Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

#WATCH | Raisina Dialogue 2026 | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "... When we look back at these 70 years, I think the expectation that we can freeze a 1945 or a 1989 forever was a very unrealistic one. In fact, look back at the 70 years. These 70... years, we debate, how did we do, why didn't it last, 70 years is 1% of Indian history. Why would 1% of Indian history last? Life moves on. I think this attachment to the past did not take into account the forces that were propelling the change... If there are going to be two big changes in this decade, one will be technology, but the other will be demographic... A lot of the analysis is obviously centred around the changes in America... My sense is you're going to have a future which will really be much more multipolar because no country today has hegemony over so many domains that it is an overall hegemon. It's not just a distribution of GDP and capabilities. I think in different domains, different parts of the world will contribute more or will have more capabilities. So the power in its different dimensions has spread out much more..."show more

ANI

9,207,308 subscribers

42,615 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education #WATCH

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

#WATCH | Raisina Dialogue 2026 | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "If we have to build a kind of an Indian Ocean sentiment or identity, it has to be backed up with resources, work, commitments, practical projects... There are different dimensions of how you build the Indian Ocean... On why the Indian Ocean is the only ocean named after a country - we are right in the middle of it... With our growth, other countries of the Indian Ocean stand to benefit. Those who work with us will get more benefits... The rise of India will be determined by India... It will be determined by our strength, not by the mistakes of others..."

#WATCH | Raisina Dialogue 2026 | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "If we have to build a kind of an Indian Ocean sentiment or identity, it has to be backed up with resources, work, commitments, practical projects... There are different dimensions of how you build the Indian Ocean... On why the Indian Ocean is the only ocean named after a country - we are right in the middle of it... With our growth, other countries of the Indian Ocean stand to benefit. Those who work with us will get more benefits... The rise of India will be determined by India... It will be determined by our strength, not by the mistakes of others..."

ANI

115,924 views • 6 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On Operation Sindoor, Indian Air Force chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh says, "The main wars that are going on today, be it Russia, Ukraine or the Israel war. They are going on, years have passed, because no one is thinking about conflict termination...We heard that people said that no, we should have done a little more. We stopped the war very quickly. Yes, they were on the back foot, no doubt, but what were our objectives? Our objective was anti-terrorism. We had to strike them. We had done that. So if our objectives have been met, then why should we not terminate a conflict? Why should we carry on? Because any conflict has a lot of price which has to be paid. It will affect our preparedness for the next one. It will affect our economy. It will affect the progress of the country. So, I think this is what the world is forgetting. They do not know what our target was when we started the war. Now their goal post is shifting. Egos are coming in between. And this is where I think the world has to learn a lesson from India how to start and terminate a conflict at the earliest possible opportunity..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Operation Sindoor, Indian Air Force chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh says, "The main wars that are going on today, be it Russia, Ukraine or the Israel war. They are going on, years have passed, because no one is thinking about conflict termination...We heard that people said that no, we should have done a little more. We stopped the war very quickly. Yes, they were on the back foot, no doubt, but what were our objectives? Our objective was anti-terrorism. We had to strike them. We had done that. So if our objectives have been met, then why should we not terminate a conflict? Why should we carry on? Because any conflict has a lot of price which has to be paid. It will affect our preparedness for the next one. It will affect our economy. It will affect the progress of the country. So, I think this is what the world is forgetting. They do not know what our target was when we started the war. Now their goal post is shifting. Egos are coming in between. And this is where I think the world has to learn a lesson from India how to start and terminate a conflict at the earliest possible opportunity..."

ANI

302,975 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Delhi: EAM Dr S Jaishankar, "Look at our response to 26/11 in Mumbai and look at our response to Uri and Balakot. I think nothing can tell you more clearly, more sharply, because, you know, at the end of the day, the armed forces are the same, the bureaucracy is the same, the intelligence is the same. So if you look at what are the structural inputs and responses of the system, it would be the same...Uri and Balakot were meant to demonstrate that no, life will not go on and that there will be a price and don't think because you've done something and run away to that side, that you are safe there. You will not be safe there. It will not be safe across the line of control nor across international borders. So there was a clear, direct message out there and I think the people to whom that message was intended to be sent, hopefully got it."

#WATCH | Delhi: EAM Dr S Jaishankar, "Look at our response to 26/11 in Mumbai and look at our response to Uri and Balakot. I think nothing can tell you more clearly, more sharply, because, you know, at the end of the day, the armed forces are the same, the bureaucracy is the same, the intelligence is the same. So if you look at what are the structural inputs and responses of the system, it would be the same...Uri and Balakot were meant to demonstrate that no, life will not go on and that there will be a price and don't think because you've done something and run away to that side, that you are safe there. You will not be safe there. It will not be safe across the line of control nor across international borders. So there was a clear, direct message out there and I think the people to whom that message was intended to be sent, hopefully got it."

ANI

86,425 views • 2 years ago

#WATCH | On situation in Venezuela, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says, "...Three-fold process in Venezuela. Step 1 is the stabilisation of the country; we don't want it descending into chaos. Part of that stabilisation, and the reason why we understand and believe that we have the strongest leverage possible is our quarantine. Two more ships were seized today. We are in the midst right now and about to execute on a deal to take all the oil - they have oil that is stuck in Venezuela. They can't move it because of our quarantine and because it's sanctioned. We are going to take bwteen 30 and 50 million barrels of oil. We are going to sell it in the market place at market rates, not at the discounts Venezuela was getting. That money will then be handled in such a way that we will control how it is dispersed in a way that benefits the Venezuelan people...The second phase will be a phase of what we call recovery - ensuring that American, western and other companies have access to the Venezuelan market oil that is fair, also at the same time, we begin to create the process of reconciliation nationally within Venezuela so that the Opposition forces can be released from prisons or brought back to the country, and we begin to rebuild civil society. The third phase will be one of transition. Some of these will overlap, I have described this to them in great detail. We will have more detail in the days to follow but we feel like we are moving forward here in a very positive way." (Video Source: Reuters)

#WATCH | On situation in Venezuela, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says, "...Three-fold process in Venezuela. Step 1 is the stabilisation of the country; we don't want it descending into chaos. Part of that stabilisation, and the reason why we understand and believe that we have the strongest leverage possible is our quarantine. Two more ships were seized today. We are in the midst right now and about to execute on a deal to take all the oil - they have oil that is stuck in Venezuela. They can't move it because of our quarantine and because it's sanctioned. We are going to take bwteen 30 and 50 million barrels of oil. We are going to sell it in the market place at market rates, not at the discounts Venezuela was getting. That money will then be handled in such a way that we will control how it is dispersed in a way that benefits the Venezuelan people...The second phase will be a phase of what we call recovery - ensuring that American, western and other companies have access to the Venezuelan market oil that is fair, also at the same time, we begin to create the process of reconciliation nationally within Venezuela so that the Opposition forces can be released from prisons or brought back to the country, and we begin to rebuild civil society. The third phase will be one of transition. Some of these will overlap, I have described this to them in great detail. We will have more detail in the days to follow but we feel like we are moving forward here in a very positive way." (Video Source: Reuters)

ANI

23,143 views • 8 months ago

Warren Buffett: "[Berkshire Hathaway] will always be moving somewhat, but it will be mostly expanding. We will have companies that 50-100 years from now will not be viable in the economy of that world. But we'll have a whole lot more that develop over the years." "Greg [Abel] understands more businesses, in a sense, than I do ... If you ask me whether I know much about the companies that are being formed today, the answer is no."

Warren Buffett: "[Berkshire Hathaway] will always be moving somewhat, but it will be mostly expanding. We will have companies that 50-100 years from now will not be viable in the economy of that world. But we'll have a whole lot more that develop over the years." "Greg [Abel] understands more businesses, in a sense, than I do ... If you ask me whether I know much about the companies that are being formed today, the answer is no."

Kevin Carpenter

25,336 views • 8 months ago

#WATCH | Pune, Maharashtra: EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "Brain drain is a very complex issue... I see today a global opening for Indian talent, in fact, just now we had President Putin. One of the agreements we did was that he was keen to get Indians to come and work in Russia. When I look at the demography of the world, I look at Europe. Even though there's an immigration debate in Europe, Indians are well regarded...So there is today a global brand of Indians. It's a good brand. We have built it over the years. I would say young people should take advantage of it. Take advantage of it and look at the world as a global workplace..."

ANI

85,698 views • 9 months ago

This is a combination of Steve Jobs’ (1) The storyteller is the most powerful person in the world and Jeff Bezos’ (2) Invest in things that won’t change: “A company is just a fiction You make some filing and you say "We're a corporation today even though we're just two people sitting around a couch and we have a few dollars in a bank account.” And if these fictions are intended to grow to tens of thousands of people it should be because there is some common purpose. There is something that in aggregate, the sum of the parts of all the people working together should be able to move something further than anyone alone could do. And the role of a leader is to go and assert how will we measure ourselves? If we are seeking to be our best and get better every day how should we think about that, and how can we understand our forward progress? I don't know what Ramp will look like exactly in 100 years but I think just as it was true 100 years ago people always wanted more out of every dollar and more out of every hour, I think people will absolutely still want that in 100 years —in whatever form that may take.”

This is a combination of Steve Jobs’ (1) The storyteller is the most powerful person in the world and Jeff Bezos’ (2) Invest in things that won’t change: “A company is just a fiction You make some filing and you say "We're a corporation today even though we're just two people sitting around a couch and we have a few dollars in a bank account.” And if these fictions are intended to grow to tens of thousands of people it should be because there is some common purpose. There is something that in aggregate, the sum of the parts of all the people working together should be able to move something further than anyone alone could do. And the role of a leader is to go and assert how will we measure ourselves? If we are seeking to be our best and get better every day how should we think about that, and how can we understand our forward progress? I don't know what Ramp will look like exactly in 100 years but I think just as it was true 100 years ago people always wanted more out of every dollar and more out of every hour, I think people will absolutely still want that in 100 years —in whatever form that may take.”

David Senra

30,741 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Shamika Ravi, Member, Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, says, "We will remain the fastest growing economy in the world despite all global upheavals. We are all watching carefully how things are unfolding in West Asia. But also because India today, structurally is a very different country. We have a very large segment, almost 90% of urban markets, where people use LPG. In the rural market, that number is also close to 60%... I think there is sufficient planning. So there is no reason for any kind of panic, because we have had expectations. The Ukraine war has been going on now for more than four years. I think India's growth, unfortunately, in the last 10 years has been subjected to all kinds of global shocks. But despite that, I think we are managing fairly well. Our growth is not just high, but more importantly, stable with inflation, which has remained within the threshold of what the RBI sets for inflation targeting.."

#WATCH | Delhi: Shamika Ravi, Member, Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, says, "We will remain the fastest growing economy in the world despite all global upheavals. We are all watching carefully how things are unfolding in West Asia. But also because India today, structurally is a very different country. We have a very large segment, almost 90% of urban markets, where people use LPG. In the rural market, that number is also close to 60%... I think there is sufficient planning. So there is no reason for any kind of panic, because we have had expectations. The Ukraine war has been going on now for more than four years. I think India's growth, unfortunately, in the last 10 years has been subjected to all kinds of global shocks. But despite that, I think we are managing fairly well. Our growth is not just high, but more importantly, stable with inflation, which has remained within the threshold of what the RBI sets for inflation targeting.."

ANI

41,857 views • 6 months ago

🚨Governor DeSantis pitches Federal Balanced Budget Amendment to Kentucky Legislature. Kentucky will be the 29th of 34 States needed to send the Amendment back to the States for ratification. “We're $38+ TRILLION in debt and it is escalating very quickly every day. We now spend more on interest just to service the debt than we do on national defense, and those numbers are going to escalate as some of these bonds have to be refinance in the future. I'm proud to be a Republican. This is not a Democrat problem, or this is a bipartisan debt problem. So Florida has obviously certified this. 28 States in total have. We've got a couple more that we think will happen relatively soon. Kentucky hopefully would be one of those. The reason I'm here is because I don't think Congress is going to fix itself. I think the incentives up there are such that we're likely to continue more of the same. There's a culture that's developed. There's a muscle memory that's developed. And you can't just say elect new people and all of a sudden they're going to fix it because here's the deal. Even if somehow we did elect new people and they did fix it, the next Congress can come in and undo it. And so unless you have changes, permanent constitutional changes to the incentive structure in Congress, you are not going to solve this problem. And the question is, how much more can you go into debt before we have a major debt crisis? I mean, at some point. Reality is going to bite, and I think the U.S. has been able to get away with this longer just because we're the best bet in town. Whatever problems we have, a lot of these other countries have other problems. But so why would you guys want to be involved at the state level? Because that's what our founding fathers envision. This is America's 250th anniversary of independence, and obviously it took them a decade or so to fashion a Constitution. But when they created the Constitution, they believed that the states were the most important units of government. They were creating a federal government, but it was limited and enumerated to certain tasks. There were local governments created by the state governments, but ultimately was the states that created the federal government and that ratified the Constitution. So they saw the states having a very, very important role. What about with constitutional amendments? Well, I think we just think muscle memory is, well, yeah, Congress proposes these amendments. You need two thirds of each house. They can propose it, and then it goes to the states for ratification. That's one way to propose it. The other way to propose it is via the states with Article V, and you have two thirds of the state certified. A proposal can be fashioned, and then it can go to the states for ratification. The founders knew that Congress could be the problem. So they obviously wanted to provide a mechanism for we, the people working through our states to be able to institute the reforms that would be necessary. We have the power to do it in our states. Many states have stepped up, and obviously I think Kentucky would be a great, great candidate to join the movement to prevent Congress from bankrupting this country. And if we can do that, that'll be one of the best things these states have ever done.”

🚨Governor DeSantis pitches Federal Balanced Budget Amendment to Kentucky Legislature. Kentucky will be the 29th of 34 States needed to send the Amendment back to the States for ratification. “We're $38+ TRILLION in debt and it is escalating very quickly every day. We now spend more on interest just to service the debt than we do on national defense, and those numbers are going to escalate as some of these bonds have to be refinance in the future. I'm proud to be a Republican. This is not a Democrat problem, or this is a bipartisan debt problem. So Florida has obviously certified this. 28 States in total have. We've got a couple more that we think will happen relatively soon. Kentucky hopefully would be one of those. The reason I'm here is because I don't think Congress is going to fix itself. I think the incentives up there are such that we're likely to continue more of the same. There's a culture that's developed. There's a muscle memory that's developed. And you can't just say elect new people and all of a sudden they're going to fix it because here's the deal. Even if somehow we did elect new people and they did fix it, the next Congress can come in and undo it. And so unless you have changes, permanent constitutional changes to the incentive structure in Congress, you are not going to solve this problem. And the question is, how much more can you go into debt before we have a major debt crisis? I mean, at some point. Reality is going to bite, and I think the U.S. has been able to get away with this longer just because we're the best bet in town. Whatever problems we have, a lot of these other countries have other problems. But so why would you guys want to be involved at the state level? Because that's what our founding fathers envision. This is America's 250th anniversary of independence, and obviously it took them a decade or so to fashion a Constitution. But when they created the Constitution, they believed that the states were the most important units of government. They were creating a federal government, but it was limited and enumerated to certain tasks. There were local governments created by the state governments, but ultimately was the states that created the federal government and that ratified the Constitution. So they saw the states having a very, very important role. What about with constitutional amendments? Well, I think we just think muscle memory is, well, yeah, Congress proposes these amendments. You need two thirds of each house. They can propose it, and then it goes to the states for ratification. That's one way to propose it. The other way to propose it is via the states with Article V, and you have two thirds of the state certified. A proposal can be fashioned, and then it can go to the states for ratification. The founders knew that Congress could be the problem. So they obviously wanted to provide a mechanism for we, the people working through our states to be able to institute the reforms that would be necessary. We have the power to do it in our states. Many states have stepped up, and obviously I think Kentucky would be a great, great candidate to join the movement to prevent Congress from bankrupting this country. And if we can do that, that'll be one of the best things these states have ever done.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

366,207 views • 7 months ago

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

David Perell

86,765 views • 1 year ago

Jeff Dean says he's bullish on specialized hardware because a handful of workloads will be a lot of the world's compute "I'm pretty bullish on more and more specialized hardware, because I think that's the way you really get much more efficient systems." "And we now have workloads where there's like a handful of workloads that are going to be a lot of the compute in the world." "And so if you think about that, that is crying out for specialization." "The problem with specialization is if what you want to do changes in the future, then the thing you've lovingly crafted in hardware for maybe two years is no longer perhaps as relevant."

Jeff Dean says he's bullish on specialized hardware because a handful of workloads will be a lot of the world's compute "I'm pretty bullish on more and more specialized hardware, because I think that's the way you really get much more efficient systems." "And we now have workloads where there's like a handful of workloads that are going to be a lot of the compute in the world." "And so if you think about that, that is crying out for specialization." "The problem with specialization is if what you want to do changes in the future, then the thing you've lovingly crafted in hardware for maybe two years is no longer perhaps as relevant."

Fireside Alpha

37,058 views • 8 days ago

Nick Wright says we will look back on the LaMelo Ball trade, similar to Dame Lillard going to Milwaukee that was the first big domino in the superstar asking out: “I think in two years when one of the big topics is Minnesota going to trade Anthony Edwards, that will be because this last week of moves has blown up on them.” (Via What’s Wright? with Nick Wright)

Nick Wright says we will look back on the LaMelo Ball trade, similar to Dame Lillard going to Milwaukee that was the first big domino in the superstar asking out: “I think in two years when one of the big topics is Minnesota going to trade Anthony Edwards, that will be because this last week of moves has blown up on them.” (Via What’s Wright? with Nick Wright)

NBA Courtside

105,763 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On former CDS Anil Chauhan's statement, foreign affairs expert Sushant Sareen said, "...the political direction was very clear to the armed forces that: the era of turning the other cheek is gone and if the Pakistanis are going to carry out acts of terrorism, then they will have to be responded to with the might of the Indian state... On the issue of the Kirana Hills... everybody knows what India did out there. I remember that press conference of the DGMOs where the Air Force officer, Air Marshal Bharti had in a very tongue-in-cheek remark said, 'we didn't know what Kirana Hills is all about'. Quite clearly, you know, we know what Kirana Hills was all about. I think it was a message which was being delivered to the Pakistanis that we have them in our sights... if you look at the footage of the strike on Kirana Hills, it's very clear that it's probably not a loitering munition. But maybe from what the CDS has said... the message is that... we had the capabilities of sending loitering munitions as far as Sargodha, which is one of the main air bases of the Pakistan Air Force. And they were roaming around out there without any let or hindrance... Clearly the message is that if we wanted, we could have wreaked more havoc on your air bases than what we did. And if we did not do it, it was deliberate. So the message is to the Pakistanis is that don't try any adventurism. We had full dominance over you in Operation Sindoor... So, I think that messaging, it is a very clear kind of strategic messaging which has gone. Let us hope that it has its salutary impact, otherwise it will have a kinetic impact." (26.08)

#WATCH | Delhi: On former CDS Anil Chauhan's statement, foreign affairs expert Sushant Sareen said, "...the political direction was very clear to the armed forces that: the era of turning the other cheek is gone and if the Pakistanis are going to carry out acts of terrorism, then they will have to be responded to with the might of the Indian state... On the issue of the Kirana Hills... everybody knows what India did out there. I remember that press conference of the DGMOs where the Air Force officer, Air Marshal Bharti had in a very tongue-in-cheek remark said, 'we didn't know what Kirana Hills is all about'. Quite clearly, you know, we know what Kirana Hills was all about. I think it was a message which was being delivered to the Pakistanis that we have them in our sights... if you look at the footage of the strike on Kirana Hills, it's very clear that it's probably not a loitering munition. But maybe from what the CDS has said... the message is that... we had the capabilities of sending loitering munitions as far as Sargodha, which is one of the main air bases of the Pakistan Air Force. And they were roaming around out there without any let or hindrance... Clearly the message is that if we wanted, we could have wreaked more havoc on your air bases than what we did. And if we did not do it, it was deliberate. So the message is to the Pakistanis is that don't try any adventurism. We had full dominance over you in Operation Sindoor... So, I think that messaging, it is a very clear kind of strategic messaging which has gone. Let us hope that it has its salutary impact, otherwise it will have a kinetic impact." (26.08)

ANI

39,989 views • 29 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Union Minister for Petroleum and Natural Gas, Hardeep Singh Puri, says, "We have no supply-side problems. Today, the country has more than enough stocks of crude oil, LNG and LPG. When this crisis began, there were some concerns, but we converted the challenge into an opportunity. We have ramped up our domestic production of LPG, which used to be 36,000 metric tons per day. We have now taken it up to 54,000 metric tons per day. You must have seen that there are no shortages anywhere. In the last four years, there has been no increase in prices. We don't know how long the blockades or counter-blockades in the Strait of Hormuz will continue. But I can tell you categorically that today we are in a situation where, unlike other countries in the world, which have had to either face severe problems in terms of availability and supply or where prices have gone up 50-60 per cent. The Prime Minister's statement is very visionary. It looks to the future that if this were to continue, we also have to look at what we can do in terms of lifestyle changes. It's not that something is going to happen. That's all negative, panic-creating activity. I review the situation every day, along with the CMDs of the oil sector for an hour or an hour and a half. There is absolutely no cause for anxiety. My oil companies are losing 1000 crores a day. So we will have to start worrying about these things. Some demand for LPG has come down. It used to be 90,000 metric tons. It has come down to 75. Some of it is because of the temperature. But even otherwise, I think the prudent supply and demand side, we have done very well, and I have no reason to believe that we will not do well in the future. Please listen to what the Prime Minister said, and it's a very visionary statement."

#WATCH | Delhi: Union Minister for Petroleum and Natural Gas, Hardeep Singh Puri, says, "We have no supply-side problems. Today, the country has more than enough stocks of crude oil, LNG and LPG. When this crisis began, there were some concerns, but we converted the challenge into an opportunity. We have ramped up our domestic production of LPG, which used to be 36,000 metric tons per day. We have now taken it up to 54,000 metric tons per day. You must have seen that there are no shortages anywhere. In the last four years, there has been no increase in prices. We don't know how long the blockades or counter-blockades in the Strait of Hormuz will continue. But I can tell you categorically that today we are in a situation where, unlike other countries in the world, which have had to either face severe problems in terms of availability and supply or where prices have gone up 50-60 per cent. The Prime Minister's statement is very visionary. It looks to the future that if this were to continue, we also have to look at what we can do in terms of lifestyle changes. It's not that something is going to happen. That's all negative, panic-creating activity. I review the situation every day, along with the CMDs of the oil sector for an hour or an hour and a half. There is absolutely no cause for anxiety. My oil companies are losing 1000 crores a day. So we will have to start worrying about these things. Some demand for LPG has come down. It used to be 90,000 metric tons. It has come down to 75. Some of it is because of the temperature. But even otherwise, I think the prudent supply and demand side, we have done very well, and I have no reason to believe that we will not do well in the future. Please listen to what the Prime Minister said, and it's a very visionary statement."

ANI

51,182 views • 4 months ago

Jordi Visser doubts the Anthropic IPO will happen at all after the last 72 hours, let alone at $3T "First of all, I think a story that will be developing is, will they actually be doing an IPO, based on what they've done in the last seventy two hours?" "When you have a former employee leave and say the world's gonna end, and then you have his boss come out and endorse the statement, during a quiet period for the company." "The number one risk with these companies is, like any company that can have liability against them, if there's going to be hackings and you come out and sue them, how is that going to be handled? So investors are going to have a lot more questions." "If they do do it, I don't think you're going to get the three trillion dollar valuation they thought, and I think they're going to have to disclose a lot of this stuff. So it may be delayed because of this. I don't know how much of this was orchestrated, I don't know how much was a mistake, but it definitely seems like there's going to have to be some changes in the IPO in terms of the approach."

Jordi Visser doubts the Anthropic IPO will happen at all after the last 72 hours, let alone at $3T "First of all, I think a story that will be developing is, will they actually be doing an IPO, based on what they've done in the last seventy two hours?" "When you have a former employee leave and say the world's gonna end, and then you have his boss come out and endorse the statement, during a quiet period for the company." "The number one risk with these companies is, like any company that can have liability against them, if there's going to be hackings and you come out and sue them, how is that going to be handled? So investors are going to have a lot more questions." "If they do do it, I don't think you're going to get the three trillion dollar valuation they thought, and I think they're going to have to disclose a lot of this stuff. So it may be delayed because of this. I don't know how much of this was orchestrated, I don't know how much was a mistake, but it definitely seems like there's going to have to be some changes in the IPO in terms of the approach."

The Wolf Of All Streets

35,173 views • 11 days ago