Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Watch SpyTalk: Intelligence for Thinking People 🕵🏼‍♀️ clip with hosts Jeff Stein, Karen Greenberg & Michael Isikoff #SpyTalk #MSWMedia #ReuelGerech

12,743 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

"There's something called a break glass moment. We are way past that with this new civil complaint from Stoughton Police Chief Donna McNamara. Watch who now goes away. Watch who now starts openly railing on Karen Read and Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney (which is the most obvious tell that they were stoolies). If anyone just disappears they are the 'last of the stoolies.' It's almost over. We are right at the end. Last night, the powers that be would have had to tell these people, 'listen, if you stay, and keep running this operation, if you are still involved with us, you're going down with us. We're all going down at this point, so you need to get off now or you're going down with us.' And, frankly, they can't bring most of these people down with them. They are liabilities." "Now, listen, the big tells that people were part of this operation targeting Aidan or Karen are thus: they were at one point pro-Aidan or pro-Karen (or some combination of the two), but now have the opposite position. Second, they linked up Karen and Aidan under false pretenses. Thirdly, they stole information in an attempt to hurt Aidan or Karen (or both). Fourthly, they leave the state when stuff goes bad. Fifthly, they have some connection to Florida, or people in Florida or Sean On The Gulf. Look at everyone who Sean was talking to in and around July of 2023, those are your moles."- Towel I dropped some gems yesterday, apparently. Here are some important quotes: "You run that kind of blackmail operation anywhere in the orbit of something I'm covering, and you're going to find out a lot more is going to come out about you than you intended to expose about your target. Also, these tactics are disgusting. Either be good, or be good at it." "Do you understand, the fact that intelligence community tactics popped up around Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney and Karen Read --with them being the target of those tactics-- should tell you all you need to know. It's because this blackmail network thought they were going to go down, and they thought either Karen, or Aidan, was going to expose them. It turns out that it was a lot of people that brought them down." "If they can't get you intro a compromising situation sexually, or fiscally, or with drugs, then they'll fake it. They'll create a Truman Show-style alterative reality game (ARG) and put people in your life until you do something stupid. And you won't even realize it because they prey on people's better nature. And, worse, they prey on people's hearts. If I see you one run operative on the basis of fake emotional manipulation, I'll get ya' juridically. I'll get ya' and I'll drag you in front of the entire world. I'll have you dragged in front of Congress and you can answer questions for the American public about why you think it's appropriate to treat human lives, and human hearts, as a job." "And then you can answer to the American public why you --whether for private, public or otherwise purposes-- were abusing the psychological state of my fellow citizens to advance your blackmail ops. It ends now." "It is very likely that some of these people are private intelligence operatives. Not public intelligence operatives. What we are talking about here are NOC's. That means non-official cover. A private NOC would be a private intelligence operative, with a fake job, actually going around and getting information for the purposes of whoever has hired them for that job." "Academics are often NOC's, financial traders are often NOC's, journalists are often NOC's. Okay? This is a traditional intelligence community tactic that get's what's called laundered, or sheep dipped, into the private intelligence world." "Now, to sheep dip and asset would be to say, for example, you were a local cop in Boston, or a state cop in Massachusetts, or a federal agent, and you had an informant network that were either NOC's or people you were blackmailing to force them to be your informant (bringing them into family court, or humiliating them, or charging them with crimes, whatever). Let's say you had that informant network that went back years, and let's say as a result of that network existing, let's say you opened a private intelligence firm. You would then what's called "sheep dip" the informants. You would take all these informants that you had from your time as, for example, a Boston cop or a state cop, maybe in Medford, Somerville, Attleboro, whatever...you would take your informant network and sheep dip them into private intelligence informants. What that means is that you have to give them cover. And, you know, lot's of people run private intelligence firms that might know about this kind of thing...Marty Kraft, Brian Albert....even a federal agent like Brian Higgins would probably know about sheep dipping informants like this. So, anyway, you would sheep dip your informants and then would run them." "The classic way you would run something like this is called COINTELPRO. And that, by the book, would involve disrupting, disorganizing and destroying social movements. Although COINTELPRO is incredibly illegal, it was originally designed to break up militant domestic political movements that were a threat to the existing social, political and civic order in the mid 20th century. If you want to break these guys up, you run COINTELPRO on them. Disrupt, disorganize, destroy. You get inside their movements with informants, you psychologically manipulate them through conditioned public narrative, you use the press to alienate their standing in the public discourse, and then you nail on them. You choke their entire structure until they cannot function and then you, ideally, if you want to take them over, you repurpose the movement for your own purposes. Or you could just destroy them and scatter the movement in a million little pieces to the wind, depending on what you need the operation to accomplish." "That's what they did to the Free Karen Read movement. That's what they did to Aidan Kearney's movement. That's why you got to have good operational security if you're Aidan or Karen. You gotta' do background checks. Take no one at face value and, also, assume that people moving to get close to you are moles. Give them nothing. "Trust but verify" is not just a phrase that Ronald Reagan used, and that I rehashed (and that Kate Peter stole to try to look erudite because she's worthless, and couldn't be me on her best day). Okay? It's an actual operational security tactic designed to confirm that the people around you are not double agents." "That's what's really going on here. We have sheep dipped informants, who were brought over to the private intelligence world (either via blackmail, or being paid off, whatever), and they've been working for years in what's called deep-cover roles where they are acting. The personas that they have out there are fake. And then they get close to Karen, or Aidan, or both, and they have roles. They are actually working. And then they're either trying to sow confusing, distract people from Proctorgate, distract people from the Sandra Birchmore coverup, divide, as I said, Aidan and Karen's movements, expose Karen and Aidan to civil and criminal liability, threaten them with bail revocations. It's kind of like these pressure tactics --they are very dirty, they are unfair, they are constitutionally impermissible-- in order to pressure people psychologically. It's called a control drama." "By the way, a lot of these men and women (who participated in those private intelligence operations targeting Aidan and Karen) are about to fall. There's only a few left. There's maybe 3-5 long cover moles left. Last week there were 10. Now it's down to 3-5. The funding must be gone, because the people who were bailing were in there for years. Somebody must have pulled the money out. Somebody got a little but concerned, clearly, that this operation is gonna' get blown." "Now, the people involved are kind of just left dealing with the fallout. The paymasters did not help the on-the-ground operatives. And the people involved should have known better. If you're an intelligence asset, and it goes back, it's called plausible deniability. They don't know you, they never met you, and you don't know them. These people are left in the dust right now. I can tell. They literally abandoned them, which is the worst position to be in as an intel asset, because you were only able to move the way you did because of your institutional protection. Now you got nothin'." "Professional intelligence operatives have loyalty to country. They say loyal, and you will never find out what they're doing, because they love this country. Private intelligence operatives are like mercenaries. They'll chase the money, and they have no loyalty to anyone. In fact, do you know the four things you look for when recruiting an intelligence asset? Tell me if this rings any bells; Mental instability, disaffected former employee, drive for money and ideology. Checking any boxes for anyone?" "There's something called a break glass moment. We are way past that with this new civil complaint from Stoughton Police Chief Donna McNamara. Watch who now goes away. Watch who now starts openly railing on Karen Read and Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney (which is the most obvious tell that they were stoolies). If anyone just disappears they are the 'last of the stoolies.' It's almost over. We are right at the end. Last night, the powers that be would have had to tell these people, 'listen, if you stay, and keep running this operation, if you are still involved with us, you're going down with us. We're all going down at this point, so you need to get off now or you're going down with us.' And, frankly, they can't bring most of these people down with them. They are liabilities." "Now, listen, the big tells that people were part of this operation targeting Aidan or Karen are thus: they were at one point pro-Aidan or pro-Karen (or some combination of the two), but now have the opposite position. Second, they linked up Karen and Aidan under false pretenses. Thirdly, they stole information in an attempt to hurt Aidan or Karen (or both). Fourthly, they leave the state when stuff goes bad. Fifthly, they have some connection to Florida, or people in Florida or Sean On The Gulf. Look at everyone who Sean was talking to in and around July of 2023, those are your moles." "I don't know what Karen Read and John O'Keefe were on to in Canton in 2021 entirely, but I know John O'Keefe was most certainly on to distribution of narcotics in Canton and John was a member of an undercover Boston Police unit that did stings related to abuse of children. So, you know, don't underestimate Karen Read. Real G's move in silence. She's got stones and street smarts. And I sense she wants to start a foundation to expose vulnerable people being abuse by intermeshed, systemic, police, prosecutorial and juridical corruption. She's ever said anything to me, but that's what I sense she's going for. She's fascinating."

Grant Smith Ellis

25,334 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Michael Seibel on how to get and test startup ideas As the former CEO of Y Combinator puts it in the clip below: “There’s a common misconception that your idea has to be great to start a company, and the first thing I want to do is destroy that misconception.” Michael was one of the cofounders of JustinTV, which later become Twitch and sold to Amazon for almost $1B. Their original idea was to create an online reality TV show—very different from where Twitch eventually ended up. Rather than falling for the trap of thinking that your initial startup idea has to be great, Michael advises founders to start with a problem: “Starting with ideas is tricky because people immediately want to grade your idea. It’s a lot easier to start with a problem and think about how you grade a problem.” Ideally the problem you set out to solve is one you've experienced personally or have some sort of connection to. You should ask yourself: “why am I uniquely qualified to work on this problem?” Is there some unique angle or approach you're taking to the problem that you understand but you don't believe others understand? Peter Thiel argues that “great companies have secrets: specific reasons for success that other people don’t see." After identifying a problem, you’ll want to start thinking about your MVP. What's the first solution you're going to build and release to see if you can help your initial users solve this problem? But don’t fall in love with your MVP. As Michael puts it: “A lot of people fall in love with their product and are not in love with their problem or their customer. I advise the opposite. Be in love with your problem. Be in love with your customer. And treat your product in a way that can change, develop, and improve.” And once you have an MVP, you should have a strong opinion about who your initial customer is and handpick all of your initial users. The goal with an MVP is not to see how many people want to use your product. It's to see if your solution actually solves the problem for your initial target customers. “The best startups very heavily filter the people who are able to use the initial product and make sure that they’re the right type of initial customer.”

Startup Archive

101,023 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce