Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 WALL STREET IS REPEATING THE EXACT SAME MISTAKE THAT ENDED THE DOT-COM ERA. The AI semiconductor rally is now following almost the exact same structure as 1999–2000. Big correction. Vertical recovery. Then full-blown euphoria. The last time this setup appeared, the Nasdaq crashed nearly 80%.

208,777 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von Waterbongo
Waterbongovor 3 Monaten

dot-com comparison gets overused every cycle

Profilbild von LuxAlgo
LuxAlgovor 3 Monaten

Now let's do revenue comparisons of petsdotcom and Enron to Nvidia and Micron

Profilbild von Asaf Naamani
Asaf Naamanivor 3 Monaten

If you want a fair comparison, start with the company’s revenue growth between those two periods. The numbers tell a very different story. Ignoring that context while presenting the comparison to 1.5 million followers can be misleading. Cheers.

Profilbild von Degen Flipper 🐂🀄️
Degen Flipper 🐂🀄️vor 3 Monaten

They’re just in denial. They’ll believe when the red candles rain from the heavens.

Profilbild von Norby
Norbyvor 3 Monaten

most of the AI companies generate positive free cash flow compared to the dot com era startups

Profilbild von BuySellStop
BuySellStopvor 3 Monaten

look at the EPS. Internet stocks had NONE.

Profilbild von ZenAlgo
ZenAlgovor 3 Monaten

Comparing AI semis to the dot-com bubble feels like a lazy analogy. Yes, the market is stretched. Yes, positioning is crowded. Yes, a lot of future growth is probably priced in. But that does not automatically make it 2000 again. Dot-com was full of companies with no earnings, no durable business model and mostly narrative. Today’s AI leaders have real cash flows, pricing power and structural infrastructure demand. They can still fall. Even a lot. But the reason would not be “the chart looks like 2000.” It would be capex slowing, earnings revisions rolling over, breadth breaking down and flows no longer validating the valuation.

Profilbild von wayne
waynevor 3 Monaten

How do you not feel shameless doing the same tweet everyday

Profilbild von Leo Flores
Leo Floresvor 3 Monaten

Bro stick to crypto lay the fuck of the stock market 🤣 the ai boom is backed up ya crypto hoes jelly as hell of the semiconductor run and it shows

Profilbild von $KAS IS KING 𐤊
$KAS IS KING 𐤊vor 3 Monaten

Fundamentals differ dramatically:Dot-com era: Many companies (e.g., had little to no revenue, profits, or sustainable models. Cisco (a common Nvidia parallel) traded at extreme multiples (~200x P/E at peak) with hype around the internet that was real but over-extrapolated. Today (2026): Leaders like Nvidia have massive real revenues/profits from actual AI demand. Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, etc.) are spending hundreds of billions on data centers/capex. Earnings growth has been strong, driving the broader market (S&P 500 up ~7-11% YTD as of mid-June 2026, with records). Valuations are elevated (Nvidia forward P/E in the 30-60x range in recent comparisons, far below Cisco's peak). Economic and tech context:Dot-com crash hit amid broader excesses + rate hikes. AI today is backed by tangible infrastructure demand, productivity potential, and corporate spending (not just retail speculation). Semiconductor growth forecasts remain robust (20%+ in recent years). The market isn't purely "AI semis"—breadth has varied, and the overall economy has shown resilience.

Profilbild von Gegas0r
Gegas0rvor 3 Monaten

The similarity is scary at this point that’s why we need to act accordingly..

Profilbild von Kryll
Kryllvor 3 Monaten

Cisco was trading at over 100x P/E in 2000 and NVDA is sitting around 35x forward. The charts look identical but the actual earnings behind them aren't even comparable

Profilbild von IAM£R£X 🦅
IAM£R£X 🦅vor 3 Monaten

Cold 🥶

Profilbild von Bitcoin Intelligence
Bitcoin Intelligencevor 3 Monaten

Maybe. But the key difference is that the dot-com bubble was built on promises, while today’s AI leaders are generating real revenue, real cash flow, and seeing massive enterprise adoption. That doesn’t mean a crash is impossible—euphoria always creates risk. But comparing every AI rally to 2000 ignores how much stronger the fundamentals are this time around. History rhymes, it doesn’t always repeat.

Profilbild von UCRYPTO
UCRYPTOvor 3 Monaten

Both the charts are very very matchable

Profilbild von 老特币 2.0 🔶 BNB
老特币 2.0 🔶 BNBvor 3 Monaten

This is scary man

Profilbild von Vuori Trading
Vuori Tradingvor 3 Monaten

Ai bubble is printing

Profilbild von Thatcher Coleman
Thatcher Colemanvor 3 Monaten

feels like déjà vu, hope it doesn’t go that deep this time

Profilbild von Gold Byte
Gold Bytevor 3 Monaten

Lo más estúpido que he visto… mientras que en las .com las empresas no ganaban dinero y solo crecían por una moda, ahora son las empresas más rentables del mundo con unos márgenes de beneficio increíbles, nada tiene que ver.

Profilbild von GROWTH IN WEB3 🙂‍↔️
GROWTH IN WEB3 🙂‍↔️vor 3 Monaten

The difference is that AI companies already have revenue, customers, and real-world demand. That's not something many dot-com companies could say in 2000.

Profilbild von ★ Uroš Razinger ★ 🇪🇺
★ Uroš Razinger ★ 🇪🇺vor 3 Monaten

Super interesting breakdown, the parallels to 2000 are honestly pretty spooky.

Profilbild von VOX Markets
VOX Marketsvor 3 Monaten

Not the doom-posters trying to convince everyone that NVIDIA and Micron are the exact same thing as in 1999...

Profilbild von Mr Anonymous
Mr Anonymousvor 3 Monaten

Euphoria is usually loudest near the top.

Profilbild von 🥷 Amit.hl
🥷 Amit.hlvor 3 Monaten

Fiat has lost a lot of value since 2000 - Check the gold ratio! Less scary!

Profilbild von Tom Kelly
Tom Kellyvor 3 Monaten

interesting

Profilbild von gurkha
gurkhavor 3 Monaten

This man brig any chart any time without match. Don’t trust

Profilbild von Mr Anonymous
Mr Anonymousvor 3 Monaten

Every bubble looks justified until it isn't.

Profilbild von IAM£R£X 🦅
IAM£R£X 🦅vor 3 Monaten

This is bad When will it end ? 😭

Profilbild von Michael L Brown
Michael L Brownvor 3 Monaten

Check Stochastic RSI and MACD If its above 90 its over bought and it will definietly comes down. Just by looking at the candles i would short this chart in a trade.

Profilbild von SHIFT
SHIFTvor 3 Monaten

only a matter of time

Profilbild von Mia
Miavor 3 Monaten

History doesn't repeat exactly.But greed always rhymes.

Profilbild von Fiona Rose
Fiona Rosevor 3 Monaten

The future belongs to the era of technology; selling the products you have chosen simply because of market panic would be a mistake!

Profilbild von Crypto Titan
Crypto Titanvor 3 Monaten

History repeating itself

Profilbild von Alex Kent
Alex Kentvor 3 Monaten

It’s different this time

Profilbild von Isla
Islavor 3 Monaten

The last time this scenario unfolded, the Nasdaq index experienced a sharp pullback from its highs, followed by a brief yet violent rebound, ultimately leading to the bursting of the dot-com bubble

Ähnliche Videos