正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

✈️🎥 WATCH: Ever wondered how $ONDS “System-of-Systems’ actually works together to protect something like an airport? Well, here you go. The Ondas Airport Protection Center. Optimus - Aerial ISR RT-2000 - Ground ISR and perimeter security Insight Sensors - Detection Iron Drone - Hard-kill interceptor Sentrycs - Soft-kill mitigation... show more

BMSInvests

9,899 subscribers

14,954 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

$ONDS 🚨🤯 This. Is. Insane. Roboteam have just unveiled their new modular robotics unit - “Terminator”👀 At the heart of the system is “Iron Wave,” a fully integrated autonomous combat force featuring: • Two new “BISON” UGVs, each armed with 4 Iron Drones for CUAS/OWA AND an automated machine gun • Sentrycs’ Horizon • Dog Robot, Scout equipped with a small machine gun for ISR and engagement • The RT-20 MTGR, a compact UGV designed for underground operations The entire platform operates completely autonomously through a single unified command system: RoboHub. $ONDS is shaping the future of robotics🤯

$ONDS 🚨🤯 This. Is. Insane. Roboteam have just unveiled their new modular robotics unit - “Terminator”👀 At the heart of the system is “Iron Wave,” a fully integrated autonomous combat force featuring: • Two new “BISON” UGVs, each armed with 4 Iron Drones for CUAS/OWA AND an automated machine gun • Sentrycs’ Horizon • Dog Robot, Scout equipped with a small machine gun for ISR and engagement • The RT-20 MTGR, a compact UGV designed for underground operations The entire platform operates completely autonomously through a single unified command system: RoboHub. $ONDS is shaping the future of robotics🤯

BMSInvests

28,404 次观看 • 5 个月前

$ONDS is trying to build a full 'system-of-systems' across aerial drones, counter-drone systems, ground robotics, ISR, border security, demining and AI-enabled command-and-control. That's where the $PLTR partnership becomes important because software is what can turn a collection of drones, sensors and robots into a real operating system. The acquisition strategy is aggressive but this quarter made it look a lot more credible. Less like a roll-up and more like an emerging autonomous defense platform with real demand behind it.

$ONDS is trying to build a full 'system-of-systems' across aerial drones, counter-drone systems, ground robotics, ISR, border security, demining and AI-enabled command-and-control. That's where the $PLTR partnership becomes important because software is what can turn a collection of drones, sensors and robots into a real operating system. The acquisition strategy is aggressive but this quarter made it look a lot more credible. Less like a roll-up and more like an emerging autonomous defense platform with real demand behind it.

Shay Boloor

291,777 次观看 • 4 个月前

$ONDS 🚨👀 NEW: According to German media outlet, WELT, the city of New York is purchasing an Iron Drone Raider system from $ONDS‼️ This was also reported by the NY Post sometime last year, and it seems a purchase many now have been made. Credit: KevOnX Video is auto-dubbed to English.

$ONDS 🚨👀 NEW: According to German media outlet, WELT, the city of New York is purchasing an Iron Drone Raider system from $ONDS‼️ This was also reported by the NY Post sometime last year, and it seems a purchase many now have been made. Credit: KevOnX Video is auto-dubbed to English.

BMSInvests

24,357 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨🎥 WATCH: $ONDS New footage of Iron Drone Raider autonomously tracking and intercepting a rogue drone ⬇️

🚨🎥 WATCH: $ONDS New footage of Iron Drone Raider autonomously tracking and intercepting a rogue drone ⬇️

BMSInvests

22,729 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨👀 HAS $ONDS IRON DRONE RAIDER BEEN DEPLOYED @ THE FIFA WORLD CUP⁉️ In this video by Inside Edition, both Iron Drone Raider + Sentrycs were shown as some of the technologies reportedly being deployed by law enforcement across the tournament👀 When interviewed by Inside Edition, Eric Brock also shared how Iron Drone & Sentrycs handles any drone that enters restricted airspace. Fortem were chosen by the DHS to protect the World Cup, but State and Local agencies can also procure their own CUAS technologies using the FEMA grant. Interesting..🤔💭

🚨👀 HAS $ONDS IRON DRONE RAIDER BEEN DEPLOYED @ THE FIFA WORLD CUP⁉️ In this video by Inside Edition, both Iron Drone Raider + Sentrycs were shown as some of the technologies reportedly being deployed by law enforcement across the tournament👀 When interviewed by Inside Edition, Eric Brock also shared how Iron Drone & Sentrycs handles any drone that enters restricted airspace. Fortem were chosen by the DHS to protect the World Cup, but State and Local agencies can also procure their own CUAS technologies using the FEMA grant. Interesting..🤔💭

BMSInvests

35,973 次观看 • 3 个月前

$ONDS 🚨 Kansas City Police Department’s procurement of Ondas’ Sentrycs CUAS solution being approved at the Board of Commissioners Meeting in Feb 2026😎 We’re going to the World Cup👊🏻 Credit: shittin pennies

$ONDS 🚨 Kansas City Police Department’s procurement of Ondas’ Sentrycs CUAS solution being approved at the Board of Commissioners Meeting in Feb 2026😎 We’re going to the World Cup👊🏻 Credit: shittin pennies

BMSInvests

58,347 次观看 • 5 个月前

India's first privately built laser weapon has been delivered to the Army 🇮🇳 OleeSpace has handed over an AI powered directed energy weapon system to the Indian Army. Here is what the system brings 👇 • 2 kW laser mounted on an unmanned ground vehicle • AI based automatic target detection and tracking • Neutralises drone targets within seconds of detection • Near zero cost per kill against drone swarms • Under 250 kg making it highly mobile across all terrains • Designed for border defence, urban operations and perimeter security DRDO is developing 30 kW class laser systems for larger threats. This 2 kW system fills the close range anti drone gap right now.

India's first privately built laser weapon has been delivered to the Army 🇮🇳 OleeSpace has handed over an AI powered directed energy weapon system to the Indian Army. Here is what the system brings 👇 • 2 kW laser mounted on an unmanned ground vehicle • AI based automatic target detection and tracking • Neutralises drone targets within seconds of detection • Near zero cost per kill against drone swarms • Under 250 kg making it highly mobile across all terrains • Designed for border defence, urban operations and perimeter security DRDO is developing 30 kW class laser systems for larger threats. This 2 kW system fills the close range anti drone gap right now.

Military Observer

21,054 次观看 • 4 个月前

$ONDS Wow. Wow. Wow. 💥 Remember this footage yesterday from Ondas’ 4M Demining? 🛡️ Turns out it’s part of an Israeli Ministry of Defense project worth a total $1.7 BILLION (with a B!) to secure the eastern border with a ‘multi-layered system’ ⁉️ As well as the revenue from 4M. Could this be the huge border contract that Ondas won last month for thousands of drones? 🎥 More footage below⬇️

$ONDS Wow. Wow. Wow. 💥 Remember this footage yesterday from Ondas’ 4M Demining? 🛡️ Turns out it’s part of an Israeli Ministry of Defense project worth a total $1.7 BILLION (with a B!) to secure the eastern border with a ‘multi-layered system’ ⁉️ As well as the revenue from 4M. Could this be the huge border contract that Ondas won last month for thousands of drones? 🎥 More footage below⬇️

BMSInvests

93,583 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨👀 MUST WATCH: $ONDS Sentinel CEO, Ryan M. Hartman w/ $PLTR: “There is NO OTHER COMPANY in the WORLD that has a portfolio that covers the ground through the stratosphere” $ONDS is a unique, generational company in the making.

🚨👀 MUST WATCH: $ONDS Sentinel CEO, Ryan M. Hartman w/ $PLTR: “There is NO OTHER COMPANY in the WORLD that has a portfolio that covers the ground through the stratosphere” $ONDS is a unique, generational company in the making.

BMSInvests

13,799 次观看 • 1 个月前

$ONDS 🤯 Ondas now have a drone mothership that can carry up to TEN drones that have swarm capabilities and can travel @ 120kmh! I’m in awe of this company.

$ONDS 🤯 Ondas now have a drone mothership that can carry up to TEN drones that have swarm capabilities and can travel @ 120kmh! I’m in awe of this company.

BMSInvests

63,922 次观看 • 7 个月前

$ONDS 🚨 FULL INTERVIEW: amit 🤝 Eric Brock 🗣️ “My message (to investors) is, and always be, we work for you. The support has been critical for the success we’ve had.” 🗣️ “At the same time, we haven’t won (yet), we have a lot to do, we’re working extremely hard, but we do it together. We’ve always had the philosophy that the investors win with us. In fact, the investors have to win before we win, and that’s always served us well.” 🗣️ “Thats the message, we’ve got a lot more work to do, but it’s an exciting time.” amit, have you started your position in $ONDS yet?👀

$ONDS 🚨 FULL INTERVIEW: amit 🤝 Eric Brock 🗣️ “My message (to investors) is, and always be, we work for you. The support has been critical for the success we’ve had.” 🗣️ “At the same time, we haven’t won (yet), we have a lot to do, we’re working extremely hard, but we do it together. We’ve always had the philosophy that the investors win with us. In fact, the investors have to win before we win, and that’s always served us well.” 🗣️ “Thats the message, we’ve got a lot more work to do, but it’s an exciting time.” amit, have you started your position in $ONDS yet?👀

BMSInvests

148,724 次观看 • 6 个月前

#WATCH | Nagpur, Maharashtra: Solar Defence and Aerospace Ltd. (SDAL) demonstrated "Bhargavastra", an indigenous, vehicle-mounted, multi-layered Counter-Swarm Drone System designed to provide affordable and highly effective protection against the rapidly growing threat of weaponised drones, loitering munitions and autonomous drone swarms. Developed entirely in India, Bhargavastra represents a major technological breakthrough in counter-drone warfare and reflects SDAL's vision of anticipating the future character of conflict well before drones emerged as one of the most decisive battlefield weapons. The system employs indigenously designed and developed unguided rockets and precision micro-missiles arranged in a multi-layer engagement architecture, providing a highly effective yet economical means of neutralising hostile UAVs. It has also been designed for seamless integration with the existing Command, Control, Communication and Intelligence (C4I) networks of the Indian Armed Forces, enabling its employment in future network-centric operations. Engineered specifically for Indian operational conditions, Bhargavastra is capable of deployment across deserts, plains and mountainous terrain up to 5,000 metres above mean sea level, providing reliable protection against aerial threats along the country's entire land borders. The Command-and-Control Centre incorporates an advanced C4I architecture integrating a radar capable of detecting UAVs up to 10 km, an Electro-Optical/Infrared (EO/IR) surveillance system and passive RF sensors. These sensors provide multi-layer target detection, tracking and classification, generating a comprehensive air situation picture and enabling operators to engage either individual drones or coordinated drone swarms. Unlike conventional soft-kill systems based on jamming or spoofing, Bhargavastra provides an effective hard-kill solution against autonomous drones that are immune to electronic countermeasures. A team of Indian Army visited SDAL, Nagpur on 24th July 2026 as part of Status review against a PSO under make-II The Bhargavastra weapon system, in its full configuration comprising a Command & Control Vehicle (CCV) equipped with Radar, EO/IR and RF detectors integrated with the C4I system, along with a launcher vehicle carrying all the launch tubes, was demonstrated. The SDAL team flew a swarm of drones, which was successfully detected by the Radar, EO/IR and RF detectors. The C4I system displayed the complete situational awareness picture and generated a drone attack alert. The launcher was then assigned the targets by the C4I system, and the complete firing sequence was successfully demonstrated to the visiting team. Actual rocket firing was not carried out within the plant premises due to safety considerations.

#WATCH | Nagpur, Maharashtra: Solar Defence and Aerospace Ltd. (SDAL) demonstrated "Bhargavastra", an indigenous, vehicle-mounted, multi-layered Counter-Swarm Drone System designed to provide affordable and highly effective protection against the rapidly growing threat of weaponised drones, loitering munitions and autonomous drone swarms. Developed entirely in India, Bhargavastra represents a major technological breakthrough in counter-drone warfare and reflects SDAL's vision of anticipating the future character of conflict well before drones emerged as one of the most decisive battlefield weapons. The system employs indigenously designed and developed unguided rockets and precision micro-missiles arranged in a multi-layer engagement architecture, providing a highly effective yet economical means of neutralising hostile UAVs. It has also been designed for seamless integration with the existing Command, Control, Communication and Intelligence (C4I) networks of the Indian Armed Forces, enabling its employment in future network-centric operations. Engineered specifically for Indian operational conditions, Bhargavastra is capable of deployment across deserts, plains and mountainous terrain up to 5,000 metres above mean sea level, providing reliable protection against aerial threats along the country's entire land borders. The Command-and-Control Centre incorporates an advanced C4I architecture integrating a radar capable of detecting UAVs up to 10 km, an Electro-Optical/Infrared (EO/IR) surveillance system and passive RF sensors. These sensors provide multi-layer target detection, tracking and classification, generating a comprehensive air situation picture and enabling operators to engage either individual drones or coordinated drone swarms. Unlike conventional soft-kill systems based on jamming or spoofing, Bhargavastra provides an effective hard-kill solution against autonomous drones that are immune to electronic countermeasures. A team of Indian Army visited SDAL, Nagpur on 24th July 2026 as part of Status review against a PSO under make-II The Bhargavastra weapon system, in its full configuration comprising a Command & Control Vehicle (CCV) equipped with Radar, EO/IR and RF detectors integrated with the C4I system, along with a launcher vehicle carrying all the launch tubes, was demonstrated. The SDAL team flew a swarm of drones, which was successfully detected by the Radar, EO/IR and RF detectors. The C4I system displayed the complete situational awareness picture and generated a drone attack alert. The launcher was then assigned the targets by the C4I system, and the complete firing sequence was successfully demonstrated to the visiting team. Actual rocket firing was not carried out within the plant premises due to safety considerations.

ANI

61,956 次观看 • 1 个月前

Going all in on $ONDS changed my life. The next leg up will be legendary.

Going all in on $ONDS changed my life. The next leg up will be legendary.

BMSInvests

38,926 次观看 • 6 个月前

⚡️🇺🇦🇷🇺There is now confirmation of the first attempts to blind Russian FPV drones by installing small IR spotlights on Ukrainian drones, producing a bright, directional beam aimed at the incoming drone’s camera. In one case, a Ukrainian UGV tried to blind an approaching Russian FPV drone but failed. The second example was more successful a “Baba Yaga” drone was able to confuse the operator of an anti-drone interceptor that was attempting to shoot it down. For now, this cannot be called widespread, but in the future such a blinding system may become an effective method of countering FPV drones, especially fiber-optic-guided ones, which cannot be jammed by electronic warfare at all. And, as can be seen, the system can be installed on both ground and aerial platforms. So it turns out the outdated Passive Protection Systems (PPS) like the Shtora-1 so common in the late Soviet/Russian/Ukranian like the T-90A are state of the art now.

⚡️🇺🇦🇷🇺There is now confirmation of the first attempts to blind Russian FPV drones by installing small IR spotlights on Ukrainian drones, producing a bright, directional beam aimed at the incoming drone’s camera. In one case, a Ukrainian UGV tried to blind an approaching Russian FPV drone but failed. The second example was more successful a “Baba Yaga” drone was able to confuse the operator of an anti-drone interceptor that was attempting to shoot it down. For now, this cannot be called widespread, but in the future such a blinding system may become an effective method of countering FPV drones, especially fiber-optic-guided ones, which cannot be jammed by electronic warfare at all. And, as can be seen, the system can be installed on both ground and aerial platforms. So it turns out the outdated Passive Protection Systems (PPS) like the Shtora-1 so common in the late Soviet/Russian/Ukranian like the T-90A are state of the art now.

SIMPLICIUS Ѱ

46,911 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 World View CEO on partnership with $ONDS & $PLTR!

🚨 World View CEO on partnership with $ONDS & $PLTR!

BMSInvests

25,028 次观看 • 6 个月前

$ONDS THOUGHTS 💭 damn, guys... one year ago, on May 22, 2025, Ondas was trading around $0.90. and now? officially listed on FTSE Russell's preliminary Russell 3000 additions list 👀 that's a complete transformation. and not some small incremental move either. Ondas stopped being „just another drone company" a long time ago (even if many people still want to frame it that way). what they're building now is a real multi-layered autonomous defense ecosystem: air. ground. ISR. strike. C2. all orchestrated together. this isn't just technology anymore. more an architecture designed to create real battlefield superiority in modern warfare. exactly what the world increasingly needs right now. and they're executing all of this while posting record revenues, delivering four-digit growth rates and building an order backlog that gives visibility for years ahead. disciplined execution. a lot of people either forgot (or newer investors never even realized) what kind of loco run this company has already had in just twelve months. from trading below one dollar and basically being left for dead... to landing on the Russell additions list. and yes, healthy price action also means stocks eventually cool off, consolidate and stabilize. that's exactly what $ONDS has been doing over the past few months. that's not weakness. it's foundation building, maturity, it shows the story runs far deeper than just hype. something much bigger than another drone company is being built here. something strategically relevant. and honestly? the thing that drives me the most is that the market itself is still nowhere near its ceiling. this whole thing is only starting to accelerate. autonomous defense systems, Al-orchestrated battlefields and integrated multi-domain solutions are becoming a hundreds-of-billions-of-dollars (billions with a B!) market over the next decade. geopolitics alone is forcing nations to massively rearm and modernize. the direction is clearly laid out. totally transparent. no nasty surprises. you’re not buying a black box. Eric keeps saying it very clearly: out of the hundreds of players operating in autonomy and unmanned systems today, probably fewer than 10 real global winners will remain 10 years from now. the rest will either disappear or get acquired. Ondas clearly intends to become one of those survivors - and that's exactly what they're building toward. 🗣️ „We have hundreds and hundreds of companies. At the end, we're going to have fewer than ten unmanned companies." ⚡️ listen to the full Space with Chrispy and Eric Brock here:

$ONDS THOUGHTS 💭 damn, guys... one year ago, on May 22, 2025, Ondas was trading around $0.90. and now? officially listed on FTSE Russell's preliminary Russell 3000 additions list 👀 that's a complete transformation. and not some small incremental move either. Ondas stopped being „just another drone company" a long time ago (even if many people still want to frame it that way). what they're building now is a real multi-layered autonomous defense ecosystem: air. ground. ISR. strike. C2. all orchestrated together. this isn't just technology anymore. more an architecture designed to create real battlefield superiority in modern warfare. exactly what the world increasingly needs right now. and they're executing all of this while posting record revenues, delivering four-digit growth rates and building an order backlog that gives visibility for years ahead. disciplined execution. a lot of people either forgot (or newer investors never even realized) what kind of loco run this company has already had in just twelve months. from trading below one dollar and basically being left for dead... to landing on the Russell additions list. and yes, healthy price action also means stocks eventually cool off, consolidate and stabilize. that's exactly what $ONDS has been doing over the past few months. that's not weakness. it's foundation building, maturity, it shows the story runs far deeper than just hype. something much bigger than another drone company is being built here. something strategically relevant. and honestly? the thing that drives me the most is that the market itself is still nowhere near its ceiling. this whole thing is only starting to accelerate. autonomous defense systems, Al-orchestrated battlefields and integrated multi-domain solutions are becoming a hundreds-of-billions-of-dollars (billions with a B!) market over the next decade. geopolitics alone is forcing nations to massively rearm and modernize. the direction is clearly laid out. totally transparent. no nasty surprises. you’re not buying a black box. Eric keeps saying it very clearly: out of the hundreds of players operating in autonomy and unmanned systems today, probably fewer than 10 real global winners will remain 10 years from now. the rest will either disappear or get acquired. Ondas clearly intends to become one of those survivors - and that's exactly what they're building toward. 🗣️ „We have hundreds and hundreds of companies. At the end, we're going to have fewer than ten unmanned companies." ⚡️ listen to the full Space with Chrispy and Eric Brock here:

Bodoxstocks

15,846 次观看 • 3 个月前

system-atlas: a skill that builds an explorable isometric map of your codebase / agent / pipeline from one data file arranging the system visually does something for my brain that a wall of text doesn't i've found it way more useful to build up understanding of a system or a large change through these progressive disclosure style atlases than through docs. hover to read, click to pin, step inside a box to watch it run, click a packet to see the actual payload. chapters reveal the system a few boxes at a time instead of all at once. the md twin is generated from the same file so it can't drift works from both sides. - building a new architecture and moving pieces around visually before anything is written - pointed it at a 67 pr stack (don't ask how i got there) and finally understood how the thing fit together it also keeps track of every open question in the system. as you clarify or improve things the answers land in the atlas, so "wait did we decide that" has an answer instead of a scroll through slack.

system-atlas: a skill that builds an explorable isometric map of your codebase / agent / pipeline from one data file arranging the system visually does something for my brain that a wall of text doesn't i've found it way more useful to build up understanding of a system or a large change through these progressive disclosure style atlases than through docs. hover to read, click to pin, step inside a box to watch it run, click a packet to see the actual payload. chapters reveal the system a few boxes at a time instead of all at once. the md twin is generated from the same file so it can't drift works from both sides. - building a new architecture and moving pieces around visually before anything is written - pointed it at a 67 pr stack (don't ask how i got there) and finally understood how the thing fit together it also keeps track of every open question in the system. as you clarify or improve things the answers land in the atlas, so "wait did we decide that" has an answer instead of a scroll through slack.

harsh

165,461 次观看 • 28 天前

Vitalik Buterin on why consortium blockchains have mostly failed “The original vision of consortium blockchains — the idea that you have 5 banks or major companies that come together and create their own chain — has been mostly a failure. I think the reason why is it ends up inheriting most of the disadvantages of centralization and most of the disadvantages of decentralization at the same time.” “The first five banks join, and they all feel like ‘Yay, we’re building a system together. We can all be part of it.’ But then once bank #6 and bank #7 and bank #29 come in, they’re joining a system where there’s already an established power structure, established participants, and basically to them it still feels like they’re joining some kind of centralized thing that’s controlled by a cartel.” “You don’t actually gain the benefits of true openness that people are looking for. You don’t have Etherscan. You don’t have a connection to an open, public network. At the same time, if you build on one of those systems, you have to figure out how to program distributed systems; you lose privacy — you might think you still have some, but the reality is you’re putting your data on a network where the only people that get to see it are you and all your closest competitors. From a privacy perspective, it actually doesn’t make much sense.” “The compromise between centralization and decentralization that actually makes a lot more sense is: you have an application and today that application is a server. You can keep your server, but instead, we’re going to add scaffolding on top to give users extra security guarantees. You put Merkle roots on chain. You put proofs on chain. And you give your users assurance that whatever is happening inside of your system is actually following the rules. So you have high scale, high performance, and you optimize for a minimal delta for existing centralized infrastructure deployment. Keep your existing infrastructure the way it is, and you just add a side car that makes the roots and the proofs.” Source: Arbitrum

Vitalik Buterin on why consortium blockchains have mostly failed “The original vision of consortium blockchains — the idea that you have 5 banks or major companies that come together and create their own chain — has been mostly a failure. I think the reason why is it ends up inheriting most of the disadvantages of centralization and most of the disadvantages of decentralization at the same time.” “The first five banks join, and they all feel like ‘Yay, we’re building a system together. We can all be part of it.’ But then once bank #6 and bank #7 and bank #29 come in, they’re joining a system where there’s already an established power structure, established participants, and basically to them it still feels like they’re joining some kind of centralized thing that’s controlled by a cartel.” “You don’t actually gain the benefits of true openness that people are looking for. You don’t have Etherscan. You don’t have a connection to an open, public network. At the same time, if you build on one of those systems, you have to figure out how to program distributed systems; you lose privacy — you might think you still have some, but the reality is you’re putting your data on a network where the only people that get to see it are you and all your closest competitors. From a privacy perspective, it actually doesn’t make much sense.” “The compromise between centralization and decentralization that actually makes a lot more sense is: you have an application and today that application is a server. You can keep your server, but instead, we’re going to add scaffolding on top to give users extra security guarantees. You put Merkle roots on chain. You put proofs on chain. And you give your users assurance that whatever is happening inside of your system is actually following the rules. So you have high scale, high performance, and you optimize for a minimal delta for existing centralized infrastructure deployment. Keep your existing infrastructure the way it is, and you just add a side car that makes the roots and the proofs.” Source: Arbitrum

Etherealize

131,518 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.

Defense Intelligence

12,393 次观看 • 1 个月前

The U.S. just deployed a weapon that was supposed to stay classified for another decade 🚨🚨🚨 THE US JUST DEPLOYED "SOFT KILL" ELECTRONIC WARFARE IN IRAN → NO BULLETS, NO BOMBS, TOTAL DESTRUCTION 🚨🚨🚨 America just revealed a capability most people didn't know existed. Electronic warfare systems mounted on Black Hawks that can shut down an ENTIRE battlefield without firing a single round. Process that. WHAT "SOFT KILL" DOES: → Shuts down ALL enemy communications instantly → Disables drones MID-AIR — they fall from the sky like dead birds → Directed energy BLINDS every sensor, radar, and targeting system in range → Collapses entire command networks in SECONDS → No gunfire. No explosions. Just silence. HOW IT WORKS: → Electromagnetic pulse disrupts every electronic signal within range → Frequency jamming cuts off radio, satellite, and GPS simultaneously → Directed energy overloads sensors — radar screens go BLACK → Iran's drones can't navigate. Their missiles can't lock. Their troops can't communicate. 💀 Iran's $5B Chinese radar systems = BLIND 💀 Iran's Shahed drone swarms = falling out of the sky 💀 Iran's entire command structure = DEAF 💀 Every piece of electronics on the battlefield = DEAD ⚠️ The US used decoy drones to make Iran's radar "hallucinate" fake fighter squadrons ⚠️ Iran wasted interceptors shooting at targets that didn't exist ⚠️ This is why Iran's 31 missile waves keep missing — they're firing BLIND They're showing you explosions and airstrikes. They're NOT showing you that the US already won the electronic war before the first bomb dropped. Iran's entire defense network was NEUTRALIZED by systems that don't even make a sound. You don't deploy soft-kill systems for a 2-week war → you deploy them when you're rewriting the rules of warfare → and you only rewrite the rules when you plan to STAY. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨

The U.S. just deployed a weapon that was supposed to stay classified for another decade 🚨🚨🚨 THE US JUST DEPLOYED "SOFT KILL" ELECTRONIC WARFARE IN IRAN → NO BULLETS, NO BOMBS, TOTAL DESTRUCTION 🚨🚨🚨 America just revealed a capability most people didn't know existed. Electronic warfare systems mounted on Black Hawks that can shut down an ENTIRE battlefield without firing a single round. Process that. WHAT "SOFT KILL" DOES: → Shuts down ALL enemy communications instantly → Disables drones MID-AIR — they fall from the sky like dead birds → Directed energy BLINDS every sensor, radar, and targeting system in range → Collapses entire command networks in SECONDS → No gunfire. No explosions. Just silence. HOW IT WORKS: → Electromagnetic pulse disrupts every electronic signal within range → Frequency jamming cuts off radio, satellite, and GPS simultaneously → Directed energy overloads sensors — radar screens go BLACK → Iran's drones can't navigate. Their missiles can't lock. Their troops can't communicate. 💀 Iran's $5B Chinese radar systems = BLIND 💀 Iran's Shahed drone swarms = falling out of the sky 💀 Iran's entire command structure = DEAF 💀 Every piece of electronics on the battlefield = DEAD ⚠️ The US used decoy drones to make Iran's radar "hallucinate" fake fighter squadrons ⚠️ Iran wasted interceptors shooting at targets that didn't exist ⚠️ This is why Iran's 31 missile waves keep missing — they're firing BLIND They're showing you explosions and airstrikes. They're NOT showing you that the US already won the electronic war before the first bomb dropped. Iran's entire defense network was NEUTRALIZED by systems that don't even make a sound. You don't deploy soft-kill systems for a 2-week war → you deploy them when you're rewriting the rules of warfare → and you only rewrite the rules when you plan to STAY. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨

JinWoo Kim, IQ 289

2,390,675 次观看 • 6 个月前