正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Walk me through a media optimization workflow "The best way to think about biologics manufacturing is to think about it as high precision manufacturing, closer to semiconductor manufacturing. That's really the reason why Samsung Biologics is in the position that they are — because they took what they learned... show more

owl

15,452 subscribers

12,103 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Reporter: Trump says that he likes tariffs because they will bring manufacturing back to the United States. How many companies have moved 100% of their manufacturing to the US since Trump took office? Well, the answer is pretty clear. Zero.

Reporter: Trump says that he likes tariffs because they will bring manufacturing back to the United States. How many companies have moved 100% of their manufacturing to the US since Trump took office? Well, the answer is pretty clear. Zero.

FactPost

418,035 次观看 • 1 年前

Trumps's now had Most of the major Pharmaceutical companies make the pilgrimage to the Oval Office to stand like children as he announces they are "volunteering" to slash their prices by historic levels. HE CAUGHT THEM ALL. AND NOW THEY ARE PAYING. We are told this is because of tariffs.... Does this completely make sense? WHY - like the other companies such as Apple, Honda, Ford, etc, would they not simply MOVE their manufacturing facilities back to the US, AVOID the tariffs completely and NOT have to lower their prices. Automated machines that squeeze out pills are ALOT easier to move and reopen here than complicated processes like car or electronics manufacturing. What is different here? Trump is showing you that Big Pharma is in complete and total SUBMISSION. That is why, the AI, Car, electronic, etc companies are being allowed to repatriate their manufacturing, while Big Pharma is being stripped of their cash flow and profits, right in front of our faces. HE CAUGHT THEM ALL. AND NOW THEY ARE PAYING.

Trumps's now had Most of the major Pharmaceutical companies make the pilgrimage to the Oval Office to stand like children as he announces they are "volunteering" to slash their prices by historic levels. HE CAUGHT THEM ALL. AND NOW THEY ARE PAYING. We are told this is because of tariffs.... Does this completely make sense? WHY - like the other companies such as Apple, Honda, Ford, etc, would they not simply MOVE their manufacturing facilities back to the US, AVOID the tariffs completely and NOT have to lower their prices. Automated machines that squeeze out pills are ALOT easier to move and reopen here than complicated processes like car or electronics manufacturing. What is different here? Trump is showing you that Big Pharma is in complete and total SUBMISSION. That is why, the AI, Car, electronic, etc companies are being allowed to repatriate their manufacturing, while Big Pharma is being stripped of their cash flow and profits, right in front of our faces. HE CAUGHT THEM ALL. AND NOW THEY ARE PAYING.

NewsTreason Channel 17

237,523 次观看 • 8 个月前

Apple CEO Tim Cook on "low manufacturing wage" in China: "The popular conception is that companies come to China because of low labor costs. I'm not sure what part of China they go to, but the China stopped being the low labor cost country years ago. That is not the reason to come to China from a supply point of view. The reason is because of the skill."

Apple CEO Tim Cook on "low manufacturing wage" in China: "The popular conception is that companies come to China because of low labor costs. I'm not sure what part of China they go to, but the China stopped being the low labor cost country years ago. That is not the reason to come to China from a supply point of view. The reason is because of the skill."

S.L. Kanthan

7,416,267 次观看 • 2 年前

Blumenthal: In Ukraine, I've gone to drone manufacturing facilities. They're producing 1,000 drones a day. They get real time information from the battlefield and make adjustments as they are manufacturing. I don't know anything in our industrial base that is as agile. 1/

Blumenthal: In Ukraine, I've gone to drone manufacturing facilities. They're producing 1,000 drones a day. They get real time information from the battlefield and make adjustments as they are manufacturing. I don't know anything in our industrial base that is as agile. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

600,487 次观看 • 3 个月前

I hope people understand what the media is doing. They are actively trying to convince the public that Pierre is the reason for people crossing the floor. They sure don’t want you to think about what these Party traitors were offered to cross. And why do they care so much about getting Pierre out? Because he is still the Libs biggest threat.

I hope people understand what the media is doing. They are actively trying to convince the public that Pierre is the reason for people crossing the floor. They sure don’t want you to think about what these Party traitors were offered to cross. And why do they care so much about getting Pierre out? Because he is still the Libs biggest threat.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

60,446 次观看 • 4 个月前

.Elon Musk: “Manufacturing is underrated. Design is overrated.” “The amount of effort that goes into design rounds down to zero.” “People who haven’t been in the manufacturing of something new don’t understand.” “They think design is hard and that production is like a copier.”

.Elon Musk: “Manufacturing is underrated. Design is overrated.” “The amount of effort that goes into design rounds down to zero.” “People who haven’t been in the manufacturing of something new don’t understand.” “They think design is hard and that production is like a copier.”

Jawwwn

363,719 次观看 • 6 个月前

Elon Musk: Manufacturing a product is ten thousand percent more work than designing it. “Manufacturing is underrated and design is overrated. People generally think of this Eureka moment, where you come up with an idea and that is it, now it is good. But there is literally a thousand percent, maybe ten thousand percent more work that goes into the production system than the thing itself. The amount of effort that goes into the design rounds down to zero, relative to the effort that goes into the manufacturing system. If people have not been in manufacturing of something relatively new, they do not understand. They think production is like a copier. This is completely false.” Starbase Tour with Everyday Astronaut, July 30, 2021.

Elon Musk: Manufacturing a product is ten thousand percent more work than designing it. “Manufacturing is underrated and design is overrated. People generally think of this Eureka moment, where you come up with an idea and that is it, now it is good. But there is literally a thousand percent, maybe ten thousand percent more work that goes into the production system than the thing itself. The amount of effort that goes into the design rounds down to zero, relative to the effort that goes into the manufacturing system. If people have not been in manufacturing of something relatively new, they do not understand. They think production is like a copier. This is completely false.” Starbase Tour with Everyday Astronaut, July 30, 2021.

ELON CLIPS

432,857 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gov. Mike DeWine (R-OH) said President Trump’s policy on removing Temporary Protected Status for Haitians “is wrong” because of how it would impact the manufacturing economy in Springfield, Ohio. “Springfield is an industrial city, manufacturing city that was down. It has been coming back. And frankly, one of the reasons it's coming back is because of the Haitians who are working there,” he said Friday. “These are people who, if you talk to the employers, they were filling jobs that were not being able to be filled in any other way.”

Gov. Mike DeWine (R-OH) said President Trump’s policy on removing Temporary Protected Status for Haitians “is wrong” because of how it would impact the manufacturing economy in Springfield, Ohio. “Springfield is an industrial city, manufacturing city that was down. It has been coming back. And frankly, one of the reasons it's coming back is because of the Haitians who are working there,” he said Friday. “These are people who, if you talk to the employers, they were filling jobs that were not being able to be filled in any other way.”

Face The Nation

528,652 次观看 • 6 个月前

The Musk-Led Manufacturing Revolution Nobody Is Talking About | ZeroHedge When most analysts discuss Tesla, they focus on new vehicles or the electric vehicle company’s advancements in autonomy. Yet, according to Launch i/o CEO Jeff Lutz, one of the most significant—and under-discussed—developments at Tesla is happening not in its design studios or on the road, but in its factories. Lutz, a former executive at Google and Motorola, argues that Tesla’s true innovation isn’t just the electric vehicles or robots it’s building, but how those products are being made. The company’s first-principles approach to manufacturing is a radical departure from the industry norm, focusing not just on cheap labor or existing models, but on rethinking the entire production process. Tesla is creating factories that are the product—designing, testing, and perfecting every element just as they do with their cars. This focus on manufacturing efficiency, Lutz believes, will lead to a dramatic reduction in production costs, potentially bringing them closer to zero. And this shift in how products are built—rather than merely assembled—could set a new standard for the entire manufacturing world. FARZAD MESBAHI: It's no wonder that innovation has been lacking so much it's because we've brute forced essentially manufacturing by leveraging globalization because we had that $2 an hour rate in China or Mexico wherever else like we're not like well we have to just get really good at building stuff to be competitive I was like nah just let him do it like we'll get get our margins just let them do it. JEFF LUTZ: The most under-discussed thing in the analyst world about Tesla is not the new vehicles coming, nor the growing discussions about autonomy, but rather Tesla's next product: their new way of manufacturing. It's a big deal, a huge step in how products are made today, and I don't think many investment firms have the right research people actually looking into what this impact is and what it's going to enable. It's going to enable the variable cost to build products to shrink further and further, approaching zero. This is the step function needed for cost reduction to achieve further scale, and I don’t think enough people are talking about it. It’s going to be how the Cybertruck is made, how Optimus will be made. Tesla versions its factories like they version their product. They spend time perfecting it and have design reviews of their factory designs just as they do with their products. They have specs and performance attributes they are trying to meet. This is very different from what happens at other companies at the executive level. FARZAD MESBAHI: This is such a profound statement because a lot of the stories that I hear are related to, like, say Tesla capitalizing on making manufacturing the product—really just honing in so much on the factory that it becomes the product, the you know, and where we throw around 2 million cars per year, five million cars per year per factory, tens of millions of bots per year sooner than people think. The usual narrative is crazy, pie-in-the-sky; they can't do that, look at Ford, look at BYD, they can only do so much. But what we're missing here is that we've had decades of just sitting on our asses, leveraging cheaper labor versus going out of our way to really push the boundaries of engineering and manufacturing. And now that we have a company that's willing to do that because the leader is viewing that as a first principles approach to manufacturing, right? Instead of like, okay, cheap labor is good, but why aren’t we pushing manufacturing and engineering as much as we can to make this as efficient and as productive as possible? Of course they’re extremely talented, they’re doing something very unique, but it’s also on the backs of 30-40 years of, I’m going to call it laziness. Like, you're just taking the easy way out, and I get it, more profits, you're taking care of shareholders—I get it—but you're not really pushing the boundaries of manufacturing. I think what this leads to is, if companies and leaders truly take this to heart, we’re going to see an explosion in manufacturing across the board. It’s not just going to be a Tesla thing; I think we’re going to see it all over the place. JEFF LUTZ: I’m advising companies on this now, you're going to see massive localization of manufacturing. People think costs just instantly go up when you do that. They do unmitigated, but if you're a company like Tesla and you're thinking about it the way they do, they're actually focused on localizing and making costs go down. Think of it, how many auto factories are expanding in Germany? Just answer that question. Read more:

The Musk-Led Manufacturing Revolution Nobody Is Talking About | ZeroHedge When most analysts discuss Tesla, they focus on new vehicles or the electric vehicle company’s advancements in autonomy. Yet, according to Launch i/o CEO Jeff Lutz, one of the most significant—and under-discussed—developments at Tesla is happening not in its design studios or on the road, but in its factories. Lutz, a former executive at Google and Motorola, argues that Tesla’s true innovation isn’t just the electric vehicles or robots it’s building, but how those products are being made. The company’s first-principles approach to manufacturing is a radical departure from the industry norm, focusing not just on cheap labor or existing models, but on rethinking the entire production process. Tesla is creating factories that are the product—designing, testing, and perfecting every element just as they do with their cars. This focus on manufacturing efficiency, Lutz believes, will lead to a dramatic reduction in production costs, potentially bringing them closer to zero. And this shift in how products are built—rather than merely assembled—could set a new standard for the entire manufacturing world. FARZAD MESBAHI: It's no wonder that innovation has been lacking so much it's because we've brute forced essentially manufacturing by leveraging globalization because we had that $2 an hour rate in China or Mexico wherever else like we're not like well we have to just get really good at building stuff to be competitive I was like nah just let him do it like we'll get get our margins just let them do it. JEFF LUTZ: The most under-discussed thing in the analyst world about Tesla is not the new vehicles coming, nor the growing discussions about autonomy, but rather Tesla's next product: their new way of manufacturing. It's a big deal, a huge step in how products are made today, and I don't think many investment firms have the right research people actually looking into what this impact is and what it's going to enable. It's going to enable the variable cost to build products to shrink further and further, approaching zero. This is the step function needed for cost reduction to achieve further scale, and I don’t think enough people are talking about it. It’s going to be how the Cybertruck is made, how Optimus will be made. Tesla versions its factories like they version their product. They spend time perfecting it and have design reviews of their factory designs just as they do with their products. They have specs and performance attributes they are trying to meet. This is very different from what happens at other companies at the executive level. FARZAD MESBAHI: This is such a profound statement because a lot of the stories that I hear are related to, like, say Tesla capitalizing on making manufacturing the product—really just honing in so much on the factory that it becomes the product, the you know, and where we throw around 2 million cars per year, five million cars per year per factory, tens of millions of bots per year sooner than people think. The usual narrative is crazy, pie-in-the-sky; they can't do that, look at Ford, look at BYD, they can only do so much. But what we're missing here is that we've had decades of just sitting on our asses, leveraging cheaper labor versus going out of our way to really push the boundaries of engineering and manufacturing. And now that we have a company that's willing to do that because the leader is viewing that as a first principles approach to manufacturing, right? Instead of like, okay, cheap labor is good, but why aren’t we pushing manufacturing and engineering as much as we can to make this as efficient and as productive as possible? Of course they’re extremely talented, they’re doing something very unique, but it’s also on the backs of 30-40 years of, I’m going to call it laziness. Like, you're just taking the easy way out, and I get it, more profits, you're taking care of shareholders—I get it—but you're not really pushing the boundaries of manufacturing. I think what this leads to is, if companies and leaders truly take this to heart, we’re going to see an explosion in manufacturing across the board. It’s not just going to be a Tesla thing; I think we’re going to see it all over the place. JEFF LUTZ: I’m advising companies on this now, you're going to see massive localization of manufacturing. People think costs just instantly go up when you do that. They do unmitigated, but if you're a company like Tesla and you're thinking about it the way they do, they're actually focused on localizing and making costs go down. Think of it, how many auto factories are expanding in Germany? Just answer that question. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

58,478 次观看 • 1 年前

Katherine Boyle says SpaceX’s legacy will be the thousands of companies that spawn from the school of Elon Musk: "What we've learned from the SpaceX story is that these kinds of companies can be built." "It is one of the most important companies in America. It's beloved by Americans across the country for what it's been able to achieve." "The legacy of SpaceX is going to be hundreds, if not thousands of companies—people who've gone to the school of Elon Musk, they've learned manufacturing and they've built companies, and built products in a way that they can take to new companies in manufacturing and defense, and drones and hypersonics—all of these other categories that SpaceX doesn't do." "We're incredibly excited about SpaceX. We're incredibly excited for what it's achieved for the American people and what it's going to lead to over the next 25 years." Katherine Boyle on FOX Business

Katherine Boyle says SpaceX’s legacy will be the thousands of companies that spawn from the school of Elon Musk: "What we've learned from the SpaceX story is that these kinds of companies can be built." "It is one of the most important companies in America. It's beloved by Americans across the country for what it's been able to achieve." "The legacy of SpaceX is going to be hundreds, if not thousands of companies—people who've gone to the school of Elon Musk, they've learned manufacturing and they've built companies, and built products in a way that they can take to new companies in manufacturing and defense, and drones and hypersonics—all of these other categories that SpaceX doesn't do." "We're incredibly excited about SpaceX. We're incredibly excited for what it's achieved for the American people and what it's going to lead to over the next 25 years." Katherine Boyle on FOX Business

a16z

658,981 次观看 • 5 个月前

“England is applauded for being in the fore front of ending slave trade, but what's no said is that England needed to end slave trade because it was harming the development of industrial manufacturing capitalism. They have to end it because they needed people to be employed in factories.”

“England is applauded for being in the fore front of ending slave trade, but what's no said is that England needed to end slave trade because it was harming the development of industrial manufacturing capitalism. They have to end it because they needed people to be employed in factories.”

Ozor Ndi Ozor

40,726 次观看 • 6 个月前

Peter Thiel reveals the uncomfortable rule behind why competition is for losers "We think of capitalism and competition as synonyms. I believe they are antonyms." "In business, all happy companies are different because they figured out something unique to do. And all unhappy companies are alike because they fail to escape the essential sameness that is competition."

Peter Thiel reveals the uncomfortable rule behind why competition is for losers "We think of capitalism and competition as synonyms. I believe they are antonyms." "In business, all happy companies are different because they figured out something unique to do. And all unhappy companies are alike because they fail to escape the essential sameness that is competition."

andrew engler

43,108 次观看 • 3 个月前

David Friedberg says China is deliberately commoditizing the knowledge economy because it already holds 20X our manufacturing capacity and is heading to 8X our electricity. "I'll just zoom out for a second. Think about the strategy for China." "If you think about the global economy of the last 50 years, the US has accrued so much value by being at the core of the knowledge economy, and effectively a services economy." "Through the development of intellectual property, of IP, of knowledge, and the conversion of one bit to another bit, we've been able to derive trillions of dollars in GDP." "Meanwhile, we outsourced manufacturing and created a sleeping giant in China, where they have this incredible manufacturing capacity..." "All of technology ultimately leads to that simple equation: molecule conversion... Everything in our world is driven by molecule conversion..." "And what's left is the value of the molecule economy. When you look at the juxtaposition of China versus the United States today, we have one terawatt of electricity production capacity in the US, and they're on their way to having eight." "We have about 10 billion square feet of manufacturing capacity; they have 200 billion... So they have 20X the manufacturing capacity, 8X the electricity production." "And I think that's the long game for China: over a two, three decade process, by compressing the knowledge economy and the services economy, commoditizing it completely, they are left holding all the value in the global economy because they can make stuff, and they can make it cheaper than anyone because they have the most electricity production."

David Friedberg says China is deliberately commoditizing the knowledge economy because it already holds 20X our manufacturing capacity and is heading to 8X our electricity. "I'll just zoom out for a second. Think about the strategy for China." "If you think about the global economy of the last 50 years, the US has accrued so much value by being at the core of the knowledge economy, and effectively a services economy." "Through the development of intellectual property, of IP, of knowledge, and the conversion of one bit to another bit, we've been able to derive trillions of dollars in GDP." "Meanwhile, we outsourced manufacturing and created a sleeping giant in China, where they have this incredible manufacturing capacity..." "All of technology ultimately leads to that simple equation: molecule conversion... Everything in our world is driven by molecule conversion..." "And what's left is the value of the molecule economy. When you look at the juxtaposition of China versus the United States today, we have one terawatt of electricity production capacity in the US, and they're on their way to having eight." "We have about 10 billion square feet of manufacturing capacity; they have 200 billion... So they have 20X the manufacturing capacity, 8X the electricity production." "And I think that's the long game for China: over a two, three decade process, by compressing the knowledge economy and the services economy, commoditizing it completely, they are left holding all the value in the global economy because they can make stuff, and they can make it cheaper than anyone because they have the most electricity production."

Fireside Alpha

17,030 次观看 • 1 个月前