正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Warren Sharp was asked if John Lynch is a good GM: “It’s very difficult to say that I think that he is. I think that if Brock Purdy does not emerge and I don’t know anybody who could expect Mr. Irrelevant to emerge and become the starting franchise quarterback... show more

Coach Yac 🗣

61,886 subscribers

60,219 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治体育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

absolution 的头像

absolution1 年前

Yeah he only took over a 2-14 team and made the super bowl a few years later.... Oh and drafted -Kittle -Warner -Greenlaw -Dmo -Aiyuk -Deebo -Purdy -Hufanga -Bosa What a clown.

Rishabh B 🐝🤩 的头像

Rishabh B 🐝🤩1 年前

Yeah so all the SB appearance with all different QBs and DLs and OLs don’t mean anything ?

Crazy Duck 的头像

Crazy Duck1 年前

People really have short term memory on where we were at as a franchise in 2017. Honestly a miracle they made a Super Bowl in 2019.

SantaMonicaMM 的头像

SantaMonicaMM1 年前

Absurd take. John Lynch built a Super Bowl team in three years after inheriting the worst roster in football. And he did it while totally whiffing on his first and most valuable draft pick. Now it's all because of Purdy? The guy everyone says was carried by his team? Fool.

Tyler LaRocca 的头像

Tyler LaRocca1 年前

John lynch gets the blame for Kyle’s poor eye for QB talent and development? Damn. Kyle really is a mastermind

Billy_Boy_49 的头像

Billy_Boy_491 年前

49ERS reportedly had the BEST roster in the league in 2022 & 2023…,but Lynch sucks as a GM? Fuck Warren Sharp & his .99 cent PDF NFL book..

Maestro 的头像

Maestro1 年前

I think John L did as fine job taking over a dumpster fire, and getting to a SB two years later, up by 10 pts with 7 min to go in that game . And then rebounding from a horrific 2020 injury riddled season to compete again at the busiest levels. The following drafts of ‘21-23 were not good for sure , and for this reason, Brock saved John and Kyle. But we cannot ignore how the rescued a storied franchise for the depths of hell in 2017 and revived them in 24 just months.

zack 的头像

zack1 年前

I think he’s a tad overrated. This team went from 2020-2023 with zero true impact players in the first 3 rounds. Day 3 has been good but i wish we drafted better. Other than that though, He is a good roster builder

Jeff Scott Fitzgerald 的头像

Jeff Scott Fitzgerald1 年前

Don't hit me with them negative waves so early in the morning.

Coach Yac 🗣 的头像

Coach Yac 🗣1 年前

It’s later in the day where we live 😂

相关视频

Richard Sherman believes Brock Purdy will sit out for at least 3 more weeks to rest his injured toe: “Of course Brock Purdy is still the number one quarterback. Mac Jones understands that. Kyle Shanahan understands that. John Lynch understands that. The outside world needs to understand that. There’s gonna be no QB controversy. I don’t think there’s a chance Brock Purdy is healthy and he’s not the number one quarterback. I think that would be absurd. But do I think this gives the 49ers peace of mind to let Brock Purdy heal in totality and not rush him back like they had to do in the Jaguars game? No question about it. I think he sits for at least 3 or 4 more weeks just because of how irritated it got after that game. You don’t want to have those issues lingering through the playoffs.” 🎥: Richard Sherman

Richard Sherman believes Brock Purdy will sit out for at least 3 more weeks to rest his injured toe: “Of course Brock Purdy is still the number one quarterback. Mac Jones understands that. Kyle Shanahan understands that. John Lynch understands that. The outside world needs to understand that. There’s gonna be no QB controversy. I don’t think there’s a chance Brock Purdy is healthy and he’s not the number one quarterback. I think that would be absurd. But do I think this gives the 49ers peace of mind to let Brock Purdy heal in totality and not rush him back like they had to do in the Jaguars game? No question about it. I think he sits for at least 3 or 4 more weeks just because of how irritated it got after that game. You don’t want to have those issues lingering through the playoffs.” 🎥: Richard Sherman

Coach Yac 🗣

74,277 次观看 • 9 个月前

Danny Kanell with high praise for Brock Purdy: “I think Brock Purdy gets such a hard time because he was Mr. Irrelevant, because he was a seventh rounder. It’s like he has to prove it doubly as much as anybody else to overcome that label of not being a first rounder. If he was a first rounder I don’t think we would be having this conversation and he would have already inked that big deal. I think he makes this season for the 49ers. I think they are back in the playoffs and Brock Purdy continues to show people that’s he more than just a game manager.” via: NFL on CBS 🏈

Danny Kanell with high praise for Brock Purdy: “I think Brock Purdy gets such a hard time because he was Mr. Irrelevant, because he was a seventh rounder. It’s like he has to prove it doubly as much as anybody else to overcome that label of not being a first rounder. If he was a first rounder I don’t think we would be having this conversation and he would have already inked that big deal. I think he makes this season for the 49ers. I think they are back in the playoffs and Brock Purdy continues to show people that’s he more than just a game manager.” via: NFL on CBS 🏈

Coach Yac 🗣

35,867 次观看 • 1 年前

Warren Sharp on John Lynch’s drafting over the years: “I know some 49ers fans are going to say they win a lot of games, so he must be drafting well. No. They win in spite of Lynch. Their 3 biggest on field contributors to wins the last several years have been Trent Williams, Christian McCaffrey and Brock Purdy. He got Trent because Dan Snyder pissed him off. CMC was a trade and Purdy was Mr Irrelevant, but after the draft, Lynch gave the credit to the Purdy pick to Brian Griese and scout Steve Slowik. Those 3 players combined with the coaching of Kyle Shanahan are leading the 49ers to wins. In fact, I would turn this argument on its head and say the 49ers have been close to winning, but still haven’t won a Super Bowl because they have drafted so poorly.” My biggest takeaway from the video other than Sharp destroying Lynch is that Kyle Shanahan doesn’t get any of the blame for several poor drafts and decisions — the trade up to get Lance — since 2021 🎥: Warren Sharp

Warren Sharp on John Lynch’s drafting over the years: “I know some 49ers fans are going to say they win a lot of games, so he must be drafting well. No. They win in spite of Lynch. Their 3 biggest on field contributors to wins the last several years have been Trent Williams, Christian McCaffrey and Brock Purdy. He got Trent because Dan Snyder pissed him off. CMC was a trade and Purdy was Mr Irrelevant, but after the draft, Lynch gave the credit to the Purdy pick to Brian Griese and scout Steve Slowik. Those 3 players combined with the coaching of Kyle Shanahan are leading the 49ers to wins. In fact, I would turn this argument on its head and say the 49ers have been close to winning, but still haven’t won a Super Bowl because they have drafted so poorly.” My biggest takeaway from the video other than Sharp destroying Lynch is that Kyle Shanahan doesn’t get any of the blame for several poor drafts and decisions — the trade up to get Lance — since 2021 🎥: Warren Sharp

Coach Yac 🗣

126,272 次观看 • 2 个月前

Yikes: 49ers GM John Lynch reveals that he is using AI to scout players and help in the draft process. “Yeah. A lot. Just like the rest of the world. I think if you aren’t using it, you’re already behind. … Just like you at home planning a travel itinerary—you can just ask the thing, and it can spit out pretty good things. Some pretty good ideas.” 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

Yikes: 49ers GM John Lynch reveals that he is using AI to scout players and help in the draft process. “Yeah. A lot. Just like the rest of the world. I think if you aren’t using it, you’re already behind. … Just like you at home planning a travel itinerary—you can just ask the thing, and it can spit out pretty good things. Some pretty good ideas.” 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

Dov Kleiman

33,806 次观看 • 2 个月前

Kurt Warner was asked if Joe Burrow wants out of Cincinnati, should the 49ers trade for him: “That’s a tough question. You know I love Brock Purdy and I think Brock’s really good, but I also do believe Joe is better than Brock is and brings more to the table. If that were the case you’d probably have 28 teams in the league that would say Joe Burrow would be an upgrade at the quarterback spot. That’s not a knock any of these other guys. It’s just Joe is one of the special ones.” 🎥: 95.7 The Game

Kurt Warner was asked if Joe Burrow wants out of Cincinnati, should the 49ers trade for him: “That’s a tough question. You know I love Brock Purdy and I think Brock’s really good, but I also do believe Joe is better than Brock is and brings more to the table. If that were the case you’d probably have 28 teams in the league that would say Joe Burrow would be an upgrade at the quarterback spot. That’s not a knock any of these other guys. It’s just Joe is one of the special ones.” 🎥: 95.7 The Game

Coach Yac 🗣

457,268 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: When asked about President Trump's successor... he first and foremost names VP JD VANCE for 2028. "It's far too early to say that, but I do have a vice president and typically would be - and JD's doing a fantastic job." "It could very well be. I don't want to get involved in that. I think he's a fantastic, brilliant guy. Marco [Rubio] is great. There's a lot of them that are great I also see tremendous unity. But certainly you would say that somebody's VP, if that person is outstanding, I guess that person would have an advantage."

🚨 BREAKING: When asked about President Trump's successor... he first and foremost names VP JD VANCE for 2028. "It's far too early to say that, but I do have a vice president and typically would be - and JD's doing a fantastic job." "It could very well be. I don't want to get involved in that. I think he's a fantastic, brilliant guy. Marco [Rubio] is great. There's a lot of them that are great I also see tremendous unity. But certainly you would say that somebody's VP, if that person is outstanding, I guess that person would have an advantage."

Eric Daugherty

770,578 次观看 • 1 年前

Trump: I think it’s very sad, actually. I’m surprised that it wasn’t—you know—the public wasn’t notified a long time ago, because to get to stage 9, that’s a long time. I just had my physical. You saw that. You saw the results of that particular test. I think that test is standard to pretty much anybody getting a physical—a good physical. We had the doctors at the White House and over at Walter Reed, which is a fantastic hospital, do it. I did a very complete physical, including a cognitive test. I’m proud to announce I aced it. I got them all right. You proud of me? Your husband would be proud of me for getting them all right. It’s a little risk. If I didn’t get them all right, these people would be after me. It would be not a good situation. But I think, frankly, anybody running for president should take a cognitive test. They say it’s unconstitutional, but I would say in that particular case, having a cognitive test wouldn’t be so bad. But when you take tests—medical, as a male—that test is very standard. I don’t know if it’s given to everybody, but it’s given just about. And it takes a long time to get to that situation… to get to a stage 9. I think that if you take a look, it’s the same doctor that said that Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. If it’s the same doctor, he said there was nothing wrong there. That’s been proven to be a sad situation. And the autopen is becoming a very big deal. You know, the autopen is becoming a big deal because it seems that maybe it was the president—whoever operated the autopen. But when they say that was not good, they also—you have to look and you have to say that the test was not so good either. In other words, there are things going on that the public wasn’t informed [about], and I think somebody is going to have to speak to his doctor—if it’s the same or even if it’s two separate doctors. Why wasn’t the cognitive ability—why wasn’t that discussed? And I think the doctor said he’s just fine, and it’s turned out that’s not so. It’s very dangerous… this is dangerous for our country. Look at the mess we are in. You talk about all these questions on Ukraine and Russia. That would’ve never happened, as an example, if I were president. It would’ve never happened. The other thing—you have to say: Why did it take so long? I mean, this takes a long time. It can take years to get to this level of danger. It’s a very, very sad situation. I feel very badly about it. And I think people should try and find out what happened. Because I’ll tell you, I don’t know if it had anything to do with the hospital. Walter Reed is really good. They’re some of the best doctors I’ve ever seen. I don’t even know if they were involved. But a doctor was involved in each case. Maybe it was the same doctor. And somebody is not telling the facts. That’s a big problem.

Trump: I think it’s very sad, actually. I’m surprised that it wasn’t—you know—the public wasn’t notified a long time ago, because to get to stage 9, that’s a long time. I just had my physical. You saw that. You saw the results of that particular test. I think that test is standard to pretty much anybody getting a physical—a good physical. We had the doctors at the White House and over at Walter Reed, which is a fantastic hospital, do it. I did a very complete physical, including a cognitive test. I’m proud to announce I aced it. I got them all right. You proud of me? Your husband would be proud of me for getting them all right. It’s a little risk. If I didn’t get them all right, these people would be after me. It would be not a good situation. But I think, frankly, anybody running for president should take a cognitive test. They say it’s unconstitutional, but I would say in that particular case, having a cognitive test wouldn’t be so bad. But when you take tests—medical, as a male—that test is very standard. I don’t know if it’s given to everybody, but it’s given just about. And it takes a long time to get to that situation… to get to a stage 9. I think that if you take a look, it’s the same doctor that said that Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. If it’s the same doctor, he said there was nothing wrong there. That’s been proven to be a sad situation. And the autopen is becoming a very big deal. You know, the autopen is becoming a big deal because it seems that maybe it was the president—whoever operated the autopen. But when they say that was not good, they also—you have to look and you have to say that the test was not so good either. In other words, there are things going on that the public wasn’t informed [about], and I think somebody is going to have to speak to his doctor—if it’s the same or even if it’s two separate doctors. Why wasn’t the cognitive ability—why wasn’t that discussed? And I think the doctor said he’s just fine, and it’s turned out that’s not so. It’s very dangerous… this is dangerous for our country. Look at the mess we are in. You talk about all these questions on Ukraine and Russia. That would’ve never happened, as an example, if I were president. It would’ve never happened. The other thing—you have to say: Why did it take so long? I mean, this takes a long time. It can take years to get to this level of danger. It’s a very, very sad situation. I feel very badly about it. And I think people should try and find out what happened. Because I’ll tell you, I don’t know if it had anything to do with the hospital. Walter Reed is really good. They’re some of the best doctors I’ve ever seen. I don’t even know if they were involved. But a doctor was involved in each case. Maybe it was the same doctor. And somebody is not telling the facts. That’s a big problem.

Acyn

656,574 次观看 • 1 年前

CNN's Van Jones was not a fan of Zohran Mamdani's angry, far-left, rage-filled victory speech: "I think he missed an opportunity. I think the Mamdani that we saw in the campaign trail, who was a lot more calm, who was a lot warmer, who was a lot more embracing, was not present in that speech. And I think that Mamdani is the one you need to hear from tonight. There are a lot of people trying to figure out, can I get on this train with him or not? Is he going to include me? Is he going -- is he -- is he going to be more of a class warrior even in office? I think he missed a chance tonight to to open up and bring more people into the tent. I think his tone was sharp. I think he was using the microphone in a way that he was almost yelling. And that's not the Mamdani that we've seen on Tiktok and the great interviews and stuff like that." "So, I felt like it was a little bit of a character switch here, where the warm, open, embracing guy that's close to working people was not on stage tonight. And there were some some other voice on stage. That said, he's very young. And he just pulled off something very, very difficult. And I wouldn't write him off, but I think he missed an opportunity to open himself up tonight. And I think that that will probably cost him going forward."

CNN's Van Jones was not a fan of Zohran Mamdani's angry, far-left, rage-filled victory speech: "I think he missed an opportunity. I think the Mamdani that we saw in the campaign trail, who was a lot more calm, who was a lot warmer, who was a lot more embracing, was not present in that speech. And I think that Mamdani is the one you need to hear from tonight. There are a lot of people trying to figure out, can I get on this train with him or not? Is he going to include me? Is he going -- is he -- is he going to be more of a class warrior even in office? I think he missed a chance tonight to to open up and bring more people into the tent. I think his tone was sharp. I think he was using the microphone in a way that he was almost yelling. And that's not the Mamdani that we've seen on Tiktok and the great interviews and stuff like that." "So, I felt like it was a little bit of a character switch here, where the warm, open, embracing guy that's close to working people was not on stage tonight. And there were some some other voice on stage. That said, he's very young. And he just pulled off something very, very difficult. And I wouldn't write him off, but I think he missed an opportunity to open himself up tonight. And I think that that will probably cost him going forward."

Curtis Houck

6,102,201 次观看 • 8 个月前

President Trump on the potential indictment of James Comey: “I’m not making that determination. I think I’d be allowed to get involved if I want, but I don’t really choose to do so. I can only say that Comey is a bad person. He’s a sick person. I think he’s a sick guy, actually. He did terrible things at the FBI, but I don’t know. I have no idea what’s gonna happen.” Interesting that he said he is allowed to get involved if he wants. DO IT!

President Trump on the potential indictment of James Comey: “I’m not making that determination. I think I’d be allowed to get involved if I want, but I don’t really choose to do so. I can only say that Comey is a bad person. He’s a sick person. I think he’s a sick guy, actually. He did terrible things at the FBI, but I don’t know. I have no idea what’s gonna happen.” Interesting that he said he is allowed to get involved if he wants. DO IT!

TheStormHasArrived

33,566 次观看 • 9 个月前

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,595 次观看 • 1 个月前

I will continue to participate in the song production a lot. It is my job and my music. I think that if I do it myself and get the results so that you can understand the song, it will be more convincing and you will like it. And if I do that, I think you will be proud of me.

I will continue to participate in the song production a lot. It is my job and my music. I think that if I do it myself and get the results so that you can understand the song, it will be more convincing and you will like it. And if I do that, I think you will be proud of me.

아란

67,173 次观看 • 11 个月前

“one of us” director stefan van de graaff describes kit connor’s talent, humility, and grounded personality: zach randles-friedman: “is there anything that surprised you about kit connor, that whenever you were working with him that you were just like you hadn't, you didn't expect that?” stefan van de graaff: “yeah, this is insane. when we cast kit, it was a week and a half before we filmed, and the film is very dialogue heavy and it's written in free verse, so everything is, it's almost like pseudo kind of faux shakespearean, very performative language by design. and he stepped into this role where he's basically in every single scene and he's basically talking the entire movie.” zach: “yeah.” stefan: “he, i don't recall him missing a line.” zach: “wow.” stefan: “i don't know how he did it. i was just telling people at a, at a screener, a private screener the other night, it was like a superhuman, it was like witnessing a miracle. i don't know how he did it. he would go and he would memorize the next five pages of material the night before and he would come and he wouldn't miss a line. and that's just like, it's not normal, especially not normal for a, a script like this. so that was one thing is that he is insanely gifted. it's not just like he's one of those guys that gets, you know, yes, he's like incredibly handsome and charismatic and all those things, and there's a lot of those that kind of crawl through the ranks on, you know, on the merit of being beautiful. he is not that—or he's also that, let's say. he is also just incredibly talented in a way that i'm like, i, i, i don't know how you did that. he's also a lot taller than you might think.” zach: “how tall is he?” stefan: “he's over six feet.” zach: “oh, i did not, i thought he was like 5’8.” stefan: “no, no, no, he's, he's 6 foot, 6’1 probably. i'm 6’2 and he's, he's, he's not a small guy.” zach: “wow, that does surprise me actually, because he looks so short on tv.” stefan: “yeah, you watch heartstopper and he looks like, i think he just looks small and whatever. he's not, he's and, and then obviously he's gotten very, he's lifted a lot for a number of roles and stuff, and so like, he's big, like he's, he's a, yeah. he's a big guy and is also just incredibly, he is also real people. he is just like, you'll, he has no pretentiousness about him, just humble as can be. he's from like a small kind of borough of london. and he's just, he's just a remarkable person, really calm, really just like even-keeled, steady guy. i don't, i don't think that there's a person who, if they met him, that they couldn't like kit. i think that he's, he's just one of those types of people that you're just like, that's, that's a great person.” zach: “i love it that he's not, i love it that the fame didn't go to his head because i, there's a couple of people that just made it really big and one of them, i think it, i see them how they're acting now with like paparazzi and stuff, and i think that the fame has gone to their head, the way that they're acting now, and it's, it makes me kind of sad.” stefan: “i don't think that will ever happen with kit because i think that he will hide himself before that starts to happen. like he would sooner disappear and like act in one movie every couple of years and you're like, “where did that guy go?” than he would ever start to let that go—i would be shocked if he ever went that way, from what i know of him.” zach: “well he's been out, he's been there long enough, though if that was going to happen, i think it would have happened already too, because he's famous enough.” stefan: “absolutely.” zach: “yeah.” stefan: “and he's so young that it's like, my brain like wasn't fully formed at his age, and so for him to be behaving the way that he is as young as he is, i'm like, ok, well, it, in 10 years from now, you're not going to be any more susceptible to giving into the ego than he is today. so i think that he is like, yeah, he's a, he's a sure bet if, if, if you're gambling on what actor is going to be around for a long time and is going to have just like a really prolific career of incredible pieces of work, i—and i feel like i can say this because it was no genius on my part or anything that got him, we got really lucky to get him—and so i feel like i can comfortably say like almost as like a, as a fly on the wall in the room with him, just being very fortunate to work with him, that like he's, he's going to go really, really far and he deserves every little bit of success.” 🔗:

“one of us” director stefan van de graaff describes kit connor’s talent, humility, and grounded personality: zach randles-friedman: “is there anything that surprised you about kit connor, that whenever you were working with him that you were just like you hadn't, you didn't expect that?” stefan van de graaff: “yeah, this is insane. when we cast kit, it was a week and a half before we filmed, and the film is very dialogue heavy and it's written in free verse, so everything is, it's almost like pseudo kind of faux shakespearean, very performative language by design. and he stepped into this role where he's basically in every single scene and he's basically talking the entire movie.” zach: “yeah.” stefan: “he, i don't recall him missing a line.” zach: “wow.” stefan: “i don't know how he did it. i was just telling people at a, at a screener, a private screener the other night, it was like a superhuman, it was like witnessing a miracle. i don't know how he did it. he would go and he would memorize the next five pages of material the night before and he would come and he wouldn't miss a line. and that's just like, it's not normal, especially not normal for a, a script like this. so that was one thing is that he is insanely gifted. it's not just like he's one of those guys that gets, you know, yes, he's like incredibly handsome and charismatic and all those things, and there's a lot of those that kind of crawl through the ranks on, you know, on the merit of being beautiful. he is not that—or he's also that, let's say. he is also just incredibly talented in a way that i'm like, i, i, i don't know how you did that. he's also a lot taller than you might think.” zach: “how tall is he?” stefan: “he's over six feet.” zach: “oh, i did not, i thought he was like 5’8.” stefan: “no, no, no, he's, he's 6 foot, 6’1 probably. i'm 6’2 and he's, he's, he's not a small guy.” zach: “wow, that does surprise me actually, because he looks so short on tv.” stefan: “yeah, you watch heartstopper and he looks like, i think he just looks small and whatever. he's not, he's and, and then obviously he's gotten very, he's lifted a lot for a number of roles and stuff, and so like, he's big, like he's, he's a, yeah. he's a big guy and is also just incredibly, he is also real people. he is just like, you'll, he has no pretentiousness about him, just humble as can be. he's from like a small kind of borough of london. and he's just, he's just a remarkable person, really calm, really just like even-keeled, steady guy. i don't, i don't think that there's a person who, if they met him, that they couldn't like kit. i think that he's, he's just one of those types of people that you're just like, that's, that's a great person.” zach: “i love it that he's not, i love it that the fame didn't go to his head because i, there's a couple of people that just made it really big and one of them, i think it, i see them how they're acting now with like paparazzi and stuff, and i think that the fame has gone to their head, the way that they're acting now, and it's, it makes me kind of sad.” stefan: “i don't think that will ever happen with kit because i think that he will hide himself before that starts to happen. like he would sooner disappear and like act in one movie every couple of years and you're like, “where did that guy go?” than he would ever start to let that go—i would be shocked if he ever went that way, from what i know of him.” zach: “well he's been out, he's been there long enough, though if that was going to happen, i think it would have happened already too, because he's famous enough.” stefan: “absolutely.” zach: “yeah.” stefan: “and he's so young that it's like, my brain like wasn't fully formed at his age, and so for him to be behaving the way that he is as young as he is, i'm like, ok, well, it, in 10 years from now, you're not going to be any more susceptible to giving into the ego than he is today. so i think that he is like, yeah, he's a, he's a sure bet if, if, if you're gambling on what actor is going to be around for a long time and is going to have just like a really prolific career of incredible pieces of work, i—and i feel like i can say this because it was no genius on my part or anything that got him, we got really lucky to get him—and so i feel like i can comfortably say like almost as like a, as a fly on the wall in the room with him, just being very fortunate to work with him, that like he's, he's going to go really, really far and he deserves every little bit of success.” 🔗:

kit connor updates

26,996 次观看 • 2 个月前

Asmongold on why he hasn't commented much on Denims’ lawsuit and why he hopes she loses "I hope she doesn't win..I didn't really talk about that bc I don't know what the ramifications are..and the only ppl posting about it were the usual glazer accounts so I'm like ok is this legitimate or not..but I think that she should lose" "If u upload somebody else's content with the express and stated goal of trying to deprive that person from revenue, I think that just that on its own..should be grounds for it not to be fair use..fair use is explicitly not being a market alternative and if she is stating that it is a market alternative, then I don't know how anybody could say that's fair use" "That's not a win for anybody if she wins that case..at that point, it says that effectively u can react to and upload another YT video, say that ur doing it to take views away from the creator..fundamentally it was malicious, what she did” “So no I don't want to see somebody win and get off free for something that they literally admitted was malicious..idk why anybody's thinking that's a good thing"

Asmongold on why he hasn't commented much on Denims’ lawsuit and why he hopes she loses "I hope she doesn't win..I didn't really talk about that bc I don't know what the ramifications are..and the only ppl posting about it were the usual glazer accounts so I'm like ok is this legitimate or not..but I think that she should lose" "If u upload somebody else's content with the express and stated goal of trying to deprive that person from revenue, I think that just that on its own..should be grounds for it not to be fair use..fair use is explicitly not being a market alternative and if she is stating that it is a market alternative, then I don't know how anybody could say that's fair use" "That's not a win for anybody if she wins that case..at that point, it says that effectively u can react to and upload another YT video, say that ur doing it to take views away from the creator..fundamentally it was malicious, what she did” “So no I don't want to see somebody win and get off free for something that they literally admitted was malicious..idk why anybody's thinking that's a good thing"

yeet

54,053 次观看 • 1 个月前

THE DUMBEST TAKE OF ALL TIME: Mike Florio says Brock Purdy is NOT The #49ers franchise QB because his name is to close to TURDY🤯 “Brock Purdy is just kind of a weird name, it doesn’t sound like a franchise quarterback name, Purdy is a little to close to TURDY” “I think people have a hard time looking at that name and saying that’s a franchise quarterback”

THE DUMBEST TAKE OF ALL TIME: Mike Florio says Brock Purdy is NOT The #49ers franchise QB because his name is to close to TURDY🤯 “Brock Purdy is just kind of a weird name, it doesn’t sound like a franchise quarterback name, Purdy is a little to close to TURDY” “I think people have a hard time looking at that name and saying that’s a franchise quarterback”

MLFootball

726,576 次观看 • 2 年前

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:

Yujin Ha

110,072 次观看 • 3 天前