Warning: Disturbing content. Drew DeVault (Open Source Dev) & Brodie Robertson (Linux YouTuber) have both been accused of distributing pornographic material depicting children. There's a pattern here. Open Source has a Pedo Problem.
373,151 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
相关视频
![Is Linux a “Pedo Bar”? Put another way: Does the world of Linux and Open Source (including foundations, corporations, and projects) have a disproportionately high level of rapists, pedophiles, and general degenerates? Does Open Source protect such people? And is that by design? Many of the Extreme Leftist Activists within Open Source have regularly attacked anyone who objects to degeneracy — often banning them from organizations entirely, labeling those opposed to degeneracy as “Nazis”. These Leftist Activists say they are trying to stop Open Source from becoming a “Nazi Bar” (a place where Nazis feel safe to congregate) by banning “Nazis”. But, clearly, there are no actual Nazis there (at least not in any significant number). There is no “Nazi Bar” in Open Source. But there is another group that feels extremely safe within Open Source: Rapists, Pedophiles, and general Degenerates. A short anecdote: Many years back (a decade or more), while recording a Linux podcast, I mocked rapists. I made a quick, off-handed remark about how much I despise rapists. About how I felt that anyone who would rape another human being must be truly awful and insane. I did not consider this to be a controversial statement to make. Every good person is opposed to rapists, right? Well… The response, from the Extreme Leftist corners of Open Source, to me being *opposed* to rape, was truly bizarre. For *several* years, those groups regularly protested my involvement in conferences and organizations. Their repeatedly stated reason for protesting me, aggressively, for years? That my position on rapists made them “feel unsafe”. Think that through for a moment. I am opposed to rapists. This made them “feel unsafe”. Why would anyone feel “unsafe” because of someone being *against* rape? Insane, right? The true reason they proclaimed they felt “unsafe” is becoming quite clear. Over the last several years we’ve watched as projects, organizations, and companies have actively promoted sexual degeneracy. Often in criminal form. Microsoft advocating for their employees to give their children (as young as 3) sex changes. Linux Distros using Trans cartoons targeting children: Open Source projects banning anyone who objects to waving the Trans Flag. So many examples. We could list similar stories all day long. Promote degenerate activity, ban anyone who objects. That is the standard operating procedure of so many Open Source organizations. We’ve all been watching it for years. Then, this week we learned about a convicted rapist (who, according to court records, committed “thousands of [sexual] assaults” of little kids) working at Canonical (the parent company of Ubuntu Linux). And being actively involved in GNOME and Ubuntu development. These crimes, according to several sources, were well known. But kept hush-hush. This registered sex offender was not only welcome, but protected (and promoted) within Open Source. The picture is becoming clear. This is what we are seeing within Open Source organizations: - Promote degenerate (often criminal) activities. - Ban and attack any who oppose the degeneracy. - Protect and elevate the degenerates (including convicted rapists of small children). Now, let me ask the question again. Is Linux (and Open Source) a “Pedo Bar”?](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1942626430581629195/amplify_video_thumb/1869098482125991936/img/CstAGNT9fFk5aUCT.jpg)
4:31
Sensitive content
On my ride-along with ICE, we pulled over a woman accused of producing and distributing pornographic content of HER OWN CHILDREN. My heart broke for those kids who will have to one day learn what she did to them. Hopefully when they’re older, they thank the people who took her out of their lives.
Steven Crowder
613,561 次观看 • 4 个月前
![SITUATION EXPLAINED: What happens to open source when the US restricts access to frontier AI models? We asked Adrian Dittmann: "China is releasing these models [open source] to gain international dominance, people will work on these things and say, 'Hey, maybe I can contribute to this if it's open source.' This is the thing that actually gets them talent." "If you're not allowed into the next GPT release or you're not allowed to use Fable, then what are you gonna do? You're stuck with the existing stuff, or you will have to use an open source model that might have subtly better capabilities." "The United States will catch up to open source in some form as well. They seem to just be maximizing product creation." "The problem with open source models is you have to be kind of a nerd in order to use them properly. Consumer facing, the effects will be minimal because the average person doesn't care about open source models. They only care whether or not they can do a quick search with Gemini or ChatGPT."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2070296312504107027/amplify_video_thumb/2070296175820095488/img/m2XxAnBlqgmBMHKv.jpg)
