Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
🧬🤐 Watch the Liberals scramble to silence Canada’s Chief Science Advisor while she tries to answer what the definition of a woman is. They say they follow the science… until the science answers the question.
532,812 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
32 Kommentare

“Asking what is a man or a woman is highly offensive” — MP Danko. And thus we continue down the path of labelling biological reality a “thoughtcrime.”

"Asking what is a man or a woman is highly offensive" — @JohnPaulDanko same government that demands job applicants to answer a bunch of demographic questions for Equity reasons

Keep on asking the questions Mr. Ho. Canada has been trying to change the official definition of woman for the last 10 years and it does not comport with reality. We cannot have any program to benefit women if we don't define who the women are.

Good work! This is hilarious and very alarming how high the gender identity brain rot goes in Canadian society...

If you think federal Liberal DEI policies should be dismantled and merit restored, sign here:

Very good Vincent, except Canada needs a new science advisor. Female birds are not defined by XX. They are defined by ZW. And female alligators are not defined by chromosomes at all. Males and females are defined by gamete type. This is true across the entirety of anisogamy—plants and animals. Males produce small gametes. Females produce large gametes. Sex is defined as the body plan (phenotype) that produces large or small gametes.

Well done, Vincent!

The definition of ‘woman’ “is highly offensive”?

Thank you Vincent! These people have clearly lost their collective minds. It was so easy for them to forget completely that women exist. Absolute misogynists thinking they’re doing “human rights.”

Asking ‘What is a woman?’ should not be treated as insulting or hateful. Yet biological women were never asked before the definition of our sex was changed. Our language was erased in the process, men were allowed to become ‘women,’ and we were reduced to a subordinate category. Gender ideology is profoundly misogynistic and homophobic - the most regressive movement thrust upon women and children in modern times.

Thinking further of this absurd exchange that Vincent Ho had with this group of pandering Liberals who refused to answer “what is the definition of a women?,” perhaps we should designate the Progress Pride flag symbol as a hate symbol? After all, calling out hate seems to have become fashionable with the Liberals today and many of us see that flag as a symbol of “misogynistic narcissism”—a banner of hatred toward women.

“It’s pride month and this is highly offensive!” These people are insufferable.

Telling 5 year olds they may be born in the wrong body is child abuse. Objecting to the biological definition of women during pride season is misogyny. Women are adult human females, not a costume to be worn by men with fetishes.

This:

As an actual woman, I’d love to stop being erased by pseudo intellectuals.

Faux feminist Liberals getting upset at a clarifying question on the definition of a woman, but not at the degradation of women's rights, in women's spaces, sports, and women's prisons

Incorrect answers get you a job as Canada's science advisor, while expertise (and common sense) gets you fired from Harvard.

The Liberals are so ideologically driven that they are offended by biological reality. Never vote for a government that lies to you and wants to censor the truth. The liberals are an absolute clown show 🤡🇨🇦

Keep going. The more average Canadians see the nonsense the more this becomes a winning issue @CPC_HQ

Wow. How dare he ask a scientific advisor a science question.

Well done, Mr. Ho.

@Blueyes9445 Look at how many people are in that room debating on what constitutes a woman LOL. Every single asshat in that room knows exactly what a woman is but is too whipped, cucked or other to answer honestly. What a gong show & a waste of so many tax dollars. Bring back rationale

@CanTrueCrime

A point of order because an MP asked a scientist to define "woman"? What reality are we living in?

@AndrewScheidl lol you asked what a woman was and somehow this is offensive to pride? Get fucked

Cpc definitions of woman is milk maid, mother, servant & brood mare, sit the fuck down homophobic misogynistic wanker

@JojoRRuba MP Danko thought the question was offensive? Women think it’s offensive that men claim to be women.

What a circus, I can’t believe they really said ‘don’t answer that, it’s Pride Month’ They don’t want to hear the science, they just want to hear compliance.

My MP, John Paul Danko, deserves to be defeated in the next election.

Why is anyone asking that inane question other than to rage farm? Seriously, isn’t there something of merit you could focus on? Something that is going to improve the lives of Canadians. I’m guessing we don’t matter if that’s where @CPC_HQ minions are going to put their efforts.

When did Conservatives decide to be so concerned about what's in other people's pants? What a bunch of loons.

Carney's kid is trans! It's only going to get worse.
