正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Vitalik Buterin: Why Consortium Blockchains Have Almost Completely Failed Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin vitalik.eth declared the original vision of consortium blockchains a failure in a July 20, 2024 Arbitrum video. He noted that these private chains inherit the drawbacks of both centralized and decentralized systems, resulting in cartel-like structures...

WuBlockchain's profile picture

Wu Blockchain

556,490 subscribers

28,046 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Vitalik Buterin: L2s afraid to fully decentralize should just be centralized servers On July 3, 2025, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin vitalik.eth stated in an EthCC speech video that many Layer 2 projects claiming to build on-chain retain instant backdoors or fall short of their claimed decentralization stages. He believes that from a practical standpoint, this architecture is not much better than a traditional centralized server. Vitalik Buterin stated that if developers are afraid to make their projects truly decentralized, the most straightforward approach is to simply build a centralized server.
1:26

Vitalik Buterin: L2s afraid to fully decentralize should just be centralized servers On July 3, 2025, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin vitalik.eth stated in an EthCC speech video that many Layer 2 projects claiming to build on-chain retain instant backdoors or fall short of their claimed decentralization stages. He believes that from a practical standpoint, this architecture is not much better than a traditional centralized server. Vitalik Buterin stated that if developers are afraid to make their projects truly decentralized, the most straightforward approach is to simply build a centralized server.

Wu Blockchain

24,699 次观看 • 3 个月前

Vitalik: If the Developers Disappear, Can Your App Still Run? On January 27, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin introduced the concept of the "Walkaway Test" at the ETH ChiangMai togETHer Tuesday event, a criterion for assessing whether decentralized applications truly resist reliance on centralized dependencies. Ideally, even if developers or servers were to disappear suddenly, users should still be able to continue using the application. Vitalik noted that while blockchains themselves are trust-minimized, many applications still follow Web2 architectures that rely on centralized logins and servers, weakening practical decentralization and highlighting a key area for improvement in today’s decentralized applications. Source:
2:01

Vitalik: If the Developers Disappear, Can Your App Still Run? On January 27, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin introduced the concept of the "Walkaway Test" at the ETH ChiangMai togETHer Tuesday event, a criterion for assessing whether decentralized applications truly resist reliance on centralized dependencies. Ideally, even if developers or servers were to disappear suddenly, users should still be able to continue using the application. Vitalik noted that while blockchains themselves are trust-minimized, many applications still follow Web2 architectures that rely on centralized logins and servers, weakening practical decentralization and highlighting a key area for improvement in today’s decentralized applications. Source:

Wu Blockchain

20,626 次观看 • 6 个月前

Vitalik Buterin: The crypto ecosystem must not go down the path of OpenAI（ARCHIVE FOOTAGE ） On July 3, 2025, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated in an EthCC speech video that the crypto industry must not repeat the mistakes of OpenAI, which first gave up openness for safety, and then sacrificed safety for rapid growth. He believes that many projects in Web1, Web2, and the crypto space eventually move towards corporatization because they become driven by financial incentives and social connections once they form entities. Vitalik Buterin stated that the ecosystem should establish more diverse funding and reward models, ensuring that core principles like open source, privacy, and censorship resistance are strictly taken into account alongside commercial success.
1:30

Vitalik Buterin: The crypto ecosystem must not go down the path of OpenAI（ARCHIVE FOOTAGE ） On July 3, 2025, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated in an EthCC speech video that the crypto industry must not repeat the mistakes of OpenAI, which first gave up openness for safety, and then sacrificed safety for rapid growth. He believes that many projects in Web1, Web2, and the crypto space eventually move towards corporatization because they become driven by financial incentives and social connections once they form entities. Vitalik Buterin stated that the ecosystem should establish more diverse funding and reward models, ensuring that core principles like open source, privacy, and censorship resistance are strictly taken into account alongside commercial success.

Wu Blockchain

23,427 次观看 • 3 个月前

Vitalik Buterin on why consortium blockchains have mostly failed “The original vision of consortium blockchains — the idea that you have 5 banks or major companies that come together and create their own chain — has been mostly a failure. I think the reason why is it ends up inheriting most of the disadvantages of centralization and most of the disadvantages of decentralization at the same time.” “The first five banks join, and they all feel like ‘Yay, we’re building a system together. We can all be part of it.’ But then once bank #6 and bank #7 and bank #29 come in, they’re joining a system where there’s already an established power structure, established participants, and basically to them it still feels like they’re joining some kind of centralized thing that’s controlled by a cartel.” “You don’t actually gain the benefits of true openness that people are looking for. You don’t have Etherscan. You don’t have a connection to an open, public network. At the same time, if you build on one of those systems, you have to figure out how to program distributed systems; you lose privacy — you might think you still have some, but the reality is you’re putting your data on a network where the only people that get to see it are you and all your closest competitors. From a privacy perspective, it actually doesn’t make much sense.” “The compromise between centralization and decentralization that actually makes a lot more sense is: you have an application and today that application is a server. You can keep your server, but instead, we’re going to add scaffolding on top to give users extra security guarantees. You put Merkle roots on chain. You put proofs on chain. And you give your users assurance that whatever is happening inside of your system is actually following the rules. So you have high scale, high performance, and you optimize for a minimal delta for existing centralized infrastructure deployment. Keep your existing infrastructure the way it is, and you just add a side car that makes the roots and the proofs.” Source: Arbitrum
2:42

Vitalik Buterin on why consortium blockchains have mostly failed “The original vision of consortium blockchains — the idea that you have 5 banks or major companies that come together and create their own chain — has been mostly a failure. I think the reason why is it ends up inheriting most of the disadvantages of centralization and most of the disadvantages of decentralization at the same time.” “The first five banks join, and they all feel like ‘Yay, we’re building a system together. We can all be part of it.’ But then once bank #6 and bank #7 and bank #29 come in, they’re joining a system where there’s already an established power structure, established participants, and basically to them it still feels like they’re joining some kind of centralized thing that’s controlled by a cartel.” “You don’t actually gain the benefits of true openness that people are looking for. You don’t have Etherscan. You don’t have a connection to an open, public network. At the same time, if you build on one of those systems, you have to figure out how to program distributed systems; you lose privacy — you might think you still have some, but the reality is you’re putting your data on a network where the only people that get to see it are you and all your closest competitors. From a privacy perspective, it actually doesn’t make much sense.” “The compromise between centralization and decentralization that actually makes a lot more sense is: you have an application and today that application is a server. You can keep your server, but instead, we’re going to add scaffolding on top to give users extra security guarantees. You put Merkle roots on chain. You put proofs on chain. And you give your users assurance that whatever is happening inside of your system is actually following the rules. So you have high scale, high performance, and you optimize for a minimal delta for existing centralized infrastructure deployment. Keep your existing infrastructure the way it is, and you just add a side car that makes the roots and the proofs.” Source: Arbitrum

Etherealize

131,518 次观看 • 3 个月前

Vitalik: Trump Becoming the "Coin King" Is a Complete Failure Case failure On February 3, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin said in a conversation with P2P Foundation founder Michel Bauwens at the 2026 Ethereum Chiang Mai Future Summit that 2025 was a very difficult year. Vitalik noted that the Trump meme coin, which was theoretically the "King of Coins," ultimately crashed 95%, becoming a complete failure. This has led the industry to rethink what role cryptocurrency plays in the world. Facing the rise of AI, SpaceX's Starship, and biotechnology, Vitalik believes that if crypto relies only on being cool high tech, it will face strong competition and must instead represent social and even political issues. He emphasized that the industry should explore a model of modernity that does not concentrate power in a few tech hubs amid growing distrust. Source：ETHChiangmai
2:00

Vitalik: Trump Becoming the "Coin King" Is a Complete Failure Case failure On February 3, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin said in a conversation with P2P Foundation founder Michel Bauwens at the 2026 Ethereum Chiang Mai Future Summit that 2025 was a very difficult year. Vitalik noted that the Trump meme coin, which was theoretically the "King of Coins," ultimately crashed 95%, becoming a complete failure. This has led the industry to rethink what role cryptocurrency plays in the world. Facing the rise of AI, SpaceX's Starship, and biotechnology, Vitalik believes that if crypto relies only on being cool high tech, it will face strong competition and must instead represent social and even political issues. He emphasized that the industry should explore a model of modernity that does not concentrate power in a few tech hubs amid growing distrust. Source：ETHChiangmai

Wu Blockchain

31,904 次观看 • 6 个月前

Vitalik Signals "ZK Payments" as Next Standard for the Agent Era Vitalik Buterin vitalik.eth stated that at the protocol level for native agent standards, the next step for payments is likely ZK Payments. He believes that in AI scenarios, persistent pseudonymous identities will eventually lose all privacy. The team is developing a ZK API to isolate each request, which protects privacy without requiring an on-chain transaction for every single action, and can be combined with security deposits to prevent abuse.
1:27

Vitalik Signals "ZK Payments" as Next Standard for the Agent Era Vitalik Buterin vitalik.eth stated that at the protocol level for native agent standards, the next step for payments is likely ZK Payments. He believes that in AI scenarios, persistent pseudonymous identities will eventually lose all privacy. The team is developing a ZK API to isolate each request, which protects privacy without requiring an on-chain transaction for every single action, and can be combined with security deposits to prevent abuse.

Wu Blockchain

54,212 次观看 • 3 个月前

#Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin explains why Ethereum is an unregistered security and therefore illegal in the United States. SEC and Gary Gensler, are you paying attention? Vitalik explains here on March 3, 2014, at a #Bitcoin conference in Texas that he will be headquartering Ethereum in Zug, Switzerland in order to evade securities law of the United States. Approximately 70% of Ethereum's supply was given or sold to Ethereum's founders and a few insider investors before Ethereum was made available to the public in an Initial Coin Offering. Vitalik explains here that Ethereum is a business. He is making an investment pitch to the audience. This is the definition of a security. #Bitcoin is the only crypto asset that has been deemed a true commodity by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). #BTC
2:03

#Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin explains why Ethereum is an unregistered security and therefore illegal in the United States. SEC and Gary Gensler, are you paying attention? Vitalik explains here on March 3, 2014, at a #Bitcoin conference in Texas that he will be headquartering Ethereum in Zug, Switzerland in order to evade securities law of the United States. Approximately 70% of Ethereum's supply was given or sold to Ethereum's founders and a few insider investors before Ethereum was made available to the public in an Initial Coin Offering. Vitalik explains here that Ethereum is a business. He is making an investment pitch to the audience. This is the definition of a security. #Bitcoin is the only crypto asset that has been deemed a true commodity by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). #BTC

Ben Hart

153,259 次观看 • 2 年前

Vitalik: The Blockchain Trilemma Is Being Solved On January 27, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin stated at the ETH ChiangMai togETHer Tuesday event that the long-held "blockchain trilemma" of scalability, consensus, and decentralization is not a mathematical theorem, but rather an engineering, stage-dependent challenge. With the advancement of technologies such as zk-SNARKs and PeerDAS at both the computation and data layers, Ethereum is attempting to achieve higher system capacity while maintaining strong consensus. These approaches are gradually being implemented on Ethereum, though further time is needed to validate their security and maturity. Source:
2:27

Vitalik: The Blockchain Trilemma Is Being Solved On January 27, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin stated at the ETH ChiangMai togETHer Tuesday event that the long-held "blockchain trilemma" of scalability, consensus, and decentralization is not a mathematical theorem, but rather an engineering, stage-dependent challenge. With the advancement of technologies such as zk-SNARKs and PeerDAS at both the computation and data layers, Ethereum is attempting to achieve higher system capacity while maintaining strong consensus. These approaches are gradually being implemented on Ethereum, though further time is needed to validate their security and maturity. Source:

Wu Blockchain

43,289 次观看 • 6 个月前

Vitalik Buterin on Ethereum as the economic layer for AI “The blockchain to me is the most natural way to allow applications and cooperation between many different people in the long term without needing to agree on who to trust. The other thing is also the economic layer. This is the layer where blockchains can support AIs.” Vitalik believes Ethereum will play a large role in the future of decentralized AI: “If you have more decentralized AI, that means you have different AIs (agents, programs) that are controlled by different people and need to interact with each other. And for that interaction to be possible, you need to have an economic layer. Either cooperation is based on economic incentives and economic rules. Or it’s based on central control. It’s usually one of the two, and if we can set up the economic system, that makes more decentralized interaction between AIs possible.” Source: OKX (Apr 2026) Read our full article on why AI agents will need Ethereum for low-risk DeFi below👇
1:18

Vitalik Buterin on Ethereum as the economic layer for AI “The blockchain to me is the most natural way to allow applications and cooperation between many different people in the long term without needing to agree on who to trust. The other thing is also the economic layer. This is the layer where blockchains can support AIs.” Vitalik believes Ethereum will play a large role in the future of decentralized AI: “If you have more decentralized AI, that means you have different AIs (agents, programs) that are controlled by different people and need to interact with each other. And for that interaction to be possible, you need to have an economic layer. Either cooperation is based on economic incentives and economic rules. Or it’s based on central control. It’s usually one of the two, and if we can set up the economic system, that makes more decentralized interaction between AIs possible.” Source: OKX (Apr 2026) Read our full article on why AI agents will need Ethereum for low-risk DeFi below👇

Etherealize

115,396 次观看 • 3 个月前

BREAKING: Vitalik Buterin just issued a warning the market is ignoring completely. Crypto dies fast if it stays about gambling with no real-world use. He's not predicting it. He's describing what already happened. Pumpfun. Memecoins. Leverage on tokens with no underlying value. Every warning met with more speculation. The founder of Ethereum watching his creation being used for exactly what he built it to replace. Here is the honest tension worth sitting with: - The CLARITY Act is passing. - BlackRock is building on Ethereum. - Institutions are tokenizing real assets. And retail is still chasing memecoins. Two completely different versions of crypto existing simultaneously. One building real infrastructure. One running a casino. Vitalik is describing the ceiling. The market is sprinting at it. When the builder and the buyer disagree this hard. One of them is early. The other is wrong.
0:34

BREAKING: Vitalik Buterin just issued a warning the market is ignoring completely. Crypto dies fast if it stays about gambling with no real-world use. He's not predicting it. He's describing what already happened. Pumpfun. Memecoins. Leverage on tokens with no underlying value. Every warning met with more speculation. The founder of Ethereum watching his creation being used for exactly what he built it to replace. Here is the honest tension worth sitting with: - The CLARITY Act is passing. - BlackRock is building on Ethereum. - Institutions are tokenizing real assets. And retail is still chasing memecoins. Two completely different versions of crypto existing simultaneously. One building real infrastructure. One running a casino. Vitalik is describing the ceiling. The market is sprinting at it. When the builder and the buyer disagree this hard. One of them is early. The other is wrong.

Crypto Tice

223,356 次观看 • 2 个月前

Destra Network | $DSYNC Introducing Destra Decentralized DNS This marks a significant milestone for decentralized finance: the launch of the first-ever on-chain platform primarily focused on making domain names accessible to the masses without any centralized intervention, powered by destra net. Destra Labs has engineered gas-efficient hybrid contracts inspired by combining the best of both ERC1185 and ERC137, primarily focusing on providing truly decentralized domain names. Until now, all DeFi dApps have relied on centralized domain names controlled by centralized organizations like ICANN and centralized registrars. A major concern with these centralized domains is the amount of control centralized DNS servers exert over the domain names. For instance, an employee working for a DNS server's organization could alter a zone record for a domain like and redirect it to a phishing dApp, potentially leading to the loss of billions of dollars in user funds. With Destra Decentralized DNS, the power lies in the hands of the domain owner, ensuring complete control over where the domain directs users. Unlike previous attempts, Destra DNS remains focused on the core purpose of a domain name: serving decentralized web applications.
1:03

Destra Network | $DSYNC Introducing Destra Decentralized DNS This marks a significant milestone for decentralized finance: the launch of the first-ever on-chain platform primarily focused on making domain names accessible to the masses without any centralized intervention, powered by destra net. Destra Labs has engineered gas-efficient hybrid contracts inspired by combining the best of both ERC1185 and ERC137, primarily focusing on providing truly decentralized domain names. Until now, all DeFi dApps have relied on centralized domain names controlled by centralized organizations like ICANN and centralized registrars. A major concern with these centralized domains is the amount of control centralized DNS servers exert over the domain names. For instance, an employee working for a DNS server's organization could alter a zone record for a domain like and redirect it to a phishing dApp, potentially leading to the loss of billions of dollars in user funds. With Destra Decentralized DNS, the power lies in the hands of the domain owner, ensuring complete control over where the domain directs users. Unlike previous attempts, Destra DNS remains focused on the core purpose of a domain name: serving decentralized web applications.

Destra Network

238,580 次观看 • 2 年前

☀️ Solana is now live on We’re thrilled to bring seamless cross-chain swaps with $SOL ↔️ #Bitcoin, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polkadot & more! Explore one of the most exciting Web3 ecosystems with incredible speed and low fees, or swap $SOL $BTC natively in a seamless, non-custodial manner - no more wrapping needed. 🟣Why Solana? Solana is one of the fastest Layer 1 blockchains out there, handling thousands of transactions per second with ultra-low fees. It’s already a favorite for DeFi, NFTs, and more due to its scalability and lightning-fast performance. Now, SwapKit.dev via CHAINFLIP, users can swap $SOL and $USDC (SPL) with major blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum without relying on centralized exchanges. Everything happens in a decentralized, trustless way—just the way it should be. 🧠Getting Started Simply connect your Solana wallet to THORSwap, choose your assets, and enjoy frictionless cross-chain swaps with lower slippage and better rates. A new era of cross-chain trading is here—start exploring it today on THORSwap ⚡ #BetterThanCEX! 🚀
0:46

☀️ Solana is now live on We’re thrilled to bring seamless cross-chain swaps with $SOL ↔️ #Bitcoin, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polkadot & more! Explore one of the most exciting Web3 ecosystems with incredible speed and low fees, or swap $SOL $BTC natively in a seamless, non-custodial manner - no more wrapping needed. 🟣Why Solana? Solana is one of the fastest Layer 1 blockchains out there, handling thousands of transactions per second with ultra-low fees. It’s already a favorite for DeFi, NFTs, and more due to its scalability and lightning-fast performance. Now, SwapKit.dev via CHAINFLIP, users can swap $SOL and $USDC (SPL) with major blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum without relying on centralized exchanges. Everything happens in a decentralized, trustless way—just the way it should be. 🧠Getting Started Simply connect your Solana wallet to THORSwap, choose your assets, and enjoy frictionless cross-chain swaps with lower slippage and better rates. A new era of cross-chain trading is here—start exploring it today on THORSwap ⚡ #BetterThanCEX! 🚀

THORSwap ⚡ #BetterThanCEX

26,980 次观看 • 1 年前

$ICP = World Computer (Since 2015)⬇️ In 2014, dom williams.icp ∞ , Chief Scientist of the DFINITY Foundation became involved with the early Ethereum community. At the time, the concept of a blockchain that could run software (i.e. smart contracts), which stored and processed data within an unstoppable, tamperproof and autonomous on-chain environment, was both revolutionary and controversial within the industry. At some point, the concept of a blockchain playing the role of a “World Computer” was mooted within the Ethereum community. One interpretation was that such a network would perform a trickle of simple but important smart contract computations for the world. However, Dominic’s interpretation, based on his work, was that World Computer blockchain would inevitably eventually host much of humanity’s systems and services, and all its data and compute, largely replacing traditional IT, and transforming social media, gaming, finance, enterprise systems and many other domains. In 2015, however, Dominic was a lone heretic, and was largely alone in believing that the creation of a true World Computer blockchain was technically feasible, let alone that it might be capable of successfully playing that role in competition with centralized computing infrastructure. Since Dominic strongly believed otherwise, based on his accumulated technical experiences and work on crypto theory, he decided to dedicate himself to blockchain research that might realize the concept, originally, he hoped, in the form a more advanced Ethereum 2.0. He stopped work on Pebble, and directed all his future efforts towards the realization of the World Computer blockchain vision. In early 2015, Dominic’s thinking about blockchain design had become more mature, and he began proposing new approaches to consensus, applied cryptography and blockchain network architecture. Around that time, he began using the name DFINITY as a brand for his work, which takes its characters from decentralized infinity. Through the period 2015 to 2016, Vitalik Buterin, and associates such as Vlad Zamfir, were the Ethereum project’s primary consensus researchers, and were highly focused on developing cryptoeconomic schemes, including under the Casper banner. Meanwhile, Dominic was more focused on finding new ways to leverage advanced cryptography and distributed computing math, and devising alternative blockchain architectures, which might enable a World Computer to be produced. Owing to the long-term nature of Dominic’s work, and it’s more technical approach, eventually it became clear to him that DFINITY should become an independent project. Panel Moderator: Martin Koeppelmann, Panel (from Right to Left): Dominic Williams, Vitalik Buterin, Vlad Zamfir, Jae Kwon, Recorded at the Silicon Valley Ethereum Meetup – October 22nd, 2016
1:34

$ICP = World Computer (Since 2015)⬇️ In 2014, dom williams.icp ∞ , Chief Scientist of the DFINITY Foundation became involved with the early Ethereum community. At the time, the concept of a blockchain that could run software (i.e. smart contracts), which stored and processed data within an unstoppable, tamperproof and autonomous on-chain environment, was both revolutionary and controversial within the industry. At some point, the concept of a blockchain playing the role of a “World Computer” was mooted within the Ethereum community. One interpretation was that such a network would perform a trickle of simple but important smart contract computations for the world. However, Dominic’s interpretation, based on his work, was that World Computer blockchain would inevitably eventually host much of humanity’s systems and services, and all its data and compute, largely replacing traditional IT, and transforming social media, gaming, finance, enterprise systems and many other domains. In 2015, however, Dominic was a lone heretic, and was largely alone in believing that the creation of a true World Computer blockchain was technically feasible, let alone that it might be capable of successfully playing that role in competition with centralized computing infrastructure. Since Dominic strongly believed otherwise, based on his accumulated technical experiences and work on crypto theory, he decided to dedicate himself to blockchain research that might realize the concept, originally, he hoped, in the form a more advanced Ethereum 2.0. He stopped work on Pebble, and directed all his future efforts towards the realization of the World Computer blockchain vision. In early 2015, Dominic’s thinking about blockchain design had become more mature, and he began proposing new approaches to consensus, applied cryptography and blockchain network architecture. Around that time, he began using the name DFINITY as a brand for his work, which takes its characters from decentralized infinity. Through the period 2015 to 2016, Vitalik Buterin, and associates such as Vlad Zamfir, were the Ethereum project’s primary consensus researchers, and were highly focused on developing cryptoeconomic schemes, including under the Casper banner. Meanwhile, Dominic was more focused on finding new ways to leverage advanced cryptography and distributed computing math, and devising alternative blockchain architectures, which might enable a World Computer to be produced. Owing to the long-term nature of Dominic’s work, and it’s more technical approach, eventually it became clear to him that DFINITY should become an independent project. Panel Moderator: Martin Koeppelmann, Panel (from Right to Left): Dominic Williams, Vitalik Buterin, Vlad Zamfir, Jae Kwon, Recorded at the Silicon Valley Ethereum Meetup – October 22nd, 2016

Fabio

12,765 次观看 • 9 个月前

TOKENFI TOKEN LAUNCHER IS LIVE ON MAINNET IT’S OFFICIAL! TokenFi Token Launcher is live on the mainnet of five top EVM blockchains: Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Arbitrum, and opBNB. With TokenFi Token Launcher, ANYONE can create a fungible crypto token (ERC-20), NFT (ERC-721), or Multi-Token (ERC-1155) in just a few clicks, regardless of their crypto experience. The TokenFi platform and framework has been thoroughly audited and is being monitored in real-time by industry-leading blockchain security auditor Certik. This means that the tokens you create with TokenFi are safe and audited. TokenFi Token Launcher is powered by $TOKEN as its main utility token, and every successful transaction on the Ethereum and BNB blockchains buys and burns $TOKEN, enhancing its utility and making it perpetually deflationary as adoption of the platform grows. TokenFi Token Launcher aims to be the dominant token creation platform on EVM blockchains, and to this effect, we will be rolling out the platform on dozens of additional EVM blockchains in the coming weeks and months. You can learn more about TokenFi Token Launcher here:
0:34

TOKENFI TOKEN LAUNCHER IS LIVE ON MAINNET IT’S OFFICIAL! TokenFi Token Launcher is live on the mainnet of five top EVM blockchains: Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Arbitrum, and opBNB. With TokenFi Token Launcher, ANYONE can create a fungible crypto token (ERC-20), NFT (ERC-721), or Multi-Token (ERC-1155) in just a few clicks, regardless of their crypto experience. The TokenFi platform and framework has been thoroughly audited and is being monitored in real-time by industry-leading blockchain security auditor Certik. This means that the tokens you create with TokenFi are safe and audited. TokenFi Token Launcher is powered by $TOKEN as its main utility token, and every successful transaction on the Ethereum and BNB blockchains buys and burns $TOKEN, enhancing its utility and making it perpetually deflationary as adoption of the platform grows. TokenFi Token Launcher aims to be the dominant token creation platform on EVM blockchains, and to this effect, we will be rolling out the platform on dozens of additional EVM blockchains in the coming weeks and months. You can learn more about TokenFi Token Launcher here:

TokenFi

1,288,973 次观看 • 2 年前

President Trump posted this Explanation on what BITCOIN is… • In the video, Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research at Coin Center, delivers an explanation of Bitcoin during a U.S. Senate hearing. • He describes Bitcoin as the world's first cryptocurrency, powered by the first public blockchain network, which enables anyone to send and receive value globally using just a computer and internet connection—without relying on trusted middlemen like BANKS. • He emphasizes its revolutionary nature as the first public digital payments infrastructure, comparable to the internet for information but for money. • Unlike traditional systems that depend on PRIVATE banks to update ledgers, Bitcoin uses a PUBLIC blockchain where anyone can create an address for free and transfer funds, regardless of background or credit status. • Van Valkenburgh argues that Bitcoin's decentralized design addresses flaws in centralized systems, which have single points of failure leading to massive breaches, such as the Equifax hack exposing 143 million Americans' data, SWIFT network frauds totaling hundreds of millions (including North Korean involvement), a $1.8 billion robbery at Punjab National Bank, and a 2016 botnet attack disrupting major websites. He extends this to the Internet of Things, citing hacks of pacemakers, baby monitors, and vehicles. • He advocates for building more public infrastructure like blockchains to reduce reliance on powerful corporate intermediaries, foster competition, and prevent failures. • Bitcoin, he says, is a computer science breakthrough akin to the internet, promoting freedom, prosperity, and human flourishing, with potential to replace other centralized chokepoints.
6:13

President Trump posted this Explanation on what BITCOIN is… • In the video, Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research at Coin Center, delivers an explanation of Bitcoin during a U.S. Senate hearing. • He describes Bitcoin as the world's first cryptocurrency, powered by the first public blockchain network, which enables anyone to send and receive value globally using just a computer and internet connection—without relying on trusted middlemen like BANKS. • He emphasizes its revolutionary nature as the first public digital payments infrastructure, comparable to the internet for information but for money. • Unlike traditional systems that depend on PRIVATE banks to update ledgers, Bitcoin uses a PUBLIC blockchain where anyone can create an address for free and transfer funds, regardless of background or credit status. • Van Valkenburgh argues that Bitcoin's decentralized design addresses flaws in centralized systems, which have single points of failure leading to massive breaches, such as the Equifax hack exposing 143 million Americans' data, SWIFT network frauds totaling hundreds of millions (including North Korean involvement), a $1.8 billion robbery at Punjab National Bank, and a 2016 botnet attack disrupting major websites. He extends this to the Internet of Things, citing hacks of pacemakers, baby monitors, and vehicles. • He advocates for building more public infrastructure like blockchains to reduce reliance on powerful corporate intermediaries, foster competition, and prevent failures. • Bitcoin, he says, is a computer science breakthrough akin to the internet, promoting freedom, prosperity, and human flourishing, with potential to replace other centralized chokepoints.

MJTruthUltra

114,510 次观看 • 1 年前

New Professionally Curious w/ Joanna Zeng @ SOON (🔴,💊)📍🇺🇸🗽 (100x Arc) + @valardragon Co-Founder of Osmosis Zone From cryptography to Cosmos, Dev shares how Osmosis is tackling MEV, privacy, and cross-chain UX to shape the next era of DeFi. A deep dive into decentralization, performance, and why privacy-first infrastructure will define the future of crypto. SOON takeaway: The next wave of DeFi belongs to systems that balance speed, privacy, and trust. Like Osmosis, SOON is building high-performance infrastructure where transparency and user control coexist — powering a more private, scalable on-chain future. Key Highlights: • From cryptography to founding Osmosis • Privacy and anonymity as DeFi’s next frontier • Tackling MEV and fairness in decentralized systems • Cross-chain UX as the key to mainstream adoption • Institutional influence on DeFi infrastructure • Balancing decentralization, performance, and scale • Why privacy is essential in the age of AI ⏱️ Timestamps 00:00 Founding Osmosis & Dev's early crypto journey 04:12 Cryptography, privacy, and anonymity 07:40 Solving MEV and improving fairness in DeFi 10:35 The importance of cross-chain UX 13:55 How institutions are reshaping DeFi 17:10 Decentralization vs. performance 20:45 Why privacy matters in the AI era 23:30 The future of DeFi and Osmosis’ long-term vision Listen to the full episode below👇
40:21

New Professionally Curious w/ Joanna Zeng @ SOON (🔴,💊)📍🇺🇸🗽 (100x Arc) + @valardragon Co-Founder of Osmosis Zone From cryptography to Cosmos, Dev shares how Osmosis is tackling MEV, privacy, and cross-chain UX to shape the next era of DeFi. A deep dive into decentralization, performance, and why privacy-first infrastructure will define the future of crypto. SOON takeaway: The next wave of DeFi belongs to systems that balance speed, privacy, and trust. Like Osmosis, SOON is building high-performance infrastructure where transparency and user control coexist — powering a more private, scalable on-chain future. Key Highlights: • From cryptography to founding Osmosis • Privacy and anonymity as DeFi’s next frontier • Tackling MEV and fairness in decentralized systems • Cross-chain UX as the key to mainstream adoption • Institutional influence on DeFi infrastructure • Balancing decentralization, performance, and scale • Why privacy is essential in the age of AI ⏱️ Timestamps 00:00 Founding Osmosis & Dev's early crypto journey 04:12 Cryptography, privacy, and anonymity 07:40 Solving MEV and improving fairness in DeFi 10:35 The importance of cross-chain UX 13:55 How institutions are reshaping DeFi 17:10 Decentralization vs. performance 20:45 Why privacy matters in the AI era 23:30 The future of DeFi and Osmosis’ long-term vision Listen to the full episode below👇

SOON - Solana Optimistic Network (Mainnet Arc)

42,556 次观看 • 10 个月前

Doom Debate with vitalik.eth has dropped: Will “d/acc” Protect Humanity from Superintelligent AI? Vitalik is both a hardcore techno-optimist and builder, and someone willing to seriously consider AI regulation and coordination mechanisms. He coined the term "d/acc'" – defensive, decentralized acceleration – as a middle path between uncritical AI acceleration and total pause scenarios. We debate the tractability of AI alignment, whether approaches like d/acc would actually work when superintelligence arrives, and why he thinks a pluralistic world of competing AIs might be safer than a single aligned superintelligence. The crux of our disagreement is that I think we're heading for a "plants vs. animals" scenario where AI will simply operate on timescales we can't match, while Vitalik believes we can maintain agency through the right combination of defensive technologies and institutional design. Finally, we tackle the discourse itself – I ask Vitalik to debunk the common ad hominem attacks against AI doomers, from "it's just a fringe position" to "no real builders believe in doom." His responses carry weight given his credibility as both a successful entrepreneur and someone who's maintained intellectual honesty throughout his career. Big thanks to Vitalik for a good-faith debate!
0:37

Doom Debate with vitalik.eth has dropped: Will “d/acc” Protect Humanity from Superintelligent AI? Vitalik is both a hardcore techno-optimist and builder, and someone willing to seriously consider AI regulation and coordination mechanisms. He coined the term "d/acc'" – defensive, decentralized acceleration – as a middle path between uncritical AI acceleration and total pause scenarios. We debate the tractability of AI alignment, whether approaches like d/acc would actually work when superintelligence arrives, and why he thinks a pluralistic world of competing AIs might be safer than a single aligned superintelligence. The crux of our disagreement is that I think we're heading for a "plants vs. animals" scenario where AI will simply operate on timescales we can't match, while Vitalik believes we can maintain agency through the right combination of defensive technologies and institutional design. Finally, we tackle the discourse itself – I ask Vitalik to debunk the common ad hominem attacks against AI doomers, from "it's just a fringe position" to "no real builders believe in doom." His responses carry weight given his credibility as both a successful entrepreneur and someone who's maintained intellectual honesty throughout his career. Big thanks to Vitalik for a good-faith debate!

Liron Shapira

177,711 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 SPECIAL COLLABORATION ANNOUNCEMENT 🚨 NIANNIAN 🤝 MOODENG With the spirit of “Do only good every day,” we are proud to share a meaningful collaboration between two memecoins – two blockchains – one shared mission: NianNian – a memecoin on BNB Chain, 100% focused on education and charity, pioneering the real-world adoption of Giggle Academy, the free education platform founded by CZ. NianNian has already brought knowledge and kindness to over 100 locations in 22 countries, contributing more than 179 educational stories for children worldwide. Moo Deng Supporters – a memecoin on Ethereum, created under the vision of Vitalik Buterin. Moo Deng has no central team, no insiders — just a strong community and a spirit of charity with real action every single day. The Moo Deng community has organized many charitable activities for children in several countries around the world. 🤝 Through this collaboration, NianNian and Moo Deng will: - Spread free global education through Giggle Academy. - Support the creation of new educational and meaningful stories for children. - Launch charity initiatives that deliver real impact to underprivileged communities. ✨ Two memecoins – two chains – one shared mission: Bringing knowledge, kindness, and trust to millions of lives. Built by the community. Shared by the community. Together, we meme something greater.
2:37

🚨 SPECIAL COLLABORATION ANNOUNCEMENT 🚨 NIANNIAN 🤝 MOODENG With the spirit of “Do only good every day,” we are proud to share a meaningful collaboration between two memecoins – two blockchains – one shared mission: NianNian – a memecoin on BNB Chain, 100% focused on education and charity, pioneering the real-world adoption of Giggle Academy, the free education platform founded by CZ. NianNian has already brought knowledge and kindness to over 100 locations in 22 countries, contributing more than 179 educational stories for children worldwide. Moo Deng Supporters – a memecoin on Ethereum, created under the vision of Vitalik Buterin. Moo Deng has no central team, no insiders — just a strong community and a spirit of charity with real action every single day. The Moo Deng community has organized many charitable activities for children in several countries around the world. 🤝 Through this collaboration, NianNian and Moo Deng will: - Spread free global education through Giggle Academy. - Support the creation of new educational and meaningful stories for children. - Launch charity initiatives that deliver real impact to underprivileged communities. ✨ Two memecoins – two chains – one shared mission: Bringing knowledge, kindness, and trust to millions of lives. Built by the community. Shared by the community. Together, we meme something greater.

NiannianCTO_BNB🔶️🐈

103,145 次观看 • 1 年前

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: Lex Fridman (Jun 2021)
2:04

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: Lex Fridman (Jun 2021)

Etherealize

102,091 次观看 • 5 个月前