Video yĂŒkleniyor...

Video YĂŒklenemedi

🚹Watch this Kamala Harris surrogate absolutely implode when Sandra Smith asks her what is Kamala’s plan to lower prices: Sandra Smith: “What is Harris’s plan? We’re waiting.” Kamala surrogate: “There’s a lot of aspects to it in regards to looking at in online. Let’s talk about lowering the grocery...

2,077,572 görĂŒntĂŒleme ‱ 1 yıl önce ‱via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Steve Cortes profil fotoğrafı
Steve Cortes1 yıl önce

Kamala is pathetic and anti-Catholic.

Terry profil fotoğrafı
Terry1 yıl önce

Great job Sandra Smith. Kamala’s surrogate was even dumber than her boss. The fact she pulled the woman on woman card when you were just asking a valid question was so pathetic. Groceries and food have a 1.7% profit margin. There is no price gouging just failed Harris and Biden policies

fixnow profil fotoğrafı
fixnow1 yıl önce

@SandraSmithFox Sandra was so polite to her despite the surrogate being an obvious imbecile

SeldenGADawgs profil fotoğrafı
SeldenGADawgs1 yıl önce

@SandraSmithFox This woman was as clueless & rambling as Kamala! It MUST be a requirement for a job đŸ€ŁđŸ€ŁđŸ€Ł

Patriot Erin profil fotoğrafı
Patriot Erin1 yıl önce

@SandraSmithFox OMG. The only people dỄmber than these m0r0ns are the id!ots who vote for them.

Cinnamon profil fotoğrafı
Cinnamon1 yıl önce

@SandraSmithFox Watched it. It was hysterical. You couldn’t have scripted it better than that. 😂

joe miller profil fotoğrafı
joe miller1 yıl önce

@SandraSmithFox Biden. Harris. They both have been running this country for the last four years.. It’s the economy, stupid.

Deegert profil fotoğrafı
Deegert1 yıl önce

@SandraSmithFox She sounds as dumb as Harris. Talking nonsense always

Mrs Malindo profil fotoğrafı
Mrs Malindo1 yıl önce

@SandraSmithFox Where do they find these people for surrogates? Craig's List? 😂

Jo Symon profil fotoğrafı
Jo Symon1 yıl önce

@SandraSmithFox Kamala is going to end price gouging but her team can't confirm if it is even happening.

Benzer Videolar

🚹 Stephen A. Smith dropped a SURPRISING take on birthright citizenship. “When the president walked in to the Supreme Court...to attend oral arguments...I’m here to tell you ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.” Smith then asked his audience the uncomfortable question about birthright citizenship: “Is it right?” SMITH: “The issue that I wanted to get into is birthright citizenship by simply asking this question.” “When the president walked in to the Supreme Court today...to hear their thoughts, their questions, their inquiry, their opinions on birthright citizenship in the United States of America.” “How’d you feel about that?” “I’m here to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.” “He campaigned on this issue.” “He’s been accused of not paying attention to stuff that’s happening on our home soil.” “You want to do something politically expedient to your benefit, if you’re President Donald Trump, this is the fight you fight, because millions of Americans flow with him on this issue.” “And the reason why it’s an issue that’s important to tackle is because remember what the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution states.” “Remember what it states!” “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. “Meaning if you are born on U.S. soil, you are a U.S. citizen automatically. Automatically!” “Here’s the part that we have to ask ourselves, and this is where the conversation gets uncomfortable, do you believe in birthright citizenship as an American citizen?” “Do you believe that somebody that crosses our borders illegally, to give birth on American soil, that their children, their newborn should automatically be an American citizen?” “According to the United States Constitution, there is no argument there.” “What I’m asking you is, is it right?” “Should it happen?”

Overton

530,124 görĂŒntĂŒleme ‱ 3 ay önce

AFP’s Danny Kemp: “Mr. Vice President, you presumably watched the video yourself. There’s not the slightest doubt in your mind, having viewed it, that this the victim — you still believe that she deliberately tried to ram him despite despite seeing this video?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Look, I don’t know what it’s in a person’s heart or in a person’s head. And obviously, we’re not going to get the chance to ask this woman what was going on. What I am certain of is that she violated the law. What I am certain of is that that officer had every reason to think that he was under very serious threat for injury, or in fact, his life. What is I’m certain of that she accelerated in a way where she ran into the guy. I don’t know what was in her heart and what was in her head, but I know that she violated the law, and I know that officer was acting in self-defense. That’s raises an interesting point, though. Look, if people want to say that we should have a legitimate debate about, you know, what was she really doing, right? Was she panicking when she drove into this officer, or was she actually trying to ram him? That’s a — that’s a reasonable conversation. What’s not reasonable is for so many of you to plaster all over the media that this was an innocent woman and that the ICE agent committed murder, which is what many of you have said explicitly, and some of you have said implicitly. That’s what I have an objection to. The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart.”

Curtis Houck

19,488 görĂŒntĂŒleme ‱ 6 ay önce

Wow. BRUTAL words for her fellow liberals from Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky on CNN: “I’m going to speak some hard truths...We are not be party of common sense, which is the message the voters sent to us...When we address Latino voters...as Latinx, for instance, b/c that’s the politically correct thing to do, it makes them think we don’t even live in the same planet as they do. When we are too afraid to say that, hey, college kids, if you're trashing the campus of Columbia University b/c you’re unhappy about some sort of policy and you’re taking over a university and you’re trashing it and preventing other students from learning, that is unacceptable. But we’re so worried about alienating one or another cohort in our coalition that we do not know what to say when normal people look at that and say, wait a second. I send my kids to college so they can learn, not so they can burn buildings and trash lawns, right? And so on and so forth. When we put pronouns after names and say she/her as opposed to saying, you know what, if I call you by the wrong pronoun, call me out. I am sorry. I won't do it again. But stop with the virtue signaling and speak to people like they’re normal. There is nothing that I'm going to say to Shermichael that I’m not going to say to your or I’m not going to say to somebody else. I speak the same language to everybody. But that’s not what Democrats do. We constantly try to parse out different ways of speaking because our focus groups or polling shows that so-and-so appeals to such and such. That’s not how normal people think. It is not common sense and we need to start being the part of common sense again. Joe Biden is not responsible for that, neither is Kamala Harris. That is a problem that Democrats have had for years. I’ve been banging the drum on this for I don’t know how — probably ten years on this. We need to get back to being the party of common sense that people look at us and say we understand you. We appreciate what you say because you speak our language. And, until we do that, we should stop blaming other people for our own mistakes.”

Curtis Houck

12,249,308 görĂŒntĂŒleme ‱ 1 yıl önce