Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

#WATCH | Dr Ashok Sharma, Additional Professor, AIIMS Delhi says, "This study is conducted at Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, Patna and AIIMS New Delhi jointly. The outcome of this study showed that, when we analysed breast milk from 40 lactating mothers, we found Uranium-238 in all samples. Although 70% of...

ANI's profile picture

ANI

9,447,676 subscribers

66,964 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

#WATCH
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

RFK Jr. discusses the importance of breast milk for our children’s health. “Nobody is better at designing baby formula than God and evolution.” “And the nutrients in breast milk are just superior to anything that you can buy on the counter.” “Study after study supports that.” “We want to make sure that mothers who cannot give their babies breast milk for one reason or another, that they have very high quality baby formula that they know does not have contaminants in it.” Secretary Kennedy HHS Isabel Brown
1:00

RFK Jr. discusses the importance of breast milk for our children’s health. “Nobody is better at designing baby formula than God and evolution.” “And the nutrients in breast milk are just superior to anything that you can buy on the counter.” “Study after study supports that.” “We want to make sure that mothers who cannot give their babies breast milk for one reason or another, that they have very high quality baby formula that they know does not have contaminants in it.” Secretary Kennedy HHS Isabel Brown

Children’s Health Defense

14,970 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

It’s been more than 20 years since media headlines about the Women’s Health Initiative study incorrectly linked HRT to an increased risk of breast cancer, but even today many women still avoid HRT because of perceived breast cancer fears. This misinformation is really damaging to women’s health, so on my podcast this week I invited Dr Avrum Bluming to join me. Avrum is a leading US oncologist and has spent 25 years studying the benefits and risks of HRT in breast cancer survivors. As you’ll hear in the episode, Avrum tells me about more recent studies that have shown that oestrogen alone decreases the risk of breast cancer development by 23% and the risk of death from breast cancer by 40%. Yet many people still do not realise this. It is so important that everyone knows the real story about the WHI study and the misreporting of the data so I really would recommend listening to the full episode:
0:52

It’s been more than 20 years since media headlines about the Women’s Health Initiative study incorrectly linked HRT to an increased risk of breast cancer, but even today many women still avoid HRT because of perceived breast cancer fears. This misinformation is really damaging to women’s health, so on my podcast this week I invited Dr Avrum Bluming to join me. Avrum is a leading US oncologist and has spent 25 years studying the benefits and risks of HRT in breast cancer survivors. As you’ll hear in the episode, Avrum tells me about more recent studies that have shown that oestrogen alone decreases the risk of breast cancer development by 23% and the risk of death from breast cancer by 40%. Yet many people still do not realise this. It is so important that everyone knows the real story about the WHI study and the misreporting of the data so I really would recommend listening to the full episode:

Dr Louise Newson

40,567 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Dr. Byram Bridle, a virologist, has sounded a critical alarm about the systemic biodistribution of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and their alarming presence in breast milk. Years ago, Bridle warned that lipid nanoparticles in these shots could spread to organs like the bladder, intestines, and skin, raising concerns about vaccine shedding through urine, feces, sweat, and skin oils. Now, peer-reviewed science confirms his fears: fragments of synthetic mRNA from the vaccines are definitively present in the breast milk of vaccinated mothers. Bridle explains the mechanism: after injection, the vaccine migrates from the shoulder—contrary to claims it remains localized—through the lymphatic system and blood vessels to breast tissue. There, lipid nanoparticles fuse with mammary gland cells, which produce spike protein and release exosomes—tiny fat bubbles containing synthetic mRNA fragments—into breast milk. This means breastfeeding infants, including those under six months for whom the vaccines are not approved, are unknowingly ingesting these components orally, a route never authorized. Even more disturbing, Health Canada’s own vaccine monographs for Pfizer and Moderna shots admit there are no safety data for pregnant or breastfeeding women and no assurance that vaccine components won’t reach breast milk or harm infants. Despite this, the shots continue to be pushed on breastfeeding mothers without full disclosure, undermining informed consent. Bridle’s revelations demand urgent action. Why are infants being exposed to unapproved vaccine components? Why are breastfeeding women not informed of the risks?
4:55

Dr. Byram Bridle, a virologist, has sounded a critical alarm about the systemic biodistribution of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and their alarming presence in breast milk. Years ago, Bridle warned that lipid nanoparticles in these shots could spread to organs like the bladder, intestines, and skin, raising concerns about vaccine shedding through urine, feces, sweat, and skin oils. Now, peer-reviewed science confirms his fears: fragments of synthetic mRNA from the vaccines are definitively present in the breast milk of vaccinated mothers. Bridle explains the mechanism: after injection, the vaccine migrates from the shoulder—contrary to claims it remains localized—through the lymphatic system and blood vessels to breast tissue. There, lipid nanoparticles fuse with mammary gland cells, which produce spike protein and release exosomes—tiny fat bubbles containing synthetic mRNA fragments—into breast milk. This means breastfeeding infants, including those under six months for whom the vaccines are not approved, are unknowingly ingesting these components orally, a route never authorized. Even more disturbing, Health Canada’s own vaccine monographs for Pfizer and Moderna shots admit there are no safety data for pregnant or breastfeeding women and no assurance that vaccine components won’t reach breast milk or harm infants. Despite this, the shots continue to be pushed on breastfeeding mothers without full disclosure, undermining informed consent. Bridle’s revelations demand urgent action. Why are infants being exposed to unapproved vaccine components? Why are breastfeeding women not informed of the risks?

Camus

45,284 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#WATCH | Delhi: Union Minister of Health and Family Welfare JP Nadda says, "This is the first program that we are launching after coming to power...In 2014 we started 'Mission Indradhanush' and in 2024 we are scaling up the duration of the campaign from a fortnight to two months...In 2014, the mortality rate was 45 per 1000 live births which has been reduced to 32 per 1000 live births..."
4:36

#WATCH | Delhi: Union Minister of Health and Family Welfare JP Nadda says, "This is the first program that we are launching after coming to power...In 2014 we started 'Mission Indradhanush' and in 2024 we are scaling up the duration of the campaign from a fortnight to two months...In 2014, the mortality rate was 45 per 1000 live births which has been reduced to 32 per 1000 live births..."

ANI

14,630 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

In the UK, only around 14% of menopausal women take HRT and this number usually shocks people. But as you can hear Dr Mary Claire Haver talk about here - in the US it is only 4% now, when just over 20 years ago it was around 40%. Much of this reduction in HRT use and the negativity regarding HRT stems from the misinterpretation of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study which was published in 2002. For those of you who don’t know much about this, in 1993, the WHI began a clinical trial looking at the health effects of women taking oestrogen-only or combined HRT compared to a placebo. In 2002, researchers halted the part of the study looking at women taking both oestrogen and progesterone (two hormones that decline during the perimenopause onwards) early over concerns there were small increased risks of breast cancer, heart disease, strokes and blood clots. This led to confusion and concern from doctors and women worldwide, and in the UK women taking HRT fell sharply. But even with the older versions of HRT, the WHI researchers have subsequently acknowledged that HRT is the most effective treatment for managing menopausal symptoms like hot flushes and that taking oestrogen alone reduces the risk of breast cancer by 23% and death by breast cancer by 40%. It is time we move on from the misinterpretation of this study and allow more women to access hormone replacement if that is what they want.
1:19

In the UK, only around 14% of menopausal women take HRT and this number usually shocks people. But as you can hear Dr Mary Claire Haver talk about here - in the US it is only 4% now, when just over 20 years ago it was around 40%. Much of this reduction in HRT use and the negativity regarding HRT stems from the misinterpretation of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study which was published in 2002. For those of you who don’t know much about this, in 1993, the WHI began a clinical trial looking at the health effects of women taking oestrogen-only or combined HRT compared to a placebo. In 2002, researchers halted the part of the study looking at women taking both oestrogen and progesterone (two hormones that decline during the perimenopause onwards) early over concerns there were small increased risks of breast cancer, heart disease, strokes and blood clots. This led to confusion and concern from doctors and women worldwide, and in the UK women taking HRT fell sharply. But even with the older versions of HRT, the WHI researchers have subsequently acknowledged that HRT is the most effective treatment for managing menopausal symptoms like hot flushes and that taking oestrogen alone reduces the risk of breast cancer by 23% and death by breast cancer by 40%. It is time we move on from the misinterpretation of this study and allow more women to access hormone replacement if that is what they want.

Dr Louise Newson

39,148 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

#WATCH | Delhi | Professor in the Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, at the prestigious All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Dr. Rajni Sharma says, "We are conducting this study with the help of an NGO called the Society of Endocrine Health in Elderly, Adolescent, and Children. Through this study, we visit various schools to screen students for complications like metabolic problems, nutritional health issues, and even PCOS. We screen all these girls, follow them up, and invite those who have problems to AIIMS for further investigation...We have already been conducting this study for the last three years, and we are continuing it as an ongoing follow-up study...We are seeing a high prevalence of obesity. In private schools, up to 40% to 45% of girls are obese or overweight. Even in government schools, it is increasing, with up to 15% being overweight or obese, figures that were unheard of many years back. Consequently, the prevalence of obesity due to lifestyle diseases is increasing, and we have also observed many irregular cycles...From our investigations, we have seen a high prevalence of PCOS..." (22.09)
2:25

#WATCH | Delhi | Professor in the Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, at the prestigious All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Dr. Rajni Sharma says, "We are conducting this study with the help of an NGO called the Society of Endocrine Health in Elderly, Adolescent, and Children. Through this study, we visit various schools to screen students for complications like metabolic problems, nutritional health issues, and even PCOS. We screen all these girls, follow them up, and invite those who have problems to AIIMS for further investigation...We have already been conducting this study for the last three years, and we are continuing it as an ongoing follow-up study...We are seeing a high prevalence of obesity. In private schools, up to 40% to 45% of girls are obese or overweight. Even in government schools, it is increasing, with up to 15% being overweight or obese, figures that were unheard of many years back. Consequently, the prevalence of obesity due to lifestyle diseases is increasing, and we have also observed many irregular cycles...From our investigations, we have seen a high prevalence of PCOS..." (22.09)

ANI

22,570 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

The Case for Raw Milk: A Natural Ally in Childhood HealthRaw milk is more than just a traditional food—it’s proving to be one of nature’s most powerful allies in supporting immune health, reducing inflammation, and protecting against chronic conditions in children. A growing body of research shows that children who consume raw, unpasteurized milk enjoy a wide range of health benefits that processed dairy simply doesn’t offer. Among the most striking findings: -🫁 Lower Risk of Asthma & AllergiesA large -scale study of over 8,000 children found that raw milk consumption was linked to significantly lower rates of asthma, hay fever, and other allergic conditions. The protective effect was even stronger with early and consistent exposure. 🔗 The GABRIELA Study – Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2011)⸻ -🧴 Less Eczema & Skin IrritationAmong 4,767 children studied across Europe, those who consumed unpasteurized milk had fewer symptoms of eczema and a reduced risk of developing allergies. 🔗 Which Aspects of Farming Lifestyle Explain the Allergy Protection? (2006)⸻ -👂🤒 Fewer Ear Infections, Fevers & ColdsRaw milk was shown to protect against respiratory infections, fevers, and ear infections in infants—offering protection comparable to breastfeeding. -Consumption of Unprocessed Cow’s Milk Protects Infants (2015)⸻🥛 -Reduced Risk of Milk AllergiesA 2008 study found that babies whose mothers consumed raw milk while pregnant had a lower risk of milk allergies. Conversely, children exposed to pasteurized milk had a higher incidence of milk allergy. -Prenatal Exposure to a Farm Environment Reduces Atopy at Birth (2008)⸻🧬 Fewer Allergies in the First Year of LifeThis study showed that pasteurized milk intake was linked to higher rates of allergy development in infancy, while raw milk consumption had the opposite effect. -Atopic Sensitization in the First Year of Life (2013)⸻🌾 It’s Not Just the Farm LifeCritics often claim the benefits of raw milk are just due to the farm environment. But a 2019 meta-analysis showed that even non-farm kids in rural areas experienced reduced rates of asthma and allergies from raw milk—proving the milk itself matters. -The Beneficial Effect of Farm Milk on Allergies and Infections – Meta-Analysis (2019)⸻🦠 Supports Gut Health with More ProbioticsRaw milk consumers had a higher abundance of Lactobacillus—a key probiotic genus that supports digestion and immune balance. Pasteurization wipes these beneficial bacteria out. -Intake of Unpasteurized Milk Increases Lactobacillus Abundance (2020)⸻ - Heat Destroys What HealsThe allergy-protective properties of raw milk disappear once heated above 149°F—the point at which delicate whey proteins are denatured. These proteins are believed to be responsible for many of raw milk’s anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating effects.⸻ 🧒➡️👨‍⚕️ Long-Term Health ImpactChildren who consume raw milk not only experience fewer allergies and respiratory issues early on—they also show higher lung function and reduced allergic diseases in adulthood. These benefits may be partially explained by enhanced function of regulatory T cells, which help control immune overreaction.⸻ In an age where childhood illness is rising, raw milk offers a time-tested, research-backed alternative to over-processed dairy. The Wellness Farms
1:21

The Case for Raw Milk: A Natural Ally in Childhood HealthRaw milk is more than just a traditional food—it’s proving to be one of nature’s most powerful allies in supporting immune health, reducing inflammation, and protecting against chronic conditions in children. A growing body of research shows that children who consume raw, unpasteurized milk enjoy a wide range of health benefits that processed dairy simply doesn’t offer. Among the most striking findings: -🫁 Lower Risk of Asthma & AllergiesA large -scale study of over 8,000 children found that raw milk consumption was linked to significantly lower rates of asthma, hay fever, and other allergic conditions. The protective effect was even stronger with early and consistent exposure. 🔗 The GABRIELA Study – Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2011)⸻ -🧴 Less Eczema & Skin IrritationAmong 4,767 children studied across Europe, those who consumed unpasteurized milk had fewer symptoms of eczema and a reduced risk of developing allergies. 🔗 Which Aspects of Farming Lifestyle Explain the Allergy Protection? (2006)⸻ -👂🤒 Fewer Ear Infections, Fevers & ColdsRaw milk was shown to protect against respiratory infections, fevers, and ear infections in infants—offering protection comparable to breastfeeding. -Consumption of Unprocessed Cow’s Milk Protects Infants (2015)⸻🥛 -Reduced Risk of Milk AllergiesA 2008 study found that babies whose mothers consumed raw milk while pregnant had a lower risk of milk allergies. Conversely, children exposed to pasteurized milk had a higher incidence of milk allergy. -Prenatal Exposure to a Farm Environment Reduces Atopy at Birth (2008)⸻🧬 Fewer Allergies in the First Year of LifeThis study showed that pasteurized milk intake was linked to higher rates of allergy development in infancy, while raw milk consumption had the opposite effect. -Atopic Sensitization in the First Year of Life (2013)⸻🌾 It’s Not Just the Farm LifeCritics often claim the benefits of raw milk are just due to the farm environment. But a 2019 meta-analysis showed that even non-farm kids in rural areas experienced reduced rates of asthma and allergies from raw milk—proving the milk itself matters. -The Beneficial Effect of Farm Milk on Allergies and Infections – Meta-Analysis (2019)⸻🦠 Supports Gut Health with More ProbioticsRaw milk consumers had a higher abundance of Lactobacillus—a key probiotic genus that supports digestion and immune balance. Pasteurization wipes these beneficial bacteria out. -Intake of Unpasteurized Milk Increases Lactobacillus Abundance (2020)⸻ - Heat Destroys What HealsThe allergy-protective properties of raw milk disappear once heated above 149°F—the point at which delicate whey proteins are denatured. These proteins are believed to be responsible for many of raw milk’s anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating effects.⸻ 🧒➡️👨‍⚕️ Long-Term Health ImpactChildren who consume raw milk not only experience fewer allergies and respiratory issues early on—they also show higher lung function and reduced allergic diseases in adulthood. These benefits may be partially explained by enhanced function of regulatory T cells, which help control immune overreaction.⸻ In an age where childhood illness is rising, raw milk offers a time-tested, research-backed alternative to over-processed dairy. The Wellness Farms

Dr. Ben Tapper

103,437 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

They BBC claims that “breast milk from transgender women” is just as good for babies as regular breast milk. They don’t mention that it’s contaminated with drugs. The milk contains: • Domperidone (passes into milk; linked to heart rhythm problems in infants) • Spironolactone or cyproterone acetate (anti-androgens) • Estradiol/progesterone (high doses used in regimens) The milk’s nutritional composition is also inferior as lab analyses of induced-lactation milk from transgender women show: • Lower fat content (crucial for brain development) • Lower protein • Lower calories • Lower zinc and iron • Higher carbohydrate (from domperidone side effects) No long-term studies exist on what these drugs do to developing babies. The FDA and European Medicines Agency explicitly warn against domperidone in breastfeeding because of cardiac risk. The BBC’s woke reporting endangers the health and development of babies. Sue them again…
0:26

They BBC claims that “breast milk from transgender women” is just as good for babies as regular breast milk. They don’t mention that it’s contaminated with drugs. The milk contains: • Domperidone (passes into milk; linked to heart rhythm problems in infants) • Spironolactone or cyproterone acetate (anti-androgens) • Estradiol/progesterone (high doses used in regimens) The milk’s nutritional composition is also inferior as lab analyses of induced-lactation milk from transgender women show: • Lower fat content (crucial for brain development) • Lower protein • Lower calories • Lower zinc and iron • Higher carbohydrate (from domperidone side effects) No long-term studies exist on what these drugs do to developing babies. The FDA and European Medicines Agency explicitly warn against domperidone in breastfeeding because of cardiac risk. The BBC’s woke reporting endangers the health and development of babies. Sue them again…

Visegrád 24

214,437 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

While the destructive environmental impact of plastic is well known, it poses serious health challenges as well. In the last few weeks alone, there have been a couple of studies that have shown the health impact of microplastics. One study found microplastics in the human placenta. Another study found that micro and nanoplastics in key arteries, leading to an increased risk of heart attack. One of the interesting startups we have partnered with through Rainmatter by Zerodha is Zerocircle. They have developed and are scaling alternatives to bio-plastic. Here's Neha the founder, talking to Hansi explaining what inspired her and how seaweed can potentially help us with our plastic problem.
1:08

While the destructive environmental impact of plastic is well known, it poses serious health challenges as well. In the last few weeks alone, there have been a couple of studies that have shown the health impact of microplastics. One study found microplastics in the human placenta. Another study found that micro and nanoplastics in key arteries, leading to an increased risk of heart attack. One of the interesting startups we have partnered with through Rainmatter by Zerodha is Zerocircle. They have developed and are scaling alternatives to bio-plastic. Here's Neha the founder, talking to Hansi explaining what inspired her and how seaweed can potentially help us with our plastic problem.

Nithin Kamath

86,174 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

How Does Alcohol Affect Your Health? A new study (PMID: 38289182) examined the effect of alcohol consumption on health & this study attempted to correct some of the issues with earlier studies. Many studies include ‘false abstainers’ which are people who do not currently drink alcohol, but used to drink a lot. In these studies, it’s common to see that light to moderate drinking appears to have a protective effect on health, but this may be because people who drink ‘no alcohol’ in these studies, many of them used to be heavy drinkers who now abstain & thus they may have underlying health issues from their previous drinking. This study attempted to isolate out TRUE abstainers from alcohol consumption as controls to compare to light/moderate/heavy drinking The takehome of this study was that low amounts of alcohol are not protective, but they also do not appear to be very detrimental either. When we say low, that was defined as between 1 drink per week & 2 drinks per day. Intakes of alcohol above this showed linear increases in mortality risk The take home is we know alcohol is not great for you. At low intakes the risk is probably pretty small, but you probably should minimize drinking as much as possible if you’d like to reduce your risk of mortality
3:35

How Does Alcohol Affect Your Health? A new study (PMID: 38289182) examined the effect of alcohol consumption on health & this study attempted to correct some of the issues with earlier studies. Many studies include ‘false abstainers’ which are people who do not currently drink alcohol, but used to drink a lot. In these studies, it’s common to see that light to moderate drinking appears to have a protective effect on health, but this may be because people who drink ‘no alcohol’ in these studies, many of them used to be heavy drinkers who now abstain & thus they may have underlying health issues from their previous drinking. This study attempted to isolate out TRUE abstainers from alcohol consumption as controls to compare to light/moderate/heavy drinking The takehome of this study was that low amounts of alcohol are not protective, but they also do not appear to be very detrimental either. When we say low, that was defined as between 1 drink per week & 2 drinks per day. Intakes of alcohol above this showed linear increases in mortality risk The take home is we know alcohol is not great for you. At low intakes the risk is probably pretty small, but you probably should minimize drinking as much as possible if you’d like to reduce your risk of mortality

Layne Norton, PhD

32,974 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#WATCH | Delhi: Ramkumar S, Secretary and Mission Director (MD) of the National Health Mission (NHM) in Meghalaya says, "In Meghalaya, we have launched the 100-day TB programme as well as the Comprehensive TB Care Programme under which we are planning to completely reduce the mortality or morbidity due to TB... We have already launched a differentiated TB care programme in which we have categorised people as very high risk, medium risk and low risk... So through this, we wanted to ensure that the mortality rate in the state of Meghalaya is reduced..."
1:47

#WATCH | Delhi: Ramkumar S, Secretary and Mission Director (MD) of the National Health Mission (NHM) in Meghalaya says, "In Meghalaya, we have launched the 100-day TB programme as well as the Comprehensive TB Care Programme under which we are planning to completely reduce the mortality or morbidity due to TB... We have already launched a differentiated TB care programme in which we have categorised people as very high risk, medium risk and low risk... So through this, we wanted to ensure that the mortality rate in the state of Meghalaya is reduced..."

ANI

17,770 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#WATCH | Delhi: Dr Mohit Gupta, Professor of Cardiology, GB Pant Hospital says, "In our own study on 1,600 patients with heart attacks who had received the COVID vaccine and those who had not received it. We found that those who have received the COVID vaccine not only have lower chances of having a heart attack, all-cause mortality and sudden deaths, but also, following them for 30 days and 6 months, the chances of death of those people are significantly reduced. The COVID-19 vaccine is harmless and also plays a protective role. This study is not only ours; ICMR has also validated this... In our study, we took both the COVID vaccines and similar results were shown for both the Covaxin and Covishield..."
2:14

#WATCH | Delhi: Dr Mohit Gupta, Professor of Cardiology, GB Pant Hospital says, "In our own study on 1,600 patients with heart attacks who had received the COVID vaccine and those who had not received it. We found that those who have received the COVID vaccine not only have lower chances of having a heart attack, all-cause mortality and sudden deaths, but also, following them for 30 days and 6 months, the chances of death of those people are significantly reduced. The COVID-19 vaccine is harmless and also plays a protective role. This study is not only ours; ICMR has also validated this... In our study, we took both the COVID vaccines and similar results were shown for both the Covaxin and Covishield..."

ANI

718,384 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This is the outline currently under discussion between the United States and Iran. I am sharing this with caution, as it hasn’t been agreed upon yet, but based on recent developments, these are the points they have been discussing: A 15-year suspension of uranium enrichment. The United States originally demanded 20 years, while the Iranians wanted much less; they eventually settled on 15. The plan includes converting uranium into fuel, which changes its physical state and makes it harder to re-enrich. While not a simple process, this means the uranium won't necessarily leave Iran, which is a major concern for Israel. Full inspection of nuclear sites and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz are, of course, a given. The deal would also include ending the war, the withdrawal of American forces from the Gulf, and the lifting of economic sanctions. It must be said that, aside from the uranium, the lifting of sanctions is what worries Israel the most. As you recall, the strategic goal of the war was to create the conditions for the regime’s downfall. The regime was in danger of collapsing due to an economic situation that deteriorated primarily because of those sanctions; if they are lifted, the regime is strengthened. Therefore, it seems to me that the perception in Israel remains that the status quo is preferable—a state of "no war, no peace" where U.S. military forces remain on standby in the Persian Gulf. But as we have learned, this does not depend solely on Israel's desires, to put it mildly.
1:16

This is the outline currently under discussion between the United States and Iran. I am sharing this with caution, as it hasn’t been agreed upon yet, but based on recent developments, these are the points they have been discussing: A 15-year suspension of uranium enrichment. The United States originally demanded 20 years, while the Iranians wanted much less; they eventually settled on 15. The plan includes converting uranium into fuel, which changes its physical state and makes it harder to re-enrich. While not a simple process, this means the uranium won't necessarily leave Iran, which is a major concern for Israel. Full inspection of nuclear sites and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz are, of course, a given. The deal would also include ending the war, the withdrawal of American forces from the Gulf, and the lifting of economic sanctions. It must be said that, aside from the uranium, the lifting of sanctions is what worries Israel the most. As you recall, the strategic goal of the war was to create the conditions for the regime’s downfall. The regime was in danger of collapsing due to an economic situation that deteriorated primarily because of those sanctions; if they are lifted, the regime is strengthened. Therefore, it seems to me that the perception in Israel remains that the status quo is preferable—a state of "no war, no peace" where U.S. military forces remain on standby in the Persian Gulf. But as we have learned, this does not depend solely on Israel's desires, to put it mildly.

Amit Segal

258,101 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Is masculinity in a crisis? In today’s episode, I sit down with writer and scholar Dr Richard Reeves. Richard is the Founder and President of the American Institute for Boys and Men, which is an organisation that researches and addresses issues affecting men in our modern society. In this conversation, we discuss: • The rising rate of male suicides. • Men’s mental health and masculinity. • The health benefits of marriage for men. • The toxic impact of Andrew Tate. And so much more! I used to believe - especially when I was in my early twenties, that I was invincible in terms of mental health. At that age I thought mental health issues were things that happened to other people. Eventually, I found out I was wrong! Your mental health is just as important as your physical health. This is a conversation that I hope invites others, but specifically men, to speak about their mental health and any struggles that they’re facing. Really look forward to hearing your thoughts. Hit the link to watch the full episode now 👉
1:32

Is masculinity in a crisis? In today’s episode, I sit down with writer and scholar Dr Richard Reeves. Richard is the Founder and President of the American Institute for Boys and Men, which is an organisation that researches and addresses issues affecting men in our modern society. In this conversation, we discuss: • The rising rate of male suicides. • Men’s mental health and masculinity. • The health benefits of marriage for men. • The toxic impact of Andrew Tate. And so much more! I used to believe - especially when I was in my early twenties, that I was invincible in terms of mental health. At that age I thought mental health issues were things that happened to other people. Eventually, I found out I was wrong! Your mental health is just as important as your physical health. This is a conversation that I hope invites others, but specifically men, to speak about their mental health and any struggles that they’re facing. Really look forward to hearing your thoughts. Hit the link to watch the full episode now 👉

Steven Bartlett

64,128 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce