Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

WATCH: A man who teaches long-range ballistics (Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton) names cases in which a .30-06 hit someone in the spine and did not leave an exit wound: - MLK - a fellow Green Beret (survived, on video) - Shane Hill All spine hits, no exit wound....

MaxNordau's profile picture

Max 📟

79,475 subscribers

134,901 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & TeknolojiEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

WATCH: Green Beret Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton , who has worked extensively with explosives, explains how stupid Cancer Owens' "exploding microphone" theory is: - enough energy to kill a man and destroy the microphone - but it somehow didn't burn the shirt or even leave a hole, and the mic didn't leave the magnet "Newton's Third Law still applies. You just want to suspend it."
0:42

WATCH: Green Beret Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton , who has worked extensively with explosives, explains how stupid Cancer Owens' "exploding microphone" theory is: - enough energy to kill a man and destroy the microphone - but it somehow didn't burn the shirt or even leave a hole, and the mic didn't leave the magnet "Newton's Third Law still applies. You just want to suspend it."

Max 📟

18,469 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Joe Rogan Still Has Questions About Charlie Kirk’s Assassination “What's weird is the actual wound itself … It's not a big enough hole — .30-06 is a big rifle round. And to shoot a guy in the neck with a .30-06, you would expect an exit wound.”
1:32

Joe Rogan Still Has Questions About Charlie Kirk’s Assassination “What's weird is the actual wound itself … It's not a big enough hole — .30-06 is a big rifle round. And to shoot a guy in the neck with a .30-06, you would expect an exit wound.”

Chief Nerd

260,016 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Green Beret Gary Melton says body armor most likely explains why Charlie Kirk didn’t have an exit wound This analysis makes a lot of sense and addresses the questions I’m seeing on X I blurred out the graphic parts of the video but will link to the full version in the comments
5:32

Green Beret Gary Melton says body armor most likely explains why Charlie Kirk didn’t have an exit wound This analysis makes a lot of sense and addresses the questions I’m seeing on X I blurred out the graphic parts of the video but will link to the full version in the comments

Chief Nerd

215,484 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Candace Owens believes 100% there was no exit wound and believes the bullet hit Charlie’s Spine, which stopped the bullet, but doesn’t believe it was a 30-06 bullet because it wasn’t listed on his Death Certificate 🔻 My Thoughts: I was sent a video from someone at the event, which after review, shows the back of Charlie Kirk’s shirt move back upon impact, then to the front, like a reverberation (Kinetic), and I too felt it seemed plausible a bullet possibly hit and separated his spine upon impact. So I am in somewhat agreement with Candace Owens assessment. I zoomed the footage in to show it better and cut out the graphic part. Clip Spine
3:10

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Candace Owens believes 100% there was no exit wound and believes the bullet hit Charlie’s Spine, which stopped the bullet, but doesn’t believe it was a 30-06 bullet because it wasn’t listed on his Death Certificate 🔻 My Thoughts: I was sent a video from someone at the event, which after review, shows the back of Charlie Kirk’s shirt move back upon impact, then to the front, like a reverberation (Kinetic), and I too felt it seemed plausible a bullet possibly hit and separated his spine upon impact. So I am in somewhat agreement with Candace Owens assessment. I zoomed the footage in to show it better and cut out the graphic part. Clip Spine

MJTruthUltra

97,141 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT
1:29

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT

The SCIF

60,377 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

It’s too retarded for words 🙄 He was NOT shot with a high powered rifle from the left side, or from the front where the trans ”shooter” supposedly was. His body did NOT magically absorb a 30-06 round like Superman and prevent an exit wound. He was shot from the right side, which is why he fell left, with a smaller caliber pistol, and the wound we all saw WAS the exit wound. This bullshit story they’re peddling defies even being labeled as absurd. It’s a retarded and ridiculous fantastical lie.
1:07

It’s too retarded for words 🙄 He was NOT shot with a high powered rifle from the left side, or from the front where the trans ”shooter” supposedly was. His body did NOT magically absorb a 30-06 round like Superman and prevent an exit wound. He was shot from the right side, which is why he fell left, with a smaller caliber pistol, and the wound we all saw WAS the exit wound. This bullshit story they’re peddling defies even being labeled as absurd. It’s a retarded and ridiculous fantastical lie.

Solzhenitsyn's Ghost

29,047 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin
8:57

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin

The SCIF

17,884 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

The Daily Mail headline claiming “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson” is FAKE NEWS. That's not what the court filings said at all. Court filings indicating the ATF ballistic comparison was “inconclusive.” Which means there wasn't enough ballistics data on the bullet jacket fragment to determine whether it matched or didn't match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This is a totally common result for a ballistics analysis, inconclusive results happen in these cases between 20-66% of the time, and it means NOTHING. But—the ATF report did contain a very interesting piece of information. The court filings reveal the existence of the bullet jacket fragment itself. Not an in-tact bullet. A fragment. Which means the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk fragmented. Which explains the lack of an exit wound.
2:01

The Daily Mail headline claiming “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson” is FAKE NEWS. That's not what the court filings said at all. Court filings indicating the ATF ballistic comparison was “inconclusive.” Which means there wasn't enough ballistics data on the bullet jacket fragment to determine whether it matched or didn't match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This is a totally common result for a ballistics analysis, inconclusive results happen in these cases between 20-66% of the time, and it means NOTHING. But—the ATF report did contain a very interesting piece of information. The court filings reveal the existence of the bullet jacket fragment itself. Not an in-tact bullet. A fragment. Which means the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk fragmented. Which explains the lack of an exit wound.

Liz Wheeler

16,481 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Joe Rogan lays out why the official story of how Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk doesn't add up for him. He keeps circling back to two things: the gun and the wound. ROGAN: "There's something going on with the guy being able to climb on top of that roof with a gun, dismantle it, put it back together again, and then dismantle it again and put it back together again. Like the whole thing makes no sense." "Anybody who knows anything about guns knows that you take a scope off a gun, you take the barrel off the gun, you take the stock off the gun, you got to put it all back together again. You might not be on anymore. You're going to have to sight that gun in." "And this kid's not like a marksman. It's not like he's got a ton of experience shooting people and shooting at a distance." ".30-06 is a big rifle round. And to shoot a guy in the neck with a .30-06, you'd expect an exit wound. And there's no exit wound. It just goes in." "That's a round that you would shoot an elk with." What's your take on this? Let's hear it.
3:43

Joe Rogan lays out why the official story of how Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk doesn't add up for him. He keeps circling back to two things: the gun and the wound. ROGAN: "There's something going on with the guy being able to climb on top of that roof with a gun, dismantle it, put it back together again, and then dismantle it again and put it back together again. Like the whole thing makes no sense." "Anybody who knows anything about guns knows that you take a scope off a gun, you take the barrel off the gun, you take the stock off the gun, you got to put it all back together again. You might not be on anymore. You're going to have to sight that gun in." "And this kid's not like a marksman. It's not like he's got a ton of experience shooting people and shooting at a distance." ".30-06 is a big rifle round. And to shoot a guy in the neck with a .30-06, you'd expect an exit wound. And there's no exit wound. It just goes in." "That's a round that you would shoot an elk with." What's your take on this? Let's hear it.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

943,119 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Welp, it happened again. This is yet another reminder that if you miss your exit or you're confused about which exit to take, do not stop on the freeway. We don't know why this driver did this, but it resulted in a crash and several close calls - and they just drove off.
1:02

Welp, it happened again. This is yet another reminder that if you miss your exit or you're confused about which exit to take, do not stop on the freeway. We don't know why this driver did this, but it resulted in a crash and several close calls - and they just drove off.

Matt Bruning

278,668 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens
6:43

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

590,339 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨 The official story on Charlie Kirk’s shooting isn’t adding up. A full-power .30-06 round plowed through pork roasts + leg bones in tests… yet it allegedly stopped in his neck with no devastating exit wound? Figure spotted fleeing a DIFFERENT building. No clear firing video released. Ballistics reports raising more questions than answers. What really happened? Watch the full breakdown with Chris Martenson on Redacted 👇 Drop your thoughts below — coincidence or cover-up?
3:03

🚨 The official story on Charlie Kirk’s shooting isn’t adding up. A full-power .30-06 round plowed through pork roasts + leg bones in tests… yet it allegedly stopped in his neck with no devastating exit wound? Figure spotted fleeing a DIFFERENT building. No clear firing video released. Ballistics reports raising more questions than answers. What really happened? Watch the full breakdown with Chris Martenson on Redacted 👇 Drop your thoughts below — coincidence or cover-up?

GodFatherOfChaos

13,020 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

ROB O’NEILL: “THE MORE I LOOK AT IT, THE LESS IT MAKES SENSE” Former Navy SEAL Robert O’Neill is challenging the official account of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, arguing that the tactical and forensic details raise more questions than answers. How did Tyler Robinson allegedly transport a rifle onto a rooftop, disassemble and reassemble it, then escape with it, all while making what is described as a precision shot? O’Neill also points to the reported ballistics: a .30-06 round should have left a clear exit wound. Why was there no obvious evidence of one, and why was the scene cleaned so quickly? Robert J. O'Neill asks why these questions about the weapon, wound, and crime scene are dismissed rather than addressed directly. Questioning an official narrative should prompt evidence and transparency, not instant accusations of antisemitism.
4:36

ROB O’NEILL: “THE MORE I LOOK AT IT, THE LESS IT MAKES SENSE” Former Navy SEAL Robert O’Neill is challenging the official account of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, arguing that the tactical and forensic details raise more questions than answers. How did Tyler Robinson allegedly transport a rifle onto a rooftop, disassemble and reassemble it, then escape with it, all while making what is described as a precision shot? O’Neill also points to the reported ballistics: a .30-06 round should have left a clear exit wound. Why was there no obvious evidence of one, and why was the scene cleaned so quickly? Robert J. O'Neill asks why these questions about the weapon, wound, and crime scene are dismissed rather than addressed directly. Questioning an official narrative should prompt evidence and transparency, not instant accusations of antisemitism.

Redacted

87,708 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

The "VAN THEORY" Did the fatal shot/projectile come from inside or around the van behind Charlie Kirk? - The most fascinating part of this video is the alleged projectile that was caught on film directly before Charlie was hit, which would coincide with the front wound being an EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. - The overall angle makes more sense than the alleged rooftop shooter theory, which we now know was NOT a .30-06 round and was 99.9% most likely not taken from on top of the Losee building. - The back hatch of the van does open right before Charlie gets shot and then it closes immediately after. I believe we are getting a lot closer to the truth, while we uncover the massive amount of distractions and actors they had in place to cause misdirection, along with finding motives from potential foreign and or domestic actors. What are your overall theories and comments and is this object caught on camera the projectile that we've been looking for? cc: HustleBitch
1:58

The "VAN THEORY" Did the fatal shot/projectile come from inside or around the van behind Charlie Kirk? - The most fascinating part of this video is the alleged projectile that was caught on film directly before Charlie was hit, which would coincide with the front wound being an EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. - The overall angle makes more sense than the alleged rooftop shooter theory, which we now know was NOT a .30-06 round and was 99.9% most likely not taken from on top of the Losee building. - The back hatch of the van does open right before Charlie gets shot and then it closes immediately after. I believe we are getting a lot closer to the truth, while we uncover the massive amount of distractions and actors they had in place to cause misdirection, along with finding motives from potential foreign and or domestic actors. What are your overall theories and comments and is this object caught on camera the projectile that we've been looking for? cc: HustleBitch

The SCIF

85,858 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Candace Owens promised “explosive” evidence to blow the Charlie Kirk case wide open. In reality her "reporting" failed to mention: -The defense demanded the Losee Rooftop video be withheld, not the prosecution -That is not a "tactical military crawl," that's a retard scooting on a roof -There’s no explanation for who/what the person on the roof was supposedly "signaling" to -PLENTY of public footage already places Tyler Robinson on site -Not seeing a gun in this one specific clip proves nothing -A .30-06 recoil wouldn't cause a black eye -The medical examiner's report confirms the gunshot wound to the neck
3:55

Candace Owens promised “explosive” evidence to blow the Charlie Kirk case wide open. In reality her "reporting" failed to mention: -The defense demanded the Losee Rooftop video be withheld, not the prosecution -That is not a "tactical military crawl," that's a retard scooting on a roof -There’s no explanation for who/what the person on the roof was supposedly "signaling" to -PLENTY of public footage already places Tyler Robinson on site -Not seeing a gun in this one specific clip proves nothing -A .30-06 recoil wouldn't cause a black eye -The medical examiner's report confirms the gunshot wound to the neck

Steven Crowder

2,264,654 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

‼️SMOKING GUN: Gary Melton Had To Get His INTEL On Mitch Snow From Fort Huachuca—The Smoking Gun PROOF He's A Fed Asset?! 👀 This is the smoking gun. The question that Gary Melton from Paramount Tactical cannot answer, and the silence proves he's an intelligence asset trying to take down a true American hero, Mitch Snow. Let's lay out the facts. THE LIE: Gary Melton, Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton, brought a man onto his show to discredit Mitch Snow. This man claimed to be Mitch's long-lost son, painting Mitch as a liar and a deadbeat to undermine his bombshell testimony about Fort Huachuca. THE TRUTH: That man is NOT Mitch Snow's son. Period. Here's the undisputed timeline: When the boy was born, Mitch was put on the birth certificate. He immediately contested it and demanded a DNA test. The mother refused. To end the legal battle, Mitch signed over his parental rights. He has never met this person. He wouldn't know him from Adam. Because of this, the man is not listed on Mitch's background check, his military records, his veterans records, or anywhere else as a son or relative. As far as any public or private database is concerned, they are strangers. THE IMPOSSIBLE QUESTION: So how in God's name did Gary Melton find him? Think about it. You're a podcaster. You're trying to dig up dirt on a former Green Beret. Where do you look? Family. But Mitch Snow has no known connection to this man. There are no records. No paper trail. No social media links. They are ghosts to each other. The only way to find this needle in a haystack is with intelligence-grade access. The same kind of access the military and federal agencies have at Fort Huachuca. Gary Melton, an obscure youtuber did not "skip trace" a man who is officially and legally unrelated to Mitch Snow. That's not how it works. He was handed this man. He was given the name, the location, and the talking points by his handlers. This was a coordinated, intelligence-backed operation to assassinate the character of the man who exposed the CIA's human trafficking tunnel infrastructure. @Justice4Gr8Nate was an enemy of the state the moment he found those tunnels. And now the state, using assets like Gary Melton and Brian Harpool, is trying to destroy him. Gary Melton will never answer the question of how he found this guy, because the answer is "The FBI gave me his file." This isn't just a smear campaign. It's a confession. Gary Melton is a fed. His actions prove it. Gary Melton, did not "skip trace" a man who is officially and legally unrelated to Mitch Snow. That's not how it works. Be sure to FOLLOW Stew Peters below. ⚠️They want this investigation shut down. Right now, my channel is facing targeted attacks to bankrupt me and silence the truth surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want to ensure this investigation stays alive, your support makes all the difference 💪 🔗:
2:51

‼️SMOKING GUN: Gary Melton Had To Get His INTEL On Mitch Snow From Fort Huachuca—The Smoking Gun PROOF He's A Fed Asset?! 👀 This is the smoking gun. The question that Gary Melton from Paramount Tactical cannot answer, and the silence proves he's an intelligence asset trying to take down a true American hero, Mitch Snow. Let's lay out the facts. THE LIE: Gary Melton, Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton, brought a man onto his show to discredit Mitch Snow. This man claimed to be Mitch's long-lost son, painting Mitch as a liar and a deadbeat to undermine his bombshell testimony about Fort Huachuca. THE TRUTH: That man is NOT Mitch Snow's son. Period. Here's the undisputed timeline: When the boy was born, Mitch was put on the birth certificate. He immediately contested it and demanded a DNA test. The mother refused. To end the legal battle, Mitch signed over his parental rights. He has never met this person. He wouldn't know him from Adam. Because of this, the man is not listed on Mitch's background check, his military records, his veterans records, or anywhere else as a son or relative. As far as any public or private database is concerned, they are strangers. THE IMPOSSIBLE QUESTION: So how in God's name did Gary Melton find him? Think about it. You're a podcaster. You're trying to dig up dirt on a former Green Beret. Where do you look? Family. But Mitch Snow has no known connection to this man. There are no records. No paper trail. No social media links. They are ghosts to each other. The only way to find this needle in a haystack is with intelligence-grade access. The same kind of access the military and federal agencies have at Fort Huachuca. Gary Melton, an obscure youtuber did not "skip trace" a man who is officially and legally unrelated to Mitch Snow. That's not how it works. He was handed this man. He was given the name, the location, and the talking points by his handlers. This was a coordinated, intelligence-backed operation to assassinate the character of the man who exposed the CIA's human trafficking tunnel infrastructure. @Justice4Gr8Nate was an enemy of the state the moment he found those tunnels. And now the state, using assets like Gary Melton and Brian Harpool, is trying to destroy him. Gary Melton will never answer the question of how he found this guy, because the answer is "The FBI gave me his file." This isn't just a smear campaign. It's a confession. Gary Melton is a fed. His actions prove it. Gary Melton, did not "skip trace" a man who is officially and legally unrelated to Mitch Snow. That's not how it works. Be sure to FOLLOW Stew Peters below. ⚠️They want this investigation shut down. Right now, my channel is facing targeted attacks to bankrupt me and silence the truth surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want to ensure this investigation stays alive, your support makes all the difference 💪 🔗:

Project Constitution

102,922 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

SUPERCUT: Andrew Wilson walked onto Joe Rogan and executes every single Charlie Kirk conspiracy in 4 minutes. 0:00 The ActBlue-funded org pushing "TPUSA did it" is called "Unf*ck America" 0:31 Ian Carroll blamed Israel within 24 hours based on literally nothing and got 12M views 1:20 The exploding mic allegation: there are no burn marks, no smoke, nothing 1:39 The US Army's own manuals say that a .30-06 could create a wound like Charlie's 2:06 The completely made up $150M Israel offer to Charlie 2:59 Cancer Owens was offered $300,000 to debate her conspiracy theories but declined
3:51

SUPERCUT: Andrew Wilson walked onto Joe Rogan and executes every single Charlie Kirk conspiracy in 4 minutes. 0:00 The ActBlue-funded org pushing "TPUSA did it" is called "Unf*ck America" 0:31 Ian Carroll blamed Israel within 24 hours based on literally nothing and got 12M views 1:20 The exploding mic allegation: there are no burn marks, no smoke, nothing 1:39 The US Army's own manuals say that a .30-06 could create a wound like Charlie's 2:06 The completely made up $150M Israel offer to Charlie 2:59 Cancer Owens was offered $300,000 to debate her conspiracy theories but declined

Max 📟

14,980 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

CRUCIAL ANALYSIS of Charlie Kirk assassination. There is NO WAY a .30-06 round hit Charlie directly in the neck period. The damage would be tremendous, especially out the back. We need to continue to ask questions and work together. Not get mad at one another for bouncing theories and ideas off of one another. The SIDE SHO*TER FLASH does flash before the crack of the rifle sound which is consistent with the speed of sound, seeing the flash of a barrel before hearing it. Take notice to the direction the T-SHIRT pulls, this is interesting if Charlie was wearing a vest and a bullet fragment hit him in the neck, therefor causing no exit wound. Bullet entry wounds are usually small in the front and large out the back, especially with hollow point rounds because they flatten on impact. The neck is very fragile especially considering if a main artery is ruptured or torn from a gun shot. There is no way he was shot with a .30-06 round because there is no extreme damage on the neck and especially behind it with NO BULLET EXIT WOUND. It would of been catastrophic damage. The only thing that makes sense is if it was a fragment of the bullet round itself off the bullet proof vest. But what if he wasn't wearing one? We need to verify if Charlie was wearing a vest and what kind. This question should have been answered immediately, but it was never even asked. No way a .30-06 round hit Charlie's neck straight on PERIOD. Unless it was an exit wound from a completely other gun, sho*ter, or object, angle, etc. There are many more layers and theories but this needs to be said. Keep asking questions and keep digging. Would love to hear your thoughts and feed back. cc: ProjectConstitution
3:05

CRUCIAL ANALYSIS of Charlie Kirk assassination. There is NO WAY a .30-06 round hit Charlie directly in the neck period. The damage would be tremendous, especially out the back. We need to continue to ask questions and work together. Not get mad at one another for bouncing theories and ideas off of one another. The SIDE SHO*TER FLASH does flash before the crack of the rifle sound which is consistent with the speed of sound, seeing the flash of a barrel before hearing it. Take notice to the direction the T-SHIRT pulls, this is interesting if Charlie was wearing a vest and a bullet fragment hit him in the neck, therefor causing no exit wound. Bullet entry wounds are usually small in the front and large out the back, especially with hollow point rounds because they flatten on impact. The neck is very fragile especially considering if a main artery is ruptured or torn from a gun shot. There is no way he was shot with a .30-06 round because there is no extreme damage on the neck and especially behind it with NO BULLET EXIT WOUND. It would of been catastrophic damage. The only thing that makes sense is if it was a fragment of the bullet round itself off the bullet proof vest. But what if he wasn't wearing one? We need to verify if Charlie was wearing a vest and what kind. This question should have been answered immediately, but it was never even asked. No way a .30-06 round hit Charlie's neck straight on PERIOD. Unless it was an exit wound from a completely other gun, sho*ter, or object, angle, etc. There are many more layers and theories but this needs to be said. Keep asking questions and keep digging. Would love to hear your thoughts and feed back. cc: ProjectConstitution

The SCIF

437,524 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

I had on Chris Martenson a few weeks ago to explain his theories and breakdown his analysis as relates to his skepticism of the “official narrative”. It was a very interesting discussion. Towards the end, we almost seemed to agree on a potential explanation that could account for the skepticism of many as to how the bullet, if a 30-06, failed to create an exit wound. These types of discussions are far more useful than bickering back-and-forth on X. I have invited Ian Carroll to discuss his skepticism and alternative theories. I have invited Candace Owens as well. So far, Chris is the only one who has come on to discuss.
2:25

I had on Chris Martenson a few weeks ago to explain his theories and breakdown his analysis as relates to his skepticism of the “official narrative”. It was a very interesting discussion. Towards the end, we almost seemed to agree on a potential explanation that could account for the skepticism of many as to how the bullet, if a 30-06, failed to create an exit wound. These types of discussions are far more useful than bickering back-and-forth on X. I have invited Ian Carroll to discuss his skepticism and alternative theories. I have invited Candace Owens as well. So far, Chris is the only one who has come on to discuss.

Viva Frei

41,767 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Another account on the terminal wounding ballistics of the round that *reportedly* hit Charlie Kirk from his head of security. As I stated in my initial video on the topic - the odds that the wound pattern being described here was from a 30-06 round is very, very low in my opinion; perhaps even impossible for a commercially loaded round. However, since no one will tell us what exact loading and projectile was supposedly used we can only guess at this point which is just absurd in 2025 America. 📸: Shawn Ryan Show #CharlieKirk #ballistics #UVU #FBI #3006 #Mauser
1:52

Another account on the terminal wounding ballistics of the round that *reportedly* hit Charlie Kirk from his head of security. As I stated in my initial video on the topic - the odds that the wound pattern being described here was from a 30-06 round is very, very low in my opinion; perhaps even impossible for a commercially loaded round. However, since no one will tell us what exact loading and projectile was supposedly used we can only guess at this point which is just absurd in 2025 America. 📸: Shawn Ryan Show #CharlieKirk #ballistics #UVU #FBI #3006 #Mauser

Mrgunsngear

70,655 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce