Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 WALL STREET IS REPEATING THE EXACT SAME MISTAKE THAT ENDED THE DOT-COM ERA. The AI semiconductor rally is now following almost the exact same structure as 1999–2000. Big correction. Vertical recovery. Then full-blown euphoria. The last time this setup appeared, the Nasdaq crashed nearly 80%.

208,777 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

35 Comments

Waterbongo's profile picture
Waterbongo3 months ago

dot-com comparison gets overused every cycle

LuxAlgo's profile picture
LuxAlgo3 months ago

Now let's do revenue comparisons of petsdotcom and Enron to Nvidia and Micron

Asaf Naamani's profile picture
Asaf Naamani3 months ago

If you want a fair comparison, start with the company’s revenue growth between those two periods. The numbers tell a very different story. Ignoring that context while presenting the comparison to 1.5 million followers can be misleading. Cheers.

Degen Flipper 🐂🀄️'s profile picture
Degen Flipper 🐂🀄️3 months ago

They’re just in denial. They’ll believe when the red candles rain from the heavens.

Norby's profile picture
Norby3 months ago

most of the AI companies generate positive free cash flow compared to the dot com era startups

BuySellStop's profile picture
BuySellStop3 months ago

look at the EPS. Internet stocks had NONE.

ZenAlgo's profile picture
ZenAlgo3 months ago

Comparing AI semis to the dot-com bubble feels like a lazy analogy. Yes, the market is stretched. Yes, positioning is crowded. Yes, a lot of future growth is probably priced in. But that does not automatically make it 2000 again. Dot-com was full of companies with no earnings, no durable business model and mostly narrative. Today’s AI leaders have real cash flows, pricing power and structural infrastructure demand. They can still fall. Even a lot. But the reason would not be “the chart looks like 2000.” It would be capex slowing, earnings revisions rolling over, breadth breaking down and flows no longer validating the valuation.

wayne's profile picture
wayne3 months ago

How do you not feel shameless doing the same tweet everyday

Leo Flores's profile picture
Leo Flores3 months ago

Bro stick to crypto lay the fuck of the stock market 🤣 the ai boom is backed up ya crypto hoes jelly as hell of the semiconductor run and it shows

$KAS IS KING 𐤊's profile picture
$KAS IS KING 𐤊3 months ago

Fundamentals differ dramatically:Dot-com era: Many companies (e.g., had little to no revenue, profits, or sustainable models. Cisco (a common Nvidia parallel) traded at extreme multiples (~200x P/E at peak) with hype around the internet that was real but over-extrapolated. Today (2026): Leaders like Nvidia have massive real revenues/profits from actual AI demand. Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, etc.) are spending hundreds of billions on data centers/capex. Earnings growth has been strong, driving the broader market (S&P 500 up ~7-11% YTD as of mid-June 2026, with records). Valuations are elevated (Nvidia forward P/E in the 30-60x range in recent comparisons, far below Cisco's peak). Economic and tech context:Dot-com crash hit amid broader excesses + rate hikes. AI today is backed by tangible infrastructure demand, productivity potential, and corporate spending (not just retail speculation). Semiconductor growth forecasts remain robust (20%+ in recent years). The market isn't purely "AI semis"—breadth has varied, and the overall economy has shown resilience.

Gegas0r's profile picture
Gegas0r3 months ago

The similarity is scary at this point that’s why we need to act accordingly..

Kryll's profile picture
Kryll3 months ago

Cisco was trading at over 100x P/E in 2000 and NVDA is sitting around 35x forward. The charts look identical but the actual earnings behind them aren't even comparable

IAM£R£X 🦅's profile picture
IAM£R£X 🦅3 months ago

Cold 🥶

Bitcoin Intelligence's profile picture
Bitcoin Intelligence3 months ago

Maybe. But the key difference is that the dot-com bubble was built on promises, while today’s AI leaders are generating real revenue, real cash flow, and seeing massive enterprise adoption. That doesn’t mean a crash is impossible—euphoria always creates risk. But comparing every AI rally to 2000 ignores how much stronger the fundamentals are this time around. History rhymes, it doesn’t always repeat.

UCRYPTO's profile picture
UCRYPTO3 months ago

Both the charts are very very matchable

老特币 2.0 🔶 BNB's profile picture
老特币 2.0 🔶 BNB3 months ago

This is scary man

Vuori Trading's profile picture
Vuori Trading3 months ago

Ai bubble is printing

Thatcher Coleman's profile picture
Thatcher Coleman3 months ago

feels like déjà vu, hope it doesn’t go that deep this time

Gold Byte's profile picture
Gold Byte3 months ago

Lo más estúpido que he visto… mientras que en las .com las empresas no ganaban dinero y solo crecían por una moda, ahora son las empresas más rentables del mundo con unos márgenes de beneficio increíbles, nada tiene que ver.

GROWTH IN WEB3 🙂‍↔️'s profile picture
GROWTH IN WEB3 🙂‍↔️3 months ago

The difference is that AI companies already have revenue, customers, and real-world demand. That's not something many dot-com companies could say in 2000.

★ Uroš Razinger ★ 🇪🇺's profile picture
★ Uroš Razinger ★ 🇪🇺3 months ago

Super interesting breakdown, the parallels to 2000 are honestly pretty spooky.

VOX Markets's profile picture
VOX Markets3 months ago

Not the doom-posters trying to convince everyone that NVIDIA and Micron are the exact same thing as in 1999...

Mr Anonymous's profile picture
Mr Anonymous3 months ago

Euphoria is usually loudest near the top.

🥷 Amit.hl's profile picture
🥷 Amit.hl3 months ago

Fiat has lost a lot of value since 2000 - Check the gold ratio! Less scary!

Tom Kelly's profile picture
Tom Kelly3 months ago

interesting

gurkha's profile picture
gurkha3 months ago

This man brig any chart any time without match. Don’t trust

Mr Anonymous's profile picture
Mr Anonymous3 months ago

Every bubble looks justified until it isn't.

IAM£R£X 🦅's profile picture
IAM£R£X 🦅3 months ago

This is bad When will it end ? 😭

Michael L Brown's profile picture
Michael L Brown3 months ago

Check Stochastic RSI and MACD If its above 90 its over bought and it will definietly comes down. Just by looking at the candles i would short this chart in a trade.

SHIFT's profile picture
SHIFT3 months ago

only a matter of time

Mia's profile picture
Mia3 months ago

History doesn't repeat exactly.But greed always rhymes.

Fiona Rose's profile picture
Fiona Rose3 months ago

The future belongs to the era of technology; selling the products you have chosen simply because of market panic would be a mistake!

Crypto Titan's profile picture
Crypto Titan3 months ago

History repeating itself

Alex Kent's profile picture
Alex Kent3 months ago

It’s different this time

Isla's profile picture
Isla3 months ago

The last time this scenario unfolded, the Nasdaq index experienced a sharp pullback from its highs, followed by a brief yet violent rebound, ultimately leading to the bursting of the dot-com bubble

Related Videos