Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Was it just me, or did Barack Obama seem very passive-aggressive while lecturing us on how the Founders "fell short?" And I love how he threw in that the Founders only let "white men who owned property" vote. Because it proves that he has NO IDEA what he's talking... show more

Glenn Beck

2,278,249 subscribers

654,503 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Milo Yiannopoulos “It doesn't matter if you agree with the literal truth of Christianity or not, the founders did and they made a country for people who did” “If you don't agree with that — you don't appreciate that we should not only restore Christianity in culture, but require it in public life, you should go to Canada.” This whole speech is 🔥

Milo Yiannopoulos “It doesn't matter if you agree with the literal truth of Christianity or not, the founders did and they made a country for people who did” “If you don't agree with that — you don't appreciate that we should not only restore Christianity in culture, but require it in public life, you should go to Canada.” This whole speech is 🔥

Wall Street Apes

1,787,602 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Keith Rabois: “I tell founders not to worry about runway. Worry about lift.” “If you think about lift in a plane context, a company is only valuable if you achieve lift. Runway is a tactic for achieving lift, and you may need to extend the runway so that you have more time to get lift. But unless you’re actually achieving lift with that extra time, it doesn’t help you.” Keith continues: “I hate when a founder is like, ‘I want to raise this much money because it gives me two years runway.’… That is a stupid way to think about your fundraising.” Instead, founders should ask themselves what they need to achieve to achieve lift, and then work backwards from that. When Keith invests at Khosla Ventures and Founders Fund, they write internal memos about the three key risks to the company. Usually you can’t achieve all three in one financing, so founders should be asking themselves, What’s the most important inflection? And then structure their financing to achieve that. Keith advises founders that it’s ok to let their runway go very low if they feel like they’re approaching lift: “A lot of founders get very bad advice like ‘Oh, you need to have this much runway or you won’t be able to raise money from strength.’ That’s nonsense. If you have traction - if you hit a viral coefficient of 1 with three months of runway - almost every VC on the planet knows how to invest in that company, and it will not be a problem.” Video source: Khosla Ventures (2024)

Keith Rabois: “I tell founders not to worry about runway. Worry about lift.” “If you think about lift in a plane context, a company is only valuable if you achieve lift. Runway is a tactic for achieving lift, and you may need to extend the runway so that you have more time to get lift. But unless you’re actually achieving lift with that extra time, it doesn’t help you.” Keith continues: “I hate when a founder is like, ‘I want to raise this much money because it gives me two years runway.’… That is a stupid way to think about your fundraising.” Instead, founders should ask themselves what they need to achieve to achieve lift, and then work backwards from that. When Keith invests at Khosla Ventures and Founders Fund, they write internal memos about the three key risks to the company. Usually you can’t achieve all three in one financing, so founders should be asking themselves, What’s the most important inflection? And then structure their financing to achieve that. Keith advises founders that it’s ok to let their runway go very low if they feel like they’re approaching lift: “A lot of founders get very bad advice like ‘Oh, you need to have this much runway or you won’t be able to raise money from strength.’ That’s nonsense. If you have traction - if you hit a viral coefficient of 1 with three months of runway - almost every VC on the planet knows how to invest in that company, and it will not be a problem.” Video source: Khosla Ventures (2024)

Startup Archive

256,038 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

"If you are denying gender-affirming care and forcing a trans child to go through puberty, that is tantamount to torture, and this body should be ashamed. If you vote yes on this bill, I hope the next time you bow your heads in prayer, you see the blood on your hands."

"If you are denying gender-affirming care and forcing a trans child to go through puberty, that is tantamount to torture, and this body should be ashamed. If you vote yes on this bill, I hope the next time you bow your heads in prayer, you see the blood on your hands."

Rep. Zooey Zephyr

1,108,812 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Most founders underestimate what a real community does for you. It's not the events, the group chats, or the name in your bio. It's who you meet. The founder who saves you six months because they already ran the exact play you're about to try. The introduction that becomes your next hire. The dinner conversation that reshapes how you think about the business you've been building for five years. You can't engineer that on your own. You can only put yourself in rooms where it becomes likely. That's what the right community unlocks. That's what we've built at The Founders Club.

Most founders underestimate what a real community does for you. It's not the events, the group chats, or the name in your bio. It's who you meet. The founder who saves you six months because they already ran the exact play you're about to try. The introduction that becomes your next hire. The dinner conversation that reshapes how you think about the business you've been building for five years. You can't engineer that on your own. You can only put yourself in rooms where it becomes likely. That's what the right community unlocks. That's what we've built at The Founders Club.

The Founders Club

52,270 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

WATCH: Pastor Mark Driscoll just issued a powerful message calling out "Never Trump Pastors" for abandoning Biblical values by not voting for Trump "If you think that the government is the solution, you should vote Democrat. If you think that the government is the problem, you should vote Republican." - Pastor Mark Driscoll That was an excellent breakdown. I would also add that if we just get 2-3 million out of the 31 million Christians who aren't voting to vote, that would be a GAME CHANGER.

WATCH: Pastor Mark Driscoll just issued a powerful message calling out "Never Trump Pastors" for abandoning Biblical values by not voting for Trump "If you think that the government is the solution, you should vote Democrat. If you think that the government is the problem, you should vote Republican." - Pastor Mark Driscoll That was an excellent breakdown. I would also add that if we just get 2-3 million out of the 31 million Christians who aren't voting to vote, that would be a GAME CHANGER.

George

125,252 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What another AMAZING “coincidence” California had just passed new tax laws, if your home burns down and you don’t rebuild within 2 years (impossible in California) you lose your tax basis. Your property taxes SKYROCKET to the new values of the property “Think about a home that was purchased many years ago for $5 million. Let's say they were paying $65,000 a year in property taxes. Property goes up a lot over time, especially in these areas. Maybe the value today is $30 million. They go to rebuild it. If it was not, if they couldn't transfer the tax basis, you're looking at like $400,000 a year that they would have to pay” “In 2020, California voters approved a bill that basically said that if your house burns down in a fire, you can transfer the tax basis of that property to something that you buy or something that you build. But you only have two years to do it.” So some of the most expensive homes and properties the entire world now will get reassessed to pay maximum property tax values….

What another AMAZING “coincidence” California had just passed new tax laws, if your home burns down and you don’t rebuild within 2 years (impossible in California) you lose your tax basis. Your property taxes SKYROCKET to the new values of the property “Think about a home that was purchased many years ago for $5 million. Let's say they were paying $65,000 a year in property taxes. Property goes up a lot over time, especially in these areas. Maybe the value today is $30 million. They go to rebuild it. If it was not, if they couldn't transfer the tax basis, you're looking at like $400,000 a year that they would have to pay” “In 2020, California voters approved a bill that basically said that if your house burns down in a fire, you can transfer the tax basis of that property to something that you buy or something that you build. But you only have two years to do it.” So some of the most expensive homes and properties the entire world now will get reassessed to pay maximum property tax values….

Wall Street Apes

3,035,819 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman: “No matter how great your idea is, no one cares.” Sam is asked what a founder should do if they have an idea but don’t want to talk about it because a big company might steal it. He responds: “Here is one of the things that takes founders a long time to learn: No matter how great your idea is, no one cares. Everybody is so distracted that you could probably put that idea with exact instructions for how to implement it on Tim Cook’s desk and take no risk.” Sam continues: “Extreme secrecy among founders is a bad sign. You want to keep some things secret for sure, but you should be willing to talk about the broad sketches of what you’re doing because you need that to recruit people, to get investors, to get customers.” Talking about your idea is also how you get feedback from other really smart people. Sam gives his own experience with Y Combinator as an example: “We at YC talk about everything we do. We talk about how to operate. We give our best possible advice. I have given talks before to rooms of people that want to start accelerators. And I say: ‘If you want to start an accelerator, here is exactly what to do step by step, and here are the mistakes to avoid step by step.’ And people always say, ‘Are you crazy? You’re giving away YC secrets.’ And we are, and yet no one ever listens… It was hard for me to learn this lesson of not fearing this… But don’t be afraid of telling people what you do.”

Sam Altman: “No matter how great your idea is, no one cares.” Sam is asked what a founder should do if they have an idea but don’t want to talk about it because a big company might steal it. He responds: “Here is one of the things that takes founders a long time to learn: No matter how great your idea is, no one cares. Everybody is so distracted that you could probably put that idea with exact instructions for how to implement it on Tim Cook’s desk and take no risk.” Sam continues: “Extreme secrecy among founders is a bad sign. You want to keep some things secret for sure, but you should be willing to talk about the broad sketches of what you’re doing because you need that to recruit people, to get investors, to get customers.” Talking about your idea is also how you get feedback from other really smart people. Sam gives his own experience with Y Combinator as an example: “We at YC talk about everything we do. We talk about how to operate. We give our best possible advice. I have given talks before to rooms of people that want to start accelerators. And I say: ‘If you want to start an accelerator, here is exactly what to do step by step, and here are the mistakes to avoid step by step.’ And people always say, ‘Are you crazy? You’re giving away YC secrets.’ And we are, and yet no one ever listens… It was hard for me to learn this lesson of not fearing this… But don’t be afraid of telling people what you do.”

Startup Archive

212,842 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

259,092 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Tinubu said: '...why should I make laws that favour free and fair election, if you don't want to vote don't vote. Who say you must vote. You can sleep in your house that day. If only three people that vote for me, I win." If you take a letter to INEC, they would call Villa. If they say don't collect they won't collect and if they ask them to collect they would collect because INEC is controlled from Aso Rock" - Prince Adeboyo

"Tinubu said: '...why should I make laws that favour free and fair election, if you don't want to vote don't vote. Who say you must vote. You can sleep in your house that day. If only three people that vote for me, I win." If you take a letter to INEC, they would call Villa. If they say don't collect they won't collect and if they ask them to collect they would collect because INEC is controlled from Aso Rock" - Prince Adeboyo

DonAza

130,020 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.Christopher C. Cuomo on "lefties" downplaying the Trump assassination attempt: "That's exactly why you lost the election. You are out of touch. You lost the plot about how people feel in the majority. That's what you did, and that was a perfect example of it, that situation. 'Oh, I think it was just a teleprompter.' You would have never assessed it that way if you didn't wish the guy had died. How f*cked up up is that? That you wished he had died? That you play down that he was shot at? It was disgusting. And I, for one, felt a measure of satisfaction that you were punished for it politically because there is no place for that." Daily Caller

.Christopher C. Cuomo on "lefties" downplaying the Trump assassination attempt: "That's exactly why you lost the election. You are out of touch. You lost the plot about how people feel in the majority. That's what you did, and that was a perfect example of it, that situation. 'Oh, I think it was just a teleprompter.' You would have never assessed it that way if you didn't wish the guy had died. How f*cked up up is that? That you wished he had died? That you play down that he was shot at? It was disgusting. And I, for one, felt a measure of satisfaction that you were punished for it politically because there is no place for that." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

49,292 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Q: How can someone like you speak to me as a Black man and say my vote matters when historically it never has? James Talarico: They wouldn't be trying so hard to stop you from voting if your vote didn't matter. Voter suppression is proof that your vote has tremendous power. It is increasingly harder to vote here in Texas by design so the people in power never have to face accountability. I don't think you should feel that you owe loyalty to any party. You have a loyalty to yourself and your community. If one party is taking you for granted, you have a right to push back against them.

Q: How can someone like you speak to me as a Black man and say my vote matters when historically it never has? James Talarico: They wouldn't be trying so hard to stop you from voting if your vote didn't matter. Voter suppression is proof that your vote has tremendous power. It is increasingly harder to vote here in Texas by design so the people in power never have to face accountability. I don't think you should feel that you owe loyalty to any party. You have a loyalty to yourself and your community. If one party is taking you for granted, you have a right to push back against them.

Team Talarico

515,481 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

[Talking about self-worth and insecurities] 👨🏻‍🚀: I want everyone who has ever felt like they weren't pretty, they weren't attractive, they weren't good looking, they weren't strong enough, they had insecurities, or that they might feel like they're exploding from overthinking. And I'm not talking about one of these six, i'm talking about all of them. If you have ever had a situation where felt all six of these, I want you guys to type 1 into the chat. 👨🏻‍🚀: So, the point of that experiment wasn't to invalidate what you're feeling, because you're valid for feeling that. I think that is a common human emotion that we all have a problem we're dealing with. Our insecurities are the things that make us lash out, make us feel like we're not enough. And the thing about it, is no matter how rich you are, no matter how handsome you are, no matter how pretty you are, no matter how strong you are, no matter how great you are, no matter how intelligent you are, no matter how competent you are, there's always gonna be moments where this comes to you and I think the best thing to think in this situation is that yes i'm feeling this things, to validate yourself. You're not wrong for feeling this way. There's nothing wrong with you. Everyone feels this. 👨🏻‍🚀: But, during those times, i think it is very important to remember the moments in your life where you did feel worthy. Where you felt like you were just enough for that one person that you're talking to. Or you felt like you aced in a certain exam or you did really well in one thing. I think you remember those moments and then you push on for more of those moments so that eventually, in your life, you stop thinking about things that- or situation that made you think you're not worthy and start pondering more , recycling more of things that made you feel worthy. yunamseng?

[Talking about self-worth and insecurities] 👨🏻‍🚀: I want everyone who has ever felt like they weren't pretty, they weren't attractive, they weren't good looking, they weren't strong enough, they had insecurities, or that they might feel like they're exploding from overthinking. And I'm not talking about one of these six, i'm talking about all of them. If you have ever had a situation where felt all six of these, I want you guys to type 1 into the chat. 👨🏻‍🚀: So, the point of that experiment wasn't to invalidate what you're feeling, because you're valid for feeling that. I think that is a common human emotion that we all have a problem we're dealing with. Our insecurities are the things that make us lash out, make us feel like we're not enough. And the thing about it, is no matter how rich you are, no matter how handsome you are, no matter how pretty you are, no matter how strong you are, no matter how great you are, no matter how intelligent you are, no matter how competent you are, there's always gonna be moments where this comes to you and I think the best thing to think in this situation is that yes i'm feeling this things, to validate yourself. You're not wrong for feeling this way. There's nothing wrong with you. Everyone feels this. 👨🏻‍🚀: But, during those times, i think it is very important to remember the moments in your life where you did feel worthy. Where you felt like you were just enough for that one person that you're talking to. Or you felt like you aced in a certain exam or you did really well in one thing. I think you remember those moments and then you push on for more of those moments so that eventually, in your life, you stop thinking about things that- or situation that made you think you're not worthy and start pondering more , recycling more of things that made you feel worthy. yunamseng?

nad

32,990 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

A man alleged that in Bengaluru, vehicles parked in no-parking zones are fined only if they are from outside Karnataka. If the vehicle has a Karnataka number plate, no action is taken against it. In simple words, you can break the law if you are a vote for the government. You can park your car in the middle of the road and there will be no action, because the government needs your vote.

A man alleged that in Bengaluru, vehicles parked in no-parking zones are fined only if they are from outside Karnataka. If the vehicle has a Karnataka number plate, no action is taken against it. In simple words, you can break the law if you are a vote for the government. You can park your car in the middle of the road and there will be no action, because the government needs your vote.

कुंभकरण

269,754 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Yesterday I exposed Peter Obi and his movement on how they are exploiting our people's misery as a campaign strategy, and they are massively coming for me. I have no problem with that, which is also part of politics, but in a bitter way. This is what I want only APC supporters to be doing henceforth, whether under my post or someone else's post, or on any influencer's page that has been posting negative news about Nigeria, talking about how bad Tinubu is and how the economy is bad, kidnapping, and everything. Do not argue in the comment section. Just ask them questions: "What is the solution?" If you see a reply saying "let's vote out Tinubu," then ask them, "Who should we vote for?" And anywhere you see "let's vote for Peter Obi," then ask them, "What are Obi's solutions to these problems?" Those are the things you should be saying to them henceforth, and you will definitely silence them.

Yesterday I exposed Peter Obi and his movement on how they are exploiting our people's misery as a campaign strategy, and they are massively coming for me. I have no problem with that, which is also part of politics, but in a bitter way. This is what I want only APC supporters to be doing henceforth, whether under my post or someone else's post, or on any influencer's page that has been posting negative news about Nigeria, talking about how bad Tinubu is and how the economy is bad, kidnapping, and everything. Do not argue in the comment section. Just ask them questions: "What is the solution?" If you see a reply saying "let's vote out Tinubu," then ask them, "Who should we vote for?" And anywhere you see "let's vote for Peter Obi," then ask them, "What are Obi's solutions to these problems?" Those are the things you should be saying to them henceforth, and you will definitely silence them.

Aneex 🌍

21,260 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Dear Virginians, Tuesday is Election Day. And what happens on Tuesday, April 21, will shape your family, your freedom, and your prosperity—not just for a moment, but for the rest of this decade… and far beyond. If you stay home, and don’t VOTE NO, understand what you’re choosing. Right now, Virginia has the most balanced representation in the country —11 districts, with a mix of voices across the Commonwealth— 6 Democrats and 5 Republicans. This referendum—that you will vote on on Tuesday— changes that. You must VOTE NO! Why? Because if you don’t vote NO Virginia will have the most gerrymandered maps in the entire country and millions of Virginians will be disenfranchised. The proposed map shifts you to a reality where 10 Democrats and 1 Republican represent you. Even worse—7 of those 11 representatives would come from Fairfax and Richmond, living hours away, disconnected from your community, your values, and your daily life. Under these new lines, Fairfax-based politicians would represent citizens in: ➡️Williamsburg and Colonial Beach. ➡️Fredericksburg and Bowling Green. ➡️Culpeper and Stanardsville. ➡️Hampton Roads. ➡️Even into the Shenandoah County. Think about that. That is not “fair.” That is not “temporary.” That is not representation. The Democrats are lying to you. If they get what they want, you will be silenced. You must VOTE NO! This referendum overrides the bipartisan redistricting system that YOU voted for in 2020—replacing it with a last-minute political maneuver designed to lock in power before the next elections. If you don’t vote, you are not opting out. You are consenting! And those who only show up for presidential elections need to hear this clearly: This vote matters more. Because it determines who speaks for you—or whether anyone truly does. It determines if your vote will even matter at all. One more thing: If you have a 17-year-old who will be 18 by November 3—they CAN vote NO tomorrow too. They can register at their precinct and vote the same day. So no excuses. Get up. Get out. Vote NO. And make sure everyone you know does the same. VOTE NO. If you sit this out, don’t be surprised when your voice disappears and things get so much worse. WE NEED YOU TO VOTE?

Dear Virginians, Tuesday is Election Day. And what happens on Tuesday, April 21, will shape your family, your freedom, and your prosperity—not just for a moment, but for the rest of this decade… and far beyond. If you stay home, and don’t VOTE NO, understand what you’re choosing. Right now, Virginia has the most balanced representation in the country —11 districts, with a mix of voices across the Commonwealth— 6 Democrats and 5 Republicans. This referendum—that you will vote on on Tuesday— changes that. You must VOTE NO! Why? Because if you don’t vote NO Virginia will have the most gerrymandered maps in the entire country and millions of Virginians will be disenfranchised. The proposed map shifts you to a reality where 10 Democrats and 1 Republican represent you. Even worse—7 of those 11 representatives would come from Fairfax and Richmond, living hours away, disconnected from your community, your values, and your daily life. Under these new lines, Fairfax-based politicians would represent citizens in: ➡️Williamsburg and Colonial Beach. ➡️Fredericksburg and Bowling Green. ➡️Culpeper and Stanardsville. ➡️Hampton Roads. ➡️Even into the Shenandoah County. Think about that. That is not “fair.” That is not “temporary.” That is not representation. The Democrats are lying to you. If they get what they want, you will be silenced. You must VOTE NO! This referendum overrides the bipartisan redistricting system that YOU voted for in 2020—replacing it with a last-minute political maneuver designed to lock in power before the next elections. If you don’t vote, you are not opting out. You are consenting! And those who only show up for presidential elections need to hear this clearly: This vote matters more. Because it determines who speaks for you—or whether anyone truly does. It determines if your vote will even matter at all. One more thing: If you have a 17-year-old who will be 18 by November 3—they CAN vote NO tomorrow too. They can register at their precinct and vote the same day. So no excuses. Get up. Get out. Vote NO. And make sure everyone you know does the same. VOTE NO. If you sit this out, don’t be surprised when your voice disappears and things get so much worse. WE NEED YOU TO VOTE?

Loudoun County Republican Committee

24,690 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This Karen slips on the public sidewalk then comes to your door to tell you she tripped on your property and she won’t leave. She claims it’s your fault the sidewalk is that way. She keeps telling you to call the police. How do you handle this? Should you call the police or should you just go back inside and leave it alone? What if she came back to you with a suit? If it’s me I’m calling the cops on Karen.

This Karen slips on the public sidewalk then comes to your door to tell you she tripped on your property and she won’t leave. She claims it’s your fault the sidewalk is that way. She keeps telling you to call the police. How do you handle this? Should you call the police or should you just go back inside and leave it alone? What if she came back to you with a suit? If it’s me I’m calling the cops on Karen.

Suzee Q

14,816 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

ScotNews

21,718 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

If a man can become a woman simply by declaring it, then this is a woman. If he identifies as a man in his personal life and only identifies as a woman on the court, then “they” are gender fluid and you don’t get to say otherwise. And frankly it doesn’t even matter how he or she or they identifies because if there’s no difference between men and women anyway, then the women of the WNBA should have no trouble competing with Freedom regardless. And if you think this is stupid, I agree. The stupidity is the point.

If a man can become a woman simply by declaring it, then this is a woman. If he identifies as a man in his personal life and only identifies as a woman on the court, then “they” are gender fluid and you don’t get to say otherwise. And frankly it doesn’t even matter how he or she or they identifies because if there’s no difference between men and women anyway, then the women of the WNBA should have no trouble competing with Freedom regardless. And if you think this is stupid, I agree. The stupidity is the point.

Brittany Hughes

194,620 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

- On the day of the inauguration, during the oath-taking ceremony, the president did not place his hand on the Bible. His wife held it directly in front of him. I was standing just five meters away and saw everything. He did not place his hand on the Bible. And we should have all thought about it then: what was that about? Why didn't you place your hand on the Bible? If you, for example, didn't attach any importance to it, what prevented you from taking the oath as it should be? That's the protocol, that's the tradition. All presidents before you did it, so what stopped you? You didn't do it intentionally; it was your conscious choice. If you didn't care, you would have done it easily. What difference does it make to you? But you actually did care! You were fully aware of your actions! And yet, you didn't do it. Although, at that moment, no one around asked any questions. Everyone was celebrating, rejoicing, and no one asked: "Why didn't you place your hand on the Bible during the oath-taking ceremony? You've taken on the role of leader of the nation!" But no one asked. I didn't ask myself, even though it all happened before my eyes. And it hasn't given me peace since that day.

- On the day of the inauguration, during the oath-taking ceremony, the president did not place his hand on the Bible. His wife held it directly in front of him. I was standing just five meters away and saw everything. He did not place his hand on the Bible. And we should have all thought about it then: what was that about? Why didn't you place your hand on the Bible? If you, for example, didn't attach any importance to it, what prevented you from taking the oath as it should be? That's the protocol, that's the tradition. All presidents before you did it, so what stopped you? You didn't do it intentionally; it was your conscious choice. If you didn't care, you would have done it easily. What difference does it make to you? But you actually did care! You were fully aware of your actions! And yet, you didn't do it. Although, at that moment, no one around asked any questions. Everyone was celebrating, rejoicing, and no one asked: "Why didn't you place your hand on the Bible during the oath-taking ceremony? You've taken on the role of leader of the nation!" But no one asked. I didn't ask myself, even though it all happened before my eyes. And it hasn't given me peace since that day.

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

15,028 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen