Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨Watch this Kamala Harris surrogate absolutely implode when Sandra Smith asks her what is Kamala’s plan to lower prices: Sandra Smith: “What is Harris’s plan? We’re waiting.” Kamala surrogate: “There’s a lot of aspects to it in regards to looking at in online. Let’s talk about lowering the grocery...

2,077,572 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Steve Cortes's profile picture
Steve Cortes1 year ago

Kamala is pathetic and anti-Catholic.

Terry's profile picture
Terry1 year ago

Great job Sandra Smith. Kamala’s surrogate was even dumber than her boss. The fact she pulled the woman on woman card when you were just asking a valid question was so pathetic. Groceries and food have a 1.7% profit margin. There is no price gouging just failed Harris and Biden policies

fixnow's profile picture
fixnow1 year ago

@SandraSmithFox Sandra was so polite to her despite the surrogate being an obvious imbecile

SeldenGADawgs's profile picture
SeldenGADawgs1 year ago

@SandraSmithFox This woman was as clueless & rambling as Kamala! It MUST be a requirement for a job 🤣🤣🤣

Patriot Erin's profile picture
Patriot Erin1 year ago

@SandraSmithFox OMG. The only people d᝼mber than these m0r0ns are the id!ots who vote for them.

Cinnamon's profile picture
Cinnamon1 year ago

@SandraSmithFox Watched it. It was hysterical. You couldn’t have scripted it better than that. 😂

joe miller's profile picture
joe miller1 year ago

@SandraSmithFox Biden. Harris. They both have been running this country for the last four years.. It’s the economy, stupid.

Deegert's profile picture
Deegert1 year ago

@SandraSmithFox She sounds as dumb as Harris. Talking nonsense always

Mrs Malindo's profile picture
Mrs Malindo1 year ago

@SandraSmithFox Where do they find these people for surrogates? Craig's List? 😂

Jo Symon's profile picture
Jo Symon1 year ago

@SandraSmithFox Kamala is going to end price gouging but her team can't confirm if it is even happening.

Related Videos

🚨 Stephen A. Smith dropped a SURPRISING take on birthright citizenship. “When the president walked in to the Supreme Court...to attend oral arguments...I’m here to tell you ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.” Smith then asked his audience the uncomfortable question about birthright citizenship: “Is it right?” SMITH: “The issue that I wanted to get into is birthright citizenship by simply asking this question.” “When the president walked in to the Supreme Court today...to hear their thoughts, their questions, their inquiry, their opinions on birthright citizenship in the United States of America.” “How’d you feel about that?” “I’m here to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.” “He campaigned on this issue.” “He’s been accused of not paying attention to stuff that’s happening on our home soil.” “You want to do something politically expedient to your benefit, if you’re President Donald Trump, this is the fight you fight, because millions of Americans flow with him on this issue.” “And the reason why it’s an issue that’s important to tackle is because remember what the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution states.” “Remember what it states!” “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. “Meaning if you are born on U.S. soil, you are a U.S. citizen automatically. Automatically!” “Here’s the part that we have to ask ourselves, and this is where the conversation gets uncomfortable, do you believe in birthright citizenship as an American citizen?” “Do you believe that somebody that crosses our borders illegally, to give birth on American soil, that their children, their newborn should automatically be an American citizen?” “According to the United States Constitution, there is no argument there.” “What I’m asking you is, is it right?” “Should it happen?”

Overton

530,155 views • 5 months ago

AFP’s Danny Kemp: “Mr. Vice President, you presumably watched the video yourself. There’s not the slightest doubt in your mind, having viewed it, that this the victim — you still believe that she deliberately tried to ram him despite despite seeing this video?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Look, I don’t know what it’s in a person’s heart or in a person’s head. And obviously, we’re not going to get the chance to ask this woman what was going on. What I am certain of is that she violated the law. What I am certain of is that that officer had every reason to think that he was under very serious threat for injury, or in fact, his life. What is I’m certain of that she accelerated in a way where she ran into the guy. I don’t know what was in her heart and what was in her head, but I know that she violated the law, and I know that officer was acting in self-defense. That’s raises an interesting point, though. Look, if people want to say that we should have a legitimate debate about, you know, what was she really doing, right? Was she panicking when she drove into this officer, or was she actually trying to ram him? That’s a — that’s a reasonable conversation. What’s not reasonable is for so many of you to plaster all over the media that this was an innocent woman and that the ICE agent committed murder, which is what many of you have said explicitly, and some of you have said implicitly. That’s what I have an objection to. The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart.”

Curtis Houck

19,488 views • 8 months ago