Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

WATCH: Alberta gun owners react to Mark Carney’s plan to force licensed gun owners into giving up their firearms, in what govt calls a ‘voluntary’ gun ‘buyback.’ Criminologist Doug King says “It won’t impact crime rates,” as feds plan to move ahead anyway. Edward Djan reports.

24,983 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The Trudeau-era gun “buyback” program is a fiscal misstep that Canada simply can’t afford. With a national deficit projected to hit $61.9 billion in 2025, diverting hundreds of millions—potentially billions—toward confiscating legally owned firearms from law-abiding citizens is, economically speaking, indefensible. The program’s estimated $1.6B cost, which will almost certainly balloon like the failed gun registry of the mid-90's, siphons funds from critical priorities like healthcare, housing, infrastructure and public safety. In addition, the program also fails at its goal: to increase public safety. Since the first gun ban, issued by Trudeau's government via Order-in-Council in May of 2020, law enforcement and policy leaders from across the country have been clear: The data continues to show that legal gun bans have had no measurable effect to slow criminal gun violence. In fact, it's only gotten worse. Primarily, that's because 90%+ of firearms used in violent crimes in Canada are illegally smuggled into the country, not legally owned by Canadian citizens. Firearms purchased in a gun 'buyback' program, aren't the guns being used in crime. If the Mark Carney government is serious about being fiscally responsible, and a protector of the rights of law-abiding gun owners, it would be a pragmatic and prudent first step to scrap this ineffective and costly program. If you agree, please share this post. #cdnpoli

CCFR/CCDAF

25,987 просмотров • 1 год назад