Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 WATCH THE SCRIPT COLLAPSE — LIVE ON AIR Australia’s Prime Minister was just confronted with the question that keeps coming back: Have you actually taken antisemitism seriously — and can you guarantee the safety of Jewish Australians? The answer was familiar. Committees. Envoys. Consultations. Process. And that’s the...

335,533 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Let’s just get this straight. Anti-Zionism is antisemitism. Antisemitism is not just racism or hatred. It’s a shape-shifting conspiracy theory. And every few generations it changes into something different. Now people are literally saying, oh, we’ll just get rid of Israel and everything will be fine. It shifts into something different, in which takes everything bad that was said about the Jews, everything that you attributed to the Jews as the worst thing in history, instead of on the Jews, onto Israel. And they attribute the same bloodthirstiness, the same untrustworthiness, the same desire to control and power. Literally take the word Jew and swap it with IDF. They’re standing on the footsteps of colleges in America and they are rehashing. They think they have this new, they found this new cause and unbeknown to them, first of all, they’re rehashing antisemitic tropes from like the 1500s, right? And that obsession that they aren’t even aware of is what allowed for October 7th and October 8th to happen. And that is something that we need to be very careful about, because they’re after taking Israel down. And that would be if they will succeed, and they won’t. But they’re after that. And that is the possible new Holocaust. That would be the calamity of the Jewish people of our generation. And it’s masked as this like, I’m not antisemitic, I’m just an anti-Zionist. No. Antisemitism in a new face. We have to be very careful of it.

Noa Tishby

309,614 views • 1 year ago

Thank you, Katherine Loftus (NoteMyObjection), for confirming that your cousin Molly works as a victim witness advocate in the Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office. That’s relevant context for viewers as they evaluate your content and consider any potential bias. As for the rest, this is being framed as something it isn’t. When you position yourself as an ā€œunapologetically honestā€ legal voice and platform witnesses, transparency is crucial. You don’t get to benefit from that credibility while dismissing reasonable questions about bias as ā€œmalicious.ā€ And to be clear, my video does not meet any legal definition of malice. Criticism one may not like does not equate to maliciousness. As an attorney, you know this. You say you don’t use sources, but relationships, proximity, and access are relevant whether you choose to label them that way or not. That’s reality, especially when you’re speaking on cases tied to the same office your family is connected to. Again, that’s not an attack, it is however context your audience deserves. You also stated in your interview that having a strong opinion in this case leads people to attack looks instead of substance. Yet in your most recent video, you did exactly that. I don’t go there, because it’s not my style. I hold myself to a higher standard than reducing an argument to personal attacks, especially when the criticism is about substance, not appearance. So the claim that ā€œthis sideā€ avoids substance doesn’t really hold up when you’re doing the opposite. As for the block, I explicitly stated in my video why I blocked you: mocking what I went through and continue to deal with. I believe in being transparent with my audience. What is hypocritical, though, is deciding some people are victims of harassment while others are experiencing the same things (home visits, employer calls, public confrontations, threats) are dismissed as ā€œdrama.ā€ It’s also notable that in your interview with Kerry, none of that behavior was addressed. Perhaps next time do a little more research into the person you’re interviewing? Many of us are dying to know why your interviewee was calling herself and Jen McCabe ā€œdetectives,ā€ and why a victim witness advocate out of the same DA’s office referred to them as ā€œthe best detectives around.ā€

BoozeyBeauty

42,758 views • 4 months ago