to interact. No argument. No conversation. Nothing. Wright sat for several minutes wearing a military-style hat, then pulled a large military knife from a sheath on his hip. He pushed past people, stabbed her in the chest face-to-face, and as she tried to flee, plunged the knife into her back. She died from her injuries. Customers and coworkers chased the killer out. He was caught at a bank across the street smiling and waving to cameras, proud of what he had done. Wright has a long violent record including robbery, assault, menacing, and drug trafficking. He was on probation for assaulting a police officer when he murdered Ally. In court he pleaded not guilty. Bond was set at $1 million. Ally was a devoted single mother who recognized the red flags and left the relationship. She did everything right. A known violent predator still hunted her down at her workplace and slaughtered her in cold blood. How many more innocent mothers have to be butchered before these monsters stay locked up where they belong?

🚨 Ex-boyfriend stabs mother of two to death at Skyline Chili’s Restaurant while she worked because she ended their relationship Alyssa “Ally” Hill was working her regular shift when her ex, 37-year-old Rick Wright, walked in. She asked another server to handle him so she wouldn’t have to interact. No argument. No conversation. Nothing. Wright sat for several minutes wearing a military-style hat, then pulled a large military knife from a sheath on his hip. He pushed past people, stabbed her in the chest face-to-face, and as she tried to flee, plunged the knife into her back. She died from her injuries. Customers and coworkers chased the killer out. He was caught at a bank across the street smiling and waving to cameras, proud of what he had done. Wright has a long violent record including robbery, assault, menacing, and drug trafficking. He was on probation for assaulting a police officer when he murdered Ally. In court he pleaded not guilty. Bond was set at $1 million. Ally was a devoted single mother who recognized the red flags and left the relationship. She did everything right. A known violent predator still hunted her down at her workplace and slaughtered her in cold blood. How many more innocent mothers have to be butchered before these monsters stay locked up where they belong?

i Expose Racists & Pedos

64,307 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Ex-boyfriend stabs mother of two to death at Chili’s Restaurant while she worked because she ended their relationship Alyssa “Ally” Hill was working her regular shift when her ex, 37-year-old Rick Wright, walked in. She asked another server to handle him so she wouldn’t have to interact. No argument. No conversation. Nothing. Wright sat for several minutes wearing a military-style hat, then pulled a large military knife from a sheath on his hip. He pushed past people, stabbed her in the chest face-to-face, and as she tried to flee, plunged the knife into her back. She died from her injuries. Customers and coworkers chased the killer out. He was caught at a bank across the street smiling and waving to cameras, proud of what he had done. Wright has a long violent record including robbery, assault, menacing, and drug trafficking. He was on probation for assaulting a police officer when he murdered Ally. In court he pleaded not guilty. Bond was set at $1 million. Ally was a devoted single mother who recognized the red flags and left the relationship. She did everything right. A known violent predator still hunted her down at her workplace and slaughtered her in cold blood. How many more innocent mothers have to be butchered before these monsters stay locked up where they belong?

🚨 Ex-boyfriend stabs mother of two to death at Chili’s Restaurant while she worked because she ended their relationship Alyssa “Ally” Hill was working her regular shift when her ex, 37-year-old Rick Wright, walked in. She asked another server to handle him so she wouldn’t have to interact. No argument. No conversation. Nothing. Wright sat for several minutes wearing a military-style hat, then pulled a large military knife from a sheath on his hip. He pushed past people, stabbed her in the chest face-to-face, and as she tried to flee, plunged the knife into her back. She died from her injuries. Customers and coworkers chased the killer out. He was caught at a bank across the street smiling and waving to cameras, proud of what he had done. Wright has a long violent record including robbery, assault, menacing, and drug trafficking. He was on probation for assaulting a police officer when he murdered Ally. In court he pleaded not guilty. Bond was set at $1 million. Ally was a devoted single mother who recognized the red flags and left the relationship. She did everything right. A known violent predator still hunted her down at her workplace and slaughtered her in cold blood. How many more innocent mothers have to be butchered before these monsters stay locked up where they belong?

i Expose Racists & Pedos

44,673 views • 1 month ago

What does the writing of Katy Perry, Hemingway, and The Bible have in common? Mark Forsyth has the answer. He studied history's greatest writers and noticed how they used the same rhetorical formulas. Here's what you need to know: 1. The formulas are timeless (and still work). 2. Where to begin? Try taking the last word of one sentence and repeating it as the first word in the next. It gives the illusion of logic. Like this one from Yoda: "Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hatred. Hatred leads to suffering." 3. An example from Malcolm X: "Once you change your philosophy, you change your thought pattern. Once you change your thought pattern, you change your attitude. Once you change your attitude, it changes your behavior pattern and then you go on into some action." 4. It's a mystery why, but people love to hear a string of words that begins with the same letter. "Two to Tango" is a heck of a lot more memorable than "Two to Waltz." 5. From his book, Elements of Eloquence: "Adjectives in English absolutely have to be in this order: opinion-size-age-shape-colour-origin-material-purpose Noun." 6. People will tell you to write only what's necessary, but endless repetition can be a way to emphasize something. Katy Perry's repetition of opposites is logically unnecessary, but it works: "'Cause you're hot then you're cold, You're yes then you're no, You're in then you're out, You're up then you're down, You're wrong when it's right, It's black and it's white, We fight, we break up, We kiss, we make up." 7. Wedding vows have the same kind of repetition: "For better or for worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health..." 8. JFK leaned on a rhetorical device called a Chiasmus, where you take the first half of a sentence and say it backward. You see it in sentences like "Mankind must put an end to war—or war will put an end to mankind" and "Ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country." 9. I like the Chiasmus because it's so easy to implement. Here's another example of a Chiasmus, like when Cormac McCarthy wrote: "You forget what you want to remember, and you remember what you want to forget." 10. Language is ruled by the mob. Doesn't matter what the committees think. If everybody uses a word in a certain way, then that's what it means. 11. Most of Shakespeare's famous lines are simply examples of famous formulas. 12. Shakespeare often "stole" content from other people, but he improved what he stole by using rhetorical formulas and figures of speech. Mark insists that he had Thomas North’s translation of Plutarch open while writing Julius Caesar. 13. Write two things that connect, then add a twist for the third thing. The magic comes from the surprise. An example is: "Lies, damned lies, and statistics." Another is: "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." 14. Sometimes, the things that stick will simply surprise you. One of the most famous lines in film history only has three words: "Bond. James Bond." 15. The James Bond-style line is called a Diacope. Other examples are "Burn, baby, burn" and "Zed’s dead, baby, Zed’s dead." If nerding out on beautiful writing is your thing, you will love this episode. By the time you're done listening, you'll have X-ray vision for the English language. I've shared the full interview with Mark Forsyth below. You can also listen on Apple or Spotify, or watch on YouTube. Check the links in the reply tweets.

What does the writing of Katy Perry, Hemingway, and The Bible have in common? Mark Forsyth has the answer. He studied history's greatest writers and noticed how they used the same rhetorical formulas. Here's what you need to know: 1. The formulas are timeless (and still work). 2. Where to begin? Try taking the last word of one sentence and repeating it as the first word in the next. It gives the illusion of logic. Like this one from Yoda: "Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hatred. Hatred leads to suffering." 3. An example from Malcolm X: "Once you change your philosophy, you change your thought pattern. Once you change your thought pattern, you change your attitude. Once you change your attitude, it changes your behavior pattern and then you go on into some action." 4. It's a mystery why, but people love to hear a string of words that begins with the same letter. "Two to Tango" is a heck of a lot more memorable than "Two to Waltz." 5. From his book, Elements of Eloquence: "Adjectives in English absolutely have to be in this order: opinion-size-age-shape-colour-origin-material-purpose Noun." 6. People will tell you to write only what's necessary, but endless repetition can be a way to emphasize something. Katy Perry's repetition of opposites is logically unnecessary, but it works: "'Cause you're hot then you're cold, You're yes then you're no, You're in then you're out, You're up then you're down, You're wrong when it's right, It's black and it's white, We fight, we break up, We kiss, we make up." 7. Wedding vows have the same kind of repetition: "For better or for worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health..." 8. JFK leaned on a rhetorical device called a Chiasmus, where you take the first half of a sentence and say it backward. You see it in sentences like "Mankind must put an end to war—or war will put an end to mankind" and "Ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country." 9. I like the Chiasmus because it's so easy to implement. Here's another example of a Chiasmus, like when Cormac McCarthy wrote: "You forget what you want to remember, and you remember what you want to forget." 10. Language is ruled by the mob. Doesn't matter what the committees think. If everybody uses a word in a certain way, then that's what it means. 11. Most of Shakespeare's famous lines are simply examples of famous formulas. 12. Shakespeare often "stole" content from other people, but he improved what he stole by using rhetorical formulas and figures of speech. Mark insists that he had Thomas North’s translation of Plutarch open while writing Julius Caesar. 13. Write two things that connect, then add a twist for the third thing. The magic comes from the surprise. An example is: "Lies, damned lies, and statistics." Another is: "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." 14. Sometimes, the things that stick will simply surprise you. One of the most famous lines in film history only has three words: "Bond. James Bond." 15. The James Bond-style line is called a Diacope. Other examples are "Burn, baby, burn" and "Zed’s dead, baby, Zed’s dead." If nerding out on beautiful writing is your thing, you will love this episode. By the time you're done listening, you'll have X-ray vision for the English language. I've shared the full interview with Mark Forsyth below. You can also listen on Apple or Spotify, or watch on YouTube. Check the links in the reply tweets.

David Perell

90,497 views • 2 years ago

One of the top stories on X right now Jim Carrey appearing nearly ‘unrecognizable’ with many saying it doesn’t look or sound like him Remember, The CIA Chief Of Disguise confirms they make and use “Full Face Masks” to “Walk around as someone else” They switch people out “I was Chief of Disguise. The office I worked in was like the Q in James Bond. We were the Q for the CIA and the intelligence community. So there were different parts of it, whatever you needed. ‌ If you needed a bug, if you needed secret writing or a microdot or a concealment device or whatever you needed, you had to come to us and we'll put something together for you. Okay. What's the most memorable moment from being in disguise for you? Um, there were a number of them, but the one I mean, one that has to stand out, I went to the White House and I briefed George H. W. Bush, the president, at the time while I was wearing a full face mask. ‌ So we're sitting, like, this close together, and I'm telling him that I'm gonna show him the best disguise that we have. And he's looking for a bag, like, where where is it? I said, well, I'm wearing it, and I'm going to take it off. And I reached to start taking it off, and he said, stop. And he got up and he walked and he looked and he looked at it. ‌ He couldn't he didn't know it was a mask. He wasn't sure what I was wearing. He sat back down. He said, okay. So I took it off. ‌ And I was holding it up in the air so he could see it, my whole head. It had hair and a face and a neck. So you could walk around as someone else? Absolutely. And that would be the disguise. ‌ Absolutely.”

One of the top stories on X right now Jim Carrey appearing nearly ‘unrecognizable’ with many saying it doesn’t look or sound like him Remember, The CIA Chief Of Disguise confirms they make and use “Full Face Masks” to “Walk around as someone else” They switch people out “I was Chief of Disguise. The office I worked in was like the Q in James Bond. We were the Q for the CIA and the intelligence community. So there were different parts of it, whatever you needed. ‌ If you needed a bug, if you needed secret writing or a microdot or a concealment device or whatever you needed, you had to come to us and we'll put something together for you. Okay. What's the most memorable moment from being in disguise for you? Um, there were a number of them, but the one I mean, one that has to stand out, I went to the White House and I briefed George H. W. Bush, the president, at the time while I was wearing a full face mask. ‌ So we're sitting, like, this close together, and I'm telling him that I'm gonna show him the best disguise that we have. And he's looking for a bag, like, where where is it? I said, well, I'm wearing it, and I'm going to take it off. And I reached to start taking it off, and he said, stop. And he got up and he walked and he looked and he looked at it. ‌ He couldn't he didn't know it was a mask. He wasn't sure what I was wearing. He sat back down. He said, okay. So I took it off. ‌ And I was holding it up in the air so he could see it, my whole head. It had hair and a face and a neck. So you could walk around as someone else? Absolutely. And that would be the disguise. ‌ Absolutely.”

Wall Street Apes

230,502 views • 4 months ago

The District Attorney race in Travis County/Greater Austin is among the most important this cycle. Everyone able should vote by March 5th. Watch this video and read the following to understand why – and share with others. I don’t like to get directly involved in politics, and prefer to stick to building social enterprises that bring people together (i.e., KIND Snacks, Builders, SOMOS Foods, Empatico ), but the stakes are so high for Austin that I feel the need to share some facts: Austin is facing a rampant rise in crime. All the data demonstrates it. And all of Jose Garza’s policies point to it. Some specific examples: • Garza let Santos Celso-Flores, who was awaiting trial for participating in the gang rape of 13-year-old girl, out on a $40 bond. While out on bond, Celso-Flores molested two more young girls. • Hilario Adrian’s bond was lowered to just $1 after Garza failed to bring his aggravated assault case to a grand jury in time. Shortly after his release, he brutally attacked an innocent bystander in downtown Austin, stabbing him to death. • Richard Williams brutally raped his ex-girlfriend at knifepoint for two hours while strangling and beating her. Garza cut a deferred adjudication plea deal with Williams, meaning he was released after just 90 days in prison without anything on his record. • Garza released Dedreuain Reese, who had been charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon for pistol-whipping a woman, on a personal recognizance bond. Just weeks after he was released on bond, Reese committed a murder at the same house where he pistol whipped the woman. Friends have been telling me about the rise in crime in Austin. A family who lived downtown had their home burglarized. Another was held up. A friend who leads the Public Safety Commission shared the above examples. I assumed these were isolated cases and initially dismissed the issue. Eventually I did dozens of hours of research. The data is staggering: • 127% increase in the murder rate since Garza took over! • Car jackings more than doubled! • Convictions are down 61%! • Zero Jury Trials by Garza since he took over as DA! How is Garza responsible for this? Some examples: • When he took office, Garza abolished the DA division that sorted out cases. As a result, today there are over seven thousand unindicted felony crimes! Not 7. Not 70. Not 700. Seven THOUSAND pending cases that the DA’s office has failed to process. • In 2021, Garza released a bail reform plan that explicitly included releasing people on bail for just $1. Since then, Travis County has been plagued by crimes committed by people out on bonds. • Over 75 (out of a professional staff of around 95) experienced prosecutors have left the DA's Office since Garza took over in 2021. He has hired inexperienced and untested lawyers to handle the most serious and complicated cases in Travis County. • Here is testimony from a Mother whose children were sexually assaulted: These are not theoretical issues. And the people they affect are the most vulnerable members of our society. • Lynn Isaak survived a brutal attack while running in Travis Heights. She solved her own case through Nextdoor, trusted the DA's Office with the prosecution, and was then shocked when her attacker got probation with no jail time and no electronic monitoring. • Lashonda Lemons was beaten so badly by her partner that she lost her baby. The DA's Office got the case and lowered the charge from aggravated assault to a lesser offense and gave him deferred adjudication - a punishment that allows the offender to walk away without a conviction. This was all done over Lemons' objection. There is hope on the horizon: Jeremy Sylestine is a lifelong Democrat running in the Democratic Primary for Travis District Attorney. He is Native American member of the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas. He went to UT, served as a Public Defender, and then for 15 years as a highly respected member of the DA’s office in Travis County. Meet Jeremy: He is among the highest integrity people you can meet. He is sacrificing a very good job and risking a lot for the sake of Austin and Travis County. Jeremy is compassionate, but he understands the duty to protect the most vulnerable members of our community from violent criminals. It’s quite a contrast: It took me months to understand why, in contrast, Jose Garza would allow a violent criminal who drugged and raped a 13 year old girl to get off without anything on his record. Why would he plea down everything to misdemeanor, including when a violent felon beat his pregnant girlfriend so brutally that she lost her baby? Even the most kindhearted also want justice and public safety. But Garza has a radical ideology that ANY prosecution ever is evil. When he was a public defender, that position was acceptable. But as DA in charge of enforcing the law, he is subverting his duties and violating his oath. Under Garza’s simplistic ideology, everyone is a victim or an oppressor based on their background and position in society rather than based on their actions and behavior. For Garza, the criminals that commit violent crimes are the victims so even if they committed rape or murder they cannot be at fault. It’s the system’s fault. For Garza, the DA’s office he presides over is the oppressor and so he is slowly dismantling it (not just reform it, but dismantling it, which is why he disbanded the division that processes cases, resulting in over seven thousand unindicted criminal felonies thus far). It’s so extreme it’s illogical. But that is what radical extremism does. In terms of financial backing, virtually all support for Jeremy comes from people that live in Travis County. Garza came into power with $1 million from out of state money. The people that put Garza in power do not need to live with the consequences of his actions. Jeremy’s supporters are locals whose families and loved ones live in Travis County. Our only agenda is to protect the community. For us teachers, entrepreneurs and parents it’s uncomfortable to get drawn into politically divisive issues. But the stakes are so high that everyone is stepping in. It’s very unusual for other elected politicians to stand up against an incumbent from their party. The amount of Democratic leaders that I’ve met and have told me how much they dislike Garza but can’t speak up is stunning. And even then, you have icons of the Democratic establishment speaking up: • David Butts and Alfred Stanley are among the most highly respected Austinites and life-long liberals helping Jeremy’s campaign. • Former Austin City Councilwoman Ora Houston, former Travis County Commissioner Karen Huber, as well as the Austin Bar Association Preference Poll, the South Asian Bar Association of Austin, and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas have all endorsed Jeremy. • Even former State Senator Gonzalo Barrientos & Travis County Commissioner Margaret Gomez, fellow Hispanics, are so shocked by Jose Garza’s actions and so impressed with Jeremy’s integrity that they have endorsed Jeremy Sylestine. Extremism seems to be taking over our country. But the proper response to rigidity and dehumanization from one side is not denial of facts and “us vs them” dehumanization from the opposite extreme. Personally, I identify as independent because I find political parties hyperpartisan. I support moderate candidates on both sides. It’s high time for builders to transcend these labels and all join together. It doesn’t matter if you are Democrat or Independent or Republican. You are a human being. You are a citizen. When it comes to public safety, it’s not about politics.Your children should be able to walk downtown without fear for their safety. Your spouse should be able to go for a run in the park without fear of being assaulted or raped. It’s about enforcing the law to protect victims while showing compassion wherever justice guides us to. It’s about all of us being together to BUILD a better community for all. Everyone in Travis County should go out and vote for Jeremy - not just to keep our community safe - but to break the shackles of extremism from either side and show that the people in Austin are ONE and refuse to play divisive games from extremist ideological politicians from either side. Regardless of political affiliation, anyone in #TravisCounty / Greater #AustinTx can go into a voting location, request a #DemocraticPrimary Ballot, and vote for #JeremySylestine in the most consequential election to the community. Where and How to Vote: Vote for @Jeremy4DA during Early Voting today through March 1 or on Election Day March 5.

The District Attorney race in Travis County/Greater Austin is among the most important this cycle. Everyone able should vote by March 5th. Watch this video and read the following to understand why – and share with others. I don’t like to get directly involved in politics, and prefer to stick to building social enterprises that bring people together (i.e., KIND Snacks, Builders, SOMOS Foods, Empatico ), but the stakes are so high for Austin that I feel the need to share some facts: Austin is facing a rampant rise in crime. All the data demonstrates it. And all of Jose Garza’s policies point to it. Some specific examples: • Garza let Santos Celso-Flores, who was awaiting trial for participating in the gang rape of 13-year-old girl, out on a $40 bond. While out on bond, Celso-Flores molested two more young girls. • Hilario Adrian’s bond was lowered to just $1 after Garza failed to bring his aggravated assault case to a grand jury in time. Shortly after his release, he brutally attacked an innocent bystander in downtown Austin, stabbing him to death. • Richard Williams brutally raped his ex-girlfriend at knifepoint for two hours while strangling and beating her. Garza cut a deferred adjudication plea deal with Williams, meaning he was released after just 90 days in prison without anything on his record. • Garza released Dedreuain Reese, who had been charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon for pistol-whipping a woman, on a personal recognizance bond. Just weeks after he was released on bond, Reese committed a murder at the same house where he pistol whipped the woman. Friends have been telling me about the rise in crime in Austin. A family who lived downtown had their home burglarized. Another was held up. A friend who leads the Public Safety Commission shared the above examples. I assumed these were isolated cases and initially dismissed the issue. Eventually I did dozens of hours of research. The data is staggering: • 127% increase in the murder rate since Garza took over! • Car jackings more than doubled! • Convictions are down 61%! • Zero Jury Trials by Garza since he took over as DA! How is Garza responsible for this? Some examples: • When he took office, Garza abolished the DA division that sorted out cases. As a result, today there are over seven thousand unindicted felony crimes! Not 7. Not 70. Not 700. Seven THOUSAND pending cases that the DA’s office has failed to process. • In 2021, Garza released a bail reform plan that explicitly included releasing people on bail for just $1. Since then, Travis County has been plagued by crimes committed by people out on bonds. • Over 75 (out of a professional staff of around 95) experienced prosecutors have left the DA's Office since Garza took over in 2021. He has hired inexperienced and untested lawyers to handle the most serious and complicated cases in Travis County. • Here is testimony from a Mother whose children were sexually assaulted: These are not theoretical issues. And the people they affect are the most vulnerable members of our society. • Lynn Isaak survived a brutal attack while running in Travis Heights. She solved her own case through Nextdoor, trusted the DA's Office with the prosecution, and was then shocked when her attacker got probation with no jail time and no electronic monitoring. • Lashonda Lemons was beaten so badly by her partner that she lost her baby. The DA's Office got the case and lowered the charge from aggravated assault to a lesser offense and gave him deferred adjudication - a punishment that allows the offender to walk away without a conviction. This was all done over Lemons' objection. There is hope on the horizon: Jeremy Sylestine is a lifelong Democrat running in the Democratic Primary for Travis District Attorney. He is Native American member of the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas. He went to UT, served as a Public Defender, and then for 15 years as a highly respected member of the DA’s office in Travis County. Meet Jeremy: He is among the highest integrity people you can meet. He is sacrificing a very good job and risking a lot for the sake of Austin and Travis County. Jeremy is compassionate, but he understands the duty to protect the most vulnerable members of our community from violent criminals. It’s quite a contrast: It took me months to understand why, in contrast, Jose Garza would allow a violent criminal who drugged and raped a 13 year old girl to get off without anything on his record. Why would he plea down everything to misdemeanor, including when a violent felon beat his pregnant girlfriend so brutally that she lost her baby? Even the most kindhearted also want justice and public safety. But Garza has a radical ideology that ANY prosecution ever is evil. When he was a public defender, that position was acceptable. But as DA in charge of enforcing the law, he is subverting his duties and violating his oath. Under Garza’s simplistic ideology, everyone is a victim or an oppressor based on their background and position in society rather than based on their actions and behavior. For Garza, the criminals that commit violent crimes are the victims so even if they committed rape or murder they cannot be at fault. It’s the system’s fault. For Garza, the DA’s office he presides over is the oppressor and so he is slowly dismantling it (not just reform it, but dismantling it, which is why he disbanded the division that processes cases, resulting in over seven thousand unindicted criminal felonies thus far). It’s so extreme it’s illogical. But that is what radical extremism does. In terms of financial backing, virtually all support for Jeremy comes from people that live in Travis County. Garza came into power with $1 million from out of state money. The people that put Garza in power do not need to live with the consequences of his actions. Jeremy’s supporters are locals whose families and loved ones live in Travis County. Our only agenda is to protect the community. For us teachers, entrepreneurs and parents it’s uncomfortable to get drawn into politically divisive issues. But the stakes are so high that everyone is stepping in. It’s very unusual for other elected politicians to stand up against an incumbent from their party. The amount of Democratic leaders that I’ve met and have told me how much they dislike Garza but can’t speak up is stunning. And even then, you have icons of the Democratic establishment speaking up: • David Butts and Alfred Stanley are among the most highly respected Austinites and life-long liberals helping Jeremy’s campaign. • Former Austin City Councilwoman Ora Houston, former Travis County Commissioner Karen Huber, as well as the Austin Bar Association Preference Poll, the South Asian Bar Association of Austin, and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas have all endorsed Jeremy. • Even former State Senator Gonzalo Barrientos & Travis County Commissioner Margaret Gomez, fellow Hispanics, are so shocked by Jose Garza’s actions and so impressed with Jeremy’s integrity that they have endorsed Jeremy Sylestine. Extremism seems to be taking over our country. But the proper response to rigidity and dehumanization from one side is not denial of facts and “us vs them” dehumanization from the opposite extreme. Personally, I identify as independent because I find political parties hyperpartisan. I support moderate candidates on both sides. It’s high time for builders to transcend these labels and all join together. It doesn’t matter if you are Democrat or Independent or Republican. You are a human being. You are a citizen. When it comes to public safety, it’s not about politics.Your children should be able to walk downtown without fear for their safety. Your spouse should be able to go for a run in the park without fear of being assaulted or raped. It’s about enforcing the law to protect victims while showing compassion wherever justice guides us to. It’s about all of us being together to BUILD a better community for all. Everyone in Travis County should go out and vote for Jeremy - not just to keep our community safe - but to break the shackles of extremism from either side and show that the people in Austin are ONE and refuse to play divisive games from extremist ideological politicians from either side. Regardless of political affiliation, anyone in #TravisCounty / Greater #AustinTx can go into a voting location, request a #DemocraticPrimary Ballot, and vote for #JeremySylestine in the most consequential election to the community. Where and How to Vote: Vote for @Jeremy4DA during Early Voting today through March 1 or on Election Day March 5.

Daniel Lubetzky

7,793,038 views • 2 years ago

Vanguard founder Jack Bogle explains his nuanced view on index funds vs. ETFs: Jack Bogle, the man who created the index fund, clarifies that his concerns aren't with broad index investing itself. His issue is with how ETFs tempt investors to behave badly and how the industry has weaponized the ETF structure for gimmicks. He starts by noting just how dominant index funds have become: “The dominance of index funds, which accounts for 28% of the market, is partly due to ETFs representing more than half of that share." But here's where he draws the line: “I have nothing against broad ETFs per se, but rather the narrow, managed ones and the way people misuse the broad versions." On broad ETFs vs. traditional index funds: they're the same thing Bogle makes clear that structurally, there's no meaningful difference between a Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and what he calls a "TIFF" (Traditional Index Fund), a term he coined to distinguish them: "They both own exactly the same portfolio and are part of the same portfolio, meaning their returns will be identical. Both types cost around five or six basis points at the Admiral class level." He explains Vanguard's pricing: Below roughly $10,000 invested, you'll pay 10 to 12 basis points, but once you cross the Admiral threshold, "the funds are identical." So what's the real problem with ETFs? Behavior. The ability to trade intraday creates temptation: "My slight bias against ETFs stems from the temptation to trade in the middle of the day when trouble arises." He points out how pointless this reactive trading is: "Getting out in the middle of the day is often a reaction to market volatility, such as the market dropping 300 points and then recovering in the second half of the day. This 'bouncing around' is meaningless in the long run." What he actually endorses: Bogle is clear that broad market index funds, whether structured as ETFs or traditional funds, all serve investors well: "Broad market index funds, including the S&P 500, total bond market, total US stock market, international, and even emerging market funds, are all acceptable 'total market funds'." Where the industry lost the plot: His sharpest criticism is reserved for what the ETF industry has become: "The industry has become a marketing business focused on 'crazy' or 'stupid' ideas that no one else has thought of." He offers specific examples: An emerging cancer ETF" he once criticized in the Wall Street Journal, today's "cloud computing" ETFs, and leveraged products offering 100%, 200%, or even 300% exposure, letting investors bet on the market going up or down by three times. His verdict on these: "The sense behind these types of investments is beyond my comprehension."

Vanguard founder Jack Bogle explains his nuanced view on index funds vs. ETFs: Jack Bogle, the man who created the index fund, clarifies that his concerns aren't with broad index investing itself. His issue is with how ETFs tempt investors to behave badly and how the industry has weaponized the ETF structure for gimmicks. He starts by noting just how dominant index funds have become: “The dominance of index funds, which accounts for 28% of the market, is partly due to ETFs representing more than half of that share." But here's where he draws the line: “I have nothing against broad ETFs per se, but rather the narrow, managed ones and the way people misuse the broad versions." On broad ETFs vs. traditional index funds: they're the same thing Bogle makes clear that structurally, there's no meaningful difference between a Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and what he calls a "TIFF" (Traditional Index Fund), a term he coined to distinguish them: "They both own exactly the same portfolio and are part of the same portfolio, meaning their returns will be identical. Both types cost around five or six basis points at the Admiral class level." He explains Vanguard's pricing: Below roughly $10,000 invested, you'll pay 10 to 12 basis points, but once you cross the Admiral threshold, "the funds are identical." So what's the real problem with ETFs? Behavior. The ability to trade intraday creates temptation: "My slight bias against ETFs stems from the temptation to trade in the middle of the day when trouble arises." He points out how pointless this reactive trading is: "Getting out in the middle of the day is often a reaction to market volatility, such as the market dropping 300 points and then recovering in the second half of the day. This 'bouncing around' is meaningless in the long run." What he actually endorses: Bogle is clear that broad market index funds, whether structured as ETFs or traditional funds, all serve investors well: "Broad market index funds, including the S&P 500, total bond market, total US stock market, international, and even emerging market funds, are all acceptable 'total market funds'." Where the industry lost the plot: His sharpest criticism is reserved for what the ETF industry has become: "The industry has become a marketing business focused on 'crazy' or 'stupid' ideas that no one else has thought of." He offers specific examples: An emerging cancer ETF" he once criticized in the Wall Street Journal, today's "cloud computing" ETFs, and leveraged products offering 100%, 200%, or even 300% exposure, letting investors bet on the market going up or down by three times. His verdict on these: "The sense behind these types of investments is beyond my comprehension."

Black Edge

13,757 views • 1 month ago

Pro tip: If your neighbor's kids are blowing soap bubbles, maybe don't grab a can of industrial bear mace to handle it. A mother in Ocala Florida, was in her driveway with her two young daughters (ages 3 and 6) who were playing with standard soap bubble toys. An elderly neighbor became enraged by the children playing near the property line. The neighbor walked to the edge of the fence and unleashed a massive cloud of bear mace (a heavy-duty chemical deterrent) over the fence directly at the mother and her children. The mother reported that while the neighbor was spraying the chemical, they were actively shouting racial slurs at the family. She noted that this was part of an ongoing pattern of targeted harassment they had faced since moving into the home. When sheriff's deputies arrived, they found a distinct orange and brown liquid residue covering the fence and the grass on the victim's side of the property. The airborne chemical was so potent that it caused the responding officers' noses and throats to burn just by standing near the area. When questioned, the neighbor admitted to spraying the mace. The defense given to deputies was that the two young kids were running up and down the fence line and yelling, which prompted the reaction. The neighbor claimed the chemical didn't actually hit them, though that claim was directly contradicted by the physical evidence on the fence and the family's physical symptoms. The neighbor was arrested on the spot. Because a background check revealed prior arrests for aggravated assault and stalking, law enforcement proceeded with standard booking procedures despite the suspect's advanced age. The neighbor was booked into the county jail and officially charged with three counts of battery (one felony count and two misdemeanor counts for the actions against the children). She was released from custody the following day after posting bond. Local residents were divided, with some claiming both households had been feuding and provoking each other for a long time. Conversely, the mother expressed deep frustration that the state didn't upgrade the charges to a hate crime or child abuse. Feeling entirely unsafe living next door to the neighbor after the incident, the mother stated she was seeking a restraining order and planning to completely relocate her children to a new neighborhood.

Pro tip: If your neighbor's kids are blowing soap bubbles, maybe don't grab a can of industrial bear mace to handle it. A mother in Ocala Florida, was in her driveway with her two young daughters (ages 3 and 6) who were playing with standard soap bubble toys. An elderly neighbor became enraged by the children playing near the property line. The neighbor walked to the edge of the fence and unleashed a massive cloud of bear mace (a heavy-duty chemical deterrent) over the fence directly at the mother and her children. The mother reported that while the neighbor was spraying the chemical, they were actively shouting racial slurs at the family. She noted that this was part of an ongoing pattern of targeted harassment they had faced since moving into the home. When sheriff's deputies arrived, they found a distinct orange and brown liquid residue covering the fence and the grass on the victim's side of the property. The airborne chemical was so potent that it caused the responding officers' noses and throats to burn just by standing near the area. When questioned, the neighbor admitted to spraying the mace. The defense given to deputies was that the two young kids were running up and down the fence line and yelling, which prompted the reaction. The neighbor claimed the chemical didn't actually hit them, though that claim was directly contradicted by the physical evidence on the fence and the family's physical symptoms. The neighbor was arrested on the spot. Because a background check revealed prior arrests for aggravated assault and stalking, law enforcement proceeded with standard booking procedures despite the suspect's advanced age. The neighbor was booked into the county jail and officially charged with three counts of battery (one felony count and two misdemeanor counts for the actions against the children). She was released from custody the following day after posting bond. Local residents were divided, with some claiming both households had been feuding and provoking each other for a long time. Conversely, the mother expressed deep frustration that the state didn't upgrade the charges to a hate crime or child abuse. Feeling entirely unsafe living next door to the neighbor after the incident, the mother stated she was seeking a restraining order and planning to completely relocate her children to a new neighborhood.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

146,113 views • 1 month ago

🚨🇺🇸 EXCLUSIVE w/ REP. JIM JORDAN: “FREE SPEECH IS UNDER ATTACK” If you don’t believe Congressman Jim Jordan, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, that our freedom is in serious jeopardy, then you’re living under a rock. Forget the censorship of Biden’s laptop, Covid, the Twitter Files, or even the banning of the U.S President Here’s some recent examples in the EU: * Comedian Graham Linehan was arrested this week for making a joke about a trans-man on X. * Bernadette Spofforth was arrested for falsely identified the Southport stabbing suspect as "Ali Al-Shakati," with the comment, “If this is true, then all hell is about to break loose”, then deleting her tweet an hour later. * Lucy Connolly was jailed for 3 years after tweeting "Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f**** hotels full of the bastards for all I care... If that makes me racist, so be it,” and deleting after 3.5 hours * And craziest of all, Patryk Jaki, a Memeber of the European Parliament, is facing jail for LIKING a video on X showing migrant violence. Just liking! Rep Jim Jordan is leading a U.S delegation focused on fighting against this authoritarian censorship. In this rare long form interview, Rep Jordan not only talks about free speech, but about the Epstein files, the MAGA split between ‘Israel First’ and ‘America First’, the raid on John Bolton, America’s ballooning debt, and the crackdown on crime by the National Guard. 01:45 – “In the UK last year: 12,183 arrests for offensive posts online.” 05:11 – A comedian was arrested for posting a photo of a protest with the caption: “A photo you can smell.” 07:06 – “Everything they told us about COVID was false – and they censored anyone who said otherwise.” 07:58 – Biden WH to Twitter: “Take down this tweet from RFK Jr. ASAP.” 09:46 – Meta tells Congress: “We were pressured to censor. We did. We’re sorry.” 11:18 – EU threatens Elon over airing an interview with Trump. 12:35 – “I will not hesitate to make full use of our toolbox” – EU letter to Musk. 14:46 – The law didn’t change. The threats just got quieter. 17:21 – Jordan exposes GARM, a global ad cartel blacklisting conservative platforms. 18:38 – Biden’s “Disinformation Governance Board” = a real-life Ministry of Truth. 19:45 – “The most important right is the right to talk. If we lose that, we lose everything.” 21:45 – On Israel: “We must be unwavering. It’s a miracle state. There’s a special bond.” 25:28 – FBI Director and AG to testify on Epstein & Schiff leaks in coming weeks. 28:52 – “We can’t indict, but we can expose. And we are.” 31:41 – “The only thing we get wrong at the start? It’s always worse than we thought.” 36:46 – What keeps Jordan up at night: “Losing the First Amendment.” 39:15 – On U.S. debt: “You need growth. You need to stay the reserve currency. And you need to stop the spending.” 45:50 – Jordan says Comey, Schiff, Clapper, and Bolton all mishandled classified info – while accusing Trump of doing the same. 49:39 – Crime in D.C.? “An 80% drop in carjackings after Trump sent in the Guard.” 52:36 – On China: “I don’t think totalitarianism beats freedom. Not in the long run.”

🚨🇺🇸 EXCLUSIVE w/ REP. JIM JORDAN: “FREE SPEECH IS UNDER ATTACK” If you don’t believe Congressman Jim Jordan, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, that our freedom is in serious jeopardy, then you’re living under a rock. Forget the censorship of Biden’s laptop, Covid, the Twitter Files, or even the banning of the U.S President Here’s some recent examples in the EU: * Comedian Graham Linehan was arrested this week for making a joke about a trans-man on X. * Bernadette Spofforth was arrested for falsely identified the Southport stabbing suspect as "Ali Al-Shakati," with the comment, “If this is true, then all hell is about to break loose”, then deleting her tweet an hour later. * Lucy Connolly was jailed for 3 years after tweeting "Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f**** hotels full of the bastards for all I care... If that makes me racist, so be it,” and deleting after 3.5 hours * And craziest of all, Patryk Jaki, a Memeber of the European Parliament, is facing jail for LIKING a video on X showing migrant violence. Just liking! Rep Jim Jordan is leading a U.S delegation focused on fighting against this authoritarian censorship. In this rare long form interview, Rep Jordan not only talks about free speech, but about the Epstein files, the MAGA split between ‘Israel First’ and ‘America First’, the raid on John Bolton, America’s ballooning debt, and the crackdown on crime by the National Guard. 01:45 – “In the UK last year: 12,183 arrests for offensive posts online.” 05:11 – A comedian was arrested for posting a photo of a protest with the caption: “A photo you can smell.” 07:06 – “Everything they told us about COVID was false – and they censored anyone who said otherwise.” 07:58 – Biden WH to Twitter: “Take down this tweet from RFK Jr. ASAP.” 09:46 – Meta tells Congress: “We were pressured to censor. We did. We’re sorry.” 11:18 – EU threatens Elon over airing an interview with Trump. 12:35 – “I will not hesitate to make full use of our toolbox” – EU letter to Musk. 14:46 – The law didn’t change. The threats just got quieter. 17:21 – Jordan exposes GARM, a global ad cartel blacklisting conservative platforms. 18:38 – Biden’s “Disinformation Governance Board” = a real-life Ministry of Truth. 19:45 – “The most important right is the right to talk. If we lose that, we lose everything.” 21:45 – On Israel: “We must be unwavering. It’s a miracle state. There’s a special bond.” 25:28 – FBI Director and AG to testify on Epstein & Schiff leaks in coming weeks. 28:52 – “We can’t indict, but we can expose. And we are.” 31:41 – “The only thing we get wrong at the start? It’s always worse than we thought.” 36:46 – What keeps Jordan up at night: “Losing the First Amendment.” 39:15 – On U.S. debt: “You need growth. You need to stay the reserve currency. And you need to stop the spending.” 45:50 – Jordan says Comey, Schiff, Clapper, and Bolton all mishandled classified info – while accusing Trump of doing the same. 49:39 – Crime in D.C.? “An 80% drop in carjackings after Trump sent in the Guard.” 52:36 – On China: “I don’t think totalitarianism beats freedom. Not in the long run.”

Mario Nawfal

2,126,762 views • 10 months ago

Ep. 14 Free the Money | Billions in Physical Gold: Who’s Standing for Delivery? | Andy Schectman In this episode, I’m joined by Andy Schectman, founder and CEO of Miles Franklin Precious Metals to unpack what he believes is the single most important story in markets right now: not the rising price of gold and silver, but who is taking physical delivery. Month after month, billions of dollars worth of gold are being removed from the COMEX, yet mainstream media avoids the obvious question: who is standing for delivery? Andy argues this shift signals something far bigger happening beneath the surface of the financial system. From there, the conversation expands into a stark warning: if the U.S. doesn’t bring back manufacturing, future generations are in serious trouble. With exploding debt, declining industrial output, and AI poised to disrupt millions of jobs, Andy suggests a structural reset may be underway. He speaks of the possibility of a “soft default” on U.S. reserve currency status before the end of the Trump administration as part of a broader effort to bring manufacturing back to America and shift from being the world’s largest debtor nation toward becoming a creditor nation again. The episode also explores why governments are accumulating gold, citing outperformance, neutrality, lack of counterparty risk, and protection from sanctions and examines how stablecoin legislation could create synthetic Treasury demand while gold potentially anchors the back end of the bond market. We close by bridging precious metals and crypto, emphasizing a shared goal: preserving wealth, privacy, and financial freedom in a rapidly shifting global system. Sign up for ITrustCapital with this link for $100 funding bonus. See why people are opening a tax-advantaged Crypto, Gold & Silver IRA for their future: 0:00 Andy’s origin story “buy every 2 weeks,” and the power of compounding 5:20 The big tell: record COMEX deliveries — who’s really standing for physical (billions of dollars per month) 9:14 Strategic stockpile + Exchange Stabilization Fund — debt math and a trust-based system 12:35 Sanctions, regime change, and the trust problem — why gold wins (neutral, no counterparty risk) 16:12 Cato data: biggest federal workforce drawdown on record, yet spending still rises 18:06 Retail all-in on stocks while “smart money” rotates — deliveries signal the other side of the trade 18:39 Triffin’s Dilemma — reshoring manufacturing and a “soft default” on reserve-currency status 23:23 GENIUS + CLARITY Acts — stablecoins as synthetic Treasury demand + the gold feedback loop 28:03 Measuring stick reset: price in dollars vs price in gold — Dow/house examples expose dollar dilution 32:43 Judy Shelton: peg the back end of bonds to gold (zero-coupon, long-dated) 38:03 Bloomberg/Russia headline — paper smash, repositioning, and the silver supply math 48:27 Crypto— why privacy matters 54:42 Spending privately: using Zebec so you don’t have to “off-ramp” to banks 56:04 Digital ID— the surveillance-state conversation 57:42 United front: gold/silver + crypto privacy people aligning to protect freedom

Ep. 14 Free the Money | Billions in Physical Gold: Who’s Standing for Delivery? | Andy Schectman In this episode, I’m joined by Andy Schectman, founder and CEO of Miles Franklin Precious Metals to unpack what he believes is the single most important story in markets right now: not the rising price of gold and silver, but who is taking physical delivery. Month after month, billions of dollars worth of gold are being removed from the COMEX, yet mainstream media avoids the obvious question: who is standing for delivery? Andy argues this shift signals something far bigger happening beneath the surface of the financial system. From there, the conversation expands into a stark warning: if the U.S. doesn’t bring back manufacturing, future generations are in serious trouble. With exploding debt, declining industrial output, and AI poised to disrupt millions of jobs, Andy suggests a structural reset may be underway. He speaks of the possibility of a “soft default” on U.S. reserve currency status before the end of the Trump administration as part of a broader effort to bring manufacturing back to America and shift from being the world’s largest debtor nation toward becoming a creditor nation again. The episode also explores why governments are accumulating gold, citing outperformance, neutrality, lack of counterparty risk, and protection from sanctions and examines how stablecoin legislation could create synthetic Treasury demand while gold potentially anchors the back end of the bond market. We close by bridging precious metals and crypto, emphasizing a shared goal: preserving wealth, privacy, and financial freedom in a rapidly shifting global system. Sign up for ITrustCapital with this link for $100 funding bonus. See why people are opening a tax-advantaged Crypto, Gold & Silver IRA for their future: 0:00 Andy’s origin story “buy every 2 weeks,” and the power of compounding 5:20 The big tell: record COMEX deliveries — who’s really standing for physical (billions of dollars per month) 9:14 Strategic stockpile + Exchange Stabilization Fund — debt math and a trust-based system 12:35 Sanctions, regime change, and the trust problem — why gold wins (neutral, no counterparty risk) 16:12 Cato data: biggest federal workforce drawdown on record, yet spending still rises 18:06 Retail all-in on stocks while “smart money” rotates — deliveries signal the other side of the trade 18:39 Triffin’s Dilemma — reshoring manufacturing and a “soft default” on reserve-currency status 23:23 GENIUS + CLARITY Acts — stablecoins as synthetic Treasury demand + the gold feedback loop 28:03 Measuring stick reset: price in dollars vs price in gold — Dow/house examples expose dollar dilution 32:43 Judy Shelton: peg the back end of bonds to gold (zero-coupon, long-dated) 38:03 Bloomberg/Russia headline — paper smash, repositioning, and the silver supply math 48:27 Crypto— why privacy matters 54:42 Spending privately: using Zebec so you don’t have to “off-ramp” to banks 56:04 Digital ID— the surveillance-state conversation 57:42 United front: gold/silver + crypto privacy people aligning to protect freedom

Bri Teresi

30,248 views • 4 months ago

🚨BREAKING: DHS is caught lying again… this time to justify shooting a man and then trying to railroad him into prison while cutting him off from his lawyer. A federal judge has just thrown out the entire case against Carlitos Ricardo Parias, a TikTok journalist who was shot by ICE during an enforcement operation in South L.A., because the government violated his constitutional rights so severely that the damage could not be undone. From the start, DHS pushed a familiar narrative: that Parias “weaponized” his vehicle and tried to ram agents, forcing them to open fire. That story was used to justify shooting him, charging him with assault on federal officers, and portraying him as a violent threat. But newly released body camera footage…. footage the government delayed turning over… tells a very different story. The video shows an ICE officer smashing Parias’ car window with one hand while holding a gun in the other. Parias’ hands are up. He repeatedly asks why he’s being detained. His car is boxed in. It is not moving. Despite this, an officer fires his weapon, striking Parias in the arm. The officer’s own reaction on camera is shock… not fear, not “defensive action,” but surprise at having fired the shot. That alone should have triggered accountability. Instead, DHS doubled down. They charged Parias the same day he was shot. They claimed he tried to ram agents. They claimed debris flying from spinning tires justified lethal force. They accused him of previously escaping custody, even though video appears to show agents letting him go during an earlier incident. They continued to paint him as dangerous while withholding critical evidence from his defense. Then came the cover-up tactics. After a judge ordered Parias released on bond, the government immediately transferred him into ICE custody anyway, moving him to the Adelanto ICE Processing Center… hours away from his attorneys… just weeks before trial. According to the court, this is where the constitutional violations truly began. By placing him in immigration detention, the government effectively blocked his access to legal counsel during the most critical period of his defense, jeopardizing his Sixth Amendment right to a fair and speedy trial. For nearly a month before trial, his lawyers were unable to meet with him. Legal visits couldn’t be scheduled. Video conferences were obstructed. Discovery was delayed, then drip-fed long past court deadlines. The body cam footage that contradicted DHS’s public narrative wasn’t produced on time. The judge made clear this wasn’t an accident… it was prejudice caused by government action. In a 28-page ruling, the judge dismissed the indictment with prejudice, meaning prosecutors can never refile the charges. The court found that the government’s conduct caused real and irreparable harm to Parias’ defense, and that no lesser remedy could fix it. This case exposes a pattern, not an anomaly. Shoot first, lie publicly to justify it, withhold evidence, isolate the victim in ICE detention, deny access to counsel, miss deadlines, and hope the system doesn’t catch up before the damage is done. When the narrative collapses under video evidence and judicial scrutiny, the response isn’t accountability… it’s silence. Even now, despite the charges being dismissed, Parias remains in ICE detention as his immigration case continues. DHS didn’t just violate one man’s rights. They tested how far they could go… how many lies they could tell, how much evidence they could bury, how completely they could isolate someone from legal help…. before the truth forced its way into the open. The only reason their story collapsed is because cameras were on. This is why DHS and ICE hate being filmed. Without cameras, their version becomes the only record. Violence becomes policy, lies become “facts,” and constitutional rights disappear quietly.

🚨BREAKING: DHS is caught lying again… this time to justify shooting a man and then trying to railroad him into prison while cutting him off from his lawyer. A federal judge has just thrown out the entire case against Carlitos Ricardo Parias, a TikTok journalist who was shot by ICE during an enforcement operation in South L.A., because the government violated his constitutional rights so severely that the damage could not be undone. From the start, DHS pushed a familiar narrative: that Parias “weaponized” his vehicle and tried to ram agents, forcing them to open fire. That story was used to justify shooting him, charging him with assault on federal officers, and portraying him as a violent threat. But newly released body camera footage…. footage the government delayed turning over… tells a very different story. The video shows an ICE officer smashing Parias’ car window with one hand while holding a gun in the other. Parias’ hands are up. He repeatedly asks why he’s being detained. His car is boxed in. It is not moving. Despite this, an officer fires his weapon, striking Parias in the arm. The officer’s own reaction on camera is shock… not fear, not “defensive action,” but surprise at having fired the shot. That alone should have triggered accountability. Instead, DHS doubled down. They charged Parias the same day he was shot. They claimed he tried to ram agents. They claimed debris flying from spinning tires justified lethal force. They accused him of previously escaping custody, even though video appears to show agents letting him go during an earlier incident. They continued to paint him as dangerous while withholding critical evidence from his defense. Then came the cover-up tactics. After a judge ordered Parias released on bond, the government immediately transferred him into ICE custody anyway, moving him to the Adelanto ICE Processing Center… hours away from his attorneys… just weeks before trial. According to the court, this is where the constitutional violations truly began. By placing him in immigration detention, the government effectively blocked his access to legal counsel during the most critical period of his defense, jeopardizing his Sixth Amendment right to a fair and speedy trial. For nearly a month before trial, his lawyers were unable to meet with him. Legal visits couldn’t be scheduled. Video conferences were obstructed. Discovery was delayed, then drip-fed long past court deadlines. The body cam footage that contradicted DHS’s public narrative wasn’t produced on time. The judge made clear this wasn’t an accident… it was prejudice caused by government action. In a 28-page ruling, the judge dismissed the indictment with prejudice, meaning prosecutors can never refile the charges. The court found that the government’s conduct caused real and irreparable harm to Parias’ defense, and that no lesser remedy could fix it. This case exposes a pattern, not an anomaly. Shoot first, lie publicly to justify it, withhold evidence, isolate the victim in ICE detention, deny access to counsel, miss deadlines, and hope the system doesn’t catch up before the damage is done. When the narrative collapses under video evidence and judicial scrutiny, the response isn’t accountability… it’s silence. Even now, despite the charges being dismissed, Parias remains in ICE detention as his immigration case continues. DHS didn’t just violate one man’s rights. They tested how far they could go… how many lies they could tell, how much evidence they could bury, how completely they could isolate someone from legal help…. before the truth forced its way into the open. The only reason their story collapsed is because cameras were on. This is why DHS and ICE hate being filmed. Without cameras, their version becomes the only record. Violence becomes policy, lies become “facts,” and constitutional rights disappear quietly.

Jesus Freakin Congress

55,535 views • 6 months ago