🇺🇸🇮🇷 Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen is suggesting the U.S. should kill Iranian leaders who don't want a deal to secure an agreement. Fox News is now openly discussing this as a viable foreign policy strategy. Is this where U.S. foreign policy has landed?

And make sure you tell all of your terrorist friends. If your national slogan is “Death to America”, America just might rain death down upon you.

lol, war is hell, its never pleasant, but must be won once started. Everyone is such a pussy in 2026.

Surely if this the reasoning ability of people Who claim to be analysts then you have to understand that there no sober minded person there who can say this.

So finally this is all what usa can do ?!

Seems like a good foreign policy move

Foreign policy? You understand that it is a war right? Its a reasonable offer to take outvthe leaders that will not stop the wars.

I am not pro killing people. But I find it wierd when we pretend something is beyond the veil as if anyone outside of the iranian regime views their government leadership as being legitimate.

I have zero problem killing people who want to kill me. I'm strange that way.

Marc Thiessen is right: the U.S. needs to leverage every tool available, including leadership strikes, to ensure a stable agreement. Maximum pressure leads to maximum results.

Fox and WaPo columnist floating assassination as deal strategy. Shocking but not surprising given the rhetoric. Suggests mainstreaming of extreme options. Not official policy yet, but debate has shifted. Dangerous line.

Disgusting that this is where we are at

They got free propaganda from the US.

Yes. Correct.

Clever! I’d love to watch all the political elites kill each other! Better than sending the peasants in to fight for them

Sure, your “reporting” alone substantiates the need to do this.

Yes of course. You’re thirsty of blood but no one leaves the world without paying

Es una buena política :))

Is a coup taking place in Iran ? Is the IRGC taking over ? Just asking !!

Good lord, I did NOT vote for killings.

That’s a serious claim, and discussions like this often reflect commentary or opinion rather than official policy. In practice, U.S. foreign policy decisions are made through formal government channels and legal frameworks, so it’s important to distinguish between media debate

Hmm 🤔 hmm 🤔

Korea’s Special Envoy Chang Byung-ha met Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi. They discussed bilateral relations, regional issues, and ways to strengthen cooperation. The meeting reflects a positive step toward diplomatic dialogue and regional stability.

If U.S. foreign policy is seriously entertaining the idea of assassinating foreign leaders to “secure a deal,” that’s not strategy — that’s state‑sponsored terrorism dressed up as diplomacy. It’s reckless, illegal under international law, and would destabilize the region even further. The fact that mainstream outlets are floating it shows how normalized extreme violence has become in policy debates.

Haven't you"EVER" heard of cut the head of the snake?? They've Killed Thousands of 🇺🇸's over the last 47 years and I didn't hear a peep out of you about that?????🤔 This is you:

Roll

Thiessen you say?

I used to think Trump and his administration were fools. But it turns out that stupidity is widespread in American society.

Modern face of Diplomacy seems "Diplomacy to kill Diplomacy" Bizarre!

How did that happen?

Tbf, it would not be the first round but this feels like prepping

That’s sin.

That kind of talk from voices on outlets like Fox News pushes things into very dangerous territory because calling for targeting leaders in Iran is not normal diplomacy and risks escalating conflict in a serious way.