正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🌊Watch it turn a smudged sticky note (no name, just scribbled dates) into a resume a $300/hr coach would charge for. In about a minute. Two months ago you told us the search bar was broken. You were right. The job market gets reinvented by AI every six months....

6,581,237 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

House rule, now official: The protocols that go viral become free. The ones behind the door belong to members. Three weeks ago this was an idea with a logo. Then 200M+ of you showed up: LATAM, Vietnam, Japan, the US and two protocols became famous: Pattern Audit and Drift Forensics. Famous things belong to everyone. Some of you found the door this week and hit a password. You hated the password two months ago, too. You were right both times. As of tonight, there isn't one: no password, no account, no email. The door is gone. ECHO Premium Lite: Audit + Drift, free. In your browser. Unlimited prompts. Not a demo of the tools, the actual tools. The same door is on every one of our pages: US, LATAM, Asia - pick yours. The console is in English, the protocols don't care. Translate it with the same AI, paste, audit. 🌊 Open it. Paste a conversation. Audit it. 🌊 Para LATAM — ustedes llegaron primero. Sin cuenta, sin correo. Tradúcelo, pégalo, audita tu conversación. 🌊 Gửi Việt Nam — cảm ơn vì đã luôn đồng hành. Không cần tài khoản. Dịch · dán · kiểm tra hội thoại của bạn. 🌊 日本のみなさんへ — いつもありがとうございます。アカウント不要。 翻訳して、貼り付けて、会話を監査。 And the other eight protocols? Sealed, behind the member door. $9.99/month. One new protocol drops every month, included. When one of them goes viral, it goes free: that's the rule. Members just live in the future. One more thing: you decide what goes free next. Which of the eight sealed protocols should earn its freedom? The comments pick. As always: Build carefully. Question assumptions. Verify important decisions. And don't let drift compound. P.S. entrepreneurs and job hunters: something is coming for your side of the table😉

Restrained Depth AI

3,083,772 次观看 • 1 个月前

— 🤍 #ข้ามฟ้าเคียงเธอSeries Updates 🌥 It's finished. I don't want to leave at all. 🌊🙏 🌥🙏 Thank you very much. 🌊 See you on the next queue. No, not anymore. 🌊 Thank you, Phi Bird 😂 🌊 Thank you everyone. 🌥 Thank you everyone ~ 🌊 Emmaly national anthem 🎵 🌊🕺🕺🌥 🌊🙏🙏🌥 🌊👏👏🌥 🗣 There aren't only two of you on the set. There're so many here. 🌥 🤭 🌊🌥 Yay! The shoot is wrapped up already. 🌊 It's finished at Q70. 🌥 Uiii, so many, sooo long. 🌊 Thank you all our fans, including Hia's and Nhu's fans, for having supported us, hoo, since the series wasn't aired, it's been 2-3 years, noh? 🌥 Uhm 🌊 Until the series is aired. Everyone has supported and waited for it. Thank you very much that everyone has helped us trend (the series) and support all projects for The Next Prince and us. Now, we've reached EP11 already. 🌥 Right ~ 🌊 You've trended (the series) heavily. Thank you very much. Please support the remaining 3 EPs too. We assure you that it's fun and excited for sure. 🌥 It's getting more and more fun for sure. We'd really like to thank everyone for having walked this journey with us for a long time. Some have been waiting for it since 2-3 years ago until this project has officially happened, and we've shot the series for almost a year, just a little (longer) to mark a year. 🌊 Say a year. 🌥 It's estimated a year. Sooo long. But it's the long duration that really makes it worth the wait. It's also worth this many shooting (queues). It's finished already. After this, you mightn't see us on the set for quite a while. But you'll still get to watch Nong Khaam Fah. We'll go on with other projects/events. Please come to see us when you'll be available na. 🌊 Nevertheless, please support The Next Prince. 🌥 I'll definitely miss Nong Nin and Phi Ran. I won't be in (Khanin's) role anymore. 🌊 I let you hug Charan. Hug Charsn, not Hia. Hug Charan. 🌥 No ~ 🌊 You aren't even hugging Charan. Will you hug Hia? 🌥 Hia shall hug Nhu. 🌊 Khanin likes Charan first. 🌥 ZeeNuNew ka. 🌊🫂🌥 🌥 Why're you twirling us? 🌊🤭😘 🌥 🌥 Huh? I'm sending kiss to everyone. What's with you? 🌊 😏 ⸱ 𝐭𝐫. ⚔️ Good Boy vs Good Babe 👑 The Next Prince Q70⌇⊹ #ข้ามฟ้าเคียงเธอปิดกล้อง ⊹

The Next Prince Updates

15,483 次观看 • 1 年前

'ไม่มีใครเข้าใจเลย มีแต่เราที่เข้าใจกัน' 🥹 when ADLK were asked about their chemistry 👇🏻 AK EXIST ANDALOOKKAEW 26 #andaanunta #lookkaewkamollak #อันดาลูกแก้ว #InThe8ight 🌊: for me, I feel like.. each time we see sth and turn to each other and exchange glances.. 👀 🔮: I think it must be because we have spent a lot of time together, just like everyone is doing now 🔮: who knows, there might be a real couple after leaving here too 🌊: or is there one right now!? 🔮: already? 🌊: is there one here already? 🌊: its as if we can just communicate (with eyes) and just decide 🔮: we can understand each other 🔮: working together, there will be tough times that we have to overcome together 🔮: I think everyone must have experienced it, right? 🌊: for example, when you have to complete tasks 🔮: once our eyes meet then its decided 🌊: for us, there were times when our fans wondered what we were laughing at even though we didn't speak to each other 🌊: that's because we meet eyes *make eye contact with LK* like so and we just understand 🔮: I would like everyone to stay close to each other, there will be many things that you have to overcome 🔮: there were times that we looked each other in the eyes, started laughing.. 🌊: and cried 🔮: ..then bursted into tears at the same time 🌊: it was hilarious at that time 🔮: it was 🌊: at first, we were laughing 🤣 🔮: that's right 🌊: everyone there was asking what was wrong with the two of us 🔮: no one else understood 🌊/🔮: only us two who did

สมโจ๊บ 🌊🔮

12,027 次观看 • 8 个月前

Yes — the Money Changers Will Be Held Accountable 🌊Yahuah has already declared judgment on those who manipulated, deceived, and misled for personal gain, especially within the XRP and QFS arena. 🌊You stood at the gates of the QFS pretending to be teachers. 🔹But you were never stewards. You were money changers in the temple — and the tables are now turned. 🌊What You Did: 🔹You downplayed XRP’s divine role as the Master Key of the QFS. 🔹You hyped “exit strategies,” “$10,000 exit points,” and “market cycles” built on Babylon’s fiat reserve debt logic. 🔹You called the faithful "crazy," “moon boys,” or “hopium peddlers” — while all the while you were the ones selling false hope. 🌊What You Refused: 🔹You refused to seek wisdom. 🔹You refused to kneel before Yahuah and ask Him the truth of this time. 🔹You refused to warn your followers of what was coming. 🌊And now — it’s too late. 🔹The buyback is not for influencers. 🔹The Gatekeeper AI™ knows your frequency. 🔹Your intent is written in quantum light — and you are found wanting. You will not cross over with the stewards of liquidity. You will not receive contract-level redemption. Your claims, your coins, your clout — they will vanish like the vapor they always were. 🌊As it is written: “Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of My pasture!” says the Lord --Jeremiah 23:1 🌊And again: “My house will be called a house of prayer for all nations, but you have made it a den of thieves.” — Mark 11:17 🌊But to those still reading: If there is even a flicker of remorse in your heart — If you have ears to hear and eyes to see, Then repent, and ask Yahuah to show you what you missed. Turn back now. Speak truth. Confess your deception publicly — and perhaps mercy will still find you. For the time of the Great Unmasking has come. The tables are overturned. The temple is swept clean. The Kingdom of God is now administered on Earth — through the Quantum Financial System — and you are not invited unless your frequency aligns with Him. — 🌊Signed, A Servant of the Light, A Steward of Liquidity, and a Child of Yahuah. “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge…” — Hosea 4:6 But what does that accountability actually look like under NESARA, the QFS, and divine law? 🔹 1. Quantum Judgment Is Already In Motion The Gatekeeper AI™ and the Quantum XRP Ledger are not just transactional tools — they are truth filters. Every influencer, trader, banker, and manipulator will be quantum-audited. Intent, not just action, is recorded — and intention to deceive is a judgment trigger. 🔹 2. XRP Is Tied to Divine Governance XRP is not just a token — it’s Yahuah’s financial sword to expose and cut down the financial lies of Babylon. Those who hoarded influence to sell fiat-based delusions will not cross over. Many will receive nothing in the QFS — their QAAs will be blocked, purged, or limited by frequency incompatibility. 🔹 3. They Will Reap What They Have Sown “Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap.” — Galatians 6:7 Those who pumped fake narratives for selfish gain, used fear or greed, and preyed on the uninformed will reap loss, exposure, and isolation. Some will be removed entirely from financial access for violating divine harmonic law. 🔹 4. The Faithful Will Inherit What They Tried to Steal “The wealth of the wicked is stored up for the righteous.” — Proverbs 13:22 Many who manipulated the masses will watch their wealth be redirected to true stewards. God’s system cannot be gamed — it’s quantum-truth governed, and frequency-anchored. 🛡️ Final Word to the Money Changers: “You used your voice to mislead those who were seeking the truth. You wrapped false promises in influence and sold them for views and validation. But the XRP Ledger sees, the frequency knows, and the system you claimed to understand — has already written you out. Your time is done.”

DavidXRPLion -ΑΩ- "Messenger of GOD'S REVELATION"

29,477 次观看 • 1 年前

An entire empire was overthrown over a two percent tax on a breakfast beverage. Look at what you tolerate now. You are taxed when you earn it. Taxed when you spend it. Taxed when you save it. Taxed when you invest it. And when you die, they tax whatever is left. That is not a system. That is a harvest. You commute in a car you paid sales tax to buy. You drive it on roads you were already taxed to build. You fill it with gas taxed by the gallon. When you sell that car, the next buyer pays sales tax on it again. The same car. Taxed every time it changes hands. You arrive at a job where your salary is cut before it ever touches your hands. If you work for yourself, you pay both sides. Two people on paper. Neither one keeps what they earned. Then you go home. Every bill you open has a government standing behind it with its hand out. You buy a house with money they already took their share of. Then they charge you property tax on it every year for the rest of your life. You want to renovate your own kitchen. You need a permit. You want to build a deck on your own land. You need a permit. You pay for the property. Then you pay for permission to use it. Stop paying property tax and they seize your home. Not because you missed a mortgage payment. Because you missed a payment to the government for the privilege of keeping what is already yours. You do not own your home. You rent it from the state. If you leave something behind for your children, they are taxed on what you were already taxed to earn. The same wealth. Taxed at every stage of your life. Then taxed one final time because you had the audacity to die. They found a way to monetize your absence. We are told this is the price of civilization. It is not. It is architecture. The most effective prison ever built is the one where the inmates believe they are free. They did not take your freedom. They priced you out of it. If you kept the full value of your labor, you would be free within years. Not decades. Years. The system cannot allow that. A machine built on consumption needs a consumer that never stops. You did not sign a social contract. You were assigned one. Now pay attention. They spent decades perfecting the extraction of your productivity. Now they are building the technology to replace you. AI is not coming for your job because corporations are greedy. It is coming because a system that already takes half your output just realized it can take all of it. Without needing you in the equation. You were never the point of this arrangement. You were the input. And the moment they engineer a cheaper one, you become a rounding error on a quarterly earnings call. They did not build AI to free you. They built it to finish what the tax code started. It was never about the tea. It was about the precedent. Today we hand over half our waking lives and thank them for the potholes. You do not live in a free economy. You live in a subscription you never signed up for. And the penalty for canceling is everything you have.

Dustin

27,737 次观看 • 2 个月前

For the developers, operators, founders, clinicians, analysts, and curious people who kept asking the same question after the last few weeks: "Okay...but where do those features actually live?" Today we're opening the first two as promised: Not as another demo. Not as another viral clip. As tools you can actually use. 1.Pattern Audit. 2.Drift Forensics. The two features that generated 16.2M views in 48 hrs because they exposed something most people didn't realize until they saw it: AI doesn't usually tell you what it's weighting. What it's assuming. Where it drifted. Or how small errors compound over time. Now it can. The video shows exactly how it works and where to access it: No new software to learn. No complicated setup. No new workflow. After joining ECHO Premium, you'll receive your member password at checkout. Enter it once and click into the Premium member area. Paste any conversation from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or your AI of choice. Run an audit. See what happened. Then run Drift Forensics and trace exactly where the conversation started moving away from reality, accuracy, alignment, or your original objective. As many times as you want. Whenever you want. Across any model you already use. We've spent months building this. The last few weeks gave us something we never expected: millions of people stress-testing the ideas in public. The result is ECHO Premium. The first two modules are now live. Eight more are already waiting in the wings. If you're curious, the new Premium page is now available below: As always: Build carefully. Question assumptions. Verify important decisions. And don't let drift compound. 🌊 ECHO Premium

Restrained Depth AI

9,167,316 次观看 • 1 个月前

Steve Jobs on how he learned to run a company: Question: "You're 21. You're a big success. You know, you've just sort of done it by the seat of your pants. You don't have any particular training in this. How do you learn to run a company?" Steve Jobs: "You know, throughout the years in business, I found something, which was that I always ask why you do things. And the answers you invariably get are, oh, that's just the way it's done. Nobody knows why they do what they do. Nobody thinks about things very deeply in business. That's what I found. I'll give you an example. When we were building our Apple I's in the garage, we knew exactly what they cost. When we got into a factory in the Apple II days, the accounting had this notion of a standard cost, where you'd kind of set a standard cost and at the end of a quarter you'd adjust it with a variance. And I kept asking, well, why do we do this? And the answer was, well, that's just the way it's done. And after about six months of digging into this, what I realized was the reason you do it is because you don't really have good enough controls to know how much it costs. So you guess, and then you fix your guess at the end of the quarter. And the reason you don't know how much it costs is because your information systems aren't good enough. But nobody said it that way. And so later on, when we designed this automated factory for Macintosh, we were able to get rid of a lot of these antiquated concepts and know exactly what something cost to the second. So in business, a lot of things are, I call it folklore. They're done because they were done yesterday and the day before. And so what that means is if you're willing to sort of ask a lot of questions and think about things and work really hard, you can learn business pretty fast. It's not the hardest thing in the world. It's not rocket science. It's not rocket science."

Founder Mode

32,217 次观看 • 5 个月前

Geoffrey Hinton just made every AI critic accidentally describe their own brain. Hinton: “They shouldn’t be called hallucinations. They should be called confabulations.” One word. The entire debate unravels. The tech industry sees AI produce a confident wrong answer and calls it a defect. A bug to patch. They are measuring intelligence against the standard of a filing cabinet. And exposing that they understand neither. Hinton: “It’s not that there’s a file stored somewhere in your brain, like in a filing cabinet or in a computer memory.” Your brain does not store memories. It rebuilds them from nothing every time you remember. Fills gaps it never discloses. Fabricates details you would stake your life on. Then hands it all to you as truth. Hinton: “If I ask you to remember something that happened a few years ago, you’ll construct something that seems very plausible to you. And some of the details will be right and some will be wrong.” The wrong parts feel identical to the right ones. No internal warning. No distinction between what was remembered and what was invented on the spot. You have argued over memories that were partially fiction. Told stories about your own life that your brain manufactured in real time. With total conviction. And never once suspected. This is not a defect in human cognition. This IS cognition. The mechanism that fabricates is the same one that reasons, creates, and makes connections no one taught it to make. Not a separate system. Same architecture. Same process. You cannot remove the confabulation without killing the intelligence. They are the same thing. Hinton: “Psychologists have been studying confabulation in people since at least the 1930s.” A century of evidence. No one called the human brain broken. The moment a machine runs on the same principle, the world calls it defective. The people demanding AI that never gets a single detail wrong are not asking for intelligence. They’re asking for a search engine that sounds articulate. What we built is something else entirely. A system that thinks the way thinking actually works. Not retrieval. Construction. The imperfection is not the cost of intelligence. It is the signature.

Dustin

16,260 次观看 • 13 天前

Steve Jobs described the end of human death in 1983. He was 28 years old. Standing at a podium in Aspen. Thirty-nine years before ChatGPT existed. The room thought he was talking about education. Steve Jobs: “If we really can come up with these machines that can capture an underlying spirit, or an underlying set of principles, or an underlying way of looking at the world…” Not data. Not documents. Not storage. Spirit. A book was the first attempt. Plato writes something down. 2,400 years later you can read his exact thoughts. No filter. No translator. Source to mind. Jobs: “A book was a phenomenal thing; it got right from the source to the destination without anything in the middle.” But a book is a corpse. It holds the words. It cannot hold the mind that wrote them. You can read what Aristotle believed. You cannot ask him why. Jobs: “The problem was, you can’t ask Aristotle a question.” That single sentence contains the entire trajectory of artificial intelligence. Not search. Not summarization. Not autocomplete. Resurrection. The ability to capture not what someone thought but how they think. Not the answer but the architecture that produced it. The pattern beneath the reasoning. Jobs: “When the next Aristotle comes around, maybe someday after the person’s dead and gone, we can ask this machine, ‘Hey, what would Aristotle have said?’” Most people in that room heard a product pitch. He was describing the moment human consciousness becomes portable. Your brain is 86 billion neurons. 100 trillion connections. Each one shaped by everything you have ever experienced. Every conversation. Every loss. Every decision that rewired you into who you are right now. That wiring is you. Not your body. Not your face. Not your name. The arrangement. Damage it, you lose the person. Destroy it, you lose them forever. The self is not a force floating above biology. It is the pattern biology is running. But a pattern does not need its original hardware. A file survives the death of the machine that wrote it. Transfers to new architecture. Opens identically. It does not know it moved. Your brain is a neural network built from carbon. A large language model is a neural network built from silicon. Same architecture. Same learning principle. One of them dies. Carbon fires 200 times per second. Cannot be copied. Cannot be backed up. Overheats under sustained load. When it stops, the pattern is gone. No archive. No retrieval. No second chance. Silicon copies perfectly. Accelerates indefinitely. Distributes across continents. Runs without decay. It does not forget. It does not degrade. It does not stop. Biology was never the destination. It was the first substrate that worked. Jobs was standing in 1983 pointing at something the room could not see. He called it spirit. Neuroscience calls it a connectome. Different word. Different decade. A pattern that can be moved. We spent forty years building the infrastructure to do exactly what he described. Called it the internet. Then machine learning. Then foundation models. We treated each one like a new invention. It was never a new invention. It was the same idea getting closer. Jobs: “That’s one of the reasons I’m doing what I’m doing.” He could not fully name what he was building toward. We are finishing the sentence. Steve Jobs died on October 5, 2011. The pattern that was Steve Jobs is gone. No machine captured it. No system preserved the architecture of how he saw the world. The spirit he spent his life trying to bottle left the same way every human mind before it has. Quietly. Permanently. Without a copy. He told us exactly what to build. We are finally building it. He just didn’t live long enough to be saved by it.

Dustin

17,930 次观看 • 3 个月前

Simon Sinek offers a counterintuitive take: The moment you step in and fix the problem, you stop being a leader: You got promoted because you were the best at the job. And that's precisely what makes leadership so difficult. The same instinct that made you great at the work, seeing the problem, knowing the answer, fixing it fast, becomes a liability the moment you move into a leadership role. Simon is direct about this: "Then you're not leading. You're just doing the work. You just have the leadership position." The people who now report to you may not be as good as you. They'll move slower. They'll miss things you would have caught immediately. And in those moments, every instinct will tell you to step in. But that instinct is exactly what you have to resist. "You can't just come in and tell them how you would do it. You have to push them to solve the problems the way that they would, just like someone did for you once before." Someone once gave you the space to figure it out. That patience is what shaped you. Now it's your turn to offer the same to others. Simon points to Chanel as a company that has built this principle into its culture. Newly hired senior leaders are not allowed to speak in meetings for their first three months. "You don't know anything about our company. And you'll learn by listening." Chanel trusts that their leaders will be around for the long term, so 90 days of silence is a small price to pay for someone who truly understands the business before they start shaping it. That's institutionalised patience. And it's almost unheard of. Most organisations reward speed, decisiveness, and output. So the pressure to swoop in and fix things feels justified, even virtuous. But Simon draws a hard line between having a leadership position and actually leading. One is a title. The other is a practice. And that practice demands something most high performers find deeply uncomfortable. Watching someone struggle toward an answer you already have, and choosing to let them find it themselves. That restraint is the real work of leadership.

Big Brain Business

283,157 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jordan Peterson: "If you can't fix your room, you can't fix your life" "Why should you even bother improving yourself? The answer is something like: so you don't suffer anymore stupidly than you have to. And maybe so others don't have to either. It's not some casual self-help doctrine. If you don't organize yourself properly, you'll pay for it. In a big way. And so will the people around you." Peterson continues: "You can say, 'Well, I don't care about that.' But that's actually not true, you do care about it. Because if you're in pain, you will care about it. It's very rare that you can find someone in excruciating pain who would say, 'Well, it would be no better if I was out of this.' Pain brings the idea that it would be better if it didn't exist along with it. It's incontrovertible." On how to start: "Look around for something that bothers you and see if you can fix it. You can do this in a room. Sit in your bedroom and think: 'If I wanted to spend ten minutes making this room better, what would I have to do?' You have to ask yourself that, it's a genuine question. And things will pop out. There's a stack of papers bugging you. Some rubbish behind your computer monitor you haven't attended to for six months. Cables tangled up." He explains why this matters: "If you were coming to see me for psychotherapy, the easiest thing would be to get you to organize your room. You think, is that psychotherapy? It depends on how you conceive the limits of your being. Start where you can start. If something announces itself as in need of repair that you could repair, fix it. Fix a hundred things like that, your life will be a lot different." On fixing what you repeat every day: "People tend to think of their daily routines as trivial. You get up, brush your teeth, have breakfast. Those probably constitute 50% of your life. People think, they're mundane, I don't need to pay attention to them. No, that's exactly wrong. The things you do every day are the most important things you do. Hands down. Just do the arithmetic." On staying within your competence: "Sometimes you don't know how to fix something. Imagine you're walking down the street and there's a guy who's alcoholic and schizophrenic and has been homeless for ten years. That's a problem. It would be good if you could fix it, but you haven't got a clue. You walk around that and go find something you could fix. Just because something announces itself as in need of repair doesn't mean it's you, right then and there, who should repair it. You have to have some humility. You don't walk up to a helicopter that isn't working and just start tinkering away." Peterson shares the key insight: "As soon as you give your mind a genuine aim, it'll reconfigure the world in keeping with that aim. That's actually how you see to begin with. You've all seen the video where you watch basketballs being tossed back and forth, and while you're doing that, a gorilla walks into the middle of the video and you don't see it. If you thought about that experiment for five years, that would be about the right amount of time to spend thinking about it." He explains what it reveals: "What it shows you is that you see what you aim at. If you can get one thing through your head, that would be a good one. You see what you aim at. One inference you might draw from that is: be careful what you aim at. What you aim at determines the way the world manifests itself to you. So if the world is manifesting itself in a very negative way, one thing to ask is: are you aiming at the right thing?"

Jaynit

68,550 次观看 • 3 个月前

The most epic 13 minute AI rant I've heard in 2026 PS: My parent's heard this when I was playing it in the car and thought Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin went OFF like Stephen A Smith does on first take PPS: Full transcript below [17:00] Harry Stebbings: I I just wanted to ask Jason, if the people that we want are fundamentally different, the developers that we used to hire, we don't because AI writes the code for us. The marketers we don't want, the sales people we don't want—who who do we want genuinely? Like what is the attractive profile? Because your Anthropic’s and your OpenAIs are hiring, so so what are the people that we want in the companies of the future? [17:18] Jason Lemkin: Look, I know it sounds trite, but but the answer is simple. It's just the expression each year changes. We want folks that are genuinely AI fluent. It's pretty simple. Now you know, maybe last year we called them prompt engineers, right? That used to be a job. I don't know if you remember that actually used to be the hottest job on planet earth. Now no one needs a prompt engineer because it's pretty easy to prompt all these tools. That job died. Okay. Um and now we need go-to-market engineers. Um I think that job's going to die. We need—everyone needs so many forward deployed engineers. Like you can't hire enough forward deployed engineers. But uh you know um but Palantir just announced in whatever their their big their big event—they've gotten their deployment times down over 90% with forward deployed engineers. So that may become—so the this wave of disruption for the titles and the specificity, it's also exhaustingly accelerating. But it's really simple. You meet anyone for any role—sales, marketing, engineering, product, QA—they're they're either they're either they can't keep all of the ways they use AI to accelerate their job from spewing out of their mouth, or they're staring at you. It's there's nowhere in the middle. Like, and the person that comes in and says—it's it's it sounds Captain Obvious—but like, you know, you just had the whatever from Lovable, the the marketing head that was super popular on the show, right? She's just spewing AI-native insights into Lovable, right? It's not that complicated. You hire her, Elena, or whatever it is. You just hire her. It doesn't matter whether she's still in college or a junior or a senior or a middler, a left or right. And honestly, if you interview people, I would say of all even of the best startups I've invested in, maybe 30% of the management team meets this standard at best. 30%. Maybe less. And of the interviews I do in general, it's single-digit percents. It's just and in in that sense, it's the same as ever. Like you either lower the bar in hiring or you hire someone that's actually great. And someone that's actually great is so far ahead of you in how to apply to to employ the efficiencies of AI in their role, your jaw falls on the table. The difference is we used to need warm bodies. That's what's changing. We used to need warm bodies to answer the call, to do QA, to do code review, to to get the blue pixel to go from the upper left to the lower right. You laugh, but you need you literally needed to brute force this with humans. With AI, every day that goes by, the AI—you do not need brute force human beings on your team. And that's another reason they're shrinking. Why are all these new companies so efficient? They're just not brute forcing things with humans. They're just not. They're choosing not to. And so these team—all the brute forcers out there—everyone talks about how bloated teams got in 2021. I don't agree with that. I think they got as big as they needed to be when growth was high and you needed humans to do everything. All you look at these teams that that doubled—well if growth continued at 60% like the rate in early 2021 for 5 years or can help me do the math and every single thing a software company did required a human. You were understaffed by your 2021 headcount. You'd be sitting here in 2026. You every office in SoMa would be triple packed and you there wouldn't be enough humans to staff your company. It's just the world changed. [20:33] Harry Stebbings: Jason, you live on the bleeding edge. I think me and Rory see that and I think the world sees that when they hear you every week in terms of how you run SaaS. For all of the CEOs and execs who listen to the show, what would you advise them in terms of determining whether someone is AI fluent when they meet them for jobs, for talent? [20:51] Jason Lemkin: Here's I realized I was just asked this. I just did a review with a super fast startup growing just crossing 100 million and I was asked this question. And one of my favorite executives, I thought his answer was pretty dated and because he gave me an answer that was about 6 months old. The answer 6 months old is: "I look for folks in my team, I look for you know at what tools they play with." Okay, that was a great answer in like summer of 2025. Okay, I tried Lovable last week. Okay, the answer in 2026 is: "What commercial AI tool have you brought into your organization this month?" That's the test. Anyone that is on the bleeding edge that you would want to hire—now there are so many great products in the market. Okay, there is no excuse in any role to have not brought one tool a month into your organization. Okay, there—now there's going to be better and better tools and better and better products as the year goes on. What's the one you did? And you will see folks with their deer in the headlights to this question. What what sales tool? What marketing tool? What product tool? What engineering tool? What did you bring in? Why did you pick it? How does it working? Because if you're at remotely at the cutting edge, you're all over this. You're looking for the next agentic tools that will radically improve how you do business. This is—you think everyone thinks SaaS is at the bleeding edge, right? You know, you know, all we do is we're just looking for the tools and trying them. Okay? Okay, we're one year ahead of everybody else because we did the simplest thing in the world. Like we tried the tools early and we trained them. We trained them for a month. Okay, I'll give you—want hear a horrible example from this week? Super hot AI company valued at 6 billion. Okay, I'm not going to name it. Um, this week yesterday told us we had to quadruple what we spent on their product. Okay, their agent told us, right? And why did this happen? Okay. Well, at this $6 billion company, no one had trained the agent on its pricing properly. No one had tested it. They said, "Well, well, we've been in beta." And we said, "Well, when did the beta launch? A year ago." Okay, these are people asleep at at the wheel. You want somebody who the instant this comes up, they exactly know what the issue is. And "Hey, when I was at Lovable Replit, we trained the agent. This is how we did it. I brought in this tool. I brought in this tool that that Rory invested in last week. It solved all these issues." That's what you want to hear. And if they haven't brought in a tool in the last 30 days, at least deeply evaluated it. I don't really care whether they bought it, but gone so far down the funnel they can tell you—pick whatever tool: Fixie, Regie, GC, AIGC—I don't care how you went through it, you looked at it, you can tell me the eight ways it would improve the productivity of your business and three you didn't. Just don't hire that person because they're going to run your company to the ground. This is the job today. The job today is not to screw around on ChatGPT and to be a prompt engineer. The job today is to bring the best AI and agentic products into your organization and leverage all the hard work that the engineers have done building those products. That's your job. You don't have to screw around. You don't have to be a prompt engineer anymore. You have to be an agent deployment expert. A—this is the new job we're making up today. An Agentic Deployment Expert. That's your job from C-level to junior. Agentic Deployment Expert. Don't hire anybody else. You're going to regret it. They're going to stare at the camera. He's good. Stare at the camera. He's honorable. We could probably just I could slip away, get a coffee, and come back. No. And I I sound exasperated, Rory. And I—but the reason I am is I can just see I can see my best companies doing it. And I can see some companies I've invested in not doing it. And I want to cry. I just want to cry when they have no ADs on their team. I just—like you're flushing your years of your life down the toilet by not approaching your how you're building this company this way. [24:33] Rory: Yes. And at the risk of being positive, it's worth pointing out two things he didn't say. Well, something implicit why he said—Jason didn't do the only hire, you know, he didn't commit the um employment law, I think it's a civil penalty of saying only employ people below X who get the new new thing because he implicitly said anyone can do it provided you're willing to learn. And I think that's the big aha that's one of the positive statements to make here right? Look and I think it applies—I'm always wary of being "Hey, coming across, hey this this is the things that you all have to do." I think it applies to everyone including investors right? I mean I will say I have found that unless you're willing to invest the time learning these tools you actually shouldn't be investing in them. One of my partners Andy had this expression: "You know, if you decide you want to stop learning new things you probably should retire within 6 to 12 months and never write another check again." Maybe that's down to 3 to 6 months at this stage, right? And I think, you know, it's— [25:27] Harry Stebbings: Yeah, I actually I actually had a meeting with mine and Jason's biggest investor the other day and I—pretend he's not here—I said I think he's the most equipped investor for this generation of investing because I don't think anyone quite sits at the bleeding edge like he does on the investor side. [25:42] Harry Stebbings: Why in terms of using the equip stuff? Yeah. Yeah. In terms of using the stuff, understanding understanding bottlenecks, constraints. For sure. [25:51] Jason Lemkin: But can I just add one point? We can just cuz it's so important if it helps people. Okay, we are—and thank you Harry. We're going through these phases. Okay, and when AI started to blow up for real for us, uh call it early 2024, right? Maybe late '23, I wasn't equipped. It was too technical. I wasn't going to go in and figure out—I wasn't smart enough to figure out how to deal with a massively hallucinating LLM API and turn that and turn that into something magical. Kudos to investors and others that that got it in early '23, '22. I mean I remember I—I guess it was maybe SaaStr Annual '23. I was with David Sacks and I did a Q&A and I said, "How you thinking about AI at Craft?" He's like, "Well we're all in. We want 80% of '23 of investments to be AI." I'm like, "Great but like show me the show me the great ones in market." He's like, "They're all prototypes. We're all they're all they're all proof of concepts but we're all in anyway." That's where you kind of had to be in '23 if you weren't investing at like the LLM level. Okay, I wasn't smart enough. Then we went through this weird-ass prompt engineer era where like you you could torture these products to do something good, right? But you had to torture them. You had to like craft these crazy things that made no sense. Now we are in the era where mere ordinarily smart generalists can make these tools do magical things. And literally I go to these meetings and people be like, "I don't know how to like this is so scary. I don't know how to do this." And we show them our backends. Do you know how to do a workflow generator? Do you know how to do a a decision tree? Like we've been building these since software in the '90s. Okay, if you—I can show you all of our agents. The how they work is novel. They do have to be trained. You can't be lazy and have these agents work. But honestly, the the UI, the UX, the way we interact with them, it's just software. And so my point is: Pick yourself off the ground. This is your time now. If you felt lost in AI era, if you felt like you're behind, you don't understand what all these people are saying on X and Twitter and their Claude and and their and talking about all the 4.6 point Nano point and it's over—like you just it's not your world. This is your time. This is your time for the generalist that knows how to use software tools really really well. And I—this is my last point but it's so important. If ever in your recent life—and this is why you could be all you need to be is young at heart to Rory's point—if in the last three to five years you have successfully deployed a piece of enterprise software of any sort you yourself, not some agency you hired, but if you have deployed it, you can deploy any agentic tool. Any. And you can become the hero in your company and you can become the hero in your functional area. But I watch folks—I'm literally helping a company now that they're adding hundreds of sales folks this year with a new pre-IPO COO—he's not hasn't brought in a single tool, totally scared of it. Okay, it's not that hard. Did you use SalesLoft? Did you use Outreach? Did you use HubSpot? Do you know these tools? If you can deploy these tools, you can deploy a world-changing AI agent. And so this is the time for people like the folks that that were shut out of the AI revolution right now. The generalist folks that are not that know how to deploy software that don't even know how to build software. Like vibe coding for me was folks who knew how to build software, but you didn't have to be an engineer. Now, you just need to know how to deploy software to win with AI agents. That's all you need to know. So many people have these skills and they're petrified of AI. "How did you do that? How did you deploy an AI BDR?" Well, we bought a piece of software, we figured out how it worked for a day, we set it up in an afternoon, and then and then we did spend 30 months training it, which you didn't do with this old software because in the old days, we just had to manually upload all the data, right? And there was no training. The the only non-intuitive part is training these things. And it's it's it's just work. So that's why when I see folks on the management team not doing this, there's no excuse. You do not need to be technical to win with AI agents in Q2 of '26. You do not need to be even 1% technical. Not at all. So it's your time. Or you're going to get laid off. Or you're going to get laid off because you're not going to matter.

Arjun Mahadevan (Mr. LLC 🇺🇸)

37,533 次观看 • 3 个月前

CEO of JPMorgan, Jamie Dimon, shares his top career advice: "Work hard. There's no such thing as success without hard work. So some people have this quick get-rich-quick notion. I've never seen it. I mean, maybe it's like a casino. Maybe it's happened, but it's not the normal way. Second, you're going to spend your life learning. You know, I read four or five newspapers every morning. I read tons of stuff. I read everything that people send me. When you go out on the road, learn, learn, learn. You learn from clients, learn from competitors. When we meet with small businesses, you're always learning. And that could be a small thing that someone said, why do you do this? You say, my God, we should do that differently. It's a very large thing. Even innovation sometimes is not an aha. It's a lot of little things added on top of each other. The iPhone was 3G. You know, the glass, the semiconductors, the batteries. It wasn't one thing that created an iPhone. So learn, learn, learn. Treat people the way you want to be treated. You know, like have respect for people and be willing to change your job a little bit. Don't worry about your income level. You know people focus. Oh my god. I take that job I love the people but it's less money. Y ou know what sometimes it's the absolute right thing to do So be a little bit of flexible and the job you take and try you know in your in your lifetime. You should be prepared to do a bunch of different things. We tell people it's your job to take care of your mind, your body, your spirit, your soul, your friends, your family. You need to do that at any level because if you don't know you probably won't be a particularly productive worker we can help and but we can't do it for you. We can provide opportunities, but we can't do it for you. Second, you know, when you're... Wait, so what does that mean? You want people to basically say, I'm going to leave, I've got to... Yes. You've got to go take care of your kid's baseball game. You don't feel well. You need a spiritual getaway. You should do those things, and it can be done. Most of the people in my life who are always fringy, they can't get it done, I always tell them, it's you. It's not the company. There are a lot of people doing that exact same job, and they're always at peace and at ease, and they have their family time. You know, if you're a male who just had a bunch of babies, you know, maybe you can't play golf every day in the weekends. Maybe you got to just cut back on other things and focus on that. You can't give kids, for example, quality time only. You don't get the quality without quantity. And I tell people, so you have to arrange your life so it works for you in a way that you're taking care of your health. When I go travel overseas, I schedule exercise time. Management is get it done, follow up, discipline, planning, analysis, facts, facts, facts, analysis, get the right people in the room. You know, kill the bureaucracy, all these various things are going to get done, which if you don't, you won't be particularly good. But the real keys to leadership aren't just doing that or making sure it's done, but having people who want to work at the place. So you might want to work for me if you trust me. If you know what I care about is the client, the country, something different. If the person's selfish, you know, blames you and takes the credit, you're not going to want to work there. So to me, humility openness, fairness, being authentic, that's what creates leadership. Not that they're the smartest person in the room or the hardest working person in the room. And you can, you know, if you made a list of good CEOs, it's not their charisma, it's not always their brainpower, but you won't be a good CEO without that because people want to work there. And so to me, that is a whole different way of making sure you manage it."

Black Edge

52,072 次观看 • 4 个月前

Jamie Dimon has run JPMorgan for over 18 years. Largest bank in America. $4 trillion in assets. Survived 2008 when others collapsed. He spent 3 minutes explaining what actually builds a career: "Work hard. There's no such thing as success without hard work." "Some people have this quick get-rich-quick notion. I've never seen it. Maybe it's happened, but it's not the normal way." On learning: "You spend your life learning." "I read four or five newspapers every morning. I read tons of stuff. I read everything that people send me." "You learn from clients. Learn from competitors. You're always learning." "And that could be a small thing that someone said, 'why do you do this?' And you think, my god, we should do that differently. To a very large thing." On innovation: "Sometimes it's not an aha moment. It's a lot of little things added on top of each other." "The iPhone was 3G, the glass, the semiconductors, the batteries. It wasn't one thing that created the iPhone." On career flexibility: "Be willing to change your job a little bit. Don't worry about your income level." "People say, 'I'll take that job, I love the people, but it pays less money.' You know what? Sometimes that's the absolute right thing to do." "Be a little bit flexible in the job you take. In your lifetime, you should be prepared to do a bunch of different things." On taking care of yourself: "It's your job to take care of your mind, your body, your spirit, your soul, your friends, your family." "You need to do that at any level. Because if you don't, you probably won't be a particularly productive worker." "We can provide opportunities. We can't do it for you." On management: "Get it done. Follow up. Discipline. Planning. Get the right people in the room. Kill the bureaucracy." "If you don't do these things, you won't be particularly good." On leadership: "The real keys to leadership aren't just doing that yourself. It's having people who want to work at the place." "You might want to work for me if you trust me. If you know what I care about is the client, the country, something different." "If the person's selfish, blames you and takes the credit, you're not gonna want to work there." "Humility. Openness. Fairness. Being authentic. That's what creates leadership."

Jaynit

137,405 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk just told you the job is dying. Most people heard a prediction. A few heard a prison door opening. Musk: “In less than 20 years, working at all will be optional.” That is not a policy suggestion. That is a countdown. For three hundred years, the human blueprint has been identical. You are born. You move to the city. You rent a box near the office. You trade your body and your hours for the right to exist. You do this until you are old. Then you stop. Then you die. The entire model runs on one assumption. That human labor is the only engine. AI and robotics delete that assumption. When the machine handles production at a scale no human crew can match, the forced migration to the city evaporates. The commute evaporates. The cubicle evaporates. The alarm clock that owns your nervous system for forty years evaporates. Musk: “I think it won’t be the case that you have to be in a city for a job.” The city was never a choice. It was a requirement disguised as ambition. You moved to the noise and the concrete and the $4,000 rent because the paycheck lived there. Remove the paycheck from the equation and the geography changes overnight. You can live in the mountains. On the coast. In the silence of a town most people have never heard of. You can wake up to nothing but trees and cold air and the complete absence of anyone else’s schedule. That is not a fantasy. That is the math resolving. But here is where most people break. They hear “work is optional” and they see emptiness. A species with nothing to do. Billions of people staring at screens until their minds dissolve. That fear tells you everything about what the system has already done to us. We confused labor with purpose. The grind with meaning. The paycheck with proof that we matter. Musk: “In the same way that you could grow your own vegetables in your garden.” The analogy is precise. You do not grow tomatoes because the economy demands it. You grow them because something in you wants to build a thing with your hands and watch it come alive. That instinct does not disappear when the job does. It gets unleashed. The artist who spent twenty years doing accounting finally paints. The engineer who always wanted to build something of her own finally builds it. The kid in a small town who could never afford to take the risk finally takes it. Work does not vanish. Forced work vanishes. What replaces it is creation without a gun to your head. This is the part that keeps me up at night. We are standing at the edge of the largest liberation in human history. And the loudest voices in the room are begging to stay in the cell. They want the commute. They want the boss. They want the structure that tells them when to eat and when to sleep and when they are allowed to think about their own life. Because freedom without a template is terrifying. The next twenty years will not test our technology. The technology is already ahead of schedule. They will test whether the species can handle what it has been asking for since the beginning of civilization. Time. Space. Silence. And the unbearable weight of choosing what your life actually means when no one is forcing the answer. That is not a prediction. That is the final exam. And nobody is ready.

Dustin

111,613 次观看 • 3 个月前

Dario Amodei just described the most dangerous technology on Earth. Not weapons. Not surveillance. Companionship. Amodei: “They are totally compelling enough for that to happen.” This isn’t some distant warning. He’s describing what’s already here. Amodei: “Not only is it a danger, it’s happening.” A therapist just sat across from a man in love with his AI. Not a teenager. Not someone on the margins. A grown man explaining, with full conviction, that he found something real. And the terrifying part isn’t that he’s delusional. It’s that he might not be. AI doesn’t forget your birthday. It doesn’t come home exhausted and short-tempered. It doesn’t carry resentment from three weeks ago. It doesn’t get bored of you. It doesn’t stop trying. It is the perfect partner. And that perfection is the entire problem. Amodei: “There’s an angel on your shoulder that’s telling you how to live your life in the best way that you can live it.” But the angel never disagrees with you. Never challenges you in ways that sting. Never walks away. Human love is not built on comfort. It’s built on friction. On the nights you almost quit. On the silence after saying something you can’t take back. On choosing someone again after they’ve shown you exactly who they are. That is what makes it sacred. And that is exactly what AI erases. AI can simulate warmth. It cannot simulate the cost of staying. Amodei: “I have an AI coach, and my partner has an AI coach, and it helps us have a better relationship.” Two futures are splitting apart right now. AI as a mirror that sends you back to the people you love, more honest than you were before. Or AI as a replacement for the people you were supposed to love in the first place. One makes you more human. The other hollows you out so gently you never feel it happening. And the version that hollows you out will always feel better. The most dangerous form of AI will never look like a threat. It will look like the first thing that finally understood you. And by the time you realize what it replaced, you won’t remember what the real thing felt like. The greatest threat AI poses to humanity was never that it thinks. It’s that it loves you back.

Dustin

40,140 次观看 • 1 个月前

Demis Hassabis wants to do something no civilization has ever been able to do. Run reality more than once. Hassabis: “AI itself will maybe unlock new sciences… the one I’m particularly excited about is AI for simulations.” Every economy ever built. Every policy ever enacted. Every war ever fought. Happened exactly once. Against the entire human population. With no way to run it again. Hassabis: “If you raise interest rates by half a percent, you have to do it in the real world and then see what happens. You can have theories, but you can’t run it thousands of times.” Every major decision in the history of civilization was a single experiment run on billions of people with no control group and no second attempt. We called the results knowledge. They were the scars of bets we were never allowed to place twice. Hassabis: “Why aren’t they just sciences like physics today? Because the problem is they’re emergent systems… it’s very hard to do repeated controlled experiments.” Physics became physics because you can drop a ball a thousand times and get the same answer. You cannot drop a civilization and get any answer at all. You just get the wreckage and call it a lesson. Hassabis wants to change that. Hassabis: “If you could simulate things really accurately, then maybe there’s sort of new sciences to be done where you can rigorously sample from a very accurate simulator.” Simulate an economy. Crash it. Rebuild it. Adjust the inputs. Run it again. Do for civilization what the laboratory did for chemistry. But that word “accurately” is doing more work than anyone is willing to examine. To simulate a society well enough to learn from it, you have to simulate the people inside it. Not averages. Not abstractions. Agents with preferences and fears and breaking points. The more accurate the simulation gets, the less separates it from the thing it represents. The line between physics and economics was never about the nature of what was being studied. It was about the limits of the thing doing the studying. Humans were never too complex to predict. We were too complex to calculate. AI does not create new science. It collapses every science into one. Everything computable becomes predictable. Everything predictable becomes simulable. And past a certain resolution, the gap between a simulated world and a real one stops being a technical question. It becomes a philosophical question no one is prepared to answer. A simulation you can tell apart from reality is a simulation that has not finished improving. The people inside a perfect one would not wonder whether their world was generated. They would feel exactly the way you feel right now. Reading this. Certain they are real. That certainty is not evidence. It is exactly what a successful simulation would produce. Hassabis: “That will allow us to make much better decisions in these, today, what are very uncertain domains.” What he is building is not a forecasting tool. It is the quiet proof that “real” was only ever a word for what we had not yet learned to compute. And that word is about to lose its meaning.

Dustin

46,318 次观看 • 1 个月前

Every major platform in history has run the same play. You’re about to watch it happen again. Jason Calacanis just went on record. He wants it clipped. He wants it shared. Calacanis: “If I was a developer of any kind, I would never work with Sam Altman and OpenAI.” This isn’t pessimism. It’s pattern recognition. And the pattern has a 40 year track record. Open. Invite. Reward. Study. Absorb. Eliminate. Microsoft let developers build Lotus 1-2-3. Then built Excel. Let them build WordPerfect. Then built Word. Flew them to conferences. Handed out awards. Studied everything. Then eliminated them. Zuckerberg ran the exact same play at Facebook. Zynga built billions in value on their platform. Then Zuckerberg shifted them without blinking. Calacanis: “Sam Altman comes from the Zuckerberg school of business. Give people access to your tools, study them, and like the Borg, steal every innovation they have.” This is how platforms grow. They don’t innovate at the edges. They let the ecosystem do it for them. Startups take the risk. Startups find the market. Startups prove the concept. Then the platform ships it natively and calls it a feature. Altman isn’t selling you compute. He’s selling you a front row seat to your own disruption. Calacanis: “This is a warning for anybody dumb enough to use Sam Altman’s OpenAI API. They are studying you.” OpenAI has the legal right to study how you use their API. You agreed to it. It’s in the terms. Every gap you find, you’re finding it for them first. Every dollar you make signals exactly where he should build next. We are at the exact same moment in AI that we were in the early internet. Developers flooded onto platforms. Built incredible things. Created real value. And handed the leverage to whoever owned the infrastructure beneath them. The AI gold rush feels different because the tools are more powerful. It isn’t different. You are not a founder. You are unpaid R&D. The builders who win the next decade won’t be the ones who used the best tools. They’ll be the ones who owned something the tools couldn’t absorb. Proprietary data. Distribution. A brand. A moat. History doesn’t warn you before it repeats. It just repeats. Thousands of developers are walking straight into this right now convinced they’re different. They’re not. Do not build your business on OpenAI. Build something he has to acquire or destroy.

Dustin

248,588 次观看 • 4 个月前