Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Voting machines are so great and accurate they take days and weeks yet we used to count them by hand faster and more efficiently. Let the dems cheating begin again. 🤡

105,529 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Ian Miles Cheong
Ian Miles Cheongvor 1 Jahr

They’re so great and accurate that most countries banned them.

Profilbild von Gregstradamus
Gregstradamusvor 1 Jahr

We all know they are gonna cheat. It’s no surprise

Profilbild von Blair
Blairvor 1 Jahr

Yeah, the math on this is seems to be 2×3=rooster.

Profilbild von Zenzei
Zenzeivor 1 Jahr

Your phone, comunicates with your router most of the times, or do you have a satelite phone?

Profilbild von Roger Caution 🇺🇸🇮🇹🇫🇷⛪️
Roger Caution 🇺🇸🇮🇹🇫🇷⛪️vor 1 Jahr

So let me get this straight — you are so gorgeous and stunning and I am suppose to just take the heartbreak? Oh the misery. Oh the torment

Profilbild von XRP Ron
XRP Ronvor 1 Jahr

They can, they don't want to count ballots in 24 hours.

Profilbild von John Trump
John Trumpvor 1 Jahr

This is still my fav of all time 🤣 🎯

Profilbild von Subliminal7
Subliminal7vor 1 Jahr

👆👆👆🚨

Profilbild von TomAllen
TomAllenvor 1 Jahr

They will try to steal it again. This time, IP addresses and MAC addresses will be monitored live instead of forensically after the election.

Profilbild von On Borrowed Time
On Borrowed Timevor 1 Jahr

Agree with everything you said... except your cell phone doesn't communicate with satellites in space. You have to have a satellite phone to do that and they cost $10s of thousands ❤️

Ähnliche Videos

ELECTION INTEGRITY: It’s truly something that Senator Raphael Warnock is more concerned about the accuracy of a hand count than the results churned out by Dominion Voting Machines. His fear? That a hand count could show Trump won Georgia, while the Dominion machines show Kamala Harris as the victor, leading to the state refusing to certify Harris's win. This isn’t just a hypothetical concern—Warnock is suggesting that hand counts could reveal discrepancies, and apparently, that’s a problem. But shouldn’t the goal be to ensure the candidate who gets the most votes actually wins, regardless of the method? Let’s break this down. Each precinct in Georgia is responsible for hand-counting around 1,900 ballots within a five-hour window. That’s hardly an insurmountable task. It’s actually a highly manageable one that ensures the vote tallies reported by Dominion machines are accurate. If these machines are as flawless as their defenders claim, then what’s the harm in double-checking? A hand count would only serve to confirm the machines’ accuracy, wouldn’t it? Warnock seems to believe that a hand count showing a different outcome would cause chaos. But here’s the solution: if discrepancies are found that could alter the election outcome, those ballots can—and should—be hand-counted again, as many times as needed, to ensure the most accurate results. That's how you ensure that the true will of the voters is reflected, not through blind trust in machines but through verification when needed. So, why the resistance to hand counts? If the machines and hand counts match up, great—everyone wins. But if they don't, it’s democracy doing its job—catching errors and correcting course. The real question here is: why is Senator Warnock so worried about verifying the results? Could it be that some are afraid the hand count might not align with the narrative they’re pushing?

@amuse

9,022,239 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr