正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🔥Wait a second. Did everyone catch that? Booker keeps pressing Kash on his Grand Jury testimony AGAIN. Kash Patel says “HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT WAS ASKED IN THE GRAND JURY IF YOU WEREN’T THERE??” He’s right..how TF would be know? Did Kash just insinuate that the Grand Jury... show more

Johnny St.Pete

86,813 subscribers

3,019,309 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

In this clip, Kash Patel says the grand jury heard evidence that Comey deleted the '8647' post and apologized. Neither fact appears in the indictment. Hmm. Did the FBI director just disclose evidence presented before a grand jury?

In this clip, Kash Patel says the grand jury heard evidence that Comey deleted the '8647' post and apologized. Neither fact appears in the indictment. Hmm. Did the FBI director just disclose evidence presented before a grand jury?

Anna Bower

996,222 次观看 • 2 个月前

I think we all know how Kash Patel got his FBI Director position after hearing how he was called as a witness by the Court and had to give Grand Jury testimony in Trump’s Documents case.He was given immunity and plead the fifth to questions allegedly to protect Trump.

I think we all know how Kash Patel got his FBI Director position after hearing how he was called as a witness by the Court and had to give Grand Jury testimony in Trump’s Documents case.He was given immunity and plead the fifth to questions allegedly to protect Trump.

Suzie rizzio

21,381 次观看 • 1 个月前

Senator WhiteHouse caught Kash Patel lying under Oath after he made false statements about his Grand Jury testimony in the Maralago Documents case being sealed & the Judge says that’s not true.He also plead the fifth & now we know how he ended up with this position he has!

Senator WhiteHouse caught Kash Patel lying under Oath after he made false statements about his Grand Jury testimony in the Maralago Documents case being sealed & the Judge says that’s not true.He also plead the fifth & now we know how he ended up with this position he has!

Suzie rizzio

35,556 次观看 • 1 个月前

Andrew Weissmann: It is a very, very low standard to get a grand jury subpoena and it is exceptionally hard to have a grand jury subpoena quashed. The judge... relies on absolutely clear Supreme Court precedent that says that you cannot use grand jury subpoenas to just harass somebody.

Andrew Weissmann: It is a very, very low standard to get a grand jury subpoena and it is exceptionally hard to have a grand jury subpoena quashed. The judge... relies on absolutely clear Supreme Court precedent that says that you cannot use grand jury subpoenas to just harass somebody.

Blue Georgia

72,658 次观看 • 4 个月前

Goldman: Your testimony here is that all of those witness statements are under a protective order? Patel: We are providing everything we can legally provide conscious. Goldman: That's not my question. My question is, why are those witness statements that are not grand jury testimony, that if they were under a protective order are no longer under a protective order, why are they not being released? Patel: How are they not under protective order? Goldman: Why are you not going to the court like you did for the grand jury testimony to unseal those records? Patel: The DOJ did go to the court. Goldman: Not on those records. You are hiding the files. You are part of the coverup.

Goldman: Your testimony here is that all of those witness statements are under a protective order? Patel: We are providing everything we can legally provide conscious. Goldman: That's not my question. My question is, why are those witness statements that are not grand jury testimony, that if they were under a protective order are no longer under a protective order, why are they not being released? Patel: How are they not under protective order? Goldman: Why are you not going to the court like you did for the grand jury testimony to unseal those records? Patel: The DOJ did go to the court. Goldman: Not on those records. You are hiding the files. You are part of the coverup.

Acyn

130,493 次观看 • 9 个月前

“What we’re seeing is a grand jury indictment that is sealed, but also a search warrant that is part of the grand jury action. So we don’t wanna be too premature, but I do know that it covers 2020 information up to 2024” Senator Mark Finchem discusses FBI seizure in Maricopa County

“What we’re seeing is a grand jury indictment that is sealed, but also a search warrant that is part of the grand jury action. So we don’t wanna be too premature, but I do know that it covers 2020 information up to 2024” Senator Mark Finchem discusses FBI seizure in Maricopa County

Just the News

25,222 次观看 • 4 个月前

#BREAKING: Psaki: You mentioned that she [Pam Bondi] passed the buck to Kash Patel. What questions do you have for Patel? Rep Subramanyam: “She [Pam Bondi] was saying over and over again that he would not release files to the DOJ. So DOJ did not have files to release because Kash Patel was sitting on them the whole time, so I would want to know what Kash Patel was doing this whole time. He was on his podcast the last couple of years talking about the #Epstein files over and over again and how this was a deep state conspiracy to not release them, he had the files himself and wasn’t releasing them so what’s the deal, man? What’s going on?”😳😂

#BREAKING: Psaki: You mentioned that she [Pam Bondi] passed the buck to Kash Patel. What questions do you have for Patel? Rep Subramanyam: “She [Pam Bondi] was saying over and over again that he would not release files to the DOJ. So DOJ did not have files to release because Kash Patel was sitting on them the whole time, so I would want to know what Kash Patel was doing this whole time. He was on his podcast the last couple of years talking about the #Epstein files over and over again and how this was a deep state conspiracy to not release them, he had the files himself and wasn’t releasing them so what’s the deal, man? What’s going on?”😳😂

Emoluments Clause

26,531 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jen McCabe must think everyone is dumb. in an April 2022 grand jury she was asked 12 times about her statements regarding what KR said. Not once did she mention “I hit him 3x” Her reasoning - “I wasn’t asked that question.” She also claims she didn’t tell the grand jury about the jeep being out front because - You guessed it “she wasn’t asked.” However when it comes to answering questions regarding things that hurt her or the McAlberts, she has NO PROBLEM answering questions that she was not asked. Check it out ⬇️

Jen McCabe must think everyone is dumb. in an April 2022 grand jury she was asked 12 times about her statements regarding what KR said. Not once did she mention “I hit him 3x” Her reasoning - “I wasn’t asked that question.” She also claims she didn’t tell the grand jury about the jeep being out front because - You guessed it “she wasn’t asked.” However when it comes to answering questions regarding things that hurt her or the McAlberts, she has NO PROBLEM answering questions that she was not asked. Check it out ⬇️

Theecret Agent Flip

33,857 次观看 • 1 年前

CNN’s Scott Jennings on a grand jury rejecting the Trump administration’s attempts to charge the so-called ‘seditious six’ Democrat lawmakers... “Well, I think two things can be true. One, and I’ve been highly defensive of the grand jury system, whether it’s been in the cases in Virginia, the case in Minneapolis, this one — look, grand juries exist for a reason. Citizens go in there, they look at evidence, they make decisions. And I think if you’re going to cheer on a grand jury one week, you got to cheer on a grand jury in the next week. That’s number one. Number two, the video was extraordinarily irresponsible. Ridiculous not a one of them can yet name any illegal order that they’re referencing. Not one of them has ever been able to name the illegal orders. Extremely irresponsible. Is that criminal? That’s up to a grand jury. A grand jury says no.” “I mean, this video was extraordinarily irresponsible but, you know, I’m not even sure what they were proposing to charge them with. I’m not sure the reporting has that, but obviously a grand jury looked at it and said no. Now am I super surprised about that? Look, Donald Trump got 6.5% of the vote in the District of Columbia. Do I am I surprised that 20 people from D.C. went into a room and wouldn’t follow the Trump DOJ’s recommendations? No, I’m not super surprised.”

CNN’s Scott Jennings on a grand jury rejecting the Trump administration’s attempts to charge the so-called ‘seditious six’ Democrat lawmakers... “Well, I think two things can be true. One, and I’ve been highly defensive of the grand jury system, whether it’s been in the cases in Virginia, the case in Minneapolis, this one — look, grand juries exist for a reason. Citizens go in there, they look at evidence, they make decisions. And I think if you’re going to cheer on a grand jury one week, you got to cheer on a grand jury in the next week. That’s number one. Number two, the video was extraordinarily irresponsible. Ridiculous not a one of them can yet name any illegal order that they’re referencing. Not one of them has ever been able to name the illegal orders. Extremely irresponsible. Is that criminal? That’s up to a grand jury. A grand jury says no.” “I mean, this video was extraordinarily irresponsible but, you know, I’m not even sure what they were proposing to charge them with. I’m not sure the reporting has that, but obviously a grand jury looked at it and said no. Now am I super surprised about that? Look, Donald Trump got 6.5% of the vote in the District of Columbia. Do I am I surprised that 20 people from D.C. went into a room and wouldn’t follow the Trump DOJ’s recommendations? No, I’m not super surprised.”

Curtis Houck

19,876 次观看 • 5 个月前

Kash Patel says he can’t release the FBI’s Epstein Files because of a “court order.” But in the court’s recent order denying the release of grand jury material, the judge explicitly wrote that the FBI’s investigative materials can be released. Donald Trump is in the files and Patel is covering up for him.

Kash Patel says he can’t release the FBI’s Epstein Files because of a “court order.” But in the court’s recent order denying the release of grand jury material, the judge explicitly wrote that the FBI’s investigative materials can be released. Donald Trump is in the files and Patel is covering up for him.

Rep. Dan Goldman

196,233 次观看 • 9 个月前

Matt Taibbi makes an excellent point. Now that Biden issued blanket pardons to all those people, they can no longer plead the fifth. Every last one should be hauled before Congress or a grand jury. I can't wait for Pam Bondi and Kash Patel to get confirmed.

Matt Taibbi makes an excellent point. Now that Biden issued blanket pardons to all those people, they can no longer plead the fifth. Every last one should be hauled before Congress or a grand jury. I can't wait for Pam Bondi and Kash Patel to get confirmed.

Gunther Eagleman™

488,246 次观看 • 1 年前

“The U.N. — I don’t care what the U.N. says. The U.N. doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Maduro is indicted by a grand jury in the Southern District of New York.” “That means the Southern District of New York presented the evidence to a grand jury, and a grand jury indicted him. And then a superseding indictment came out that was unsealed about a year and a half ago that specifically detailed Maduro’s actions.” “Let there be no doubt: Nicolás Maduro is an indicted drug trafficker in the United States, and he’s a fugitive of American justice.” — Secretary of State Marco Rubio, 9/4/25

“The U.N. — I don’t care what the U.N. says. The U.N. doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Maduro is indicted by a grand jury in the Southern District of New York.” “That means the Southern District of New York presented the evidence to a grand jury, and a grand jury indicted him. And then a superseding indictment came out that was unsealed about a year and a half ago that specifically detailed Maduro’s actions.” “Let there be no doubt: Nicolás Maduro is an indicted drug trafficker in the United States, and he’s a fugitive of American justice.” — Secretary of State Marco Rubio, 9/4/25

Hillel Neuer

112,352 次观看 • 6 个月前

BOMBSHELL ALLEGATION: Did former Dominion executive Eric Coomer lie under oath to the Georgia grand jury that indicted President Trump in Fani Willis’ RICO case? A newly filed motion in Coomer v. Byrne claims Coomer’s January 27, 2026 deposition contradicts his 2022 Fulton County grand jury testimony - where he stated he had no access and no technical capability to compromise voting machines or election systems. Patrick Byrne’s attorneys argue there are “irreconcilable differences” between the two sworn statements and have attached the Georgia grand jury transcript as Exhibit A in their effort to unseal the deposition. The motion also alleges Dominion CEO John Poulos made conflicting statements in separate proceedings before the Michigan Senate. If these claims are substantiated, they would raise serious questions about testimony presented to the grand jury in one of the most consequential indictments in modern political history. This would be HUGE if proven true.

BOMBSHELL ALLEGATION: Did former Dominion executive Eric Coomer lie under oath to the Georgia grand jury that indicted President Trump in Fani Willis’ RICO case? A newly filed motion in Coomer v. Byrne claims Coomer’s January 27, 2026 deposition contradicts his 2022 Fulton County grand jury testimony - where he stated he had no access and no technical capability to compromise voting machines or election systems. Patrick Byrne’s attorneys argue there are “irreconcilable differences” between the two sworn statements and have attached the Georgia grand jury transcript as Exhibit A in their effort to unseal the deposition. The motion also alleges Dominion CEO John Poulos made conflicting statements in separate proceedings before the Michigan Senate. If these claims are substantiated, they would raise serious questions about testimony presented to the grand jury in one of the most consequential indictments in modern political history. This would be HUGE if proven true.

LindellTV

185,277 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇺🇸 PRESS SEC LEAVITT ON MAXWELL GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS Reporter: “A judge ruled that the grand jury transcripts in Ghislaine Maxwell’s case should not be.” Leavitt: “We think that is unfortunate. The president wants to see credible evidence released. As for the appeal process I would send you to the Department of Justice for that.” Source: Acyn

🇺🇸 PRESS SEC LEAVITT ON MAXWELL GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS Reporter: “A judge ruled that the grand jury transcripts in Ghislaine Maxwell’s case should not be.” Leavitt: “We think that is unfortunate. The president wants to see credible evidence released. As for the appeal process I would send you to the Department of Justice for that.” Source: Acyn

Mario Nawfal

50,255 次观看 • 11 个月前

BANNON: Do you believe that John Brennan is actually going to be indicted by a grand jury on federal crimes? JOHN SOLOMON: I think they're moving in that direction. The fact that Congress is now officially transmitting evidence to a prosecutor and to a grand jury tells you that they're getting very close to making that decision. John Solomon

BANNON: Do you believe that John Brennan is actually going to be indicted by a grand jury on federal crimes? JOHN SOLOMON: I think they're moving in that direction. The fact that Congress is now officially transmitting evidence to a prosecutor and to a grand jury tells you that they're getting very close to making that decision. John Solomon

Bannon’s WarRoom

15,376 次观看 • 3 个月前

Reporter: This indictment charged against James Comey was never actually presented to the full grand jury. The original indictment that Lindsey Halligan presented was 3 counts. That grand jury felt that there was not enough evidence to charge Comey on one of the counts. Halligan reprinted a new version of the indictment, and instead of re-presenting it to the full grand jury, she just had the foreperson sign it. This is a major procedural mishap because the indictment against him could be seen as invalidated.

Reporter: This indictment charged against James Comey was never actually presented to the full grand jury. The original indictment that Lindsey Halligan presented was 3 counts. That grand jury felt that there was not enough evidence to charge Comey on one of the counts. Halligan reprinted a new version of the indictment, and instead of re-presenting it to the full grand jury, she just had the foreperson sign it. This is a major procedural mishap because the indictment against him could be seen as invalidated.

FactPost

101,273 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 NEW: Tim Dillon on Kash Patel “If I had a dispute with DoorDash and Kash Patel was investigating it, would I get the credit? I imagine I would not. I imagine if there was a DoorDash dispute the head of the FBI couldn’t secure my credit of $11.90. What is this guy doing? This guy who did this to Charlie, his parents turned him in. What could Kash Patel run credibly? I don’t know.”

🚨 NEW: Tim Dillon on Kash Patel “If I had a dispute with DoorDash and Kash Patel was investigating it, would I get the credit? I imagine I would not. I imagine if there was a DoorDash dispute the head of the FBI couldn’t secure my credit of $11.90. What is this guy doing? This guy who did this to Charlie, his parents turned him in. What could Kash Patel run credibly? I don’t know.”

Autism Capital 🧩

847,996 次观看 • 10 个月前