Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Want Indian DeepTech? Start with Physics, not funding! Prof. Rajesh Gopakumar argues that India cannot build frontier technology without first building the deep science underneath it. That means more than throwing money at startups. We need more scientists, stronger institutions and people curious enough to discover things that haven't...

75,871 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

15 Kommentare

Profilbild von Aravind
Aravindvor 1 Monat

I will tell a better idea. India can build deep tech without anything except good IT teams. If you don't understand ask China.

Profilbild von The Rocket Media
The Rocket Mediavor 1 Monat

The legend has entered the chat

Profilbild von Vishwaguru
Vishwaguruvor 1 Monat

Promote MSc education over BTech .

Profilbild von Spontaneous Polarisation
Spontaneous Polarisationvor 1 Monat

Show me results first then I will give you money. But sir I need money to show you results.

Profilbild von The Rocket Media
The Rocket Mediavor 1 Monat

Sadly that's the vicious cycle that is hard to escape!

Profilbild von Kant immanuel
Kant immanuelvor 1 Monat

true. Make research cool here.

Profilbild von Ashwani Dev
Ashwani Devvor 1 Monat

Completely agree. Deep tech takes long lead time. Invest in fundamental research in quantum, aerospace, mineral research, energy, food based medications, medical research, research on civil and logistics infrastructure (just construction will not do).

Profilbild von Vedic Knowledge
Vedic Knowledgevor 23 Tagen

What if atoms are not objects but symbols of meaning? What if the universe is like a book and not like a box? What if the weirdness of quantum mechanics can be explained by postulating meaning as a fundamental feature of the universe?

Profilbild von Pawan Kumar
Pawan Kumarvor 1 Monat

@jhasushant

Profilbild von Malolan Cadambi
Malolan Cadambivor 1 Monat

Get your plumbing correct first. Learn to build sewerages before you build software!

Profilbild von AsgFoodBytes
AsgFoodBytesvor 1 Monat

Who studied extra cs to get into IT sector hire them.Start engaging professors and students from all backgrounds from colleges itself.Once people have knowledge that other departments have enough jobs they might do wonders

Profilbild von शोधक
शोधकvor 29 Tagen

People have no clue about the reality. Read Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Teachers’ Cadre) Act, 2019. Everything has been sacrificed at the altar of social justice! Top institutions are under huge pressure to recruit reservation faculty.

Profilbild von AsgFoodBytes
AsgFoodBytesvor 1 Monat

Why only talk this or that all thinks are connected u get ece demand in private sector people will have job security they will definitely choose it like it.We must focus on is mutual one trigers other.We already have thousands of iitians,nitians from ece

Profilbild von hatebuster
hatebustervor 1 Monat

This is an indictment of poor research infrastructure and lack of academic focus on cutting edge science education. The system and culture favors copy and apply model. BJP is more interested in propping up special interests like Adani and Ambani and lining politicians pockets.

Profilbild von dwasf
dwasfvor 1 Monat

US universities are well funded and get huge endowments. In China state universities are well funded. Till they were funded they produced anemic output. No army moves without food. Indians won't either.

Ähnliche Videos

Today, I’m proud to share something we’ve been building for months - Artham, India’s first Small Language Model (SLM) built exclusively for Indian Capital Markets. We unveiled it at AWS re:Invent 2025 in Las Vegas, marking a defining milestone for India, AI, and Raise on the world stage. 🚀 This isn’t just a product launch. It’s a statement that India no longer has to rely on global AI models that were never designed to understand the depth, nuance, and realities of our markets. We can and we will build for ourselves. Artham is shaped by the realities of Indian markets — SEBI’s rulebook, NSE & BSE dynamics, corporate filings, trading cycles, investor sentiment, and the everyday language of Indian finance. Every layer is grounded in local context, built to serve Indian participants, not global assumptions. This isn’t a “global model adapted for India.” Built in India. Hosted in India. Built for India. 🇮🇳 This is a model born from India’s capital markets. At Raise Financial Services, we’ve always believed that true financial empowerment cannot come from imported solutions. It must be created on-ground, in-context, with an Indian-first mindset. Artham is our step towards making Indian finance more intelligent, more relevant, and more accessible for retail investors, traders, institutions, and the next generation of market participants. Behind this launch is a team that stayed obsessed with one thing: relevance. Relevance to the Indian investor. Relevance to the Indian market cycle. Relevance to India’s financial future. This isn’t a concept or a test model. Artham is already live in production for millions of users: • fuzz AI (AI research) • ScanX (markets insights) • Dhan - Made for Trade (trading and investing) Proud of our team. Proud of our mission. Proud to build for India. 🇮🇳 Anirudha Basak Amazon Web Services AWS Cloud India #AWSreInvent2025

shraddha

94,433 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Terence Tao, UCLA mathematics professor and Fields Medallist, on why AI may be succeeding at science while scientists get worse at it: Tao starts by naming the tension directly: "There is this paradox that on the one hand AIs are becoming more powerful and more capable and making fewer mistakes, and they are ostensibly achieving a lot of the goals that we think scientists are trying to do. They're running experiments. They're analyzing data. They're writing papers." Experiments run, data analyzed, papers written — the exact outputs any university or funding body would cite as proof that science is working. Tao's concern is what those outputs stop telling you: "It may be that it comes at the cost of the AI picks up some skill but no human scientist gets any better at doing the science." The skill still accumulates, just in the wrong place. The system gets more capable while the people operating it stand still, because the work that used to build a researcher is now the work being handed off. And the cost shows up in the one thing scientists are supposed to be able to do: "No human can communicate exactly what just happened and why. This scientific discovery is interesting, why this proof is new and what features it has and how it connects." That final clause is the sharp end of it. Tao is describing a result nobody can place — a proof that arrives with no one able to say what makes it new, how it's built, or how it connects to the rest of the field. Understanding is a separate achievement from getting the answer, and it can quietly disappear while the answers keep arriving on schedule. Which is why he thinks the target itself needs re-examining: "We may have to sort of redesign our conception of what science is and what we actually want out of science. What exactly is science for and what are we trying to do? And is there a danger that we are optimizing the wrong thing when we are pointing our AI tools at science?"

Big Brain AI

42,551 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen