正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨 WALL STREET IS REPEATING THE EXACT SAME MISTAKE THAT ENDED THE DOT-COM ERA. The AI semiconductor rally is now following almost the exact same structure as 1999–2000. Big correction. Vertical recovery. Then full-blown euphoria. The last time this setup appeared, the Nasdaq crashed nearly 80%.

208,777 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

Waterbongo 的头像
Waterbongo3 个月前

dot-com comparison gets overused every cycle

LuxAlgo 的头像
LuxAlgo3 个月前

Now let's do revenue comparisons of petsdotcom and Enron to Nvidia and Micron

Asaf Naamani 的头像
Asaf Naamani3 个月前

If you want a fair comparison, start with the company’s revenue growth between those two periods. The numbers tell a very different story. Ignoring that context while presenting the comparison to 1.5 million followers can be misleading. Cheers.

Degen Flipper 🐂🀄️ 的头像
Degen Flipper 🐂🀄️3 个月前

They’re just in denial. They’ll believe when the red candles rain from the heavens.

Norby 的头像
Norby3 个月前

most of the AI companies generate positive free cash flow compared to the dot com era startups

BuySellStop 的头像
BuySellStop3 个月前

look at the EPS. Internet stocks had NONE.

ZenAlgo 的头像
ZenAlgo3 个月前

Comparing AI semis to the dot-com bubble feels like a lazy analogy. Yes, the market is stretched. Yes, positioning is crowded. Yes, a lot of future growth is probably priced in. But that does not automatically make it 2000 again. Dot-com was full of companies with no earnings, no durable business model and mostly narrative. Today’s AI leaders have real cash flows, pricing power and structural infrastructure demand. They can still fall. Even a lot. But the reason would not be “the chart looks like 2000.” It would be capex slowing, earnings revisions rolling over, breadth breaking down and flows no longer validating the valuation.

wayne 的头像
wayne3 个月前

How do you not feel shameless doing the same tweet everyday

Leo Flores 的头像
Leo Flores3 个月前

Bro stick to crypto lay the fuck of the stock market 🤣 the ai boom is backed up ya crypto hoes jelly as hell of the semiconductor run and it shows

$KAS IS KING 𐤊 的头像
$KAS IS KING 𐤊3 个月前

Fundamentals differ dramatically:Dot-com era: Many companies (e.g., had little to no revenue, profits, or sustainable models. Cisco (a common Nvidia parallel) traded at extreme multiples (~200x P/E at peak) with hype around the internet that was real but over-extrapolated. Today (2026): Leaders like Nvidia have massive real revenues/profits from actual AI demand. Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, etc.) are spending hundreds of billions on data centers/capex. Earnings growth has been strong, driving the broader market (S&P 500 up ~7-11% YTD as of mid-June 2026, with records). Valuations are elevated (Nvidia forward P/E in the 30-60x range in recent comparisons, far below Cisco's peak). Economic and tech context:Dot-com crash hit amid broader excesses + rate hikes. AI today is backed by tangible infrastructure demand, productivity potential, and corporate spending (not just retail speculation). Semiconductor growth forecasts remain robust (20%+ in recent years). The market isn't purely "AI semis"—breadth has varied, and the overall economy has shown resilience.

Gegas0r 的头像
Gegas0r3 个月前

The similarity is scary at this point that’s why we need to act accordingly..

Kryll 的头像
Kryll3 个月前

Cisco was trading at over 100x P/E in 2000 and NVDA is sitting around 35x forward. The charts look identical but the actual earnings behind them aren't even comparable

IAM£R£X 🦅 的头像
IAM£R£X 🦅3 个月前

Cold 🥶

Bitcoin Intelligence 的头像
Bitcoin Intelligence3 个月前

Maybe. But the key difference is that the dot-com bubble was built on promises, while today’s AI leaders are generating real revenue, real cash flow, and seeing massive enterprise adoption. That doesn’t mean a crash is impossible—euphoria always creates risk. But comparing every AI rally to 2000 ignores how much stronger the fundamentals are this time around. History rhymes, it doesn’t always repeat.

UCRYPTO 的头像
UCRYPTO3 个月前

Both the charts are very very matchable

老特币 2.0 🔶 BNB 的头像
老特币 2.0 🔶 BNB3 个月前

This is scary man

Vuori Trading 的头像
Vuori Trading3 个月前

Ai bubble is printing

Thatcher Coleman 的头像
Thatcher Coleman3 个月前

feels like déjà vu, hope it doesn’t go that deep this time

Gold Byte 的头像
Gold Byte3 个月前

Lo más estúpido que he visto… mientras que en las .com las empresas no ganaban dinero y solo crecían por una moda, ahora son las empresas más rentables del mundo con unos márgenes de beneficio increíbles, nada tiene que ver.

GROWTH IN WEB3 🙂‍↔️ 的头像
GROWTH IN WEB3 🙂‍↔️3 个月前

The difference is that AI companies already have revenue, customers, and real-world demand. That's not something many dot-com companies could say in 2000.

★ Uroš Razinger ★ 🇪🇺 的头像
★ Uroš Razinger ★ 🇪🇺3 个月前

Super interesting breakdown, the parallels to 2000 are honestly pretty spooky.

VOX Markets 的头像
VOX Markets3 个月前

Not the doom-posters trying to convince everyone that NVIDIA and Micron are the exact same thing as in 1999...

Mr Anonymous 的头像
Mr Anonymous3 个月前

Euphoria is usually loudest near the top.

🥷 Amit.hl 的头像
🥷 Amit.hl3 个月前

Fiat has lost a lot of value since 2000 - Check the gold ratio! Less scary!

Tom Kelly 的头像
Tom Kelly3 个月前

interesting

gurkha 的头像
gurkha3 个月前

This man brig any chart any time without match. Don’t trust

Mr Anonymous 的头像
Mr Anonymous3 个月前

Every bubble looks justified until it isn't.

IAM£R£X 🦅 的头像
IAM£R£X 🦅3 个月前

This is bad When will it end ? 😭

Michael L Brown 的头像
Michael L Brown3 个月前

Check Stochastic RSI and MACD If its above 90 its over bought and it will definietly comes down. Just by looking at the candles i would short this chart in a trade.

SHIFT 的头像
SHIFT3 个月前

only a matter of time

Mia 的头像
Mia3 个月前

History doesn't repeat exactly.But greed always rhymes.

Fiona Rose 的头像
Fiona Rose3 个月前

The future belongs to the era of technology; selling the products you have chosen simply because of market panic would be a mistake!

Crypto Titan 的头像
Crypto Titan3 个月前

History repeating itself

Alex Kent 的头像
Alex Kent3 个月前

It’s different this time

Isla 的头像
Isla3 个月前

The last time this scenario unfolded, the Nasdaq index experienced a sharp pullback from its highs, followed by a brief yet violent rebound, ultimately leading to the bursting of the dot-com bubble

相关视频