Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

WATCH: Breaking down five key remaining Michigan transfer portal targets, including dynamic two-way athlete Salesi Moa (Salesi Moa). Full video here (FREE) #GoBlue.

18,157 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Marc Andreessen says Bob Noyce mentored Steve Jobs and called it "restocking the stream." Bob Noyce co-founded Intel. Before that, he led the "Traitorous Eight." They left Shockley Semiconductor to start Fairchild in 1957. Andreessen's read on him: "Bob Noyce was 100% the Steve Jobs of his time, just in the short-sleeve white dress shirt and the skinny black tie." Years before Jobs was famous, he would drive to Bob Noyce's house for dinner. Noyce was nearly two decades older. Andreessen describes the dynamic: "He was almost like a disciplinarian to Steve, because Steve was wild and reckless." Steve was 21 at the time. Years later, Noyce explained the choice in his biography. His exact words: "I learned from all the guys before me. I need to take that knowledge I've built up over multiple decades and push it down the generation." Andreessen on Noyce's metaphor for mentorship: "He said it was restocking the stream in which he fished from." Steve Jobs went on to build Apple. The fisherman never stops fishing. Mentor — or origin point? If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. P.S. I made a free toolkit breaking down 100+ mental models used by history's greatest thinkers. 5,000+ downloads. 113 five-star reviews. Grab your free copy here: — Marc Andreessen ( Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 ), co-founder of a16z, on David Senra's ( David Senra ) podcast

GeniusThinking

32,252 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🇸🇩🧵We’re kicking off a detailed thread to help you catch up on the catastrophic violence and humanitarian crisis unfolding in Sudan. If you haven’t been following closely, this will give you the essential context. ➤ Up to 400,000 people have been killed since the civil war broke out in April 2023, including an estimated 60,000 in El Fasher in the Darfur region, in just three weeks after its fall in late October 2025. (Yale Humanitarian Research Lab) ➤ Right now, about 21 million people in Sudan face acute hunger, with roughly 375,000 at famine levels, with some 13 million people displaced. (IPC) ➤ The United States plays a key role. It has enormous leverage over the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which is the chief external backer of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF)—one of the two main warring parties in Sudan. ➤ But experts and rights groups note the Trump administration is not using that leverage at all. In recent State Department briefings, Sec. Rubio and senior Africa officials have refused to even utter the name of the country. By not pressuring the UAE to halt its support, the U.S. is allowing the mass slaughter – “very likely genocide” according to HRW – to continue unabated. Follow along as we break down the key aspects of the crisis and what’s driving the violence. 👇 —— 🔴 Video Clip: Nicole Widdersheim of Human Rights Watch, her voice audibly breaking, describes atrocities against civilians in Sudan that are now “on par, if possibly not worse,” than those during the Darfur genocide two decades ago. (U.S. House Committee on December 11, 2025)

Drop Site

96,177 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨EPIC: Candace Owens & Bassem Youssef Roast Ben Shapiro: "Hurt His Feelings" Got Her Fired from Daily Wire – Full Tea Spilled 🤯 Candace Owens just sat down with Bassem Youssef for an absolute masterclass in calling out hypocrisy, and it's the interview everyone's talking about! Candace drops a never-before-told bombshell: She was explicitly denied having Bassem on her Daily Wire show—because his viral Piers Morgan takedown "hurt Ben Shapiro's feelings." That refusal? One of the key moments that led to her firing. Bassem doesn't hold back—he calls Ben Shapiro a world-class liar who "lies with purpose," breaking down three devastating examples: Lying about the USS Liberty attack being "fully investigated" and a "mistake" (despite gag orders and threats to survivors). Word-salad dodging on genocide questions—talking so fast "truth is still buffering." Deliberately misrepresenting a video of Palestinians digging pipes—claiming EU aid pipes turned into rockets, when it was actually Israeli pipes stealing Gaza water. Bassem: "He knows exactly what he's saying... whether put on the spot or premeditated." Candace: Her wake-up to Gaza started with Bassem's chart on Piers—asking the exchange rate for Palestinian lives. That's when she knew something was deeply wrong. This isn't comedy—it's clarity. Two voices the establishment tried to silence, now louder than ever. Watch THE FULL EPISODE before they try to bury it. Linked down below. 👇The masks are off. Who's watching this interview on repeat? Drop a 🔥 if Bassem just eviscerated the narrative. Be sure to FOLLOW Candace Owens

Project Constitution

26,557 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

‼️MUST WATCH: Olivia Swing Just CONNECTED The Dots On HOW Erika and Her Network Were PLACED Around Charlie Years BEFORE They Even Met🤯 I know this is a LONG one but If you REALLY want to understand the Charlie Kirk CONSPIRACY, you NEED to watch this! YouTuber Olivia Swing (Olivia J. Swing) dropped what might be the single best and most coherent breakdown yet on who Erika Kirk really is, her background, her mother Lori Frantze’s intelligence and defense contractor ties, and how Erika (along with others in her circle) appear to have been positioned around Charlie Kirk years before they ever started dating. This isn’t just surface-level speculation. Olivia walks through the timeline, the Romania connections, the Tyler Bowyer introduction, the business ties between Erika’s mother and key Turning Point figures, and how this network was already in place long before Charlie’s assassination. She also breaks down Erika’s pattern of inconsistencies and how quickly the narrative flipped after Charlie’s death. This is one of the clearest explanations I’ve seen of how Charlie may have been surrounded and handled long before September 10th. If you want to understand the full picture of who was around Charlie and why this all feels so coordinated, go watch this video. She really did an amazing job putting all the puzzle pieces together. Make sure to subscribe to Olivia Swing on YouTube and check out the rest of her series on this topic (she has multiple videos breaking this down). The links are in her channel. This one in particular is a must-watch. FOLLOW Olivia J. Swing, RT this, and watch her full seies linked below. Go watch it. This one connects a lot of dots. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE HERE: CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman Jimmy Dore

Project Constitution

71,095 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Matthew Gallagher Built a $401M Company in Year One with 2 People. And the tool behind it? Claude Code. This year he's on track for $1.8B. Sam Altman predicted this. It's happening now. The problem? It costs money. API credits stack up. Monthly bills keep growing. Every prompt eats your budget. Every project drains your wallet faster. Until now. Two methods. 99% cheaper. One is completely free. Forever. $0. Not a trial. This video breaks down both step by step. ↓ Let me put this in perspective. $100-$500. That's monthly. That's what you spend. That's $6,000/year on API credits. Just to use a tool you haven't shipped anything with. The $401M guy? Spending $0. Same capability. Shipping weekly. Different cost structure. Different results. Different life. I'm about to hand you his cost structure for free. ↓ Open source vs closed source. Pay attention. Closed source: Claude. GPT-4. Pay per token. Meter always running. Open source: Qwen. Llama. Mistral. Free to download. Free to run. Free forever. No meter. No tokens. No bill. Here's what nobody tells you: 80% of coding tasks? Open source handles them. More than handles them. Writes clean code. Debugs errors. Generates boilerplate. Handles routine work perfectly. You're paying premium prices for tasks that don't need premium intelligence. That's hiring a brain surgeon to put on a bandaid. Smart play: Free models for the 80%. Paid credits for the 20%. That's what the $401M guy does. That's what this video teaches you. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns that turn free tools into real businesses. ↓ Method 1: Ollama. Local. Free. Forever. Download it. Pull a model. Point Claude Code at it. Done. No internet needed. No API keys required. No monthly subscription. No token counting ever. No bill. Today. Tomorrow. Ever. Your data never leaves your computer. Complete privacy. Complete freedom. Claude Code thinks it's talking to the cloud. It's talking to your laptop. For $0. The video walks through every step: Every config file. Every variable. Every command. Every click. If you can follow a recipe, you can do this. People who set this up 3 months ago? Saved $300-$1,500 since then. Workflow didn't change one bit. ↓ Hardware you need: 16GB RAM: 7B models run smooth. 32GB RAM: 32B models run comfortable. 64GB + GPU: biggest models available. No GPU? Still works. Just slower. Few extra seconds. That's it. Your $1,500 laptop is sitting there running Chrome and Spotify. Put it to work saving you $200/month instead. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns that turn free tools into real businesses. ↓ Method 2: Open Router. Free Cloud. No Hardware. Weak machine? Don't want local setup? This method is for you. Free AI models in the cloud. No download. No hardware. Configure Claude Code to route through Open Router. The config: Base URL: Open Router API. API key: free Open Router key. Default Sonnet: free. Default Opus: free. Default Haiku: free. Small fast model: free. Subagent model: free. Free. Free. Free. Free. Free across the board. Same interface. Same commands. Same workflow. Zero cost. Copy the config from the video. Paste it. Save $200/month. Starting today. Right now. ↓ When to use which: Ollama (local): Best for privacy. Best for offline work. Best for unlimited usage. Best if you have decent hardware. Open Router (cloud): Best for weak machines. Best for instant setup. Best for trying different models. Best if you don't want to manage anything. Both methods: Best for 80% of your daily work. Still use paid Claude for: Complex architecture. Multi-file refactoring. Deep reasoning tasks. The 20% that actually needs it. $20/month instead of $200/month. Same output. 90% less cost. ↓ The math that should make you angry. You (current): $200-$500/month. $2,400-$6,000/year. $7,200-$18,000 over 3 years. You (after this video): $20-$50/month. $240-$600/year. $720-$1,800 over 3 years. Savings over 3 years: $6,480-$16,200. That's a used car. That's seed money. That's 6 months of rent. All from one 25-minute video. All from 15 minutes of configuration. Highest ROI 25 minutes you'll spend this year. ↓ The limitations. I won't lie to you. Open source is not Opus. Not as smart on complex reasoning. Not as good at long-context tasks. Makes more mistakes on nuanced problems. But they are: Free. Capable. Getting better monthly. Good enough for 80% of daily work. Smart cost management isn't being cheap. It's being strategic. Expensive tool when it matters. Free tool when it doesn't. ↓ The one-person billion-dollar company is coming. $401M in year one proved it's possible. The building blocks: AI that codes: Claude Code. Way to run it free: this video. Distribution: the internet. Customers: everyone. Only missing ingredient? Someone who builds. Not reads about building. Not saves posts about building. Not bookmarks videos about building. Builds. Tools are free. Knowledge is free. Opportunity is screaming. You're still "thinking about it." ↓ Your action plan: Tonight: Watch the video. Tomorrow morning: Set up Ollama or Open Router. Tomorrow afternoon: Build something. Anything. This week: Build a second thing. Faster. This month: Charge someone for it. One video. One setup. One weekend. $0 cost. Unlimited potential. Or keep paying $200/month for something you could get free. Keep consuming instead of building. Keep planning instead of shipping. Matthew Gallagher didn't plan a $401M company. He built it. Full video attached. Every method. Every config. Every tradeoff. 25 minutes. Your move. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns that turn free tools into real businesses.

Himanshu Kumar

13,677 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

$VET, #VeFam. In this video, I demonstrate in less than 4:30 minutes how to create an AI agent on veworld(.)ai. Watch me build a Mr. Robot Monologue Writer agent. If you haven't seen Mr. Robot, I suggest you watch it! This is just early bird access. The options for tools and integrations and such are limited, but what exists is already working quite well. The process is easy peasy. The UI is simple, but effective. It asks you for... 1. Role & Purpose 2. Voice & Style 3. Behavior 4. Rules 5. Tags 6. Avatar image 7. Welcome text. 8. Test drive before publication. ... and that's about it. This free version lets you have at most 3 agents, I am told. This implies that there is also a paid version. I'm all for it, because it sounds to me like VeChain is ready to do real business! I am providing feedback to Jérôme Grillères in order to help improve VeChain's AI agent marketplace. I didn't have to set up anything. The web UI is all I needed! The agent is running on Claude Sonnet 3.7. I did not have to provide a Claude API key. We seem to be riding along on VeChain's. I hope there'll be a choice for more models, including ChatGPT, in the future. This is so user friendly, that I can easily imagine that this would take off in a big, big way. I'm definitely building on this, when it goes into production with full features. Even if my own AI agents aren't successful, then I'm sure others' will be. And that means the $VET / $VTHO / $B3TR flywheel is going to take off in a big, big way. I, for one, am here for it. (See the reply below for the listing of the AI agent I just created.)

₿lackthorne AI

16,741 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

There are a lot of videos out there about the Pentagon on 9/11. This is the one I keep coming back to. It covers the last few seconds. The final approach of American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757, into the west wall of the Pentagon at 9:37:46 a.m. at roughly 530 mph. 184 people were murdered. 59 passengers and crew aboard Flight 77, and 125 people inside the building. What makes this video different is the structure. It runs the animation, and every time something happens along that flight path, it stops and cuts to a photograph of the actual thing. Animation says it clipped a light pole. Cut to the light pole, down in the road. Says it hit a taxi. Cut to the taxi. Says it took out a generator on the way in. Cut to the generator. Over and over, all the way down the approach to the facade. Five light poles sheared off in a line, each one photographed where it fell. Then it closes with a compilation of the aircraft debris recovered from the scene. That's the whole ballgame. Every step is a falsifiable claim with a picture attached. It isn't a model asking for your trust. It's a model you can check. And the photographs aren't the whole case. The flight data recorder was recovered and read completely. Speed, altitude, heading, control inputs, all the way to impact. That's what the NTSB used to reconstruct the approach, so the line you're watching in the animation isn't an artist's guess. The cockpit voice recorder was also recovered, but fire destroyed the recording. I'll say that plainly, because it's true and because someone will throw it at me. One box gave us everything. The other gave us nothing. Remains were recovered and identified by DNA. All but five of the people who died at the Pentagon were identified. Separately, five sets of remains matched no victim and no family reference sample. Those were the hijackers. Landing gear. Engine components. Fuselage with airline markings. Passengers' personal effects. All of it came out of that building. So here is my challenge to anyone who wants to tell me it was a missile. One. Explain the eyewitnesses. Over a hundred recorded accounts of a large commercial jetliner coming in low and fast, many of them naming American Airlines. Two. Explain the C-130. Reagan controllers asked an Air National Guard C-130H that had just departed to identify the unknown aircraft. The pilot spotted it, identified it as a Boeing 757, tried to follow it, and then radioed Washington Tower that it had crashed into the Pentagon. A military pilot in the air, looking directly at it. Three. Explain the five light poles. A missile does not shear off a line of poles across hundreds of feet on its way in. Four. Explain the two flight recorders pulled from the impact site, and explain the data on one of them. Missiles do not carry black boxes. And that recorder's speed, altitude, heading and control inputs match the primary radar track Dulles controllers were watching at 9:32. Two independent systems, one airborne and one on the ground, no shared hardware, same flight path. Five. Identify the missile. Type. Launch platform. Where it came from. Who put it there. Six. Tell me where Flight 77 went. Tell me where the 59 passengers and crew went. Real aircraft, real tail number, real people who boarded at Dulles that morning and had funerals. Where did they go? Twenty five years. Still waiting on number six. Watch the video. Video credit: Mike J. Wilson, "911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77

Alex Boge

124,510 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce