Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

was actually there last night, so reading the headlines this morning was honestly frustrating. What I saw in that room, the support, the vote, the energy, does not match how it’s being framed today. You don’t have to agree with someone to notice when coverage feels selective. We’re heading...

35,926 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says Silicon Valley is still underestimating AI and it’s disproportionately hurting democrats: “If you’re going to disrupt the economic and political power of the democrat base— and you believe that’s going to work out politically— you're in an insane asylum.” “This technology disrupts humanities-trained, largely democratic voters, and makes their economic power, less. And increases the power of vocationally trained, working class (often male) voters.” “These disruptions are going to disrupt every aspect of our society.” “To make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology, and how we’re going to explain to people who are likely going to have less good, and less interesting jobs from their perspective…” “These technologies are dangerous societally. The only justification you could possibly have is— if we don’t do it, our adversaries will, and we’ll be subject to their rule of law.” “If you decouple this from the support of the military, you’re going to have an enormous problem explaining to be American people— why is it we’re observing the risk of disrupting the very fabric of our society, if it’s not because it’s about maintaining our ability to be American?” “If you don’t believe it— look at the battlefield. What do you think the Chinese and Russians are saying about what they’re seeing on the battlefield right now? They’re not saying this is some incremental technology.” “They’re saying, ‘Wait— the last time we saw America fight it was Afghanistan and nothing worked.’”

Jawwwn

66,645 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Pavel Durov on why he hasn't had depression in 20 years: "I normally never have depression. I don't remember having depression in the last 20 years, at least maybe when I was a teenager." Pavel's approach to difficult emotions is completely counterintuitive. As he puts it: "I'm a human being like everybody else. I do get to experience emotions and some of them are not very pleasant. But I believe that it's the responsibility of every one of us to cope with these emotions and to learn to work through them." On what creates depression: "Self-discipline is particularly important because without it, how can you overcome this seemingly endless loop of negativity or despair that ultimately leads to depression for some people?" His method: "One of the reasons I don't have depression is I start doing things. I identify the problem, I can see a solution, and I start executing the strategy. If you are stuck in this loop of being worried about something, nothing's ever going to change." The mistake people make: "People often make this mistake thinking 'Oh, I should just have some rest and then regain energy.' This is not how it works. You gain energy by doing something. So you start doing something, then it happens. You feel motivated, you feel inspired, and then ultimately you do something else a little bit more." He continues: "The whole point is to do first and then feel, not feel and then do. Going to the gym is a good example. There are many days when you don't want to start working out. But you have to overcome this initial reluctance and then you get to a point that you enjoy it and you think 'Oh my god, it was such a good idea to come to gym today.'" Action creates energy, not the other way around.

Jaynit

547,702 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

This is: Joe Oltmann: “I met with NSA guys. I met with ODNI people. I met with lawyers. I met with guys who said, ‘How did you get this information?’ Mapped out how Dominion Rigging Systems overthrows governments, including right here in the U.S. “I said, okay, let me dig into Dominion. Can they actually steal an election? Then I was like, wait, we have a Georgia runoff — a race for a Senate seat. And then I built the model, and I was like, they’re going to steal it. Here’s how they’re going to do it. I mathematically mapped out how they were going to steal the election, and I went to Washington. And then it happened exactly the way I said it would happen.” “I met with NSA guys. I met with ODNI people. I met with lawyers. I met with guys who said, ‘How did you get this information?’ I said, ‘Well, I went through and mapped all the RFPs, RFQs, manuals — everything I had for Dominion. And I worked backward to determine what the vulnerabilities would be. Then I looked statistically at what happened on November 3rd. And I said, okay, in this runoff election, the Democrats are going to take both seats. And here’s how they’re going to do it: they’re going to flip it, and the vote is going to come down. It’s going to come back up. I literally told them exactly what was going to happen. I went to meet with Pompeo’s (CIA Director) counsel. Pompeo was supposed to be there, and I was in a SCIF at the State Department when everything happened at the Capitol briefing. And he looked up at me, and he’s sweating in a room that is very cool. And I’m like, ‘Oh, crap — he knows.’ And that’s how I knew it was an inside job.” 📝 In other words, the CIA toppled the U.S. government on November 3, 2020.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

164,005 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce